Home » Archives by category » News (Page 526)
Many Thanks To C&L Readers and Those Who Donated Over $8K To Our ‘Solidarity Pizzas’ For #OccupyWallStreet

enlarge Credit: Brian Malott Tina and Gordon went down to the occupy LA event on Saturday and it was overflowing with people. I want to thank all our readers and those who passed on our Solidarity Pizza action. We’re garnered over 250 donations so far from you guys and the total dollars is close to $8000 and rising. It’s amazing. It’s what makes the work that we do so fulfilling. We’ll have more soon with pictures and videos, but this is a truly grassroots movement. Pizzas went to Boston, LA, SF and New York and we’ll continue to deliver more food and drink as the days move along and as the money comes in. We’ve also gotten emails from the pizza recipients. From Occupy SF: Mr. Amato, He then delivered ~7 pizzas! in the name of crooksandliars.com . Our contingent rapidly devoured the bounty of pizza-y-goodness and walked around the square to round up any other contingents and inform them of the feast. Approximately thirty minutes later the main group had arrived and we distributed the pizza to everyone involved (with a plug that it was from you). No stomach was left behind and no pizza slice was left in a box. You guys rock, and thank you for your support. I added your website to the bottom of my sign in gratitude and displayed it all day. What you’re doing here in informing the populace of the current state of affairs is epic – keep it up. It’s our readers that rock. Another email from Occupy SF: To the fine folks of Crooks & Liars, Just wanted to thank you for the pizza’s you supplied for the assembly today at Union Square. Not only does it mean a lot that you’re supporting the movement… My wife is hypoglycemic and in the final stages of pregnancy. Just as her blood sugar was acting up, and she was starting feeling sick, the pizza’s arrived and saved the day. Blessings, K I’ve been so busy that I haven’t been able to get through all my emails or FB comments, but that’s only a sample. Tina’s work has been extraordinary and she deserves major props for doing most of the hard parts. She’s called in orders to: I’ve called all these places and they have no problems getting the food to the protesters: Al Capone’s in Boston: (617) 426-1800 Escape from New York Pizza in San Francisco (415) 421-0700 Liberatos Pizza in New York: (212) 344-3464 Rocket Pizza in LA: (213) 687-4992 I’ve been thinking about how the protesters are organizing and of course my control issues kick into play. There will be some out of control stuff, but that’s the way it begins. And It’s under way without a network like Fox News behind it – it will keep evolving. enlarge Credit: Joshua Holland With Love, C&L Digby has an good post up about the nascent movement: The New York Times did a halfway decent article today on Occupy Wall Street, refuting some of the images that seem to bother people so much: For all the bedraggled look of the mattress-and-sleeping-bag-strewn camp, it has a structure and routine. A food station occupies the center of the park, where donated meals are disbursed, especially pizza and Popeyes chicken. Sympathizers from other states have been calling local shops and pizza parlors and, using their credit cards, ordering food to be delivered to the park. There are information stations, a recycling center, a media center where a gasoline generator powers computers. At the east end sits the library, labeled cardboard boxes brimming with donated books: nonfiction, fiction, poetry, legal. There is a lost and found. A medical station was outfitted with bins holding a broad array of remedies: cough drops, Maalox Maximum Strength, Clorox wipes, bee pollen granules. The main issues have been blisters, including some from handcuffs, and abrasions. There are also a few therapists. Some out-of-work protesters are depressed. They need someone’s ear. Elsewhere is a sanitation station, with designated sanitation workers who sweep the park. The park is without toilets, a problem that many of the protesters address by visiting a nearby McDonald’s. The encampment even has a post-office box, established at a U.P.S. store, and has been receiving a steady flow of supportive letters and packages. Someone from Texas sent a bunch of red bandanas, now draped on the necks of demonstrators. Others have sent camera batteries, granola bars and toothbrushes. They still exhibited an air of anthropologists observing some lost civilization, but it was at least less condescending than their last foray into the wilds of Zuccotti Park. And after tweeting a very provocative note last week about how much this reminded him of Tahrir Square, Nick Kristoff just wrote about it on the op-ed page: “Occupy Wall Street” was initially treated as a joke, but after a couple of weeks it’s gaining traction. The crowds are still tiny by protest standards — mostly in the hundreds, swelling during periodic marches — but similar occupations are bubbling up in Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Washington. David Paterson, the former New York governor, dropped by, and labor unions are lending increasing support. I tweeted that the protest reminded me a bit of Tahrir Square in Cairo, and that raised eyebrows. True, no bullets are whizzing around, and the movement won’t unseat any dictators. But there is the same cohort of alienated young people, and the same savvy use of Twitter and other social media to recruit more participants. Most of all, there’s a similar tide of youthful frustration with a political and economic system that protesters regard as broken, corrupt, unresponsive and unaccountable. “This was absolutely inspired by Tahrir Square, by the Arab Spring movement,” said Tyler Combelic, 27, a Web designer from Brooklyn who is a spokesman for the occupiers. “Enough is enough!” The protesters are dazzling in their Internet skills, and impressive in their organization. The square is divided into a reception area, a media zone, a medical clinic, a library and a cafeteria. The protesters’ Web site includes links allowing supporters anywhere in the world to go online and order pizzas (vegan preferred) from a local pizzeria that delivers them to the square. In a tribute to the ingenuity of capitalism, the pizzeria quickly added a new item to its menu: the “OccuPie special.” He has a few recommendations for “demands” that sound useful, although I’m not sure this is really about specifics at this point so much as it is consciousness raising. In any case, a ton of good stuff has been written about this in the past week. Matt Stoller had a fine article earlier at Naked Capitalism that rings true. And this new article by Micah Sifry seems completely on point to me: [S]omething is happening here, Mr. Jones. The protest, or occupation, is now in its third week, and in addition to a steadily increasing level of media coverage, this coming Wednesday a range of local unions and progressive groups are planning to rally their members to join in. Stubborn resilience plus some outraged media attention to police brutality seems to have been enough to light the spark, but beneath that, credit must go to the horizontal adhocracy running the occupation downtown, which has developed its own infrastructure for internal and external communication and social support. And it’s doing this without obvious leaders (who could be arrested and held to suppress the movement) or institutional backers (who could be pressured), and with a wide array of networked support that is being marshaled via Internet Relay Chat, blogs, Facebook pages, Twitter, livestreaming, online video and street theatre. Some highlights: The original call to action from Adbusters; The “Global Revolution” Livestream feed, which has several thousand watching at any given time, even when it isn’t bringing live video from downtown, showing short clips from Anonymous, George Carlin and other troublemakers (132,000 likes as of October 1); The “We are the 99 Percent” Tumblr collection of autobiographical photos from people facing all kinds of economic hardship, which seems to have a lot of stories from the families of American war veterans… The Occupy Together news hub, which is curating links to Occupy efforts in more than 100 cities across the US, plus two dozen overseas, as of this writing. This movement is messy and its decision-making process is participatory in the extreme, which some people adore (because it makes room for all to have a say, compared to our elite- and money-driven political system) and others abhor (because ordinary working people typically can’t devote the time to long meetings and “structure-less” decision-making usually empowers a few people in unaccountable ways). And while we know how to use networks to develop and support “stop” energy, it’s much harder to develop and enact “do” energy around specific demands… But I think it’s time to recognize that we’re no longer in a what veteran activist Myles Horton would have called an organizational phase of political activity, where meetings have walls around them, messages have managers, advocacy is centrally paid for and done by professional lobbyists, marches have beginnings and endings, and the story line goes neatly gives from petition to legislation to reform. Instead, in America we’re now entering into a third wave of movement politics (the first being the rise of the “netroots” within the Democratic party after its leadership collapse between 2000-2003; and the second being the rise of the Tea Party after the conservative losses of 2006 and 2008). I don’t pretend to know where the “Occupy” movement is going to go, though its main purpose appears to be to show first of all that it is here to stay, and to force a different perspective into a national discourse that up until now has marginalized and ignored grassroots anti-corporate social justice advocacy. Like Sifry, I don’t know where this is going. But it’s traveling at light speed — I haven’t seen anything like it online since I started blogging. (I’m fairly tuned in whether I like it or not, as you might imagine, and this is different.) So, I’m inclined to give it some room to breathe, let go of my preconceived notions of “what has to happen” and see if the new media and communications take us in the direction we need to go. Regardless of the outcome, I think this shows that people are reaching a point where they have to do something. And that’s healthy.

Continue reading …
LitReactor Is a New Writer Website With Online Classes, Workshops, Content. Is It Worth The Money?

Writing can be a lonely task. It can be tricky to motivate yourself, and without proper feedback, it’s hard to know how to improve. Several websites already exist to encourage writers, through classes, workshops, online forums and more. Tomorrow, a new site called LitReactor adds its name to the list. Created by the team who built Chuck Palahniuk’s website, which itself has hosted writing classes and more, LitReactor uses a combination of engaging content and smart gaming mechanics to encourage writers to gain both new skills and new trusted friends. LitReactor’s intended audience, according to co-founders Kirk Clawes and Dennis Widmyer, is people “aged 24 and up, and a 50-50 gender split, [whereas] the audience of most writing websites is 55 and up, often women.” The Huffington Post was granted an exclusive look at the workings of LitReactor. Here’s what’s there, and what we think about it. Access The first thing to know is that while some of the site’s content is free, but most is hidden behind a paywall. Membership at launch costs $9 a month, or $45 for six months – that’s more than Writer’s Digest, one of the site’s leading competitors, which costs $19.99 for 12 months. On the site LitReactor is broken down into four key areas: Classes Writers Workshop Craft Essays Magazine As well as a personalized Dashboard containing updates and more, and profile pages. Main Features Classes The online classes, which have individual price tags, involve lectures once or twice a week, weekly writing assignments, and small-group work. Some classes will last 4-6 weeks, while others will be weekend webinars, and they are open to both members and non members. Paying members get a discount on class rates, and can also sign up earlier than non members. The cost for a class will start at $295, depending on the length of the class and the profile of the tutor – Chuck Palahniuk has promised to teach a course in the future. Class sizes will be strictly limited, and students will be able to see each others’ responses to assignments, to aid in further discussion. Writers Workshop A members-only section in which writers submit work for feedback by the community, who can leave detailed responses along with star ratings for Concept, Structure, Characters and Dialogue. Non-members will be able to see the titles and synopses of submissions, but will not be able to download them or read feedback. This is where the most interesting aspect of the site comes into play. In order to submit a piece of work to the Workshop, users need a certain number of points. Points cannot be bought; instead, they are awarded for helpful comments on others’ work. This, say the team behind the site, limits the contributions of those who are “takers not givers”. At launch, it will take five comments that are rated “very helpful” by writers in order to generate enough points to make a fresh submission. (Users get one submission free when they buy a membership.) As with commenters at The Huffington Post, badges are also awarded by the site for various ‘achievements’, including first comments and first uploads. Craft Essays These are resources about the craft of writing, finding and agent, etc. Magazine Content about books and writing. They aim to post an article or more per day about famous authors, literary news and more. What we think: Overall, LitReactor has some smart ideas to try and encourage skills-based learning and community engagement for writers. It offers a well-designed system that seems easy to use, and is designed with simplicity and community at its heart. Some will balk at the idea of having to pay to access crowd-sourced feedback, however payment for peer critique has become quite common in sites such as these; in return, users can usually expect a more moderated, and considerate feedback space. A community is only as good as its members, but the points and badges systems, borrowed from videogaming, are a great way of encouraging good behavior. As for the classes, they can only be judged by the individual needs of their students, and the skills of the teachers, so we can’t really comment. A writing class can either be a great way to inspire better work, or an expensive distraction from it. All we can say is that the website that underpins it all seems to be solid, clear and easy to use. The launch selection of content in the Magazine also looks engaging and interesting, too. If LitReactor gets enough of a critical mass (no pun intended), and a decent archive of useful content, then it could become a great resource for experienced and amateur writers. The big question is, will enough engaged members pay their dues and stick around, in order to make it work? See below for images of LitReactor’s key features:

Continue reading …

Sometimes, size does matter, such as in spelunking or squeezing into a middle seat on economy class flights. “But the presidency? That’s ludicrous,” writes Frank Bruni in the New York Times , referring to recent sneering coverage of the portly Chris Christie and his presidential amibitions. There are plenty of reasons…

Continue reading …
Wish You Had a Girlfriend? New Service Offers You (a Fake) One

Craving some female attention? Fakegirlfriend.co offers a bit of the textual kind. If for some reason you’ve found yourself in need of a fake girlfriend — NewsFeed doesn’t want to imagine what that reason might be, but concedes there could be one — a new service will pose as a faithful paramour, who sends you

Continue reading …
TWCable TV app update brings captions, search, and parental controls

Time Warner has been streaming live TV to the iPad with its TWCable TV app since March and the most recent update brings even more traditional TV standbys to the tablet experience. Now live in v2.5.0 is a basic search function (titles or episode name only, keywords, cast and crew are coming soon), support for closed captions and the ability to block certain channels on the app for parents. There’s also a few bug fixes for those experiencing audio issues or not seeing their HD channels in the lineup — subscribers can check out the official blog for more details or just grab the free app on iTunes. TWCable TV app update brings captions, search, and parental controls originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:35:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
TWCable TV app update brings captions, search, and parental controls

Time Warner has been streaming live TV to the iPad with its TWCable TV app since March and the most recent update brings even more traditional TV standbys to the tablet experience. Now live in v2.5.0 is a basic search function (titles or episode name only, keywords, cast and crew are coming soon), support for closed captions and the ability to block certain channels on the app for parents. There’s also a few bug fixes for those experiencing audio issues or not seeing their HD channels in the lineup — subscribers can check out the official blog for more details or just grab the free app on iTunes. TWCable TV app update brings captions, search, and parental controls originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:35:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
James Corden: ‘I’m not sure people even think of me as an actor at all’

The comic actor is starring in One Man Two Guvnors in the West End, but he fears people still associate him with the mis-steps he took after his hit with Gavin and Stacey. Will his new memoir redeem his public image? In a small side room at the Guardian, with Al Pacino glowering from a poster above us, James Corden is performing a masterclass in modesty. He is quiet, contained, thoughtful. He rubs his nose, strokes his chin, considering his answers; if he had a forelock, I suspect he’d tug it. The main message is how fortunate he is. He feels privileged to be an actor, he says, grateful to appear on television, surprised at the breadth of his career, dumbfounded to be starring at the National Theatre . “I just feel lucky that I’m able to do so many different things,” he says. “I feel constantly amazed that I’m allowed to, you know?” If he were a superhero, he would be Humility Man: leaping small molehills in a few stuttering, stumbling steps. This is not the Corden I expected to meet. It certainly isn’t the Corden that makes people shudder. Every time I tell someone I’m interviewing him they flinch visibly and a horrified noise explodes through their nose. The consensus seems to be that the actor, comedy writer, co-creator of hit sitcom Gavin and Stacey , presenter of sports gameshow A League of Their Own , is arrogant and loud, his humour laddish and dated, that he has an unappealing, thespy air of entitlement. Also, most essentially, he’s attention-seeking. The title of his new autobiography – May I Have Your Attention, Please? – confirms this last point. I had expected the book to be a mea culpa , an attempt to win people over, and it is in part. Corden emphasises that over the past 18 months or so he has changed enormously, since falling in love with charity worker Julia Carey and having baby son Max. But he certainly doesn’t hide the side of him that sucks the air from the room. In the first few pages he writes about his earliest memory, aged four, standing on a chair at his younger sister’s christening, pulling faces while people laughed. “This felt good. Really good,” he writes. “In my head it became simple: if people are looking at me, and only me, it feels amazing. And that was that. From that day forward, every day became a quest to be noticed. To have the attention of people. Of you.” I searched for some explanation for this overweening neediness, riffling the pages with rising desperation. A dead parent? Dead sibling? Dead tortoise? Nothing. Admittedly, his father was once an RAF musician, who was sent to Iraq in the early 1990s as a stretcher-bearer, and while Corden says the day this was announced was one of the worst of his life – and the day his dad arrived back the very best – it’s bizarrely flat in the telling. He writes about going to RAF Uxbridge for the homecoming, and launches into a grumpy aside about the catering. “Someone had tried to set up some kind of a ‘buffet’ in the mess, but they shouldn’t have bothered. There were just lots of little bowls of crisps – rubbish crisps – and two bowls of peanuts. Now that’s all right, but that’s not a ‘buffet’.” This continues for some time. As I’ve scrawled in the margin:

Continue reading …
David Cameron: Tory party is ‘modern and compassionate’

As conference kicks off, PM unveils new housing policy, vows to kickstart economy and seeks to keep party on centre ground The prime minister pledged to “fire up the engine of the economy” on the first day of his party conference in Manchester, pushing a new homes policy but thwarting the desires of his backbenchers for a referendum on whether Britain should stay in the EU. The Conservatives announced plans – an extension of an existing programme – to boost the “right to buy” council house scheme introduced under Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s. David Cameron made the announcement to increase discounts to encourage council tenants to buy their own homes alongside a “build now, pay later” scheme to encourage developers to build on government land and only pay for the land once a house is sold. Cameron said the policies could lead to the building of 200,000 homes and the creation of 400,000 jobs. Cameron and his foreign secretary, William Hague, had warm words for their Lib Dem coalition partners alongside ploughing a fresh furrow – that it is the Tories as much as the Lib Dems who have pushed for “cuddly” policies, in the language of the prime minister. To mark this, on the first day of conference, the party sent out a pamphlet, Modern Compassionate Conservatism, as the Tories sought to emphasise they would be staying in the centre ground, despite pressure from some inside the party. “I don’t believe for a minute that this government is only held back by the cuddly Liberal Democrats,” Cameron said on the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme. “The proposal not to cut health spending came from the Conservatives.” Explaining the theme of conference, Cameron said: “I described myself as a modern, compassionate Conservative. Modern, because I think we’ve got to apply ourselves to the challenges of today … Compassionate, because we mustn’t leave people behind in our country … But I’m a Conservative because I believe, generally, if you give people more power and control over their own lives, they will actually make great decisions.” He also would not rule out asking Lib Dems to join a Tory government if they were to win a majority at the next election. He said: “What happens at the next election? We will fight as independent parties. We will be fighting to win. And whatever happens, happens.” Later in the day, Hague made a point of praising the Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, in his speech, though the mention received muted applause. He said: “Faced with a necessary but difficult decision over tuition fees, Nick Clegg stuck with it. In May, the British people affirmed by an overwhelming majority and with their usual good sense that first past the post is the best way of running our democracy and put to rest schemes of playing with the rules for a generation. He stuck with our agreement all the same. We should always have the generosity of spirit to recognise the contribution he makes to turning this country around.” The Tory leadership has had to manage disagreements with its voluble and increasingly muscular backbench and activist base over issues including Britain’s relationship with the EU and government planning reforms. The Mail on Sunday reported that MPs will get to debate the issue of whether or not there should be a referendum on Europe – because more than 100,000 people have signed a petition asking for a debate the Commons backbench committee will table it for debate in parliament. Cameron’s comments suggested government MPs will be told to vote against it. The prime minister said: “There is a European treaty that is happening right now. This is the treaty that gets us out of the bail-out mechanism that Labour got us into. Further, future treaty change is not an immediate prospect.” “For the longer term, I’ve been very clear, I think we gave too much power to Europe. There are some powers I would like to get back. Any future treaty change would be an opportunity to do that. But right now that’s not on the immediate agenda.” Another flashpoint is the Human Rights Act which, in opposition, the Tories had said they would scrap and replace with a bill of rights. The home secretary, Theresa May, confirmed this still remained her wish and later the prime minister weighed in behind her. However both politicians are hamstrung by being in coalition with the Lib Dems and subject to a commission being controlled by justice secretary Ken Clarke and Nick Clegg meaning it is unlikely that the tory party itself will do anything distinctive on the human rights act ahead of the next election. Cameron said: “One of the problems we have here is not just the Human Rights Act. It’s the chilling culture under it that means that someone drives a police van … to move a prisoner 200 yards when he was perfectly happy to walk. The Human Rights Act doesn’t say that that’s what you have to do. It’s the chilling effect of people thinking I will be found guilty under it. “I think that government can do a huge amount to communicate to institutions and individuals, let’s have some common sense, let’s have some judgment, let’s have that applying rather than this over-interpretation of what’s there.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives David Cameron Housing Communities Liberal-Conservative coalition Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
David Cameron: Tory party is ‘modern and compassionate’

As conference kicks off, PM unveils new housing policy, vows to kickstart economy and seeks to keep party on centre ground The prime minister pledged to “fire up the engine of the economy” on the first day of his party conference in Manchester, pushing a new homes policy but thwarting the desires of his backbenchers for a referendum on whether Britain should stay in the EU. The Conservatives announced plans – an extension of an existing programme – to boost the “right to buy” council house scheme introduced under Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s. David Cameron made the announcement to increase discounts to encourage council tenants to buy their own homes alongside a “build now, pay later” scheme to encourage developers to build on government land and only pay for the land once a house is sold. Cameron said the policies could lead to the building of 200,000 homes and the creation of 400,000 jobs. Cameron and his foreign secretary, William Hague, had warm words for their Lib Dem coalition partners alongside ploughing a fresh furrow – that it is the Tories as much as the Lib Dems who have pushed for “cuddly” policies, in the language of the prime minister. To mark this, on the first day of conference, the party sent out a pamphlet, Modern Compassionate Conservatism, as the Tories sought to emphasise they would be staying in the centre ground, despite pressure from some inside the party. “I don’t believe for a minute that this government is only held back by the cuddly Liberal Democrats,” Cameron said on the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme. “The proposal not to cut health spending came from the Conservatives.” Explaining the theme of conference, Cameron said: “I described myself as a modern, compassionate Conservative. Modern, because I think we’ve got to apply ourselves to the challenges of today … Compassionate, because we mustn’t leave people behind in our country … But I’m a Conservative because I believe, generally, if you give people more power and control over their own lives, they will actually make great decisions.” He also would not rule out asking Lib Dems to join a Tory government if they were to win a majority at the next election. He said: “What happens at the next election? We will fight as independent parties. We will be fighting to win. And whatever happens, happens.” Later in the day, Hague made a point of praising the Lib Dem leader, Nick Clegg, in his speech, though the mention received muted applause. He said: “Faced with a necessary but difficult decision over tuition fees, Nick Clegg stuck with it. In May, the British people affirmed by an overwhelming majority and with their usual good sense that first past the post is the best way of running our democracy and put to rest schemes of playing with the rules for a generation. He stuck with our agreement all the same. We should always have the generosity of spirit to recognise the contribution he makes to turning this country around.” The Tory leadership has had to manage disagreements with its voluble and increasingly muscular backbench and activist base over issues including Britain’s relationship with the EU and government planning reforms. The Mail on Sunday reported that MPs will get to debate the issue of whether or not there should be a referendum on Europe – because more than 100,000 people have signed a petition asking for a debate the Commons backbench committee will table it for debate in parliament. Cameron’s comments suggested government MPs will be told to vote against it. The prime minister said: “There is a European treaty that is happening right now. This is the treaty that gets us out of the bail-out mechanism that Labour got us into. Further, future treaty change is not an immediate prospect.” “For the longer term, I’ve been very clear, I think we gave too much power to Europe. There are some powers I would like to get back. Any future treaty change would be an opportunity to do that. But right now that’s not on the immediate agenda.” Another flashpoint is the Human Rights Act which, in opposition, the Tories had said they would scrap and replace with a bill of rights. The home secretary, Theresa May, confirmed this still remained her wish and later the prime minister weighed in behind her. However both politicians are hamstrung by being in coalition with the Lib Dems and subject to a commission being controlled by justice secretary Ken Clarke and Nick Clegg meaning it is unlikely that the tory party itself will do anything distinctive on the human rights act ahead of the next election. Cameron said: “One of the problems we have here is not just the Human Rights Act. It’s the chilling culture under it that means that someone drives a police van … to move a prisoner 200 yards when he was perfectly happy to walk. The Human Rights Act doesn’t say that that’s what you have to do. It’s the chilling effect of people thinking I will be found guilty under it. “I think that government can do a huge amount to communicate to institutions and individuals, let’s have some common sense, let’s have some judgment, let’s have that applying rather than this over-interpretation of what’s there.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Conservatives David Cameron Housing Communities Liberal-Conservative coalition Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …