Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 1022)
Ratko Mladic ruled fit for extradition to face Bosnia war crimes tribunal

Defence insists Bosnian Serb general is ill but court approves transfer to The Hague and officials say he is in robust form Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb general charged with orchestrating the murder of tens of thousands of Balkan Muslims, has been ruled fit for extradition to face international justice after the capture that ended his 16 years as a fugitive. Brought before a special Belgrade court a day after being arrested in a dawn raid on a country cottage north-east of the Serbian capital, Mladic dismissed the 15 counts of genocide and war crimes against him, while his lawyer and family insisted he was too ill to be extradited for trial at the UN war crimes tribunal in the Hague. They asked for him to be hospitalised in Belgrade and treated by a team of Russian doctors. Following a medical examination, however, the Belgrade judge ruled that the 69-year-old was fit to be transferred to the Yugoslav tribunal in The Hague. The judge gave Mladic three days to appeal. Bruno Vekaric, a Serbian war crimes prosecutor, said the extradition could be completed within a week. A panel of judges is expected to hear the appeal on Monday before the Serbian justice minister decides whether to put Mladic on a flight to the Netherlands. Doctors, family, lawyers and a Serbian government minister went on Friday to the detention unit where Mladic. They talked to the genocide suspect, who is said to have been in robust form when questioned on Thursday. Brusquely rejecting the charges against him, he turned on Vekaric, made rude remarks about his beard and refused to sign a statement. Mladic was put on suicide watch and had medicines and his spectacles taken away. “Are you frightened I’m going to kill myself? Mladic won’t do Mladic,” he told his guards, according to the Belgrade newspaper Blic quoting court sources. His son, Darko Mladic, said after visiting the suspect twice on Friday: “His stand is that he’s not guilty of what he’s being accused of. “He has received a medical examination and is under medical observation, but we think that’s not enough because of his condition. From what we saw his state of health is worrying. We are demanding that he be transferred to hospital and we want a team of doctors from Russia.” His son added that the doctors had evidence of two strokes. The court spokesman, Maja Kovacevic, agreed Mladic was ill but said he was capable of understanding the proceedings and was fit to go to The Hague, where medical treatment would be available. As details began to emerge of the operation to seize Mladic, questions were being asked about why the Serbian authorities, under intense international pressure, had taken so long to locate him. Ivica Dacic, the Serbian interior minister, said Mladic had been living for years in the small Vojvodina village of Lazarevo, north-east of Belgrade. Dacic said that when a special police unit seized Mladic early on Thursday and asked him to identify himself, he replied: “Congratulations, you’ve found who you are looking for.” On Friday in the Serbian half of Bosnia, protests at the arrest began to multiply. Posters of Mladic with the slogan “Serbs arise” appeared across Banja Luka, the Bosnian Serb capital, and demonstrations were announced in Pale and Han Pijesak, the wartime political and military headquarters of Mladic and Radovan Karadzic, also being tried on genocide charges. The Mladic arrest is seen as a coup for Serbia’s President Boris Tadic, who pressed the European Union to reward him by naming a date for starting talks on Serbia’s membership. But in what is seen as a missed opportunity, Tadic is boycotting a summit of east European leaders with Barack Obama because the president of Kosovo, which Belgrade refuses to recognise as independent, will be there. Ratko Mladic Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina War crimes Europe United Nations Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
G8 summit: Gaddafi isolated as Russia joins demand for Libyan leader to go

Nations united over Libya as Cameron says pressure on Libyan regime beginning to tell – but rift remains over Syria Colonel Gaddafi has beenleft diplomatically deserted after Russia, his sole international interlocutor joined the rest of the G8 rich nations in declaring the Libyan leader had lost all legitimacy and had to go. But continuing differences between Russia and the west prevented agreement on how to pressurise the Syrian regime to end its oppression; a planned reference to take the issue to the UN security council was removed from the G8 communique. On Libya, David Cameron claimed there would be no attempt to reach a compromise deal saying the only message to the Libyan leader was that he had to give up power. Cameron, who held a council of war with Barack Obama and Nicholas Sarkozy on Thursday night, claimed the war against Gaddafi was entering a second phase and the pressure on the regime was beginning to tell. There had been suggestions the Russians would act as some kind of mediator in trying to secure a peace deal with Gaddafi, but Cameron said the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, had not made this suggestion in the discussions he had had with them. Cameron said: “The most important thing is to send the same message down the pipe when one of these offers appears and the message is that Gaddafi has to go. All sorts of things can happen after that. All offers of mediation should be met with that pretty clear response.” He said the Tripoli regime was beginning to feel the heat, revealing: “There is a whole string of contacts taking place, of phone calls and faxes coming out saying ‘how do we get out of this, what do we about this?’ to which I say there is one clear response: Gaddafi has to go.” Sarkozy revealed he had been discussing a joint visit with Cameron to the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, but Cameron’s aides played down the prospect of an imminent trip. Sarkozy also highlighted the terms of the communique saying: “There is unanimous support for this objective and the terms used against Gaddafi are particularly clear and hard and accepted by all the G8 countries including Russia.” In unusually simple language for a G8 communique, the leaders of the industrialised west said: “Gaddafi and the Libyan government have failed to fulfil their responsibility to protect the Libyan population and have lost all legitimacy. He has no future in a free, democratic Libya. He must go. “We welcome the work of the international criminal court in investigating crimes in Libya and note the chief prosecutor’s request on 16 May for three arrest warrants.” The Russians said they would send a delegation to Benghazi, but would not accept Gaddafi into exile. The communique was less clear, Cameron conceded, on Syria, admitting that the Arab world was divided as to whether President Assad might yet take the fork in the road towards reconciliation. Sarkozy was more blunt: “The situation is perfectly unacceptable and the attitude of the powers in the country is shocking. We have done everything we can to bring Syria into the international community. We have tried to help, to advise, to understand … sadly the leaders are going firmly backwards and we have withdrawn our confidence and criticised what has to be criticised.” The shift in the communique language to a vaguer threat of “further measures” appeared to be driven by Russia, which has a security council veto and has been upset by the way in which the west has interpreted its right to bomb Gaddafi following an earlier UN resolution giving Nato all necessary powers to protect civilians. “There are no grounds to consider this issue [Syria] in the UN security council,” Russia’s deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, told reporters. He said a draft resolution circulated to the 15-nation council on Wednesday by Britain, France, Germany and Portugal was “untimely and damaging”, adding: “We will not even read the text.” The draft resolution could also face a Chinese veto. The language on Libya by contrast at the G8 will be seen as a victory for Sarkozy, suggesting he managed to persuade a reluctant Russian delegation to bury their doubts about the scale of the military offensive, including the decision by the French and British to provide ground attack helicopters for use by Nato. In other parts of the communique the language on Libya is less robust, stating: “We are committed to supporting a political transition that reflects the will of the Libyan people. We recall our strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Libya.” Elsewhere in the communique, the leaders of the biggest industrialised countries also claim “the world economy is recovering”, even if more needs to be done to reduce global imbalances and deficits. G8 Muammar Gaddafi Libya Syria France Middle East Dmitry Medvedev Africa Foreign policy David Cameron Nato Europe Patrick Wintour Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Freedom Riders hit the road again, 50 years after US civil rights milestone

Civil rights activists who helped to end segregation at bus and train stations reunite in Jackson, Mississippi It was just like the old days, when Mississippi was burning. Freedom Riders were back on Greyhound buses – and police cars with blue lights flashing and sirens blaring were waiting for them. This time, 50 years on, there was nothing to be scared of. Mississippi was welcoming the civil rights activists, and the police were providing an honour guard to ease their way. Luvaghn Brown, 66, from Mississippi but now living in New York, was acutely aware of the change. “It is a huge difference. When we were escorted by the police before it was only to take us from one prison to another.” Brown was jailed in 1961, aged 16, for eating in a whites-only cafeteria and again a year later for picketing a fairground, which in those days had white-only and black-only days. He returned this week for the 50th reunion of the riders. Jackson, the state capital, marked their challenge to segregation with a week of events. Another rider, Max Pavlesic noticed the change as soon as he arrived at Jackson’s airport, and not just because it has been renamed Jackson-Evers after the slain civil rights leader Medgar Evers. “There are only two kinds of bathrooms at the airport now, men and women,” Pavlesic said. “The last time I was here there were eight: white men, coloured men, white women, coloured women, white men employees, white women employees, coloured men employees and coloured women employees. That is how outrageous the system was.” Most of the 427 riders were students in their teens or early 20s, arriving from across America on the trains and buses, black and white together going into segregated waiting rooms and cafeterias. They were attacked in Alabama and jailed in Mississippi, in Parchman, the most notorious prison in the south, William Faulkner’s “Destination Doom”. They were allowed back inside Parchman this week, travelling deep into the delta in a convoy of six Greyhounds, to visit their old cells. There was a welcome placard outside the gates. The Clarion-Ledger – which the day after Martin Luther King’s 1963 “I have a dream” speech used the headline Washington is Clean Again with Negro Trash Removed – led with Riders Return as Heroes. Governor Haley Barbour even invited them to breakfast at his mansion. A potential candidate for the Republican nomination in the 2012 presidential race, Barbour dropped out after a row over a comment sympathetic to the White Citizens Council, a civil rights era supremacist group. Some riders refused to return in protest. But Barbour surprised the 60 to 70 who did make the journey by issuing “an apology for your mistreatment in 1961″ and adding: “We appreciate this chance for atonement and reconciliation.” The response of the riders was mixed, with some suspicious about Barbour’s sincerity. But Hank Thomas, 70, who was almost killed when his bus was firebombed in Alabama, said: “For the govenor to apologise is a big step towards reconciliation.” Some of the riders, mainly in their 60s and 70s now, went on to become leaders of the civil rights movement. Others became teachers, lawyers, preachers and social workers. Many remain politically active, maintaining a cheerful optimism that grassroots action can achieve change and still bound by their time in Parchman. Joan Mulholland, a retired teacher from Virginia, saw no tears when they went back to their old cells, just friends swapping stories and laughing. They had been held in Unit 17, maximum security, used for death row prisoners, even though they had been charged only with breach of the peace. The aim was to humiliate and psychologically break them. “We go to the airport now and get virtual searches. I got the real thing, [into] body cavities, which was nasty,” said Mulholland, 19 at the time. The riders angered the guards by constantly singing The Buses Are A-Coming and other freedom songs. They had their clothes taken away, their mattresses and, finally, their toothbrushes. But the songs went on. They were allowed out once a week, just long enough for a shower. They were held for, on average, about 40 days. Claire O’Connor, 70, a community organiser from Minnesota, said it was not all bad, especially in jail in Jackson before being taken to Parchman. “All the white women were in one cell and all the black women in another. We had a lot of fun. We studied ballet. One of the black women was a ballet teacher and shouted out instructions,” she said. She continued campaigning after Parchman, returning to Mississippi to volunteer in the African-American voter registration campaign in 1964, Freedom Summer, portrayed in Mississippi Burning. How much of a difference did they make? One of the posters round Jackson says: “No Black. No White. Just Blues.” None of the riders is naive enough to believe Mississippi is close to that. They secured an early victory for the civil rights movement, helping end segregation at bus and train stations, but they are well aware that racism is still alive in the state, as elsewhere in the US. In parts of Mississippi, the school system is effectively segregated, with up to 99% black pupils in some schools. Bob Filner, 68, who was jailed at Parchman and is now a Democratic congressman from California, is uneasy about the reunion posters round Jackson, “as if we have come as conquering heroes”. He reels off depressing statistics about the ratio of African-Americans and Latinos in jail and the tiny proportion of African-Americans or Latinos who will make it to university. “We have a long way to go,” he says. The motives behind the reunion are mixed. It is partly a chance for Mississippi to say thanks and partly a move towards reconciliation. It is also the start of an effort to attract tourists to the poorest state in the US with the creation of a Mississippi Freedom Trail, 30 plaques commemorating landmarks in the civil rights struggle. The riders attended the unveiling of one of the first, outside the renovated Greyhound station in Jackson where some of them arrived 50 years ago. The authorities are far from confident the plaques will not be defaced. A memorial plaque put up in the delta at the place where the body was found of Emmett Till, the 14-year-old murdered in 1955 for allegedly whistling at a white woman, has been vandalised several times. Many young whites and blacks in Mississippi had never heard of the riders, mainly because, unlike other parts of America, the civil rights era is not covered in school. The state legislature voted this year to make it a mandatory part of the curriculum. At a dinner in Jackson this week, tribute after tribute was paid to the riders, with African-American judges and members of the state legislature saying they would not have made it to office without their efforts. Ben Jealous, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, speaking at the dinner, thanked the riders for having had “the foolishness to believe they could make a difference”. Mississippi United States Race issues Civil liberties – international Human rights Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Injunctions row: Meet the man who helps celebrities remain anonymous

High-profile barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC says privacy law is good, if properly defined and enforced Hugh Tomlinson QC has become renowned for making clients anonymous. It is his persuasive charm that regularly ensures celebrities’ alleged infidelities or other indiscretions are not exposed in the tabloids. He is the leading securer of privacy injunctions. His prominent – although sometimes invisible – customers have included Sir Fred Goodwin, former head of RBS and Chris Hutcheson, father-in-law of the chef Gordon Ramsay, as well as footballers and television personalities whose true identities are concealed behind random series of letters: CTB, DFT, POI, AJH, and MJN. That celebrities have been unmasked in parliament, on Twitter, or on the web – becoming more celebrated than intended – has not dented Tomlinson’s belief in strict judicial enforcement of privacy rights. “Rules have been laid down,” he says. “The fact the law is difficult to enforce doesn’t mean you don’t try to enforce it.” Yet no one would suggest such a jovial man – who clearly relishes the interplay of argument and runs the influential Inforrm legal blog about media law – of being a prude or adopting a secretive lifestyle. Tomlinson himself appears bemused that he has gained the status of preserver of reputations for those wealthy and desperate enough to need a privacy order. But the 57-year-old is in no doubt that the 1998 Human Rights Act provides clear authority for protecting those who wish to prevent details of their extra-marital sex lives being paraded through the media. “The current legal position has got the balance essentially right,” he says. “If things are private they shouldn’t become public unless there’s public interest in doing so. The main point of contention is that the press say that if someone is having an adulterous affair, that’s something that should be exposed. The judges don’t agree. “They draw the line that [publication is only allowed] where there’s misconduct the law recognises, for example, criminal and regulatory misconduct or hypocritical misleading of the public.” That such a broad definition has been adopted by British judges has shocked the media, particularly those that rely on “kiss and tell” stories. “If anyone had misled the public as to whether they had a drug habit or medical condition, they would never obtain a privacy injunction,” he adds. “In the end someone has to decide on the public interest. It can’t be editors who have an obvious axe to grind. It can’t be parliamentarians because they don’t have the evidence on the particular facts of [each] case. Judges form the only available institution to make the decisions.” Tomlinson studied philosophy, not law, at university, pursuing research, after Oxford, at Sussex and Paris. He has translated seven books of the post-modernist French thinker Gilles Deleuze , one of whose more enigmatic sayings states: “A concept is a brick. It can be used to build a courthouse of reason. Or it can be thrown through the window.” Having joined the bar in 1983, Tomlinson became a QC in 2002. He has co-authored textbooks on suing the police and the law of human rights, which at 2,000 pages, as he points out, is 50% longer than the Bible. “I began as a barrister who did everything; a bit of crime, commercial and family law. Then I began working with George Carmen, the head of my chambers, on a few big libel cases, such as Virgin v British Airways. “Having written a book on human rights and knowing media law meant that I was instructed in cases related to privacy.” Other clients have included the footballer Rio Ferdinand and the Prince of Wales during his legal battle with the Mail on Sunday over his travel diaries. Tomlinson is a member – alongside Cherie Booth, Professor Philippe Sands and the former DPP Lord Macdonald – of the London-based Matrix chambers. The courts’ recent decision to stage more privacy cases, where possible, in public has reinforced Tomlinson’s profile. He has appeared four times in the court of appeal on privacy cases in the past six months. He has regularly been instructed by Schillings, the solicitors which have also pioneered privacy injunctions. He prefers less puzzling titles for cases than the random, alphabetic sequences that look like they have been devised by an amateur cryptologist. “The royal courts of justice’s computer needs at least three letters,” he says. “They are made up on the spur of the moment. I have tried to introduce real names. We called one last year ‘The author of a Blog v The Times’.” Privacy injunctions can cost a client between £5,000 and £50,000. Tomlinson is complimentary about the recent report by the Master of the Rolls but disagrees with one of its main recommendations: inviting the media into injunction application hearings. It would make the procedure more difficult and increase costs, he believes. “The press can already apply to discharge an order.” He does not always represent the applicant. Last year, he appeared for a soul singer, Adakini Ntuli, challenging a superinjunction which prevented her revealing she had had an affair with the Take That member Howard Donald. “It was the first case where a superinjunction was challenged in the court of appeal,” he recounts. Does he believe Britain is heading towards a French-style, more protective privacy law? “There’s a very slow but obvious convergence between European legal systems. Aspects of the approach in France are coming into English law. We are becoming more French.” The recent setbacks to privacy injunctions do not discourage him. “What’s important to me is the protection of my clients. A barrister’s job is to go to court and argue the best possible case on behalf of his or her client. “After this outburst of public hysteria over gagging orders, people will get to the bottom of it and realise there’s not much in it. That may be helpful to people who want to protect their privacy.” A privacy law was first proposed in parliament in 1961. He would like to see the issue debated in the Commons: “It’s perfectly proper and sensible for parliament to give general guidance. “It’s important to have a public consensus about privacy law – to have wider agreement about where the boundaries should be so that every one knows where they stand.” Injunctions Superinjunctions Privacy & the media Celebrity Media law Newspapers Owen Bowcott guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
The Jobs Gap: The Deficit That Matters Most

enlarge Credit: Washington Post While all eyes remain fixed on the Republican debt ceiling hostage drama in Washington, the deficit that really matters has all but disappeared from the American political debate. Even as Vice President Biden confidently predicted his bipartisan group of budget negotiators would slash $1 trillion in spending , forecasters are once again downgrading their estimates for second quarter economic growth . All of which means that with 9% unemployment and record-low labor force participation, the jobs deficit should be job number one for both political parties . With first-time jobless claims edging back up and first quarter growth lowered to 1.8% , Macroeconomic Advisors dropping their Q2 GDP growth forecast from 3.2% to 2.8%. That prompted Paul Krugman was quick to join Brad Delong in sounding the alarm. It’s “time to panic,” Delong warned, adding that real second quarter GDP growth “looks slow enough to put no upward pressure at all on the employment-to-population ratio.” Krugman, who ominously cautioned last year about “Third Depression” in the form of prolonged economic weakness, lamented that: As Brad says, these estimates now suggest that we have now gone through a year and a half of “recovery” that has failed to make any progress toward closing the gap between what the economy should be producing and what it’s actually producing. That output gap, the Washington Post showed using a helpful interactive graphic last fall, explains “why it doesn’t feel like a recovery.” While U.S. GDP has now surpassed its pre-Bush recession level , the $900 billion divide between the amount the United States can produce and what it is actually producing “explains why we feel so miserable more than a year into what is technically classified as an economic recovery.” Worse still, as the Post charted at the time, at current rates of population and productivity growth, the economy would have to expand at an average of 3% a year to reduce unemployment to 5% by 2020 . Right now, that’s just not happening. While the recession officially ended in 2009, the current recovery is proceeding at a much more sluggish rate than usual. The result, as the thoroughly depressing chart which follows from the St. Louis Fed shows, is persistent joblessness hovering around 9%. Just as frightening, employment as percentage of U.S. population has nose-dived. (As the New York Times noted earlier this month, “men currently have their lowest labor force participation rate since the Labor Department began keeping track since 1948.” For months, House Speaker John Boehner has insisted that “getting Americans back to work has been and will continue to be the number-one priority for our new majority.” Of course, that promise wasn’t just belied by Boehner’s choices instead to fast-track draconian new anti-abortion legislation or his April declaration that repealing the Obama health care law was “our No. 1 priority.” As the data show, the GOP has successfully transformed Americans’ focus onto another issue altogether: the budget deficit. “Reagan,” Vice President Dick Cheney famously declared in 2002, “proved deficits don’t matter.” Unless, that is, a Democrat is in the White House . After all, while Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and George W. Bush doubled it again , each Republican was rewarded with a second term in office. But as the Gallup polling data show, concern over the federal deficit hasn’t been this high since Democratic budget balancer Bill Clinton was in office. All of which suggest the Republicans’ born-again disdain for deficits ranks among the greatest – and most successful – political double-standards in recent memory. The triumph of the GOP messaging machine is reflected in an April Washington Post/Pew Research poll. In just the four months since the Republican majority took control of the House, the percentage of Americans believing the budget deficit is a major problem which must be addressed now catapulted from 70% to 81%. But even more revealing is an April Gallup survey which showed the deficit (17%) rivaling the unemployment (19%) and the overall state of the economy (26%). And as it turns out, those cyclical swings in budget angst reflect the complete victory of the conservative deficit narrative. The Republicans’ misdirection on debt and deficits is reflecting in myriad other ways as well. Despite having voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush (as well as for the Bush tax cuts the unfunded wars in Iraq and Afghanistan responsible for most of the nation’s debt over the next decade), GOP leaders have bamboozled Americans by a 48% to 35% margin that raising the debt limit would be worse than the cataclysm of a U.S. default . And as the National Journal revealed last week, the shift from jobs to deficits in American political discourse is reflected in media coverage as well: Major U.S. newspapers have increasingly shifted their attention away from coverage of unemployment in recent months while greatly intensifying their focus on the deficit, a National Journal analysis shows. The analysis — based on a measure of how often the words “unemployment” and “deficit” appear in major publications — portrays a dramatically shifting landscape of coverage over the past two years, as the debate over how to fix the federal deficit has risen to prominence and the question of how to handle still-high unemployment has faded from the media’s consciousness… Mentions of unemployment have been dwindling since they spiked to 154 in the month ending August 15, 2010; over the month ending Sunday, there were 63. Deficit mentions, meanwhile, surged up to 261 in the month ending December 15, 2010, when the leaders of President Obama’s deficit commission released their final report. Mentions of the deficit remained higher after the commission’s work wrapped up and as House Republicans and then the White House unveiled dueling proposals. In the month ending Sunday, there were 201 mentions. Writing in the Washington Post last month, Eugene Robinson fretted over “the word most politicians ignore: Jobs.” What is it, he asked, “about the word ‘jobs’ that our nation’s leaders fail to understand?” Sadly, Republicans won’t do anything about jobs and have made sure that Democrats can’t. Despite GOP claims to the contrary, the Obama stimulus worked. (By last June, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the Obama stimulus program had saved or created up to 3.3 million jobs, lowered the unemployment rate by as much as 1.8% and boosted GDP by 4.5%. For his part, former John McCain adviser Mark Zandi in August concluded that the combined federal interventions beginning in the fall of 2008 prevented the Great Recession from becoming Depression 2.0. ) But as Paul Krugman predicted before and Ezra Klein explained after, the underfunding of and overly optimistic unemployment predictions for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act when it was being crafted ensured the perception of failure, thus guaranteeing there would not be a second. So much the simplest way to trim the budget deficit cited by the New York Times’ David Leonhardt : cultivate growth . In March, former Obama administration economic adviser Christina Romer called the lack of action on job creation “shameful.” ‘I frankly don’t understand why policy makers aren’t more worried about the suffering of real families. I think there are tools we have tools…that we can use, and I think it’s shameful that we’re not using them….If I have a complaint about policy these days, it’s that we’re not doing enough. That goes all the way up to the Federal Reserve, [which] could be taking more aggressive action. It goes to the Congress and the Administration – there are fiscal policy actions they could be taking.” Reacting to the latest GDP downgrades and the implication for the American jobs deficit, a panicked Brad Delong suggested what some of those actions might be. It is, he said, “time for pulling more spending from the future forward into the present, and pushing more taxes from the present back into the future.” Writing in the New Yorks Times, David Leonhardt asked, “The economy is wavering; does Washington notice?” Sadly, the answer appears to be no. Unfortunately for the millions of unemployed, Republicans have intimidated Democrats and conned the American people into believing the budget deficit is the only one that matters. (An earlier version of this piece appeared at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …