Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 749)
FCC Approves Comcast/NBC Universal Merger

enlarge This is really a disaster. The FCC approved the merger of Comcast and NBC on Tuesday. The vote was 4 to 1, with Democratic commissioner Michael Copps casting the dissenting vote. The New York Times reports that the Justice Department, which also has to approve the deal, is expected to do so later on Tuesday. The Wrap quoting the sole dissenter, Michael Copps : The merger passed with votes from two the Democrats and two Republicans on the commission. The sole dissenter was Democratic Commissioner Michael J. Copps, who said in a statement that the transaction was “like no other that has come before this Commission—ever.” “It reaches into virtually every corner of our media and digital landscapes and will affect every citizen in the land,” he said. “It is new media as well as old; it is news and information as well as sports and entertainment; it is distribution as well as content. And it confers too much power in one company’s hands.” Specific conditions of the merger are here . They’re just a drop in the bucket, a nominal fee to pay for 7 years to own all of it, start to finish.

Continue reading …
Dana Milbank: It’s Important That People are Held to Account for Nasty Rhetoric

Click here to view this media Looks like Howard Kurtz isn’t done carrying water for Sarah Palin yet this week. He went after Dana Milbank for his op-ed in the Washington Post where he wrote this: While the accusations sometimes go too far – there’s no evidence that either Palin or Beck inspired the Tucson suspect – the heat is well deserved. Both are finally being held to account for recklessly playing with violent images in a way that is bound to incite the unstable. In Beck’s case, as I reported last year , it already has – repeatedly. Milbank defended his column and pointed out that yes it is fair to hold these people accountable for their nasty rhetoric and that in Beck’s case there’s a direct line to the people he’s incited. KURTZ: Let me go back to Dana Milbank, because I want to bring up a column you that wrote this week in “The Washington Post.” You wrote about, among others, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin. You mentioned that that drives traffic and ratings. And undoubtedly it does. They’re both of course on Fox. And you said two things. You said, one, “There’s no evidence that they inspired the Tucson gunman.” And then you said, and I’m quoting here, “Both are being finally held to account for recklessly playing with violent images in a way that is bound to incite the unstable.” “Bound to incite the unstable.” You’re connecting the dots between their rhetoric and violence. MILBANK: Well, between violence, but not in this case, the Loughner case. What I — in a sense, it’s rough justice. I think it is very important that people are held to account for this nasty rhetoric that is causing — in Glenn Beck’s case, I’ve documented a few cases in which it’s led a crazy person to snap in the opinion of — KURTZ: Well, wait a minute. Hold on, Dana. You just used the verb “led.” There was a case — we talked about this last time you were on — where somebody wounded two California police officers who was very angry — MILBANK: And said he was driven to do so by what he heard from Glenn Beck. (CROSSTALK) KURTZ: OK. So it’s fair to hold a talk show host responsible for what some violent or perhaps unbalanced person does because they like what this person says on the airwaves? MILBANK: Yes, Howie, in the aggregate. I don’t think — you can’t say in every individual case. You know, who knows what any one crazy person is going to do? But the problem is there’s developing a pattern here. That’s why I’m saying yes, I think it’s irresponsible, and I think it’s a bit of a straw man, that people are claiming that, you know, Beck and Palin are being blamed. Mostly, people are saying they’re not being blamed for this particular incident. They are being blamed, as well as some on the left should be blamed, for inciting people generally. It probably — we don’t know for sure. It probably wasn’t a driver in this case, but it’s a driver in so many other cases. And I agree with David that you need to look out for the effect your words are having on the sane people. But I think you also need to worry about that fraction of one percent who just might be driven over the edge.

Continue reading …
Ike Lays It Out – The Military-Industrial Complex – January 17, 1961

enlarge “There – I said it, and I’m glad I said it” . Click here to view this media A significant day for a lot of reasons. First, it’s Martin Luther King Day but it’s also the 50th anniversary of the famous Eisenhower Farewell Address, or the “Military-Industrial Complex” address as it’s come to be known. Pres. Eisenhower: “A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be might, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. . . . American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. . . . This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” Where one is a celebration of a life of peace, the other is an acknowledgment of a world in turmoil. Still is.

Continue reading …
Chris Wallace begs Chris Christie to run for President in 2012

Click here to view this media Gov. Chris Christie is the GOP’s new Great Hope to overtake the White House and on FOX News, Chris Wallace was practically begging him to run for President in 2012. From Lexis Nexis: WALLACE: You have repeatedly rejected calls to run for president in 2012. In fact, you said, short of suicide, you don’t know what you could do to convince people that you’re not running. But I want to put up — because I’m still not convinced, I want to put up a poll, a new poll of all the potential GOP candidates. And the only one who currently beats President Obama is a fellow named Chris Christie, 43 percent to 40 percent. Don’t you think you’re up to being president? CHRISTIE: Listen, the president, rather, can rest easy, because the only guy who is beating him in that poll isn’t running. I have a state to run. I love New Jersey. WALLACE: But why not? You obviously feel strongly about this. You think you have got a better way to do it and that everybody else is messing it up. Why not go for it? CHRISTIE: Listen, two reasons. One, I have a commitment to my state. I have been governor for a year. New Jersey’s problems are not fixed. We have a lot of hard work to do. (CROSSTALK) WALLACE: You don’t think you could help more in the White House than in the state house? CHRISTIE: No, I don’t think I can help New Jersey more in the White House than I can help it in the state house. And secondly, you have got to believe in your heart that you’re personally ready to be president, and I’m not there. WALLACE: Why not? I mean, seriously. You say you answer the questions. In what way are you not ready to be president? CHRISTIE: Listen, I think every year you have as a governor in an executive position in a big state like New Jersey would make you better prepared to be president. And after one year as governor, I am not arrogant enough to believe that after one year as governor of New Jersey and seven years as the United States attorney that I’m ready to be president of the United States, so I’m not going to run. WALLACE: Yes, but you know, and I heard you say it might make more sense somewhere down the line, 2016, 2020, whatever. But one of the things that Obama learned and showed us all in 2007, when it’s your moment, you have got to move. CHRISTIE: Listen, that is a decision that he made. And he’s obviously was successful in winning the presidency. My view is I want to, if I ever would have run for the presidency, if I was ever to do it, I want to make sure in my heart I feel ready. And I don’t think you run just because political opportunity is there. That’s how we wind up with politicians who aren’t ready for their jobs. WALLACE: Governor Christie, we want to thank you so much for coming in. And please come back, sir. It’s a pleasure to talk to you. CHRISTIE: I will. Thanks, Chris. Their love affair with Christie is rooted basically in only two facts I can see at this time. A) He’s a good communicator on TV. He’s fairly articulate and appears like a guy you’d want to have a beer and a hot dog with. B) He loves bullying state and union workers around during town halls while canceling a major tunnel project that would have meant many jobs for NJ . The Teachers Union is in line this time for his authoritarian act. He loved to tell this teacher that if she didn’t like his merit pay idea it she could stop teaching. And the Tea Party loves him because of this. Already the merit pay scheme has been discredited. Education experts say Gov. Christie’s teacher merit pay can do more harm than good for students And here’s a study that proves the point of the useless merit pay scam he’s trying to pull on teachers. Paying teachers bonuses to improve student test scores may not work after all, according to a new study researchers say is the first scientifically rigorous test of merit pay. Vanderbilt University researchers studied a program in Nashville that offered bonuses of $5,000 to $15,000 to middle school math teachers if their students scored higher than expected on a statewide exam, according to a report released today. After three years, the program proved to be a bust, the study said. Except for some temporary gains, students did not progress any faster in classrooms where teachers were offered bonuses. Christie and NJ are in crisis and he hasn’t fixed a thing there yet except making job cuts and refusing tunnel projects. He’s also didn’t distinguish himself with his latest showing of arrogance when he stayed on a Florida vacation instead of helping NJ when the snow came. Rudy Giuliani blasted him for it. On Morning Joe today, Rudy Giuliani looked back at Chris Christie’s much-discussed absence from New Jersey during the snow storm. “Chris should’ve come back. I mean, if he asked me my advice, I would’ve said ‘They elected you governor, they’ve got an emergency, they expect you to be there.’ You know, you’ve got to be there if you’re a governor, a mayor, or even a president, if it’s important enough.” The Zogby poll which shows Christie beating Obama 43-40 has FOX and their friends in a dizzy. Funny how they didn’t mention the PPP poll which shows that Obama whipping Christie in NJ, 55-38. Expect to see more FOX News love heaped upon Christie. If they could get away with it, he’d probably be on their payroll already.

Continue reading …
The Battle Hymn of Sarah Palin

Click here to view this media Divine inspiration from somewhere in the heartland. I’ll just let it speak for itself. And Sarah. Here are the lyrics: She’s a cold blast from Alaska Ingrained with common sense She’s not a Harvard lawyer But she knew what the Founders meant A cold blast from the north That freezes Congress in their tracks With God and the Tea Party She’s gonna take it back [Chorus] Sarah Palin, she won’t listen to their bunk Sarah Palin’s comin’ south to hunt some skunk Sarah Palin, she’ll throw them all in jail And when she gets to Washington It’ll be cold as hell Sarah has the wisdom To walk through an open door She is stomping out the wretches Where the evil lines are stored She will scrub the floors and sweep the riff raff into cracks With God and the Tea Party She’s gonna take it back [Chorus] [Spoken] Congress patted themselves on the back For some new bill they just passed I watch as my freedom slowly runs through an hourglass They think they spend our money better than we do But they can talk until they’re blue and old ‘Cause if they ever gave us anything They always wanted something in return Sarah knows. Sarah’s marching home YouTube version is here.

Continue reading …
Uncloaking The Kochs: A Common Cause Event in Rancho Mirage

enlarge Charles and David Koch, using their money to make sure the only voices that count in a democracy are theirs. Don’t they look like the brothers from ‘Trading Places’? The Common Cause event will be held in Rancho Mirage , close to where the Koch brothers are holding their 2012 strategy session. Sounds like fun! Progressive and liberal activists are planning at the end of the month to confront the secretive billionaire family that finances the so-called Tea party movement and a host of other right-wing causes and institutions. “Our government is supposed to be of, by and for the people. So are you ready to take it back?” an invitation for the “Uncloaking the Kochs” event asked. The Sunday, Jan. 30 event thrown by Common Cause, a nonpartisan, grassroots organization, aims to educate attendees in California on the Koch brothers who will be strategizing nearby with their mega-wealthy allies to win the 2012 elections. Afterwards, activists will rally in Rancho Mirage. “We can’t sit back while a few billionaires destroy the fragile fabric of democracy and the protections that are so necessary for the health of our society,” Jodie Evans of CodePink told Alternet. “It is time for the progressive community to gather together and say no more, and what better place than where the Koch brothers are plotting their next moves.” Panel discussions will feature Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary; Van Jones, founder of Green for All; Erwin Chemerinsky, UC Irvine Law Dean; Lee Fang, Center for American Progress blogger and Koch Brothers expert; and DeAnn McEwen, co-president of the California Nurses Association. For the last 30 years, the Koch brothers, who inherited their wealth from their father’s oil interests, have funded a large portion of the conservative movement on issues that promote business over the environmental, labor, and public health concerns. Recently, David and Charles Koch through their network of foundations and nonprofits outspent ExxonMobile on astroturf campaigns to misinform the American public about climate change legislation .

Continue reading …
Monica Crowley Claims There Are Equal Levels of Vile, Vicious and Violent Rhetoric Coming From the Left as the Right

Click here to view this media When Monica Crowley puts up the same kind of list with supposed liberal violence or rhetoric that Digby linked in her post here with what we’ve seen from the right since they’ve lost their damned minds after President Obama got elected, then maybe I’ll take her flame-throwing false equivalencies seriously. Crowley decided to play the “all sides are equal” game on PBS’s The McLaughlin Group and did one major job of projection here. CROWLEY: I think it was a good, well modulated speech and I think the tone was perfectly appropriate. And I do think this was a presidential moment for him because, really for the first time in two years, he spoke on behalf of all of the American people, not just on behalf of his party, not just on behalf of the left, but really spoke on behalf of all of us. So I think it was an important moment. I do think he missed two opportunities. The first one is, I think he waited too long to deliver the message. Another memorial service was scheduled for Wednesday, but he could have come out on Sunday or Monday with a message to his own side telling them to cut it out when they were drawing this very sort of malicious and vicious lies that somehow conservative talk or our political climate have caused this particular act of violence which even he admitted later did not. He let his side run wild for days with this malicious lie. The second thing is, I think even though he did give an effective beat down to his own side by saying this does not… there is no direct correlation between this act of violence by a lone psychopath and our political climate. I think he stopped full of a full rebuke of the complete irresponsibility of folks on his own side that still continue to try to link this act or other things with political talk on the conservative side. Eleanor mentioned Roger Ailes at Fox and Sarah Palin’s web site, but I would like to see the left take the lead in moderating their talk, because for every one example you can give from the right, there were plenty of examples on the left of the most vile, vicious and even violent kind of rhetoric coming out of the left.

Continue reading …
ABC’s Muir Tags Michael Reagan as ‘Conservative’ But Skips Ron Jr’s Ideology

Picking up on “a family feud” fueled by a decision by ABC News to promote Ron Reagan Jr’s new book in which he insists his father displayed symptoms of Alzheimer’s while in his first presidential term, ABC anchor David Muir, who failed to identify Ron Jr. as a liberal, reported “Ron's conservative half-brother Michael Reagan is blasting him.” Muir highlighted Michael’s devastating tweet: “My brother was an embarrassment to his father when he was alive and today he became an embarrassment to his mother.” After citing another tweet in which Michael charged “my brother seems to want to sell out his father to sell books,” Muir tried to attribute Michael’s disgust to a rivalry: “Michael Reagan, now angry with his brother, also has a book out this week .” Ron Reagan Jr. once hosted a show on MSNBC and is a regular guest on the left-wing channel where he reliably offers liberal commentary. In the January 16 Parade magazine he displayed his inability to refrain from taking liberal pokes at his late father’s policies. The excerpt, from My Father at 100 , included: His cherished tax cuts were passed. However, they were scaled back when it became apparent that trickle-down economics was, indeed, “voodoo.” (Something better to read. Parade has posted their December 4, 1983 cover story by then-President Ronald Reagan: “ How to Stay Fit: The President’s personal exercise program .”) From the Sunday, January 16 ABC World News: DAVID MUIR: Tonight, a family feud is brewing, Ronald Reagan's sons arguing over their father's mind during his presidency. In a new book, Ron Reagan Jr. says his father showed signs of Alzheimer's while he was President, even during his first term. He spoke to ABC's Elizabeth Vargas. RON REAGAN JR ON FRIDAY’S 20/20: There was just something that was off. I couldn't quite put my finger on it. MUIR: Now, Ron's conservative half-brother Michael Reagan is blasting him. On Twitter he writes: “My brother was an embarrassment to his father when he was alive and today he became an embarrassment to his mother.” And he goes on to write: “My brother seems to want to sell out his father to sell books. My father did not suffer from Alzheimer’s in the '80s.” Incidentally, Michael Reagan, now angry with his bother, also has a book out this week. The brothers now feuding. — Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …
AZ Shooting Victim Arrested At ABC Town Hall For Threatening AZ Tea Party’s Trent Humphries

Click here to view this media (h/t Heather at VideoCafe) Susie mentioned it in her earlier post , but I think this is deserving of its own discussion. ABC News held a town hall in Arizona to address issues surrounding last weekend’s tragic shooting, with members of the community, law enforcement, tea party activists and even victims and their families of the shooting. When moderator Christiane Amanpour asked a question of AZ Tea Party head Trent Humphries–the same man who said that Giffords is the one to blame for the shooting because she had the gall to meet with constituents without armed security to protect her–shooting victim James Eric Fuller allegedly pointed a camera at Humphries and said, “You’re dead.” The incident occurred as Humphries criticized the applause at Wednesday’s memorial, and just before he suggested “introspection” before engaging in a “national debate” begins. Humphries also began by suggesting that health care privacy laws like HIPAA might be as culpable as gun laws in the tragedy. [..] Humphries doesn’t appear to have heard the initial remark, but there’s a moment, later in the clip, where he turns his head at another less audible utterance from someone in the crowd. ABC showed Fuller being arrested and escorted out of the building by police. He was later involuntarily committed for a psychiatric evaluation. I think it’s important to first and foremost say that threatening violence is unacceptable. I don’t know Fuller’s political ideology nor do I think it matters. Wrong is wrong is wrong, on either side of the aisle. At risk of being accused of being Dr. Frist, I have to wonder if Fuller is suffering some sort of PTSD from the shooting, but his issues may run deeper and longer than last week. Some on the C&L team have speculated that Fuller was trying to make a larger point over the dangers of the casual use of violent rhetoric and how it charges the climate with fear and instability. In a CBS profile , he blamed Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Sharron Angle for their eliminationist rhetoric. The pointing of a camera demonstrated just how easy it is to point a gun and get off a shot before anyone else can unholster their gun in response. It’s an interesting point, although it’s far too early to make definitive statements on Fuller’s motivation. But the point remains: we must, must, MUST ratchet down the rhetoric. Democracy doesn’t function in a climate of threats and violence.

Continue reading …
Pawlenty: Federal Government Should Not Raise the Debt Ceiling

Click here to view this media More irresponsible talk out of one of our likely Republican presidential candidates. Touting His Government Shutdown In 2005, Pawlenty Says GOP Lawmakers ‘Should Not Raise The Debt Ceiling’ : Former Governor and likely GOP 2012 presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty (MN), however, readily prescribed this economic kamikaze mission to the GOP today on Fox News Sunday. Pawlenty, whose failure to sign a state budget in 2005 forced 9,000 state employees to stop pubic services for nine days, told host Chris Wallace that GOP lawmakers “should not raise the debt ceiling” and should “take it one step further” by somehow “sequencing the pain of the bill” to prevent default While Pawlenty heralds his 2005 shutdown as a way to force reduced spending, Wallace pointed out that he only ended the shutdown because he “blinked” by raising taxes, specifically a tax on cigarette packs which Pawlenty preferred to call “a health impact fee.” Admitting to the tax hike, Pawlenty said his tenure was still “transformational” in reforming spending and believes he “should’ve let the shutdown run longer” to secure more of his agenda. An agenda, Wallace notes, that will leave the state’s deficit even further in the hole. Despite the devastating effect Pawlenty’s advice would have, at least 11 Republican lawmakers are signing on to freeze the debt limit and at least seven are prepared to shutdown the government to do so. Still, a slew of others are readily threatening to vote against the debt ceiling unless specific, often regressive cuts are made. Joining Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Graham , Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) reiterated that stance today on NBC’s Meet The Press. Insisting that the U.S. credit rating is threatened more by debt than by default, Coburn said he will not vote to raise the debt ceiling unless spending cuts are made. Transcript via Lexis Nexis below the fold. WALLACE: Joining us now to discuss his political future is the former Republican governor of Minnesota, likely presidential candidate, and author of a new book, “Courage to Stand.” Tim Pawlenty. And Governor, welcome back to Fox News Sunday. PAWLENTY: Great to be with you, Chris. WALLACE: Back in 2005, you allowed the government of Minnesota to shut down for nine days because of a disagreement with the Democratic legislature about taxes and spending. WALLACE: Should congressional Republicans take the same tough stance when it comes to raising the debt limit and federal spending? PAWLENTY: Well, what I’ve learned, Chris, after eight years of doing in a very liberal place — I love my state, but it’s liberal in terms of spending and government — is you’ve got to draw some lines in the sands. Chris Christie was just talking about it here a minute ago. It doesn’t mean you always have to go do — you know, have ultimate battle, but you’ve got to be willing to stand up to a culture, to a history, to a pattern — in this case, 21 percent spending in my state for 40 years — and say we’re not doing that anymore. And I’m glad we had that showdown in Minnesota. And as to the federal government, they should not raise the debt ceiling. I believe they should pass legislation, allow them to sequence the spending as the revenues come in to make sure they don’t default, and then have the debate about what other spending can be reduced. WALLACE: But you would say to the Republicans up in that building behind me do not raise the debt limit? PAWLENTY: That’s right. And, in fact, to avoid the default, I would take it one step further, send the president a piece of legislation that authorizes the federal government to sequence the pain of its bills so that we don’t default on the debt obligation and then have the debate about how we reduce the other spending. WALLACE: OK. I want to go back to 2005, though, because this is your — your time in the crucible, if you will. Back then, you ended the shutdown by agreeing to a 75-cent per pack cigarette tax. You called it a — a health impact fee. Governor, didn’t you blink? PAWLENTY: Well, if you look at what I’ve done in Minnesota, all this stuff that the country’s talking about, that the Republican — WALLACE: No, but I’m asking you about that specific stuff. PAWLENTY: Well, we had a compromise, and I picked the one that — one thing that was least harmful to economic growth of the options that we had in front of with us a Democrat legislature. You know, I never had a Republican legislature in my state. And so, yes, we had a 75 percent — a 75-cent pack increase on cigarette fees. But you look at my record overall, it was transformational in terms of reducing spending, reducing taxes, performance pay for teachers, not just talking about the other cuts for example and pension reform but actually doing it, the leading example in the country on the reforming public employee pensions and much more. WALLACE: Well, let me — let me pick up on that because the fact is, you — I mean, I’ve looked at your record. You were a budget hawk. As governor, you reduced the annual increase in spending from 21 percent a year to two percent a year. You issued 299 vetoes. But, as you left office this year, your successor as governor of Minnesota faced a $6 billion deficit, which is a third more than you inherited. PAWLENTY: Well, a couple of things. Forty-eight or 49 of the 50 states have an upcoming deficit, so this is not unique to Minnesota. And, number two, that deficit, projected for the upcoming two years, Chris, assumes a 27 percent increase in state spending. That is preposterous. It is irresponsible. It is reckless. And so, I don’t buy the notion, the premise underneath that that spending should or can go up 27 percent. WALLACE: But — but, I mean, is it — what does it say about it, that you were — went all out to try to cut spending, issued the vetoes and the deficit — I mean, you can talk about the projections, but it certainly hasn’t gone down, and may go up. PAWLENTY: Well, what it does say is in Minnesota and many other states, you got to have a budgeting process that doesn’t have spending on autopilot. So that’s why we have the deficit in our state, there’s a bunch of spending that’s on autopilot. That autopilot feature has to be shut off, and the idea that they’re going to have a 27 percent increase in state spending, I would say, is a flawed premise to begin with. And that’s why we called for budgeting reform in our state as well. But I want to leave you with this point, or make this point. All of the things that the country is facing that — that you talk about on this show and many others, on spending, on taxes, on pensions, on school reform, we did in Minnesota. There’s only four governors in the country that got an “A” from the tough grading Cato Institute, and I’m one of them. I’m the only one in the north half of the country, by the way.

Continue reading …