Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1075)
How Arnold Schwarzenegger turned into California’s Worst Nightmare

Click here to view this media It wasn’t long ago that Republicans planned to try and amend the constitution so that Arnold could run for President in 2008. There was a whole ad campaign based around it and even political TV pundits were discussing it as if it had a chance . Television ads supporting a constitutional amendment that would allow Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and other foreign-born citizens to run for president will begin appearing next week on cable stations across California, a newly formed group based in Silicon Valley announced Friday. The ads feature Lissa Morgenthaler-Jones, a mutual fund manager from the Bay Area and major donor to Schwarzenegger’s campaign, telling viewers: “You cannot choose the land of your birth. You can choose the land you love.” Arnold Schwarzenegger’s quest for power and his cover up of his lovechild not only seriously hurt his own family to the core, but also destroyed California’s state budget in the process. If it has become public he never would have been elected in that Daryl Issa cooked up recall nightmare and then he would have been toast against a badly run Democratic contender named Phil Angelides. Watching Arnold win his first election was as embarrassed to be a Californian as I’ve ever been. Electing The Terminator as a phony moderate Republican only highlighted the worst of this great state. Digby writes: Cyborg legacy The Republicans, Darrel Issa in particular, brought that circus to town but you can’t blame it all on them. Californians made utter imbeciles of themselves during that ridiculous campaign all because Gray Davis was “boring” and they wanted a totally kewl Movie Star to be the Governor. It was an American Idol election of the silliest variety and it had very serious consequences for this state. But hey — it’s not like we didn’t deserve what we got. And it played out in the fight to save our state budget and the welfare of its citizens as he chose Norquist over his vaunted moderate approach. In 2009 I wrote that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s budget cuts will finally finish off our state. In 2010, Susie wrote: Arnold: I’m Not A Liberal Republican Though I Play One On TV. Aid to Women, Children Slashed in Newest Budget Cuts! The extra cuts the governor made Tuesday — $489 million — took nearly $80 million that pays for workers who help abused and neglected children; $50 million from Healthy Families, which provides healthcare to children in low-income families; $50 million from services for developmentally delayed children under age 3; $16 million from domestic-violence programs; and $6.3 million from services for the elderly. Among other reductions was $6.2 million more from parks, which could result in the closure of 100, rather than 50, of California’s 279 state parks. In addition, Schwarzenegger effectively gutted a program that provides local governments with funding to encourage property owners to preserve open space and to use land for agriculture. Ted Lempert, president of Children Now, an advocacy group, called the cut to Healthy Families “particularly galling.” He said a coalition, including his group, is spearheading a campaign to put a universal children’s healthcare measure on the fall 2010 ballot. “A struggling family puts their kids first,” Lempert said. “What the governor and what the state has done is the opposite.” Kevin Drum nails it by writing: The reason the stories ran so late is because the special election was only six weeks long. If it had been any ordinary election, the Times would have spent far more time on its reporting and the story would likely have broken months before election day. In the event, though, the accusations were out work putting together a hugely complex story under tight deadline pressure. As far as I know, the accuracy of their reporting hasn’t been seriously challenged to this day. And what about Arnold? He insisted that this stuff was so far in the dim past that he could barely remember it. But it wasn’t. Today we learn that he had cheated on his wife and had a child out of wedlock just a few years before. His megawatt-smile denials were pure pap, and if knowledge of his affair had been public it’s almost a dead certainty that the recall would have failed and Gray Davis would have remained governor. The car tax would have stayed in place, no bonds would have been issued to make up for it, and California’s deficit problems would have been less than half as bad as they turned out to be under Schwarzenegger. That’s what comes of running a politically motivated snap election with weird rules in six weeks: you don’t really know what you’re getting. In the end, the Times was right about Schwarzenegger, and his folksy boys-will-be-boys denials were lies. We’ve paid a pretty high price for that. And the state of California will be paying a high price probably for decades to come.

Continue reading …

John Lithgow performs Newt Gingrich’s epic press release that has D.C. buzzing. And here is the press release by Gingrich press secretary Rick Tyler , in all its infamy glory. The literati sent out their minions to do their bidding. Washington cannot tolerate threats from outsiders who might disrupt their comfortable world. The firefight started when the cowardly sensed weakness. They fired timidly at first, then the sheep not wanting to be dropped from the establishment’s cocktail party invite list unloaded their entire clip, firing without taking aim their distortions and falsehoods. Now they are left exposed by their bylines and handles. But surely they had killed him off. This is the way it always worked. A lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught. But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimated by the political elite and are ready to take on the challenges America faces. One wonders at this point whether Newt Gingrich has so much a “campaign” as simply his own extended comedy skit.

Continue reading …
Shane Warne’s last game: Mumbai Indians v Rajasthan Royals – live!

• Hit F5 or press the auto-refresh button for the latest news • Email your Warne memories to rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk • Read this delightful extract from The Spin • Read Mike Selvey’s lovely tribute to Warne • Buy Rob’s book, if you wish 5th over: Rajasthan Royals 37-0 (target 134; Watson 31, Dravid 5) The right-arm seamer Dhawal Kulkarni replaces Patel. There’s a shocking piece of running from the fourth ball, and Watson would have been run out by a mile had Harbhajan’s throw from near mid on either hit the stumps or gone into the keeper’s gloves. Instead Harbhajan yorked the keeper and the ball flew to short third man, which gave Watson time to get back. Five from the over. “On the topic of Warne, he was the reason I started watching cricket,” says Phil Sawyer. “I was a young, angry (well, slightly irritated) punk at the time, and thought cricket was a toff’s game. Then my sister pursuaded me to watch the first Test in the 1993 Ashes and he instantly mesmerised not only the English batting line up but me as well. So as well as thanking him for all the years of genius he’s treated us to (and even the years of pain he’s subjected us English supporters to), I must thank him for getting me hooked on the greatest sport in the world. Thanks, Shane.” I didn’t realise until earlier today that Warne also bowled against England on the 1990-91 tour. No prizes for guessing which poor bugger he dismissed . 4th over: Rajasthan Royals 32-0 (target 134; Watson 28, Dravid 3) Here’s Lasith Malinga, the tournament’s top wicket-taker by a formidable distance (he has 27; the next best is Munaf Patel with 17). Watson gets his off drive right this time, slamming it to the left of Malinga and away for four. Shot! Malinga’s response is a wonderful bouncer that smashes into the helmet. Watson, beaten for pace, had nowhere to go because the line was so good and tried to jerk his head away at the last minute, but it was too late and clattered into the grille. That was a storming delivery, and when Malinga digs in another short ball the unsettled Watson pulls it just over mid on for four. Terrific stuff. 3rd over: Rajasthan Royals 24-0 (target 134; Watson 20, Dravid 3) Just four singles from Patel’s over. Watson plays a couple of handsome off-drivers, but both go straight to mid off. That’s his weakness in Test cricket, not finding the gaps. Placement is a bit underrated in cricket. Who have been the great placers of the ball? I tend not to notice them, with the exception of Eoin Morgan. “Farewell performances are often such sad anticlimaxes,” says Rene Kita. “I remember watching the last game of Wayne Gretsky, ice hockey’s Bradman, and I came away thinking that Jaromir Jagr is God. I expect Malinga to do the same in this game. I’ve loved watching Malinga, but the most hilarious moment in this IPL was when Vinay Kumar bowled Chris Gayle with a precisely copied Malinga slinger. It’s great to finally SEE cricket even on a tiny screen instead of just reading about it. Now I know what a reverse sweep looks like and why you kept complaining about England’s use of it ca. 2006-2008. Looks really silly when it doesn’t come off.” Did I complain about it? I don’t mind the reverse sweep. I suppose I was a different man back then: younger, more hirsute, more sexual . And less tolerant of the reverse sweep, apparently. 2nd over: Rajasthan Royals 20-0 (target 134; Watson 18, Dravid 1) Harbhajan shares the new ball, and Watson flaps his third ball over midwicket for a huge six. That was an awesome shot because he didn’t hit it that hard; there was just a quick snap of wrists and the ball went flying. The next delivery brings a pretty big LBW shout when Watson pushes around his front pad, but there is a bit of doubt over both height and line so Paul Reiffel says not out. Harbhajan’s next ball is a stinker, far too short and hoicked over midwicket for six more. “I was at Trent Bridge in 2005 on day three,” says David Weston. “I had been looking forward to seeing Warney play. Wanted to be able to tell my grandkids I saw him weave his magic. I never got to see him bowl a ball, but I did get to see him play. He was out first ball to a short one from Simon Jonesl! Magic! Of course the Aussies then suffered the humiliation of having to follow on for the first time in a gazillion years! GLORY! Of course, the Aussies were slow to realise that they were facing the best bowling attack in the world. Fortunately for the Aussies sitting near me, I was on hand to tell them all about it. At length. I even had my Mum with me. How could things be better?” If you’d been playing the Goon of Fortune ? 1st over: Rajasthan Royals 8-0 (target 134; Watson 6, Dravid 1) This isn’t all about Shane Warne. It’s a very important game from Mumbai, who need to win one of their last two games to be sure of reaching the knockout stage. Munaf Patel gets them off to a poor start in the field: the first ball is a wide and the second is tickled off the pads for four by Shane Watson. A few singles complete a good over for Rajasthan. “I actually cheered when Warne took that wicket,” says Nath Jones, “and I’m pretty sure it’s the first time that I’ve been bothered enough about the IPL to do so.” INNINGS BREAK 20th over: Mumbai Indians 133-5 (Franklin 11, Harbhajan 1) Harbhajan pushes the penultimate ball to long on for a single. So Warne’s last ball will be to James Franklin. He takes it all in, eyes ablaze; then has a chat with Rahul Dravid to build the tension (“what are you having for tea tonight, mate?”), makes one fielding change for the road, trots in one last time – and his last ball is a full toss! Of all the things. Franklin bashes it down the ground for a single, and Warne ends with figures of 4-0-30-1. He shakes his team-mates’ hands on the way off, and the Mumbai Indians’ fielding coach Jonty Rhodes runs on to congratulate him. That’s a nice touch. The team want Warne to lead them off, but he’s having none of that. So that’s it. Crikey, we’ll never see Shane Warne bowl again. Still, we have 20 years of memories. Onyer, mate. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 131-5 (Sharma st Shah b Warne 58) Here we go. The first ball of Shane Warne’s final over… and Sharma is dropped! Who writes your effing scripts? Sharma smashes Warne high to long on, where Menaria drops a sitter. Then Warne treats us a rare googly; it turns a long way, and Franklin toe-ends it just over the head of the man at cover and away for four. Franklin pulls the third ball for a single… and then Warne gets his wicket! Sharma charged down the track, was beaten in the flight, and even let the bat slip out of his hand as he aimed a monstrous yahoo to leg. In fact the bat went miles. As dismissals, go, that was pretty emphatic: stumped while halfway down the track and with no bat in your hand. Warne has stripped many a batsman naked down tuhe years, but never quite like that, 19th over: Mumbai Indians 125-4 (Sharma 57, Franklin 5) It’ll be Botha to bowl the penultimate over, which means Warne is saving himself for last. Botha concedes only three singles from the first five balls, but then James Franklin blasts an excellent drive wide of long-off for four. And now, ladies and germs, it’s time for Shane Warne’s final over. “Well, it’s the end of an era isn’t it?” says Guy Hornsby. “I still get flashbacks to THAT ball, but probably not as many as Gatting does. What an entrance, and what’s even more impressive is that, unlike many other bright young upstarts before him, he really was the real deal. So many prospective greats that flashed then died out, but this man has been relentless over his whole career, seemingly able sometimes to get wickets by sheer force of will and an icy stare. He may have the social skills of an average bogan, and the teeth like a Ready Brek kid, but I’ll miss him. Baaawlinwaaaarrnnneeyyyy. (acutally, I won’t miss THAT).” 18th over: Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Sharma 55, Franklin 0) Watson ends with outstanding figures of 4-0-19-3. Remember he was seen as a bit of a joke cricketer? He certainly isn’t now. He is such an impressive cricketer, a shoo-in for a world one-day XI. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Pollard b Watson 20) A superb, boundaryless over from Shane Watson ends with a vital wicket when Pollard drags on an attempted drive. 17th over: Mumbai Indians 111-3 (Sharma 52, Pollard 18) Another spin bowler is on, the young left-armer Ashok Menaria. Pollard slices his second ball a trillion miles in the air, and Taylor fails to get his hands on a very difficult, swirling chance running back from cover. Having been reprieved, Pollard strikes the next two balls for four, a vicious smear down the ground and then a scorching drive through extra cover. Brutal. “Could I just thank (really REALLY thank) whoever forgot to invite a key inidividual to the aforementioned meeting (2nd over) meaning the meeting got cancelled and I’ve been able to leg it home in record time,” says Phil Sawyer. “The last time I moved that fast was when Millings invited me to join him in a male bonding session.” 16th over: Mumbai Indians 99-3 (Sharma 51, Pollard 7) Warne is back. He will enjoy the challenge of bowling to Kieron Pollard. I wonder if there’s a challenge he didn’t enjoy, and whether he ever felt cowed on a cricket field. Bowling to Tendulkar and Laxman, maybe, but then in Warne’s head the next wicket was always round the corner, even when the score was 971 for two. Warne’s first ball to Pollard is a grotesque long hop that Pollard blitzes this far wide of the non-striker Sharma’s face. It goes for a single, and Sharma cuts the next ball for four to bring up a superb half-century from only 36 balls. Just five singles from an excellent over. Warne has six balls left. 15th over: Mumbai Indians 94-3 (Sharma 48, Pollard 5) Another gorgeous stroke from Sharma. He gave himself loads of room outside leg, so Botha followed him, but Sharma was still able to flash the ball through extra cover for four. Nine from the over. “Very canny of Warne to have his own ending staged a day before the world ends,” says Ian Copestake. “If tomorrow is the Day of Rapture (go figure) then let today be the Day of Rippers.” 14th over: Mumbai Indians 85-3 (Sharma 41, Pollard 3) Rohit Sharma is the only man who has looked comfortable thus far, and he cuts Singh’s slower ball expertly wide of short third man for four. Two balls later, when Singh pitches short, Sharma pings a mighty six over square leg when Singh pitches short. That was a stunning shot, a dramatic whirl of the arms that sent the ball flying over the rope. Sharma has 41 from 30 balls; the rest have 41 from 54 between them. “Just wanted to add to the army of fans out there who will miss dear Warnie,” says Clare Davies. “And is it true that his teeth can be seen from outer space?” 13th over: Mumbai Indians 70-3 (Sharma 28, Pollard 1) Warne has replaced himself with Botha. Four from the over. In other news, remember how depressing it was, back in the day, when England were always duffed up by Australia A? The reverse is happening now . “I did have some memories of Warney,” says Luke Dealtry, “but then I saw this picture from yesterday , and they all seem to have disappeared. What is he?” He’s Shane Warne. That’s his job. 12th over: Mumbai Indians 66-3 (Sharma 26, Pollard 0) “Since I came into cricket only a couple of years ago, my memories of Warne are Portrait-of-Dorian-Grey-ish,” says Sara Torvalds. “One moment he is bowling that ball to Gatting, a single YouTube-click later he is, well, not quite so young or well-trained, nor quite as natural in colour; a very colourful carreer strangely compressed into one afternoon of googling.” WICKET! Mumbai Indians 65-3 (Tendulkar c Watson b Singh 31) Tendulkar has gone, caught at third man. He tried to uppercut a short ball from the new bowler Amit Singh and could only slice it straight to Shane Watson. For a couple of seconds, Mumbai is almost silent. That was an odd innings from Tendulkar, who could have been out of a few times. But on this awkward pitch, those 31 runs are vital. 11th over: Mumbai Indians 61-2 (Tendulkar 27, Sharma 25) A lucky escape for Tendulkar, who tries to pull Warne over midwicket and ends up clumping it back over the bowler’s head. The next ball is a beautiful slider, but Tendulkar’s hands are so fast and he manages to glide it to third man for two. Almost every other batsmen in the world would have been pinned in front. Warne is really enjoying himself, going through all the variations. The next ball is much slower, flighted invitingly; Tendulkar thinks about the big shot and then decides against it, defending respectfully to extra cover. Wonderful stuff. 10th over: Mumbai Indians 55-2 (Tendulkar 22, Sharma 24) Johan Botha replaces Trivedi and sneaks through a good over at a cost of just four singles. Tendulkar charged down the pitch to the last ball, but yorked himself in the process and just managed to squeeze an inside edge to short fine leg. Had he not done so he would have been stumped by a mile. “I was always amazed at Warne’s ability to contribute to a win,” says Gary Naylor. “Of his 145 Tests, he walked off a winner 92 times and lost only 26, some of which must have been dead rubbers. In his 194 ODIs, he was a winner 124 times, losing 65. How many times did the voice in his head tell him that he needed to make something happen and then he did just that? Because cricket is an individual challenge within a team framework, that ability is priceless – and nobody in the history of the game made more things happen than Warne. And if he had held that catch at The Oval in 2005, well…” The best example of that was the 1999 semi-final. Because of the finish, we sometimes forget Warne’s astonishing spell at a time when South Africa were cruising. 9th over: Mumbai Indians 51-2 (Tendulkar 20, Sharma 22) This is what we wanted: Warne bowling to Tendulkar. Warne drives his fingers through his hair, stops to think for a moment, trots in and bowls a very full delivery that Tendulkar squirts for a single. Warne fiddles with his field, doing what his instinct tells him, and is then worked into the leg side for consecutive twos by Sharma. Warne looks great. He has lost so much weight. He’s a great advert for dating one of the world’s most beautiful women. Or maybe he went on the Slim-Fast plan, like Barry Bethall. Later in the over he draws a leading edge from Tendulkar, which drifts just short of the man at short cover, and then Sharma clatters the last delivery through extra cover for four. An expensive over from Warne, 11 from it. 8th over: Mumbai Indians 40-2 (Tendulkar 18, Sharma 13) The right-arm seamer Siddharth Trivedi replaces Watson, and his fifth is cut crisply for four by Tendulkar. Beautiful stroke. Nine from the over. “Greetings from Brisbane where I’m about to start a 30 hour marathon home,” says Andrew Stroud. “Apart from Adelaide, stepping on his stumps at Edgbaston in 2005 is one memory, as is his running across the field to shake KP’s hand at the Oval after that century. A greatly feared opponent who will be sorely missed.” 7th over: Mumbai Indians 31-2 (Tendulkar 10, Sharma 12) Tendulkar survives another huge shout for LBW by Chavan. That almost looked extremely closed. Tendulkar rocked back and essayed a huge pull stroke, only to miss it completely, and Hawkeye suggested it would have hit a big portion of leg stump. It wasn’t as plumb as the first one, but it was still out. It looks like P.Satish Kumar was right. Tendulkar is all over the place. I bet he comes alive as soon as Warne comes on. Actually, in tribute to Warne, we should probably have asked you to text rather than email comments, shouldn’t we? Anyway. “Sorry, is Paul Reiffel, one time international team mate of Shane Warne, umpiring the game?” says Paul Wakefield. “Hardly seems fair.” You think that’s bad? The other umpire is Liz Hurley. 6th over: Mumbai Indians 26-2 (Tendulkar 9, Sharma 8) Danny Morrison persists with calling Sunil Gavaskar “Sunny G”, which makes him sound like some weird cross between a very, very, very, very, very orange drink and a long-haired smooth jazz saxophonist. Tendulkar has changed his bat; in the World Cup at least, that was about as ominous as when Gordon Greenidge started limping. He takes a single in that Watson over, and then Sharma slams a full delivery disdainfully over midwicket for a one-bounce four. “Warne has been brilliant in the IPL,” says P.Satish Kumar. “He has lit up the IPL like no other foreign player ever has. It is indeed sad to see him go. We Indians of course cannot be so over awed of his Test bowling mainly because his record against India has been generally modest but his impact on cricket is unquestionable. A true genius!! And Tendulkar was not given not out as per Law 74a. He was given not out as per Law 77a.sub-section.1.para-2: You never ever ever ever deny the viewing public a Tendulkar-Warne contest in Warne’s last game.” 5th over: Mumbai Indians 20-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 3) Chavan continues, and the new batsman Rohit Sharma works him for a couple to get off the mark, and then Tendulkar is beaten by another jaffa that spits pitches on off stump and spits past the edge. This has been an excellent start for Rajasthan, who hammered Mumbai earlier in the tournament . 4th over: Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 0) They’ve just shown an ING Direct advert, with Bumble doing the voice over! Brilliant. Bumble’s eccentric commentary cousin, Danny Morrison, is now in the box, and he starts by saying “Hello Sunny G”. I think I’m a little obsessed with Danny Morrison, and particuarly the way he ran domly em phasises parts of words you don’t ex pect . Just three singles from Watson’s second over. “Don’t forget Kevin Bloody Wilson’s tribute, ,” says Lord Selvey. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Rayudu c Taylor b Watson 2) Another one gone. Rayudu gets a leading edge towards cover, and Taylor runs back from the edge of the circle to take an excellent leaping catch. 3rd over: Mumbai Indians 14-1 (Tendulkar 7, Rayudu 1) Tendulkar is beaten by a peach from Chavan that turns sharply. Warne will enjoy bowling on this pitch. He’s currently talking about sledging Tendulkar. “We tried it in the mid-90s and he got about nine hundreds in a row, so I decided to befriend him.” Tendulkar gets his first boundary next ball, sweeping emphatically to deep backward square for a one-bounce four. “Some friends I’ve invented and I went to see the new leggy we’d heard about at a warm-up game on the Ball of the Century tour in ’93, and came away thinking he wasn’t up to much, because he’d just bowled stock leg-break after stock leg-break,” says Mac Millings. “Turned out he’d been keeping a few tricks up his sleeve. (The request was for Warne memories, not interesting Warne memories.) Hick mangled him in one of those games, didn’t he? 2nd over: Mumbai Indians 7-1 (Tendulkar 1, Rayudu 0) Warne’s in great form, chatting away to the commentators between deliveries but snapping right into focus for each ball. “Could I just thank whoever decided 4pm on a Friday afternoon was the ideal time for a meeting about exchange students, meaning that I’m going to miss Shane Warne’s last ever bloody match even though it’s available on free-to-air tv?” says Phil Sawyer. “Right, spleen vented. For now.” 1st over: Mumbai Indians 2-0 (Suman 1, Tendulkar 1) The slow left-armer Ankeet Chavan opens the bowling, and his first ball to Sachin Tendulkar brings a huge LBW shout that is turned down by Paul Reiffel. What was wrong with that?! The ball straightened sharply to hit the pad as Tendulkar missed a work to leg, and replays show it would have hit middle stump halfway up. Maybe Reiffel invoked the little-known Law 74a: never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever give Sachin Tendulkar out for a golden duck in India. “I’ve only seen Shane play once in the flesh: a one-day game for Hampshire,” says Matthew Brown. “He didn’t do anything spectacular with the ball, but I do remember one moment when he was fielding at slip. An ‘edge’ was taken, everyone appealed, and the umpire turned it down. The crowd booed mildly. And then, floating across the ground in an Aussie accent, everyone clearly heard the words: ‘We’ll get you next time, you bastard’.” Why was the umpire saying that? 3.28pm “Since you mentioned Simon Hughes, ” begins Ravi Nair. “May I ask if the delightful Isa Guha is also on the panel for ITV 4? It will make me run home the quicker.” The Guardian ‘s Isa Guha is not, I’m afraid, but this man is among the commentary team . That’s a good consolation, right? Oh. Now, if you have some spare cash and are not sure what to do with it, these are my bank details , you could do worse than sponsor my colleague Steph Fincham, who is riding through Sri Lanka in support of the Mines Advisory Group. Talking of bikes, I recorded a video of my morning BMX ride. What do you think ? Mumbai Indians have won the toss and will bat first. Mumbai Indians Franklin, Tendulkar (c), Rayudu (wk), Sharma, Pollard, Symonds, Suman, Kulkarni, Harbhajan, Patel, Malinga. Rajasthan Royals Watson, Dravid, Botha, Menaria, Rahane, Taylor, Shah (wk), Chavan, Warne (c), Singh, Trivedi. 3.05pm A nice description on ITV4 from Simon Hughes, who describes Warne as “cricket’s greatest conman”. And, as Graeme Hick says, it was almost impossible to play the ball rather than the man. Here’s a famous example of that, Nasser being sledged out in 1998-99 . 2.58pm Thanks to Andy Bradshaw for this link. Will you be Raptured ? 2.51pm ” You have to put a link to The Duckworth Lewis Method’s Jiggery Pokery ,” says John Stonestreet. “Just a perfect song inspired by that one very special delivery. Personally, my main memory of Warne’s bowling is actually Gilchrist after each delivery. ‘Aaww, wheeeel barlwed Shoine’ – sounded like a cat being strangled. This is a video I’ve wanted to see for years: the short spell in Colombo in 1992 that changed Shane Warne’s life. Australia, who trailed by nearly 300 on first innings, pulled off one of the great Test victories. If you’re not familiar with this staggering match, lose yourself in it quicksmart . Warne, who had a Test bowling average of 335 (!) after that first innings, took three quick wickets to win the match. Two Tests later he skittled West Indies with a second-innings seven-for, including that legendary flipper to Richie Richardson , and a star was born. A Warne memory from Harkarn Sumal “I had the dubious privilege of sitting in the Radcliffe Road End at Trent Bridge in 2005 on the fourth and final day of the fourth Test as England chased 130-odd to go 2-1 up in the series. The combination of my all-time biggest hangover (having been drunk to a standstill the previous night by my pal Becky in a game involving Connect 4 and Captain Morgan’s rum) and Warne’s mesmerising, strangulating, stifling, bullying spell – which nearly caused an ‘Adelaide’ before ‘Adelaides’ were even a recognised concept – left me feeling pretty much as uncomfortable as I ever have in my entire life. My memory may be playing tricks now, but I’m sure he had figures of 3-2-1-3 at one point. He certainly ended with figures of 13.5-2-31-4. It was horrible. And yet it was beautiful. The man is truly a dirty angel. Fair play to him for going out on his own terms, making bags of cash and getting a showbiz IPL stage on which he could muck about. I won’t say he was ‘class’, but he was certainly something else.” Lovely stuff, especially the phrase “dirty angel”. I’ve just had a look through the OBO of that run chase . Warne really could induce the sweetest terror. What’s your favourite Warne memory? Here are a few of his own, including that innocuous loosener to Mike Gatting in 1993. Preamble Hello. This is it, then. After 20 years, 1850 wickets, 3502 tweets , one costly diuretic and at least one comedy inflatable , Shane Warne will bowl his last ball in top-level cricket today. It is blithely said of all good and great sportsmen when they retire, yet with Warne we really can say that we will never see the like again. His Rajasthan Royals side cannot make the knockout stage of the IPL, but their opponents Mumbai Indians need a win from either of their final two games to confirm a place in the last four. Their captain is Sachin Tendulkar, one of the few players to master Warne . Even Rajasthan fans might be praying that Tendulkar does not fall to the new ball, just so we can see him face Warne one last time. Warne has never been a friend of authority, and there is something perversely appropriate about the fact that he is in the doghouse ahead of his last game. He won’t care. One of the things that defines Warne is the fact that, more than any other sportsman I can think of, he could not give a solitary one what anyone thinks. He will carry on doing what he likes, usually with that irresistible, rascally charm, and we’ll carry on watching. In an age of sporting automata he has been an old-fashioned superstar, warts and all. The main reason we love him, of course, is that he revived one of sport’s most beautiful arts. Not only did Warne revive leg spin, he also redefined it, taking its intrinsic element of deception to unimaginable levels. Watching him ease into a spell, working over the batsmen and the umpire, was the purest theatre. There has never been a better rogue psychologist than Warne – who, as we saw in The Miracle of Adelaide , could send batsmen round the bend at the thought of demons that didn’t even exist. There were plenty of live demons, too. Warne had all manner of deliveries; even if this wrong’un never really did master the wrong’un, there was still the flipper, the topspinner, the slider, the drifter, the zooter, the rooter, the tooter – not to mention hundreds of barely perceptible variations on his stock leggie. We won’t see them all today, as he has just 24 balls left to bowl. Cherish every single one. The game starts at 3.30pm . Shane Warne Cricket IPL Over by over reports Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Shane Warne’s last game: Mumbai Indians v Rajasthan Royals – live!

• Hit F5 or press the auto-refresh button for the latest news • Email your Warne memories to rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk • Read this delightful extract from The Spin • Read Mike Selvey’s lovely tribute to Warne • Buy Rob’s book, if you wish 5th over: Rajasthan Royals 37-0 (target 134; Watson 31, Dravid 5) The right-arm seamer Dhawal Kulkarni replaces Patel. There’s a shocking piece of running from the fourth ball, and Watson would have been run out by a mile had Harbhajan’s throw from near mid on either hit the stumps or gone into the keeper’s gloves. Instead Harbhajan yorked the keeper and the ball flew to short third man, which gave Watson time to get back. Five from the over. “On the topic of Warne, he was the reason I started watching cricket,” says Phil Sawyer. “I was a young, angry (well, slightly irritated) punk at the time, and thought cricket was a toff’s game. Then my sister pursuaded me to watch the first Test in the 1993 Ashes and he instantly mesmerised not only the English batting line up but me as well. So as well as thanking him for all the years of genius he’s treated us to (and even the years of pain he’s subjected us English supporters to), I must thank him for getting me hooked on the greatest sport in the world. Thanks, Shane.” I didn’t realise until earlier today that Warne also bowled against England on the 1990-91 tour. No prizes for guessing which poor bugger he dismissed . 4th over: Rajasthan Royals 32-0 (target 134; Watson 28, Dravid 3) Here’s Lasith Malinga, the tournament’s top wicket-taker by a formidable distance (he has 27; the next best is Munaf Patel with 17). Watson gets his off drive right this time, slamming it to the left of Malinga and away for four. Shot! Malinga’s response is a wonderful bouncer that smashes into the helmet. Watson, beaten for pace, had nowhere to go because the line was so good and tried to jerk his head away at the last minute, but it was too late and clattered into the grille. That was a storming delivery, and when Malinga digs in another short ball the unsettled Watson pulls it just over mid on for four. Terrific stuff. 3rd over: Rajasthan Royals 24-0 (target 134; Watson 20, Dravid 3) Just four singles from Patel’s over. Watson plays a couple of handsome off-drivers, but both go straight to mid off. That’s his weakness in Test cricket, not finding the gaps. Placement is a bit underrated in cricket. Who have been the great placers of the ball? I tend not to notice them, with the exception of Eoin Morgan. “Farewell performances are often such sad anticlimaxes,” says Rene Kita. “I remember watching the last game of Wayne Gretsky, ice hockey’s Bradman, and I came away thinking that Jaromir Jagr is God. I expect Malinga to do the same in this game. I’ve loved watching Malinga, but the most hilarious moment in this IPL was when Vinay Kumar bowled Chris Gayle with a precisely copied Malinga slinger. It’s great to finally SEE cricket even on a tiny screen instead of just reading about it. Now I know what a reverse sweep looks like and why you kept complaining about England’s use of it ca. 2006-2008. Looks really silly when it doesn’t come off.” Did I complain about it? I don’t mind the reverse sweep. I suppose I was a different man back then: younger, more hirsute, more sexual . And less tolerant of the reverse sweep, apparently. 2nd over: Rajasthan Royals 20-0 (target 134; Watson 18, Dravid 1) Harbhajan shares the new ball, and Watson flaps his third ball over midwicket for a huge six. That was an awesome shot because he didn’t hit it that hard; there was just a quick snap of wrists and the ball went flying. The next delivery brings a pretty big LBW shout when Watson pushes around his front pad, but there is a bit of doubt over both height and line so Paul Reiffel says not out. Harbhajan’s next ball is a stinker, far too short and hoicked over midwicket for six more. “I was at Trent Bridge in 2005 on day three,” says David Weston. “I had been looking forward to seeing Warney play. Wanted to be able to tell my grandkids I saw him weave his magic. I never got to see him bowl a ball, but I did get to see him play. He was out first ball to a short one from Simon Jonesl! Magic! Of course the Aussies then suffered the humiliation of having to follow on for the first time in a gazillion years! GLORY! Of course, the Aussies were slow to realise that they were facing the best bowling attack in the world. Fortunately for the Aussies sitting near me, I was on hand to tell them all about it. At length. I even had my Mum with me. How could things be better?” If you’d been playing the Goon of Fortune ? 1st over: Rajasthan Royals 8-0 (target 134; Watson 6, Dravid 1) This isn’t all about Shane Warne. It’s a very important game from Mumbai, who need to win one of their last two games to be sure of reaching the knockout stage. Munaf Patel gets them off to a poor start in the field: the first ball is a wide and the second is tickled off the pads for four by Shane Watson. A few singles complete a good over for Rajasthan. “I actually cheered when Warne took that wicket,” says Nath Jones, “and I’m pretty sure it’s the first time that I’ve been bothered enough about the IPL to do so.” INNINGS BREAK 20th over: Mumbai Indians 133-5 (Franklin 11, Harbhajan 1) Harbhajan pushes the penultimate ball to long on for a single. So Warne’s last ball will be to James Franklin. He takes it all in, eyes ablaze; then has a chat with Rahul Dravid to build the tension (“what are you having for tea tonight, mate?”), makes one fielding change for the road, trots in one last time – and his last ball is a full toss! Of all the things. Franklin bashes it down the ground for a single, and Warne ends with figures of 4-0-30-1. He shakes his team-mates’ hands on the way off, and the Mumbai Indians’ fielding coach Jonty Rhodes runs on to congratulate him. That’s a nice touch. The team want Warne to lead them off, but he’s having none of that. So that’s it. Crikey, we’ll never see Shane Warne bowl again. Still, we have 20 years of memories. Onyer, mate. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 131-5 (Sharma st Shah b Warne 58) Here we go. The first ball of Shane Warne’s final over… and Sharma is dropped! Who writes your effing scripts? Sharma smashes Warne high to long on, where Menaria drops a sitter. Then Warne treats us a rare googly; it turns a long way, and Franklin toe-ends it just over the head of the man at cover and away for four. Franklin pulls the third ball for a single… and then Warne gets his wicket! Sharma charged down the track, was beaten in the flight, and even let the bat slip out of his hand as he aimed a monstrous yahoo to leg. In fact the bat went miles. As dismissals, go, that was pretty emphatic: stumped while halfway down the track and with no bat in your hand. Warne has stripped many a batsman naked down tuhe years, but never quite like that, 19th over: Mumbai Indians 125-4 (Sharma 57, Franklin 5) It’ll be Botha to bowl the penultimate over, which means Warne is saving himself for last. Botha concedes only three singles from the first five balls, but then James Franklin blasts an excellent drive wide of long-off for four. And now, ladies and germs, it’s time for Shane Warne’s final over. “Well, it’s the end of an era isn’t it?” says Guy Hornsby. “I still get flashbacks to THAT ball, but probably not as many as Gatting does. What an entrance, and what’s even more impressive is that, unlike many other bright young upstarts before him, he really was the real deal. So many prospective greats that flashed then died out, but this man has been relentless over his whole career, seemingly able sometimes to get wickets by sheer force of will and an icy stare. He may have the social skills of an average bogan, and the teeth like a Ready Brek kid, but I’ll miss him. Baaawlinwaaaarrnnneeyyyy. (acutally, I won’t miss THAT).” 18th over: Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Sharma 55, Franklin 0) Watson ends with outstanding figures of 4-0-19-3. Remember he was seen as a bit of a joke cricketer? He certainly isn’t now. He is such an impressive cricketer, a shoo-in for a world one-day XI. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 118-4 (Pollard b Watson 20) A superb, boundaryless over from Shane Watson ends with a vital wicket when Pollard drags on an attempted drive. 17th over: Mumbai Indians 111-3 (Sharma 52, Pollard 18) Another spin bowler is on, the young left-armer Ashok Menaria. Pollard slices his second ball a trillion miles in the air, and Taylor fails to get his hands on a very difficult, swirling chance running back from cover. Having been reprieved, Pollard strikes the next two balls for four, a vicious smear down the ground and then a scorching drive through extra cover. Brutal. “Could I just thank (really REALLY thank) whoever forgot to invite a key inidividual to the aforementioned meeting (2nd over) meaning the meeting got cancelled and I’ve been able to leg it home in record time,” says Phil Sawyer. “The last time I moved that fast was when Millings invited me to join him in a male bonding session.” 16th over: Mumbai Indians 99-3 (Sharma 51, Pollard 7) Warne is back. He will enjoy the challenge of bowling to Kieron Pollard. I wonder if there’s a challenge he didn’t enjoy, and whether he ever felt cowed on a cricket field. Bowling to Tendulkar and Laxman, maybe, but then in Warne’s head the next wicket was always round the corner, even when the score was 971 for two. Warne’s first ball to Pollard is a grotesque long hop that Pollard blitzes this far wide of the non-striker Sharma’s face. It goes for a single, and Sharma cuts the next ball for four to bring up a superb half-century from only 36 balls. Just five singles from an excellent over. Warne has six balls left. 15th over: Mumbai Indians 94-3 (Sharma 48, Pollard 5) Another gorgeous stroke from Sharma. He gave himself loads of room outside leg, so Botha followed him, but Sharma was still able to flash the ball through extra cover for four. Nine from the over. “Very canny of Warne to have his own ending staged a day before the world ends,” says Ian Copestake. “If tomorrow is the Day of Rapture (go figure) then let today be the Day of Rippers.” 14th over: Mumbai Indians 85-3 (Sharma 41, Pollard 3) Rohit Sharma is the only man who has looked comfortable thus far, and he cuts Singh’s slower ball expertly wide of short third man for four. Two balls later, when Singh pitches short, Sharma pings a mighty six over square leg when Singh pitches short. That was a stunning shot, a dramatic whirl of the arms that sent the ball flying over the rope. Sharma has 41 from 30 balls; the rest have 41 from 54 between them. “Just wanted to add to the army of fans out there who will miss dear Warnie,” says Clare Davies. “And is it true that his teeth can be seen from outer space?” 13th over: Mumbai Indians 70-3 (Sharma 28, Pollard 1) Warne has replaced himself with Botha. Four from the over. In other news, remember how depressing it was, back in the day, when England were always duffed up by Australia A? The reverse is happening now . “I did have some memories of Warney,” says Luke Dealtry, “but then I saw this picture from yesterday , and they all seem to have disappeared. What is he?” He’s Shane Warne. That’s his job. 12th over: Mumbai Indians 66-3 (Sharma 26, Pollard 0) “Since I came into cricket only a couple of years ago, my memories of Warne are Portrait-of-Dorian-Grey-ish,” says Sara Torvalds. “One moment he is bowling that ball to Gatting, a single YouTube-click later he is, well, not quite so young or well-trained, nor quite as natural in colour; a very colourful carreer strangely compressed into one afternoon of googling.” WICKET! Mumbai Indians 65-3 (Tendulkar c Watson b Singh 31) Tendulkar has gone, caught at third man. He tried to uppercut a short ball from the new bowler Amit Singh and could only slice it straight to Shane Watson. For a couple of seconds, Mumbai is almost silent. That was an odd innings from Tendulkar, who could have been out of a few times. But on this awkward pitch, those 31 runs are vital. 11th over: Mumbai Indians 61-2 (Tendulkar 27, Sharma 25) A lucky escape for Tendulkar, who tries to pull Warne over midwicket and ends up clumping it back over the bowler’s head. The next ball is a beautiful slider, but Tendulkar’s hands are so fast and he manages to glide it to third man for two. Almost every other batsmen in the world would have been pinned in front. Warne is really enjoying himself, going through all the variations. The next ball is much slower, flighted invitingly; Tendulkar thinks about the big shot and then decides against it, defending respectfully to extra cover. Wonderful stuff. 10th over: Mumbai Indians 55-2 (Tendulkar 22, Sharma 24) Johan Botha replaces Trivedi and sneaks through a good over at a cost of just four singles. Tendulkar charged down the pitch to the last ball, but yorked himself in the process and just managed to squeeze an inside edge to short fine leg. Had he not done so he would have been stumped by a mile. “I was always amazed at Warne’s ability to contribute to a win,” says Gary Naylor. “Of his 145 Tests, he walked off a winner 92 times and lost only 26, some of which must have been dead rubbers. In his 194 ODIs, he was a winner 124 times, losing 65. How many times did the voice in his head tell him that he needed to make something happen and then he did just that? Because cricket is an individual challenge within a team framework, that ability is priceless – and nobody in the history of the game made more things happen than Warne. And if he had held that catch at The Oval in 2005, well…” The best example of that was the 1999 semi-final. Because of the finish, we sometimes forget Warne’s astonishing spell at a time when South Africa were cruising. 9th over: Mumbai Indians 51-2 (Tendulkar 20, Sharma 22) This is what we wanted: Warne bowling to Tendulkar. Warne drives his fingers through his hair, stops to think for a moment, trots in and bowls a very full delivery that Tendulkar squirts for a single. Warne fiddles with his field, doing what his instinct tells him, and is then worked into the leg side for consecutive twos by Sharma. Warne looks great. He has lost so much weight. He’s a great advert for dating one of the world’s most beautiful women. Or maybe he went on the Slim-Fast plan, like Barry Bethall. Later in the over he draws a leading edge from Tendulkar, which drifts just short of the man at short cover, and then Sharma clatters the last delivery through extra cover for four. An expensive over from Warne, 11 from it. 8th over: Mumbai Indians 40-2 (Tendulkar 18, Sharma 13) The right-arm seamer Siddharth Trivedi replaces Watson, and his fifth is cut crisply for four by Tendulkar. Beautiful stroke. Nine from the over. “Greetings from Brisbane where I’m about to start a 30 hour marathon home,” says Andrew Stroud. “Apart from Adelaide, stepping on his stumps at Edgbaston in 2005 is one memory, as is his running across the field to shake KP’s hand at the Oval after that century. A greatly feared opponent who will be sorely missed.” 7th over: Mumbai Indians 31-2 (Tendulkar 10, Sharma 12) Tendulkar survives another huge shout for LBW by Chavan. That almost looked extremely closed. Tendulkar rocked back and essayed a huge pull stroke, only to miss it completely, and Hawkeye suggested it would have hit a big portion of leg stump. It wasn’t as plumb as the first one, but it was still out. It looks like P.Satish Kumar was right. Tendulkar is all over the place. I bet he comes alive as soon as Warne comes on. Actually, in tribute to Warne, we should probably have asked you to text rather than email comments, shouldn’t we? Anyway. “Sorry, is Paul Reiffel, one time international team mate of Shane Warne, umpiring the game?” says Paul Wakefield. “Hardly seems fair.” You think that’s bad? The other umpire is Liz Hurley. 6th over: Mumbai Indians 26-2 (Tendulkar 9, Sharma 8) Danny Morrison persists with calling Sunil Gavaskar “Sunny G”, which makes him sound like some weird cross between a very, very, very, very, very orange drink and a long-haired smooth jazz saxophonist. Tendulkar has changed his bat; in the World Cup at least, that was about as ominous as when Gordon Greenidge started limping. He takes a single in that Watson over, and then Sharma slams a full delivery disdainfully over midwicket for a one-bounce four. “Warne has been brilliant in the IPL,” says P.Satish Kumar. “He has lit up the IPL like no other foreign player ever has. It is indeed sad to see him go. We Indians of course cannot be so over awed of his Test bowling mainly because his record against India has been generally modest but his impact on cricket is unquestionable. A true genius!! And Tendulkar was not given not out as per Law 74a. He was given not out as per Law 77a.sub-section.1.para-2: You never ever ever ever deny the viewing public a Tendulkar-Warne contest in Warne’s last game.” 5th over: Mumbai Indians 20-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 3) Chavan continues, and the new batsman Rohit Sharma works him for a couple to get off the mark, and then Tendulkar is beaten by another jaffa that spits pitches on off stump and spits past the edge. This has been an excellent start for Rajasthan, who hammered Mumbai earlier in the tournament . 4th over: Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Tendulkar 8, Sharma 0) They’ve just shown an ING Direct advert, with Bumble doing the voice over! Brilliant. Bumble’s eccentric commentary cousin, Danny Morrison, is now in the box, and he starts by saying “Hello Sunny G”. I think I’m a little obsessed with Danny Morrison, and particuarly the way he ran domly em phasises parts of words you don’t ex pect . Just three singles from Watson’s second over. “Don’t forget Kevin Bloody Wilson’s tribute, ,” says Lord Selvey. WICKET! Mumbai Indians 17-2 (Rayudu c Taylor b Watson 2) Another one gone. Rayudu gets a leading edge towards cover, and Taylor runs back from the edge of the circle to take an excellent leaping catch. 3rd over: Mumbai Indians 14-1 (Tendulkar 7, Rayudu 1) Tendulkar is beaten by a peach from Chavan that turns sharply. Warne will enjoy bowling on this pitch. He’s currently talking about sledging Tendulkar. “We tried it in the mid-90s and he got about nine hundreds in a row, so I decided to befriend him.” Tendulkar gets his first boundary next ball, sweeping emphatically to deep backward square for a one-bounce four. “Some friends I’ve invented and I went to see the new leggy we’d heard about at a warm-up game on the Ball of the Century tour in ’93, and came away thinking he wasn’t up to much, because he’d just bowled stock leg-break after stock leg-break,” says Mac Millings. “Turned out he’d been keeping a few tricks up his sleeve. (The request was for Warne memories, not interesting Warne memories.) Hick mangled him in one of those games, didn’t he? 2nd over: Mumbai Indians 7-1 (Tendulkar 1, Rayudu 0) Warne’s in great form, chatting away to the commentators between deliveries but snapping right into focus for each ball. “Could I just thank whoever decided 4pm on a Friday afternoon was the ideal time for a meeting about exchange students, meaning that I’m going to miss Shane Warne’s last ever bloody match even though it’s available on free-to-air tv?” says Phil Sawyer. “Right, spleen vented. For now.” 1st over: Mumbai Indians 2-0 (Suman 1, Tendulkar 1) The slow left-armer Ankeet Chavan opens the bowling, and his first ball to Sachin Tendulkar brings a huge LBW shout that is turned down by Paul Reiffel. What was wrong with that?! The ball straightened sharply to hit the pad as Tendulkar missed a work to leg, and replays show it would have hit middle stump halfway up. Maybe Reiffel invoked the little-known Law 74a: never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever give Sachin Tendulkar out for a golden duck in India. “I’ve only seen Shane play once in the flesh: a one-day game for Hampshire,” says Matthew Brown. “He didn’t do anything spectacular with the ball, but I do remember one moment when he was fielding at slip. An ‘edge’ was taken, everyone appealed, and the umpire turned it down. The crowd booed mildly. And then, floating across the ground in an Aussie accent, everyone clearly heard the words: ‘We’ll get you next time, you bastard’.” Why was the umpire saying that? 3.28pm “Since you mentioned Simon Hughes, ” begins Ravi Nair. “May I ask if the delightful Isa Guha is also on the panel for ITV 4? It will make me run home the quicker.” The Guardian ‘s Isa Guha is not, I’m afraid, but this man is among the commentary team . That’s a good consolation, right? Oh. Now, if you have some spare cash and are not sure what to do with it, these are my bank details , you could do worse than sponsor my colleague Steph Fincham, who is riding through Sri Lanka in support of the Mines Advisory Group. Talking of bikes, I recorded a video of my morning BMX ride. What do you think ? Mumbai Indians have won the toss and will bat first. Mumbai Indians Franklin, Tendulkar (c), Rayudu (wk), Sharma, Pollard, Symonds, Suman, Kulkarni, Harbhajan, Patel, Malinga. Rajasthan Royals Watson, Dravid, Botha, Menaria, Rahane, Taylor, Shah (wk), Chavan, Warne (c), Singh, Trivedi. 3.05pm A nice description on ITV4 from Simon Hughes, who describes Warne as “cricket’s greatest conman”. And, as Graeme Hick says, it was almost impossible to play the ball rather than the man. Here’s a famous example of that, Nasser being sledged out in 1998-99 . 2.58pm Thanks to Andy Bradshaw for this link. Will you be Raptured ? 2.51pm ” You have to put a link to The Duckworth Lewis Method’s Jiggery Pokery ,” says John Stonestreet. “Just a perfect song inspired by that one very special delivery. Personally, my main memory of Warne’s bowling is actually Gilchrist after each delivery. ‘Aaww, wheeeel barlwed Shoine’ – sounded like a cat being strangled. This is a video I’ve wanted to see for years: the short spell in Colombo in 1992 that changed Shane Warne’s life. Australia, who trailed by nearly 300 on first innings, pulled off one of the great Test victories. If you’re not familiar with this staggering match, lose yourself in it quicksmart . Warne, who had a Test bowling average of 335 (!) after that first innings, took three quick wickets to win the match. Two Tests later he skittled West Indies with a second-innings seven-for, including that legendary flipper to Richie Richardson , and a star was born. A Warne memory from Harkarn Sumal “I had the dubious privilege of sitting in the Radcliffe Road End at Trent Bridge in 2005 on the fourth and final day of the fourth Test as England chased 130-odd to go 2-1 up in the series. The combination of my all-time biggest hangover (having been drunk to a standstill the previous night by my pal Becky in a game involving Connect 4 and Captain Morgan’s rum) and Warne’s mesmerising, strangulating, stifling, bullying spell – which nearly caused an ‘Adelaide’ before ‘Adelaides’ were even a recognised concept – left me feeling pretty much as uncomfortable as I ever have in my entire life. My memory may be playing tricks now, but I’m sure he had figures of 3-2-1-3 at one point. He certainly ended with figures of 13.5-2-31-4. It was horrible. And yet it was beautiful. The man is truly a dirty angel. Fair play to him for going out on his own terms, making bags of cash and getting a showbiz IPL stage on which he could muck about. I won’t say he was ‘class’, but he was certainly something else.” Lovely stuff, especially the phrase “dirty angel”. I’ve just had a look through the OBO of that run chase . Warne really could induce the sweetest terror. What’s your favourite Warne memory? Here are a few of his own, including that innocuous loosener to Mike Gatting in 1993. Preamble Hello. This is it, then. After 20 years, 1850 wickets, 3502 tweets , one costly diuretic and at least one comedy inflatable , Shane Warne will bowl his last ball in top-level cricket today. It is blithely said of all good and great sportsmen when they retire, yet with Warne we really can say that we will never see the like again. His Rajasthan Royals side cannot make the knockout stage of the IPL, but their opponents Mumbai Indians need a win from either of their final two games to confirm a place in the last four. Their captain is Sachin Tendulkar, one of the few players to master Warne . Even Rajasthan fans might be praying that Tendulkar does not fall to the new ball, just so we can see him face Warne one last time. Warne has never been a friend of authority, and there is something perversely appropriate about the fact that he is in the doghouse ahead of his last game. He won’t care. One of the things that defines Warne is the fact that, more than any other sportsman I can think of, he could not give a solitary one what anyone thinks. He will carry on doing what he likes, usually with that irresistible, rascally charm, and we’ll carry on watching. In an age of sporting automata he has been an old-fashioned superstar, warts and all. The main reason we love him, of course, is that he revived one of sport’s most beautiful arts. Not only did Warne revive leg spin, he also redefined it, taking its intrinsic element of deception to unimaginable levels. Watching him ease into a spell, working over the batsmen and the umpire, was the purest theatre. There has never been a better rogue psychologist than Warne – who, as we saw in The Miracle of Adelaide , could send batsmen round the bend at the thought of demons that didn’t even exist. There were plenty of live demons, too. Warne had all manner of deliveries; even if this wrong’un never really did master the wrong’un, there was still the flipper, the topspinner, the slider, the drifter, the zooter, the rooter, the tooter – not to mention hundreds of barely perceptible variations on his stock leggie. We won’t see them all today, as he has just 24 balls left to bowl. Cherish every single one. The game starts at 3.30pm . Shane Warne Cricket IPL Over by over reports Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Islamic extremist banned from London

‘CD’, who is under a control order, is moved to the Midlands after allegedly trying to get weapons for a terrorist attack A leading figure in “a close group of Islamic extremists based in north London” must be moved out of the capital to protect the public, the high court has ruled. The dual British and Nigerian national, who is subject to a control order and can only be referred to as CD, has attempted to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, according to security services. CD was reported to have attended a training camp in Cumbria in 2004 organised by Mohammed Hamid , who was convicted of training terrorists for the unsuccessful 21 July 2005 London bombing . He had also undertaken extremist training in Syria in late 2005 and returned to the UK in April 2009. Mr Justice Simon backed the Home Office case that CD’s removal to an undisclosed address “in a Midland city” was necessary to prevent covert meetings with associates in London to plan attacks. CD was served with a 12-month control order in February following government assertions that putting him on trial risked revealing intelligence sources. He had voluntarily left London but was still free to return whenever he wished. Lisa Giovannetti QC, for the home secretary, said there had been several attempts to procure firearms from seven north-London-based criminal associates. CD had also shown “a very high level of security awareness”. John Burton QC, for CD, said his client had not denied his extremist Islamist views or his association with Hamid but had not been arrested in relation to his attendance at the Cumbria training camp. Burton said the London ban was having a “devastating” impact psychologically and physically and asked why it was necessary as CD was already subject to a large number of restrictions. Rejecting the appeal, the judge said: “CD has a background and training which would lead to a justifiably held fear that he would engage in terrorist-related activity.” That by itself did not justify his forced relocation but he had tried to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, had held covert meetings and there were concerns over “his ability to evade the attentions of those who have a duty to prevent him putting his plans into effect”. The judge said CD’s wife and two children were entitled to a travel allowance to visit him, but that did not mean such allowances should be made available in every relocation case. UK security and terrorism Control orders Terrorism policy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Islamic extremist banned from London

‘CD’, who is under a control order, is moved to the Midlands after allegedly trying to get weapons for a terrorist attack A leading figure in “a close group of Islamic extremists based in north London” must be moved out of the capital to protect the public, the high court has ruled. The dual British and Nigerian national, who is subject to a control order and can only be referred to as CD, has attempted to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, according to security services. CD was reported to have attended a training camp in Cumbria in 2004 organised by Mohammed Hamid , who was convicted of training terrorists for the unsuccessful 21 July 2005 London bombing . He had also undertaken extremist training in Syria in late 2005 and returned to the UK in April 2009. Mr Justice Simon backed the Home Office case that CD’s removal to an undisclosed address “in a Midland city” was necessary to prevent covert meetings with associates in London to plan attacks. CD was served with a 12-month control order in February following government assertions that putting him on trial risked revealing intelligence sources. He had voluntarily left London but was still free to return whenever he wished. Lisa Giovannetti QC, for the home secretary, said there had been several attempts to procure firearms from seven north-London-based criminal associates. CD had also shown “a very high level of security awareness”. John Burton QC, for CD, said his client had not denied his extremist Islamist views or his association with Hamid but had not been arrested in relation to his attendance at the Cumbria training camp. Burton said the London ban was having a “devastating” impact psychologically and physically and asked why it was necessary as CD was already subject to a large number of restrictions. Rejecting the appeal, the judge said: “CD has a background and training which would lead to a justifiably held fear that he would engage in terrorist-related activity.” That by itself did not justify his forced relocation but he had tried to obtain firearms for a terrorist attack, had held covert meetings and there were concerns over “his ability to evade the attentions of those who have a duty to prevent him putting his plans into effect”. The judge said CD’s wife and two children were entitled to a travel allowance to visit him, but that did not mean such allowances should be made available in every relocation case. UK security and terrorism Control orders Terrorism policy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: Jude Law ‘targeted by senior News of the World executive’

Very senior executive ordered private detective to hack into actor’s phone, court told Jude Law was targeted by a “very senior News of the World executive” in the phone-hacking scandal that has engulfed the News International paper, the actor’s lawyer claimed today. Hugh Tomlinson QC said Law was of “long-term interest to the News of the World” and claimed “a very senior News of the World executive” ordered private detective Glenn Mulcaire to hack into Law’s phone. Tomlinson said the seniority of the executive allegedly involved could be “an important or decisive factor” when it came to apportioning blame or assessing damages. News Group Newspapers, the publisher of the News of the World, denied the claim. Law was named today, along with Labour MP Chris Bryant, in a group of five test cases who will be the first to have their legal action over alleged phone hacking at the paper heard by the high court. The five also include former Sky Sports pundit Andy Gray, agent Sky Andrew and interior designer Kelly Hoppen. Sienna Miller, the actor, was due to be among those whose case was heard until she accepted a £100,000 settlement from the newspaper last week. High court judge Mr Justice Vos said the level of damages awarded would be determined in part by who at News Group owner News International ordered Mulcaire to hack into voicemail messages. “The question of exemplary damages is determined by profit,” Vos said. “It’s one thing for a journalist to say ‘I’m desperate to get a story’. It’s another thing for the chief executive of a company to say ‘I’m desperate to make more money by getting stories in this evil way’. “Was there a conspiracy between Mulcaire and News Group Newspapers to intercept voicemail messages? The answer is yes there was. Was it an agreement between the board of directors of NGN? … I will have to determine the answer.” The court was told the test cases were selected to reflect different categories of claim which are likely to result in different levels of damages being awarded. A secondary list of five claimants has also been drawn up in the event that further people drop out. They include comedian Steve Coogan, former footballer Paul Gascoigne, Max Clifford’s former assistant Nicola Phillips, ex-MP George Galloway and Mary-Ellen Field, former adviser to model Elle Macpherson. The judge said Bryant should be included because a number of politicians had brought claims and the kind of damages involved in such cases were likely to be different. He said Gray’s case was useful because it was admitted there was an article written about him as a result of a message he left, so the court would not have to determine whether material was obtained by normal journalistic methods, as it might have to do in Hoppen’s case. He added that Andrew’s case has been selected as it was admitted in the criminal prosecution that he was the subject of interception, and was an example of someone about whom no article was published but who attracted interest because of the people he acted for. Although News Corporation has offered to settle several cases in which there have been allegations of hacking, teh publisher also says that many of the stories run about the claimants were obtained through legitimate journalistic means. The cases are expected to be heard next year. •

Continue reading …
Syria, Libya, Yemen, Israel and Middle East unrest – live updates

• Obama and Netanyahu meeting this afternoon • 20 killed in widespread demonstrations in Syria • Yemen’s Saleh promises early elections • Libya’s ambassador to Germany on verge of resigning •  Read a summary of today’s events 4.28pm BST / 11.28am ET: Currently, Barack Obama, and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are holding a closed-door meeting in the White House. Shortly after noon local time, the two leaders will make joint statements in the Oval Office, with a few journalists present but it appears no questions. Then at 12.30pm ET, the two leaders will be joined by secretary of state Hillary Clinton to hold a private “working lunch” in the White House’s Old Family Dining Room, which is in fact just a dining room and not a branch of a Midwest grilled meat franchise. 4.16pm: The White House meeting between Barack Obama and Binjamin Netanyahu is due to start shortly. 4.09pm: New video from Hama, Syria , appear to confirm that earlier eyewitness report ( 1.19pm ) that teargas was fired at protesters. _ 4.06pm: New video from Homs, Syria , seems to show clashes between the security forces and protesters. Gunshots can be heard and protesters appear to be throwing stones at the security forces. A witness in Hama ( see 1.19pm ) reported seeing protesters throwing stones at the police. _ 3.58pm: Here’s a summary of today’s events : • More than 20 people are reported to have been killed in the largest and most widespread demonstrations in Syria since protesters took to the streets 10 weeks ago. Most of the casualties took place in Homs but there are reports of violence across Syria . • Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh has promised early elections in what is being seen as another stalling tactic. Hundreds of the thousands of people have again taken part in anti-government protest in the capital Sana’a and the southern city of Taiz. There was also a significant pro-Saleh rally. • Libya’s ambassador to Germany appears to be on the verge of defecting after condemning the regime of Muammar Gaddafi . Nato launched its first attack on Gaddafi’s navy in a continuing escalation of its aerial bombardment. • The Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu condemned Barack Obama’s endorsement of 1967 borders. He said they were “indefensible”, while presidential hopeful Mitt Romney accused Obama of throwing Israel under a bus. Netanyahu is in Washington for talks with Obama . • The British-based photographer Anton Hammerl has been killed in the Libyan desert. His family called the Libyan regime as “cruel” for withholding news of his death . 3.49pm: Nidaa Hassan, a pseudonym for a journalist in Syria, writes: Homs has seen protests in several neighbourhoods, unable to gather together into one big demonstration due to roadblocks around the city. The neighbourhood worst affected today – which has been manned by checkpoints for days – is Bab Spaa, where at least 3 have been shot dead. Bab Dreeb and Baba Amr have also seen protests. All are predominantly Sunni neighbourhoods in a mixed city of Muslims, Christians and Alawis. Protesters in Homs say there have been joined by Christians and given water when marching through Christian areas of the city. Some Alawis are helping behind closed doors, afraid to be seen on the street, says one young protester who helps organise protests in Baba Amr. The streets of the city have been reasonably clear of security and army presence this week. Evidence of trouble can be seen in sandbags stacked up on certain corners and tank marks on the roads of Baba Amr. Outside the city however, tanks remain. Protesters here, as elsewhere, are predominantly men angered by the lack of jobs and increasingly infringement on their lives of the security services. Locals have rallied together to help – setting up hospitals in mosques and later – the mosque hospitals have been destroyed when found by army and security – in local houses, moving each week to evade being found. Doctors say they can only provide emergency care, however, and that some protesters have died due to their not being able to receive medical care in hospitals surrounded by security forces. Homs’ protesters have retained a sense of fun to evade security forces. In Bab Sbaa today one resident said protesters pulled down the metal roll-blinds of shops to make security forces think they were shooting back. Rollblinds make a noise similar to gunfire. 3.44pm: Today Syria witnessed the largest demonstrations, but also one of the most violent crackdowns, since protesters first took to the streets, according Damascus-based human rights lawyer Razan Zeitouneh . She said: Even in Banias, which is under siege, there was a protest … In the suburbs of Damascus, thousands and thousands took to the streets. Every Friday we see more cites and more areas joining the protest … People [have] broken the wall of fear and they continuing no matter how [much] it costs.” She said there were reports that more than 20 people had been killed. She has the names of 12 people who were killed. Most of the casualties were in Homs, but Deraa, Deraya and Idlib also saw casualties. “This week is more violent than last week,” she said. There are further unconfirmed reports of another 10 dead. They have a strategy to crackdown on protests. They have no language but violence. (Apologies for the quality of the recording and the pause in the middle.) _ 3.00pm: There is very noticeable difference in the scale of the demonstrations in Yemen and Syria . The protests in Syria have been larger than usual but at most only tens of thousands have taken part in individual demos. In Yemen hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets. Here was the scene in the southern city of Taiz today: _ 2.50pm: Nidaa Hassan, a pseudonym for a journalist in Syria , writes that according to a local doctor there are three dead in the Bab Spaa area of Homs, including a seven-year-old child. 2.19pm: Libya ‘s ambassador to Germany appears to be on the verge of defecting after condemning the regime of Muammar Gaddafi . In an interview with the Germany’s Spiegel Online, Jamal El-Baraq said: It will collapse. The regime is fighting against its own people. It fires on defenceless people with heavy artillery. I come from Misrata – my whole family comes from there. Every day, acquaintances and friends of ours are being killed there. A school friend of my son Rawad has just died… I will no longer accept what this regime is doing. I hate what the regime is doing. A government has to protect its people, not kill them. He says he is staying in post to help Libyans in Germany. I have not done any more political work. I only come into the office occasionally. But we have over 700 Libyan students in Germany. I make sure that they get their €1,800 allowance each month and that their health insurance and tuition fees are paid. 1.54pm: There are varying accounts of the number of deaths in Homs, Syria . An eyewitness told the Guardian that seven people had been killed, but an opposition group told AP that three had been killed in the city. The latest videos to emerge show protests taking place across the country. I’ve uploaded a selection to an update Google Map. _ 1.51pm: Yemen’s President Saleh continues to wriggle. His latest ploy was to promise early elections, according to Reuters. Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh called on Friday for early elections in an apparent bid to stave off Gulf and Western pressure to leave office, as thousands rallied for and against his three-decade rule. Saleh has twice backed out of a Gulf Arab-brokered transition deal, most recently last Wednesday, despite diplomatic wrangling by US, Gulf and European officials. Saleh in March called for a presidential election by the end of this year, but in his Friday speech he did not give any time frame or details on a plan for an election, leaving some sceptical it may be a tactic to buy time. “We call for an early presidential election to prevent bloodshed, to protect our family dignity and for a smooth democratic path,” he told a cheering crowd of tens of thousands of supporters waving his picture and Yemeni flags. Security analyst Theodore Karasik, of the Dubai-based INEGMA group, said: “I think it is a ploy to further delay the inevitable, to make it look like he is trying to leave power, but I don’t think that is his full intention”. 1.44pm: In a phone call a few moments ago (see 1.19pm) a witness claimed 20,000 people took part in demonstrations in Hama, Syria . This video from the city appears to tally with that estimate. _ 1.37pm: The security forces used water cannon against a demonstration in Banias, Syria , according to this video. The protest continued. _ 1.28pm: An eyewitness in Homs, Syria , just told me by phone that seven people were killed when the security forces opened fire on protesters. One of the latest videos from the city shows a demonstration broken up by gunfire. A burning emergency vehicle can also be seen in the clip. _ 1.19pm: An eyewitness to the protests in Hama, Syria , says the security forces fired first teargas and then live ammunition at thousands of protesters. “They started shooting live fire on people, two minutes ago,” he said in an Audioboo interview. He also claimed some of the protesters threw stones at the security forces. There were three or four demonstrations in different parts of the city, he said. Two of the demonstrations included 10,000 people each, he said. _ 1.09pm: Ian Black , the Guardian’s Middle East editor, has sent this analysis of Obama’s speech: The key phrase in Obama’s 5,400-word address on Thursday was: “The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognised borders are established for both states.” But American presidents from Bill Clinton onwards have used identical language. It was the basis for talks between Clinton, Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat at Camp David in 2000. It also formed the basis for George W Bush’s talks with Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert. Binyamin Netanyahu’s outraged rejection of Obama’s words thus appeared both tactical and synthetic. The accompanying notion of “mutually agreed swaps” allows in principle for Israel to retain settlement blocs it has built illegally in the West Bank and around East Jerusalem. The Palestine Papers showed just how far PLO negotiators were prepared to go in 2008 in accepting those “facts on the ground.” The row reflects Netanyahu’s dislike of Obama as well as mounting alarm that Israel’s diplomatic position is being eroded by a combination of international impatience and the changes of the “Arab spring” — especially in an Egypt now pursuing a less pro-American foreign policy. Netanyahu’s anger would have been genuine had Obama insisted simply on a return to the 1967 borders: that would have been a major shift in US policy. On the Israeli right, the 1967 lines are sometimes described emotively as “Auschwitz borders” — implying that they are so difficult to defend that they risk a second Holocaust. Those borders — more precisely ceasefire lines — were where the fighting stopped at the end of the 1948 war which accompanied Israel’s independence and the defeat and flight the Palestinians call their “nakba” or “catastrophe.” UN resolution 242 of 1967 calls for the withdrawal of Israel armed forces “from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” The absence of a definite article has sometimes been interpreted as suggesting that Israel could keep some of those territories. But another the key element — also carefully referenced by Obama — is “secure and recognised borders” for both Israel and a Palestinian state. Close reading of Obama’s speech reveals pro-Israeli positions on two crucial points: he rejected the Palestinian initiative to win recognition at the UN general assembly this September. He also called on the Islamist movement Hamas to recognize Israel after reaching its reconciliation agreement with Fatah. “Netanyahu could not have asked for more,” was the conclusion of Aluf Benn in Haaretz, one of Israel’s most astute political commentators. 1.05pm: My colleagues on the video desk have sent this video of Israeli and Palestinian reaction to Obama’s speech. _ 12.55pm: I have just been speaking to Victor Kattan of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London about the US’s attitude to Mahmoud Abbas’s plan to ask the UN to recognise Palestine . Kattan says that you have to separate the two issues Abbas is putting forward: recognition of Palestine would require a vote of the UN general assembly (which would probably pass), but membership of the UN for Palestine requires agreement from the UN security council, each of whose five permanent members – China, France, Russia, the UK and the US – has a veto. “If Obama decides for whatever reason he does not want Palestine to be a UN member, yes, he can stop that process,” Kattan says. He says the US would probably not attempt to block a UN resolution recognising Palestine – after all, this has been official US policy since George Bush’s presidency, and in his speech yesterday Obama reiterated that “a lasting peace will involve two states for two peoples”. And he feels that Obama might not even block Palestine’s admission to the UN. “It would be odd if after coming out and saying they support a Palestinian state they refuse to admit it to the UN,” he says. You can listen to our conversation here . _ 12.12pm: There is a bigger momentum to the protests in Syria today, according to Wissam Tarif of the human rights group Insan. “Hopefully the regime will respond with less brutality,” he said in a Skype interview . Tarif said he was disappointment that Barack Obama did not do more to condemn Bashar al-Assad’s regime. I wonder how can President Assad lead reform. We have had 11 years of promises but no delivery. In the last two month this man has proved to be a brutal dictator, when 920 people have been killed … The killing is still happening. _ 11.59am: There are numerous reports and videos of post-Friday prayer protests across Syria today. Here’s a Google Map showing the latest videos purporting to show demonstrations today. The blue placemarks show protests; the orange police icon shows activity by the security forces. We will try to update the map as more videos come in. _ 11.56am: Barack Obama’s speech contained mixed messages for the Palestinians . On the one hand, the US president stated that a future Palestinian state should be based on the borders that existed before the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. But on the other he dismissed Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas’s attempt to seek de facto independence at the UN in September as merely a “symbolic” move. As Abbas (above) explained in a New York Times article earlier this week , in September the Palestinians will ask the UN general assembly for international recognition of the state of Palestine on the 1967 borders and for Palestine to be admitted to the UN as a full member. “The admission of Palestine as a member of the United Nations has become an inevitable reality in September next,” Israeli-Arab Knesset member Ahmed Tibi said last month . The UN has declared that the Palestinian Authority is capable of functioning as an independent state and is only being held back by Israeli occupation. The World Bank and IMF agree. And, despite what Obama said yesterday, the US would only have a veto over this proposal if it goes through the security council, rather than the general assembly. Ian Black, the Guardian’s Middle East editor, says that if the Palestinians pursue the move through the UN general assembly it is very likely to pass. Decisions are made by a majority of the 192 members. Only the US, Israel “and AN Other” are likely to reject the motion, Ian says. He also points out that it was the UN general assembly that voted for the partition of Palestine into Arab and Jewish areas in November 1947 ; a move by the same body recognising Palestine would thus carry considerable historical and geo-political weight. ( This New York Times article seems to suggest that Obama could veto the vote in the security council, however.) Abbas believes “Palestine’s admission to the United Nations would pave the way for the internationalisation of the conflict as a legal matter, not only a political one. It would also pave the way for us to pursue claims against Israel at the United Nations, human rights treaty bodies and the International Court of Justice.” The Palestinian president says that “we have met all prerequisites to statehood listed in the Montevideo Convention, the 1933 treaty that sets out the rights and duties of states”: The permanent population of our land is the Palestinian people, whose right to self-determination has been repeatedly recognised by the United Nations, and by the International Court of Justice in 2004. Our territory is recognized as the lands framed by the 1967 border, though it is occupied by Israel. We have the capacity to enter into relations with other states and have embassies and missions in more than 100 countries. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the European Union have indicated that our institutions are developed to the level where we are now prepared for statehood. Obama and Netanyahu are meeting this afternoon at about 4pm British time. We’ll be covering the meeting here on the live blog. 11.25am: Harriet Sherwood in Jerusalem sends some details of Israeli press reaction to the US president’s speech last night: “Obama’s speech comes as a major blow to his [Binyamin Netanyahu's] policy,” wrote Nahum Barnea, a columnist for Yedioth Ahronoth, Israel’s biggest-selling newspaper. “First because of his explicit determination that the future border will be based on the 1967 borders. Netanyahu knows that if an agreement is ever signed, these will in fact be the borders – but he believed, and still believes, that ambiguity on this issue served him best.” Ben Caspit, a Ma’ariv columnist, wrote: “[Netanyahu] has heard, for the first time in history, an American president explicitly mention the 1967 borders as the basis for an arrangement between Israel and the Palestinians … This president, who now looks like a strong president, has crushed Netanyahu’s worldview, according to which there is no partner … [Obama] looks straight at Israel, looks it right in the eye, and tells it the truth to its face: the US is forever committed to the security and prosperity of the state of Israel, but the US is not interested in continuing to lie to Israel and to itself. Everyone knows what the solution is, everyone is familiar with the formula, here it is before us. Let Israel kindly sign here, here and here, and start implementing.” An analysis by Simon Shiffer, also in Yedioth, said: “No amount of whitewashing can succeed in changing the bitter taste of the pill served by Obama to the Israeli prime minister … Obama is the first American president who has defined in such a clear and geographic manner the outline of the arrangement that is supposed to end the conflict, in his opinion.” 11.05am: The UN’s refugee agency says more than 4,000 people have fled Syria to neighbouring countries to flee the government crackdown against protests, the Associated Press news agency reports. A spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees says some 1,400 mostly women and children have arrived in Lebanon in the past week alone. Andrej Mahecic told reporters in Geneva on Friday that many of those who fled said they escaped heavy military bombardment of the Syrian town of Talkalakh. He says a separate group of about 270 people fled to Turkey three weeks ago. 10.47am: Here is an Associated Press report on the fate of missing South African photographer Anton Hammerl (left), whose family believe he was killed in the Libyan desert by Muammar Gaddafi’s forces. He suffered a wound to his stomach in April after coming under attack with other journalists. “We believe that his injuries are such that he would not have survived without immediate medical attention,” [family spokeswoman Bronwyn] Friedlander said. “It is incredibly cruel that they [the Libyans] have been telling us that they had him.” 10.42am: The RAF took part in last night’s raids on Gaddafi’s ships, the Ministry of Defence has confirmed. Chief of the Defence Staff Strategic Communication Officer Major General John Lorimer said RAF jets hit boats used to shell and mine the rebels’ western stronghold of Misrata. He said: The RAF attack was mounted against the naval base at Al Khums, the nearest concentration of regime warships to the port of Misrata which Colonel Gaddafi has repeatedly attempted to close to humanitarian shipping. As well as hitting two corvettes in the harbour, the Royal Air Force Tornadoes successfully targeted a facility in the dockyard constructing fast inflatable boats, which Libyan forces have used several times in their efforts to mine Misrata and attack vessels in the area. 10.33am: A Syrian opposition group has predicted large post-prayer protests throughout Syria today as it coordinates with Kurdish groups on Azadi (Freedom) Friday. The group said it would only participate in dialogue with the regime if it put a stop to violence. Today, it became clear to anyone that the security and military approach, which the Syrian regime has used since day one of our revolution, has failed and had serious consequences on Syria as a country, and on the regime itself too. Thus, the minister of media and information has announced a comprehensive national dialogue in all the provinces … We at the local coordinating committees, while emphasising the importance of ending the military and intelligence solution and immediately transitioning to the political process, we declare the following: peaceful demonstrations and civil disobedience in all provinces shall continue until all our demands in our initial statements have been fulfilled. The group also set out its expectations for today: • Expecting larger protests in every single city and town throughout Syria. • Azadi Friday [Azadi is the Kurdish word for freedom] is expected to have large turnout in the predominately Kurdish areas around Al Qamishli, in north-eastern Syria. • Day of protest: today is the 70th day of demonstration in our beloved Syria. • Since the beginning of our revolution, we were protesting in a peaceful way and will keep it like that until the end. 10.23am: Martin Chulov in Tripoli, Libya , witnessed the aftermath of Nato’s first air strikes against Gaddafi’s ships in the port overnight. The stern of the ship, what looked like a small frigate, was ablaze after at least one missile struck it around 11pm. There were three strikes in total last night on targets in the capital. They came as the government was delivering its response to Barack Obama’s address on the Middle East. In a word, the Libyans were “underwhelmed”. Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim said the speech had come on the same day as a renewed initiative by the African Union, which called for an immediate ceasefire monitored by international observers and a gradual transition to democratic choices. Of the US and European backing for the Nato strikes, he said: “Media information is not valid legally. This is no legal basis for action. It is not Obama who decides whether Muammar Gaddafi remains leader or not. It is the Libyan people who decide this.” 10.10am: Patience is running out with Yemen ‘s president, Ali Abdullah Saleh (left), Tom Finn reports from the Yemeni capital Sana’a, where more vast protests are expected today . Saleh continues to prevaricate on whether he will sign a Gulf council deal to stand down with immunity from prosecution. One of the hitches is that he wants opposition leaders to sign up to the deal, Tom reports. This is maybe his last chance. People have become so disillusioned with these negotiations. If he isn’t willing to put his name on paper on Sunday we could see a serious escalation of protests … It has reached the stage of complete disillusionment. Meanwhile thousands of people have gathered in Sana’a for more protests today. We are witnessing an escalation of protests now in Yemen. The country is slowly coming to a standstill. It is a question of when rather than if now. We are expecting even bigger scenes [today]. I’ve just been down to the edge of Old Sana’a. There are literally thousands of people making their way to the university. The traffic has come to a standstill. _ 9.34am: Muammar Gaddafi has popped up on Libyan state TV again, ITN reports. It also quotes a government spokesman Mussa Ibrahim denouncing Obama’s speech: It is not Obama who decides whether Muammar Gaddafi leaves Libya or not… Obama is still delusional. He believes the lies that his own government and media spread around the world … It’s not Obama who decides whether Muammar Gaddafi leaves Libya or not. It’s the Libyan people. _ 8.19am: Welcome to Middle East Live on what looks set to be another busy Friday. There’s been a mixed reaction to Barack Obama’s Middle East speech . On the surface it sounded radical. If you take out the two neutral words “people” and “region”, the two most prevalent words in it were “must” and “change” . _ But the substance of the speech was more cautious than it sounded. The Guardian’s Middle East editor Ian Black was struck by Obama’s failure to mention Saudi Arabia The complete omission of Saudi Arabia was a glaring oversight … Strikingly, Saudi Arabia, one of the most repressive countries in the Arab world and a key US ally and oil supplier, got not a single mention in the 5,400-word speech. And on Israel-Palestine, Obama said nothing new, Ian writes: Nor did Obama offer any really new ideas on the Israeli-Palestinian impasse, reiterating the “unshakeable” US commitment to Israel’s security. Support for the 1967 border has long been the basis for any workable settlement, even if mention of it annoys Israeli rightwingers. It was clearly intended as a sharp reminder to Binyamin Netanyahu of where the parameters lie. But he did clearly oppose the “symbolic” recognition by the UN of an independent Palestinian state in September, an idea for which momentum has been growing internationally in the absence of any peace negotiations … Netanyahu will be pleased at Obama’s exclusion of the Palestinian movement Hamas as a negotiating partner. Overall, though, the US president did not go beyond what he said on the conflict in his big Cairo speech in June 2009. But he was right to repeat the now-familiar mantra: “The status quo is unsustainable, and Israel too must act boldly to advance a lasting peace.” Nevertheless US presidential hopeful Mitt Romney accused Obama of throwing “Israel under the bus” . On Syria, US politicians said Obama should have called for Bashar al-Assad, the president, to go now. His 2008 Republican rival John McCain said: “I would have liked for him to say [Assad] should step down,” according to Politico. And Mark Kirk, the Republican who holds Obama’s former Senate seat, said: “He should have been harder. He should have called on [Assad] to step down.” Here’s a round up of the latest Middle East news: • Nato planes have hit eight Gaddafi warships. “Given the escalating use of naval assets, Nato had no choice but to take decisive action to protect the civilian population of Libya and Nato forces at sea,” said Rear-Admiral Russell Harding, Nato’s deputy commander of the mission. • South African photographer Anton Hammerl was killed in the Libyan desert in April, his family said today. “It is intolerably cruel that Gaddafi loyalists have known Anton’s fate all along and chose to cover it up,” his family said in a statement on Facebook. • The Syrian government claims it is withdrawing forces from the besieged border town of Talkalakh. Opposition groups say at least 35 people have been killed in the town in the last four days . • David Cameron provoked a storm of protest after he welcomed the crown prince of Bahrain to Britain in a high-profile photo call on the steps of 10 Downing Street. Denis MacShane, Labour’s former Europe minister, criticised the prime minister for “rolling out the red carpet”. • Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh has said he will now sign a Gulf council deal for him to step down. Yemen’s opposition rejected Saleh’s promise, accusing the embattled leader of stalling. Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Syria Bashar Al-Assad Libya Muammar Gaddafi Bahrain Egypt Yemen Nato Matthew Weaver Paul Owen guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Stressed A-level students seek medical help in record numbers

GPs and mental health charities report surge in demand in last year before tuition fee ceiling rises to £9,000 Unprecedented numbers of A-level students are seeking medical or psychological help to cope with exam pressures this year. Record competition for university places and uncertainty over whether some degrees offer value for money are making 16- to 18-year-olds in England more anxious than ever, doctors, psychotherapists and headteachers say. The Family Doctor Association, which represents GPs in more than 1,000 surgeries, and the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, which represents 32,000 specialists, said their members had noticed a rise this year in the number of 16- to 18-year-olds they had treated for exam-related stress. YoungMinds, a mental health charity, said that this year, 39% of the nearly 900 calls they had taken from 16- and 17-year-olds were about exam anxiety, compared with 27% last year. Most were from high-achieving teenagers in affluent families who “put enormous pressure on themselves to succeed”, the charity said. Lucie Russell, director of campaigns, policy and participation at the charity, said there had also been a surge in calls from parents worried their children were “under intolerable pressure”. Russell said: “We are sitting on a mental health timebomb and the more we put young people under extreme pressure to achieve academically, the more we are storing up problems in adulthood that will cost us dearly in NHS and social care costs.” Headteachers said their A-level students were under unprecedented pressure to obtain their grades for university. Stephen Sheedy, principal of Queen Mary’s sixth-form college in Basingstoke, said he had seen a “significant” rise in the number of pupils on prescribed medication to tackle anxiety. Tim Hands, master of Magdalen College independent school in Oxford, said he feared the stress would make young people more likely to burn out and develop psychological problems later in life. Jo Cookson, head of sixth form at Shenfield high school, a comprehensive in Essex, said more pupils were asking the school’s pastoral care team for help to tackle exam-related anxiety. The warnings come as hundreds of thousands of sixth-formers sit their first- and second-year A-level exams. For those in their last year of school or college who have applied to start university this autumn, the results will matter more than ever. Some 583,501 applicants are chasing just over 400,000 places on degree courses. Those that miss their offers and decide to re-apply for the autumn of next year face paying back up to £27,000 over the course of their working lives for a three-year degree. Tuition fees rise from £3,375 to up to £9,000 next year, although it is only when students graduate and earn £21,000 or more that they must begin to repay them. Those that decide to go straight into work, rather than continue their studies, may also face disappointment. The number of jobless 16- and 17-year-olds has risen to 218,000, the highest since records began in 1992. Ian Bauckham, head of Bennett Memorial Diocesan school, a comprehensive in Kent, said pupils in their second year of A-levels were under more pressure than before. “They are under the impression, probably correctly, that the offers they are holding for university places are tougher than in previous years and … there is likely to be less room for manoeuvre after results come out for those who miss their offers by a small margin.” Sheedy said teenagers no longer looked to the future “with the confidence that their older brothers and sisters had. Young people are increasingly concerned about whether or not they will be able to afford higher education; whether or not they will be able to find a job on leaving school or university; and whether or not they will be able to afford their own place to live. In 30-odd years of teaching, I have never seen 16- to 18-year-olds so politicised, at least to the point of feeling that they are the recipients of a very unfair share of the cuts being made in public spending.” A-levels Mental health Students Young people Higher education Schools Health Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Stressed A-level students seek medical help in record numbers

GPs and mental health charities report surge in demand in last year before tuition fee ceiling rises to £9,000 Unprecedented numbers of A-level students are seeking medical or psychological help to cope with exam pressures this year. Record competition for university places and uncertainty over whether some degrees offer value for money are making 16- to 18-year-olds in England more anxious than ever, doctors, psychotherapists and headteachers say. The Family Doctor Association, which represents GPs in more than 1,000 surgeries, and the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, which represents 32,000 specialists, said their members had noticed a rise this year in the number of 16- to 18-year-olds they had treated for exam-related stress. YoungMinds, a mental health charity, said that this year, 39% of the nearly 900 calls they had taken from 16- and 17-year-olds were about exam anxiety, compared with 27% last year. Most were from high-achieving teenagers in affluent families who “put enormous pressure on themselves to succeed”, the charity said. Lucie Russell, director of campaigns, policy and participation at the charity, said there had also been a surge in calls from parents worried their children were “under intolerable pressure”. Russell said: “We are sitting on a mental health timebomb and the more we put young people under extreme pressure to achieve academically, the more we are storing up problems in adulthood that will cost us dearly in NHS and social care costs.” Headteachers said their A-level students were under unprecedented pressure to obtain their grades for university. Stephen Sheedy, principal of Queen Mary’s sixth-form college in Basingstoke, said he had seen a “significant” rise in the number of pupils on prescribed medication to tackle anxiety. Tim Hands, master of Magdalen College independent school in Oxford, said he feared the stress would make young people more likely to burn out and develop psychological problems later in life. Jo Cookson, head of sixth form at Shenfield high school, a comprehensive in Essex, said more pupils were asking the school’s pastoral care team for help to tackle exam-related anxiety. The warnings come as hundreds of thousands of sixth-formers sit their first- and second-year A-level exams. For those in their last year of school or college who have applied to start university this autumn, the results will matter more than ever. Some 583,501 applicants are chasing just over 400,000 places on degree courses. Those that miss their offers and decide to re-apply for the autumn of next year face paying back up to £27,000 over the course of their working lives for a three-year degree. Tuition fees rise from £3,375 to up to £9,000 next year, although it is only when students graduate and earn £21,000 or more that they must begin to repay them. Those that decide to go straight into work, rather than continue their studies, may also face disappointment. The number of jobless 16- and 17-year-olds has risen to 218,000, the highest since records began in 1992. Ian Bauckham, head of Bennett Memorial Diocesan school, a comprehensive in Kent, said pupils in their second year of A-levels were under more pressure than before. “They are under the impression, probably correctly, that the offers they are holding for university places are tougher than in previous years and … there is likely to be less room for manoeuvre after results come out for those who miss their offers by a small margin.” Sheedy said teenagers no longer looked to the future “with the confidence that their older brothers and sisters had. Young people are increasingly concerned about whether or not they will be able to afford higher education; whether or not they will be able to find a job on leaving school or university; and whether or not they will be able to afford their own place to live. In 30-odd years of teaching, I have never seen 16- to 18-year-olds so politicised, at least to the point of feeling that they are the recipients of a very unfair share of the cuts being made in public spending.” A-levels Mental health Students Young people Higher education Schools Health Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …