A poll commissioned last Thursday by the inside-the-Beltway political newspaper The Hill finds that “[l]ikely voters hold a dismal view of the news media, generally regarding reporters as biased, unethical and too close to the politicians they purport to cover.” Hill reporter Niall Stanage noted that the poll shows “68 percent of voters consider the news media biased” with “[m]ost, 46 percent, believ[ing] the media generally favor Democrats.” What's more, fully 44 percent of voters polled “believe the media are too friendly with politicians.” Also of note, nearly 4 out of 10 of self-described centrists see the bias as skewed in favor of Democrats, while only 19 percent of moderates think the media favor Republicans. For the full story at TheHill.com, click here .
Continue reading …With the $14.3 billion potential default just nine days away, markets are growing increasingly spooked by the rising danger, reports the Telegraph . “We may have a few stressful days coming up—stressful for the markets of the world and the American people,” said White House chief of staff Bill…
Continue reading …Judge extends injunction brought by ‘world-famous celebrity’ to keep details of sexual relationship with former escort secret The high court has extended a gagging order obtained by a leading actor to prevent reporting of his “sexual relationship” with a former escort girl. The married actor, described by judge Mr Justice King as a “world-famous celebrity”, brought a privacy injunction to stop Helen Wood revealing details of his extramarital affair in April. In a judgment handed down on Friday, King agreed to uphold the gagging order but relaxed rules over how he can be identified. The actor – who has admitted to the affair – can now be identified as a “leading actor” and a “world-famous celebrity”, King said in the judgment. The media can also refer to the affair as a “sexual relationship”. The judgment was published online on Friday but was later withdrawn by the court due to copyright issues, it is understood. The judge added: “It seems to me that this is material to the public debate about the class of person who is seeking these injunctions and the status they are seeking to protect when preventing the publication of private sexual encounters.” No anonymity was sought by Wood, who has previously claimed to have slept with Wayne Rooney. Wood had offered information about her relationship with the actor to the Sun. Granting the injunction, King concluded that the actor was “likely to establish that he has a reasonable expectation that that which he does in his private life by way of sexual encounters, albeit with a prostitute, should be kept private”. The judge also pointed out that neither Wood nor the Sun had argued that publishing details about the affair was in the public interest. The injunction is the latest to be heard in the high court following a huge storm over the controversial gagging orders in May and June. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook Privacy & the media Media law Privacy Injunctions Newspapers Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Mitch Winehouse greets mourners outside north London home of singer who died in unexplained circumstances on Saturday Amy Winehouse’s father has greeted mourners laying flowers outside her north London home and thanked her fans for their support and love. Mitch Winehouse spoke to people who were leaving handwritten notes and bouquets in memory of the singer, who died on Saturday, telling them: “This means so much to my family.” The 27-year-old singer, who had a well-documented battle with drugs and alcohol for several years, was found dead at her home in Camden Town by her bodyguard. A postmortem is expected on Monday afternoon, and police have said only that her death is “unexplained” and that speculation regarding an overdose is “inappropriate”. Mitch Winehouse, who flew back from New York immediately after hearing the news of his daughter’s death, told her fans: “I can’t tell you what this means to us – it really is making this a lot easier for us. Amy was about one thing and that was love, her whole life was devoted to her family and her friends and to you guys as well. We’re devastated and I’m speechless but thanks for coming.” He appeared also to address reporters, many of whom he has known for several years. “You’ve got to do what you’ve got to do. I know a lot of you, we’ve been together for five, six years, I know you’ve got a job to do. I’m glad you’re all here anyway,” he said. The impromptu shrine outside her home features photos as well as cards and notes, including an image of Winehouse posing in a bar. There is also a picture amended by artist Mysterious Al, showing her face with monochrome cartoon eyes and a white lightning strike in her beehive hair. One note read: “Too fragile, too beautiful, too big a talent for this world” and another said: “To an exquisite singer with a beautiful voice.” The singer’s family, speaking for the first time on Sunday, said they had been left “bereft” by her death, describing her as “a wonderful daughter, sister, niece”. In a statement they said: “She leaves a gaping hole in our lives. We are coming together to remember her and we would appreciate some privacy and space at this terrible time.” It is understood that her body was formally identified on Monday morning. Scotland Yard said that later on Monday a postmortem examination will take place and an inquest into her death will be opened and adjourned at St Pancras coroners court. Amy Winehouse London Police Alexandra Topping guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Winehouse’s mother: ‘She seemed out of it’; ‘Captain America’ knocks Harry from No. 1 spot; Producers: Kurt, Finn, Rachel not done with ‘Glee’, (July 25)
Continue reading …enlarge If it appears that John Boehner is suffering from multiple personality disorder over the debt ceiling stand-off , that’s because he is. Torn between his duty to the national interest as Speaker of the House and to the Tea Party caucus that put him there, for months Boehner has ping-ponged between truth and lies on the debt ceiling. Long before he breached faith with the President on Friday, John Boehner tried to have it both ways on virtually every aspect of the debt ceiling crisis manufactured by the Republican Party he struggles to lead. As Jed Lewison documented, Speaker Sybil couldn’t get his story straight on Friday’s walkout. While he insisted during his press conference afterward that “we had an agreement on a revenue number,” in a letter that same day to House Republicans Boehner insisted that “A deal was never reached, and was never really close.” As it turns out, John Boehner’s duplicity started long before he picked up the Speaker’s gavel. In the wake of the Republicans’ overwhelming triumph at the polls last fall, Speaker-to-be Boehner was his party’s voice of reason on the debt ceiling. As the Wall Street Journal reported on November 18 (“Boehner Warns GOP on Debt Ceiling”), Boehner pressed his newly enlarged Republican caucus on the need to raise the debt ceiling and so protect the full faith and credit of the United States. “I’ve made it pretty clear to them that as we get into next year, it’s pretty clear that Congress is going to have to deal with this,” Mr. Boehner, who is slated to become House speaker in January, told reporters. “We’re going to have to deal with it as adults,” he said, in what apparently are his most explicit comments to date. “Whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations and we have obligations on our part.” If an increase in the current debt limit of $14.3 trillion does not pass, it would suggest the country may not meet its obligations and would shake the financial system. It could rock the bond market, rattle the dollar and scare away foreign buyers of U.S. debt. In January , Boehner echoed Paul Ryan’s warning that “you can’t not raise the debt ceiling” and Lindsey Graham’s dire prediction that failure to do so would produce “collapse and calamity throughout the world.” As Speaker Boehner put it then: “That would be a financial disaster, not only for our country but for the worldwide economy. Remember, the American people on Election Day said, ‘we want to cut spending and we want to create jobs.’ And you can’t create jobs if you default on the federal debt.” But that same month , Boehner was also insisting President Obama would have to make concessions to Republicans on the debt ceiling that George W. Bush, needless to say, never faced: The American people will not stand for such an increase unless it is accompanied by meaningful action by the President and Congress to cut spending and end the job-killing spending binge in Washington. After bringing the government to the brink of a shutdown over budget cuts demanded by the GOP in April, a newly confident Speaker Boehner made abundantly clear he would join the hardliners in the House and Senate holding the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling hostage. As Politico reported, Boehner set out to prove ” there’s no daylight between the Tea Party and me “: House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), fresh off the budget talks, told donors this weekend that if Obama wants an up or down vote on the debt ceiling he’s not going to get it. “The president says I want you to send me a clean bill,” Boehner said. “Well guess what, Mr. President, not a chance you’re going to get a clean bill.” “There will not be an increase in the debt limit without something really, really big attached to it,” he continued in a clip of his remarks at a fundraiser that was played during “Face the Nation.” That really, really big “something” turned out to be the draconian Paul Ryan budget . After refusing to endorse the Ryan Roadmap during the 2010 campaign, John Boehner joined 234 House Republicans and 40 GOP Senators in voting for the Ryan plan. But Ryan’s blueprint didn’t merely privatize Medicare, slash Medicaid and deliver yet another tax cut windfall for the wealthy; it would also add another $6 trillion in debt over the next decade . As a result, the GOP’s own Ryan budget not only violates the “Cut, Cap and Balance Act” spending targets they just voted for this week. It would also require the Republicans to raise the ceiling repeatedly in the future. In a rare moment of candor, Speaker John Boehner admitted as much. As Reuters detailed, Speaker Boehner told a gathering of Buckeye state Tea Partiers in April that the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling must be raised now – and not for the last time: The private April 25 meeting was convened by the Speaker of the House of Representatives at the request of Tea Party leaders, who were seething over recent Republican compromises, most notably on the 2011 budget. One of the 25 or so leaders, all from Boehner’s district, asked him if Republicans would raise America’s $14.3 trillion debt limit. According to half a dozen attendees interviewed by Reuters, the most powerful Republican in Washington said “yes.” “And we’re going to have to raise it again in the future,” he added. With the mass retirement of America’s Baby Boomers, he explained, it would take 20 years to balance the U.S. budget and 30 years after that to erase the nation’s huge fiscal deficit. If Congress doesn’t raise the debt limit by August 2nd, Speaker Boehner agreed with President Obama that the federal government could not guarantee that Social Security checks would sent out as required. And as Boehner explained just 10 days ago , that’s just the beginning of the dire consequences if the Treasury’s August 2 deadline is missed: “Missing August 2nd could spook the market. And you could have a real catastrophe. Nobody wants that to happen.” As it turns out, that’s precisely what many of his Republican colleagues want to happen. And in late June , Boehner joined the ” default deniers ” claiming the Obama administration’s warnings about that early August deadline were “scare tactics” and “outright blatant lies”: “Dealing with this deficit problem is far more important than meeting some artificial date created by the Treasury secretary.” Of course, John Boehner played a vital role in the creation of the massive national debt he now routinely decries. Leave aside for the moment that Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and increased the debt ceiling 17 times . Forget also George W. Bush nearly doubled the debt or that the Bush tax cuts were the biggest driver of debt over the past decade, and if made permanent, would be continue to be so over the next. Pay no attention to the federal tax burden now at its lowest level in 60 years or income inequality at its highest level in 80 years after a decade of plummeting rates for America’s supposed job creators who don’t create jobs . Ignore for now that Republican majorities voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush and the current GOP leadership team voted a combined 19 times to bump the debt limit $4 trillion during his tenure. Look away from the two unfunded wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the budget-busting Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 and the Medicare prescription drug program because, after all, John Boehner voted for all of it . Alas, that was then and this is now. And now, a Democrat is in the White House. Which means for John Boehner, raising the debt ceiling at all is now a ” concession .” As UPI reported two weeks ago: At a news conference Monday before heading to the White House for a meeting, Boehner said the only Republican concession Obama should expect is a vote raising the federal debt limit itself. “Most Americans would say that a ‘balanced’ approach is a simple one — the administration gets its debt-limit increase and the American people get their spending cuts and their reforms,” he said. “And adding tax increases to the equation doesn’t ‘balance’ anything.” Not, that is, for the unbalanced John Boehner. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …It didn't take long for American media to blame this weekend's tragic shootings in Oslo, Norway, on our nation's conservatives. The New York Times splashed it across its front page Monday with the headline ” Killings Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S. “: The man accused of the killing spree in Norway was deeply influenced by a small group of American bloggers and writers who have warned for years about the threat from Islam, lacing his 1,500-page manifesto with quotations from them, as well as copying multiple passages from the tract of the Unabomber. In the document he posted online, Anders Behring Breivik, who is accused of bombing government buildings and killing scores of young people at a Labor Party camp, showed that he had closely followed the acrimonious American debate over Islam. His manifesto, which denounced Norwegian politicians as failing to defend the country from Islamic influence, quoted Robert Spencer, who operates the Jihad Watch Web site, 64 times, and cited other Western writers who shared his view that Muslim immigrants pose a grave danger to Western culture. Author Scott Shane then mentioned other prominent anti-terrorism websites such as Atlas Shrugs and Gates of Vienna, implying their complicity in this awful event. Yet when a pair of homegrown terrorists were arrested in Seattle last month before a planned attack on a military facility, the Times chose not to inform readers that the duo were Muslim-converts and the ringleader idolized Osama bin Laden. Now, roughly four weeks later, a sadly successful attack happened thousands of miles away, and the Times was more than happy to point fingers – prominently on its front page! – at American conservatives.
Continue reading …Amy Winehouse’s death has left her family “bereft” and struggling to cope with a “gaping hole” in their lives, while the mom of her ex-husband Blake Fielder-Civil fears he may attempt suicide in prison where he’s serving time for burglary and possession of an imitation firearm. “I can’t believe it….
Continue reading …Click here to view this media House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) told Fox News’s Chris Wallace Sunday that any deal to raise the debt ceiling must be within the “cut, cap and balance” framework that has already been rejected by the Senate. “I am going to continue to work with my congressional colleagues in both parties and my House Republican conference to try to develop a framework within the cut, cap and balance effort that the House passed this past week,” Boehner insisted. “I think a preferable path would be a bipartisan plan that involves all of the leaders, but it is too early to decide whether that is possible.” “There will be a two-stage process, it’s just not physically possible to do all of this in one step. Having said that, Chris, I know the president is worried about his next election. But my God, shouldn’t he be worried about the country?” the Speaker wondered. “So are you suggesting you might pass a short-term plan in the House and in effect, dare the Senate, dare the White House to block it?” Wallace asked. “We passed cut, cap and balance,” Boehner said. “But they have been defeated,” Wallace noted. “You talked about putting a framework out today. You are saying you would not do that unless you have Democratic buy-in?” “I would prefer to have a bipartisan approach to solve this problem. If that is not possible, I and my Republican colleagues in the House are prepared to move on our own,” Boehner explained. “I continue to believe that a balanced budget amendment is the greatest enforcement mechanism to bring Washington spending under control,” he later added. Washington Monthly ‘s Steve Benen observed that Boehner’s threat to act alone may show that he is willing to let the country default on its debts. “What Boehner is describing is a path that makes his caucus happy,” Benen wrote. “Boehner’s comments this morning — ‘I and my Republican colleagues are prepared to move on our own’ — sounded a lot like a House leader who’s not even interested in finding a solution at all. His goal is likely to avoid blame, not to resolve the problem.” “In other words, Boehner sees the car headed for the cliff, and appears ready to put a brick on the accelerator,” he concluded.
Continue reading …Four teenage boys are in critical condition after they were attacked by a brown bear sow and her cub as they hiked through the Alaskan wilderness. The four, all between the ages of 16 and 18, were at the head of a group of hiking teenagers of the National Outdoor…
Continue reading …