Home » Archives by category » News (Page 4757)
David Gregory Accuses Gingrich of Racism for Calling Obama a ‘Food Stamp President’

As NewsBusters has been reporting for several months, Obama-loving media are doing their darnedest to depict every potential Republican presidential candidate as a racist. Doing his part, NBC's David Gregory on Sunday's “Meet the Press” accused Newt Gingrich of racism for having called Barack Obama “The most successful food stamp president in American history” (video follows with transcript and commentary): DAVID GREGORY, HOST: What, what about jobs? Jobless rate now at 9 percent. You gave a speech on Friday in Georgia, and you said the following about this president: (Videotape) NEWT GINGRICH: You want to be a country that creates food stamps, in which case frankly Obama's is an enormous success. The most successful food stamp president in American history. Or do you want to be a country that creates paychecks? (End videotape) GREGORY: First of all, you gave a speech in Georgia with language a lot of people think could be coded racially-tinged language, calling the president, the first black president, a food stamp president. GINGRICH: Oh, come on, David. GREGORY: What did you mean? What was the point? REP. GINGRICH: That's, that's bizarre. That–this kind of automatic reference to racism, this is the president of the United States. The president of the United States has to be held accountable. Now, the idea that–and what I said is factually true. Forty-seven million Americans are on food stamps. One out of every six Americans is on food stamps. And to hide behind the charge of racism? I have–I have never said anything about President Obama which is racist. Gingrich and all Republicans having the nerve to toss their hats into the ring better get used to this kind of question because absolutely every criticism they offer about the current White House resident in the next seventeen-plus months is going to be tied to the color of Obama's skin. It really is disgraceful that Americans have to be subjected to this nonsense in the year 2011. Our nation has very serious problems – probably the most serious since World War II. Media members like Gregory are constantly asking where the adults are in Washington willing to face these problems head on. Yet whenever someone on the right side of the aisle tries to do exactly that, he or she is immediately accused of racism. Maybe Gregory and his Obama-loving colleagues are the ones that need to grow up. (H/T Amanda Carpenter ) *****Update: For those interested in the demographics of food stamp usage, the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire did an interesting study in 2005. They found that in rural areas, 53 percent of food stamp recipients were white as compared to 27 percent black. In urban areas, this breakdown was 34 percent white to 35 percent black. As such, despite Gregory's insinuation, food stamp usage is not a racial issue at all and shouldn't be depicted as such.

Continue reading …
David Gregory Accuses Gingrich of Racism for Calling Obama a ‘Food Stamp President’

As NewsBusters has been reporting for several months, Obama-loving media are doing their darnedest to depict every potential Republican presidential candidate as a racist. Doing his part, NBC's David Gregory on Sunday's “Meet the Press” accused Newt Gingrich of racism for having called Barack Obama “The most successful food stamp president in American history” (video follows with transcript and commentary): DAVID GREGORY, HOST: What, what about jobs? Jobless rate now at 9 percent. You gave a speech on Friday in Georgia, and you said the following about this president: (Videotape) NEWT GINGRICH: You want to be a country that creates food stamps, in which case frankly Obama's is an enormous success. The most successful food stamp president in American history. Or do you want to be a country that creates paychecks? (End videotape) GREGORY: First of all, you gave a speech in Georgia with language a lot of people think could be coded racially-tinged language, calling the president, the first black president, a food stamp president. GINGRICH: Oh, come on, David. GREGORY: What did you mean? What was the point? REP. GINGRICH: That's, that's bizarre. That–this kind of automatic reference to racism, this is the president of the United States. The president of the United States has to be held accountable. Now, the idea that–and what I said is factually true. Forty-seven million Americans are on food stamps. One out of every six Americans is on food stamps. And to hide behind the charge of racism? I have–I have never said anything about President Obama which is racist. Gingrich and all Republicans having the nerve to toss their hats into the ring better get used to this kind of question because absolutely every criticism they offer about the current White House resident in the next seventeen-plus months is going to be tied to the color of Obama's skin. It really is disgraceful that Americans have to be subjected to this nonsense in the year 2011. Our nation has very serious problems – probably the most serious since World War II. Media members like Gregory are constantly asking where the adults are in Washington willing to face these problems head on. Yet whenever someone on the right side of the aisle tries to do exactly that, he or she is immediately accused of racism. Maybe Gregory and his Obama-loving colleagues are the ones that need to grow up. (H/T Amanda Carpenter ) *****Update: For those interested in the demographics of food stamp usage, the Carsey Institute at the University of New Hampshire did an interesting study in 2005. They found that in rural areas, 53 percent of food stamp recipients were white as compared to 27 percent black. In urban areas, this breakdown was 34 percent white to 35 percent black. As such, despite Gregory's insinuation, food stamp usage is not a racial issue at all and shouldn't be depicted as such.

Continue reading …

Country’s current power couple Miranda Lambert and Blake Shelton were married in Texas. Miranda Lambert wore her mother’s wedding dress in the wedding ceremony held at the Don Strange Ranch in front of guests that includes Reba McEntire and Cee Lo Green. Miranda Lambert has been working out to stay in shape for her big Miranda Lambert and Blake Shelton Wedding is a post from: Daily World Buzz

Continue reading …

At a military complex surrounded by the sands of the United Arab Emirates, Blackwater founder Erik Prince has set up a hundreds-member-strong, $529-million private army designed to suppress internal revolts, protect high-rises and oil infrastructure from terrorist attack, and conduct special operations both in and out of the UAE, reports…

Continue reading …
Rand Paul: “People Who Believe in Universal Healthcare Believe in Slavery”

Libertarians? No, thank you. I’m full. Uh-oh. Here I go again with all my blackity black talk. I will endeavor to keep a cool head. I do not want to offend anyone’s sensibilities, nor would I like to be seen as one of “those people” who takes the bait when “scooby snacks” are dangled in Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Balloon Juice Discovery Date : 14/05/2011 04:48 Number of articles : 3

Continue reading …
Wigan Athletic 3-2 West Ham United | Premier League match report

With a plane circling overhead towing a banner that proclaimed “Avram Grant Millwall Legend”, West Ham were relegated from the Premier League in circumstances that will justify those calling for the dismissal of the club’s manager. Two up with a little over half an hour remaining, West Ham saw the lead snatched from them and were beaten with almost the final kick of the game when Robert Green, who had made some vital blocks, allowed a long-range, speculative shot from Charles N’Zogbia to slide under his body. The final whistle and a joyous pitch invasion followed. The match had a frantic feel to it from the start but it was West Ham who seized control through Demba Ba and Thomas Hitzlsperger. First, the German sent over a deep cross that Ba headed home from close range almost unmarked. Then the German delivered a free-kick that James Tomkins headed across the face of the goal and Ba bundled home between two covering defenders. Wigan always enjoyed the bulk of possession but it seemed that some superlative keeping from Green, particularly when denying a point-blank header from Hugo Rodallega, would be decisive. However, at half-time, Roberto Martínez made a double substitution that helped swing the game, while Grant’s talisman, Scott Parker remained on the bench until the 61st minute. Four minutes before Wigan had pulled a goal back when Tomkins bundled over N’Zogbia and the Frenchman drove the free-kick he had won so spectacularly into the roof of Green’s net. Moments later Ba had a one-on-one to seal his hat-trick and effectively the match. He drove his shot straight at Ali al-Habsi. Wigan were soon level and, when Connor Sammon slid between two West Ham defenders to turn home his shot, all the desire and inspiration drained from Grant’s side. Ben Watson struck the post before N’Zogbia sealed the match and, by the end, the 4,500 who had travelled from London were chanting: “Avram on the dole”. They will not have to wait long. Premier League Wigan Athletic West Ham United Tim Rich guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
British defence chiefs want Nato to step up attacks on Gaddafi’s forces

General Sir David Richards says Nato must consider increasing range of legitimate targets in Libya or settle for stalemate British defence chiefs are applying pressure on other Nato countries to intensify the bombing campaign against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime amid deepening concerns that military action will end in stalemate. Nearly two months since the start of air strikes against Libya, Nato chiefs fear divisions within the alliance, and at the UN, will lead to fewer air strikes just at a time when, they claim, the regime is starting to feel the pinch and even its core support showing signs of cracking. They want Nato to expand its targets, as the UK and a number of smaller Nato nations already have done, to include more static targets such as command and control centres and not only those posing a direct and clear threat to Libyan civilians, such as tanks and artillery. Well-placed British government officials made this plain on Sunday as General Sir David Richards, chief of the defence staff, said that he wanted the rules of engagement changed so that attacks can be launched against the infrastructure propping up Gaddafi’s regime. “The vice is closing on Gaddafi, but we need to increase the pressure further through more intense military action,” Richards told the Sunday Telegraph. “We now have to tighten the vice to demonstrate to Gaddafi that the game is up and he must go,” he added. “We need to do more. “If we do not up the ante now there is a risk that the conflict could result in Gaddafi clinging to power.” Richards added: “At present Nato is not attacking infrastructure targets in Libya. But if we want to increase the pressure on Gaddafi’s regime then we need to give serious consideration to increasing the range of targets we can hit.” Though he said that Nato forces were not targeting Gaddafi directly, the Libyan leader could become a legitimate target if he was discovered directing attacks against Libyan civilians. The UN security council resolution allowed Nato to use “all necessary means” to protect civilians. “We are not targeting Gaddafi directly, but if it happened that he was in a command and control centre that was hit by Nato and he was killed, then that is within the rules,” Richards said. Taking a much tougher line than earlier in the conflict when he made clear Gaddafi was not a target – and was sharply criticised by Downing Street for his pains – Richards now says that Gaddafi cannot be allowed to remain in power. “If Nato withdraws its forces with Gaddafi still in power, then there is a significant risk that he will launch fresh attacks against the rebels,” he said. Significantly, Richards added: “The prime minister and I are on the same page. We are in total agreement that the only solution to this conflict is for Gaddafi to go.” Liam Fox, the defence secretary, admitted on Sunday that a number of Nato countries were “less happy” with Britain’s decision to extend the number of targets, to include command and control centres and what he called “intelligence networks”. Speaking on BBC1′s Politics Show, he said: “Not all Nato countries take the same view.” Fox added that if Gaddafi regime commanders chose to be in a command and control centre it was “a risk they take”. Concern among senior defence officials is likely to be increased further as Baroness Amos, former Labour cabinet minister and now top UN official for humanitarian relief, responded to Richards’s comments by calling for a temporary halt to hostilities. She called for a political solution as soon as possible, adding that “any upscaling of the fighting will have a significant impact on the people”. Adrian Mitchell, the international development secretary, said it was not the coalition engaged in air strikes, but Gaddafi”s forces, who were preventing medical supplies and food from being distributed. The military campaign was not about “targeting individuals”, he said. Libya Muammar Gaddafi Military Defence policy Nato General Sir David Richards David Cameron Richard Norton-Taylor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
12 Prospective Jurors Picked for Anthony Trial

Four additional jurors, including a student and a truck driver, were picked Saturday in the murder trial of Casey Anthony, bringing the total number selected to 12. Judge Belvin Perry has said he would like to start opening arguments on Tuesday. (May 15)

Continue reading …

. This is why Newt can never be a serious candidate for the Republican Party and if he was as smart as he keeps telling us he is, he’d know it. There is no way that conservatives will be able to get past all the sordid aspects of Newt’s personal failings. It’s not the hypocrisy of prosecuting Clinton while having an affair, it’s that he dumped his first wife (whom he dated secretly while she was his high school geometry teacher and married to get out of going to Vietnam) while she was recovering from cancer surgery. It’s about her suing him to get him to pay child support, while he was taking money from special interests. It’s about all the messy details his scorned second wife told the media after he told her he wanted to annul their 18 year marriage so that his third marriage would be recognized in his fiancee’s church. And then openly carried on with the now third Mrs. Gingrich for years (Vanity Fair referred to her by the classy euphemism of “Gingrich’s frequent breakfast companion”). How can social conservatives possibly bring themselves to vote for someone when it’s open knowledge that he prefers oral sex from his women friends so that he has the plausible deniability that he didn’t “sleep” with that person? Newt has had to find ways to deal with this and sadly, this pathetic approach is the best he’s got: “Yeah, I’ve been a bad boy, but look at me now!” It’s pretty big leap Newt is asking his supporters to take to believe that all those horndog tendencies were youthful indiscretion, especially since he was in his mid-50s when he hooked up with his latest wife. And like the husband caught with lipstick on his collar, promising that it won’t happen ever again, it’s foolish to believe that Newt’s fundamental selfishness will change.

Continue reading …
Would You Remarry Your Ex?

You were in love. It didn’t work out. You split. Then one day something happens — maybe your parent dies or you get sick or you realize you’re tired of the dating game at midlife — and you start thinking, “I want my ex back.” No worries because there are about 58,000 “proven techniques” on the Internet to help you do exactly that. That seems to be stuff of snake-oil con men but there are plenty of people who do want their ex back, and get them — most recently Marie Osmond, who just re-married her first husband, former pro-basketball player Steve Craig. The two were married from 1982 to 1985 and had one child, Stephen, now 28 years old. “I didn’t want anybody to get hurt, you know if it didn’t work out,” Osmond told Good Morning America of their dating on the sly for the past two years. “And gosh, it just worked out.” For many divorced people having root canal would be preferable to remarrying the ex; after all, he or she’s an ex for a reason. In Osmond’s case, it was “mental cruelty” that drove her to divorce court the first time. But then in 2010, Osmond’s 18-year-old son from a second marriage that ended in divorce in 2007 committed suicide, and Craig was there for her. During a tragedy, we count on the people who know us best to show up, and he did. That’s pretty powerful. But is that and a couple’s shared history enough to sustain a remarriage? Perhaps not; while about 45 percent to 50 percent of marriages end in divorce about 60 percent to 80 percent of second marriages divorce (although numbers vary on how many of those second marriages are to the former spouse or a different one with assorted children from different parents all trying to live happily a la the Brady Bunch under one roof). Of the seven children Osmond, 51, had with second hubby Brian Blosil, five of whom are adopted, three are still young — 15, 14 and 9. In a Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous segment Osmond and Craig filmed shortly after Stephen was born, both Osmond and Craig note how “difficult” having a child is. “Becoming pregnant changes your free time. It’s been enjoyable but it’s also very difficult,” Craig, 54, said at the time. Sure, babies are difficult, but I wouldn’t exactly call melding families with a 15-, 14- and 9-year-old still at home any easier. But maybe that’s just me. The bigger issue for exes who are remarrying is personal growth, as in has there been any? “Remarrying may be a good idea if, during your time apart, you’ve changed elements of your behavior that were causing the problems in your relationship. Then you’re not the same person you were before and you have a better chance of success second time around,” says U.K. psychologist Denise Knowles. But if you haven’t, it’s too easy to slip back into old habits. “Do that and the relationship certainly won’t last,” she says. And we all know how “easy” it is to change at midlife. Of course, Osmond and Craig aren’t the only ones to tie the knot again. Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton did it, so did Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith, Elliot Gould and Jennifer Bogart, Stephen Crane and Lana Turner, Eminem (Marshall Mathers III) and Kimberley Scott. And it’s not just celebrities; according to research by Nancy Kalish, Ph.D., a psychology professor at California State University in Sacramento, about 6 percent of the participants worldwide noted that they married, divorced, and then remarried their former spouse. In her book Lost & Found Lovers: Facts and Fantasies of Rekindled Romances, Kalish, who studied 1,001 reunited couples from 1993 to 1996 — many who married just out of high school — found that 72 percent of those reunions were successful. There was an even higher success rate if they reunited with lost loves from when they were 17 or younger. Science writer Rachel Clark, who chronicles her marriage, divorce and remarriage to her former husband on the Psychology Today blog, Marry, Divorce, Reconcile, believes the 6 percent is too low. So does Michele Weiner Davis, founder of the Divorce Busting Center and author of Divorce Busting and The Sex-Starved Marriage; she believes about 10 percent of the population remarries their spouse. “People in long-term healthy marriages experience many divorces over the course of their lifetimes, it’s just that they never leave and they remarry each other,” Davis says. “Marriage changes over time. We need to divorce our ‘old’ partners and start relationships with our ‘new partners,’ without ever leaving home.” That may be so, but once you do leave, the old Thomas Wolfe book comes to mind; you can’t go home again. And that’s what Kalish found out in her ongoing study of rekindled romances in 2005 and 2006. Many of the reunions of the 1,600 couples she spoke to were disastrous, mostly because a lot of them were already married and still pining for their old flame. Some did more than pine — they had affairs with them. Her research shows only about 5 percent of cheaters actually leave their marriage and marry their lost love. Kalish’s advice about getting in touch with an ex: “If you are happy in your marriage, and don’t want to lose it, don’t even try.” And if you’re happy as a divorced person, be very, very careful about romanticizing your ex. Even with all those “proven techniques” to get him or her back.

Continue reading …