Up to 181,000 migrants are living in Britain on visas that have expired over the last two years, the National Audit Office says There are as many as 181,000 migrants living in Britain on visas that have expired over the last two years, according to Whitehall’s spending watchdog. A National Audit Office (NAO) report published today says the United Kingdom Border Agency (UKBA) fails to carry out its own checks on whether overstayers have left the country and instead relies on employers to police their own staff. The NAO says that the new points-based immigration system has been a welcome simplification of the previous labyrinthine work visas system, but it cannot yet ensure proper controls over migration or meet Britain’s needs for skilled labour. The report says that while 80% of those who applied through “tier one”, the most highly skilled route, are working in appropriate jobs, most of the skilled migrants who came through “tier two” are not currently working in jobs in national shortage occupations. UKBA still lacks the ability to identify easily individuals whose visas have expired and does not do enough to check that migrants leave Britain if they have no right to remain, the report adds. One UKBA region has contacted applicants whose visas have not been renewed and encouraged about 2,000 to leave since 2009, but “while UKBA has some contact details for an estimated 181,000 failed applicants overall, it cannot be sure how many have left the UK,” the report says. The Whitehall auditors say that the points-based system is not yet delivering value for money. The report says that the development of the computer system at the heart of the programme has had a chequered history. An initial forecast of potential savings was downgraded from £224m to £65m. The supplier, Fujitsu, initially underestimated the complexity of the project, while UKBA paid the company £4m in 2007 to develop applications that were not used. The NAO says that further improvements are still needed. Margaret Hodge, chair of the Commons public accounts committee, said that part of the problem was that UKBA relied on employers to police their own employees. Damian Green, the immigration minister, said the report highlighted why the government was introducing radical reforms. “We are committed to reintroducing exit checks by 2015. Counting people in and out of the country will give us better control over those that overstay,” he said. Immigration and asylum Damian Green Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Bill introduces ‘public interest’ defence, aims to end ‘libel tourism’ and signals end to use of juries in most libel trials The government on Tuesday unveiled sweeping changes to the libel laws aimed at protecting freedom of speech and bringing an end to so-called “libel tourism” from abroad. Ken Clarke, the justice secretary, published a draft bill that includes a new “public interest” defence which can be used by defendants in defamation cases and a requirement that claims can demonstrate substantial harm before they can sue. The bill will also signal an end to the use of juries in libel trials apart from in exceptional circumstances, and aims to end libel tourism by making it tougher to bring overseas claims which have little connection to the UK in the English courts. Clarke, unveiling the draft bill on Tuesday alongside minister of state for justice Lord McNally, said the bill would “ensure that anyone who makes a statement of fact or expresses an honest opinion can do so with confidence”. “The right to speak freely and debate issues without fear of censure is a vital cornerstone of a democratic society,” he added. “In recent years, though, the increased threat of costly libel actions has begun to have a chilling effect on scientific and academic debate and investigative journalism.” The bill includes a new statutory defence of truth which will replace the current common law defence of justification. It also includes a statutory defence of honest opinion replacing the current common law defence of fair and honest comment. In a bid to stamp out libel tourism, a court will not accept jurisdiction unless satisfied that England and Wales is “clearly” the most appropriate place to bring the action against someone who does not live in the UK or an EU member state. The bill will also remove the presumption in favour of jury trial as part of a series of measures to cut costs and speed up court cases. The government has also begun a consultation on issues not covered by the draft bill, including responsibility for publication on the internet. It will ask whether the law should be changed to give greater protection to secondary publishers such as internet service providers and discussion forms. More details soon… •
Continue reading …Bill introduces ‘public interest’ defence, aims to end ‘libel tourism’ and signals end to use of juries in most libel trials The government on Tuesday unveiled sweeping changes to the libel laws aimed at protecting freedom of speech and bringing an end to so-called “libel tourism” from abroad. Ken Clarke, the justice secretary, published a draft bill that includes a new “public interest” defence which can be used by defendants in defamation cases and a requirement that claims can demonstrate substantial harm before they can sue. The bill will also signal an end to the use of juries in libel trials apart from in exceptional circumstances, and aims to end libel tourism by making it tougher to bring overseas claims which have little connection to the UK in the English courts. Clarke, unveiling the draft bill on Tuesday alongside minister of state for justice Lord McNally, said the bill would “ensure that anyone who makes a statement of fact or expresses an honest opinion can do so with confidence”. “The right to speak freely and debate issues without fear of censure is a vital cornerstone of a democratic society,” he added. “In recent years, though, the increased threat of costly libel actions has begun to have a chilling effect on scientific and academic debate and investigative journalism.” The bill includes a new statutory defence of truth which will replace the current common law defence of justification. It also includes a statutory defence of honest opinion replacing the current common law defence of fair and honest comment. In a bid to stamp out libel tourism, a court will not accept jurisdiction unless satisfied that England and Wales is “clearly” the most appropriate place to bring the action against someone who does not live in the UK or an EU member state. The bill will also remove the presumption in favour of jury trial as part of a series of measures to cut costs and speed up court cases. The government has also begun a consultation on issues not covered by the draft bill, including responsibility for publication on the internet. It will ask whether the law should be changed to give greater protection to secondary publishers such as internet service providers and discussion forms. More details soon… •
Continue reading …Bill introduces ‘public interest’ defence, aims to end ‘libel tourism’ and signals end to use of juries in most libel trials The government on Tuesday unveiled sweeping changes to the libel laws aimed at protecting freedom of speech and bringing an end to so-called “libel tourism” from abroad. Ken Clarke, the justice secretary, published a draft bill that includes a new “public interest” defence which can be used by defendants in defamation cases and a requirement that claims can demonstrate substantial harm before they can sue. The bill will also signal an end to the use of juries in libel trials apart from in exceptional circumstances, and aims to end libel tourism by making it tougher to bring overseas claims which have little connection to the UK in the English courts. Clarke, unveiling the draft bill on Tuesday alongside minister of state for justice Lord McNally, said the bill would “ensure that anyone who makes a statement of fact or expresses an honest opinion can do so with confidence”. “The right to speak freely and debate issues without fear of censure is a vital cornerstone of a democratic society,” he added. “In recent years, though, the increased threat of costly libel actions has begun to have a chilling effect on scientific and academic debate and investigative journalism.” The bill includes a new statutory defence of truth which will replace the current common law defence of justification. It also includes a statutory defence of honest opinion replacing the current common law defence of fair and honest comment. In a bid to stamp out libel tourism, a court will not accept jurisdiction unless satisfied that England and Wales is “clearly” the most appropriate place to bring the action against someone who does not live in the UK or an EU member state. The bill will also remove the presumption in favour of jury trial as part of a series of measures to cut costs and speed up court cases. The government has also begun a consultation on issues not covered by the draft bill, including responsibility for publication on the internet. It will ask whether the law should be changed to give greater protection to secondary publishers such as internet service providers and discussion forms. More details soon… •
Continue reading …With the top US commander in Afghanistan offering Congress his first formal assessment of the war in Afghanistan, a leading Republican is asserting that the US and its NATO allies are turning around the conflict. (March 15)
Continue reading …With the top US commander in Afghanistan offering Congress his first formal assessment of the war in Afghanistan, a leading Republican is asserting that the US and its NATO allies are turning around the conflict. (March 15)
Continue reading …With the top US commander in Afghanistan offering Congress his first formal assessment of the war in Afghanistan, a leading Republican is asserting that the US and its NATO allies are turning around the conflict. (March 15)
Continue reading …Speaking at the LA premiere of their alien comedy ‘Paul’ actors Simon Pegg, Nick Frost and Jane Lynch turn their thoughts to the people of Japan in the aftermath of last week’s earthquake. (March 15)
Continue reading …Speaking at the LA premiere of their alien comedy ‘Paul’ actors Simon Pegg, Nick Frost and Jane Lynch turn their thoughts to the people of Japan in the aftermath of last week’s earthquake. (March 15)
Continue reading …Speaking at the LA premiere of their alien comedy ‘Paul’ actors Simon Pegg, Nick Frost and Jane Lynch turn their thoughts to the people of Japan in the aftermath of last week’s earthquake. (March 15)
Continue reading …