Each week our friends at Inhabitat recap the week’s most interesting green developments and clean tech news for us — it’s the Week in Green. Building technology got a tremendous boost this week as Inhabitat reported on a new type of graphene super paper that is 10 times stronger than steel and six times as light. We also took a look at several remarkable new infrastructure projects popping up around the world – from a self-sufficient floating golf course in the Maldives to London’s gleaming new cable car system , to the Netherlands’ plan to supercharge its roadways with solar panels . Speaking of hot asphalt, this week the ultra-efficient Alerion race car blazed a trail at the Shell Eco-Marathon, clocking in an incredible 2,564.8 miles per gallon. Meanwhile, Fisker announced that its sexy electric Karma sedan will hit the road this summer, and we were surprised to hear that Marcelo da Luz was forced to pull his solar-powered X of 1 car across Ontario due to road regulations. The New York Auto Show also kicked off with a blast this week as Lexus unveiled its next-gen LF-Gh concept hybrid and Porsche rolled out a 911 GTR 3 in a Facebook colorway that got a lot of “likes”. Finally, we looked at several futuristic example of wearable technology this week including a pair of RoboCop-like glasses that are capable of scanning 400 faces per second at public events. We also brought you a brilliant LED backpack that lets cyclists send signals to drivers, a pollution-detecting t-shirt , and a clock that tells time by knitting a new scarf every year . Inhabitat’s Week in Green: solar panel roads, floating golf, and the 2,564.8 MPG race car originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:30:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Lindsey Graham has a solution for the stalemate in Libya: “My recommendation to NATO and to the administration is to cut the head of the snake off, go to Tripoli, start bombing Gadhafi’s inner circle, their compounds their military headquarters in Tripoli,” he told State of the Union today. Coalition…
Continue reading …Sometimes, you don’t know when to throw in the towel. As time passes, it becomes clear that things aren’t working out as you planned. You realize that pursuing whatever it is that you’re pursuing, whether it’s being successful in your current career, mending a troubled relationship or renovating your house from top to bottom, will cost you too much financially or emotionally, or take too long. But instead of moving on to new opportunities, all too often you simply stay the course and sacrifice your own well-being in the process. You aren’t alone. Most of us know what it’s like to stay in a job or a relationship long after it has ceased being satisfying, or to take on a project that’s just too big for us and be reluctant to admit it. CEOs have been known to allocate manpower and money to projects long after it’s become clear that they are obviously failing, digging a deeper hole rather than trying to climb their way out of it. (Remember how long it took to get rid of New Coke?) The costs to the person who can’t see reason, in terms of time, effort and lost opportunities for happiness, can be enormous. We recognize this kind of foolishness immediately in others, but that doesn’t stop us from making the same mistake ourselves. Why? There are several powerful and largely unconscious psychological forces at work here. We may throw good money after bad ideas, or waste time in a dead-end relationship, because we haven’t come up with an alternative, or because we don’t want to admit to our friends and family, or to ourselves, that we were wrong. But the most likely culprit is our overwhelming aversion to sunk costs. Sunk costs are the resources that you’ve put into an endeavor that you can’t get back out. They are the years you spent training for a profession you hate or waiting for your commitment-phobic boyfriend to propose. They are the money you spent on redecorating your living room in the hot new style, only to find that you hate living in it. Once you’ve realized that you probably won’t succeed or that you are unhappy with the results, it shouldn’t matter how much time and effort you’ve already put into something. If your job or your boyfriend have taken up some of the best years of your life, it doesn’t make sense to let them use up the years you’ve got left. And an ugly living room is an ugly living room, no matter how much money you spent making it so. The problem is that it doesn’t feel that way. Putting in a lot only to end up with nothing to show for it is just too awful for most of us to seriously consider. We worry far too much about what we’ll lose if we just move on, and not nearly enough about the costs of not moving on — more wasted time and effort, more unhappiness and more missed opportunities. So how can we make it easier to know when to cut our losses? Thanks to recent research by Northwestern University psychologists Daniel Molden and Chin Ming Hui, there is a simple and effective way to be sure you are making the best decisions when things go awry: focus on what you have to gain, rather than what you have to lose. As I’ve written about in my new book “Succeed: How We Can Reach Our Goals,” psychologists call this adopting a promotion focus. When we think about our goals in terms of potential gains, we automatically (often without realizing it) become more comfortable with making mistakes and accepting the losses we may have to incur along the way. When we adopt a prevention focus, on the other hand, and think about our goals in terms of what we could lose if we don’t succeed, we become much more sensitive to sunk costs. For example, in one of their studies, Molden and Hui put participants into either a promotion or prevention mindset by having them spend five minutes writing about their “personal hopes and aspirations” (promotion) or “duties and obligations” (prevention). They also included a control group with no manipulation of mindset. Next, each participant was asked to imagine that he or she was president of an aviation company that had committed $10 million to developing a plane that can’t be detected by radar. With the project near completion and $9 million already spent, a rival company announces the availability of their own radar-blank plane, which is both superior in performance and lower in cost. The question put to participants was simple: do you invest the remaining $1 million and finish your company’s (inferior and more expensive) plane, or cut your losses and move on? Molden and Hui found that participants who had been put in a prevention mindset (focused on avoiding loss) stayed the course and invested the remaining $1 million roughly 80 percent of the time. The control group, included to provide a sense of how people would usually respond in this situation, was virtually identical to the prevention group. This suggests that when things go wrong and sunk costs are high, most of us naturally become prevention-minded, and more likely to try to keep waging a losing battle. The odds of making that mistake were significantly reduced by adopting a promotion mindset (focused on potential gain); those participants invested the remaining $1 million less than 60 percent of the time.* When we see our goals in terms of what we can gain rather than what we might lose, we are more likely to see a doomed endeavor for what it is and try to make the most of a bad situation. It’s not difficult to achieve greater clarity if you make a deliberate effort to refocus yourself when making your decision. Stop and reflect on everything you have to gain by cutting your losses now — the opportunities for happiness and growth, the possibility for a better, more fulfilling life. If you do, you’ll find it much easier to make the right choice. *Why not a bigger drop? Good question. Remember that promotion focus was manipulated very indirectly through a totally unrelated writing task. If you adopt a promotion focus directly with respect to the decision itself, considering what you could gain by moving on from your failure, the effects should be even stronger.
Continue reading …It’s times like these that not only give Versus a bad name, but the NHL as well. As a critical playoff game was decided in double overtime in Boston, the announcer called the goal scorer’s name, then proclaimed the Canadiens had won the game and taken a 3-2 series lead. Only problem: the exact opposite happened. Nathan Horton’s dramatic goal lifted Boston to a 3-2 series lead, not Montreal. The high-profile gaffe couldn’t have happened at a more important juncture in the series, as it was knotted 2-2 and the game itself was locked 1-1. The overtime call was sure to confuse more casual fans, and for others listening, it was just downright embarrassing. Listen for yourself… The call is clearly: “And the Canadiens now lead it three games to two!” Oops. WATCH:
Continue reading …The Micro Four Thirds form factor may be a compelling choice for those seeking portability with affordable prices and notable quality, but there’s no doubt that many folks are still loyal to the conventional DSLRs. If you’re one such Olympus fan who’s concerned about the fate of the larger E-series lineup, fret not: Akira Watanabe, head of product development, reassured PCPOP that the E-series models are here to stay because of their unique features, though his team’s still pondering over the idea of replacing the budget triple-digit line (like the E-620 ) with the PEN series, as suggested by his colleague previously . But shifting the focus back to PEN, Watanabe teased that his crew’s developing some MFT lenses to boost the portfolio, though little is revealed other than that these will cater users who have specific photographic needs. Very intriguing indeed — maybe some fisheye and tilt-shift love? Olympus still loving E-series DSLRs, but teases new Micro Four Thirds lenses to confuse you originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:12:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Alitalia cabin crew restrain would-be hijacker on Paris to Rome flight with 131 passengers on board An attempt to hijack a plane to Libya was foiled on Sunday night by the cabin crew, according to the Italian airline, Alitalia. Italy’s Ansa news agency said the would-be hijacker was armed with a small knife. He was thought to be from Kazakhstan. The incident took place on a flight from Paris to Rome with 131 passengers on board. Alitalia identified it as flight AZ 329 which had taken off from Paris at 8.24pm local time. The airline said in a statement: “A passenger in an evident state of agitation assaulted a flight attendant, demanding that the flight be diverted to Tripoli. Thanks to the swift intervention of the other flight attendants the attacker was restrained in his seat and the flight continued towards Rome Fiumicino where it landed normally at 21.55.” Ansa reported that, after he was immobilised, the would-be hijacker was sedated by a doctor who was among the passengers. The crew radioed ahead to alert the police who escorted the man from the plane. Early on Monday, he was reportedly being interrogated by officers of the Italian frontier police. The flight attendant who had been seized was taken to a first aid post, but she was found not to have been seriously hurt in the incident. Italy Libya Europe John Hooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Great Fun: Katniss' mom cast in 'The Hunger Games ' Katniss’ mom cast in ‘The Hunger Games ‘. Paula Malcomson, 51, star of the TV show “Caprica,” is now cast as the mother of Katniss and Prim in the new film “The Hunger Games.” Malcomson will join two teen heartthrobs in the roles of Gale …
Continue reading …Boy, don’t you wish you lived in Vermont ? If only my state (and maybe yours) didn’t have another dirtbag Republican corporatist extremist at the helm. Maybe we could actually look at the numbers and admit it’s the only system that makes financial sense: MONTPELIER, Vt. — The Vermont Senate is expected to discuss and vote on an historic health care bill that would effectively create the path towards a single-payer system. All Vermonters would be eligible under the tax-payer funded plan . Supporters also say it will be cheaper than the current system because it is more efficient. “We estimate we can save $500 million, and that’s a conservative estimate,” said Sen. Claire Ayer. Their goal would be to have the bill on the Governor’s desk by early Ma y, but opponents want to take it much slower. They are worried that this whole process is going too fast for a bill that is too important. “We are hoping we can spread it out over a day or two,” said Republican Sen. Joe Benning. “This is probably the biggest piece of legislation to come out since the Civil War. We are talking about, not millions, but billions of dollars that are being discussed.” The total cost of the bill is still unclear since financing decisions won’t be made until 2012. That has some small businesses and corporations like IBM concerned .
Continue reading …There was no truly salient issue this past week for Daily Kos bloggers. Instead, they took on a wide range of topics from the urgent need for a federal crackdown on Rush Limbaugh and other conservative “hate-talkers” to a portrayal of America as sort of a global Grampa Simpson. Each headline is preceded by the Kossack's name or pseudonym.
Continue reading …