Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1071)
Andrea Mitchell Gives T. Boone Pickens Free Airtime to Push His Energy Plan. Meanwhile, His Huge Water Grab Goes Unmentioned

Click here to view this media After talking about how the Democrats and Republicans took symbolic votes this week on oil-company subsidies and increased offshore drilling, both of which are expected to go nowhere, Andrea Mitchell brought on T. Boone Pickens to discuss drilling for natural gas as an alternative. Pickens proceeded to tout the plus side of turning to natural gas rather than our dependence on foreign oil and talked about our need for a real energy plan here in America, which I don’t disagree with. Pickens defended the use of fracking for natural gas and claimed that those problems have been limited to eastern Pennsylvania and that there have never been those same kind of problems in the areas where his company has done business. While I have not come across any articles to the contrary as far as Pickens’ businesses go, that doesn’t mean that the natural gas industry is being properly regulated to assure we won’t see more nightmares with people across the country having their drinking water contaminated like we have in the NY-NJ-PA watershed , as Susie wrote about in her post on the documentary GasLand here at C&L. I think we suffer from the same kind of problems we’ve seen with offshore oil drilling when it comes to natural gas exploration. We’ve got lax regulatory agencies and companies that are willing to cut corners to make a buck and no real penalties after they screw up and destroy the environment because someone didn’t bother to make sure that a well was properly cemented, or they don’t put enough safety measures in place if it’s going to cost them a buck. It’s penny-wise, pound-foolish to the extreme, with no consequences because we’ve also got our politicians railing against the evils of government regulation destroying our economy. Never mind the damage done by lack of regulation. And — par for the course — the bad actors never get punished properly for their malfeasance. If you’re a large corporation that kills people or destroys the drinking water in an area, nothing happens to you because you can afford enough lawyers to hold things up in court forever until those suing you are dead or you buy off enough politicians so that what you’re doing is not considered illegal in the first place, but if you’re a common criminal, look out. The full force of the law is going to come down on you. And what Mitchell and everyone who brings this guy on to defend his “energy plan” for America always ignores is that he’s also interested in doing a huge water grab where he wants to put some of his wind farms. If we’re going to have an “honest discussion” about America’s energy needs and what our alternatives are, that ought to start with what the true motivations are behind those like Pickens and the policy changes he’s advocating for. Here’s more on Pickens and his “blue gold” that Mitchell didn’t bother to ask him about. “Blue Gold”: T. Boone Pickens and the Privatization of Water : Imagine a future where water is more valuable than gold – where corporations have control over the public’s water sources, and everyone has to pay a premium for access. It’s a scary thought for most of us, but for T. Boone Pickens, it’s a dream he’s banking on. When Pickens, a billionaire oil tycoon, purchased eight miles of bare scrubland in the Texas panhandle recently, some people were confused: there’s no oil in them there flatlands. What he’s interested in, though, isn’t black gold, it’s blue gold: water, contained within the Ogallala Aquifer partially located under the ranch. His plan was to build a pipeline from the aquifer to larger cities, selling the water as a commodity that, at least in his mind, would undoubtedly be in demand during times of drought. While it seems like there should be some kind of law against doing such a thing, the groundwater laws in Texas and many other states make it easy to get away with. When the laws were put into place, water was so abundant and readily available that no one ever considered the idea that people might try to buy and sell it in this way. So when it was time to vote on allowing the creation of Pickens’ water district, the only people required to vote on it were the people who live on the land: Pickens, his wife and three employees. Read on…

Continue reading …

They miss the obvious here: Some women are giving birth at home because they don’t have health insurance and can’t afford to pay cash up front for a delivery. That was true back in the 1970s, when I apprenticed as a lay midwife, and it’s even more true now. There’s no question that home delivery is much cheaper, and in low-risk births, just as safe when you have a qualified midwife. (For one thing, you don’t pick up those antibiotic-resistant superbugs in your own home.) The medical restraints of hospital births can trigger a cascade of complications and interventions that might account for the U.S.’s disgraceful 32 percent C-section rate . The standard line is that American doctors are jumping the gun to avoid legal liabilities, but I think there’s more to it than that: C-sections have become so commonly used that most medical students don’t ever learn non-surgical alternatives to managing a complication, and thus don’t know any other way to treat them. The argument against home birth is the risk. But why are our infant and mortality rates so bad? We have the worst statistics in the developed world. You can’t blame that on home delivery. The other factor in choosing home delivery is that the quality of prenatal care is usually much higher, since midwives are famously reluctant to chance a high-risk home delivery. Consider the typical profit-driven OB-GYN “assembly line” visit of 20 minutes or so. My visit with my lay midwife was more likely to last a couple of hours, including detailed questions about my protein intake, any unusual symptoms that might indicate nutritional deficiencies, blood pressure sitting and standing, and internal and external examinations. Midwives also recommend positions to encourage a breech baby to flip. (My midwife diagnosed twins in the last trimester that the woman’s OB-GYN had missed. Just sayin’!) So instead of moaning and wringing their hands as they’ve been doing for decades now, it might make more sense for ACOG to offer more affordable – and safe – alternatives to women. In England, it used to be that a low-risk woman in labor was provided with a midwife or doctor to attend her (the UK has since moved toward the American model of technology-controlled birth) with an ambulance on call outside her home. Oh, and by the way? Any kind of universal health care should include supported home birth as an option, because it helps control costs. Hospital-based maternity services are a very lucrative revenue stream. ATLANTA – Home births rose 20 percent over four years, government figures show, reflecting what experts say is a small subculture among white women toward natural birth. Fewer than 1 percent of U.S. births occur at home. But the proportion is clearly going up, study by researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found. The new figures are for 2004 to 2008 . Home births had been declining from 1990 to 2004. The increase was driven by white women — 1 in 98 had their babies at home in 2008, the most recent year for which the statistics were available. The increase is notable because doctors groups have been increasingly vocal about opposing home births, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has for years warned against home births , arguing they can be unsafe, especially if the mother has high-risk medical conditions, if the attendant is inadequately trained or if there’s no quick way to get mother and child to a hospital if something goes awry. Doctor participation in home births declined by 38 percent from 2004 to 2008. The percentage of home births attended by certified midwives and nurse-midwives grew, meanwhile.

Continue reading …
Alastair Campbell rejects Iraq dossier claims

Blair’s communications chief writes to Chilcot inquiry after intelligence official claimed dossier was designed ‘to make the case for war’ Alastair Campbell has hit back at a former defence intelligence official who claimed that the controversial Downing Street dossier on Iraq’s banned weapons programme was designed to “make the case for war” . The former Downing Street director of communications dismissed the claims by Major General Michael Laurie in a letter to Sir John Chilcot, the chairman of the Iraq inquiry. Campbell intervened after Laurie, who was director general in the Defence Intelligence Staff, claimed in secret evidence to the Iraq inquiry that the purpose of the arms dossier in September 2002 was “precisely to make a case for war, rather than setting out the available intelligence”. In his letter to Chilcot, Campbell challenged Laurie on three grounds: • “I do not know and have never met Major General Laurie, and was not aware of any involvement he might have had in the September 2002 dossier on Iraq’s WMD.” • “Neither I – nor, so far as I am aware, anyone else in Downing Street – was made aware of his views at the time, or at any time in the subsequent nine years, until he felt moved to write to you, and his letter was published.” • “Witnesses who were directly involved in the drafting of the dossier have made clear to several inquiries that at no time did I put anyone in the intelligence community under pressure, or say to them or anyone else that the then prime minister’s purpose in publishing the dossier was to make the case for war.” Campbell added that he had intended to refrain from making any comments on the evidence of other witnesses to the inquiry. But he added in his letter to Chilcot: “Given Major General Laurie’s letter was aimed at my evidence to you, however, and given the scale and nature of the allegations it led to at home and overseas, I would appreciate the opportunity to place the above on record to the inquiry.” Tony Blair’s former communications director decided to challenge Laurie’s evidence, published by the Iraq inquiry last week, after it sparked renewed claims that Andrew Gilligan’s controversial BBC Today programme broadcast was correct. Gilligan famously reported that the government had inserted a claim that Iraq could launch a WMD attack within 45 minutes “probably” knowing that it was untrue. Kevin Marsh, editor of the Today programme at the time, told the Independent last week: “The thing that rankles with me a little bit is that I thought at the time when Andrew Gilligan came with the story was that it wasn’t just broadly correct, it was 100% correct. Here’s the guy at the very top of the [Defence Intelligence Staff] saying: ‘We knew we were being pushed to find a certain bit of evidence and it was being presented in a certain way’ and that’s exactly what Andrew said in his story.” Campbell says that evidence at the inquiry into the suicide of David Kelly, Gilligan’s source, disproved the BBC’s central claim – that Downing Street inserted intelligence into the dossier knowing it to be false. Iraq war inquiry Iraq Alastair Campbell Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
NJ voters by a 2-1 margin say Gov. Chris Christie should not run for President in 2012

Click here to view this media The Republican Governor of New Jersey and resident conservative heavyweight champion of bullying got knocked down for the count when a new poll by Survey USA News in New Jersey told him to stay out of the 2012 Presidential election. By 5:1, NJ Voters Say Governor Christie Should Not Run for President in 2012: New Jersey Republican Governor Chris Christie, beloved by some and despised by others for his bluntness, has a Minus 18 job approval today as speculation continues about whether Christie should run for President. 38% of NJ adults approve of the job Christie is doing, 56% disapprove. You can imagine how bad Christie’s polling numbers are by households that have teachers and union members in them, but check out the data coming from Republicans in the state: Republicans and Conservatives have mixed feelings about whether Christie should stay focused on the Garden State or allow himself to be talked into putting both feet onto the national stage. * Among Republicans, Christie’s job approval is Plus 29. But: by 2:1, Republicans say Christie should not run for President. * Conservatives by 2:1 and Republicans by 3:2 say Christie is qualified to be President. * Conservatives and Republicans by 3:1 say Christie would make a better President than Obama. * Even among the state’s comparatively few Tea Party members, where Christie’s approval is Plus 49, there is division: 38% say Christie should run for the White House, 39% say he should not. * Among Independents, Obama’s job approval is Plus 7, Christie’s is Minus 11. * Among Moderates, Obama’s job approval is Plus 28, Christie is Minus 23. * Among lower-income voters, Christie is Minus 32. Among upper income voters Christie is Minus 5. This is the man that the conservative movement is trying to build into a national powerhouse , but he can’t even get good “poll” from his own state. (h/t Atrios ) Here’s a few of his other greatest hits: Chris Christie urges reporters to ‘take the bat’ to 76-year-old widow Gov. Chris Christie Takes Care Of His Buddies, Puts His Personal Chiropractor On State Licensing Board

Continue reading …
How to spot a psychopath | Jon Ronson

From Broadmoor to boardroom, they’re everywhere, says Jon Ronson, in an exclusive extract from his new book It was visiting hour at Broadmoor psychiatric hospital and patients began drifting in to sit with

Continue reading …
Vince Cable: People do not understand how bad the economy is

Business secretary says politicians have not made clear the time and pain needed to restructure Britain’s broken economic model Vince Cable has warned that the political class has not yet prepared the public for the scale of the underlying problems facing the UK economy and the coming squeeze on living standards. In a frank interview with the Guardian the business secretary repeatedly referred to the time and pain that will be needed to restructure what he regards as a broken economic model. “It is a challenge to us to communicate it better. I don’t think it is understood that the British economy declined 6 or 7% – [that is] 10% below trend,” Cable said. “We are actually a poorer country, mainly because of the banking crash, the recession that followed it and partly due to the squeeze we are now under from the changing balance of the world economy.” He argued: “Britain is no longer one of the world’s price setters. We take our prices from international commodity markets driven by China and India. That is something we have got to live with and adjust to. It is painful. It is a challenge to us in government to explain it. The political class as a whole is not preparing the public for how massive the problem is.” He expresses frustration that “the debate about the economy is in the wrong place,” partly blaming Labour for still being in a state of denial that its golden decade of growth had been built on an unsustainable model of financial services. “There is not a sustained critique, pressure or argument from the progressive wing of politics. Ultimately it comes back to this defensiveness and an unwillingness to accept that Britain was operating a model that failed … it makes it more difficult for us to get through to the public about the scale of the problem. That is to everyone’s loss.” He said: “As a country we are going to have to go through some very big major structural changes, but if the dominant debate is ‘Well, what is the problem? Why are we all doing this stuff? It is not really necessary.’ Of course it makes it more difficult.” Cable, one of five Liberal Democrat ministers in the cabinet, said it was realistic for the coalition to eradicate the structural deficit by the end of this parliament, adding “our credibility hinges on it”. But he does not convey optimism about growth in the short term. “The fact is that we are now having to get used perhaps to lower growth and a gradual process of building the economy up again.” He said: “We have had a very, very profound crisis which is going to take a long time to dig out of. It is about the deficit, but that is only one of the symptoms. We had the complete collapse of a model based on consumer spending, a housing bubble, an overweight banking system – three banks each of them with a balance sheet larger than the British economy. It was a disaster waiting to happen and it did happen. It has done profound damage and it is damage that is going to last a long time.” He predicted the impact on people’s lives will not come primarily from government spending cuts, but the squeeze in living standards caused by world prices and a 20% devaluation of sterling against other major currencies. Without questioning the growth forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, he stressed the uncertainty of external factors. “We cannot predict what is going to happen in the eurozone, and how that is going to impact on us, and we cannot predict what is going to happen to oil prices.” Cable recently wrote that “economic policymaking is like driving a car with an opaque windscreen, a large rearview mirror and poor brakes”, and told the Guardian the metaphor applied to Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, as he made the big calls on monetary policy designed to spur growth. More broadly, he said: “The danger is over-confidence — the belief that the government can control everything in the economy. Governments cannot. Economic management is difficult.” He also denied the government is locked into a cycle of more spending cuts if growth slows. He said: “What is not often acknowledged is that there is a lot of flexibility built into current policy. The main element of flexibility is in monetary policy and the second is the basic Keynesian stabilisers. That is the way the government is functioning. We are not trying to maintain budget balance come what may. If the economy slows down, the deficit temporarily has to rise to take account of cyclical change, flexibility is built in.” Cable expressed disappointment that tribalism has returned to politics in the wake of the AV referendum, admitting it will be difficult for his party in the short term. But he claimed the change could be turned to Nick Clegg’s advantage. “There is now a large constituency of people out there who, for want of a better word, are de-tribalised, who hate the ya-boo, left-right debate who are looking for a home, and in a way that is our constituency. Blair appealed to that [group] a decade ago, successfully.” He said despite the vitriol directed at his party during the local elections, it had retained a base of 15% from which it can build. Vince Cable Economic policy Economic growth (GDP) Economics Liberal-Conservative coalition Public sector cuts Public services policy Public finance Liberal Democrats Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Judgment Day is almost here for Senate Republicans ( oh, not this one ). I am talking about the upcoming vote on Rep. Paul Ryan’s crazy budget plan that is going to force the Senate Republicans to make a difficult choice (well, it shouldn’t be difficult for those who have economic sanity) on whether or not to support ending Medicare as we know it. The House Republicans chose to embrace it and results have not been pretty for them: Associated Press: Protesters Greet Paul Ryan in Chicago. “Dozens of protesters carrying signs and chanting ‘Tax the rich’ marched outside a hotel in downtown Chicago to protest a speech by Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan. Ryan is the architect of the Republican budget plan, which includes a controversial proposal to turn Medicare into a voucher program. Doug Adams of Chicago was among the protesters. Adams says people need to wake up because Republicans, Wall Street and big business think older Americans are an expensive commodity.” ( LINK ) Arizona Republic (AZ): Anthem Audience Challenges Quayle During Presentation On Medicare. “U.S. Rep. Ben Quayle had finished a Power Point presentation on the national debt this week when members of the audience started a running commentary and flashing signs that read ‘Hands off our Medicare.’ About 225 people filed into the Fellowship Church in Anthem on Monday to hear about a $14.3 trillion budget shortfall and ways to resolve it. The gathering quickly turned into a sort of political rally, with people arguing with the freshman lawmaker who represents Arizona’s 3rd Congressional District, which includes Phoenix, Scottsdale and Paradise Valley.” ( LINK ) Las Vegas Review-Journal (NV): Heck Town Hall Meeting Sparks Passions. “The crowd didn’t just argue with Republican Rep. Joe Heck at a town hall meeting in Boulder City on Wednesday. The 50 people in attendance often shouted at each other, indifferent to whether the Republican federal budget Heck was there to discuss would hurt or help Medicare and the job market.” ( LINK ) Associated Press(MN): Freshman Rep. Cravaack Defends Medicare Vote. “Terry Bell, 62, of Cambridge, criticized the slides for being inaccurate. He asked Cravaack to point out the last time Republicans produced a balanced budget. ‘Your party has added to the deficit ever since the Ford administration,’ Bell said. ‘The only time you get the least bit concerned is when the Democratic Party gets in.’” ( LINK ) Those are just few examples of backlash House Republicans are facing all across the country . Of course, the traditional media are not covering these events with the same intensity as they were all over the infamous corporate-funded town hall protests by Tea Partiers during the summer of 2009. Nevertheless, the Republicans are feeling the heat, resulting in their rather cowardly disposition heading into next week’s vote . Sensing the momentum, the Congressional Democrats turned up the heat today by releasing a brand spanking new report that shows that Ryan’s “right wing social-engineering” will more than double what older Americans have to pay for health care in every state . Specifically, the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee (JEC) released a new state-by-state analysis that finds out-of-pocket health-care costs will more than double for residents turning 65 in 2022 under Paul Ryan’s budget plan. From a JEC press release today: The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that a typical 65-year-old Medicare beneficiary in 2022 would see their out-of-pocket health care costs increase from $6,154 to $12,513 under the Republican budget. Using that data along with cost-sharing data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the JEC has estimated out-of-pocket costs on a state-by-state basis. While the increase varies by state, residents in all states will see their out-of-pocket expenses more than double when they turn 65 in 2022. Residents in Florida face the largest increase –$7,383. The report also shows that current Medicare beneficiaries will be harmed by the GOP budget, immediately losing preventive services such as mammograms and facing higher prescription drug costs. “This new JEC analysis helps to fill in the picture on just how disastrous and costly the Republican Medicare plan is for our older Americans,” said Senator Bob Casey (D-PA), Chairman of the JEC. “If Republicans have their way, traditional Medicare will no longer exist in 2022. Instead, our elderly will get a voucher to purchase private insurance, but the voucher won’t keep pace with health care costs. The result would be a staggering increase in out-of-pocket costs beginning in 2022. In my state of Pennsylvania, someone turning 65 in 2022 would face a $6,300 increase in their health care expenses. Our elderly Americans cannot afford to have their health care expenses double, but that’s exactly what the Republican plan delivers.” The increased out-of-pocket costs result from older Americans bearing a larger share of health care costs under the Republican plan and the increase in total health care costs that results from shifting from traditional Medicare to a less efficient, more expensive voucher program. “The Republican Medicare plan doesn’t rein in health care costs,” continued Casey. “Instead, it simply shifts the costs onto the backs of our elderly. The Republican ‘solution’ is providing our elderly with dramatically higher costs and less care. Current beneficiaries will suffer and the next generation will face retirement without Medicare and without the peace of mind it offers.” A nifty breakdown of this report can also be found here . It’s not pretty. No wonder Scott Brown is so tangled up over this. He has now been reduced to playing around with prepositions . Senate Republicans are crying that Democrats need to come up with their own “budget plan.” Leader Nancy Pelosi had a simple answer for that whine yesterday: “We have a plan. It’s called Medicare.” So what will these Senate Republicans do? Are they going to throw the older Americans off the cliff ? Answers are coming up next week.

Continue reading …
Women and the coalition: how the government is letting down women

There is mounting concern about the impact of government policies on women – and furious debate over the language used Labour MPs are attempting to set up a powerful parliamentary committee to vet government policy for discriminatory effects on women, claiming that the coalition has a “blind spot” when it comes to equal opportunities. Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary, said the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke’s controversial comments on rape this week betrayed a lack of understanding of gender issues across the government, and that there needed to be a democratic institution to act as a safeguard for women’s rights. Cooper and Fiona Mactaggart, the shadow minister for women and equalities, will meet voluntary organisations to unveil the plans. The idea is attracting support from both sides of the house. It comes amid mounting concern about the impact of government policies on women, and a furious debate over some of the language used by senior Conservatives in recent weeks, not least the prime minister’s now infamous “Calm down dear” comment. The Home Office, which includes the government equalities unit, said that the government was achieving progress for women, citing a £10m fund for rape crisis centres announced in January as an example. Theresa May, the home secretary and minister for women and equalities, is known to have been annoyed by Clarke’s comments on rape this week, describing them privately as unhelpful. Clarke’s remarks came in the week that government statisticians put the number of women claiming unemployment benefits at a 15-year high, as public sector job cuts accelerate. Research published on Thursday by Coventry Universitysuggested that cuts to other benefits will cost women £30m, compared with just under £12m for men. Cooper said that the coalition had a blind spot on women. “This is not just about revealing remarks – be it from the justice secretary or the prime minister. Women are losing out every time from government policies,” she said. “There is a toxic mix of paternalistic Toryism and laissez-faire liberalism at the heart of the government which hits women hard. Some still subscribe to the traditional Tory view of women and family life, and there is a deep and widespread hostility to state or public sector action – from tax credits to childcare – which help women get on. The result is that for the first time in generations, the clock is being turned back on women’s equality.” The idea of a women and equality audit committee has already been aired in the house this year, when some coalition MPs spoke out in favour. Jo Swinson, the Liberal Democrat MP for East Dunbartonshire, said such a committee would ensure women’s issues were high on the agenda. Claire Perry, the Tory MP for Devizes, said it sounded “extremely sensible”. The MPs behind the plans are confident that if put it to a vote it would pass with a majority. But first they must convince the Commons authorities of the necessity for another select committee, particularly when budgets are stretched. In a statement, May insisted the deficit was being reduced even-handedly. “Decisions to increase spending on health and child tax credits, as well introducing flexible parental leave and extending the right to request flexible working, will all benefit women. We are also taking 880,000 of the lowest-paid workers out of income tax all together, the majority of whom are women,” she said. “There is absolutely nothing fair about running huge budget deficits and burdening future generations with the debts we cannot afford to pay.” Women Women in politics Feminism Gender Equality Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Regulatory capture by the financial services industry is so pervasive, I don’t know that Warren would even be able to get much done. Certainly, she’d be undermined within the agency. But it would be nice to see someone try to protect consumer s, wouldn’t it? You can sign CAF’s petition here: With Senate Republicans committed to blocking all potential directors of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, congressional Democrats are pressing President Obama to accept reality and offer Elizabeth Warren a recess appointment to head the agency she conceived of. “Regretfully, Republicans in the Senate have now made it clear that they oppose reform,” reads a letter from House Democrats that will be delivered to President Obama. They have vowed that they will not allow consideration of any nominee to head the CFPB until the bureau is weakened. They would rather hold your appointment hostage and obstruct the process than make sure consumers have a strong advocate on their side.Since Republican Senators have said that no one is acceptable unless the law is weakened, we would urge you to nominate Professor Warren as the CFPB’s first Director anyway. If Republicans in the Senate indeed refuse to consider her, we request that you use your constitutional authority to make her a recess appointment. The letter was authored by Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Keith Ellison (D-MN), and Brad Miller (D-NC), who are collecting signatures from their colleagues. The CFPB was created as part of the recently enacted Wall Street reform bill, over significant opposition from Republicans and influential industry players, to protect consumers from predatory financial practices. President Obama appointed Warren to stand up the agency in an advisory capacity ahead of the 2010 election. But it will soon migrate from the Treasury Department to be housed within the Federal Reserve, and will need Senate-confirmed director to officially run the show. Because of objections from Republicans, financial services lobbyists, and even some Democrats, Warren was thought to be unconfirmable, and thus not a likely candidate for the nomination . However, Senate Republicans recently gave Obama a way out. Almost every one of them signed a letter vowing to block any nominee — even a Republican one — until Democrats agreed to weaken the bureau by statute.

Continue reading …
Queen shaken and stirred as Irish tour concludes

Impromptu walkabout in Cork wins new friends, as Sinn Féin is ridiculed for censuring member who shook hand The Queen has concluded her highly successful first official visit to Ireland with an impromptu walkabout in Cork, greeting hundreds of cheering children and shopworkers. Earlier, during a visit to the medieval castle and cathedral at the Rock of Cashel, one of the country’s most historic sites, she even found a Sinn Féin representative willing to meet her and shake her hand: the mayor, Michael Browne. He breached party conventions that members should not meet the monarch and earned criticism for doing so. He claimed it was his civic duty to do it. “I just shook hands with her … I just said ‘Welcome to Cashel your majesty and I hope you enjoy your stay’. No more, no less.” The party has been much criticised for refusing to meet the Queen and ridiculed for its stance, with suggestions that it would never be satisfied, whatever happened. Her popularity appears to have disconcerted it. Muiris O Súilleabháin, Sinn Féin’s South Tipperary spokesman, said: “Party members in Tipperary were surprised by Michael Browne’s action, especially as he recently signed a statement against the English queen’s visit to the Rock of Cashel. “The visit of the English queen to Ireland is premature and we are opposed to it. Elected members should not attend any of the events related to it.” Despite that, the Queen met plenty of Irish people who were prepared to cheer her. In Cork several thousand turned out, drowning a protest by hundreds of opponents, who were kept out of earshot across the river that divides the town. She and the Duke of Edinburgh toured the English market, a historic covered area of food shops, joking with the shopkeepers. Fishmonger Pat O’Connell said: “She was absolutely superb. She is easy to talk to, and has got a great sense of humour. “She got a huge welcome here. I am very proud to be a market trader, and very proud to be a Cork man.” Outside the market, the Queen unexpectedly plunged towards the waiting crowd opposite, smiling and chatting to individuals. Rosemary Williams of Clonakilty said: “It says a lot for Cork that the threat was perceived to be less here. She is purely wonderful.” Jim Daly, principal of St Oliver’s School in Cork, who brought dozens of children to see the royal visitor, said: “The Queen came and said hello to the children and we were absolutely thrilled. “It’s a day they will remember all the days of their lives, and will tell their children and grandchildren about. “From the very moment the Queen stepped out of the plane on Tuesday wearing the colours of our country, and going to the Garden of Remembrance, she disarmed us completely. “All of us, on both sides of the divide, it has helped us reappraise our history and our culture. Her visit will go a long, long way to healing the wounds of past years.” Royal officials and Irish ministers have been thrilled at the outcome of the visit. Protests have been very muted and there has been much favourable comment about the 85-year-old’s feistiness and the obvious sincerity of her acknowledgement of past wrongs and the respects she paid at the country’s remembrance garden. Its success follows close behind that of the royal wedding three weeks ago and just in advance of Barack Obama’s arrival at Buckingham Palace for a state visit on Tuesday. The Queen Monarchy Ireland Europe Sinn Féin Stephen Bates guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …