Home » Archives by category » News (Page 3337)
Number of women appointed to FTSE 100 boards doubles

Despite jump since Lord Davies issued 25% target, proportion of executives who are female is barely above 13% Britain’s biggest companies have more than doubled the number of women they are appointing to boardroom jobs since Lord Davies, the government’s champion of female board representation, told businesses this year that within four years a quarter of senior bosses should be women. FTSE 100 companies have recruited 23 women to their boards this year – representing about 30% of total board appointments – after Davies said they should sign up to a voluntary target of 25% board representation by 2015. The data was collected by the Cranfield School of Management. This year’s recruitments mark a jump on the 18 women appointed to FTSE 100 boards made for the whole of 2010, representing 13.3% of last year’s total. In another sign of progress, the number of blue-chip companies without a single woman on their boards has fallen to 14, down from 21 last December . The appointments include Lucinda Bell, who became British Land’s finance director in March, and Elizabeth Doherty, appointed chief financial officer at consumer goods group Reckitt Benckiser in February. Baroness Vadera of Holland Park, a former business minister, has taken independent non-executive directorships at pharmaceuticals company AstraZeneca and BHP Billiton, the mining group. However, Cranfield points out that despite this year’s jump, still only 13.9% of FTSE 100 board positions are held by women – or 152 out of 1,086 seats – compared with 12.5% in December. Female board representation in the FTSE 250 is still low, at 8.7% (up from 7.8% in December). Lord Davies of Abersoch welcomed the leap in FTSE 100 board representation but said there was “a danger that the issue becomes forgotten”. He said he was working with business secretary Vince Cable and the prime minister’s office on “ways to keep the pressure up”. In February, Davies told FTSE 350 companies to set their own “challenging targets” and called on chairmen to announce their goals within six months and for chief executives to review the percentage of women they aim to have on their executive committees in 2013 and 2015. “We are making progress but we have to make sure all companies publish their targets in the autumn. Even though it is voluntary, I have written to every company secretary laying out what we are expecting and I am getting letters from boards saying they are going to comply.” He added: “Post August, I intend to make sure I keep the pressure up and there is going to be a bit of naming and shaming of companies not supporting it… There will be an event in the autumn that will make the corporate sector realise the government has not forgotten,” Davies said. “All members of the government want to make sure that companies realise this is not just about publication of the report, but about a long-term transformation of the boardroom. This is a continuous issue that’s not going to go away.” However, he said he had no plans to introduce mandatory quotas, which many women oppose as it could create a perception that they have been hired only because of their sex. Cable said: “These figures are good news. However, we still need to see more women appointed to senior decision-making positions in our largest companies. I strongly urge all chairman to publish their aims by September of this year.” Dr Ruth Sealy, Cranfield’s deputy director of the international centre for women leaders, described her latest female board figures as “very, very encouraging” and “pretty much entirely down to the Davies report”. She added that the recent appointment of Christine Lagarde as the IMF’s first female head “can only be a good thing”. Lagarde has backed quotas as the only way of forcing change. Corporate governance Equality Gender Tom Bawden guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

A person familiar with the investigation tells the AP that the Manhattan district attorney’s office will agree to release Dominique Strauss-Kahn without bail. The move comes after serious doubts were raised regarding the credibility of Strauss-Kahn’s accuser, and signals that the accusations of sexual assault may be less serious than…

Continue reading …
Call for Chris Huhne to resign over Fukushima emails

Former party chief executive in Scotland says Huhne must go over ‘conspiracy’ to protect nuclear industry A prominent Liberal Democrat has called for Chris Huhne to resign immediately as energy and climate change secretary after emails were released detailing his officials’ efforts to co-ordinate a PR response to the Fukushima disaster with the nuclear industry . Civil servants in the energy and business departments were apparently trying to minimise the impact of the disaster on public support for nuclear power. Andy Myles, the party’s former chief executive in Scotland, said: “This deliberate and (sadly) very effective attempt to ‘calm’ the reporting of the true story of Fukushima is a terrible betrayal of liberal values. In my view it is not acceptable that a Liberal Democrat cabinet minister presides over a department deeply involved in a blatant conspiracy designed to manipulate the truth in order to protect corporate interests”. The leader of the Lib Dems in the European parliament, Fiona Hall, said nuclear plans should be put on hold. “These emails corroborate my own impression that there has been a strange silence in the UK following the Fukushima disaster … in the UK, new nuclear sites have been announced before the results of the Europe-wide review of nuclear safety has been completed. Today’s news strengthens the case for the government to halt new nuclear plans until an independent and transparent review has been conducted.” Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Nuclear power Energy Japan disaster Rob Edwards guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Call for Chris Huhne to resign over Fukushima emails

Former party chief executive in Scotland says Huhne must go over ‘conspiracy’ to protect nuclear industry A prominent Liberal Democrat has called for Chris Huhne to resign immediately as energy and climate change secretary after emails were released detailing his officials’ efforts to co-ordinate a PR response to the Fukushima disaster with the nuclear industry . Civil servants in the energy and business departments were apparently trying to minimise the impact of the disaster on public support for nuclear power. Andy Myles, the party’s former chief executive in Scotland, said: “This deliberate and (sadly) very effective attempt to ‘calm’ the reporting of the true story of Fukushima is a terrible betrayal of liberal values. In my view it is not acceptable that a Liberal Democrat cabinet minister presides over a department deeply involved in a blatant conspiracy designed to manipulate the truth in order to protect corporate interests”. The leader of the Lib Dems in the European parliament, Fiona Hall, said nuclear plans should be put on hold. “These emails corroborate my own impression that there has been a strange silence in the UK following the Fukushima disaster … in the UK, new nuclear sites have been announced before the results of the Europe-wide review of nuclear safety has been completed. Today’s news strengthens the case for the government to halt new nuclear plans until an independent and transparent review has been conducted.” Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Nuclear power Energy Japan disaster Rob Edwards guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Moroccan voters set to back king’s new constitution

New constitution the monarch’s response to demands for greater freedoms resulting from the Middle East unrest Moroccans voted on Friday on whether to adopt a new constitution that the king has championed as an answer to demands for greater freedoms – but that protesters say will still leave the monarch firmly in control. The referendum on the constitution is near certain to result in a resounding yes vote, like all past referendums in this North African country and generally throughout the Arab world. It is buoyed by a huge media and government campaign, and is seen by some as a way to tentatively open up Moroccan politics, while heading off the kind of tumultuous regime change seen elsewhere in the region. Some voters at the country’s nearly 40,000 polling stations described the ballot as a vote of confidence in King Mohammed VI, a 47-year-old who assumed the throne in 1999 and is seen as a relatively modern monarch. Preliminary results are expected after polls close Friday night. A popular tourist destination, the generally stable, Muslim kingdom is a staunch US ally in a strategic swath of northern Africa that has suffered terrorist attacks – and in recent months, popular uprisings against autocratic regimes. Morocco, like the rest of the Middle East, was swept by pro-democracy demonstrations at the beginning of the year, protesting a lack of freedoms, weak economy and political corruption. The king, however, seems to have managed the popular disaffection by presenting a new constitution that guarantees the rights of women and minorities, and increases the powers of the parliament and judiciary, ostensibly at the expense of his own. Protests have continued nevertheless, and the 20 February pro-democracy movement has called for a boycott. It insists that the new constitution leaves the king firmly in power and will be little different from its predecessor. Their voices have been drowned out as nearly every political party, newspaper and television station has for the past several weeks pressed for Moroccans to vote in favour of the constitution. The monarch was among those voting, casting his ballot in a chic Rabat neighbourhood and, like every other voter, his voting card and ID were checked against the list. He voted with his brother, Prince Moulay Rachid. Crowds were small but steady at voting stations in a working class neighbourhood of Sale, outside the capital, Rabat. Voters were given two pieces of paper – one for a yes vote and one for a no vote – and placed one in an envelope which they put into the urn. The yes ballot was white, and the no ballot light blue, so that illiterate voters could participate. In the Moroccan countryside, voter turnout was stronger in the morning, before a searing heat descended. Officials at different voting stations said turnout was around 25% to 35% by late morning. Cafile Roqiya, a 54-year-old in glasses and a headscarf in the town of Benslimane, said she was voting yes “because there has been much progress”. “It is much better than before. The king keeps us stable and at peace amidst much upheaval,” she said. On the eve of the referendum, a pro-democracy demonstration of a few hundred people was swamped by thousands of government supporters who had been bussed in for the occasion wearing matching T-shirts supporting the constitution. The activists had to take refuge in a gas station under the protection of police while they were hounded by raucous pro-government demonstrators who threw eggs at them and called them “traitors” and “agents”. During the weekly prayers on 24 June, imams in the mosque read out sermons issued by the government urging Moroccans to vote yes as an act of faith. In cities around the country, banners paid for by local merchants exhort people to come out and vote, a practice seen throughout the Arab world when governments call a referendum and local businessmen want to stay in the good graces of officialdom. Most observers agree that the real signs of change for Morocco will come with how the new constitution is implemented. “We say yes to the constitution, but how it turns out in practice, well that’s another struggle,” said Saadeddin al-Othmani, a top official in the Islamist Development and Justice party, which like most political parties supports the new constitution. Al-Othmani sees it as a beginning of reform and Morocco’s own way of responding to the Arab Spring – not by toppling their leader or repressing the people, but through gradual measures. The February 20 movement, and the groups that support it, including smaller labour unions, leftist parties and the country’s banned Justice and Charity Islamist movement, lack al-Othmani’s faith in the process. They see the king’s 9 March speech and three-month consultation period before the new constitution was presented 17 June as the latest in a long line of cosmetic touches to an absolute monarchy. “We want to liberate the country from the state’s monopoly on politics and economy,” said Mohammed Lekrari, a leader of the Democratic Confederation of Labour, a union representing around 800,000 public sector workers. “We would like to leave the Middle Ages.” There is a whiff of medieval in the frenzied hype around the need for a yes vote, says his colleague Othmane Baqa, because a vote for a constitution is being seen as a vote for the king – like the oath of allegiance, the “baya,” given to Muslim kings for hundreds of years and still practiced annually in Morocco. “They want this baya through the referendum, so all Morocco must swear allegiance,” he said. “It becomes a vote for unity and the king.” Morocco Arab and Middle East unrest Africa guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Moroccan voters set to back king’s new constitution

New constitution the monarch’s response to demands for greater freedoms resulting from the Middle East unrest Moroccans voted on Friday on whether to adopt a new constitution that the king has championed as an answer to demands for greater freedoms – but that protesters say will still leave the monarch firmly in control. The referendum on the constitution is near certain to result in a resounding yes vote, like all past referendums in this North African country and generally throughout the Arab world. It is buoyed by a huge media and government campaign, and is seen by some as a way to tentatively open up Moroccan politics, while heading off the kind of tumultuous regime change seen elsewhere in the region. Some voters at the country’s nearly 40,000 polling stations described the ballot as a vote of confidence in King Mohammed VI, a 47-year-old who assumed the throne in 1999 and is seen as a relatively modern monarch. Preliminary results are expected after polls close Friday night. A popular tourist destination, the generally stable, Muslim kingdom is a staunch US ally in a strategic swath of northern Africa that has suffered terrorist attacks – and in recent months, popular uprisings against autocratic regimes. Morocco, like the rest of the Middle East, was swept by pro-democracy demonstrations at the beginning of the year, protesting a lack of freedoms, weak economy and political corruption. The king, however, seems to have managed the popular disaffection by presenting a new constitution that guarantees the rights of women and minorities, and increases the powers of the parliament and judiciary, ostensibly at the expense of his own. Protests have continued nevertheless, and the 20 February pro-democracy movement has called for a boycott. It insists that the new constitution leaves the king firmly in power and will be little different from its predecessor. Their voices have been drowned out as nearly every political party, newspaper and television station has for the past several weeks pressed for Moroccans to vote in favour of the constitution. The monarch was among those voting, casting his ballot in a chic Rabat neighbourhood and, like every other voter, his voting card and ID were checked against the list. He voted with his brother, Prince Moulay Rachid. Crowds were small but steady at voting stations in a working class neighbourhood of Sale, outside the capital, Rabat. Voters were given two pieces of paper – one for a yes vote and one for a no vote – and placed one in an envelope which they put into the urn. The yes ballot was white, and the no ballot light blue, so that illiterate voters could participate. In the Moroccan countryside, voter turnout was stronger in the morning, before a searing heat descended. Officials at different voting stations said turnout was around 25% to 35% by late morning. Cafile Roqiya, a 54-year-old in glasses and a headscarf in the town of Benslimane, said she was voting yes “because there has been much progress”. “It is much better than before. The king keeps us stable and at peace amidst much upheaval,” she said. On the eve of the referendum, a pro-democracy demonstration of a few hundred people was swamped by thousands of government supporters who had been bussed in for the occasion wearing matching T-shirts supporting the constitution. The activists had to take refuge in a gas station under the protection of police while they were hounded by raucous pro-government demonstrators who threw eggs at them and called them “traitors” and “agents”. During the weekly prayers on 24 June, imams in the mosque read out sermons issued by the government urging Moroccans to vote yes as an act of faith. In cities around the country, banners paid for by local merchants exhort people to come out and vote, a practice seen throughout the Arab world when governments call a referendum and local businessmen want to stay in the good graces of officialdom. Most observers agree that the real signs of change for Morocco will come with how the new constitution is implemented. “We say yes to the constitution, but how it turns out in practice, well that’s another struggle,” said Saadeddin al-Othmani, a top official in the Islamist Development and Justice party, which like most political parties supports the new constitution. Al-Othmani sees it as a beginning of reform and Morocco’s own way of responding to the Arab Spring – not by toppling their leader or repressing the people, but through gradual measures. The February 20 movement, and the groups that support it, including smaller labour unions, leftist parties and the country’s banned Justice and Charity Islamist movement, lack al-Othmani’s faith in the process. They see the king’s 9 March speech and three-month consultation period before the new constitution was presented 17 June as the latest in a long line of cosmetic touches to an absolute monarchy. “We want to liberate the country from the state’s monopoly on politics and economy,” said Mohammed Lekrari, a leader of the Democratic Confederation of Labour, a union representing around 800,000 public sector workers. “We would like to leave the Middle Ages.” There is a whiff of medieval in the frenzied hype around the need for a yes vote, says his colleague Othmane Baqa, because a vote for a constitution is being seen as a vote for the king – like the oath of allegiance, the “baya,” given to Muslim kings for hundreds of years and still practiced annually in Morocco. “They want this baya through the referendum, so all Morocco must swear allegiance,” he said. “It becomes a vote for unity and the king.” Morocco Arab and Middle East unrest Africa guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Klitschko Vs Haye

Klitschko vs Haye vor dem Wiegen in Karstadt BET3000.COM Quoten-Tipps für Anfang Juli 2011 Klitschko Vs Haye Prediction Seckbach says: Video: Klitschko vs Haye at their official weigh-in #boxing http://t.co/Wl3swcU

Continue reading …
Nadal to Face Djokovic in Wimbledon Final

Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic advanced to the men’s Wimbledon championship on Friday. The match features the newly crowned World No. 1 against the former top ranked player in the world. (July 1):

Continue reading …
Nadal to Face Djokovic in Wimbledon Final

Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic advanced to the men’s Wimbledon championship on Friday. The match features the newly crowned World No. 1 against the former top ranked player in the world. (July 1):

Continue reading …
Rush Limbaugh: You Can’t Call Obama D-word on MSNBC But You Can Call Conservatives ‘Racist, Sexist, Bigot Homophobes’

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh had more fun Friday with what Mark Halperin said on “Morning Joe” the previous day. In Limbaugh's view, you can't call Obama the D-word on MSNBC, but you can debase conservatives however you want including saying they're “racist, sexist, bigot homophobes” (video follows with transcript and commentary, minor vulgarity warning): RUSH LIMBAUGH: Now, the White House says that that remark was inappropriate. The White House says it's inappropriate. White House spokesman, Mr. Claire Shipman, Jay Carney said that “the comment was an inappropriate thing to say about any president,” except George W. Bush. Well, he didn't really say that, but you know damn well if Halperin had called Bush that name they wouldn't even have apologized. “White House spokesman Jay Carney said the comment was an inappropriate thing to say about any president. Carney also said he had expressed that sentiment to network executives. Halperin quickly apologized on the air Thursday. MSNBC suspended him indefinitely hours later. MSNBC also said Halperin's comment was completely inappropriate and unacceptable. The network apologized to Obama.” So let's take a look here. The word “dick” inappropriate. But the Republicans will hurt disabled kids is totally permissible. The Republicans will hurt college kids. The Republicans will take food out of old people's mouths. Totally appropriate. The Republicans want to take Social Security checks away from old people, totally appropriate. Paul Ryan will push your grandmother to her death over a cliff in a wheelchair, totally appropriate. The rich are selfish, mean-spirited, extremist racists, totally appropriate to say. Conservatives are racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes, totally appropriate to say. It is totally appropriate to make up quotes I never said and attribute them to me. It's totally appropriate for left-wing sportswriters to invent things I never said, that's totally appropriate. As NewsBusters reported Thursday, on MSNBC you can also call a sitting president “a murderous' 'fascist' even muse about putting the President on trial for war crimes, so long as that president is a Republican.” And, as Limbaugh pointed out Thursday, you can also call the President the D-word on MSNBC as long as he's Republican. But you better not do it if he's a Democrat.

Continue reading …