Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1068)
Maher: GOP Primary Voters Want Misogynist, Racist, Homophobic Presidential Candidate

Bill Maher on Friday once again spent much of his “Real Time” program on HBO bashing conservatives. During his final “New Rule,” he accused Republican primary voters of wanting a presidential candidate who's misogynist, racist, and homophobic (video follows with transcript and commentary): BILL MAHER: Now, in light of these criteria, here are the only people as I see as being acceptable candidates for the Republican base. After suggesting Charlie Sheen – “He’s got the Trump swagger and the Bachmann IQ” – and Ted Nugent, Maher sank to new depths: MAHER: Andrew Dice Clay. For decades, he's been called a misogynist, racist, and homophobic — or what Republican primary voters call a good start. He was inexplicably popular at the same time Ronald Reagan was inexplicably popular, and speaks in a vernacular that the Republican base understands – nursery rhymes. So Maher not only went after Republican candidates with this joke, he also attacked voters. For the record, HBO is owned by Time Warner, a media conglomerate that includes CNN and Time magazine. Do you need any more information about this corporation to understand why it's acceptable for one of its employees to attack fellow Americans – i.e. potential customers! – on national television?

Continue reading …
Conservatives risking reputation on law and order, say ministers

Senior Tories have raised concerns that police protests against coalition policies will damage reputation crime and immigration Senior Tories have raised concerns that the party is risking its reputation for being strong on law and order as the police unveiled plans for a summer campaign of protest against coalition cuts. Officers from more than 40 forces will put their case against the government’s cost-cutting and wider changes, at a meeting in parliamenton Monday, while the Police Federation, which represents the rank and file, has announced a national “day of action” in July aimed at derailing the current policies. David Davis, the Conservatives’ former home affairs spokesman, expressed fears that the party was in danger of losing its reputation for being tough on crime and that public confidence was being dented by cuts to the police and justice systems combined with new liberal sentencing policies. After a week in which the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, caused a storm over proposals to offer shorter sentences to rapists who confessed at an early stage, Davis said: “There is a serious risk that the Conservative party will lose its clear 20 to 30 point opinion poll leads [over Labour] on crime and immigration if it does not take a clearer stance on these issues.” At the same time, Labour moved swiftly to fill what it believes is a policy void. The party’s home affairs spokeswoman, Yvette Cooper, pledged to set up an independent commission on the future of the police – while it is still in opposition – if ministers continue to refuse to do so. The independent commission would draw on evidence from police officers past and present as well as law officers and academics. The Police Federation, which represents 138,000 officers, said it had never experienced such dire relations with any government. Its president, Paul McKeever, said: “It’s the most difficult time anybody has ever faced in the lifetime of the federation.” In a sign that police were happy to work with Labour, McKeever offered his full support to Cooper’s proposals. “We will be speaking to her about it. [Labour's] heart is clearly in the right place in relation to understanding the need for a review. It’s encouraging to see that there are people within parliament who are actually listening.” He also revealed the first details of a rolling programme of protests, including a “major event” in July. The events would culminate in officers targeting the Conservative and Liberal Democrat party conferences this autumn if the plans have not been dropped or drastically changed. The federation says that spending cuts totalling 20% over four years will lead to the loss of 20,000 jobs. These concerns, and those on pay and working conditions, will be aired in parliament during a meeting hosted by the Labour MP Keith Vaz, chair of the home affairs select committee. The emergency meeting, to debate the future of policing, will begin with an introduction by McKeever and hear concerns over the Winsor review , which is examining police pay and conditions, and ways to tackle bureaucracy as part of the committee’s inquiry into policing. The Observer has also learned that David Cameron and George Osborne, the chancellor, are deeply worried that the need to cut back on the police, prisons and wider criminal justice budgets is making it near-impossible to maintain the Tory reputation for law and order. A senior source said that officials from No

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck makes fun of apocalypse warnings — because they’re not his

Click here to view this media Glenn Beck actually opened his show yesterday making fun of the people getting ready for today’s scheduled Rapture and general apocalypse. Which at first struck me as a bit odd, considering that Beck has such a penchant for apocalyptic warnings himself. This kind of stuff, in fact, was a staple of Beck’s even at CNN. You may remember, for instance, his segment with Pastor John Hagee where they explored whether or not Barack Obama is the antichrist. And when he switched to Fox, it intensified. Indeed, from the very outset of his time at Fox, Beck has been basically the network’s Apocalypse Now Hour. For instance, there was the show where he explored the End of Days with a fundamentalist “scholar” named Joel Rosenberg : Click here to view this media That was followed shortly by the infamous segment on the ‘War Room,’ where Beck and guests discussed various apocalyptic scenarios for America: Click here to view this media Of course, that one inspired a truly classic response from Stephen Colbert. So maybe it was worth it. And it has been that way ever since. He’s been incessantly warning America to prepare their doom bunkers, buy gold and guns, and get ready for the End, such as in this episode : Click here to view this media More recently, Beck’s entire Mideast Caliphate Theory was carefully tailored to neatly merge with the apocalyptic scenarios he discussed with Rosenberg. Click here to view this media The truth is that Beck is in the same line of business as Pastor Harold Camping . They’re actually competitors. He’s only dissing the Camping camp because they aren’t selling Beck’s apocalyptic theories.

Continue reading …
Glenn Beck makes fun of apocalypse warnings — because they’re not his

Click here to view this media Glenn Beck actually opened his show yesterday making fun of the people getting ready for today’s scheduled Rapture and general apocalypse. Which at first struck me as a bit odd, considering that Beck has such a penchant for apocalyptic warnings himself. This kind of stuff, in fact, was a staple of Beck’s even at CNN. You may remember, for instance, his segment with Pastor John Hagee where they explored whether or not Barack Obama is the antichrist. And when he switched to Fox, it intensified. Indeed, from the very outset of his time at Fox, Beck has been basically the network’s Apocalypse Now Hour. For instance, there was the show where he explored the End of Days with a fundamentalist “scholar” named Joel Rosenberg : Click here to view this media That was followed shortly by the infamous segment on the ‘War Room,’ where Beck and guests discussed various apocalyptic scenarios for America: Click here to view this media Of course, that one inspired a truly classic response from Stephen Colbert. So maybe it was worth it. And it has been that way ever since. He’s been incessantly warning America to prepare their doom bunkers, buy gold and guns, and get ready for the End, such as in this episode : Click here to view this media More recently, Beck’s entire Mideast Caliphate Theory was carefully tailored to neatly merge with the apocalyptic scenarios he discussed with Rosenberg. Click here to view this media The truth is that Beck is in the same line of business as Pastor Harold Camping . They’re actually competitors. He’s only dissing the Camping camp because they aren’t selling Beck’s apocalyptic theories.

Continue reading …
Omission Watch: Job Creation Staggering at ‘Slowest Post-Recession Rate Since Great Depression’

Here’s more figures suggesting most media outlets are skipping around the bad economic news. On the front of Friday’s USA Today was this story by Dennis Cauchon: Nearly two years after the economic recovery officially began, job creation continues to stagger at the slowest post-recession rate since the Great Depression. The nation has 5% fewer jobs today — a loss of 7 million — than it did when the recession began in December 2007. That is by far the worst performance of job generation following any of the dozen recessions since the 1930s. In the past, the economy recovered lost jobs 13 months on average after a recession. If this were a typical recovery, nearly 10 million more people would be working today than when the recession officially ended in June 2009…. This unique recession has been particularly unfriendly to job-seekers, experts say. “There was too much employment in housing, and that isn't coming back — and frankly shouldn't come back,” says Amar Bhide, a Tufts University professor The housing collapse and productivity gains on the factory floor have made it hard for the economy to absorb workers without a college degree and young people generally, says Carl Camden, president of Kelly Services, a global staffing firm. Manufacturers are producing more value than ever in the USA with a fraction of the workers needed before, he says.

Continue reading …
David Brooks Pans Gingrich For Criticizing Paul Ryan’s ‘Very Serious’ Plan to Gut Medicare

Click here to view this media Why is it every time we hear the word “serious” it always means sticking it to the working class and the poor? David Brooks takes his turn throwing Newt Gingrich under the bus during this segment on the PBS Newshour for daring to call Paul Ryan’s plan to turn Medicare into a voucher system “right-wing social engineering” on Meet the Press last week. While Brooks admits that a lot of Republicans are running scared now after voting for Ryan’s budget plan, he pretends his problem with Gingrich isn’t so much what he said, but the manner in which he said it. I hate to break it to David Brooks, but all the talk in the world of how “serious” that plan is from you and your fellow Villagers isn’t going to make the voters like the idea of getting rid of Medicare. And the problem with what Gingrich said is not how he said it. It’s that he dared to tell the truth. And now that almost every Republican in the House of Representatives has hitched their wagons to Ryan’s plan by voting for it, we can’t have any of that, now can we? Transcript via PBS below the fold. JIM LEHRER: Now, do you agree? I mean, is he damaged beyond repair? DAVID BROOKS: I have always thought he was damaged. I think I mentioned… JIM LEHRER: Sure, before. DAVID BROOKS: … that he — I wouldn’t trust him to run a 7-Eleven. And there’s sort of the reason. Somebody made the point, you have to — always have to use the Newt Gingrich translator for everything he says. So, when he says something is world historical, that means it is sort of moderately important. When he say it is fundamental, that means it is tangential. So, you got to — the bombast meter always has to be ratcheted down six levels. And — but — so, this was just bombastic out of control. But there was a serious element. He is not the only one in the Republican Party who is worried about what Paul Ryan stands for. JIM LEHRER: Yes. DAVID BROOKS: And I happen to think… JIM LEHRER: You mean the Medicare thing. DAVID BROOKS: The Medicare thing. And he has been involved in Medicare in the past when he was speaker. JIM LEHRER: Sure. DAVID BROOKS: And I happen to think one of the important things Ryan did was, he said, if we’re going to be serious, we have to be serious about entitlements. We can’t just be for expanding Medicare coverage forever. But there are people in the party on talk radio and also people like Gingrich who have said, we should never, never touch this. JIM LEHRER: Yes. DAVID BROOKS: And so he was speaking to something serious. He did it in the most damaging way to his party possible.

Continue reading …
Obama wants Cameron to back Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders

US president will use visit to London to keep pressure on Israel for Middle East peace deal Barack Obama will seek a joint Middle East agreement with David Cameron, insisting that a Palestinian state should be based on pre-1967 borders – a proposal rejected by Israel’s prime minister as “unrealistic” and “indefensible”. The issue will be raised in private talks between the two men during the state visit by Obama and his wife to London, only the third by a US president in 100 years. Afghanistan, Libya, relations with Pakistan and the global economy – as well as the vacancy for the top job at the IMF – will also make up the agenda. Despite the outright rejection by the Israeli premier, Binyamin Netanyahu, of a Palestinian state based on the borders that existed before the Six Day War, when Israel captured and occupied the West Bank and Gaza, Obama has already secured the political backing of the United Nations, European Union and Russia who, with America, are collectively known as the “quartet”. Signalling his determination to keep up pressure on Israel, Obama will be looking to enlist the public support of the UK prime minister. The aim is, in large part, to persuade the Palestinian leadership not to go to the UN in September seeking symbolic backing for an independent state. The coming meeting between the two men follows evidence of a hardening of criticism of Israel by London. On the eve of the Obamas’ arrival, Middle East minister Alistair Burt accused Israel of “unhelpful and destabilising activity” in announcing the building of 1,500 new settlement units in East Jerusalem ahead of a speech by the president on the Middle East on Friday. “I am deeply disappointed with Israel’s announcement on 19 May to build up to 1,500 settlement units in the East Jerusalem settlements of Har Homa and Pisgat Ze’ev,” Burt said. “This decision came on the same day as Obama’s important speech on the Middle East, which set out a clear path towards peace between the Palestinians and Israelis. Settlement activity is a recognised obstacle to this path. It is illegal under international law and should stop. “The UK continues to call on Israel to cease unhelpful and destabilising activity and instead help build the conditions that allow meaningful negotiations to resume.” UK sources said they expected a packed agenda, with the two leaders likely to set aside time to discuss the enhanced threat of global terrorism following the death of Osama bin Laden, progress in Afghanistan and the west’s strategy to oust Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya. Away from the formal agenda of talks, the president’s wife, Michelle, and the prime minister’s wife, Samantha, will host a barbecue in the Downing Street garden on Wednesday evening for British and US troops who have served in Afghanistan and Iraq, including some who have suffered injuries. The president and prime minister will attend and lend a hand dishing up the food. “They will be helping with the serving. There will be British sausages and burgers on the menu,” said a spokeswoman. The president and his wife, who will begin their tour of Europe in Ireland on Monday, will stay at Buckingham Palace for the UK leg of the visit, which begins on Tuesday and ends on Thursday. They will be met by the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall before flying to the palace. On Tuesday evening there will be a state dinner at the palace preceded by meetings with Cameron and Labour leader Ed Miliband. Cameron and Obama will hold further talks on Wednesday, when the president will also address both houses of parliament in Westminster Hall. He will lay a wreath at the Grave of the Unknown Soldier in Westminster Abbey. Liberal Democrat sources expressed frustration yesterday at reports that Nick Clegg had been “snubbed” by the president. The Lib Dems say it was made clear that US protocol did not allow for the president to have a bilateral meeting with the Liberal leader in his role as deputy prime minister. Barack Obama Palestinian territories Israel David Cameron Nick Clegg Middle East US foreign policy United States Peter Beaumont Toby Helm guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Syria’s defiant women risk all to protest against President Bashar al-Assad

Women on the frontline of demonstrations against Syria’s brutal regime are now being targeted by security forces They came for the men first, as the security forces of Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad killed, beat and arrested people protesting against his regime. Next, they came for the women of Syria’s revolution. Despite the threats, however, they refuse to be silenced. As the violence has become worse, women activists have organised a Friday protest of Free Women showing solidarity with those seized or killed. Women-only protests in towns across the country have led the effort to let the outside world know what is happening in Syria. But they are now being targeted as well, with the same lethal brutality. Two weeks ago three women were shot dead at an all-women march near the besieged city of Banias. A week later human rights activist Catherine al-Talli, 32, was detained in the Barzeh district of Damascus after being forced off a minibus when it was stopped at a checkpoint by the secret police. Others, such as Razan Zeitouneh, whose husband has been arrested, have been forced into hiding as evidence emerges that the regime is targeting relatives of those it is seeking to arrest. Yesterday it was Zeitouneh who reported that the final death toll for the latest crackdown on Friday protests by the regime had been 30. Twelve were reported dead in Ma’aret al-Nu’man, south of Syria’s second city Aleppo, after tanks entered the town earlier in the day to disperse protesters; 11 in the central city of Homs and seven in Deraa, Latakia, the Damascus suburbs and Hama. “Reem” – we have changed her name to protect her family – spoke to the Observer from Syria last week. Aged 22, she is expecting her first child in the next few weeks. Her husband, an anti-regime activist, has been arrested twice and is now in detention. Her father was invited to a meeting with a senior member of the regime and detained afterwards. Reem has been arrested once. In common with activist friends, she expects a knock on her door from the security forces at any moment. She is still ready to risk prison by talking about the murderous repression in her country. “I have women friends who have been arrested like me,” she said. “But then they just go out again to protest. One of my friends was arrested for collecting medical supplies for the people in Deraa. She was beaten at the security branch and they forced her to take off her headscarf. She was held for two weeks and released two days ago. “She is very enthusiastic and active. She is getting ready to protest again. The only thing that is keeping me at home right now is that I’m expecting a baby in two weeks.” For now, Reem has to content herself with reporting what she has seen and what she knows, which is dangerous enough in a country where the international media are largely banned. “If you tell the truth,” she said, “there is a big chance of arrest. You risk being beaten and being treated with no dignity.” That treatment was described last week by Dorothy Parvaz, an al-Jazeera journalist who was arrested by the Syrians in Damascus and encountered a number of terrified young women in the security barracks where she was held. Upon her release, Parvaz described how two of the young women she met had simply been plucked off the street for no apparent reason. “One had been there for eight days when I met her,” wrote Parvaz last week. “And she looked ill. The food we were given three times a day – fetid, random and at times rotting – mostly had the effect of making her vomit, but she was too hungry to stop eating .” Reem has an explanation for the detention of these young women. “They have been arresting anyone with a phone they see in the streets,” she said. “They do not want anyone to take pictures, to tell the world what is happening.” Reem describes seeing one young woman being dragged by security forces into a shop at a demonstration. “We saw a young girl and some security men in civilian clothes. They grabbed her by the head and dragged her off, calling her a traitor. She said: ‘I’m not a traitor!’ They pulled her into a shop and we tried to reach her, but they shut the door on us and then took her somewhere else. “Women have played a really important role since the first protests in March – non-violent activists like myself and the mothers and sisters of prisoners of conscience.” And the part women are playing has become ever more important. “In some areas,” says Ameera, a human rights lawyer, “so many of the men have been killed, arrested or injured it is the women who have been left to protest. The biggest problem is trying to find the people who have disappeared. The security forces won’t say where they are, and the families are afraid to speak out.” For some – like Ameera – the threat has succeeded in persuading them to stay at home. She now feels unable to protest. “It feels like you are waiting for your turn to be arrested. I am expecting to be arrested at any moment. I am not scared for myself, but I am afraid for my family.” Arab and Middle East unrest Women in politics Bashar Al-Assad Syria Middle East Gender Women Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Netanyahu’s rejection of Obama’s 1967 border deal leaves peace talks in tatters

Palestinians describe fresh talks as pointless following Israel’s dismissal of Barack Obama’s call for a return to prewar frontier Senior Palestinian officials declared peace negotiations with Israel were “pointless” after the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, rejected Barack Obama’s call to base Middle East border talks on the pre-1967 war lines. Amid growing evidence of a deepening crisis in the stalled peace process, Fatah officials also indicated that they would defy Obama’s calls not to seek UN recognition of Palestine as an independent state – a move that the US president has warned against following Fatah’s reconciliation with the Islamic militant organisation Hamas. The comments from Nabil Shaath and Saeb Erekat, both aides to Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, follow the rejection by Netanyahu of Obama’s call for a Palestine based broadly on pre-1967 borders. Instead, Netanyahu has said that Israel views the US proposal as “unrealistic” and “indefensible”. Underlining its rejection last week, on the eve of Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, Israel announced it intends to build 1,500 new housing units in east Jerusalem. The Palestinian remarks came as it emerged that Obama’s border proposal had the backing of the UN, the EU and Russia – leaving Netanyahu increasingly isolated in his hawkish stance. Prospects of any meaningful resumption of peace talks have become more distant in recent weeks as the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas, signed a deal to end the long-running tensions between them, and Israel insisted it cannot negotiate with a government which includes Hamas. Abbas has not given his official response to the parameters for a Middle East peace deal that Obama laid out, and it remains unclear whether the Palestinian leader would now consider abandoning the UN bid. Since the speech, Abbas has been consulting by phone with Arab leaders. He was due to meet with Jordan’s King Abdullah II and then convene the leaders of the PLO and his Fatah movement later in the week before giving a response, Erekat said. In his speech, Obama said that border talks must be held on the basis of Israel’s frontiers in 1967, before it captured the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem. The Palestinians want to establish their state in the territories Israel has occupied since that war. Recognition of the 1967 line as the starting point, while allowing for mutually agreed land swaps, has been a long-standing Palestinian demand. A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said endorsing the pre-1967 ceasefire line was done in the hopes of dissuading the Palestinians from going ahead with their UN plan. Obama warned in his speech that their UN bid would be pointless and said he expected more explanation from Abbas about his reconciliation with Hamas, which refuses to recognise Israel. Erekat said Netanyahu’s statements make it clear the Israeli leader is not a partner for peace, suggesting there is no point in returning to negotiations. “I don’t think we can talk about a peace process with a man who says the 1967 lines are an illusion, that Jerusalem will be the capital of Israel, undivided, and he does not want a single [Palestinian] refugee to go back,” Erekat said. “What is left to negotiate?” Erekat said it was too soon to say whether the Palestinians would still seek UN recognition in September. A bid to become a UN member requires approval not just from the general assembly, where the Palestinians might win the majority needed, but also from the UN security council, where the US might veto such a step. However, Shaath said: “We will escalate our diplomatic efforts to get the recognition of the Palestinian state.” He noted that Obama had not threatened a veto: “We still hope that he will not do so, and that he will not stand in our way to freedom and independence, which he called for all the Arab nations.” Palestinian territories Binyamin Netanyahu Barack Obama Israel United States Middle East US foreign policy Washington DC Hamas Fatah Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Children growing weaker as computers replace outdoor activity

Modern life is ‘producing a generation of weaklings’, claims research as physical strength declines in 10-year-olds Children are becoming weaker, less muscular and unable to do physical tasks that previous generations found simple, research has revealed. As a generation dedicated to online pursuits grows up, 10-year-olds can do fewer sit-ups and are less able to hang from wall bars in a gym. Arm strength has declined in that age group, as has their ability to grip an object firmly. The findings, published in the child health journal Acta Paediatrica , have led to fresh concern about the impact on children’s health caused by the shift away from outdoor activities. Academics led by Dr Gavin Sandercock, a children’s fitness expert at Essex University, studied how strong a group of 315 Essex 10-year-olds in 2008 were compared with 309 children the same age in 1998. They found that: ■ The number of sit-ups 10-year-olds can do declined by 27.1% between 1998 and 2008 ■ Arm strength fell by 26% and grip strength by 7% ■ While one in 20 children in 1998 could not hold their own weight when hanging from wall bars, one in 10 could not do so in 2008. “This is probably due to changes in activity patterns among English 10-year-olds, such as taking part in fewer activities like rope-climbing in PE and tree-climbing for fun,” Sandercock said. “Typically, these activities boosted children’s strength, making them able to lift and hold their own bodyweight.” The fact that 10% could not do the wall bars test and another 10% refused to try was “really shocking”, he added. “That probably shows that climbing and holding their own weight was something they hadn’t done before.” Previous research has already shown that children are becoming more unfit, less active and more sedentary and, in many cases, heavier than before. But the new study also found that children in 2008 had the same body mass index (BMI) as those a decade earlier. Lead author Daniel Cohen, of London Metropolitan University, said this meant that, given their declining strength, the bodies of the recent test group are likely to contain more fat and less muscle then their predecessors. “That’s really worrying from a health point of view. It’s good news that their BMI hasn’t risen, but worrying that pound for pound they’re weaker and probably carrying more fat,” said Sandercock. The authors want ministers to reduce their reliance on the National Child Measurement Programme, which surveys primary schoolchildren’s BMI, and introduce fitness testing in all schools – a call made last year by the then-chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson. “Climbing trees and ropes used to be standard practice for children, but school authorities and ‘health and safety’ have contrived to knock the sap out of our children,” said Tam Fry of the Child Growth Foundation . “Falling off a branch used to be a good lesson in picking yourself up and learning to climb better. Now fear of litigation stops the child climbing in the first place.” He added: “Fitness tests may or may not be appropriate, but Sandercock should not be discouraging the use of BMI measurements.” A Department of Health spokeswoman said the government had introduced several programmes promoting active lifestyles among the young, and the health survey for England reported back on physical activity levels. She added: “The Department of Health has no current plans to introduce fitness testing for children.” Children Health School sports Schools Health & wellbeing Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …