Labour leader Ed Miliband is not addressing voters’ ‘everyday struggles’, says former home secretary David Blunkett Ed Miliband has been warned by the former cabinet minister David Blunkett that his political message is not being heard by the voters, and that the Labour party would not win an election if it were held today. Blunkett said Miliband had done well over the phone-hacking scandal, but that this had not improved Labour’s relationship with the electorate “one iota”. Echoing remarks by other senior figures in the party, including the shadow foreign secretary, Douglas Alexander, he called for the leader to focus on explaining to the public what Labour did right in power while providing answers to the big questions, including how the country should deal with the economic crisis. Speaking to the Observer on the eve of the Labour party conference, Blunkett said Labour, which is 4% ahead in the polls, would fail to win a majority in an early election. “I think it would probably be a hung parliament, with Labour having slightly more seats that the Conservatives,” he said. “But we have got to get in a position where we are 10, 12, 15 percentage points ahead, because a combination of facing two parties in coalition and the boundary changes and the disillusionment that austerity bring, it doesn’t bring revolution.” Blunkett, who voted for Andy Burnham – now shadow education secretary – and then David Miliband in the leadership elections last September, has kept his counsel on Ed Miliband’s performance over the last year. But in an intervention likely to cause some discomfort for the Labour leader, Blunkett concurred with Alexander’s admission yesterday that the Tories had so far been more successful in “framing a public language that made more sense of the economic crisis”. And while claiming that Miliband had enjoyed a “good year” and shed the Red Ed image, he said the Labour leader’s task was all the more difficult because of his lack of an established image among the wider public. “I think if you haven’t got a profile and people don’t easily recognise you or what you stand for, you have got a long haul,” Blunkett said. He added that the party had not recovered from the four months when Labour was leaderless after Gordon Brown’s resignation, during which the coalition was able to blame the country’s economic situation on Labour’s policies. He said: “Over the last year I think we have recovered a lot of our confidence, Ed Miliband has had a good 12 months since he was elected, but we never recovered from that interregnum where we really didn’t have anyone in leadership positions defending Labour’s record. “I think the biggest challenge for Ed is not the decisions he has taken, which on the whole I have agreed entirely with and I think he has handled himself personally very well, but actually getting that hearing with the electorate, getting that foothold on the ladder. That is a very difficult challenge. “We can throw stones at paper giants and get angry about where power lives, but it is almost irrelevant to people out here in their own lives. This taking on the media giants is a necessary part of politics, and actually Ed Miliband did extremely well in relation to what happened with News International, because he pushed David Cameron into having to take action which he was reluctant to take. But good and important as it was, and necessary in terms of our values and where we stand, it hasn’t actually changed our opinion polls one iota. “The lesson I learned from that is, yes, we should take on sources of power and we should speak for those who don’t have a voice, that is what we are in business to do, but we should also recognise that unless what we are saying and doing has a direct relationship to people’s everyday struggle, they won’t reward us.” Blunkett said he supports Miliband’s position on the economy, but spoke of his concerns that the Labour leader is being advised on policy by Lord (Maurice) Glasman, an academic who has made a “Blue Labour” case for more conservative policies on certain social and international issues, such as immigration and crime. Blunkett said: “About 80% of it, I don’t have a problem with because it is old-fashioned communitarianism. About 20% is xenophobia and I don’t like it, and it tries to pretend we can resolve these big issues on a local scale and we can’t.” Blunkett, the MP for Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough, added that, while he believed that it was important for Labour to set out how it would promote more cohesive communities, much of what had been set out as Blue Labour was a distraction from more important issues, such as the economy. “It is a necessary, welcome comfort blanket which, whilst it is a part counterweight to people’s feeling of helplessness and hopelessness, it doesn’t deal with the central issue of how in 2015 onwards we deal with the big sources of power globally.” Miliband had to be seen “absolutely alongside” ordinary people, “physically and in policy terms”, he said, as they paid their mortgages and dealt with changes in the job market. Ed Miliband Labour conference 2011 Labour conference David Blunkett Daniel Boffey guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …In his weekly radio and Internet address, President Barack Obama said the package of tax cuts and direct spending in his $447 billion jobs bill would put tens of thousands of teachers back to work and modernize at least 35000 schools. (Sept. 24)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media As House Republicans threaten another government shutdown if they don’t get some steep cuts in return for disaster relief and as Democrats look like they’re finally standing up to the hostage taking, what do we get from David Gergen, Gloria Borger and host Anderson Cooper on CNN? More false equivalencies and the “both sides” are playing politics game. For a more honest assessment of what’s going on, here’s more from TPM — CRUNCH TIME: House GOP Jams Senate With Government Funding Bill, Partisan Budget Cuts For Disaster Aid : House Republicans closed ranks just after midnight on Friday morning, and passed legislation to avert a government shutdown at the end of the month. The vote tally was 219-203. But the bill received almost no Democratic support and faces an uncertain future in the U.S. Senate because Republicans have used the funding bill as a vehicle for disaster relief money, and insisted it be paid for by slashing funds for jobs programs Democrats support. Dems say the GOP legislation provides insufficient aid, and sets a dangerous precedent by requiring those funds to be offset with partisan budget cuts. “The bill the House will vote on tonight is not an honest effort at compromise,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) in a statement anticipating its passage. “It fails to provide the relief that our fellow Americans need as they struggle to rebuild their lives in the wake of floods, wildfires and hurricanes, and it will be rejected by the Senate.” A livid Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told reporters Thursday night “We’re fed up with this…we’re sick of it, we’re tired of it.” Democrats are pushing Republicans to strip the disaster aid provisions from the bill entirely and pass a clean funding bill, and separate, emergency, Senate-passed legislation to provide relief to disaster-stricken regions across the country. At her weekly press conference Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) pointed to a potential compromise. Read on… UPDATE: It appears that we had some bipartisan objection to the House’s hostage taking in the Senate — Cram It! Senate Dems And Republicans Reject Holding Disaster Aid Hostage . Gergen and Borger’s hackery from CNN last night below the fold. COOPER: More breaking news tonight, and “Keeping Them Honest.” Here we go again on the brink of a possible government shutdown. All that talk of compromise. Well, maybe just that. Talk. The do- nothing Congress could be living up to the nickname tonight once again. We’re waiting for a crucial vote in the House on a bill to fund the government beyond September 30, and even if it passes, it would only fund the government for seven more weeks. And that’s a big if. The vote on the GOP measure failed in the House last night, 230 to 195, 48 Republicans defected, voted against their party’s own measure, and only six Democrats sided with Republicans. Now the failed vote, some say, has proved to why Congress has just 12 percent approval rating in the latest poll conducted by CBS and the “New York Times.” Conservative Republicans voted against the C.R., Continuing Resolution, because they said there weren’t enough spending cuts to offset the $3. 6 billion in disaster relief money. Now you can decide for yourself if you think funds for disaster relief for agencies like FEMA should only be available if they’re offset by spending cuts elsewhere. This country is in some pretty tough strait for sure, but this is the first time ever, ever, that funding for people affected by things like tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, fires, you name it, have been used as a political edge. And right now, that aid is in limbo until this bill gets passed. “Keeping Them Honest,” just last week, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said he wouldn’t hold up disaster relief. We found this on ThinkProgress.org. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) (CROSSTALK) REP. ERIC CANTOR (R-VA), HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER: No one is holding any money hostage. I also think we can do so responsibly. (END OF VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: He says no one is holding any money hostage. But they are tonight, even though Cantor pointed out his district needs the aid. His district in Virginia was hit by Hurricane Irene and an earthquake last month. House Speaker Boehner seemed caught off guard by last night’s vote. He desperately tried to get his party on board and failed but today at a news conference he dismissed there was any chaos in the ranks and insisted they’re going to reach a deal. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) REP. JOHN BOEHNER (R-OH), SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE: The founders gave us a committee which is now 535 individuals. And trying to get 535 people to come to agreement on anything around here is difficult. But that’s — we’ve known that going in. We’ll work our way through this. I have always been confident that we’ll be able to come to an agreement and we will. (END OF VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: That’s Speaker Boehner earlier today. At this hour, again, we’re waiting for a new vote on the measure. It’s expected any moment. We’ll see if Republicans did in fact reach an agreement as Mr. Boehner said they would. Republican sources tell us that House GOP leaders have in fact unveiled a new proposal to offset the cash wanted for disaster relief by cutting roughly $100 million from a government loan program that granted a $535 million loan guarantee to the now bankrupt and highly controversial Solyndra solar company. The question tonight, will this get the bill pass and avoid a government shutdown. Let’s talk about it with CNN political analysts David Gergen and Gloria Borger. David, what do you make of this? When you hear Congressman Cantor and other Republicans say that they’re not playing politics with disaster relief funding, especially as the possibility of a government shutdown looms, do you buy that? GERGEN: Anderson, I think both sides are going to try to make points. Democrats are going to try to do that over in the Senate, Gloria has been reporting on some of that, to the make points off the FEMA thing. But I have to tell you. I do think they’re going to get something passed. I don’t think there’s going to be a government shutdown. The amount of money at issue here is actually modest. But what this has done, it was one of the things, it was a backdrop to the markets going down so much today. The investors looking, and saying, my god, those people in Washington, they haven’t made peace, they can’t even agree on this little tiny — little bit of business. And it is — it is fueling the sense that they’re not going to be able to get a real bargain on — big bargain on the deficits. GLORIA BORGER, CNN CHIEF POLITICAL ANALYST: Right. GERGEN: They may not be able to live up to the agreement they cut on the debt ceiling back in August. BORGER: Well, you know, Anderson, that’s the whole problem. When they cut this deal on the debt ceiling, they said, when we pass a bill to keep the government running, known as a Continuing Resolution, it’s going to be clean. Then you had these disasters, as you pointed out, and the Republicans in the House say we need to pay for those disasters. And I just got off the phone with the Senate Democratic leadership aide who said to me that if the House bill passes tonight, with more offsets, spending cuts for disaster relief, the Senate will reject it. That Senate Democrats will reject it. And what they eventually will do is pass a clean Continuing Resolution to fund the government with FEMA funding separately and deal with that — don’t forget the FEMA money for these — for disaster relief expires early next week. So we will move from one crisis to another crisis. COOPER: Is this the way business is just going to be done now, David? I mean especially between now and the election? Can anything major get done between now and this presidential election? GERGEN: Anderson, one held out hope for that, I think, a few months ago, that they could actually make some real progress, get some more breakthroughs before the election. I think that hope has diminished sharply in the last few weeks. Everybody here has now gotten into campaign mode. And by the way, this is something President Obama foresaw some months ago. He — this is the very reason he wanted to get a bigger deal in August because he thought, as we got closer in, it was going to be hard. But now the White House has gotten into politics, too. I mean everybody is playing the game. And I think that there’s a growing feeling that big breakthroughs are going to have to wait the next administration, the next president, this president, whoever it is. BORGER: And here’s — GERGEN: And the next Congress. BORGER: And here’s what complicates all of this. What really complicates it, you have a Republican primary going on. Don’t forget, those Republican presidential candidates were all out there, most of them, saying, you cannot even pass an extension of the debt ceiling. You have congressional leaders who may — Republicans — who may feel they want to get something done as I think John Boehner felt early on in this process. But they have to try and be on the same page with their presidential candidates. The presidential candidates are appealing to a Republican primary electorate, which is very, very conservative. And so I think gridlock is in the offing because Republicans’ hands are tied by this primary. COOPER: But even — I mean what’s so frustrating about that is that — I mean we’re seeing today the markets reacting in part to this gridlock. BORGER: Of course. COOPER: I mean this is costing people — this is costing people their 401(k)s, this is costing people money. GERGEN: Exactly. BORGER: And it could cost people their disaster relief, by the way, Anderson. COOPER: Right. BORGER: If that doesn’t go through. GERGEN: That’s exactly right, Anderson. A lot of people’s 401(k)s are — you can measure that through the S&P 500. That’s where a lot of the mutual funds are, for example. S&P 500 is down 7 percent over the last two days. And you know so people are losing, not only their housing value but their — now their 401(k) again taking hits. And that’s what’s so frustrating about this. But I have to say, it’s not just that the Republican candidates are tying their people up and asking for loyalty. Look at Norm Dicks, a Democrat, who was going to vote for this Continuing Resolution. He said he publicly was going to vote for it. Very independent, fine congressman, he came under pressure from his caucus on the Democratic side to vote against this Continuing Resolution, to stop things, because, you know, they’re playing their political game, too. BORGER: Absolutely. I mean they’re playing it on both sides. GERGEN: Right. BORGER: Why do you think the Democrats want to separate out the money for FEMA? GERGEN: Right. BORGER: Because then they can say that the Republicans don’t want to fund disaster relief. COOPER: Right. It’s just games, I mean, back and forth. BORGER: Terrible. GERGEN: Just games. BORGER: Yes. COOPER: Yes. David Gergen and Gloria Borger, appreciate it. Thank you.
Continue reading …This week when President Obama proposed we tax the rich in order to reduce the debt by $4 trillion, he made clear that it’s not class warfare, “It’s math.” But as Jon Stewart discussed on Wednesday night’s “Daily Show,” conservative millionaires aren’t buying it, and if they’re going to win the war they’ll have to make America sympathize with our nation’s “most vulnerable wealthy.” Unlike Stephen Colbert this week, Stewart praised Obama for saying it’s more important to save medicare, medical research and education funds than to let tax code loopholes stay open for the mega-rich. He also went after two rich people who oppose the plan in particular: John Fleming, a businessman who owns 33 Subway restaurants (among other things) and Fox News host Bill O’Reilly. In Fleming’s case, even though he made over $6 million last year, after spouting some questionable math he claimed he was only left with a mere $200,000 a year to “feed his family.” Well, hopefully he was watching the show last night, because Stewart turned him on to this great sandwich place where you can get 12 inches of food for $5. And then there’s Bill O’Reilly, who said on his show this week that he’ll quit his job if taxes are raised on the rich. Naturally, Stewart was all for this. We’re not sure how that’s a threat to anyone but O’Reilly. But perhaps it was “Fox & Friends” who put the plight of the wealthy in the clearest terms with a bar graph showing how millionaires are disappearing from the United States. “We’d put them on the endangered species list, but we all know how much they hate government regulation,” Stewart joked. Watch the full segment below, especially the end where Stewart’s segment slowly devolves into one of those sad Sarah McLachlan commercials, but instead of dogs you’re saving James Merriweather Phillips. WATCH:
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — NASA’s dead six-ton satellite fell to Earth early Saturday morning, starting its fiery death plunge somewhere over the vast Pacific Ocean. Details were still sketchy, but the U.S. Air Force’s Joint Space Operations Center and NASA say that the bus-sized satellite first penetrated Earth’s atmosphere somewhere over the Pacific Ocean. That doesn’t necessarily mean it all fell into the sea. NASA’s calculations had predicted that the former climate research satellite would fall over a 500-mile swath. The two government agencies say the 35-foot satellite fell sometime between 11:23 p.m. EDT and 1:09 a.m. EDT. NASA said it didn’t know the precise time or location yet. Some 26 pieces of the satellite – representing 1,200 pounds of heavy metal – were expected to rain down somewhere. The biggest surviving chunk should be no more than 300 pounds. The Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite is the biggest NASA spacecraft to crash back to Earth, uncontrolled, since the post-Apollo 75-ton Skylab space station and the more than 10-ton Pegasus 2 satellite, both in 1979. Russia’s 135-ton Mir space station slammed through the atmosphere in 2001, but it was a controlled dive into the Pacific. Before UARS fell, no one had ever been hit by falling space junk and NASA expected that not to change. NASA put the chances that somebody somewhere on Earth would get hurt at 1-in-3,200. But any one person’s odds of being struck were estimated at 1-in-22 trillion, given there are 7 billion people on the planet.
Continue reading …This week was packed with news on the mobile front, so it was easy to miss a few stories here and there. Here’s some of the other stuff that happened in the wide world of wireless for the week of September 19, 2011: Opera Software, builder of the popular mobile browser, announced it was acquiring Handster, an app store platform that supports Android, WP7, BlackBerry, and Symbian. [ TechCrunch ] Samsung unveiled three new HSDPA feature phones destined for India: the Champ 3.5G (S3770), Primo (S5610) and Chat 527 (S5270). [ UnwiredView and SammyHub ] A leaked image indicates the HTC Hero S will be coming to US Cellular in the near future. The device appears to be the Kingdom, and is expected to feature a 1.2GHz single-core Qualcomm CPU, 768MB of RAM, a 4-inch qHD display and Gingerbread. [ PocketNow ] Speaking of US Cellular, the Motorola Electrify officially became available for purchase online this week (expected in stores on September 26th), and can be yours for $200 after a $100 mail-in rebate. [ AndroidCentral ] Wirefly accidentally outed press renders of the Samsung Stratosphere — on the retailer’s Pantech Breakout page. The images have since been removed. [ OwenJohnston ] A white version of the Samsung Galaxy S II is making the rounds in the UK , but we learned this week that Bell Canada will be launching it well before the holidays. Interestingly, the device in the image (seen above) has retained the global version’s three-button layout, a stark contrast to every other Galaxy S II device we’ve seen in North America so far. [ MobileSyrup ] Among the barrage of new phones Sprint’s releasing on October 2nd is the BlackBerry Curve 9350, according to another leaked employee memo. The price will likely be $80 after a $50 mail-in rebate. [ CrackBerry ] T-Mobile MVNO Simple Mobile announced a new unlimited prepaid plan for BlackBerry devices for $60 / month, which includes access to T-Mo’s HSPA+ network. [ N4BB ] Huawei appears to have outed press images of the Honor , which is said to have a 4-inch FWVGA LCD, Gingerbread, 1.4GHz CPU (no specifics known yet), and an 8MP rear camera accompanied by a front-facing cam (again, no details on the resolution here). [ EuroDroid ] A member of the iPhone Dev Team has released a new version of Redsn0w, its popular iOS jailbreaking software, known as 0.9.9b1. Check the link to get the full list of new features. [ Technobolt ] Mobile Miscellany: week of September 19, 2011 originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …NASA gives 1-hour window for falling satellite NASA Satellite UARS Re-Entry Predicted Friday Afternoon EMERGENCY NASA SATELLITE UPDATE SEPT 22 2011 WARNING cosmostv says: Reports of Falling NASA Satellite UARS debris in Canada ~ COSMOS TV LATEST NEWS http://t.co/FfMjT6g7
Continue reading …News item: The Lindberg Road bridge project in West Lafayette now will be done by the end of October. Not by the Oct. 1 Purdue-Notre Dame game (the latest prediction). Not by mid-August (the original finish date). Lindberg Road drivers have been through this before, given past projects that dragged on. That cartoon last week by the J&C’s Dave Sattler haunts: “They say it’s going to open Oct. 1 …
Continue reading …Man fires air gun as pontiff leads mass for 30,000 in Erfurt following meetings with German victims of paedophile priests Pope Benedict XVI has led an outdoor mass in Germany despite shots being fired close to the service. A man fired an air-gun at a guard at the edge of the security zone about an hour before the service in the eastern city of Erfurt, Vatican and local officials said. The pope’s spokesman, the Reverend Federico Lombardi, said there was “no worry” among the papal entourage about the incident, and the pontiff was not informed about it before the mass, which was attended by 30,000 people. Police said the alleged shooter had been arrested and that there were no injuries. The service came after the pope met German victims of paedophile priests in a bid to stem the loss of support for the Catholic Church in the country. Last night he met two women and three men from parishes across the country, who were among the abused. The Vatican said the pope expressed “deep compassion and regret” at the suffering of those who were abused and assured them that the Catholic Church is seeking “effective measures to protect children”. Victims have accused the pope of being part of a systematic cover-up by the church hierarchy for paedophile priests in his earlier roles as an archbishop in Germany, and later when he headed the Vatican morals office. Survivors’ groups were quick to denounce the pope’s meeting with victims as an empty gesture. They maintain the Catholic Church has not done enough to prosecute offending priests and prevent future abuse. Following the mass in Erfurt, the pontiff departed for the south-western city of Freiburg, the final stop of his four-day visit. Pope Benedict XVI Germany Religion Europe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …