Tension mounts over military action as Ankara accuses Sarkozy of pursuing French interests over liberation of Libyan people Turkey has launched a bitter attack on French president Nicolas Sarkozy’s and France’s leadership of the military campaign against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, accusing the French of lacking a conscience in their conduct in the Libyan operations. The vitriolic criticism, from both the prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the president, Abdullah Gül followed attacks from the Turkish government earlier this week and signalled an orchestrated attempt by Ankara to wreck Sarkozy’s plans to lead the air campaign against Gaddafi. With France insisting that Nato should not be put in political charge of the UN-mandated air campaign, Turkey has come out emphatically behind sole Nato control of the operations. The row came as France confirmed that one of its fighter jets had destroyed a Libyan air force plane just after it landed at the Misrata base. This was the first time the no-fly zone had been breached by pro-Gaddafi forces. The clash between Turkey and France over Libya is underpinned by acute frictions between Erdogan and Sarkozy, both impetuous and mercurial leaders who revel in the limelight, by fundamental disputes over Ankara’s EU ambitions, and by economic interests in north Africa. The confrontation is shaping up to be decisive in determining the outcome of the bitter infighting over who should inherit command of the Libyan air campaign from the Americans and could come to a head at a major conference in London next week of the parties involved. Using incendiary language directed at France in a speech in Istanbul, Erdogan said: “I wish that those who only see oil, gold mines and underground treasures when they look in [Libya's] direction, would see the region through glasses of conscience from now on.” President Gül reinforced the Turkish view that France and others were being driven primarily by economic interests. “The aim [of the air campaign] is not the liberation of the Libyan people,” he said. “There are hidden agendas and different interests.” Earlier this week, Claude Guéant, the French interior minister who was previously Sarkozy’s chief adviser, outraged the Muslim world by stating that the French president was “leading a crusade” to stop Gaddafi massacring Libyans. Erdogan denounced the use of the word crusade yesterday, blaming those, France chief among them, who are opposed to Turkey joining the EU. Senior Nato officials are meeting in Brussels for the fourth day in a row to try to hammer out an agreement on who should assume command of the no-fly zone over Libya from the Americans who are determined to relinquish command within days. Sarkozy has agreed to give Nato military planners operational command of the campaign, but refused to grant the alliance political and strategic control, insisting this should be vested in the broader “coalition of the willing” taking part. Turkey has responded by blocking Nato planning operations for Libya while stressing that Nato should be given “sole command”, senior Nato diplomats said. Turkey, Nato’s second biggest army after the US and its only Muslim member, appears bent on winning the argument. It is already taking part in Nato patrols in the Mediterranean to police an arms embargo on Libya. It wants to limit and shorten the air campaign and proscribe ground attacks on Libya by Nato aircraft. If Nato is given political command of the air effort, Turkey would be able to exercise a veto in a system run on consensus. The US’s top military officer in Europe, Admiral James Stavridis, Nato’s supreme commander Europe, has gone to Ankara to try to mediate a deal. The Turks are incensed at repeated snubs by Sarkozy. The French failed to invite Turkey to last Saturday’s summit in Paris which presaged the air strikes. French fighters taking off from Corsica struck the first blows. The Turkish government accused Sarkozy of launching not only the no-fly zone, but his presidential re-election campaign. While the dispute over Libya is substantive and political, it also appears highly personal, revealing the bad blood simmering between the French president and the Turkish prime minister. Sarkozy went to Turkey last month for the first time in four years as president. But the visit was repeatedly delayed and then downgraded from a state presidential event. He stayed in Turkey for five hours. “Relations between Turkey and France deserve more than this,” complained Erdogan. “I will speak with frankness. We wish to host him as president of France. But he is coming as president of the G20, not as that of France.” While the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is also opposed to Turkey joining the EU, she has voiced her objections moderately. Sarkozy has declared loudly that culturally Turkey does not belong in Europe, but in the Middle East. France has blocked tranches of Ankara’s EU negotiations on the grounds that it should not be seen as ever-fit for membership. Arab and Middle East unrest Turkey Nicolas Sarkozy Nato Libya Muammar Gaddafi European Union Middle East France Europe Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …AT&T is keeping up its wheeling and dealing this week, signing an agreement with Ford to provide the built-in wireless connectivity for its upcoming Focus Electric hatchback. The deal’s pretty simple, really. Ford has put together a comprehensive MyFord Mobile application to go with its EV, which will allow you to keep track of and schedule charging, while also serving up status notifications, range information, and nearby recharging stations’ locations, the latter facility being provided with the help of MapQuest . All that data exchange will need a nice dumb pipe to carry it between the Focus and your smartphone and AT&T is obligingly fulfilling that role — and don’t worry if your phone doesn’t support the app (works with Android, BlackBerry and iOS), Ford’s got a web interface too. Full PR after the break. Continue reading Ford Focus Electric hooks up wirelessly with AT&T, incurs jealous looks from T-Mobile Ford Focus Electric hooks up wirelessly with AT&T, incurs jealous looks from T-Mobile originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Elizabeth Taylor: Burial Near Marilyn Monroe at… | Gather Christina Hendricks Joins ‘Company ‘, So Does Jon Cryer · Charlie Sheen Not Wanted Back on ‘Two and a Half Men’, Stands “No Chance” · Robert Pattinson gives ‘Breaking Dawn’ birth scene details … Sprint–T-Mobile, AT&T, Your Merger Stinks! | Gather Christina Hendricks Joins ‘Company ‘, So Does Jon Cryer · Justin Bieber’s Hair Styling Secret: $220 Hair Dryer · ‘Smallville’ spoilers: Laura Vandervoort’s return as Kara/Supergirl. less. Howard Stern Sues Sirius XM for Reneging on Stock … Earn BJ's Gift Cards Or Other Prizes With BJ's… | Gather Christina Hendricks Joins ‘Company ‘, So Does Jon Cryer · Justin Bieber’s Hair Styling Secret: $220 Hair Dryer · Robert Pattinson gives ‘Breaking Dawn’ birth scene details. less. Howard Stern Sues Sirius XM for Reneging on Stock … My internet was down for 4 days. | Gather Christina Hendricks Joins ‘Company ‘, So Does Jon Cryer · Justin Bieber’s Hair Styling Secret: $220 Hair Dryer · Robert Pattinson gives ‘Breaking Dawn’ birth scene details. less. Howard Stern Sues Sirius XM for Reneging on Stock … ceonewsinfo says: Christina Hendricks Joins 'Company', So Does Jon Cryer http://dlvr.it/LCLtv
Continue reading …Type: eBooks Title: Common as Air: Revolution, Art, and Ownership See all customer reviews Product Description: Common as Air offers a stirring defense of our cultural commons, that vast store of art and ideas we have inherited from the past that continues to enrich our present. Suspicious of the current idea that all creative work is “intellectual property,” Lewis Hyde turns to America’s founding fathers—men like John Adams, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson—in search of other ways to value the fruits of human wit and imagination. What he discovers is a rich tradition in which knowledge was assumed to be a commonwealth, not a private preserve. For the founding fathers, democratic self-governance itself demanded open and easy access to ideas. So did the growth of creative communities, such as that of eighteenth-century science. And so did the flourishing of public persons, the very actors whose “civic virtue” brought the nation into being. In this lively, carefully argued, and well-documented book, Hyde brings the past to bear on present matters, shedding fresh light on everything from the Human Genome Project to Bob Dylan’s musical roots. Common as Air allows us to stand on the shoulders of America’s revolutionary giants and to see beyond today’s narrow debates over cultural ownership. What it reveals is nothing less than an inspiring vision of how to reclaim the commonwealth of art and ideas that we were meant to inherit. See the details
Continue reading …Love—or lust—was in the air, and we failed to take action, or took the wrong action. That’s the biggest regret of our lives, according to a recent study. Nearly one of five survey respondents named a lost love connection as the one thing in their lives they regretted…
Continue reading …Students from Ishinomaki School graduate after their city in the Miyagi Prefecture was devastated by a tsunami, triggered by a massive earthquake that hit Japan almost two weeks ago. (March 24)
Continue reading …Students from Ishinomaki School graduate after their city in the Miyagi Prefecture was devastated by a tsunami, triggered by a massive earthquake that hit Japan almost two weeks ago. (March 24)
Continue reading …Rescuers have returned a stranded baby porpoise to the sea after it was found splashing in rice paddy more than a mile inland. (March 24)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Glenn Beck has done lots of mainstreaming extremist beliefs and ideas in his two-plus years at Fox News — especially far-right ideas that have circulated for years among Patriot-movement militiamen and John Birch Society members, from various “New World Order” theories and claims to “Tenther” theories to his abortive flirtation with FEMA concentration-camp theories . Judging from the hints he’s been dropping on his Fox News show all this week, on Friday he’s going to once again dive into the deep, dark and murky waters of classic far-right conspiracism of the Bircher kind. He dropped hints the other day while discussing the “Liberty Dollar” scamsters — claiming, on the one hand, that he knew ahead of time that what these characters were doing was breaking the law, but simultaneously, they were telling the truth when it came to the evil Federal Reserve. BECK: Well, this guy was misguided, but he wasn’t trying to bring down the United States — at least, from what he told me. He believed the Fed was destroying the dollar — and, really? That’s a hard stretch, isn’t it? You, by the way, have to watch this show on Friday — because there is some truth to that. The unbelievable history of the Fed. The, uh — what is it, the uh, ‘Monster,’ is that what it was called? The Monster? The Creature of Jekyll Island. We will give you the truth and none of the crazy conspiracy theories on the Fed on Friday. Anyway. Beck is referencing one of the widest-read conspiracist works about the Federal Reserve, G. Edward Griffin’s The Creature from Jekyll Island , and it appears — vows to eschew conspiracy theories notwithstanding — that he intends to cite it as a credible source, much as he did with Jonah Goldberg’s fraudulent Liberal Fascism thesis in his “documentary” exposing the nefarious fascist roots of modern progressivism. In that case, he promised to eschew “conspiracy theories” too. Beck, as we all know, has previously demonstrated a fondness for the Birch Society, and this is consistent with that: Griffin, after all, was a close personal friend and longtime associate of Birch Society founder Robert Welch, and wrote a popular Birch book published in 1964, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations. The Creature from Jekyll Island is in many ways a compendium of previous works claiming that the Federal Reserve is a fundamentally illegitimate — and therefore deeply nefarious — organization. Most of these theories were deeply anti-Semitic in nature, since they depicted the Fed’s bankers as part of a Jewish cabal intent on destroying white American society. What sets Griffin’s work apart is that — like most Birch texts, which assiduously avoided anti-Semitism — he manages to scrub out the anti-Semitic elements while keeping the paranoid conspiracist elements intact. Since its publication in 1994, Griffin’s book has become a popular text for a large number of right-wing extremists, particularly tax protesters and Patriot movement believers. Griffin himself was involved in organizing a gathering on Jekyll Island last year that the Southern Poverty Law Center credits with helping revive the militia movement . It has been debunked thoroughly, of course — probably most notably by historian Gerry Rough, whose three-part series on the origins of the Fed, “Another Twist on the Jacksonian Bank War,” pretty thoroughly reveal just how fraudulent Griffin’s text really is. You can read it here: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3. Another terrific debunking of far-right Federal Reserve theories generally, including Griffin’s texts, was provided by Edward Flaherty at Public Eye. From the first part : The problem with the Aldrich Plan was that the regional banks would be controlled individually and nationally by bankers, a prospect that did not sit well with the populist Democratic party or with Wilson. As the debate began to take shape in the spring of 1913, Congressman Arsene Pujo provided good evidence that the nation’s credit markets were under the tight control of a handful of banks – the “money trusts” against which Wilson warned.1 Wilson and the Democrats wanted a reform measure which would decentralize control away from the money trusts. The legislation that eventually emerged was the Federal Reserve Act, also known at the time as the Currency Bill, or the Owen-Glass Act. The bill called for a system of eight to twelve mostly autonomous regional Reserve Banks that would be owned by the banks in their region and whose actions would be coordinated by a Federal Reserve Board appointed by the President. The Board’s members originally included the Secretary of the Treasury, the Comptroller of the Currency, and other officials appointed by the President to represent public interests. The proposed Federal Reserve System would therefore be privately owned, but publicly controlled. Wilson signed the bill on December 23, 1913 and the Federal Reserve System was born.6 Conspiracy theorists have long viewed the Federal Reserve Act as a means of giving control of the banking system to the money trusts, when in reality the intent and effect was to wrestle control away from them. History clearly demonstrates that in the decades prior to the Federal Reserve Act the decisions of a few large New York banks had, at times, enormous repercussions for banks throughout the country and the economy in general. Following the return to central banking, at least some measure of control was removed from them and placed with the Federal Reserve. It is true that the Fed was a progressive institution at the outset. And doing away with it and returning control of the banking system to the banks would be the opposite of progressive. Moreover, ending the Fed is really more about the larger far-right enterprise of gutting the power of the federal government on a number of fronts: taxes, regulating the financial sector, civil-rights laws, public education, the environment. It will be interesting to watch Friday and see just how deeply into this morass Glenn Beck dives. Given his track record, it likely will be a headfirst plunge.
Continue reading …