I’m not really sure if I’m more incensed at this caller or Limbaugh. After all, I expect Rush to be a big-mouthed toad with mush where his brains should be. But the caller leads this off with the usual “f-ck you, I’ve got mine” attitude when he says this: LIMBAUGH: If you believe the majority of stories we get about the elderly in this country, that they are, for the most part, just a couple steps away from poverty. CALLER: Hi, no, I don’t believe that, and I hate to say this, but if they are a step away from poverty that is their responsibility because they did not save for their future. It is not my responsibility that you spent all of your money and did not save for your future. Let’s just stop right there. This caller is so arrogant and nasty I’d like to wrap Wall Street around his pencil-necked body. Let’s just say for the sake of argument that some seniors actually had investments, and actually had saved for their futures. And let’s also say for the sake of argument that they invested those funds in a fairly conservative portfolio of stocks and bonds. And let’s go one step further and say that when the market started to tank, they yanked their money out of the market at exactly the wrong time, leaving them with cash earning nearly zero interest, and a balance equal to about 60% of what it was worth a year earlier. Whose responsibility would that be? Would it be theirs, or the sharks on Wall Street who played fast and loose with other people’s money? Oh, and we can go even one step farther and say that those seniors who own their homes outright saw their balance sheets fall even faster. If they were unfortunate enough to have a reverse mortgage on their home, well, they and their heirs might just be out of luck now. But yeah, of course that’s their fault. Ok, leaping ahead to about 1:51, we have Rush saying this: LIMBAUGH: Young people are moving back in with them. Their moms and dads! And some of these people moving back in are 35 and 40. How old are their moms and dads? 60 and 70, try. But they’re 60 and 70 and if they can afford their worthless offspring moving back in with them, just how poverty-stricken are they? Gosh, I guess Rush missed the part where people lost their homes, jobs and livelihoods, thanks to the Wall Street marauders. Not everyone can be a right-wing idiotic blowhard like Rush Limbaugh that advertisers are willing to fatten up with big ads because a zillion fools listen to his blowhardiness like it’s Jesus preaching the gospel. Some people have to work for a living, and the longer they are out of work, the harder it is for them to get a job. So really, I’m now raising a middle finger to Rush Limbaugh, and suggest you do too. While you’re at it, aim at the caller, too, because obviously yesterday’s news is something he doesn’t have the brains to remember from one minute to the next. When I hear people like this, I’m ashamed to admit that I truly hope they discover what it feels like to lose it all through no fault of their own, so they can hear white entitled dudes tell them how stupid they were. [h/t Media Matters ]
Continue reading …Liberal radio host Ed Schultz's May 23rd attack on conservative talker Laura Ingraham as a “slut” was “reprehensible” and “could not have been more vile,” NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell told viewers of the May 26 “Hannity.” That said, Bozell added, he should be commended for owning up to his transgression and offering a “man's apology” Wednesday night on his MSNBC “Ed Show” program. “It seemed real to me” and Ingraham accepted his apology, Fox News host Sean Hannity agreed, but noted a double standard in how media covered this slur compared to Don Imus's “nappy-headed ho's” comment some years ago. There was a media-created “firestorm” when Imus made that comment, but no media buzz over Schultz's smear, Bozell agreed. “Where are we right now with this onslaught of personal attacks on conservatives? Where is that firestorm now,” the Media Research Center founder asked.
Continue reading …Protests erupt after Mongolian herder run over by coal truck as he tried to stop mining convoy driving across prairie land Outside the closed gates of the Xilingol Mongolian high school, Chinese police watched warily as hundreds of students performed calisthenic exercises in a yard they had left the previous day to march through the streets. A short drive along the city’s boulevards, another police unit was monitoring a middle school that was suddenly a source of concern. On
Continue reading …Protests erupt after Mongolian herder run over by coal truck as he tried to stop mining convoy driving across prairie land Outside the closed gates of the Xilingol Mongolian high school, Chinese police watched warily as hundreds of students performed calisthenic exercises in a yard they had left the previous day to march through the streets. A short drive along the city’s boulevards, another police unit was monitoring a middle school that was suddenly a source of concern. On
Continue reading …Alois Mabhunu may face a year in prison for insulting the president after being caught short at trade fair When the call of nature comes, it cannot always be denied. Few have answered it in such an unfortunate fashion as Alois Mabhunu. While on duty at a trade fair the Zimbabwean police sergeant simply could not hold on and allegedly dashed to the nearest toilet – disastrously, as it transpired, a toilet specially reserved for President Robert Mugabe. Mabhunu’s relief was thus shortlived. He was arrested and has languished in jail for two weeks on suspicion of invading the presidential privy. The incident happened at the annual Zimbabwe international trade fair (ZITF) in the western city of Bulawayo, according to local radio station VOP . Under the headline “Never Use Toilet Reserved For President!” VOP’s website reported that Mabhunu was on duty at the ZITF grounds during its official opening by Mugabe and Jean-Louis Ekra, the president of Afreximbank. “Mabhunu, due to the call of nature, rushed to the toilets reserved for Mugabe and his guest Ekra, but was stopped by other officers guarding the toilets,” VOP said. “Under intense pressure from the call of nature, the officer forced his way in and managed to relieve himself. He was arrested the following day on 7 May after a report was made to Mugabe’s security men and to senior police officers in the city.” Mabhunu, a murder detective, is in police detention at barracks on the outskirts of Bulawayo. The legality of the case against him was challenged by Beatrice Mtetwa, one of Zimbabwe’s leading human rights lawyers. “There has to be a law saying the toilet is the president’s, but this was a public one,” she said. “They will have had to issue a proclamation in the government gazette specifying it. I bet they didn’t do that.” Mugabe’s personal space – and reputation as father of the independent nation – are fiercely protected. Several motorists are said to have been assaulted by his security personnel for not giving way to the presidential motorcade. Douglas Mwonzora, a leading member of the Movement for Democratic Change, was standing in court in March waiting for a magistrate to arrive when he looked at a portrait of Mugabe and said: “How are you, father? How is your health?” There was mirth in the courtroom but police subsequently charged Mwonzora with insulting the president, an offence punishable by up to a year in prison. Another man will go on trial next month charged with posting an offensive message on Facebook. Vikas Mavhudzi allegedly wrote on prime minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s “wall”: “What happened in Egypt is sending shockwaves to all dictators around the world. No weapon but unity of purpose. Worth emulating, hey.” Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Islamabad must take decisive steps against terrorism, says secretary of state after meeting President Asif Ali Zardari The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, has said that relations between the US and Pakistan have reached a turning point after the killing of Osama bin Laden and that Pakistan must make “decisive steps” to fight terrorism. Clinton made the remarks on Friday after meeting Pakistan’s civilian and military leaders on a brief trip to Islamabad to repair relations, which have been badly frayed by the US raid on 2 May that killed the al-Qaida leader. The Pakistanis were angry that they had not been told of the raid in advance, while the location of Bin Laden’s hideout, in an army town not far from the capital, raised US suspicions that members of the security services must have known his whereabouts. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, who was also in Pakistan, was blunt. “I think we all realise the challenges under which this relationship now labours,” he told reporters. “We had very candid discussions, the kind of discussion two friends should be able to have at times like this.” Clinton and Mullen are the highest-ranking US representatives to confer with Pakistan’s leaders since the raid, which splintered already fragile support in both countries for the agenda of co-operation that officials of both countries say they want. Part of the meeting between Clinton and President Asif Ali Zardari briefly witnessed by reporters was stiff and awkward, with no smiles among the US delegation. Clinton said relations “had reached a turning point” but she thought Pakistan knew the stakes involved. She said it was “up to the government of Pakistan to take decisive steps in the days ahead” against militants, but did not give any details. Clinton also pointed to the reality facing the United States as it contemplates how to deal with Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nexus for extremism and terrorism in a strategically vital region. The US relies on Pakistan for transit and supply routes for the war in Afghanistan and will need its help if Afghanistan is to broker a peace deal with Taliban militants that can end the war. The country is believed to have influence over several Afghan insurgent commanders. Clinton acknowledged this, saying that “for reconciliation to succeed Pakistan must be part of this process”. The US visit comes a day after a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber detonated a pickup truck loaded with explosives near several government offices in north-west Pakistan, killing at least 32 people. Thursday’s blast was the latest in a series of attacks to hit the country since the Bin Laden raid. Pakistan United States Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Global terrorism guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Islamabad must take decisive steps against terrorism, says secretary of state after meeting President Asif Ali Zardari The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, has said that relations between the US and Pakistan have reached a turning point after the killing of Osama bin Laden and that Pakistan must make “decisive steps” to fight terrorism. Clinton made the remarks on Friday after meeting Pakistan’s civilian and military leaders on a brief trip to Islamabad to repair relations, which have been badly frayed by the US raid on 2 May that killed the al-Qaida leader. The Pakistanis were angry that they had not been told of the raid in advance, while the location of Bin Laden’s hideout, in an army town not far from the capital, raised US suspicions that members of the security services must have known his whereabouts. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, who was also in Pakistan, was blunt. “I think we all realise the challenges under which this relationship now labours,” he told reporters. “We had very candid discussions, the kind of discussion two friends should be able to have at times like this.” Clinton and Mullen are the highest-ranking US representatives to confer with Pakistan’s leaders since the raid, which splintered already fragile support in both countries for the agenda of co-operation that officials of both countries say they want. Part of the meeting between Clinton and President Asif Ali Zardari briefly witnessed by reporters was stiff and awkward, with no smiles among the US delegation. Clinton said relations “had reached a turning point” but she thought Pakistan knew the stakes involved. She said it was “up to the government of Pakistan to take decisive steps in the days ahead” against militants, but did not give any details. Clinton also pointed to the reality facing the United States as it contemplates how to deal with Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nexus for extremism and terrorism in a strategically vital region. The US relies on Pakistan for transit and supply routes for the war in Afghanistan and will need its help if Afghanistan is to broker a peace deal with Taliban militants that can end the war. The country is believed to have influence over several Afghan insurgent commanders. Clinton acknowledged this, saying that “for reconciliation to succeed Pakistan must be part of this process”. The US visit comes a day after a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber detonated a pickup truck loaded with explosives near several government offices in north-west Pakistan, killing at least 32 people. Thursday’s blast was the latest in a series of attacks to hit the country since the Bin Laden raid. Pakistan United States Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Global terrorism guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Woman alleged to have had affair with Sir Fred Goodwin fails to persuade high court Daily Mail ‘deliberately flouted’ injunction Lawyers acting for the woman alleged to have had an affair with the former bank boss Sir Fred Goodwin have failed in an attempt to launch contempt of court proceedings against the Daily Mail. The high court declined on Friday to refer the Associated Newspapers title to the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, over an article it published last week. Hugh Tomlinson QC, acting on behalf of the woman involved, accused the Daily Mail of “deliberately flouting” Goodwin’s privacy injunction with a profile of the woman, which they claimed allowed people to identify her easily and therefore breach the court order. The online version of the article was taken down. The woman, an ex-colleague of the former Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive, could now decide to refer the Daily Mail to the attorney general. Handing down judgment at the high court in London, Mr Justice Tugendhat said: “The reason that I decline to make the reference is that, in my judgment, it would not assist the attorney general. “The lady is free to refer the matter to the attorney general herself, and the attorney general is free to act of his own motion. “This case has received extensive coverage in many newspapers and other news media and has been the subject of public judgements.” The article was published last Friday, hours after Mr Justice Tugendhat partially lifted Goodwin’s injunction so that he could be named. However, it banned reporting of details of the alleged relationship and the name of the woman, said to be a former “senior colleague” of Goodwin. Lawyers for the Daily Mail said there had been no “deliberate intention” to flout or frustrate the court order and argued that a report in the newspaper had not breached it. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook Media law Sir Fred Goodwin Banking Royal Bank of Scotland Superinjunctions Privacy & the media Privacy Daily Mail Newspapers National newspapers Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …French president lets Benghazi plan slip at summit where leading countries will say Libyan ruler must step down David Cameron and the French president, Nicholas Sarkozy, are planning a joint visit to Benghazi, the Libyan rebel stronghold, Sarkozy has disclosed. He was speaking at press conference at the end of the G8 summit of rich western nations where all countries agreed that Muammar Gaddafi had lost legitimacy and must step down. The Russians agreed to back this decision but David Cameron rejected suggestions the Russians had offered to mediate towards Gaddafi’s exit. Cameron said only one message needed to get to Gaddafi: that it was time to go. British sources would not confirm details of the planned trip to Benghazi and Cameron parried the question by saying: “Nicolas Sarkozy is full of good ideas.” Reflecting a hardening of the Russian line on Libya, the draft communique from the group of leading industrial nations – due to be issued shortly – goes further than merely stating there needs to be a negotiated settlement. The statement from national leaders meeting in Deauville, France, will use unusually simple language to state: “Gaddafi and the Libyan government have failed to fulfil their responsibility to protect the Libyan population and have lost all legitimacy. He has no future in a free, democratic Libya. He must go.” It is due to add: “We welcome the work of the international criminal court in investigating crimes in Libya and note the chief prosecutor’s request on 16 May for three arrest warrants .” If such language remains in the final communique, it will be seen as a victory for the French president Nicolas Sarkozy and for David Cameron following their decision to provide ground attack helicopters for use by Nato. The tough stance comes amid a hardening of the Russian position amid signs that the country’s leaders have lost patience with Gaddafi and are willing to act as mediators to speed his exit from power. The Russian deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, said: “Colonel Gaddafi has deprived himself of legitimacy with his actions, we should help him leave.” The communique also says: “We are committed to supporting a political transition that reflects the will of the Libyan people. “We recall our strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Libya.” On other issues, the G8 leaders claim “the world economy is recovering” even if more needs to be done to reduce global imbalances and deficits. The communique also discusses the role of the internet, nuclear safety after the Fukushima disaster and concedes that the G8 nations have collectively failed to meet their pledges on aid to Africa. Regarding the internet, the communique treads a fine line between advocating governmental regulation and allowing so-called “wild west” free rein. It states: “The effective protection of personal data and individual privacy on the internet is essential to earn users’ trust. “It is a matter for all stakeholders: the users who need to be better aware of their responsibility when placing personal data on the internet, the service providers who store and process this data, and governments and regulators who must ensure the effectiveness of this protection.” It adds: “We encourage the development of common approaches taking into account national legal frameworks, based on fundamental rights and that protect personal data, whilst allowing the legal transfer of data. “We will also work towards developing an environment in which children can safely use the internet by improving children’s internet literacy including risk awareness, and encouraging adequate parental controls consistent with the freedom of expression.” In response to the demands of internet companies to be left alone, the communique adds: “Flexibility and transparency have to be maintained in order to adapt to the fast pace of technological and business developments and uses. Governments have a key role to play in this model.” On the state of the world economy, the communique admits there are strong headwinds that could slow growth. “The global recovery is gaining strength and is becoming more self-sustained. However, downside risks remain and internal and external imbalances are still a concern. “The sharp increase in commodity prices and their excessive volatility pose a significant headwind to the recovery.” Both Europe and the US are asked to do more to address structural problems. The communique says: “The United States will put in place a clear and credible medium-term fiscal consolidation framework, consistent with considerations of job creation and economic growth. “In Japan, while providing resources for the reconstruction after the disaster, the authorities will also address the issue of sustainability of public finances. The communique offers little progress on climate change but reasserts the now firm G8 position “to limit effectively the increase in global temperatures below 2 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels, consistent with science.” The bulk of detailed work on climate change now takes place in the context of the G20, allowing China, Brazil and India, the new carbon economies, to set out their demands. In a step change for the G8 there is a frank admission of a collective failure to reach the aid targets set six years ago at Gleneagles. It states: “In 2005, the OECD estimated that official development assistance (ODA) from the G8 and other donors to developing countries would increase by around $50bn (£30bn) by 2010 compared to 2004. “There is a gap of $19bn in constant dollars or $1.27bn in current dollars, relative to OECD estimates for 2010.” The communique does claim that, despite this shortfall: “G8 aid has been increasing from $82.55bn to $89.25bn in current dollars between 2009 and 2010. “This represents 70% of global overseas development assistance, which reached $128.73bn in 2010, representing a 7.27% increase in current dollars compared to 2009.” On transparency, an issue on which charities and aid groups have been pressing the G8 for years, there is a commitment to do more to spell out in detail how well the G8 is doing in meeting its pledges. It states: “We will make further efforts on publishing information on allocations, expenditure and results. Information will be provided in accessible formats that deliver on the needs of partner countries and citizens.” G8 Muammar Gaddafi Libya International criminal court Economic policy Economics David Cameron Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Downing Street refurbishments revealed in government records, including £30,000 for a new kitchen David Cameron has spent more than £680,000 of public money renovating Downing Street in the year that his government inflicted the biggest ever spending cuts across the public sector. Records of all government spending reveal nine bills for the refurbishment of Downing Street including £30,000 for the work he and his wife Samantha carried out on the No 11 flat last summer. The centerpiece of their revamp was the new kitchen, which was revealed this week in official photographs of the Obama state visit. Downing Street has confirmed for the first time that the full £30,000 grant for upkeep of the living accommodation, which is available to prime minister annually, was used for the refit of 11 Downing Street, after the Guardian discovered the payment published in the government’s official spending records. A spokeswomen said that the money was spent on rewiring, plumbing and decorating the flat but insisted that the Camerons paid for the extras. “No public money was spent on furniture, fittings or accessories,” she said in a statement. The other £653,192.34 was spent on external and internal renovation work to the offices and reception rooms in Downing Street, including cabling, plumbing and energy efficiency improvements. But No 10 declined to specify any further what the money was spent on and have previously refused Freedom of Information requests asking what changes have been made to the Grade I listed building since the election and the costs. Tom Watson, the Labour MP for West Bromwich East, who has been campaigning for greater openness about the financing of Downing Street, described the £30,000 grant as a “hidden bonus for the PM” to supplement a flat he lives in rent-free. He said: “£30,000 is more than a nurse’s salary. People need to know what’s gone in there and how much it’s cost. It’s not their building, it’s the nation’s building. “The PM heralded the age of transparency and said we’re in a for a period of austerity. Low and behold the taxpayers subsidised a £30,000 kitchen and he’s refusing to give all the details. He’s not living up to his pledges. “He has to come clean about his own taxpayer’s subsidy. He’s supposed to be setting an example to rest of public sector.” The cabinet office’s database of all items of spending above £25,000 (pdf) , updated this week to the end of March, reveals that since the election the exchequer has funded a £683,102.34 refurbishment of Downing Street in total. There could be even more payments below that threshold. The nine separate payments were made to Ecovert FM Ltd, the company that manages all cabinet office buildings, since November. The Camerons occupy the four-bedroom flat above 11 Downing Street, as the Blair’s did before them, because it is bigger than the one above No 10. The new kitchen is in addition to a second new catering kitchen in the property and a planning permission application for more structural work was lodged with Westminster council last year to move a doorway and build a wall. The work is particularly costly because of the historic nature of the building. English Heritage are involved in decisions about nearly all modifications. The contracts for the renovations were only accessible because the coalition has begun to routinely publish details of all spending over a £25,000 threshold. But Watson said that the pledges of transparency were undermined by the government’s refusal to give any detail on the payments. Downing Street has separately refused an FOI request from Watson for more full details of the refurbishment costs. The Information Commissioner’s Office, which is responsible for enforcing the Freedom of Information Act, has since issued a demand for records held by the Cabinet Office about the nature and the cost of the work. A spokesman for the ICO said because the situation was ongoing, it would not comment. David Cameron Conservatives Liberal-Conservative coalition Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …