Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 750)
Tom Coburn: The ‘Bond Vigilantes’ Are More Dangerous Than Not Raising Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media Why do Republicans insist on using this sort of language when trying to scare the crap out of everyone about a problem they created? “Bond vigilantes” Tom Coburn… really? This is nothing but an excuse to starve the beast and get rid of every social program that Republicans have hated for decades now. Rather than raise taxes on the rich, they’ll use this as an excuse to go after Social Security or other programs that help ordinary working people. Chuck Schumer laid out pretty plainly the dangers of not raising the debt ceiling this spring. He also talked about Eric Cantor admitting that it was going to have to be done. So if the Democrats give in to the Republicans on this, I agree with what Dibgy wrote the other day, it’s because they want to and not because they have to. GREGORY: All right, final question here about– what Eric Cantor in the House, a Republican leader, called a “leverage moment” for the Republicans on the debt ceiling. SCHUMER: Yeah. GREGORY: It has to be raised. We have to keep borrowing money, even though we’re so deep in debt. Republicans, Senator Schumer, to exact a promise on a certain amount of spending cuts before they vote to raise that ceiling. Do you think that agreement can be reached? SCHUMER: Well first, I think using the threat of not renewing the debt ceiling is like playing with fire. If we didn’t renew the debt ceiling, our soldiers and veterans wouldn’t be paid, Social Security checks wouldn’t go out, and worst of all, we might permanently threaten confidence– of the credit markets and the dollar, which could create a recession worse than the one we have now, or even a depression. So that is playing with fire. And I was glad to see that both Speaker Boehner and Eric Cantor said they’re not gonna use that as a threat. We have– are gonna have to come together on spending. There is no question about it. And we Democrats agree there oughta be spending cuts. And the appropriation that came up last year– late last year, the McCaskill-Sessions Proposal, bipartisan, to cut spending considerably lower– than was originally proposed in the budget– GREGORY: Right. SCHUMER: –was supported. But you can’t just do it willy nilly across the board. There are some things that changed since 2008 and need to be funded. GREGORY: Senator Coburn, does it have to be a specific amount– in cuts before you vote to raise the ceiling? COBURN: I think for me it does. I’ve had conversations with the President. Look– the debt ceiling, we had warnings last week from the rating agencies that we’re gonna get a downgrade in our bonds. A debt ceiling non-increase– is nothing compared to what’s gonna happen to us if we don’t address the real issues facing our country. The CBS poll out this morning, 77 percent of the people in this country believe we need to cut the spending significantly. Only nine percent– say we need to raise taxes. The fact is, is I believe the President and the– bipartisan majority in both houses know that we can come together before the debt ceiling and– reach an agreement that says, “Here’s where we’re gonna be and– here’s what we must do to send the signal to the international financial community.” If, in fact, we don’t raise the debt ceiling, that won’t be near the catastrophe that, if, in fact, the– the– the bond vigilantes come after the U.S. government bonds in the next two to three years– COBURN: –we will have such bigger pain than not raising the debt limit. GREGORY: I will let– make that the last word. Senators, thank you both very much.

Continue reading …
Bulls and Bears Panel Touts GM Incentive Pay for Hourly Workers While Trashing Unions

Click here to view this media Fox is at it again, bashing unions . Of course the panel on Bulls & Bears thinks this is a fantastic idea other than their one out-gunned “Democratic strategist” — GM may link vehicle quality, employee pay incentives . This might be a good time for a reminder of just what it took for American auto workers to get rid of things like piece work in the first place. The historic 1936-37 Flint auto plant strikes : The feisty young United Auto Workers launched the first of a series of sit-down strikes against General Motors at Fisher Body Plant No. 1 in Flint. The goals were to earn recognition for the UAW as the bargaining agent for GM workers, and to make the company stop shipping work to plants with nonunion workers. The strike lasted 44 days and became the first of many union victories. On Nov. 18, 1936, the UAW struck a Fisher Body plant in Altanta. On Dec. 16, they hit two GM plants in Kansas City, and on Dec. 28, a Fisher stamping plant in Cleveland. Two days later they struck Fisher Body No. 1 in Flint. Within two weeks, approximately 135,000 men from plants in 35 cities in 14 states were striking General Motors. As the nation was emerging from the Great Depression, the striking workers enjoyed the sympathy of most of the people, including Michigan governor Frank Murphy and popular New Deal President Franklin Delano Roosvelt. Roosevelt had promised in his inaugural speech to drive out the “economic royalists,” a pointed reference to the General Motors officials. The News gave this account: “The guardsmen forming a line around the No. 4 plant were part of a contingent of 1,200 who formed a bayoneted ring of steel around the 80-acre grounds which house all 12 plants of the Chevrolet Motor Car Co. at Flint. Machine guns emplacements were at strategic approaches and except for a small group of pickets outside the gates of the No. 4 plant, all visitors were barred unless they had special military passes. “The guardsmen surrounded the grounds and ‘enforced peace’ on orders of Gov. Murphy, following the rioting.” The News also gave the union version: “Then company police and hundreds of thugs, armed with tear gas pistols, tear gas bombs, blackjacks and clubs manufactured in the Chevrolet woodshop, attacked all workers in the plant, using floods of tear gas. It was a clear case, apparently, of company thugs against the workers since all the injured workers were found in the plants and no one was injured on the outside of the company property. City police do not seem to have been involved.” The National Guard fixed bayonets and halted any delivery of food to the occupiers. But the governor never ordered the troops into action. The strikers vowed a hunger strike until their families could bring them food, or their demands were met. The sit-downers appealed to the governor. President Roosevelt asked GM to meet with the union once more. The tension subsided. General Motors signed an agreement with the UAW, giving the union bargaining rights in 17 GM plants shut by sit-downs. Employees at the 17 plants involved got 5 percent pay hikes and were allowed to speak in the lunchroom. The company agreed not to discriminate against union members and agreed to begin negotiations on other matters. A synopsis of the issues included in the union demands: 1. Recognition of UAW as sole bargaining agency. 2. Abolition of piece work in favor of straight hourly rates. 3. A 30 hour week and 6 hour day, with time and a half for overtime. 4. A “minimum rate of pay commensurate with an American standard of living.” 5. Seniority rights based on length of service. 6. Reinstatement of all employes “unjustly discharged.” 7. Mutual agreement on “speed of production.” The dramatic military style battles depict the times and the desperation of those involved. The outcome much later in time proved that both the union and the company could coexist and indeed prosper beyond anyone’s expectations. Those who made the cars could finally afford to buy them, pouring profits back to the stockholders. Spreading the wealth caused more to be created. The pension and wages won by the workers raised the standard of living for the whole country.

Continue reading …

On NPR's On The Media on January 8, NPR's Bob Garfield assessed the tenure of White House spokesman Robert Gibbs with New York Times political reporter Mark Leibovich. Garfield's primary concern was Gibbs attacking the “professional left” for being unsatisfied. Garfield thought that was unnecessary, prodding Leibovich tout Team Obama's achievements: BOB GARFIELD: It seems to me that Gibbs may have observed that, but maybe deserves some of the blame? Was the dissatisfaction among that constituency partly the fault of Gibbs and the administration for not doing a better selling job? MARK LEIBOVICH: Look, there has been a widespread criticism of this White House, which is that it has a, quote, “communications problem,” that this is an administration that has legitimately accomplished a great deal, they've passed some historic legislation, and yet, has not, for whatever reason, been successful in promoting the good points of these accomplishments in a way that would make the American people truly understand what’s gone on. BOB GARFIELD: In fact, they've been on the defensive from the get-go, no? MARK LEIBOVICH: They have absolutely been on the defensive from the get-go. I think, to some degree, it’s unfair because, again, I don't think anyone has mastered the art of how to communicate in the environment that is today’s media. I think it’s telling that in the Press Secretary’s Office, in the closet, there is a flak jacket that has been passed down from every White House press secretary since Ron Nessen. BOB GARFIELD: Nessen, that’s Gerald Ford’s press secretary. MARK LEIBOVICH: Right, and only the acting press secretaries get to open the closet and see the flak jacket. And I think to some degree, you know, Robert Gibbs, in a very real sense, is on the front lines of the day-to-day battle of this media environment, in which there’s a lot of triviality and very, very short attention spans. And survival is probably the first job, and lack of embarrassment is probably the second job. And I think to some degree Robert Gibbs comes out of this with a career and future, and that’s probably, you know, at minimum, what you can hope for in a job that’s so fraught with peril. The odd concept in this discussion is that Team Obama was somehow embattled in the briefing room, as if they weren't surrounded by people that voted for them. The need for “flak jackets” differs widely depending on which party is holding the White House, and especially in the Era of Hope and Change.

Continue reading …

Gulf resident Cherri Foytlin pleads for medical help for Gulf residents as they continue to get sick both from the oil and from the Corexit used in the Gulf oil cleanup: NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana – In an emotionally charged meeting this week sponsored by the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, fishermen, Gulf residents and community leaders vented their increasingly grave concerns about the widespread health issues brought on by the three-month-long disaster. “Today I’m talking to you about my life,” Cherri Foytlin told the two commissioners present at the Jan. 12 meeting. “My ethylbenzene levels are 2.5 times the 95th percentile, and there’s a very good chance now that I won’t get to see my grandbabies…What I’m asking you to do now, if possible, is to amend . Because we have got to get some health care.” Ethylbenzene is a form of benzene present in the body when it begins to break down. It is also present in BP’s crude oil. “I have seen small children with lesions all over their bodies,” Foytlin, co-founder of Gulf Change, a community organisation based in Grand Isle, Louisiana, continued. “We are very, very ill. And dead is dead . So it really doesn’t matter if the media comes back… or the president hears us, or… if the oil workers and the fishermen and the crabbers get to feed their babies and maybe have a good Christmas next year… Dead is dead…I know your job is probably already done, but I’d like to hire you if you don’t mind. And God knows I can’t pay you. But I need your heart. And I need your voice.” Dr. Soto is finding disconcertingly consistent and high levels of toxic chemicals in every one of the patients he is testing. “I’m regularly finding between five and seven VOCs in my patients,” Dr. Soto told IPS. “These patients include people not directly involved in the oil clean-up, as well as residents that do not live right on the coast. These are clearly related to the oil disaster.” Nevertheless, U.S. government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, along with President Obama himself, have declared the Gulf of Mexico, its waters, beaches, and seafood, safe and open to the public.

Continue reading …
Fox News Watch: Jonathan Alter, Paul Krugman and Markos Moulitsas ‘Villains’ for Terrible Tucson Reporting

Fox News Watch panelists on Saturday named some villains concerning last week's tragedy in Tucson. Aside from the shooter himself, Newsweek's Jonathan Alter, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, and Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos were mentioned for their terrible coverage of this awful event (video follows with transcript and commentary): JON SCOTT, HOST: The media is always looking for heroes and sometimes villains in a case like this. Who made the list? LYNN SWEET, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES: Well, number one the only one on my list of villains is the shooter, and his motivations are still being looked into. SCOTT: And he deserves to be there. Bill? BILL MCGOWAN: I would also say the shooter, but I’d also say that Paul Krugman in introducing to the media bloodstream the idea that this was political before any facts were known was a disservice to the broader understanding of the story. Even though he's an opinion columnist, he should not have been putting that out there that quickly. SCOTT: Judy? JUDITH MILLER, FOX NEWS: And in that same category, Markos Moulitsas at the Daily Kos, who announced immediately without any facts at all, “Mission accomplished, Sarah Palin.” JIM PINKERTON, FOX NEWS: And I would add Jonathan Alter of Newsweek who wrote a very crude column advising President Obama on how to take maximum political advantage out of that speech that he gave in Tucson. All columnists like to give advice, but this is a little too much based on blood and tragedy. SCOTT: But there are lots of columnists who, you know, speculated on what the President should say, the nation needed healing, that kind of thing. PINKERTON: Yeah, I mean, just read the column and decide yourself if he went over the board of saying, “Look, this is a tragedy, but here’s how, do what Clinton did, but only do it better.” We at NewsBusters agree with this assessment, as we chronicled the misdeeds of all three media members: Newsweek's Jonathan Alter Gives Obama Advice on Exploiting Tucson Tragedy for Political Gain Paul Krugman Blames Giffords Shooting on Palin, Limbaugh and Beck Moulitsas's dishonor can be found in the above-referenced Krugman piece On the other hand, one could make the case that it's wrong to only mention these three as the coverage of this event was universally atrocious.

Continue reading …
OK, Glenn Beck: Are you man enough to take the CrooksandLiars Pledge?

Click here to view this media Sniff. Kinda makes you feel sad, doesn’t it? Nobody wants to sign Glenn Beck’s phony “non-violence” pledge. Hmmmmm. Wonder why that could be? Here’s Beck on Tuesday, whining: BECK: The number of people so far who signed this pledge denouncing violence: 14 — 14. Over 500 members in the House and Senate, and 14. Now, I was going to show you the 14 names because I’m proud of those guys, but maybe some other time. I don’t want this to turn into — I mean, this is not the Committee on Un-American Activities. That’s for Congress to do. Not a private citizen. So, I don’t want some list going around. I just want you to know it’s 14. And I have heard all kind of reasons and excuses. Some just say they just need more time. Some are afraid to be associated with it. Afraid? Some need more time to read it. It’s not really that complex. I don’t know if you know this. It’s this long. Others agree with it. Oh, Glenn, I’m telling you, we agree with it. We’re in complete agreement here. I’m a little uncomfortable signing anything. Really? Yeah, really. And as if to underscore exactly why, he went on O’Reilly last night and whined about it some more … and then launched into a vicious, demonizing smear of couple of leading progressive figures: Click here to view this media O’REILLY: So you would like to see the same kind of situation that happened after 9/11 attack now, where they would all come out and say, “Enough with this crap”? BECK: Of course. O’REILLY: Right. BECK: Every American wants that. What I… O’REILLY: Not every American. George Soros doesn’t want that. BECK: Frances Fox Piven doesn’t want that. O’REILLY: Who is Frances Fox Piven? BECK: Clariton (ph) Piven, from the 1960′s. That’s a theory that was inspired by the Watts riots and is being used right now. And she is actively, actively — Columbia University professor used to be. I think she’s — at SUNY (ph) now. But she is actively saying, “Rise up, embrace your anger. Turn on your bosses, turn on the politicians.” O’REILLY: All right. She’s Black Panther. Overthrow, kill the pigs. BECK: She is — she stands with the Clintons. Signing. She’s very… O’REILLY: Still around? BECK: Oh, yes. In fact, Frances Fox Piven was on with Amy Goodman the other night , and had to express her own bewilderment at the bizarre way that Beck is depicting and smearing her, as well as her work: As Media Matters points out, over at Beck’s own website, The Blaze, commenters responding to the Piven story left these comments — and they remained there even today [update: Some of these have now been taken down, though not all of them.]: enlarge enlarge enlarge You see, Glenn, here’s why no one is signing your Pledge: Because it contains this key point: I hold those responsible for the violence, responsible for the violence. I denounce those who attempt to blame political opponents for the acts of madmen. This is a copout, and everyone — except right-wing hatemongers and their Village apologists — knows it. Sure, everyone knows that crazy people do crazy things. But their heads get filled with crazy ideas by people who indulge in crazy talk for fun and profit. And the blood of the victims is on their hands too. The proof is right there at your own site, and there in your own rants. You claim to want to bring everyone together — and then viciously demonize people with whom you happen to disagree. Go look at those comments and try telling us again that your vicious demonization of people isn’t whipping up violent hatred, the kind that eventually gets acted upon. No one — no one — believes there is even an ounce of sincerity to your Pledge. We already know that you’re the last person on the planet who should be preaching nonviolence. Especially because you go out and prove our suspicions: let’s all come together except the progressives you intend to destroy. You see, Glenn, as SEK at Lawyers, Guns and Money explained the other day, violent rhetoric is not always the outright advocacy of violence, as you seem to think: it is just as often rhetoric that invites a specific audience to reach the conclusion that violence is the only appropriate action to deal with a problem. And this kind of rhetoric, as we know all too well, is your specialty in trade . So here’s what we at CrooksandLiars propose: We’ll sign your Pledge — with one simple amendment. Delete the copout “I hold those responsible” clause. And replace it with this clause: “I will not unnecessarily hold up entire groups of people, or representative leaders of those groups, and demonize and dehumanize them as objects fit only for elimination, especially in a way that invites my audience to take violent action to prevent dire catastrophes of my imagining.” Make that change, and we’ll happily sign your Pledge.

Continue reading …
Pat Buchanan Smacks Down Bill Press: ‘You’ve Got to Get Beyond Being a Fringe Talk Show Host’

During an impromptu reunion of CNN's “Crossfire” Friday, Pat Buchanan told his old sparring partner Bill Press, “You’ve got to get beyond being a fringe talk show host.” In the middle of a very heated debate on MSNBC's “The Ed Show,” Buchanan strongly cautioned the host and his liberal guest, “I think this last week, there’s been a climate of hatred built up against [Sarah Palin] who did nothing and I tell you, if she does run for president of the United States, I pray to the lord she’s given secret service protection from day one” (video follows with transcript and commentary): ED SCHULTZ, HOST: Welcome back to THE ED SHOW. The “Battleground” story tonight, I guess you could say, Sarah Palin is doubling down. She has no regrets, she’s not apologizing. And she’s not going to back down from what she said. Palin set off a firestorm of controversy this week releasing her now infamous video where she never apologized, played the victim, and outraged a lot of people by using the term, blood libel. Today, “The Daily Beast” reports that she signed on to be the keynote speaker on the program convention in Nevada after the shooting tragedy in Arizona. A lot of folks aren’t going to like that but the righties are gunning up, I guess you could say. She’s also scheduled to do her first live interview with Sean Hannity on the republican FOX News Channel Monday night. She’s not backing down. I think we’ve got that, and she still has her sights set on 2012 and I think she’s had a pretty tough week but let’s see what these guys think. Bill Press, nationally syndicated radio talk show host and Pat Buchanan, former presidential candidate and MSNBC political analyst. Gentlemen, great to have you with us tonight. BILL PRESS, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Hi, Ed. SCHULTZ: Pat, I almost had to get out the external defibrillator here in the office. My wife is a nurse because I heard you say earlier this week, you think Sarah Palin is a victim. Do you believe that, Pat? PAT BUCHANAN, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: I think that for the last week, she’s been a victim, Ed, in one the saddest smears that I’ve seen in a long, long time. From the very moment, they picked up those wounded and dead at that incident, she’s been charged with moral complicity in a crime which she had no responsibility whatsoever. It is been day and night. Day and night. Until finally, the president of the United States went out there and did a magnificent job I think in Arizona and said, put a stop to it, incivility is not responsible for this tragedy and let’s not uses it as what means to start up the wars, one against another again. Nicely stated by Buchanan. Now watch Press's pathetic response. PRESS: Hey, Ed, look, if Sarah Palin’s a victim, I’m an astronaut. Let me tell you something the victims are lying on the ground outside of the Safeway last Saturday in Tucson. Sarah Palin is a political figure, she’s a person who has used a lot of inflammatory rhetoric, nobody starting with you, Ed, me, not the president, nobody blamed her for what happened in Tucson, but they did say that she’s one of the ones who’s used a lot of gun-filled rhetoric including putting out that map with the crosshairs, she’s called it bull’s eyes and telling people to reload. You know it would had been so easy for Sarah Palin just to say, as I thought you said, Pat, all of a sudden, think about her language and maybe not use that gun- filled imagery anymore. Instead she whined and she called people, accused them of blood libel, it’s disgusting and I think her political career is over. BUCHANAN: Well, you’ve thought a lot of people’s political careers are over, Bill and they won 63 seats in the house last fall. President of the United States, Barack Obama said 19 — what was it 2008 when the Republicans bring a knife to a fight, we’re going to bring a gun. That’s over the top rhetoric. It had nothing to do with what happened out there in Arizona. And neither did Sarah Palin. You talk about her whining, she’s come out tough. She’s not only defended herself but she’s gone on the attack and that’s why you folks are out here talking about her tonight. PRESS: But that’s the problem, Pat. She went on the attack. Thank you for saying that. That’s exactly what she did. That’s not what they. BUCHANAN: Right. PRESS: Wait a minute, let me finish, please. That’s not what the American people wanted to hear. BUCHANAN: How do you know what the American people want? Great question, especially given recent polling data finding a small percentage of Americans believe the media was right for blaming this tragedy on heated political rhetoric. Not surprisingly, facts weren't interfering with Press's view of things: PRESS: Because, because, Pat, you look at the response to that memorial service where the president hit absolutely the right tone. Sarah Palin is tone deaf, at some point she’s got to go beyond being a fringe candidate, Pat. She had a chance. She missed it. She blew it. She’s done. BUCHANAN: Look, you’ve got to get beyond being a fringe talk show host, Bill. Here’s what happened. (LAUGHTER) PRESS: You’re a fringe TV talker. Come on, Pat, you can’t — why can’t — can you get away from the personal attacks? SCHULTZ: All right. Let’s go back to this, gentlemen, let’s go back to this. BUCHANAN: All right. Let me go back to the basic point. SCHULTZ: Pat, you bring up the point about what the president said. The president ought to apologize for that. He said it was the wrong use of words, he shouldn’t have done it. Sarah Palin’s apologized for nothing and I have to ask you, is it appropriate to put these crosshairs up and granted the Democrats have done it in the past but in the environment that we’re in right now, doesn’t this deserve you know, maybe I shouldn’t have done that? She can’t even bring herself to do that, Pat. BUCHANAN: Well, look, she’s got nothing to apologize for because she did nothing wrong. SCHULTZ: OK. BUCHANAN: Going forward, Ed, going forward, because of this, the Democrats showing the bull’s eyes on the stage, the crosshairs in the states, that goes out. But, Ed, look, why are you talking. SCHULTZ: How about blood libel? Is that going forward, Pat? Let’s play this sound bite, here it is right here. BUCHANAN: OK. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) SARAH PALIN,FORMER ALASKA GOVERNOR: Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence that they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible. (END VIDEO CLIP) SCHULTZ: Pat, was that appropriate? BUCHANAN: It is appropriate. I’ll tell you what, when Alan Grayson says, Republicans want you to die quickly — that is a smear. SCHULTZ: I’m not talking about Grayson. I’m talking about Sarah Palin, was that appropriate? BUCHANAN: She’s got the same right to use that phrase as Alan Dershowitz did. SCHULTZ: OK. BUCHANAN: As Andrew Sullivan did. As Michael Barone did. As Ann Coulter did. SCHULTZ: Ann Coulter, there’s a source for you. PRESS: Oh, boy, oh, boy, oh, boy. BUCHANAN: You know, let me tell you this. You know, Ed, look, you talk about a climate of hate. Now I think this last week, there’s been a climate of hatred built up against this woman who did nothing and I tell you, if she does run for president of the United States, I pray to the lord she’s given secret service protection from day one. Great point, especially given reports on Wednesday that Palin is now receiving an unprecedented number of death threats: (CROSSTALK) SCHULTZ: I tell you what, I hope that she has all of the protection in the world. Go ahead, Bill. I’ll give you — go ahead. PRESS: Just let me get in here, look, all people said is that among with a lot of other people, Sarah Palin used an imagery that was inappropriate. It would had been so easy for her to say, you know what, I didn’t intend any harm to anybody and I know she didn’t. I don’t accuse her of that. BUCHANAN: Why you’ve been talking about her for a week for? PRESS: But she could have said. BUCHANAN: She came out and did a tape. PRESS: Hey, Pat, hey, Pat, hey, Pat. I know this is cross fire but give me a shot. Listen, she could have said that was inappropriate. I wouldn’t use that language again, that’s all people wanted to hear and then move on, instead she missed that opportunity, Pat. The president saw the opportunity. And I really think that she made a fatal mistake in terms of her political career, just like going to this gun show, Pat. She’s already got that crowd. What’s that going to get her? Nothing but more inflammatory rhetoric. BUCHANAN: The last person — Sarah Palin is a national sensation. The second-most beloved woman in America after respected after Hillary Clinton. She’s got great success on the circuit. Eighteen of the 20 districts. PRESS: Fine. BUCHANAN: She targeted. She won those races. She doesn’t need your advice, Bill. SCHULTZ: OK, all right, Pat. (TALKING OVER EACH OTHER) PRESS: Let her stay on FOX News, Pat. SCHULTZ: Did she have a good week? Did she use proper judgment in using blood libel? That will not politically come back to haunt her in your opinion, yes or no? BUCHANAN: Ed, you decide in your own way whether things come back to haunt her. You guys have been working this line and working this thing continually. SCHULTZ: I didn’t release the tape, Pat, she did. I didn’t release the tape, she did. BUCHANAN: She released that tape five days after this smear campaign began and I think she had every right to do so. SCHULTZ: The right to use blood libel. BUCHANAN: She has the first amendment right just like do you, Ed. SCHULTZ: Go ahead, Bill. PRESS: Shame on you, Pat. You know what that word means, that word has no place in American politics whether she knew what it meant or not, it’s stunningly. SCHULTZ: Buchanan and Press, great to have you guys with us tonight. Gentlemen, time-out. Thanks so much. BUCHANAN: Alan Dershowitz say, it was fine to use it. PRESS: Who cares about Alan Dershowitz? We’re talking about Sarah Palin. We’re talking about Sarah Palin, Pat. SCHULTZ: All right. We have to go. Thanks. Pat Buchanan and Bill Press, you guys are great. Yeah, you are talking about Sarah Palin, Bill. Seems like that's all you liberal media members want to talk about. Makes you wonder why more people don't want the former Alaska governor to become president just to show up all the so-called journalists that have been tearing her limb from limb since August 2008. Exit question: will liberal media members like Press and Schultz ever admit they were wrong for immediately tying Palin to this awful event, or will they continue pointing their fingers despite the evidence? (H/T Right Scoop )

Continue reading …
Anderson Cooper Trashes Think Progress by Comparing Their Site to Michelle Malkin’s

Click here to view this media Anderson Cooper and his producers apparently think that something mentioned in a post by the liberal web site Think Progress that was not the main topic of the post that they took issue with somehow is equal to what hatemonger Michelle Malkin does day in and day out on her blog, and these two websites somehow are equal in spreading misinformation to the public. All I can say after watching this is: Shame on Anderson Cooper and his producers, and shame on the supposed liberal on the panel, Maria Cardona, for letting this pass without defending the work that Think Progress has done week after week on their site. Here is the post that was being criticized by Cooper — Gohmert Warns Of ‘Reverting’ To Era Of Congressional Duels — While Pushing Bill To Arm Congressmen . The main substance of that post was that it is pretty well insane for Gohmert to be pushing for handguns to be allowed on the House floor. They mentioned that his argument that there was a handgun ban in DC was not true. Here’s Cooper’s criticism of that. COOPER: Well, the liberal blog ThinkProgress jumped all over Gohmert’s idea, mocking it, calling it — quote — “harebrained.” Their main point was this, though. “Gohmert” — and I’m quoting — “Gohmert explained the need for his bill by falsely claiming that Washington, D.C., has a gun ban. The Roberts Supreme Court did away with D.C.’s handgun ban in 2008.” Well, there’s only one problem with that statement. It’s wrong. Even after that Supreme Court decision, ordinary citizens cannot carry a registered — registered handgun in D.C. You can keep a handgun in your home if you have a permit, but you can’t carry one. Now, you can say what you want about Louie Gohmert’s idea of lawmakers carrying guns in and around the Capitol, but you should criticize it based on actual facts, not made-up ones, which is just what ThinkProgress did. So what part of not being able to carry a gun outside of your home did Cooper not realize was still banned? You know, the one that would mean you also can’t carry one into the halls of Congress. Jebus these people make my head hurt. This just looks like an excuse to me for CNN to play the “all sides are equally bad” game and take a shot at Think Progress. Those folks actually have one of the few liberal think tanks out there behind the research they’re doing, unlike Malkin, who just makes crap up to be outraged about. And one last note here: If Think Progress does end up thinking they made a mistake in their reporting, we’re likely to get a retraction from them. You’re never going to see that from the likes of Michelle Malkin. In the meantime, we get to hear more of the “all sides do it” bulls**t from the Villagers who would not recognize an honest conservation about anything if it bit them on the nose. Transcript below the fold via CNN . COOPER: We begin “Keeping Them Honest” with politicians and pundits playing politics with the tragedy in Tucson. There are cringe-worthy examples on both the left and right. We showed you fund-raising letters that went out earlier in the week. At the memorial service in Tucson on Wednesday, President Obama implored politicians and the whole nation really to tone it down, to honor those who lost their lives by stepping up the civility. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: And if, as has been discussed in recent days, their death helps usher in more civility in our public discourse, let us remember it is not because a simple lack of civility caused this tragedy — it did not — but rather because only a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to the challenges of our nation in a way that would make them proud. (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE) (END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Well, from pundits and politicians from both sides of the aisle, there has been and continues to be a lot of finger- pointing. Some on each side are claiming they hold the exclusive deed on the high road, accusing the other side of playing politics. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, “THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW”) RUSH LIMBAUGH, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He’s sitting there in jail. He knows what’s going on. He knows that a Democrat Party, the Democrat Party, is attempting to find anybody but him to blame. He knows, if he plays his cards right, he’s just a victim. (END AUDIO CLIP) (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, “THE HUCKABEE REPORT”) MIKE HUCKABEE (R), FORMER ARKANSAS GOVERNOR: Meanwhile, a lot of people in politics and the media covered themselves in shame by rushing to judgment about the alleged shooter, Jared Lee Loughner. The same people who were so quick to falsely blame the Tea Party for the bomb planted in Times Square apparently learned nothing from that mistake. (END AUDIO CLIP) (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, FOX NEWS CHANNEL) BERNARD GOLDBERG, AUTHOR, “100 PEOPLE WHO ARE SCREWING UP AMERICA”: Well, in all my years as a working journalist, I have never seen such shallow, thoughtless, agenda-driven dribble as I have in the past 36 hours. And it’s all masquerading as serious analysis and commentary. (END VIDEO CLIP) (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) SEN. JOHN KERRY (D), MASSACHUSETTS: Now, many observers have already reduced this tragedy to simple questions of whether overheated rhetoric is to blame or one partisan group or another. (END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Well, a lot of it is just finger-pointing about finger- pointing. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but, recently, we have noticed a few people or groups who think they’re entitled to their own facts. Two examples tonight, first, a liberal blog called ThinkProgress attacking a Republican congressman based on something that’s simply not true. The congressman is Louie Gohmert from Texas. And he wants members of Congress to be allowed to carry guns inside the Capitol Building, even on the House floor. He explained his reasoning in an interview with WorldNetDaily’s Radio America. (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP, RADIO AMERICA) REP. LOUIE GOHMERT (R), TEXAS: And up here in Washington, D.C., because there’s a gun ban, beside law enforcement, the only people that have guns here are the criminals. So, we’re looking at a bill that would allow members of Congress to carry a weapon. (END AUDIO CLIP) COOPER: Well, the liberal blog ThinkProgress jumped all over Gohmert’s idea, mocking it, calling it — quote — “harebrained.” Their main point was this, though. “Gohmert” — and I’m quoting — “Gohmert explained the need for his bill by falsely claiming that Washington, D.C., has a gun ban. The Roberts Supreme Court did away with D.C.’s handgun ban in 2008.” Well, there’s only one problem with that statement. It’s wrong. Even after that Supreme Court decision, ordinary citizens cannot carry a registered — registered handgun in D.C. You can keep a handgun in your home if you have a permit, but you can’t carry one. Now, you can say what you want about Louie Gohmert’s idea of lawmakers carrying guns in and around the Capitol, but you should criticize it based on actual facts, not made-up ones, which is just what ThinkProgress did. On the right, conservative blogger Michelle Malkin has been pushing a story that seems to have no basis in fact. She says the color scheme at the Tucson memorial was some sort of a political conspiracy. She has a diatribe on her blog about what she called the branding of the Tucson massacre. She wrote that the White House was behind the “Together we thrive” theme at Wednesday’s memorial, and she didn’t like the sea of blue on the signs and the T-shirts. Malkin wrote — quote — “Will there — will there be giant foam fingers and blue cotton candy, too? Can’t the Democrat political stage give it a break just once?” But here’s the problem with that. According to the University of Arizona, the White House had nothing to do with the logo or the T- shirts. The university says it was behind — it was behind the branding. The shirts, they say, were designed by a student, and the university paid for them. On her blog, Malkin backtracked, but only kind of, writing, “Given U-of-A president Robert Shelton’s embarrassing, thinly-veiled partisan cheerleading for Obama tonight, it may indeed be a 100 percent campus-initiated campaign. Given the Obama campaign — given the Obama White House’s meticulous attention to stage prop details, however, I would say the odds of involvement by Axelrod, Plouffe and others are high,” regarding two Obama advisers, David Axelrod and David Plouffe. Now, no facts to back it up, and facts matter, the truth matters, maybe even more than ever right now. Joining me now, senior political analyst David Gergen, political analyst and Republican strategist Ed Rollins, and Democratic strategist Maria Cardona. Ed, if the finger-pointing and the deliberate misinformation isn’t going to stop now, in the wake of a tragedy like this, I mean, is there ever hope of it stopping at all? ED ROLLINS, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTOR: I wish it would. I wish the tone would go down. I mean, the bottom line is, the Republicans now have the votes and they can be in the meetings and may — can make their cases, and obviously pass out things out of the House. They don’t need to be yelling and screaming back and forth. And equally as important, the Democrats don’t have to be yelling back and forth. I think a lot of it is the blogs, a lot of it is talk radio, a lot of it is cable shows. I think the key thing here is, can members of Congress sit down and come to some compromise on some very significant issues? I’m — I’m doubtful of that. The — there’s such distance between the various programs, you know, the key thing here is, can you fiscally balance budgets or push towards balancing budgets, eliminate programs, you know, add some revenue, without killing each other? COOPER: It is interesting, Maria. I mean, it seems so juvenile, basically, both sides saying, no, you started it; you started it. MARIA CARDONA, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Oh, absolutely, Anderson. I think the whole thing is just nonsense on both sides. And I don’t think either side does itself any favors when it goes either on the blogs or on TV or on Web sites, and tries to accuse the other side, without having any facts to back it up. It demeans all of us, and it demeans the political discourse. And it doesn’t get us to where we need to be, to President Obama’s point. We have huge problems that we need to try to solve. So, I do think it’s incumbent — incumbent upon our leaders to give the example to all of us that we can live up to, but it’s also incumbent upon all of us, on you, Anderson, on you, Ed, on myself, everybody who is part of this political discourse, to try to take it down a notch and make sure that what you’re saying is either fact-based, and just focus on ideas, and don’t do it personally. COOPER: David, you think things have actually gotten better this week? DAVID GERGEN, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, Anderson, I’m more hopeful. And let me acknowledge up front I thought the president’s speech Wednesday night was successful, but it clearly was even more successful than I imagined. I think he resonated with much of the country, to his credit. And I think he poured water on a lot of the flames that were out there, that there are still some fires burning. We have some outliers, are the ones — the ones you have cited tonight, and it’s good to keep them accountable, to keep the focus on them. But I — I think, next week, for example, as the Republicans in the House of Representatives debate the health care bill, my expectation is, their arguments will be more tempered than they would have been otherwise. I think there will be less demonization. Sure, they are going to disagree with the health care bill. That’s what they ran on. But I think they will do it in a more tempered way. And I do think the president has opened the way now to a new conversation that he can continue in his State of the Union, in — in ways that can bring people together, perhaps institutionalize more bipartisanship, more bipartisan meetings, meetings at Camp David and the like, and actually do more shaming, as — as your show is doing tonight, shame those people who are the outliers, so that they get off this, and we — and we put more of the flames out. COOPER: Ed, do you think that’s true, A., that the president will try to do that in the State of the Union, and that next week’s debate on health care will kind of reflect some sort of a change? ROLLINS: I think the president gave a superb speech. And I think he lifted it to a higher, higher plane. You know, I mean, he was very partisan in the course of the campaign, more so than most presidents. But, you know, go back to a president David and I both worked for, Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan — there’s this great myth that Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill sat down and had a beer every night on the South Lawn and resolved things. It was a very partisan period of time, too, but there was a gentle tone. And the American public saw a couple of congenial Irish guys that weren’t yelling and screaming at each other, even though, behind the scenes, it was tough. Equally as important, there was more of a social life in Washington. A Bob Michel could go play golf with a Tip O’Neill. They were friends. They weren’t — they weren’t enemies. They could fight on issues. Danny Rostenkowski, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, would sit down and work out with David Stockman on the budgets. Today there’s no social life, and so, to a certain extent, in the last 10, 15 years, it’s gotten more and more partisan on both sides. They don’t know each other. COOPER: Hmm. ROLLINS: So, all that they’re doing is dealing with rhetoric. And you need to eliminate — where I’m hopeful is that the members of Congress and the Senate, which is really where it matters, speak with a softer tone and fight for — hard for their issues, but speak with a softer tone. COOPER: It’s hard, though, Maria, after the last campaign that we have seen, the last election, you know, a lot of folks getting elected with very tough tone. CARDONA: I think that’s exactly right. And I think the other thing that is a reality today, Anderson, that wasn’t even 10 — or maybe even five years ago is that we have a 24/7 news cycle that is full of bloggers, is full of tweeters, is full of Facebookers, that can actually ignite and — and put more gasoline on the fire than otherwise would have been the case in a normal daily political debate of 10 years ago. COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: So I think that has really changed this. And I think what we all need to realize, including these bloggers, including anybody who put a post — a post up on Facebook, is that you’re not just talking to your friend, you’re not just talking to your neighbor. You are now talking to America. And your words can matter, and your words can influence. COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: That’s what we all have to realize, which I don’t think we have realized to this point. COOPER: David? GERGEN: Anderson, I do want to express one sense of disappointment. And that is, the deeper problem with this shooting has been the culture of violence in this country. We have too much hate, too many guns, too many killings. You know, the United States has 20 times as many killings by guns as other developed countries. And, among teenagers, people, we — we have over 40 times as many killings by guns. And there has been a reluctance on both sides to face up to the gun culture and the violence and what this is all about. And that is a disappointment. It’s going to take a long time to get there, clearly. COOPER: Obviously, it’s a — it’s a hot issue. A lot of people disagree with you, David, who simply don’t think… GERGEN: Sure do. COOPER: … that guns are the problem, as we have… CARDONA: Anderson, can I just… COOPER: Yes. CARDONA: Can I just finish this one thing? First of all, I completely agree with David 100 percent. But, secondly, you know, I’m raising two kindergarten-age children. And it just seems to me, especially in these last couple of days, it is so simple to just go back and — and look at what we all learned in kindergarten, the golden rule. Let’s treat each other how we would like for them to treat us. I know it sounds simple, but, clearly, you know, a lot of the — the solutions to the hardest problems are the simple ones. We should all go back and take a look at that and live it in our everyday lives. COOPER: Maria Cardona, appreciate you being on. Ed Rollins, David Gergen, thank you.

Continue reading …
New Rules: Bill Maher to the Teabaggers – The Founding Fathers Would Have Hated Your Guts

Click here to view this media Bill Maher was back on the air this weekend with the 2011 premier of Real Time and he had a few things to say about what the Founding Fathers might have thought of this anti-intellectual teabagger movement in his New Rules segment.

Continue reading …
Bozell Column: No Tucson Lectures for ‘Artists’

Within minutes of the news breaking that Jared Lee Loughner had killed six and wounded 12 in a rampage outside a Tucson safeway store, including a critically injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, the news media immediately leapt to the conclusion that the harsh tone of our political discourse – led by conservative talk radio — surely must be to blame. That narrative turned out to be hogwash, but another one has emerged during the investigation into Loughner’s psyche, yet virtually no one wants to discuss it. Was the shooter inspired by the entertainment media? Why would violent movies or music be left out of the rush to judgment? Perhaps it’s because pop-culture defenders never tire of arguing that no one can blame the “artists” – be they musicians, movie-makers or video-game manufacturers – for youth violence. So it becomes awkward, to say the least, that everyone’s discussing the need to curb a national appetite for angry rhetoric, when it was disturbing music and movies that were influencing Loughner’s mind, and they are ignored. It took 72 hours for Loughner’s entertainment appetites to enter the media mainstream. On January 11, The Washington Post noted that on the shooter’s YouTube channel, a lone video is listed as a favorite. J. Freedom du Lac reported on the rock band Drowning Pool: “As a hooded figure wearing a garbage bag for pants limps across the desert to set fire to an American flag, a howling heavy-metal song called ‘Bodies’ serves as the video's relentless soundtrack.” The lyrics are screamed: “Let the bodies hit the floor! Let the bodies hit the floor! Let the bodies hit the floor!” in an obvious echo of a shooting rampage like Loughner’s. This isn’t the first time this music was associated with a murder.

Continue reading …