Monday appeared to be the day that MSNBC commentators bashed the ratings of Sunday political talk shows other than NBC's “Meet the Press.” After Chris Matthews ridiculed ABC's “This Week” despite it having more than three times his audience, Lawrence O'Donnell went after Chris Wallace and “Fox News Sunday” (video follows with transcript and commentary): LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Well, I think, you know, Jon Stewart’s point about Fox News has Chris Wallace on there just so they can say they have him, just so they can say they have a reasonably fair Sunday morning show. It comes in dead last in the ratings. David Gregory just kills it, you know, by a million miles. So it isn't there as a real business. It's just there as a fig leaf for the Fox News people to claim there's a news show Sunday morning. “David Gregory just kills it, you know, by a million miles.” Really? According to TVNewser, “[W]hen the two cable replays on Fox News are taken into consideration, “FNS” draws more viewers than “Face the Nation” or “This Week.” What shills like O'Donnell choose to ignore is that “Fox News Sunday” airs on two different channels: Fox News on cable and regular broadcast Fox. When organizations like Nielsen rank these Sunday shows, they only factor in the broadcast ratings. Add in those watching “FNS” on FNC and it normally comes in first. As “Meet the Press” typically averages about 3.5 million viewers every Sunday, that means “FNS's” combined numbers are greater than this. If O'Donnell thinks this isn't a “real business” model for Fox, what does he think of the roughly 1.5 million viewers he gets each day – 57 percent less than Wallace! – during the combined airings of “The Last Word?” Oh. That's right. MSNBC isn't in this racket to make money. This is liberal advocacy plain and simple no matter the cost – as long as the new owners at Comcast are willing to go along with it, that is.
Continue reading …There's been a lot of talk lately that MSNBC's Chris Matthews is beginning to lose it. As further evidence that the “Hardball” host seems a bit detached from reality, consider that on Monday's program, he referred to ABC's “This Week” as a show “not many people see…It doesn’t get many viewers” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Alright, let’s take a look. Here’s John McCain hitting Romney on Sunday. They're all hitting him from all sides. This is fair. This is personal. McCain doesn’t like Romney. Let's listen. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN (R-ARIZONA): I wish that candidate Romney and all the others would sit down with General Patraeus and understand how this counterinsurgency is working and succeeding. For us to abandon Afghanistan to the tender mercies of the Taliban and radical Islamic extremists I think would be repeating the mistakes we made before. (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Well, not many people see that show on Sunday. Mark, it's called “This Week.” It doesn’t get many viewers, but… It doesn't get many viewers? The Sunday, June 12, installment of “This Week” got 2.197 total viewers and 738,000 in the all-important demographic aged 25 to 54. Compare that to “Hardball” which last Thursday got 626,000 total viewers at 7PM and only 174,000 in the demo. This means that “This Week” got over three times more total viewers and over four times more in the demo. Yet Matthews said, “Not many people see that show.” Makes you wonder how he feels about his own ratings – or do folks at MSNBC not tell him how far he's fallen since he hosted a program people were actually interested in watching way back in the '90s?
Continue reading …There's been a lot of talk lately that MSNBC's Chris Matthews is beginning to lose it. As further evidence that the “Hardball” host seems a bit detached from reality, consider that on Monday's program, he referred to ABC's “This Week” as a show “not many people see…It doesn’t get many viewers” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Alright, let’s take a look. Here’s John McCain hitting Romney on Sunday. They're all hitting him from all sides. This is fair. This is personal. McCain doesn’t like Romney. Let's listen. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN (R-ARIZONA): I wish that candidate Romney and all the others would sit down with General Patraeus and understand how this counterinsurgency is working and succeeding. For us to abandon Afghanistan to the tender mercies of the Taliban and radical Islamic extremists I think would be repeating the mistakes we made before. (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Well, not many people see that show on Sunday. Mark, it's called “This Week.” It doesn’t get many viewers, but… It doesn't get many viewers? The Sunday, June 12, installment of “This Week” got 2.197 total viewers and 738,000 in the all-important demographic aged 25 to 54. Compare that to “Hardball” which last Thursday got 626,000 total viewers at 7PM and only 174,000 in the demo. This means that “This Week” got over three times more total viewers and over four times more in the demo. Yet Matthews said, “Not many people see that show.” Makes you wonder how he feels about his own ratings – or do folks at MSNBC not tell him how far he's fallen since he hosted a program people were actually interested in watching way back in the '90s?
Continue reading …A newly discovered mushroom species has been named after the beloved cartoon, SpongeBob SquarePants. It’s official title: spongiforma squarepantsii. The cartoon seemed like a perfect choice for this fungus that looks more like a sea sponge. It is bright orange (or sometimes purple) and smells “vaguely fruity or strongly musty,” reports MSNBC. (MORE: One Nation Under
Continue reading …Chris Matthews on Monday could barely contain his glee as he recounted a contentious Fox News debate between liberal comic Jon Stewart and Chris Wallace. Regarding Stewart's appearance on Fox News Sunday, Matthews excoriated, ” Coming up, we got a real prize fight here and it's somewhat imbalanced. Jon Stewart smashing his way through Chris Wallace's face to make a point .” Matthews' panel to discuss the segment included David Corn of the leftist Nation magazine and Alex Wagner of Huffington Post. Corn had a bizarre comparison to the heated discussion. After playing a clip of the two arguing over whether Stewart had compared Sarah Palin to herpes, Corn weirdly gushed, ” [Wallace is] up against Mark Twain. Would you get on Mark Twain's case for being tough on slave owners in the south? “
Continue reading …As NewsBusters has been reporting since Monday's Republican presidential debate, MSNBC's Chris Matthews is suddenly a big fan of Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's (R-Minn.). On Saturday's “Fox News Watch,” syndicated columnist Cal Thomas said, “Chris Matthews praises her, which is sort of like getting a civil rights affirmation from David Duke” (video follows with transcript and commentary): JON SCOTT, HOST: That's new Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann striking a cord at a Republican debate earlier this week. Cal, she got some pretty good reviews from the mainstream press, and yet many of those same members of the press were trying to tear her down before the debate. CAL THOMAS: Right, the Left likes to build up people in order to tear them down. One of my favorite lines on this was that she exceeded expectations. Well, who set the expectations? The media did. And then, she got endorsed. Your time is coming. It's actually passed, but we're keeping you here anymore. ALAN COLMES: You would know. THOMAS: Yes, I would. Yes, actually. Chris Matthews praises her, which is sort of like getting a civil rights affirmation from David Duke. COLMES: Let’s attack the liberal media. Oh, come on, it's getting old, will you please? THOMAS: Like you are. COLMES: You’re still older. THOMAS: That’s true, but I’m better. Indeed you are, Cal. Indeed you are. Readers are advised Thomas was given the Media Research Center's “William F. Buckley Jr. Award for Media Excellence” at the MRC’s annual Gala on May 7.
Continue reading …Tatum and Ryan O’Neal Team Up for New Show O’Neal says ‘Bad News Bears’ had an edge that is missing in many modern movies Tatum and Ryan O’Neal Team Up for New Show TheMrMarks says: I liked a @YouTube video from @TacInsertion http://youtu.be/i26Ee29dsCw?a Full Shangri-La Trailer Map Analysis
Continue reading …On the June 14 edition of NBC's “Today,” President Barack Obama ascribed part of the blame for the high unemployment rate to ATMs, yet most media outlets continue to ignore the gaffe. “There are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers,” lectured Obama in an interview with NBC's Ann Curry. “You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM, you don’t go to a bank teller, or you go to the airport and you’re using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.” Curry moved on to another subject without addressing the faux pas, but she's not the only journalist to gloss over the story. Despite the fact that the automated teller machine was invented decades before Obama took office, a Lexis search revealed that not a single major news network, including ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FNC, and MSNBC, has covered the remark on air. Fox Nation linked to the “Today” interview and CNN buried a brief blurb on John King's blog, but other than that the networks have been mum on a story that Red State's Erick Erickson described as demonstrating that Obama “is completely and utterly ignorant about job creation and economics.” While the media give Obama a pass on ATMs, they afforded then-President George H.W. Bush no such luxury during the 1992 presidential campaign, when the Republican incumbent was mocked as out of touch for reportedly marveling at a grocery store scanner. The story was later exposed as “almost wholly untrue,” but that didn't stop former ABC anchor Peter Jennings from reviving the contrived controversy years later on “World News Tonight.” “News for everyone, but former President Bush might take note,” inveighed Jennings on March 31, 2000. “Self-scanning check-out systems are catching on at supermarkets. Customers scan and bag the groceries themselves and then to keep people honest, it checks to see if the weight of the groceries equals the weight of the items which were scanned.” Contrary to the president's assertion that ATMs contribute to nagging unemployment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) predicted that teller jobs would grow about 6 percent from 2008 to 2016. In addition, NRO's Jonah Goldberg pointed to statistics indicating expansive growth in banking jobs since the self-service banking era began in 1985: “At the dawn of the self-service banking age in 1985, for example, the United States had 60,000 automated teller machines and 485,000 bank tellers. In 2002, the United States had 352,000 ATMs – and 527,000 bank tellers.” Adding insult to injury, the ATM Industry Association took a swipe at Obama in an email to the Washington Examiner: “Given these major roles of the ATM, it would be quite irrational to turn the clock back to the 1960s to a time before ATMs.” –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …On the June 14 edition of NBC's “Today,” President Barack Obama ascribed part of the blame for the high unemployment rate to ATMs, yet most media outlets continue to ignore the gaffe. “There are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers,” lectured Obama in an interview with NBC's Ann Curry. “You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM, you don’t go to a bank teller, or you go to the airport and you’re using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.” Curry moved on to another subject without addressing the faux pas, but she's not the only journalist to gloss over the story. Despite the fact that the automated teller machine was invented decades before Obama took office, a Lexis search revealed that not a single major news network, including ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FNC, and MSNBC, has covered the remark on air. Fox Nation linked to the “Today” interview and CNN buried a brief blurb on John King's blog, but other than that the networks have been mum on a story that Red State's Erick Erickson described as demonstrating that Obama “is completely and utterly ignorant about job creation and economics.” While the media give Obama a pass on ATMs, they afforded then-President George H.W. Bush no such luxury during the 1992 presidential campaign, when the Republican incumbent was mocked as out of touch for reportedly marveling at a grocery store scanner. The story was later exposed as “almost wholly untrue,” but that didn't stop former ABC anchor Peter Jennings from reviving the contrived controversy years later on “World News Tonight.” “News for everyone, but former President Bush might take note,” inveighed Jennings on March 31, 2000. “Self-scanning check-out systems are catching on at supermarkets. Customers scan and bag the groceries themselves and then to keep people honest, it checks to see if the weight of the groceries equals the weight of the items which were scanned.” Contrary to the president's assertion that ATMs contribute to nagging unemployment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) predicted that teller jobs would grow about 6 percent from 2008 to 2016. In addition, NRO's Jonah Goldberg pointed to statistics indicating expansive growth in banking jobs since the self-service banking era began in 1985: “At the dawn of the self-service banking age in 1985, for example, the United States had 60,000 automated teller machines and 485,000 bank tellers. In 2002, the United States had 352,000 ATMs – and 527,000 bank tellers.” Adding insult to injury, the ATM Industry Association took a swipe at Obama in an email to the Washington Examiner: “Given these major roles of the ATM, it would be quite irrational to turn the clock back to the 1960s to a time before ATMs.” –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …