Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1045)

My goodness! Dana Milbank is acting like a real reporter , actually fact-checking the “truthful” Republican presidential hopeful, Tim Pawlenty: “President Obama unfortunately doesn’t have the courage to look the American people in the eye and tell them the tough truth,” Pawlenty informed Matt Lauer on NBC’s “Today” show. “I’ll do that.” In a phone interview with Hot Air blogger Ed Morrissey, he promised “a serious, tell-the-truth, courageous message.” And in Des Moines, Pawlenty delivered an announcement speech, “A Time for Truth,” that contained 16 instances of the word “truth” in the prepared text. But just an hour after unburdening himself of these truths in Iowa, the candidate went on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show and told a bit of a fib. The talk-show host, who serves as the unofficial gatekeeper to the Republican nomination, presented Pawlenty with a 2006 newspaper article in which he said that “the era of small government is over” and that “government has to be more proactive, more aggressive.” The truth-teller beat a hasty retreat. He claimed that he had merely been referencing somebody else’s words — “I didn’t say those words myself” — that his political opponents had “pushed that falsely,” and that the newspaper was motivated by political bias and was forced to issue a correction. To verify Pawlenty’s truthfulness, I looked up the article, from the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and discovered that Pawlenty had taken some liberties with the facts. The article is all about Pawlenty’s efforts as governor to take on drug and oil companies and other practitioners of “excessive corporate power.” It includes his boast that many ideological Republicans “don’t even talk to me anymore” because of his support for things such as the minimum wage. “The era of small government is over,” Pawlenty told the newspaper. “I’m a market person, but there are certain circumstances where you’ve got to have government put up the guardrails or bust up entrenched interests before they become too powerful. . . . Government has to be more proactive, more aggressive.” The newspaper did issue a “clarification,” but only to say that Pawlenty’s quote about small government was “in reference to a point” made by the conservative writer David Brooks — one that Pawlenty, from his other comments, obviously agreed with . Now, the funny thing is, Pawlenty would probably be a better presidential candidate carrying that message. Certainly, there are still Republicans who’d turn out to vote for a Republican candidate who isn’t a right-wing nut case. Unfortunately, the basic requirement for a successful GOP primary candidate is still a noticable measure of insanity, so he’s just going to have to make things up as he goes along.

Continue reading …

My goodness! Dana Milbank is acting like a real reporter , actually fact-checking the “truthful” Republican presidential hopeful, Tim Pawlenty: “President Obama unfortunately doesn’t have the courage to look the American people in the eye and tell them the tough truth,” Pawlenty informed Matt Lauer on NBC’s “Today” show. “I’ll do that.” In a phone interview with Hot Air blogger Ed Morrissey, he promised “a serious, tell-the-truth, courageous message.” And in Des Moines, Pawlenty delivered an announcement speech, “A Time for Truth,” that contained 16 instances of the word “truth” in the prepared text. But just an hour after unburdening himself of these truths in Iowa, the candidate went on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show and told a bit of a fib. The talk-show host, who serves as the unofficial gatekeeper to the Republican nomination, presented Pawlenty with a 2006 newspaper article in which he said that “the era of small government is over” and that “government has to be more proactive, more aggressive.” The truth-teller beat a hasty retreat. He claimed that he had merely been referencing somebody else’s words — “I didn’t say those words myself” — that his political opponents had “pushed that falsely,” and that the newspaper was motivated by political bias and was forced to issue a correction. To verify Pawlenty’s truthfulness, I looked up the article, from the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and discovered that Pawlenty had taken some liberties with the facts. The article is all about Pawlenty’s efforts as governor to take on drug and oil companies and other practitioners of “excessive corporate power.” It includes his boast that many ideological Republicans “don’t even talk to me anymore” because of his support for things such as the minimum wage. “The era of small government is over,” Pawlenty told the newspaper. “I’m a market person, but there are certain circumstances where you’ve got to have government put up the guardrails or bust up entrenched interests before they become too powerful. . . . Government has to be more proactive, more aggressive.” The newspaper did issue a “clarification,” but only to say that Pawlenty’s quote about small government was “in reference to a point” made by the conservative writer David Brooks — one that Pawlenty, from his other comments, obviously agreed with . Now, the funny thing is, Pawlenty would probably be a better presidential candidate carrying that message. Certainly, there are still Republicans who’d turn out to vote for a Republican candidate who isn’t a right-wing nut case. Unfortunately, the basic requirement for a successful GOP primary candidate is still a noticable measure of insanity, so he’s just going to have to make things up as he goes along.

Continue reading …
How Much Does $500,000 Buy? Imagining Newt Gingrich’s Tiffany Trove

How did the Republican presidential hopeful rack up $500,000 in debt at a posh jeweler? NewsFeed has some ideas.

Continue reading …
Chris Huhne questioned by police over speeding claim

Cabinet minister interviewed by Essex police over allegations he passed speeding penalty points on to someone else Cabinet minister Chris Huhne and another person, believed to be his ex-wife, Vicky Pryce, have been interviewed by police over allegations he tried to pass speeding points on to someone else in March 2003. Huhne is battling to save his reputation in the face of accusations by his wife that he made her accept the points. At the weekend, Pryce piled further pressure on Huhne when she released a copy of her driving licence to a Sunday newspaper showing that she had received three points on 12 March 2003. Huhne denies the allegations. On Tuesday Essex police said: “We can confirm that two individuals have been interviewed today at police stations in Essex and London in respect of allegations regarding a speeding offence.” The force did not confirm whether either interview was carried out under caution, but stressed no arrests had been made. A spokeswoman for Huhne said: “Chris Huhne helped Essex police with their inquiries today and looks forward to an early resolution of this issue.” Chris Huhne Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Huhne questioned by police over speeding claim

Cabinet minister interviewed by Essex police over allegations he passed speeding penalty points on to someone else Cabinet minister Chris Huhne and another person, believed to be his ex-wife, Vicky Pryce, have been interviewed by police over allegations he tried to pass speeding points on to someone else in March 2003. Huhne is battling to save his reputation in the face of accusations by his wife that he made her accept the points. At the weekend, Pryce piled further pressure on Huhne when she released a copy of her driving licence to a Sunday newspaper showing that she had received three points on 12 March 2003. Huhne denies the allegations. On Tuesday Essex police said: “We can confirm that two individuals have been interviewed today at police stations in Essex and London in respect of allegations regarding a speeding offence.” The force did not confirm whether either interview was carried out under caution, but stressed no arrests had been made. A spokeswoman for Huhne said: “Chris Huhne helped Essex police with their inquiries today and looks forward to an early resolution of this issue.” Chris Huhne Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Huhne questioned by police over speeding claim

Cabinet minister interviewed by Essex police over allegations he passed speeding penalty points on to someone else Cabinet minister Chris Huhne and another person, believed to be his ex-wife, Vicky Pryce, have been interviewed by police over allegations he tried to pass speeding points on to someone else in March 2003. Huhne is battling to save his reputation in the face of accusations by his wife that he made her accept the points. At the weekend, Pryce piled further pressure on Huhne when she released a copy of her driving licence to a Sunday newspaper showing that she had received three points on 12 March 2003. Huhne denies the allegations. On Tuesday Essex police said: “We can confirm that two individuals have been interviewed today at police stations in Essex and London in respect of allegations regarding a speeding offence.” The force did not confirm whether either interview was carried out under caution, but stressed no arrests had been made. A spokeswoman for Huhne said: “Chris Huhne helped Essex police with their inquiries today and looks forward to an early resolution of this issue.” Chris Huhne Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chris Huhne questioned by police over speeding claim

Cabinet minister interviewed by Essex police over allegations he passed speeding penalty points on to someone else Cabinet minister Chris Huhne and another person, believed to be his ex-wife, Vicky Pryce, have been interviewed by police over allegations he tried to pass speeding points on to someone else in March 2003. Huhne is battling to save his reputation in the face of accusations by his wife that he made her accept the points. At the weekend, Pryce piled further pressure on Huhne when she released a copy of her driving licence to a Sunday newspaper showing that she had received three points on 12 March 2003. Huhne denies the allegations. On Tuesday Essex police said: “We can confirm that two individuals have been interviewed today at police stations in Essex and London in respect of allegations regarding a speeding offence.” The force did not confirm whether either interview was carried out under caution, but stressed no arrests had been made. A spokeswoman for Huhne said: “Chris Huhne helped Essex police with their inquiries today and looks forward to an early resolution of this issue.” Chris Huhne Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Yemen locked in power struggle as fighting escalates

• At least 9 killed in shootout in capital • Activists fear violence will eclipse protest movement Security forces loyal to Yemen’s president Ali Abdullah Saleh were locked in fierce gun battles on Tuesday in the capital Sana’a with guards from the country’s most powerful tribal federation whose leader is backing protesters’ demands for an end to the premier’s 33-year rule. At least 4 soldiers and 5 tribesmen were killed and 24 injured in the skirmishes, dimming the prospects for a negotiated solution to Yemen’s political impasse. The shootout, which pitted Saleh’s central security forces against guards of Sadiq al-Ahmar, head of the Hashid tribal federation from which Saleh also hails, took place in sandbagged streets surrounding Ahmar’s fortified compound, near several government ministries and the ruling party’s headquarters. Bullets fizzed through the air and plumes of black smoke rose from shattered houses as the two sides fired machine guns and shells at each other in a heavily–populated residential area in the east of the capital. A stray missile thudded into a mosque sending clouds of dust into the air and residents fleeing in panic. As the fighting raged on into the evening, the opposition tribesmen began to advance, barricading main roads and sealing off several government buildings including the interior ministry. The estimated 500 tribal fighters are thought to be directing their assault from the Yemenia Airways office. Local residents, most of whom have been evacuated from the area, say the violence was sparked “randomly” when Ahmar’s guards tried to enter a primary school, claiming that Saleh’s troops had been using it to stockpile weapons. Others have accused Saleh, who recently backed away from signing a Saudi-led deal for his exit, of deliberately stirring the violence. In a statement on Tuesday, Yemen’s opposition members said that Saleh, who is facing mounting pressure from the west to quit office, was trying to spark a “civil war” in an attempt to remain in power. “This is his [Saleh's] last resort,” said Hassan Zaid, a leading opposition figure. “We’re all praying that this doesn’t escalate into a widespread conflict.” The government meanwhile has accused the Ahmar clan of “fomenting unrest” and “exploiting the current troubles in the country”. “The al-Ahmar sons and their gang turned away from the mediation effort and fired rockets and bullets heavily on government installations and citizens’ homes,” the defence ministry said in a statement. Tribal mediators have been scrambling to bring about a swift end to the standoff but have so far been unsuccessful. Marib Press reported late on Tuesday that Ghalib al-Kamish, head of political security and the mediation committee, was severely wounded when a rocket hit Ahmar’s house during a negotiation session. It remains unclear what bearing the clashes will have on the protest movement. Protesters have expressed their concern that their peaceful movement may end up being eclipsed by the armed conflict. “The violence will negatively affect the ongoing protest and will turn the dream of a peaceful revolution into a nightmare of a civil war,” said Ibrahim Mothana, a 22-year-old Yemeni writer and activist. “The protesters will stand firm to keep the uprising going and will never take a violent approach despite the ongoing conflict.” Saleh has resisted intense international pressure to step down. The British Foreign Office minister, Alistair Burt, issued a stinging rebuke, saying Saleh’s refusal to sign an agreement under which he would leave office in 30 days in exchange for immunity from prosecution is “a matter of the deepest regret to the United Kingdom. “Saleh is now isolated from leaders in his own party and the opposition who have demonstrated their commitment to a peaceful transition of power,” he said. The six-nation Gulf Co-operation Council, which has been mediating the negotiations, suspended its efforts indefinitely after Saleh’s latest manoeuvre. Yemen Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Tom Finn guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Obama shows patience in the face of pomp and ping-pong

The US president survived needy Europeans, unseasonably high winds and a high-risk table-tennis match Considering that American presidents have been crossing the Atlantic to rescue ungrateful Europeans for almost a century now, Michelle and Barack Obama showed admirable forbearance in the face of all the pomp, circumstance and table-tennis balls that cash-strapped Britain could hurl at them. It’s not as if the US is omnipotent or awash with funds itself any more. But those Europeans always have their hands out. They cut their own armed forces but expect Washington to provide more hardware to sort out Gaddafi. They mess up their own currency and look to IMF funds to sort out the mess. David Cameron is hoping Obama will endorse his own cuts strategy. He has already lured him into a high-risk table-tennis match. Even in his ancestral home of Moneygall, County Offaly, the president didn’t get any change when he paid cash for the Guinness. Irish rain and Icelandic ash had forced the 1,500-strong White House party to take refuge in London 12 hours early. At the official start of their state visit the president and his wife were now obliged to cope with a show of unseasonably cold wind, sweeping across the Buckingham Palace lawn as if it was the tail-end of the Missouri tornado. The Queen was sensibly dressed, as usual, for the ritual Guard of Honour, but poor Michelle Obama had clearly been told the British were enjoying a warm spring this year. As her husband inspected the 101 members of the 1st battalion of the Scots Guards (“is this all the armed forces they’ve got left?”) she clung to the billowing skirt of her summer dress as if Dominique Strauss-Kahn had been spotted in the bushes. In practical terms, this was the lightest of the Obamas’ six-day European foray. They enjoyed a leisurely start at Winfield House – the US ambassador’s private garden is central London’s biggest after HMQ’s and ambassador Louis Susman is an old Chicago pal. But business before pleasure. Who should arrive in their Roller to break up the schmooze, but Prince Charles and Camilla – who had been planning to greet Obama and his wife at Stansted, had volcanic ash not intervened on the flightplan. Obama took the precaution of talking to White House reporters (an essential component of the imperial travelling court) about the devastating tornado in Joplin, Missouri. The couple then left for the palace in “The Beast,” the president’s armour-plated limo – it can withstand a direct hit by a missile or Sarah Palin – and their 15-car convoy, modest by Washington standards, slipped through London, assisted by the 5,000 Met police officers earning overtime. The combination of Britain’s hereditary monarch and America’s elected version is enough to make otherwise sane TV reporters quite light-headed. All day they assured their viewers that the Obamas – who came up the hard way and have good reason to be cool towards Britain, as most of the 43 previous presidents did not – already feel London is a second home. On the strength of two or three meetings their strong mutual affection for the Queen, 85, and her consort, 89, is an established TV fact. What do they talk about? The countryside, gardening and clothes, according to one report. There may even be a germ of truth in it, for they are all gracious people, even the Duke on his best behaviour. “Nice to see you, sir,” said the president after clasping the Queen in a prolonged double handshake. No hugs from Mrs Obama on this occasion. In any case, there was an extra attraction. The Obamas may be relative newcomers to palace life, but the former Kate Middleton still needs help finding the loos. So up she popped in the stately 1844 room, the new Duchess of Cambridge newly-returned from honeymoon with her spouse. People addressed as “Duke” in Chicago are usually jazzmen, but Prince William is a helicopter pilot. They talked privately for 20 minutes, a gaffe-free debut unless the tabloids had the room wired. But Kate was seen to touch her tummy. That will do for the media pack. The day’s stately progress proceeded to plan, albeit with added wind and looming ash: the Guard of Honour with the band playing The Star Spangled Banner (it celebrates a defeat for the British in the war of 1812), lunch and a quick tour of the Royal Collection, escorted by the boss herself. Poring over details of the loss the 13 American colonies (“America is lost” noted George III) Obama dismissed it as “a temporary blip in the relationship”. Brits are neurotically sensitive about the “special relationship,” so there must have been relief all round. Out of intensive care until the next imagined snub. Appropriate gifts were exchanged – including copies of Queen Victoria’s lively letters to successive presidents – without the kind of incident that almost led to war when Gordon Brown gave the president all Britain’s gold reserves and in return was given DVDs and a family meal voucher for McDonalds. Prince Charles got some seeds to talk to. Spot on! David Cameron had briefly to be fitted in, so did Ed Miliband. But what with the trip to Westminster Abbey – laying a wreath on the tomb of the unknown warrior is de rigueur for state visits – they started running late. In his reflective moment as the choir sang, did Obama have time to recall that Harry Truman, the first US president his royal host had met, was once a frontline soldier in that war? Obama (he’s got a lot on his mind) signed the visitors book “May 24, 2008.” Undeterred the crowds outside called “we love you, we love you,” in sharp contrast to the jeers which hounded George W Bush in 2003. Those Europeans prefer Democrats to cowboys. Cameron further slowed progress by shipping his visitor off to the Globe Academy (opened by Ed Balls in 2008) in Southwark, surely not to cramp Miliband’s moment? No, even Tory posh boys are aware of the Obama CV which makes them keener than ever to trumpet social mobility, not one of the Queen’s strongest suits. They risked being photographed playing table tennis, normally a no-win situation for politicians, even if the host gallantly loses on purpose. This time the pair cunningly played pupils and high-fived their best shots. Handy material for the election file, a win-win after all for the “essential relationship.” No table tennis for Miliband, but he had his meeting in the end, searching for some reflected Obama optimism to share. After that a quick shower for the visitors in Buck House’s Belgian Suite – named after Africa’s most notorious colonialist regime – and that state dinner. What could possibly go wrong? In the Europe of 2011, anything. Barack Obama Europe Michael White guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Herman Cain gets a Hannity Job: Softball interview lets him admit he was clueless about issue he attacked Obama on

Click here to view this media Tea Partying wingnut candidate Herman Cain — who was caught looking like an idiot this weekend for wading into the Israel-Palestine debate and demonstrating his utter cluelessness with Chris Wallace — got to have a Fox News do-over last night by getting himself a Hannity Job : “one of those appearances where Sean strokes you, tosses you a bunch of softballs, and lets you promote your campaign and issue non-answers whenever you like.” It was a nice try, of sorts. Basically Cain admitted he was stumped by Wallace’s question and caught flat-footed. But hey, he’s all studied up on it now. (And from a reliable source, no doubt.) CAIN: The thing that you gonna learn about Herman Cain, if he doesn’t know something, he’s not going to try and fake it or give an answer that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Now here’s the thing that I have learned about the right of return since Sunday. It wasn’t that they were kicked out of Israel by the Jews, no. Their Arab leaders asked them to leave… So yes, I still stick by my answer – it is the responsibility and the decision to be made by Israel. As Ellen at NewsHounds points out, that’s the kind of lameness we’ve come to expect from this Republican field of stiffs, blowhards and half-wits: Well, the thing we really learned about Herman Cain is that he’s a knee-jerk pro-Israel supporter willing to attack President Obama’s Middle East policy without knowing what he’s talking about. Before he asked about right of return, Wallace noted that Cain had accused Obama of throwing Israel “under the bus” with his suggestion that Israel return to 1967 borders. Cain reiterated that stance, saying he’d offer nothing to the Palestinians “to make peace.” And yet, when asked about the right of return, Cain said, “That’s something that should be negotiated.” He also said, “Yes, they (Palestinians) should have a right to come back, if that is a decision that Israel wants to make.” If Cain knew anything about Israel’s policies, he’d have known that that’s a decision Israel has already made – against the right of return. So, the Cain campaign issued a statement last night trying to walk back and recast his answer to make it look as though Cain knew what he was talking about. … Now on Hannity, Cain was arguing that he originally knew nothing about a long-standing key point of contention between Israel and Palestine but 24 hours later had gotten up to speed on the whole thing. Not surprisingly, none of these contradictions were explored by Hannity.

Continue reading …