I can’t tell you how much this cheers me up . The federal education “reform” juggernaut is flattening everything in its way, and it’s so heartening to see someone like Jerry Brown step up and say, “Sorry, fellas, this won’t work.” enlarge California Governor Jerry Brown has taken a big step towards reducing the testing mania in the nation’s most populous state. Up until his administration we have been on an accelerated path towards the comprehensive data-driven system that test publishers and corporate reformers have convinced leaders is needed to improve schools. But in the May budget outline from Brown’s office, he makes it clear he is putting on the brakes. From the Thoughts on Public Education blog comes this: Gov. Jerry Brown is proposing to suspend funding for CALPADS, the state student longitudinal data system, and to stop further planning for CALTIDES, the teacher data base that was to be joined at the hip with CALPADS. What is even more encouraging is the explanation Brown offers, which shows a great deal of understanding of these issues. The document states: A number of problems have been identified with California’s state testing, data collection and accountability regime. Testing takes huge amounts of time from classroom instruction. Data collection requirements are cumbersome and do not provide timely – and therefore usable – information back to schools. Teachers are forced to cub their own creativity and engagement with students as they focus on teaching to the test. State and federal administrators continue to centralize teaching authority far from the classroom. The (Brown) Administration proposes to deal with these issues by carefully reforming testing and accountability requirements to achieve genuine accountability and maximum local autonomy. It will engage teachers, scholars, school administrators and parents to develop proposals to (1) reduce the amount of time devoted to state testing in schools; (2) eliminate data collections that do not provide useful information to school administrators, teachers and parents; and (3) restore power to school administrators, teachers and parents. The goal is to improve the learning environment in every classroom, thereby encouraging the demanding pursuit of excellence. The May Revision proposes to suspend funding for CALPADS in 2011-12 pending this continued review of data collection requirements. Praise be! Jerry Brown is unusual among our nation’s governors. He got a bit more involved than most in on-the-ground school reform while he was serving as mayor of Oakland. He learned the hard way how schools are a reflection of deeper social issues. In a statement he wrote to respond to Arne Duncan’s Race to the Top a year and a half ago, while he was California’s Attorney General, he said: You assume we know how to “turn around all the struggling low performing schools,” when the real answers may lie outside of school. As Oakland mayor, I directly confronted conditions that hindered education, and that were deeply rooted in the social and economic conditions of the community or were embedded in the particular attitudes and situations of the parents. There is insufficient recognition in the draft regulations that inside and outside of school strategies must be interactive and merged. Even more revealing was what he wrote about federally-driven education “reform”: The basic assumption of your draft regulations appears to be that top down, Washington driven standardization is best. This is a “one size fit all” approach that ignores the vast diversity of our federal system and the creativity inherent in local communities. What we have at stake are the impressionable minds of the children of America. You are not collecting data or devising standards for operating machines or establishing a credit score. You are funding teaching interventions or changes to the learning environment that promise to make public education better, i.e. greater mastery of what it takes to become an effective citizen and a productive member of society. In the draft you have circulated, I sense a pervasive technocratic bias and an uncritical faith in the power of social science.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I’m not sure if “Republican strategist” or probably better described, U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbyist , John Feehery meant to actually say this out loud on television, but I think he accidentally told the truth on Hardball. While defending Paul Ryan and the Republican’s plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program as a means of “saving” Medicare, at the very end of the segment Feehery lets one slip with their real priorities. Medicare and our social safety nets must be sacrificed if we want to keep a Department of Defense. So we’ve got to keep pouring billions into these bottomless pits where we invaded countries that were not a threat to us and our so-called “war on terror”, or we gut Medicare. Those are the choices. No raising taxes to pay for invading other countries. No cuts to our military industrial complex. Take it out of the hide of the poor and our seniors instead. We knew these were their priorities already. It’s just unusual to hear one of them actually say it out loud. And as Digby noted on the rest of Feehery’s spin here: This is some great GOP messaging from strategist John Feehery today on Hardball: Feehery: This is the same program that was put out by John Breaux and Bill Thomas back in the 1990s. We have to fix Medicare for the long term. Obviously competition has to be involved with it. Obviously what Paul Ryan has said is, “if you’re under 55 this is something you might have to deal with, if you’re over 55 it’s not gonna touch you.” That’s something that polls very well with seniors. This is a beginning of a conversation. This is a beginning of a conversation and it has to happen. Matthews; You sound desperate. You’re skirting and saying it doesn’t matter if you’re over 55. Feehery: That’s what the plan says, if you’re over 55 it’s not going to impact you. And that’s an important talking point. All the members of congress that I’ve talked to when they go back to their constituents over 55 that sells. Now I don’t happen to think that’s fair. I’m under 55 and if there’s going to be reform I think the old guys have to pay as well, but I’m not running for office so … Read on…
Continue reading …After President Barack Obama nearly became the first victim of the ash cloud last night, The Queen and Prince Phillip welcomed the president and the First Lady on Tuesday as part of a U.K. state visit. As President Obama made his way to Buckingham Palace to be welcomed by her majesty, crowds gathered outside Buckingham Palace,
Continue reading …Chris Hutcheson can be named in a case involving his family after court of appeal partially lifts privacy order A superinjunction obtained by the father-in-law of the television chef Gordon Ramsay has been partially lifted by an order of the court of appeal. Chris Hutcheson failed in an attempt to retain an injunction gagging the press in a case involving his family. The decision is a further setback to the power of privacy orders to restrict reporting and comes on the day after an MP named Ryan Giggs as the footballer identified on Twitter as having brought an injunction to prevent publication of allegations he had an affair. Hutcheson can be named after the court partially lifted anonymity over the legal action. He had appealed against a refusal in December by high court judge Mr Justice Eady to grant him an interim injunction restraining newspapers from publishing “private information”. Hugh Tomlinson QC, for Hutcheson, said the case related to “family issues – conduct which might well be said to be morally blameworthy” but not criminal or regulatory misconduct. Upholding Justice Eady’s decision, the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, said: “We consider he was right to dismiss KGM’s [ Hutcheson's] application for restraint on publication of certain information.” Tomlinson said Hutcheson’s case was that the information he was seeking to keep out of the newspapers was “purely a private matter of concern only to him and a small number of other individuals”. He was “not a public figure, not a premiership footballer” and he did not hold any public office or official position. Hutcheson and his celebrity chef son-in-law parted company last October in a public falling out. The Master of the Rolls, sitting with Lord Justice Etherton and Lord Justice Gross, will consider on Wednesday what material from the high court judgment can now be disclosed to the public. He warned that, until then, details of the judgment must not be published. But he added that newspapers and the media could use information about the case before then if it came “from an independent source”. The appeal court decision was a victory for the publishers of The Sun, Daily Mirror and Daily Mail, which had opposed Hutcheson’s application for a gagging order. Superinjunctions Injunctions Gordon Ramsay Media law Newspapers & magazines Press freedom Newspapers Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The slogan goes, “You never get a second chance to make a first impression.” But the Obamas recovered nicely in their second visit to Buckingham Palace. Social missteps seemed to plague the President and First Lady during their first meeting with Queen Elizabeth II in April 2009. The fashion industry mocked Michelle Obama for wearing
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Former President George W. Bush was almost hit by a foul ball at Monday night’s White Sox vs. Texas Rangers baseball game. White Sox catcher A.J. Pierzynski leaped toward Bush to try to catch the ball but missed. “Just cause he was the president doesn’t mean I wouldn’t jump on top of him,” Pierzynski told Bush, according to Fox’s Orlando affiliate .
Continue reading …When a man tells women they should “plan ahead for rape”, you’d like to think it was a joke. Only, it’s not a joke and the man who said it is a state lawmaker in Kansas . During the House’s debate, Rep. Pete DeGraaf, a Mulvane Republican who supports the bill, told her: “We do need to plan ahead, don’t we, in life?” Bollier asked him, “And so women need to plan ahead for issues that they have no control over with a pregnancy?” DeGraaf drew groans of protest from some House members when he responded, “I have spare tire on my car.” “I also have life insurance,” he added. “I have a lot of things that I plan ahead for.” Ummm. Ok. I really have no snappy comeback to this. As a woman, it deeply offends and infuriates me that any official would suggest that rape and incest are preventable, and that women should take steps to prevent it. It’s reflective of a weirdly ancient man-attitude (largely extinct) that says women are responsible when men can’t control their impulses. It’s amazingly stupid and out of touch. These women (girls) are victims . There is no prevention for this. None. And for a man to stand up and say such an thing in public is, well, hateful. Jezebel.com : Yeah ladies, it’s your responsibility to plan for the possibility of rape. You chose to own a vagina, so you should have all the necessary tools for its upkeep. Being raped is definitely comparable to the brief annoyance of having a flat tire, so let’s keep this up: The state isn’t AAA, so don’t expect it to help you out when you’re breaking down over a devastating accident . Tire slashing? Hmm … maybe this metaphor is actually terrible. But DeGraaf is definitely on target with the rest of his remarks. Rape insurance is just like having life insurance: You’re definitely going to die some day, and DeGraaf thinks you’re definitely going to get raped. Don’t come crying to him if you didn’t prepare to be the victim of a horrific crime! I mean, you can try by contacting his office, but he’s not the first guy I’d look to for help. What’s disturbing about this is how common it’s becoming in debates over abortion. ThinkProgress : Unfortunately, this Boy Scout dismissal of rape and incest victims is as galling as it is common among the GOP. More and more Republican lawmakers are adopting the Sharron Angle “ make lemonade ” attitude towards pregnancies resulting from rape. This year, one Indiana lawmaker even suggested that women would fake their own rapes to secure an abortion procedure. Got that, ladies? We’re second-class citizens who fail to take preventive steps to protect ourselves from men being men. And that’s how we’re represented by right-wingers in Congress. Second-class, subject to the whim of our masters.
Continue reading …Haitians fleeing 2010 earthquake chaos are enduring long journeys and border-town limbo for a fresh start in Brazil Each night they gather on Brazil Avenue under the amber glow of street lamps. Perched on the wall of a convenience store they talk politics, crack jokes, and sing along to mobile phone music from home. As darkness envelops Iñapari, a riverside border town in the Peruvian Amazon, the sound of French Creole and Haitian Compas songs fills the air. “We have come here in search of a better life,” said Baptiste Suppler, a 29-year-old from Haiti’s fourth-largest city, Gonaïves. Suppler is one in a wave of Haitian migrants determined to build a new life in the Brazilian Amazon. He pointed across the river Acre, separating Peru’s Iñapari from the Brazilian border town of Assis Brasil, representing the last hurdle towards a fresh start in South America’s largest and wealthiest nation. “Our objective is to reach Brazil,” he added. According to the Brazilian authorities at least 1,500 Haitians have entered the Amazon region since a 7.0 magnitude earthquake devastated their country on 12 January 2010, killing about 200,000. After a gruelling, month-long journey via the Dominican Republic, Panama, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru and sometimes Colombia, Haitian migrants arrive at remote border towns like Iñapari and wait for the chance to cross into the Brazilian Amazon. Once there many try to find construction jobs on Amazonian infrastructure projects, such as the Santo Antonio and Jirau hydroelectric dams. “I chose Brazil, and many Haitians choose Brazil, because in 2014 there will be a World Cup,” said Esdras Hector, who left Haiti on 11 March and made it to the Brazilian Amazon on 15 April after a four-week pilgrimage by plane, bus and on foot. “A lot of Haitians know Brazil will need a lot of workers to work during this time.” Brazilian authorities have been caught off guard by the sudden influx of Haitians. Unsure how to classify the migrants, federal police officials received orders to refuse entry to new arrivals while a solution was sought, they said. For now, the Brazilian border was closed, theoretically at least. But for the Haitians stranded in Iñapari, many heavily in debt, turning back is not an option. Some bide their time, hoping the border will reopen in a few months; others have already begun hiring coyotes (people smugglers) to guide them on a perilous illegal trek through the jungle into Brazil. “They won’t give up … they are just one step away from realising their dreams,” said Maria Cardozo Mouzully, 49, who owns Hospedaje Iñapari, a riverside guesthouse on the Peruvian side of the border that now houses many Haitians. In the absence of support from the local government, Mouzully ceded many of her hotel rooms and her kitchen to Haitian migrants left in limbo by the decision to seal the border. “What are we supposed to do? Kill them? Watch them starve to death outside our front door?” Go about 71 miles east from Iñapari and you reach Epitaciolândia, a small Brazilian town currently home to about 160 Haitian migrants who reached Brazil before the border closed. Among the mostly male group are university graduates, bricklayers, electricians and preachers, all sleeping on the floor of a gymnasium while waiting for papers letting them stay legally and work. To fill the time they play cards, read the Bible and do odd jobs for ranchers. “[The] disaster destroyed my country,” said Esdras Hector, 27, who hoped to learn Portuguese to land a job with the UN. “I know if I use my brain in Brazil I will realise my dream to help my family.” But for many, attempting to build a new life in Brazil has come at great personal cost. Silvaine Doris, a 46-year-old shampoo seller, who lost her brother and sister in the earthquake, left her daughter aged seven and 11-year-old son behind in Port-au-Prince in the care of a niece. “As soon as I bought my ticket … I started to cry,” she said. These days her home is the Pousada Sao Jose, a guesthouse in Brasiléia, an Amazonian town near Brazil’s border with Bolivia and Peru. “I’ve come here because of the economic problem. We don’t have anything – no jobs. All we could do was come here in search of a better future.” Haitians represent the largest portion of this new wave of Amazon migrants, but over five days in the region, four men from Bangladesh, one from Liberia and one from Nigeria talked to the Guardian. Pakistani and Tanzanian migrants are also said to have arrived. Peter John Prince, 27, from Liberia, said he was living in Ivory Coast until some months ago when his brother, owner of a sportswear shop, was killed by rebels. “I am a refugee … I had to get away because I don’t want to die.” Beside him stood Frank Jideofor, 23, from Nigeria’s oil-rich Bayelsa state. His left arm was amputated after he was shot by the same men who murdered his father, a government official. Why had he come to Brazil? “For the life-safe. They burnt our house, they shot me … because my father didn’t support them.” Back on Brazil Avenue, Suppler and his fellow Haitian travellers were mulling over the options. “Our situation is difficult. For now, the border is closed.” What would he do? “I will wait.” How long for? He crossed his fingers and looked towards the sky. “Persévérance.” Chasing the dream Throughout much of the 19th and 20th centuries migrant workers flocked to South America chasing the “Brazilian dream”. Foreign workers were widely seen as a key ingredient for economic growth, particularly after Brazil abolished slavery in 1888. Germans were among the first to arrive, colonising large areas of southern Brazil from the 1820s onwards. In some corners of Brazil’s deep south, German is still spoken as a first language. Between the mid-1870s and 1920 as many as 1.5 million Italian immigrants touched down in south and south-east Brazil. Today there are about 25 million Brazilians of Italian descent. Between 1908 and the 1960s up to 250,000 Japanese immigrants arrived, many fleeing rural poverty. The majority set sail for Sao Paulo and went to work in the region’s coffee plantations; others headed for the Amazon. Today Brazil is said to house the largest Japanese population outside Japan. Last year’s census counted at least 2 million Brazilians of Asian descent. Brazil Haiti Natural disasters and extreme weather Peru Migration Tom Phillips guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Coalition appoints pro-abstinence charity Life to key sexual health forum, while omitting British Pregnancy Advisory Service A group which is opposed to abortion in all circumstances and favours an abstinence-based approach to sex education has been appointed to advise the government on sexual health. The Life organisation has been invited to join a new sexual health forum set up to replace the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV. Stuart Cowie, Life’s head of education, said: “We are delighted to be invited into the group, representing views that have not always been around on similar tables in the past.” In contrast, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) has been omitted from the forum despite its long-term position on the previous advisory group and 40-year track record in providing pregnancy counselling nationwide. “We are disappointed and troubled to learn that having initially been invited to the sexual health forum we have been disinvited, particularly now we understand that Life have been offered a seat at the table,” said Ann Furedi, chief executive of BPAS. “We find it puzzling that the Department of Health would want a group that is opposed to abortion and provides no sexual health services on its sexual health forum.” Cowie said Life would seek to build “common ground” with other members of the panel. “If we can be involved with other people in reducing [the number of abortions] then that fits with our charitable objectives and I don’t think is unpalatable to anyone else, regardless of their position on when life begins.” However, Life’s support for greater emphasis on abstinence when it comes to sexual education is likely to be one of a number of areas where it will be a collision course with other members of forum. For example, Life has been critical of literature about contraception which had been distributed by the sexual health charity, Brook. They will sit alongside each other at the forum. Life claimed that teenagers were not being told that condoms only gave partial protection against some STIs (sexually transmitted infections) and little or no protection against others. Brook’s national director, Simon Blake, said its literature was based on clinical evidence and linked the provision of such information to underlying figures from abortion statistics released on Tuesday which showed a reduction in teenage conceptions, despite an overall rise in the number of abortions. The under-18 abortion rate has reduced from 17.6 per 1,000 women in 2009 to 16.5 per 1,000 women in 2010. Blake said: “Having made such massive progress, what we have to do is sustain that … and not go back to a time when the young had really poor sexual and relationship education and see a rise in teenage pregnancy rates and sexually transmitted infections as a result.” The new committee has held one meeting but Life was not represented. The invitation to the group by Anne Milton, the public health minister, appears to have caught some forum members by surprise. It could yet open up another area of disagreement within the coalition. The former Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris, warned on Tuesday night that the organisation’s presence could prevent the panel functioning properly. “When you have an organisation campaigning against the law and against current policy on sexual health, which is pro-contraception and about ensuring that abortion is a choice, then the risk is that you prevent the panel being given access to confidential information,” he said. “It can prevent the advisory panel having frank and open discussions because you have a group there that is committed to opposing current policy.” A Department of Health spokesperson said: “To provide balance, it is important that a wide range of interests and views are represented on the forum. Marie Stopes International and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service have similar interests. We offered them shared membership but they declined, and after careful consideration we concluded that it was not feasible to invite both organisations.” BPAS asserts that the department withdrew the offer of ‘shared membership’. The forum consists of representatives of the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; the Association of Directors of Public Health; the British HIV Association; the Terrence Higgins Trust; Brook; the Family Planning Association; the Sex Education Forum and National Children’s Bureau; Marie Stopes International; and Life. The department said the criteria applied in terms of appointments to the group was that the core membership would be drawn from national level organisations with a remit covering sexual health across England. They also had to be able to demonstrate clear evidence of impact in improving sexual health and must have a sufficient infrastructure to be able to field deputies at a senior level in the organisation. Life also become a founding member last week of a new Sex and Relationships Council, which was launched in parliament with the endorsement of the education secretary, Michael Gove. The council which includes the Christian-run pro-abstinence group the Silver Ring Thing, says it aims to bring the voice of what it describes as “value-based, parent centred” sex and relationship education (SRE) providers to policy discussions on the future of SRE in schools. A total of 189,574 abortions were performed in 2010 – a 0.3% increase on the previous year, the figures released on Tuesday show. Marie Stopes described the rise as small but warned the figures sent a warning for the government’s family planning strategy. “There are three key areas that need to be focused on: education, access and choice,” it said, calling for the delivery of “comprehensive and standardised sex and relationship education in all schools”. In its response to the figures, the Family Planning Association said: “Clearly there needs to be a much better relationship and tighter integration between local contraceptive and abortion services. Despite the advances, women still live in a postcode lottery. Where you live dictates how quickly you’ll get an abortion. This is unacceptable.” Life, which provides its own pregnancy counselling services and describes itself as non-denominational, reacted to the figures by suggesting that a “cooling off” period before abortions could play a role in reducing the number being performed. Some secular organisations have been growing increasingly worried that Tory ministers are opening up government to the agendas of faith-based and pro-life groups. Some of the same groups have already been preparing to capitalise on the government’s big society agenda, which would potentially allow them to replace secular groups in terms of providing services. In Richmond, south-west London, the Catholic Children’s Society has taken over the £89,000 contract to provide advice to schoolchildren on matters including contraception and pregnancies.The Christian-run charity Care Confidential, is involved in providing services crisis pregnancy advice under the auspices of Newham PCT in east London. Care’s education arm, Evaluate, was one of the founding members, alongside Life, of the Sex and Relationships Council. Meanwhile in parliament, the battle lines on abortion are set to be drawn again after cross-party amendments to the health and social care bill were put forward by anti-abortion MPs in a bid to tighten the rules on terminations. The first amendment, put forward by Nadine Dorries and Frank Field, would establish a new precondition for any women having an abortion to receive advice and counselling from an organisation that does not itself carry out terminations. Sexual health Health policy Health Sex education Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Coalition appoints pro-abstinence charity Life to key sexual health forum, while omitting British Pregnancy Advisory Service A group which is opposed to abortion in all circumstances and favours an abstinence-based approach to sex education has been appointed to advise the government on sexual health. The Life organisation has been invited to join a new sexual health forum set up to replace the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV. Stuart Cowie, Life’s head of education, said: “We are delighted to be invited into the group, representing views that have not always been around on similar tables in the past.” In contrast, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) has been omitted from the forum despite its long-term position on the previous advisory group and 40-year track record in providing pregnancy counselling nationwide. “We are disappointed and troubled to learn that having initially been invited to the sexual health forum we have been disinvited, particularly now we understand that Life have been offered a seat at the table,” said Ann Furedi, chief executive of BPAS. “We find it puzzling that the Department of Health would want a group that is opposed to abortion and provides no sexual health services on its sexual health forum.” Cowie said Life would seek to build “common ground” with other members of the panel. “If we can be involved with other people in reducing [the number of abortions] then that fits with our charitable objectives and I don’t think is unpalatable to anyone else, regardless of their position on when life begins.” However, Life’s support for greater emphasis on abstinence when it comes to sexual education is likely to be one of a number of areas where it will be a collision course with other members of forum. For example, Life has been critical of literature about contraception which had been distributed by the sexual health charity, Brook. They will sit alongside each other at the forum. Life claimed that teenagers were not being told that condoms only gave partial protection against some STIs (sexually transmitted infections) and little or no protection against others. Brook’s national director, Simon Blake, said its literature was based on clinical evidence and linked the provision of such information to underlying figures from abortion statistics released on Tuesday which showed a reduction in teenage conceptions, despite an overall rise in the number of abortions. The under-18 abortion rate has reduced from 17.6 per 1,000 women in 2009 to 16.5 per 1,000 women in 2010. Blake said: “Having made such massive progress, what we have to do is sustain that … and not go back to a time when the young had really poor sexual and relationship education and see a rise in teenage pregnancy rates and sexually transmitted infections as a result.” The new committee has held one meeting but Life was not represented. The invitation to the group by Anne Milton, the public health minister, appears to have caught some forum members by surprise. It could yet open up another area of disagreement within the coalition. The former Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris, warned on Tuesday night that the organisation’s presence could prevent the panel functioning properly. “When you have an organisation campaigning against the law and against current policy on sexual health, which is pro-contraception and about ensuring that abortion is a choice, then the risk is that you prevent the panel being given access to confidential information,” he said. “It can prevent the advisory panel having frank and open discussions because you have a group there that is committed to opposing current policy.” A Department of Health spokesperson said: “To provide balance, it is important that a wide range of interests and views are represented on the forum. Marie Stopes International and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service have similar interests. We offered them shared membership but they declined, and after careful consideration we concluded that it was not feasible to invite both organisations.” BPAS asserts that the department withdrew the offer of ‘shared membership’. The forum consists of representatives of the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; the Association of Directors of Public Health; the British HIV Association; the Terrence Higgins Trust; Brook; the Family Planning Association; the Sex Education Forum and National Children’s Bureau; Marie Stopes International; and Life. The department said the criteria applied in terms of appointments to the group was that the core membership would be drawn from national level organisations with a remit covering sexual health across England. They also had to be able to demonstrate clear evidence of impact in improving sexual health and must have a sufficient infrastructure to be able to field deputies at a senior level in the organisation. Life also become a founding member last week of a new Sex and Relationships Council, which was launched in parliament with the endorsement of the education secretary, Michael Gove. The council which includes the Christian-run pro-abstinence group the Silver Ring Thing, says it aims to bring the voice of what it describes as “value-based, parent centred” sex and relationship education (SRE) providers to policy discussions on the future of SRE in schools. A total of 189,574 abortions were performed in 2010 – a 0.3% increase on the previous year, the figures released on Tuesday show. Marie Stopes described the rise as small but warned the figures sent a warning for the government’s family planning strategy. “There are three key areas that need to be focused on: education, access and choice,” it said, calling for the delivery of “comprehensive and standardised sex and relationship education in all schools”. In its response to the figures, the Family Planning Association said: “Clearly there needs to be a much better relationship and tighter integration between local contraceptive and abortion services. Despite the advances, women still live in a postcode lottery. Where you live dictates how quickly you’ll get an abortion. This is unacceptable.” Life, which provides its own pregnancy counselling services and describes itself as non-denominational, reacted to the figures by suggesting that a “cooling off” period before abortions could play a role in reducing the number being performed. Some secular organisations have been growing increasingly worried that Tory ministers are opening up government to the agendas of faith-based and pro-life groups. Some of the same groups have already been preparing to capitalise on the government’s big society agenda, which would potentially allow them to replace secular groups in terms of providing services. In Richmond, south-west London, the Catholic Children’s Society has taken over the £89,000 contract to provide advice to schoolchildren on matters including contraception and pregnancies.The Christian-run charity Care Confidential, is involved in providing services crisis pregnancy advice under the auspices of Newham PCT in east London. Care’s education arm, Evaluate, was one of the founding members, alongside Life, of the Sex and Relationships Council. Meanwhile in parliament, the battle lines on abortion are set to be drawn again after cross-party amendments to the health and social care bill were put forward by anti-abortion MPs in a bid to tighten the rules on terminations. The first amendment, put forward by Nadine Dorries and Frank Field, would establish a new precondition for any women having an abortion to receive advice and counselling from an organisation that does not itself carry out terminations. Sexual health Health policy Health Sex education Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …