Home » Archives by category » News (Page 3336)
Raw Video: Panetta Takes Over at Pentagon

On his first day as Pentagon chief, Leon Panetta said his top priorities are preserving US military power despite budget cuts, defeating al-Qaida, stabilizing Afghanistan and forging a “real and lasting partnership” with Iraq. (July 1)

Continue reading …
Huge Wildfire Less of Threat to Los Alamos

The threat of wildfire reaching the Los Alamos nuclear lab and the town that surrounds it eased as crews made progress under cloud cover and rain Friday. The fire has blackened more than 162 square miles. (July 1)

Continue reading …
Huge Wildfire Less of Threat to Los Alamos

The threat of wildfire reaching the Los Alamos nuclear lab and the town that surrounds it eased as crews made progress under cloud cover and rain Friday. The fire has blackened more than 162 square miles. (July 1)

Continue reading …
What’s Next for ‘Voice’ Winner Javier Colon?

Javier Colon was crowned the inaugural winner of “The Voice,” NBC’s new singing contest. The soulful crooner discusses what the future may hold for him and his devoted coach Adam Levine. (July 1)

Continue reading …
What’s Next for ‘Voice’ Winner Javier Colon?

Javier Colon was crowned the inaugural winner of “The Voice,” NBC’s new singing contest. The soulful crooner discusses what the future may hold for him and his devoted coach Adam Levine. (July 1)

Continue reading …

As Republicans continue to posture over the debt ceiling, the idea of going over Congress’ head and invoking the 14th amendment as basis to raise it automatically is gaining traction. Here’s the latest shenanigans from Republicans. After the President took them to task for taking off on vacation, Mitch McConnell issued an invitation for President Obama to meet with Republicans, but not to negotiate. No, McConnell wanted Mr. Obama to come into the room so he could ” hear directly ” why he will never get what he’s asking for. “I’d like to invite the president to come to the Capitol today to meet with Senate Republicans — any time this afternoon, if he’s available, to come on up to the Capitol,” McConnell said. “ That way he can hear directly from Senate Republicans … why what he’s proposing will not pass .” You may have heard about the “14th amendment option”, a sort of nuclear option for the executive to completely bypass Congress and rely on the language in the 14th amendment to render any legislative action on the debt ceiling moot. If you haven’t, watch the segment in the video at the top of this post where it’s explained pretty thoroughly. It’s an untested concept, but rooted in some really strong history. I cannot recommend this post enough for the backstory and history around the adoption of Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. When I first heard about this I was completely confused as to how language about the public debt became part of a constitutional amendment, which is why you really must read the post on Balkanization. Here’s a snippet: What do we learn from this history? If Wade’s speech offers the central rationale for Section Four, the goal was to remove threats of default on federal debts from partisan struggle. Reconstruction Republicans feared that Democrats, once admitted to Congress would use their majorities to default on obligations they did disliked politically. More generally, as Wade explained, “every man who has property in the public funds will feel safer when he sees that the national debt is withdrawn from the power of a Congress to repudiate it and placed under the guardianship of the Constitution than he would feel if it were left at loose ends and subject to the varying majorities which may arise in Congress.” Well, now. That seems to lend itself to a place in this Very Serious Discussion of the Very Serious Republicans to blow up the world economy for Very Partisan Reasons. Jon Chait : This means that the very existence of the debt limit is unconstitutional because it calls into question the validity of the debt. So would any other provision of law. That is a key reason why Congress created a permanent appropriation for interest payments at the same time that the Fourteenth Amendment was debated. Previously, Congress had to pass annual appropriations for interest. It goes without saying that provoking a constitutional crisis over the debt limit is a bad idea, but a debt crisis would be worse. At a minimum, the Fourteenth Amendment greatly strengthens the president’s hand in getting the debt limit increased in a timely matter. He should not be afraid to use it. Chait is gnawing around the edges of the benefits of this strategy. Let’s just say it outright. The administration has set a drop-dead date of July 22nd to get this done. Assuming Republicans keep their petulant sad faces and refuse to negotiate in any faith, much less good faith, all the White House has to do is remind them that they’re irrelevant by reminding the global bond markets that they’re irrelevant. Suddenly the hostage is breathing just a little bit easier and Republicans look like the fools that they are. We know this will spin away from the President in the media. He will be painted by sniveling Republicans as a bully and a despot. But for everyone who doesn’t want the administration to cave on Medicare and Social Security, I note that the bully pulpit was used quite successfully yesterday (despite the cries and whimpers about scoldings and the like) and the administration’s surrogates are speaking out forcefully about the usefulness of the 14th amendment solution, so it would seem to be in our benefit to have their backs on this one. It’s certainly gotten more interesting with this on the table. I’m suddenly having fun watching Mitch McConnell and John Boehner tilt at windmills.

Continue reading …

As Republicans continue to posture over the debt ceiling, the idea of going over Congress’ head and invoking the 14th amendment as basis to raise it automatically is gaining traction. Here’s the latest shenanigans from Republicans. After the President took them to task for taking off on vacation, Mitch McConnell issued an invitation for President Obama to meet with Republicans, but not to negotiate. No, McConnell wanted Mr. Obama to come into the room so he could ” hear directly ” why he will never get what he’s asking for. “I’d like to invite the president to come to the Capitol today to meet with Senate Republicans — any time this afternoon, if he’s available, to come on up to the Capitol,” McConnell said. “ That way he can hear directly from Senate Republicans … why what he’s proposing will not pass .” You may have heard about the “14th amendment option”, a sort of nuclear option for the executive to completely bypass Congress and rely on the language in the 14th amendment to render any legislative action on the debt ceiling moot. If you haven’t, watch the segment in the video at the top of this post where it’s explained pretty thoroughly. It’s an untested concept, but rooted in some really strong history. I cannot recommend this post enough for the backstory and history around the adoption of Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment: The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. When I first heard about this I was completely confused as to how language about the public debt became part of a constitutional amendment, which is why you really must read the post on Balkanization. Here’s a snippet: What do we learn from this history? If Wade’s speech offers the central rationale for Section Four, the goal was to remove threats of default on federal debts from partisan struggle. Reconstruction Republicans feared that Democrats, once admitted to Congress would use their majorities to default on obligations they did disliked politically. More generally, as Wade explained, “every man who has property in the public funds will feel safer when he sees that the national debt is withdrawn from the power of a Congress to repudiate it and placed under the guardianship of the Constitution than he would feel if it were left at loose ends and subject to the varying majorities which may arise in Congress.” Well, now. That seems to lend itself to a place in this Very Serious Discussion of the Very Serious Republicans to blow up the world economy for Very Partisan Reasons. Jon Chait : This means that the very existence of the debt limit is unconstitutional because it calls into question the validity of the debt. So would any other provision of law. That is a key reason why Congress created a permanent appropriation for interest payments at the same time that the Fourteenth Amendment was debated. Previously, Congress had to pass annual appropriations for interest. It goes without saying that provoking a constitutional crisis over the debt limit is a bad idea, but a debt crisis would be worse. At a minimum, the Fourteenth Amendment greatly strengthens the president’s hand in getting the debt limit increased in a timely matter. He should not be afraid to use it. Chait is gnawing around the edges of the benefits of this strategy. Let’s just say it outright. The administration has set a drop-dead date of July 22nd to get this done. Assuming Republicans keep their petulant sad faces and refuse to negotiate in any faith, much less good faith, all the White House has to do is remind them that they’re irrelevant by reminding the global bond markets that they’re irrelevant. Suddenly the hostage is breathing just a little bit easier and Republicans look like the fools that they are. We know this will spin away from the President in the media. He will be painted by sniveling Republicans as a bully and a despot. But for everyone who doesn’t want the administration to cave on Medicare and Social Security, I note that the bully pulpit was used quite successfully yesterday (despite the cries and whimpers about scoldings and the like) and the administration’s surrogates are speaking out forcefully about the usefulness of the 14th amendment solution, so it would seem to be in our benefit to have their backs on this one. It’s certainly gotten more interesting with this on the table. I’m suddenly having fun watching Mitch McConnell and John Boehner tilt at windmills.

Continue reading …
Facebook, Hulu partnership accidentally clicks ‘security breach’ instead of ‘Like’

Even though there’s a For Sale sign in the window Hulu isn’t taking a break and today it unveiled a new partnership with Facebook to make its library of TV shows and movies more social. Adding Facebook Connect (competitor Netflix may be on the board , but it’s still working on adding the button ) should let the social network log you in, customize things based on preferences from you and your friends, and share time-coded likes and comments. Unfortunately what actually happened for some users was that they were suddenly given access to someone else’s Facebook account, a problem documented by both AVRev and NewTeeVee . According to a second blog post, due to approximately 50 users being affected Hulu has shut down the program, required everyone to log in again and cranked privacy settings to the highest for anyone who logged in while it was on. Of course, with rumors from the LA Times that Google (along with Microsoft and Yahoo) is interested in purchasing the service, maybe they can get an invite to the Google+ party and forget the whole thing ever happened Facebook, Hulu partnership accidentally clicks ‘security breach’ instead of ‘Like’ originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:03:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …

Billionaire Francois-Henri Pinault has a 4-year-old daughter with wife Salma Hayek … and now the New York Post confirms that he also has a 4-year-old son with supermodel Linda Evangelista. Pinault, long rumored to be Evangelista’s babydaddy , apparently fathered little Augustin James while separated from then-girlfriend Hayek in 2006. Hayek and…

Continue reading …
Number of women appointed to FTSE 100 boards doubles

Despite jump since Lord Davies issued 25% target, proportion of executives who are female is barely above 13% Britain’s biggest companies have more than doubled the number of women they are appointing to boardroom jobs since Lord Davies, the government’s champion of female board representation, told businesses this year that within four years a quarter of senior bosses should be women. FTSE 100 companies have recruited 23 women to their boards this year – representing about 30% of total board appointments – after Davies said they should sign up to a voluntary target of 25% board representation by 2015. The data was collected by the Cranfield School of Management. This year’s recruitments mark a jump on the 18 women appointed to FTSE 100 boards made for the whole of 2010, representing 13.3% of last year’s total. In another sign of progress, the number of blue-chip companies without a single woman on their boards has fallen to 14, down from 21 last December . The appointments include Lucinda Bell, who became British Land’s finance director in March, and Elizabeth Doherty, appointed chief financial officer at consumer goods group Reckitt Benckiser in February. Baroness Vadera of Holland Park, a former business minister, has taken independent non-executive directorships at pharmaceuticals company AstraZeneca and BHP Billiton, the mining group. However, Cranfield points out that despite this year’s jump, still only 13.9% of FTSE 100 board positions are held by women – or 152 out of 1,086 seats – compared with 12.5% in December. Female board representation in the FTSE 250 is still low, at 8.7% (up from 7.8% in December). Lord Davies of Abersoch welcomed the leap in FTSE 100 board representation but said there was “a danger that the issue becomes forgotten”. He said he was working with business secretary Vince Cable and the prime minister’s office on “ways to keep the pressure up”. In February, Davies told FTSE 350 companies to set their own “challenging targets” and called on chairmen to announce their goals within six months and for chief executives to review the percentage of women they aim to have on their executive committees in 2013 and 2015. “We are making progress but we have to make sure all companies publish their targets in the autumn. Even though it is voluntary, I have written to every company secretary laying out what we are expecting and I am getting letters from boards saying they are going to comply.” He added: “Post August, I intend to make sure I keep the pressure up and there is going to be a bit of naming and shaming of companies not supporting it… There will be an event in the autumn that will make the corporate sector realise the government has not forgotten,” Davies said. “All members of the government want to make sure that companies realise this is not just about publication of the report, but about a long-term transformation of the boardroom. This is a continuous issue that’s not going to go away.” However, he said he had no plans to introduce mandatory quotas, which many women oppose as it could create a perception that they have been hired only because of their sex. Cable said: “These figures are good news. However, we still need to see more women appointed to senior decision-making positions in our largest companies. I strongly urge all chairman to publish their aims by September of this year.” Dr Ruth Sealy, Cranfield’s deputy director of the international centre for women leaders, described her latest female board figures as “very, very encouraging” and “pretty much entirely down to the Davies report”. She added that the recent appointment of Christine Lagarde as the IMF’s first female head “can only be a good thing”. Lagarde has backed quotas as the only way of forcing change. Corporate governance Equality Gender Tom Bawden guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …