St. Patrick’s Day: from Ireland to America Day 152 – Happy Saint Patrick’s Day corned beef cabbage st patricks day irish The Stir: Hate Corned Beef and Cabbage? What to Eat on St … Over the years, I’ve sought out other Irish recipes so I can still show my Irish pride and honor the cuisine of the country, but not have to choke down the corned beef and cabbage. Corned Beef on Rye with Mustardy Coleslaw & Caramelized Onions … If popular tradition had won us over, we’d be toasting pints of Guinness in leprechaun hats and forking up mouthfuls of corned beef with cabbage and potatoes right about now. But as much as I hold dear that classic meal, it just didn’t … Closet Cooking: Corned Beef , Cabbage and Kimchi Burrito I had to change my plans and I decided to go with my all time favourite St. Patrick’s Day meal, the apricot glazed corned beef with sauteed cabbage and colcannon which in addition to being amazingly tasty it is also easy to make since … Guanabee | No Really: Corned Beef And Cabbage Tacos This St. Patrick’s Day, freak out your Irish friends with this recipe for corned beef and cabbage tacos. Leftover Corned Beef Recipes Corned Beef and Potato Casserole Got lots of leftover corned beef ? Take a look at these tasty recipes using leftover corned beef , including soups, casseroles, sandwiches, and more. Recipes: Leftover Corned Beef Recipes. Related Recipes: … shelleygwen says: corned beef , cabbage, potatos. car bombs. please excuse my asshole tomorrow. #stpatricksday
Continue reading …Deputy prime minister had been due to argue case for a change to ‘new and better’ voting system at Lib Dem yes to AV campaign Nick Clegg has pulled out of the launch of the Liberal Democrats’ yes to AV campaign launch to attend an emergency cabinet meeting on Libya . The deputy prime minister was planning to defy calls for him to “lie low” in the referendum for voting system reform by speaking at the launch of the Liberal Democrats’ yes to AV campaign launch in Manchester on Friday, which will now go ahead without him. Clegg was forced to ditch his plans as the cabinet met to prepare plans to protect the Libyan rebel stronghold of Benghazi after the UN security council voted in favour of a no-fly zone and air strikes against Muammar Gaddafi’s forces. The Liberal Democrat leader was billed to argue the case for a change to a “new and better” voting system “with passion”. The alternative vote is not proportional and was described by Clegg before the general election as a “miserable little compromise”, but it was the best the Lib Dems could secure in coalition negotiations with the Tories as a step change away from first past the post system. The issue has drawn dividing lines between him and David Cameron, who in line with the vast majority of his MPs is in favour of the existing system. Labour is split on the issue, with many high-profile veteran MPs and peers leading a vocal no campaign at odds with Miliband’s support for the change. Clegg had prepared to cast the referendum as a battle “not between left and right” but between “reformers and conservatives”. AV Electoral reform Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• UN backs no-fly zone and air strikes against Libya • Arab countries to join operation • Gaddafi denounces vote as ‘flagrant colonisation’ • US and UK play down prospect of immediate strikes • Read the Guardian’s main news story on the crisis 10.14am: : ABC, the Australian news channel, reports that hours before the decision was taken on the no-fly zone, a power station was bombed outside Benghazi . Separately, below the line thea1mighty has posted a link to this Youtube footage of a fuel tank that was apparently bombed at Ezwetina power station, outside Ajdabiya overnight. thea1mighty writes: This was a fuel tank that was bombed. This station is holding power grids which lights up the whole area from Sirt along to Benghazi, so if it will catch all fire and burn then we will have no light no more at all we will lose power by the end of the day tomorrow because it’s catching fire all over. They are trying to control it. 10.03am: Al Arabiya news channel is reporting that an unspecified number of people were killed and wounded in the raids on Misurata this morning . The television station also said several mosques, schools and residential buildings were badly damaged in the attack on the city, about 200 km (130 miles) east of Tripoli. “This morning I spoke to a doctor in Misrata, there is heavy bombardment there, explosions inside the city,” Tariq, a doctor from Misrata who now lives in Britain told Al Arabiya. He said he spoke by phone to colleagues and relatives there on Friday morning. “They cannot send out any ambulances. They think it’s artillery and tanks, shelling, not air strikes. It’s very worrying,” he said. 9.52am: Kim Willsher reports from Paris that France is “ready to launch air strikes on Libya within the next few hours” – according to a spokesman for the French government. Kim says British planes are also on standby to start the first attack – “which sources say will involve a joint operation of six French and six British planes”. Here’s more from Kim: Speaking on French radio government spokesman Francois Baroin said military intervention against Colonel Gaddafi would happen “rapidly…in a few hours” but said he would not say “when, how, on what targets and in what form”. “France will take part in military operations agains Libya,” Baroin said adding “it is not a question of occupying Libyan territory…but a tool of a military nature to protect the Libyan people and allow them to achieve their aim of liberty and therefore the fall of the Gaddafi regime.” “The French, who were at the forefront of this demand (for intervention) will naturally follow through with a military intervention in which they will participate.” He said he was disappointed the Germans had not supported the French and British over the United Nations resolution approving the imposition of a no fly zone and targeted strikes on Libya. Ten countries approved the vote of the UN Security Council, while five countries, including Germany, Russia and China abstained. 9.46am: @ChangeinLibya tweets on the situation in Misrata: Misrata is reported to be under a huge armoured attack but the revolutionaries captured a few and burnt others there today. #libya #feb17 9.43am: Following Eurocontrol’s tweet that Tripoli is “not accepting any traffic”. Twitter user @mpoppel asked if that means all airports in Libya are closed, Eurocontrol replied: “As I understand, it means that Libya has closed its airspace”. 9.37am: Europe’s air traffic control agency says Libya has closed its airspace to all traffic. Eurocontrol told airlines: “The latest information from Malta indicates that Tripoli (air control centre) does not accept traffic.” The agency’s map of air traffic over Europe and the Mediterranean showed that Libyan air space was off limits. 9.35am: My colleague, Hélène Mulholland, has some British reaction to the UN vote. Colonel Bob Stewart, Conservative MP for Beckenham and former commander of UN forces in Bosnia, said the no fly zone should be easier than the one in Bosnia, which he said “wasn’t effective”. “I’m quite certain it’s a different situation in Libya. You’ve only got to protect the coastal literal where the population are and it’s a relatively easier than flying above the mountains of Bosnia. So this is going to be a tremendous boost to the so called rebels and it will give Gaddafi a headache because he will have to try and work out whether to push on hard and get through to Benghazi.” Sir Jeremy Greenstock, former UK ambassador to the UN, said the aim of the resolution had to be to end the Gaddafi regime. “It’s not the point to have no Libyan aircraft flying, the point is to stop Libyan tanks, Libyan artillery, and Libyan troops murdering their own people and that’s going to be quite difficult still from the sky,” he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme. “Success is the end of this regime. Otherwise we are up there flying for a very long time if they are still in Tripoli and he [Gaddafi] will come back if we go away. The future is pretty misty on that front. So we want this regime to go. and maybe people around him will desert him when they see the odds are stacked against him.” 9.15am: The rebel-held town of Misrata, in western Libya, has come under fire from tanks and heavy artillery from Gaddafi’s forces, according to the Al Arabiya news channel. “The bombardment started about two or three hours ago, and has continued until now,” Saadoun al-Misrati, an anti-Gaddafi protester told Al Arabiya. He said it was a heavy bombardment using tanks and heavy artillery targeting civilians. Al Arabiya also reported there were an unspecified number of killed and wounded in the attack. Rebels in Misrata, the last big opposition stronghold in western Libya, had earlier said they were preparing for a new attack on Thursday and had rejected reported offers from the government to negotiate their surrender. 9.12am: The Americans said it was crucial to get Arab support before they agreed to a no-fly zone and air strikes against Gaddafi’s troops. It appears that Egypt is already on board. The Wall Street Journal reports that Egypt has begun sending arms over the border to Libyan rebels with US knowledge . Earlier in the week, Malcolm Rifkind, formerly a defence and foreign secretary, argued that Egypt should send a brigade to stop Gaddafi’s advance on Benghazi. Here’s an extract from the WSJ. The shipments – mostly small arms such as assault rifles and ammunition—appear to be the first confirmed case of an outside government arming the rebel fighters. Those fighters have been losing ground for days in the face of a steady westward advance by forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi… “We know the Egyptian military council is helping us, but they can’t be so visible,” said Hani Souflakis, a Libyan businessman in Cairo who has been acting as a rebel liaison with the Egyptian government since the uprising began. “Weapons are getting through,” said Mr Souflakis, who says he has regular contacts with Egyptian officials in Cairo and the rebel leadership in Libya. “Americans have given the green light to the Egyptians to help. The Americans don’t want to be involved in a direct level, but the Egyptians wouldn’t do it if they didn’t get the green light.” 9.04am: A bevy of cabinet officials, including Liam Fox, the defence secretary, and William Hague, the foreign secretary, have been arriving at Downing Street for the top-level meeting on Libya. None have responded to reporters’ questions. David Cameron is scheduled to address parliament around 11am. 8.54am: The Guardian’s Paris correspondent, Angelique Chrisafis, tweets : French air strikes on #Libya to begin imminently, according to government spokesman 8.53am: Senior US officials gave a classified briefing to senators on Capitol Hill yesterday on possible American military action in Libya. Here are some interesting snippets from senators who were briefed, courtesy of The Cable on the Foreign Policy website . Senator Lindsey Graham: “I learned that it’s not too late, that the opposition forces are under siege but they are holding, and that with a timely intervention, a no-fly zone and no-drive zone, we can turn this thing around.” Asked exactly what the first wave of attacks would look like, Graham said, “We ground his aircraft and some tanks start getting blown up that are headed toward the opposition forces.” Senator Mark Kirk told reporters that he expected the military operations to be run out of Sicily, where Nato base Sigonella and US naval air station Sigonella are located. “It seems that the administration is moving and now the only question is time,” said Kirk. “A lot still depends on the rebels at the very least holding Benghazi. If they do, there may be time for the international political system to respond. If they collapse quickly, no.” 8.39am: Libyans celebrate in Benghazi after last night’s vote in the UN security council. Photograph: Patrick Baz/AFP/Getty Images 8.37am: Reuters is reporting that Misrata, the last rebel-held city in the west, is coming under heavy bombardment . 8.25am: How will the no-fly zone work? Al Jazeera has this handy report explaining which bases and which US aircraft carriers will be involved. The Guardian’s Richard Norton-Taylor also goes into considerable detail on the practicalities of a no-fly zone . 8.04am: Good morning and welcome to live coverage of Libya following last night’s dramatic vote at the UN, which paves the way for possible military action by the west and some Arab countries against Muammar Gaddafi. For the Libyan rebels it must seem as if the US or western cavalry is riding to the rescue. Celebratory gunfire and fireworks filled the skies over Benghazi after the UN security council voted in favour of a no-fly zone and air strikes to stop Gaddafi’s forces. But details of any US military action were still unclear. The US air force chief of staff, General Norton Schwartz, told Congress it would take as much as a week to impose a no-fly zone over Libya. Downing Street has also cautioned against earlier suggestions that British planes could be in action “within hours” and declined to put a timetable on operations. David Cameron will chair an emergency cabinet meeting to discuss the next steps this morning before addressing MPs in the Commons, so that might provide pointers on the timing of any military action. Even before the security council’s 10-0 vote, the Obama administration prepared plans to enforce the no-fly zone, with congressional officials describing a closed-door briefing in which the administration said it could ground Gaddafi’s air force by Sunday or Monday. The effort is likely to involve jet fighters, bombers and surveillance aircraft, officials said. The US is pressing Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to take part in the operation. Much will depend on how Gaddafi reacts to his increasing isolation. Before the UN’s uncharacteristically decisive action – following days of American fence-sitting – Gaddafi had declared that there we be no mercy against those put up a fight in Benghazi. There was also blood-curdling rhetoric about disruption of air and maritime traffic in the Mediterranean. This morning, his son Saif al-Islam is reported as saying that Libya is not afraid of the UN resolution. Here is the Guardian’s overnight coverage UN security council backs no-fly zone and air strikes Gaddafi threatens retaliation in Mediterranean as UN passes resolution Libya finally forces Barack Obama’s hand as he goes for broke Libya ‘no-fly’ vote a significant moment for David Cameron Arab and Middle East protests Libya Bahrain Saudi Arabia Egypt Yemen Tunisia Iran Iraq United Nations Mark Tran Adam Gabbatt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Jennifer Lawrence: Hunger Games Role For Oscar-Nominated Actress … JENNIFER Lawrence has landed the coveted lead role in The Hunger Games franchise. The 20-year-old Oscar nominee will play Katniss Everdeen, a girl who joins. Jennifer Lawrence Hunger Games Suzanne Collins Katniss … By Sean O’Connell Hollywoodnews.com: Oscar-nominee Jennifer Lawrence has landed the lead role in Gary Ross’s planned adaptation of “The Hunger. Jennifer Lawrence: Hunger Games Role For Actress Jennifer Lawrence … JENNIFER Lawrence has landed the coveted lead role in The Hunger Games franchise. The 20-year-old Oscar nominee will play Katniss Everdeen, a girl who joins. Jennifer Lawrence: 'Hunger Games ' Lead Confirmed! | CelebrityStir … Jennifer Lawrence: ‘Hunger Games ‘ Lead Confirmed! Jennifer Lawrence has scored the lead role in the big screen adaptation of Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games, JustJared.com can confirm. The 20-year-old Academy Award nominated actress … Hunger Games (2012) Ross, Lawrence – DVD Talk Forum DVD Reviews, DVD Talk Headlines, HD Reviews. Add to My Yahoo! – RSS 2.0 – RSS 2.0 – DVD Talk Podcast RSS -. Go Back · DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk. Hunger Games (2012) Ross, Lawrence. User Name, Remember Me? … nadja_m says: @cayayofm It's official Jennifer Lawrence Hunger Games Lead Confirmed…this will be quite interesting.
Continue reading …Smartphones continue to improve in the “smart” areas: better screens, faster processors, more memory, etc., but there’s not been a lot of innovation in the phone aspect of those devices. HD voice technology can change that, but since its introduction in 2009 , hi-fi calling was only available on GSM networks… until now. Ericsson has just made the first HD voice call via CDMA — made possible by a new Enhanced Variable Rate Codec Narrowband-Wideband (EVRC-NW for the awkward acronym-loving crowd). The codec delivers sound in the 50Hz – 7000Hz range, which makes traditional calls limited to the 300Hz – 3400Hz spectrum sound like they’re coming from a drive-thru attendant at your local Mickey D’s. So far, the tech’s limited to the lab, but here’s hoping Ericsson lets it roam free to deliver the dulcet tones of our friends and family sooner rather than later. Continue reading Ericsson delivers HD voice on CDMA, crystal clear calling coming to a network near you Ericsson delivers HD voice on CDMA, crystal clear calling coming to a network near you originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …According to a new national survey, just 13 percent of Americans feel “very confident” they will have a comfortable retirement. That’s a record low. At the same time, a record 27 percent of Americans report they are “not at all confident” in being able to save their way toward a comfortable retirement. That’s two sides of the same troubling coin. What should be a life stage that we look forward to has become a major source of anxiety instead. I hear it in your voices and see it in your faces when you talk to me. Your fears about being able to retire comfortably and with dignity are weighing you down. It’s hard to enjoy the present when you’re worried about the future. That’s no way to live. I have no quick or easy fix to offer, but I do have a way forward. Stand In Your Truth You probably think your retirement hinges on a multitude of financial decisions — choosing the right asset allocation for your 401(k); figuring out if you should convert to a Roth IRA; deciding whether to pay off the mortgage before retirement or focus on saving more. Those are indeed all vitally important issues to navigate. But even more crucial to putting you on a more confident path is the singular act of standing in your truth — that is, taking a fresh accounting of where you are at today, and where you want to be 20, or 30 or 40 years from now. Sound simple? Well, not based on my experience. When I ask people how much they have saved for retirement in their 401(k), they typically start by saying, “Well, before the crash…” Or when I ask someone what their house is worth, the response I get is something along the lines of, “Well, we paid…” or, “Back in 2007 it was worth…” I didn’t ask what you had in the past. I asked what you have today. It is only when you are willing to take a clear-eyed look at where you stand today that you can build a more secure future. Live Below Your Means But Within Your Needs The single most common lament I hear when it comes to retirement is, “I wish I could save for retirement, but I just don’t have the money left over at the end of the month to invest.” My reply: If you can’t afford to save while you have a paycheck coming in, how are you going to be able to pay the bills when you retire? Don’t expect Social Security to do the heavy lifting for you; the current average retirement benefit is less than $1,200 a month. If retirement comfort is what you’re after, Social Security should be seen as a complement to your personal savings, not a total solution. And to generate those savings, you need to find a way to live below your means, so you in fact have some money each month that can be saved for your future. If that seems impossible, I think you are still a few steps short of standing in your truth. Take Care Of Your Kids By Taking Care Of Your Retirement Needs There is simply no bigger gift you can give your kids than the assurance that you will in fact be financially secure when you retire. If you’re currently in a position where you are helping out your parents, or are worried about their security, I imagine this is abundantly clear. But are you doing your very best to make sure your own kids will not have the same worries and responsibilities? This is never my most popular advice, but it is in fact my most important: Make saving for your retirement your priority. If that means your child attends public school rather than private so you can focus on your 401(k) and IRAs rather than tuitions, that’s the honest move to make. If that means your child attends a less expensive college because you don’t save as much in a 529 plan, or your child has to rely on federal Stafford loans and financial aid, so be it. An affordable college education is one that does not derail the parents’ retirement savings. Find The Pleasure In Saving If all that sounds like drudgery, I think you’re missing a great opportunity to shed layers of financial anxiety. There is no question that saving more today means spending less today. There’s no way around that simple fact. But rather than see this as an exercise in denying yourself spending pleasures, what if you managed to find an equal pleasure in saving? After all, it is the saving you can manage today that will put a comfortable retirement well within your reach. *** Suze Orman’s new book, “The Money Class: Learn to Create Your New American Dream” (Spiegel & Grau), includes more than 100 pages of detailed strategies to boost your retirement confidence. Learn more about Suze at www.SuzeOrman.com.
Continue reading …Parenting experts aren’t too pleased with Mattel’s “Monster High Clawdeen Wolf” doll, which they claim is teaching children a few problematic lessons about body image. Clawdeen’s bio explains that she’s a 15-year-old werewolf, “a fierce fashionista with a confident no-nonsense attitude. I’m also gorgeous, intimidating, and absolutely loyal to my friends.” And her Freaky Flaw? “Freaky Flaw: My hair is worthy of a shampoo commercial and that’s just what grows on my legs. Plucking and shaving is definitely a full time job but that’s a small price to pay for being scarily fabulous.” The doll is usually picked up by 5-to 7-year-old girls and marketed toward tweens and teens. Psychologist Dale Atkins told “The Today Show,” “When we have these ridiculous models — sexualized children, and horses with long eyelashes that are flirtatious and all of that — it sets up this ideal of beauty and body image that kids have to pay attention to because they can’t not pay attention to it. And they feel less good as they’re trying to develop a good sense about their own bodies.” However, Margaux Vega, a spokeswoman for Mattel told “Today,” “Monster High is all about celebrating your imperfections and accepting the imperfections of others. Clawdeen Wolf is the teenage daughter of a werewolf. In the webisodes, she has to shave and wax and pluck between classes. Girls of a certain age know about the embarrassment of unwanted hair in unwanted places.” And Senior Public Relations Manager for Toys R’ Us Bob Friedland told FOX411 that Clawdeen is super popular: “We haven’t had any complaints from parents, customers who are buying this doll are very happy with the product and we cannot keep the dolls on the shelves.” Take a look at Clawdeen and tell us what you think. (Via Jezebel, Shine)
Continue reading …It is absolutely horrible to go unappreciated. Unfortunately for these authors, most of them remained completely unrecognized during life, and did not become famous until after their deaths. Now, all of them, from Thoreau to Stieg Larsson, are widely read and widely known. Most of the following authors are found in anthologies, taught in every English Literature course, and have even had their works (or their lives) adapted for film or television. Some also received literary prizes posthumously. Did we forget any of your favorite authors who only reached fame after death? Let us know in the comments!
Continue reading …Well, this brings puppy love to a whole new level. An 11-month-old red Tibetan mastiff has become the world’s most expensive dog after being purchased in China for 10 million yuan (just over $1.5 million). Although the specifics of the sale are confidential, the seller divulged that a multi-millionaire coal baron from northern China purchased the Tibetan mastiff, affectionately called “Big Splash,” or “Hong Dong” in Chinese. “When I started in this business, ten years ago, I never thought we would see such a price,” Mr. Lu of the Tibetan Mastiff Garden in Laoshan, told The Telegraph. Tibetan mastiffs are an ancient breed long revered as adept guard dogs. This particular Tibetan mastiff puppy is considered “a perfect specimen,” and Lu estimates that the buyer could recoup his investment in the dog in just a few years by hiring it out to other breeders for as much as 100,000 yuan each. While Tibetan mastiffs have long been a cultural staple revered in Asia, they have increasingly taken on a more heightened role as a status symbol representing affluence in China. With so many dogs around the world lacking homes and being euthanized in shelters as a result, is it acceptable to place such a high price on a single dog? Or should certain breeds be preserved and considered more valuable than others? Weigh in with your thoughts in the comments below. And remember, if you have a welcoming home to offer to a new canine friend, you don’t need to shell out $1.5 million, but could find a dog just as lovable and in need of a family for far less at PetFinder.com. CLICK HERE for some adorable pics of Tibetan mastiffs.
Continue reading …Did Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene Split?! (Info in description) PLUS: Joe’s Details Photoshoot Breaking News!!!!!! – Joe Jonas And Ashley Greene Split Up! Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene Split | Extra Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene Split . March 17, 2011 | Couples News. Singer Joe Jonas and “Twilight” star Ashley Greene have called it quits. Jonas-Greene.jp. Reps for both stars confirmed to UsMagazine, “We can confirm they both have … Joe Jonas And Ashley Greene Split Up Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene have reportedly split up. The couple, who were together for around nine months, have called time on their relationship after. Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene split up – The Marquee Blog – CNN.com … Well isn’t this awkward? Just as Joe Jonas is gushing about his romance with Ashley Greene in the new issue of Details, their reps have announced that the couple have split. Current Twitter trends: Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene split , Vanuatu … Twitter users are sharing the three words they live by with the most popular Twitter hashtag on March 17, “#threewordstoliveby.” Joe Jonas Ashley Greene split | Joe Jonas Ashley Greene breakup … Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene Split . Rating. Ashley Greene Details Joe Jonas Twilight. 11:18 am, March 17th, 2011. (GettyImages.com). Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene have broken up, their reps confirm. The couple is said to have parted ways … SageLovesJoeJ says: Joe Jonas and Ashley Greene split , reps confirm – Entertainment – NZ Herald News http://t.co/Cs5DFKh via @nzherald
Continue reading …