Israeli troops clashed with Arab protesters Sunday along three hostile borders, including the frontier with Syria, leaving 16 people dead and dozens more wounded in an unprecedented wave of demonstrations. (May 15)
Continue reading …Glenn Beck addressed the controversy surrounding his comments about Meghan McCain during his weekly appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s show on Friday–but did not apologize for making them. Beck landed in hot water with the McCains after he pretended to vomit for several minutes on his radio show while watching Meghan McCain’s skin cancer awareness ad, where she appears to be naked. His routine prompted a volley of angry responses from Meghan, Cindy and John McCain, but Beck had not responded to the attacks until Friday. Bill O’Reilly sided with Beck’s detractors in this case. “If I was Cindy McCain I’d slap the hell out of you,” he told Beck. Beck said that she was sticking up for her daughter, and that she was “right” to do so. “I would do the same thing,” he said. He then joked that he was “helping bring attention” to skin cancer awareness by telling Meghan McCain to “cover up.” O’Reilly said he was baffled that Beck had done such a “dopey” thing, because “you’re genuinely a nice guy.” Beck admitted that the routine was a “juvenile bit,” but he refused to go any further. “You know what, Meghan McCain? Please,” he said. “I’ve had enough of Meghan McCain as much as she’s had enough of me.” WATCH:
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — Surrounded by the din of his multiple families within walls that were both his sanctuary and prison, Osama bin Laden pecked endlessly at a computer, issuing directives to his scattered and troubled terrorist empire. It’s not clear who really listened. Go big, he told al-Qaida operatives and affiliates. They mostly went small. The latest intelligence from the wealth of material found at bin Laden’s last hideout paints a complicated picture of the fugitive, both deeply engaged in his life’s violent mission and somewhat out to pasture. Inside the Abbottabad, Pakistan, compound, he kept busy scheming plots, rehearsed and recorded propaganda and dispatched couriers to distant Internet cafes to conduct his email traffic, using computer flash drives to relay messages he would write and store from his shabby office. He dyed his gray beard black to keep up appearances for the videos. To U.S. officials, who possess bin Laden’s handwritten personal journal as well as an enormous cache of his digital documents, the still-unfolding discoveries show he was more involved in trying to plan al-Qaida’s post-911 operations than they had thought possible for a man in perpetual hiding. Even so, he was disconnected from his organization in real time, lacking phones or the Internet at his hideout and with loyalists hunted at every turn. Essential elements of a command and control function from Abbottabad appear to be missing. Among the items found was an unreleased audiotape, recorded about a week before the raid, in which bin Laden praises those who rebelled in the “Arab spring,” referring to revolts in the Mideast and North Africa, a U.S. official says. But bin Laden only mentions Egypt and Tunisia, though he would have been aware through news broadcasts on his cable TV feed of the uprisings in Libya, Syria, and the Gulf state Bahrain, the official noted, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss matters of intelligence. Another discovered video shows bin Laden channel surfing with a tiny TV while wrapped in a wool blanket, wearing a knit cap and looking anything but content. Toward its own propaganda ends, the U.S. released selective excerpts of these odd home movies, choosing clips that only show the Prince of jihad in an unflattering, even pathetic, light. For a man working from home, there seemed to be many distractions. The U.S. raiders who killed him, a grown son and others May 2 encountered 23 children and nine women on the grounds of the three-story complex behind walls stained with mold, including three of his wives, officials said afterward. The U.S. has questioned those widows, the Pentagon said Friday without revealing if anything was learned. U.S. officials also said the raiders found a collection of pornography in the materials they confiscated but it was not clear who owned it or had seen it. The compound is hardly the plush redoubt U.S. officials described in the immediate aftermath of the Navy SEALs assault. Yet the Saudi son of privilege, who long ago renounced wealth and creature comforts, had lived in far more Spartan circumstances even if he was not quite the cave-dweller of Western lore. As bizarre as it might be to know he spent his last months surrounded by children, any thought of domestic tranquility is probably a stretch. This was a man who forced his family to live without air conditioning or a refrigerator in stifling heat in pre-terrorist days, who beat them and let his fighters experiment on their pets with poison gas, and made his family dig and sleep in ditches on a desert camping trip, according to a son and another wife who collaborated on the book “Growing Up Bin Laden.” Such a harsh disposition with family was disputed by Ahmed Abdel-Fatah al-Sada, a father-in-law, who told The Associated Press in Yemen that bin Laden was a “kind and noble” man, “easygoing and modest, giving you the feeling that he was sincere.” Al-Sada’s daughter, Amal, 29, was shot in the leg during the raid as she rushed the Navy SEALs, U.S. officials said. There is no dispute that bin Laden spent time in his lair dreaming up ways to kill Americans in great numbers again, for the terrorist believed that only mass casualties could move U.S. policy. Communicating both with his core group and al-Qaida affiliates, he advised plots against cities spared on Sept. 11, 2001, such as Los Angeles, and wanted to explore attacking trains. Whatever the target, he sought a body count of thousands, the records indicate. But not everyone was marching to his drum. The Yemen branch of al-Qaida, which now overshadows bin Laden’s central operation as the organization’s top money-raising, propaganda and operational arm, has embraced the smaller-scale attacks that bin Laden thought were unsuccessful. Others in the network, too, have urged the likeminded to kill Americans wherever and however they can, without coordination or elaborate planning. So far intelligence officials have not identified specific targets or plots for coming attacks in their initial analysis of the 100 or so flash drives and five computers that the assault team took from the compound. Nor have they found that bin Laden was capable of coordinating the timing of attacks across the various al-Qaida affiliates in Pakistan, Yemen, Algeria, Iraq and Somalia. Officials have seen no evidence that he was directly behind the attempted Christmas Day 2009 bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner or the nearly successful attack on cargo planes heading for Chicago and Philadelphia, as much as those operations seemed out of his playbook. Indeed, it remains unknown just what bin Laden accomplished for his jihad after the attacks of 2001 other than to stay alive and at large for nearly a decade afterward. That itself was quite a feat but one that denied him a reprise of the American body count he wanted until the end. ___ Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier and Matt Apuzzo contributed to this report.
Continue reading …Experience tells us that the Republican presidential candidate the media prefer is the one they believe is most easily defeated. On this weekend's “Chris Matthews Show,” seven of the twelve regulars said Mitch Daniels “has the best shot to overcome his obvious flaw” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS: We put it to the Matthews Meter, twelve of our regulars including Howard, Katty and Norah, “Which candidate has the best shot to overcome his obvious flaw?” Well this is surprising I guess. Seven said Mitch Daniels. Three said John Huntsman, two, one each for Mitt Romney and one for Pawlenty. According to Matthews, Daniels' “flaw” is the issue surrounding him having divorced and remarried his current wife. Romney's of course is Massachusetts health care. Huntsman's is his connection to President Obama as well as support for same-sex marriage. Tim Pawlenty's is his support for cap-and-trade. Regardless of the seriousness of any of these issues in the minds of primary voters, conservatives have to be suspicious when liberal media members start jumping on a Republican's bandwagon. The only elephants they like are RINOs, ones that are easily defeated, or both. As Rush Limbaugh said on his radio show Monday: Why do you think the Democrats want us to nominate him? Do they really want to nominate a challenger here? (laughing) They really want us to nominate somebody they really think could beat Obama? Is that what they want us to do? And there's this phrase again: serious. That's the new gravitas. That's the new, “He's an intellectual. He's a serious person.” It also means boring and moderate, and it does not mean conservative. We are to believe that Obama and the Democrats seriously want a strong challenger for Obama! Just ask yourself a simple question. You're a member of the Obama regime (or you are a high-ranking member of the Democrat National Committee) and your first and foremost objective right now is raising money so as to secure the reelection victory of Barack Obama. That's what you live for. Are you really going to go out and try to find a Republican who could beat you, and then call a reporter for the Washington Post and say, “You know, we're really scared of this guy. If this guy, Daniels, gets in, we're gonna be really worried. If this guy Daniels doesn't get in, well, it's home free for us; 'cause the rest of that field's a joke.” Is that how you're gonna think, that the strongest opponent you have is who you're going to trumpet? So what they are doing is they are trying to take out every candidate on the Republican side they can think of. They are already started impugning one candidate after another. Now, you know my theory: They will always tell us who they fear. I'm not trying to cause any problems here (I'm really not), but it's obvious to me they don't fear Mitch Daniels. Maybe in time they'll come to fear him, but right now Mitch Daniels is who they want to run against. Now, less than a week later, the Matthews crew overwhelmingly claims Daniels is the most likely to overcome his flaw. These are the same people that wanted McCain in 2008. Regardless of what your views are of Daniels, if liberal media members want him to oppose Obama, it's not because they think he can win. Just something to consider.
Continue reading …Boston Red Sox designated hitter David Ortiz goes through the streets of New York in a Red Sox uniform looking for hugs. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : SOX Discovery Date : 13/05/2011 22:14 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …American director promises ‘a good romp and a cracking yarn’ in film version of The Crooked House Neil LaBute has carved a career from seriously disturbing plays and films – In the Company of Men, The Shape of Things – that plunge deep into the American male psyche and find it to be damaged, selfish and brutal. But now the writer and director is turning to a gentler, politer and certainly more English material: Agatha Christie. And, he says, he promises “a good romp and a cracking yarn”. LaBute is to direct a film of Christie’s novel The Crooked House, with a screenplay adapted by Julian Fellowes, of Gosford Park and Downton Abbey fame. Though LaBute has ventured into period drama once before – Possession, the AS Byatt novel whose adaptation he directed, flips between the 19th and 20th centuries – he is certainly more associated with dystopian urban fables than the tinkling tea-cups and well-appointed drawing rooms of Christie’s classic murder mysteries. “I have always liked whodunnits,” LaBute said. “And I mean real whodunnits, not mystery-slash-thriller-slash-horror whodunits. I thought, ‘When did I last see one of those? And in fact it was probably Gosford Park: at least a nominal portion of Gosford Park had a whodunnit running through it.” As LaBute points out, The Crooked House is “atypical for Christie: often there is a small Belgian or an elderly lady solving the crimes”. This novel, by contrast, features neither Hercule Poirot nor Miss Marple, but is a standalone story with a young man called Charles Hayward attempting to solve the mystery of the murder of the wealthy Aristide Leonides, with whose daughter, Sophie, he is in love. The entire extended family – the inhabitants of the “crooked house” – falls under suspicion. Matthew Goode, who played Charles Ryder in the 2008 film of Brideshead Revisited, is to play Charles Hayward, with Gemma Arterton – who last year charmed Cannes with her performance in the title role of Tamara Drewe – as Sophia. Julie Andrews will play Aristide’s bitter, repressed sister-in-law Edith de Haviland, and Gabriel Byrne, Sophia’s elder brother Roger. The film is set to start shooting in September. LaBute said of the character of Hayward: “To have someone so hellbent on finding out the truth and is asked huge moral questions – I don’t often ask these questions of my boy-men characters, who are generally cowardly, duplicitous and selfish.” LaBute, whose work usually feels more akin to noir thriller writer Patricia Highsmith than Agatha Christie, said the novel was “twisted enough for me”. He added: “Christie may be even more twisted than I am. I think I may have met my match.” In this book, he said, she was “in the vanguard of bad seeds”. But the writer and director – whom the New York Times has described as a specialist in “two-legged wolves and pigs who wear the camouflage of business suits and golf sweaters” – also declared himself an unlikely fan of the classic film adaptations of Christie novels of the 1970s. “I love what Sidney Lumet did with Murder on the Orient Express,” he said. “And I love the almost kabuki-like performance of Albert Finney as Poirot.” He also expressed his admiration for David Suchet’s bustling interpretation of the role for television, and Peter Ustinov’s “bumbling” Poirot in Death on the Nile (1978). LaBute declared himself enthusiastic about the period setting, and said that he wanted to introduce a feel of his favourite 1940s and 50s films. He namechecked Douglas Sirk, Powell and Pressburger, and said he was fan of “domestic noirs such as Mildred Pierce and especially Leave Her To Heaven”. He wanted to create a feel, he said, of “deep Technicolor and dark shadows”. LaBute’s cinematic and theatrical career has had its ups and downs. After a startling film debut with In the Company of Men, he hit a low point with a critically disastrous remake of The Wicker Man (2006). Known for his depiction of human, particularly male, cruelty, his latest play, In a Forest Dark and Deep is playing at the Vaudeville Theatre in London, with Matthew Fox, who starred in the television series Lost, and Olivia Williams. The Mercy Seat (2002), told the story of a man who uses his proximity to the September 11 attacks to disappear from his suburban life. Cannes 2011 Agatha Christie Neil LaBute Gemma Arterton Gabriel Byrne Olivia Williams Sidney Lumet Charlotte Higgins guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Lib Dems on defensive following reports of phone transcript in which energy secretary pressed witness to keep quiet The Liberal Democrat hierarchy has defended Chris Huhne after a tape recording emerged in which the energy secretary allegedly pressed a witness not to discuss claims he had tried to avoid a driving ban. Aides to the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, said they believed nothing new had surfaced to change the energy secretary’s status since Vicky Pryce, from whom Huhne separated last year, made the initial claims 10 days ago. However, the local police force said it was deciding whether or not to investigate. Pryce claims Huhne “pressurised people” to take on his penalty points for speeding to avoid a driving ban in 2003 when he was an MEP and before he became the Lib Dem MP for Eastleigh. Huhne strenuously denies the claims. The Sunday Times reported that it had seen a transcript of a phone call in which Huhne urged the person with whom he was in conversation not to speak to reporters and to stay silent about the allegations. The call was said to have taken place before the allegations became public. Huhne was reported as having said: “If I were you … do not talk. I would have thought you would not want to talk.” He is also reported to have given advice on how to avoid journalists: “Just say, ‘Terribly bad line, terribly sorry, bad reception, I’ll talk to you later,’ and hang up.” Labour MP Simon Danczuk lodged a formal complaint with Essex police force. A spokesman for Essex police said: “We are aware of allegations regarding a speeding offence in 2003. This information will be passed to officers who will decide on whether an investigation will be launched. We take allegations such as this extremely seriously and will take action where necessary.” In recognition of the escalating severity of the claims, Huhne has instructed Charlotte Harris, a partner at London law firm Mishcon de Reya. Huhne and Clegg met last week to discuss the situation and in that meeting Huhne denied all allegations. A Lib Dem source said: “We are in a similar place to where we were last weekend. Has there been produced something devastating? Not really.” The party view is that at no point during the quotes attributed to Huhne did he admit the charge, the source added, pointing to a section where he insisted there was no truth in the allegation. Huhne is alleged by the Mail on Sunday and Sunday Times to have said towards the end of the 13-minute conversation: “There’s no question of it coming out, because it’s simply not true, that’s it.” The other person in the phone call then said, “I’m sorry, what? Why are you suddenly saying that?” Huhne is reported to then say it is not “sensible to have these sorts of conversations on the phone”. The coalition is uncertain how it would accommodate the loss of another Lib Dem cabinet minister, with David Laws likely to be out of action for at least a year. The Commons will vote on Monday to suspend Laws from the house for seven days – one of the most severe penalties an MP can face – after the report last week by the parliamentary commissioner found evidence of “serious” offences. The coalition deal requires five cabinet ministers from the junior partner in the coalition but Huhne and Laws are two of the party’s highest flyers and not easily replaced. Huhne’s estranged wife is writing a book variously described as a “tell all” tome about the minister or a guide to surviving a high-profile divorce. As Huhne’s profile has increased in the last six weeks, she has increasingly spoken out. Last weekend, asked whether he had asked someone to take his driving points, Pryce said: “Yes, he did. But, look, there is such huge pressure on politicians to be everywhere at once, especially early in their career, so that they are visible – huge pressure – and he does drive a bit like a maniac.” This weekend the Mail on Sunday and the Sunday Times reported the phone call between Huhne and a witness. This call is supposed to show Huhne dissuading the witness from letting “the genie” out of the bottle. The other person on the line at one point allegedly expresses concerns that they might have to lie to reporters. “It is one of the things that worried me when you made me take the points.” According to reports, Huhne said: “There is no evidence for this story unless you give it some legs by saying something. The last thing you want is a half-baked story saying you’ve taken points for me.” Huhne is said to have added: “The story they are trying to stand up is that ‘Cabinet minister persuaded XXX to take points’. The only way they can stand that up is by getting you to talk to them. There is simply no other person who could possibly tell them whether it is true or not.” The Sunday Times published the allegation that Huhne allegedly “entered another person’s name on the form, without consulting them”. Its report included the suggestion that that person would be able to provide proof that they were elsewhere that day: “The person Huhne allegedly identified as the driver was at work in central London on the day in question and attended a high-profile conference.” Chris Huhne Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sony just announced that the phased restoration of the crisis-hit PlayStation Network (PSN) has begun now which implies that the PSN restoration process in being carried out in some parts of the world in phases. Reportedly, the Phase I restoration process is in full swing and has already been implemented in California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Technology Nerd Discovery Date : 15/05/2011 03:18 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Gaddafi ex-loyalist is black box of regime, say Libyan officials as UK military calls for more air strikes despite deadly hostel hit A network of Libyan defectors, including the former regime stalwart Moussa
Continue reading …At least 13 people killed as troops clash with demonstrators in Gaza and on the borders with Syria and Lebanon Thousands of Palestinians and their supporters were embroiled in deadly confrontations with the Israeli army as protests erupting across the Palestinian territories, Israel and its borders with Syria, Lebanon and Jordan were met with live fire, rubber bullets, stun grenades and teargas. At least 13 people were reported killed in a day of bloody confrontations, including 10 at the Lebanese border, at least two at the Syrian border and one in Gaza. However some sources said 10 people had been killed on the Syrian border. Police also fired teargas to disperse hundreds of protesters on the Jordanian border. Although Israel had been braced for violent protests, the clashes on its borders were largely unexpected. Israeli politicians, already deeply alarmed about uprisings in its neighbouring Arab countries, now face heightened tensions with Syria and Lebanon. Thousands of Palestinian refugees from Syria marched towards the village of Majdal Shams in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in 1967. According to the Israeli military “hundreds of Syrian rioters infiltrated the Israeli-Syrian border … and violently rioted against [Israeli] forces”. It said its troops “fired selectively towards rioters”. “The Israeli army warned [the protesters] not to cross but they didn’t listen,” Shefa Abu Jabal, 25, a resident of Majdal Shams, said. “When the crowd started to come over … soldiers started shooting. “Around 200 have managed to get across. I’ve heard there are four people dead on this side and there are many more injured. People in the village are really scared. The Israel soldiers looked shocked. No one thought there would be trouble at this border.” Another resident, Hamad Awidat, said: “There are thousands and thousands of people on the Syrian border who are trying to cross. There has been a lot of fighting, and of course people are scared.” At Maroun ar Ras in southern Lebanon, Israeli troops opened fire after hundreds of protesters broke through Lebanese army barricades to throw rocks across the border. At least two people were killed. One man, apparently shot in the chest, was doused with water as protesters tried to revive him but shouts of “Allah Akhbar” broke out as his dead body was lifted over the crowd. One protester, his clothes soaked in blood, screamed: “Murderers, cowards, is a rock any match for a bullet?” Hezbollah, which controls Lebanon’s southern villages had given tacit support for the protest but the crowd was dispersed by Lebanese troops firing into the air. Yassir Ali, one of the protest organisers said the deaths were not unexpected. “Palestinian people are used to paying with their lives. It’s a big price, but one we are prepared to pay to prove our right to return to the motherland.” Brigadier General Yoav Mordechai, an Israeli military spokesman, said soldiers fired when demonstrators began vandalising the border fence. The army was “aware” of casualties, he said. UN peacekeepers on the Lebanese side of the border appealed for “maximum restraint” to prevent casualties. The Israeli security forces had deployed about 10,000 troops and police along the country’s borders and in the Palestinian territories. The West Bank was subject to a 24-hour closure, with only emergency access permitted. Confrontations were reported after about 600 people marched from the West Bank’s principal city, Ramallah, towards the Qalandia checkpoint into Jerusalem. There were also clashes in other areas of the West Bank. In Gaza, at least 80 people were injured after Israeli troops opened fire on demonstrators approaching the Erez border crossing, Palestinian medical sources said. The Israeli military said it shot dead a man trying to plant a bomb near the border. In Tel Aviv, an Israeli man was killed and 17 people were injured when a truck ran into vehicles and pedestrians. It was not clear whether it was an accident or a deliberate attack. The truck’s 22-year-old Israeli-Arab driver said he lost control of the vehicle due to faulty brakes. • Additional reporting: Phoebe Greenwood Israel Arab and Middle East unrest Middle East Palestinian territories Syria Lebanon Harriet Sherwood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …