City of Bremen to take drastic action to tackle out-of-control feline population, which threatens local songbirds All stray cats in the north German city of Bremen are to be neutered under plans by the local council which campaigners hope could be extended to the whole country. The drastic measure has been proposed by Bremen’s interior minister, Ulrich Mäurer, in an attempt to control the city’s burgeoning feline population, which is threatening local songbirds. The local cat shelter used to look after around 120 cats at any one time. Now it has 378 on its books and fears that number will soon reach 500. In addition, at least 1,000 stray cats roam the streets, chasing birds and, it is feared, spreading disease. “There are so many that the situation has got out of control,” said Wolfgang Apel, chairman of the Bremen Animal Protection Society, which has started a petition inviting visitors to support mandatory castration. “They are becoming a burden to the public,” he told the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper. Under the mooted new law, anyone who allowed their cat to run free would be forced to pay to have it neutered. It currently costs between €130 and €150 (£113 to £131) to spay a female cat, and €100 to castrate a tomcat. Apel hopes that if the law is passed in Bremen, it will lead to nationwide legislation. In Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, Green MP Undine Kurth said the government should take responsibility for the growing problem. “It would help a lot,” said Kurth, “if the federal ministry of agriculture would initiate a debate on the wretched situation.” A number of small German towns already advocate the compulsory neutering of stray cats, including Paderborn in North Rhine-Westphalia, which was home to 40,000 stray cats before it introduced forced castration three years ago. Now, pet owners in Paderborn must tattoo their cats, or implant them with a microchip. If they are found to have abandoned their cats, they are handed a €500 fine. Germany Animal welfare Animals Europe Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Britain has confirmed a UK national died in Wednesday’s bombing of a Jerusalem bus stop. Meanwhile, Israeli aircraft struck targets in the Gaza Strip on Thursday in response to rocket and mortar fire from Gaza. (March 24)
Continue reading …Actresses Anne Hathaway, Courteney Cox, Hayden Panettiere, Vanessa Hudgens, Neve Campbell and Abbie Cornish react to the sad passing of Hollywood icon Elizabeth Taylor. (March 24)
Continue reading …Stars across the world react to Elizabeth Taylor’s death; Lindsay Lohan rejects judge’s plea offer in theft case; Lady Gaga speaks out about Malaysia lyric censorship. (March 24)
Continue reading …A truck tangles with a car on a freeway overpass in Fort Worth, Texas, sending the truck partly off the bridge. It took a crane to get the tanker off the sidewall of the overpass. Two people were rescued from the crumpled car. (March 24)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media There was this letter. A letter purportedly written by an Arizona substitute teacher complaining about the Hispanics in his classroom. The entire text of that letter is on David’s earlier post . There are things that bother me about that letter. Like this: I am compelled to write to you about a recent event that occurred to me . This person was substitute-teaching a language arts class. Really? And this: The teacher’s instructions were for the students to read a few pages and answer the questions regarding Mark Twain in their history textbook and to finish their final drafts to Senator Steve Gallardo thanking him for his position on Illegal Immigration rights. I did find a textbook used in Arizona that has a section on a Mark Twain short story, but didn’t find any related material in the Social Studies textbook. But really? Would a teacher of 8th grade Hispanic kids assign a paper thanking Steve Gallardo for his position on immigration rights? Presumably it isn’t “illegal immigration rights”, since the last time I looked there’s no right to illegal immigration. By the way, that “position” was to argue for the withdrawal of Pearce’s anti-immigration legislation because of the detrimental impact it would have on Arizona. This “substitute” goes on to say he provided paper and pencils to the students. Unless Arizona schools are much different than other public schools, this surprises me. By 8th grade, students are expected to be responsible for bringing their own paper and pencils to class. But here’s where my eyebrows go even higher than Megyn Kelly’s: The students’ final drafts that I read were basically the same. Most of them stated they were in the country illegally, White Americans are racist, and that they came here for a better life. I asked the class if America adopted Mexico immigration laws would Americans still be consider racist? It is unusual, to say the least, for any student to state in writing that they’re in this country illegally. But for “most of the students” to say so is nothing short of amazing. My radar was going off so loudly it could be heard on Mars, I’m sure. For the sake of argument, let’s assume it was written by a Tea Party member and sent to King Racist, Russell Pearce. And let’s assume for the sake of argument that he read it and said, “Hot damn, this is exactly what we need to read on the floor of the Senate!” Is it coincidence that it was read right after Pearce’s anti-immigration racist teabagging immigration bills were withdrawn from consideration by Arizona’s legislature? Could it be that someone thought writing a letter like this might re-stir the controversy? Well, if Senator Laurie Klein is to be believed, it doesn’t really matter whether it’s true or not. Megyn Kelly sets this up by claiming Democrats are demanding an apology for reading such a racist letter in the floor of the Senate. Klein’s response? There’s no apology necessary . Unfortunately today in our classrooms here in Arizona, California — I’ve had letters from all over the country as well as other teachers here in Arizona applauding that I had the courage to read the letter. Because we do have a problem. We’re educating and spending millions of dollars in our state, and if this is where our money is going our taxpayers have a right to know that this kind of behavior which is not acceptable from any race is happening in our schools. Keep in mind, the discussion is taking place as though this letter has been authenticated and verified, so up to now, no mention of the possibility that it’s anything other than genuine. Now as it happens, Klein is also advocating for a bill that would call for identification and “counting” of illegal immigrants, because (concerned face) “taxpayers deserve to know.” How convenient. Finally, Megyn gets around to the possibility the letter is a fake. KELLY: There are questions about whether this guy, Tony Hill, who claims to be the substitute teacher, exists. Now some are raising questions about it. This local news agency called five school districts in Glendale — that’s where he claimed he was from — and all five said he never taught here, he’s never been a substitute teacher here at all. And he also said — he made claims about the students not wanting to read Mark Twain and the school district says we don’t even have the kids read Mark Twain in 8th grade. So, what are your thoughts on that? KLEIN: Well, the gentleman does exist, he’s spoken with our Senate President [Russell Pearce]. He is a substitute teacher, he’s on record as such, he’s married to a Hispanic, by the way, so he’s not a racist. But he identified a problem that we face. We have an organization here called La Raza which is a far leftist racist organization that is inciting young Hispanics to act out, not say the Pledge, spit on America and say it’s our right to take America back. And this is really creating a problem here. KELLY: Just so our viewers know, those are some of the allegations that Mr. Hill raised in this letter — that they won’t say the pledge, that they say we’re Mexicans and Americans stole our land, that they say that they’re in the country illegally, Americans are racists and so on. The things you just listed are in this letter. So, to review. The only person who knows this Tony Hill is Russell Pearce, who is a known racist xenophobe who has an agenda aimed at Hispanics, legal or otherwise. And this Tony Hill just happens to report 8th graders behaving in a way which exactly dovetails with efforts to pass legislation to identify and count illegal immigrants in Arizona schools so taxpayers can “know.” Oh, and this Tony Hill is married to a Hispanic so he’s for sure not racist. As it turns out, the Glendale School District has now confirmed a substitute teacher by the name of Anthony Hill, but they’re not quite as quick to confirm other “facts” as stated in his letter. It seems that Mr. Hill was hired via a private service which the district uses when their contract substitutes are unavailable or assignments exceed the available number of substitute teachers. The district records show Hill worked as a substitute at three different schools, but only two were with eighth graders: on March 9, when he substituted for an art teacher at Challenger Middle School, and on March 8, when he substituted for an eighth-grade reading, writing and social studies teacher at Harold W. Smith Elementary School. The district interviewed students and the teacher at Harold W. Smith Elementary School. “The district believes that the statements made by Mr. Hill in regard to our students and school were not accurate,” according to the release. “Students who were interviewed did not recall making or hearing any of the inflammatory statements attributed to them by Mr. Hill, and students also said they stood for the daily recital of the Pledge of Allegiance.” Mr. Hill has substituted on nine days for that school district. I would like to recommend that he not be called to substitute for any more, not only because of his xenophobic views, but because anyone with such miserable spelling and grammar needs to take an 8th grade class rather than teach one.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media There was this letter. A letter purportedly written by an Arizona substitute teacher complaining about the Hispanics in his classroom. The entire text of that letter is on David’s earlier post . There are things that bother me about that letter. Like this: I am compelled to write to you about a recent event that occurred to me . This person was substitute-teaching a language arts class. Really? And this: The teacher’s instructions were for the students to read a few pages and answer the questions regarding Mark Twain in their history textbook and to finish their final drafts to Senator Steve Gallardo thanking him for his position on Illegal Immigration rights. I did find a textbook used in Arizona that has a section on a Mark Twain short story, but didn’t find any related material in the Social Studies textbook. But really? Would a teacher of 8th grade Hispanic kids assign a paper thanking Steve Gallardo for his position on immigration rights? Presumably it isn’t “illegal immigration rights”, since the last time I looked there’s no right to illegal immigration. By the way, that “position” was to argue for the withdrawal of Pearce’s anti-immigration legislation because of the detrimental impact it would have on Arizona. This “substitute” goes on to say he provided paper and pencils to the students. Unless Arizona schools are much different than other public schools, this surprises me. By 8th grade, students are expected to be responsible for bringing their own paper and pencils to class. But here’s where my eyebrows go even higher than Megyn Kelly’s: The students’ final drafts that I read were basically the same. Most of them stated they were in the country illegally, White Americans are racist, and that they came here for a better life. I asked the class if America adopted Mexico immigration laws would Americans still be consider racist? It is unusual, to say the least, for any student to state in writing that they’re in this country illegally. But for “most of the students” to say so is nothing short of amazing. My radar was going off so loudly it could be heard on Mars, I’m sure. For the sake of argument, let’s assume it was written by a Tea Party member and sent to King Racist, Russell Pearce. And let’s assume for the sake of argument that he read it and said, “Hot damn, this is exactly what we need to read on the floor of the Senate!” Is it coincidence that it was read right after Pearce’s anti-immigration racist teabagging immigration bills were withdrawn from consideration by Arizona’s legislature? Could it be that someone thought writing a letter like this might re-stir the controversy? Well, if Senator Laurie Klein is to be believed, it doesn’t really matter whether it’s true or not. Megyn Kelly sets this up by claiming Democrats are demanding an apology for reading such a racist letter in the floor of the Senate. Klein’s response? There’s no apology necessary . Unfortunately today in our classrooms here in Arizona, California — I’ve had letters from all over the country as well as other teachers here in Arizona applauding that I had the courage to read the letter. Because we do have a problem. We’re educating and spending millions of dollars in our state, and if this is where our money is going our taxpayers have a right to know that this kind of behavior which is not acceptable from any race is happening in our schools. Keep in mind, the discussion is taking place as though this letter has been authenticated and verified, so up to now, no mention of the possibility that it’s anything other than genuine. Now as it happens, Klein is also advocating for a bill that would call for identification and “counting” of illegal immigrants, because (concerned face) “taxpayers deserve to know.” How convenient. Finally, Megyn gets around to the possibility the letter is a fake. KELLY: There are questions about whether this guy, Tony Hill, who claims to be the substitute teacher, exists. Now some are raising questions about it. This local news agency called five school districts in Glendale — that’s where he claimed he was from — and all five said he never taught here, he’s never been a substitute teacher here at all. And he also said — he made claims about the students not wanting to read Mark Twain and the school district says we don’t even have the kids read Mark Twain in 8th grade. So, what are your thoughts on that? KLEIN: Well, the gentleman does exist, he’s spoken with our Senate President [Russell Pearce]. He is a substitute teacher, he’s on record as such, he’s married to a Hispanic, by the way, so he’s not a racist. But he identified a problem that we face. We have an organization here called La Raza which is a far leftist racist organization that is inciting young Hispanics to act out, not say the Pledge, spit on America and say it’s our right to take America back. And this is really creating a problem here. KELLY: Just so our viewers know, those are some of the allegations that Mr. Hill raised in this letter — that they won’t say the pledge, that they say we’re Mexicans and Americans stole our land, that they say that they’re in the country illegally, Americans are racists and so on. The things you just listed are in this letter. So, to review. The only person who knows this Tony Hill is Russell Pearce, who is a known racist xenophobe who has an agenda aimed at Hispanics, legal or otherwise. And this Tony Hill just happens to report 8th graders behaving in a way which exactly dovetails with efforts to pass legislation to identify and count illegal immigrants in Arizona schools so taxpayers can “know.” Oh, and this Tony Hill is married to a Hispanic so he’s for sure not racist. As it turns out, the Glendale School District has now confirmed a substitute teacher by the name of Anthony Hill, but they’re not quite as quick to confirm other “facts” as stated in his letter. It seems that Mr. Hill was hired via a private service which the district uses when their contract substitutes are unavailable or assignments exceed the available number of substitute teachers. The district records show Hill worked as a substitute at three different schools, but only two were with eighth graders: on March 9, when he substituted for an art teacher at Challenger Middle School, and on March 8, when he substituted for an eighth-grade reading, writing and social studies teacher at Harold W. Smith Elementary School. The district interviewed students and the teacher at Harold W. Smith Elementary School. “The district believes that the statements made by Mr. Hill in regard to our students and school were not accurate,” according to the release. “Students who were interviewed did not recall making or hearing any of the inflammatory statements attributed to them by Mr. Hill, and students also said they stood for the daily recital of the Pledge of Allegiance.” Mr. Hill has substituted on nine days for that school district. I would like to recommend that he not be called to substitute for any more, not only because of his xenophobic views, but because anyone with such miserable spelling and grammar needs to take an 8th grade class rather than teach one.
Continue reading …Somewhere the ghost of George Orwell cringes in recognition. In her eagerness to please, Rachel Maddow occasionally collides headlong into immutable facts of economic reality. To wit, cutting taxes does not constitute new government spending, at least outside of doctrinaire Marxist analysis. Here's MSNBC's Little Miss Sunshine giving her two-cents' worth on this Tuesday night (video below page break) — Anybody who reports that Republican governors and legislatures are taking drastic measures to close their states' budget gaps is not reporting this truthfully. In New Jersey, where the governor's cuts to education from last year were just ruled unconstitutional today, in New Jersey the justification for those cuts was of course that New Jersey's broke, right? What does Gov. Christie want to do to fix that problem of New Jersey being broke? He wants the state to spend $200 million a year that it is not spending already to cut taxes on estates and corporations. Maddow criticizes unspecified reporting in the media as not being done “truthfully” — followed by her engaging in the same practice she condemns. Operative sentence here — “He wants the state to spend $200 million a year that it is not spending already to cut taxes on estates and corporations.” I'm reminded of Orwell's observation in his essay “Politics and the English Language,” written in 1946, that “in our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible. … Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness.” Maddow achieves an Orwellian trifecta here – euphemism (tax cuts as new spending), question-begging (“that it is not spending already …”?) and sheer cloudy vagueness (as evident by Maddow stumbling over the gratuitous “that is is not spending already”). Maddow's claim, streamlined to its dishonest essence — He wants the state to spend $200 million a year to cut taxes on estates and corporations. Absent its intentionally vague qualifier, the sentence collapses under its own contradiction. More accurately, Christie wants to prevent the state from spending $200 million a year by keeping the money from being collected as taxes to begin with. The only way Maddow's claim makes sense would be if Christie wanted to cut $200 million in taxes annually while maintaining the same level of state spending. But this clearly isn't the case, as shown by Maddow pointing out that Christie cut education spending last year. By doing this, and other measures as well, Christie deprives liberals like Maddow of criticizing him for tax cuts that aren't “paid for.” What do they do in response? Label tax cuts as new spending, since the notion of shrinking bloated government programs or eliminating them altogether is unthinkable to left wingers. In fact, the source cited here by Maddow, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, states this in the same excerpt cited by Maddow — At the same time, the governor has proposed substantial pay decreases for state employees, applied for a waiver from federal Medicaid rules that would likely reduce significantly the number of people with access to the program, and other spending cuts.
Continue reading …