Click here to view this media Like Steve Benen, I’m beginning to wonder if our favorite Big-Time Wingnuts are about to implode under the critical mass of their own overpowering wingnuttery. It seem as though Sarah Palin’s bizarre “WTF” rant of the other night — while not particularly spectacular in the context of a political career rich with embarrassing moments — may have been the pebble that finally tipped even her reflexive defenders in the other direction. (You sure can’t find anyone outside of Planet Palin who will defend it.) Then there’s Glenn Beck in the past couple of days. Conor Friedersdorf’s reaction reflected the consensus: “the fact that Roger Ailes and his associates air this kind of nonsense –couched in these kinds of assurances! – is indefensible.” As Benen says : Over the last year or so, Fox News’ Glenn Beck has lost about a third of his audience, which is a pretty significant drop, and may very well lead the deranged media personality to think of ways to bring viewers back. One way, for example, may be for Beck to be even more creative when sharing crazy visions of global affairs. Yesterday, the strange man did his best to explain events in Egypt with a take that really has to be seen to be believed. Chris Hayes called it “a tour de force of paranoid ignorance,” which sums it up nicely. As you can see, all he’s really doing is reinforcing what even some of Beck’s Believers are now beginning to realize: that he’s an ignoramus peddling cockamamie conspiracy theories with no regard to facts or truthfulness. You see, Beck believes that events in Egypt are the culmination of conspiratorial forces he’s been railing about for some time now — essentially revolving around an obscure book by French anarchists that nobody is actually reading, The Coming Insurrection . Basically, Beck foresees a Middle Eastern “Caliphate” overtaking Europe and China controlling big chunks of new territory, all fueled by a “Marxist” and “Islamist” conspiracy: I believe that I can make a case in the end that there are three powers that you will see really emerge. One, a Muslim caliphate that controls the Mideast and parts of Europe. Two, China, that will control Asia, the southern half of Africa, part of the Middle East, Australia, maybe New Zealand, and God only knows what else. And Russia, which will control all of the old former Soviet Union bloc, plus maybe the Netherlands. I’m not really sure. But their strong arm is coming. That leaves us and South America. What happens to us? Then Beck went on Bill O’Reilly’s show and explained the nutshell version: BECK: No, I think we’re actually possibly the witnessing Archduke Ferdinand moment. Archduke Ferdinand was the guy who was killed — shot, a few months later started the First World War. I think we’re in real danger. … BECK: I understand that, but what you’re not taking into account is that that is what the average person thinks, just like the average person on the street of — of Cairo thinks they’re swept up in some freedom movement. It is not about freedom. It is being orchestrated by the Marxists, communists and primarily also the Muslim Brotherhood. Sean Easter and Todd Gregory at Media Matters have a thorough roundup of the madness, and conclude by observing: All of this was offered up in service of his theory that the protests in Egypt are the manifestation of The Coming Insurrection , an obscure book that French police believe was written by a member of a small group of anarchists. Beck has repeatedly described the anonymous author (or authors) of the book as “communists.” He’s tied George Soros and President Obama to The Coming Insurrection , as well. So, a diverse group of the Egyptian people are in the streets protesting an autocratic leader, and Glenn Beck has decided that this is directly connected to an anonymously written anarchist tract from France that he’s been obsessing about for the past two years? Normally, we are in the business of debunking the falsehoods and smears that Beck promotes. But how do you debunk pronouncements that quite obviously bear no relationship to reality? The real question is: Why would anyone ever take this man seriously on any subject?
Continue reading …Emboldened by the army’s support, people pour on to the streets to demand the president’s departure Ten days ago 50 people demonstrating on a Cairo student campus would have been regarded as an event out of the ordinary, something to be quickly crushed by the Egyptian police. That was then. Today hundreds of thousands of people crammed themselves into Cairo’s central Tahrir Square to call for an end to President Hosni Mubarak’s three decades in power – and the government security forces were nowhere to be seen. The protesters hung vast banners from buildings, beat drums and chanted, they picnicked with their children on patches of scrubby grass, and walked round the square holding up vast Egyptian flags. Most of all they called for their president to go, in a multitude of different ways. “Wake up, Mubarak, this is your last day.” they chanted. “We won’t leave until you do.” Others shouted simply “Go away” and “Leave”, using a dismissive Arabic expression. Their banners – scrawled in Arabic, English, French and Spanish, a nod to the international audience that is watching this extraordinary uprising unfold – said “Game over” and “Leave now and we’ll leave you alone”. Above the huge and swelling crowd a helicopter circled, feeding live images to Mubarak’s senior security officials. They will have seen the crush below, but not the detail in it: the families and friends, the bearded Islamic students, work colleagues, the rich, the middle-class and the poor – putting hands on shoulders to move through the vast press of bodies in snaking lines. They won’t have seen the happy chance meetings of friends and colleagues; the intense pockets of debate about the future of the revolution that broke out on dozens of street corners; the faces lit up with the exhilaration of free expression and free assembly, as exciting as for any crowd at a football match or a rock concert. It was, as one banner had it, a festival of freedom. But what was truly extraordinary about this gathering was how far Egypt had come in a week. People who once would not have thought of coming to protest, who would never have thought of speaking ill of a president who has ruled for 30 years or given their names to foreign journalists, have found a voice. So they filed in their hundreds and thousands through checkpoints run by the army and checkpoints run by volunteers – who frisked all male protesters, checking their IDs to ensure that no plain clothes police officers could infiltrate the crowd. The volunteers passed out printed leaflets from soldiers asking for a peaceful assembly. Young men came with free boxes of mango juice and water to hand out, round bread and biscuits, cheese and dates. Others moved through the throng collecting litter and holding up signs for the camera. “The barrier of fear was broken last Friday,” said Ahmed Lofti, who works for the oil contractor Halliburton, referring to the day that demonstrators pushed Egypt’s riot police triumphantly off Cairo’s streets. It is a victory over fear that was assisted by a declaration from Egypt’s army last night that it would not use force against those who came out on the streets today. And so they came in numbers vaster than anyone had predicted: gathering not only in the capital, but also in Alexandria, Suez and other major cities. The million-person march, Egypt’s protest movement called it. And even if it is not certain whether they reached that figure, it is clear that a transformation has taken place. Commenting on the military’s assurances regarding protesters’ security, Muhammad Warsi, a 60-year-old surgeon, said: “The high command of the army delivered a hidden message. “It is the same message that the elites of the country’s society are delivering. They’re saying [to Mubarak], ‘We loved you 30 years ago. We don’t want to humiliate you. We don’t want you to end like [Romanian president] Nicolae Ceausescu. Go in peace.” “This is a new process for us. These are our first steps. We don’t know where we are going yet,” said Mohammed Gaber, an IT engineer in the oil industry. “I’ve worked abroad for most of the last 12 years. I was supposed to be in Tripoli today, but I changed my plans so I could stay and participate in this. To be honest, I’m still surprised. No one expected any of this. If a group of students had gathered, they would have been crushed immediately. Now look at us.” Admiration for Egypt’s youth was a common theme running through the crowd. “I’m ashamed of my generation. We old people sat back and lived through decades of corruption without lifting a finger,” said Aza el-Hadari, a 63-year-old bookshop owner. “This new generation has given me the best years of my life back. “I feel sorry that Mubarak, who was after all a hero of the 1973 war effort, should be reduced to leaving with such little dignity. But he has brought this upon himself; Mubarak will go down in Egyptian history as the president who ordered security forces to fire live bullets into the bodies of his sons and daughters. There’s no way back from that.” Amid the euphoria, though, were small reminders of the individual tragedies that had taken place in the run-up to the day’s events. Azzam Abdel Latif and his wife had erected a poster of their 28-year-old son, Lotfi, along with the autopsy report into his death last Friday during fierce clashes between police and protesters. Lotfi had been returning from work in the neighbourhood of Imbaba, on the west bank of the Nile, when he got caught up in the fighting. He came across a small child who had suffered shrapnel wounds. “He grabbed the boy and went up to remonstrate with a riot policeman, asking why they were firing live bullets into the air at the Egyptian people,” said Latif. “The policeman fired two bullets into my son’s chest and he died instantly.” Latif buried Lotfi the following day and came straight to the square to begin a vigil. He said he had not been a political person before the death of his son, although he did think that constitutional reform was long overdue. Now though, that has changed. “I only had one son and I lost him to these protests; if I did have another, I would tell him to come down and join this. We must bring down Mubarak; if I see the president, I’ll get him myself.” Warsi was sitting on a bench waiting for his daughters, like many other recent additions to Egypt’s burgeoning revolution. He tells a joke with a certain relevance to the day’s events. “OK,” he says, “So Hosni Mubarak is lying on his death bed and his doctor comes and says: ‘Hosni, you have to prepare a message to say goodbye to your people.’ ‘For my people?’ asks Mubarak. ‘Why? Where are the people going?’” Today the answer came – to Tahrir Square, to bid their president of 30 years goodbye. Egypt Middle East Hosni Mubarak Peter Beaumont Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …William Hague tells parliament he will send more flights if needs be as Egypt witnesses biggest anti-government protests so far Britain will send a charter flight to Cairo to bring home British nationals, the foreign secretary announced today, but passengers will have to pay to use the service. Speaking in parliament, William Hague said he had arranged for an aircraft to be sent to supplement commercial travel. The Foreign Office later said it would cost around £300 for a seat on the flight. Days of protests in Egypt have culminated in up to a million people taking to the streets today, the largest demonstration so far against President Hosni Mubarak’s regime. “We have been advising people in Cairo or Alexandria or Suez to leave if they can, if they don’t have any pressing reason to remain,” Hague told parliament . The foreign secretary said the “vast majority” of those seeking to leave have been able to do so on commercial flights, but he added: “I have decided to send a charter flight to Cairo tomorrow, to allow those who wish to leave to do so. I will send further flights if we see a need to do so.” Although the flight will leave the UK tomorrow, it will not return from Cairo until Thursday, a spokeswoman for the Foreign Office said. Departure and arrival times had not been finalised yet. The foreign office took to Twitter and its website to warn that there would be a £300 charge for using the charter flight. Passengers will be able to pay at the airport, it said. The Foreign Office has advised against all but essential travel to Cairo, Alexandria, Luxor and Suez. Those wishing to travel on the Foreign Office’s charter flight should register by calling 020 7008 8765. Egypt Middle East Egypt Adam Gabbatt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Time magazine's Brian Walsh couldn't write up a story on the need for more electricity in developing countries without shoe-horning in a dire warning about climate change. In a January 31st story entitled “Building
Continue reading …We put together a short reel of some behind the scenes footage from the White House last week, before and after our YouTube Interview with President Obama. To see the full interview, click here . (thanks to Arun Chaudhary for the footage from inside the White House Diplomatic Room)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Utah has a state tree (the blue spruce), a state insect (the honey bee), and last week the Browning M1911 handgun came one step closer to becoming the official state firearm. On a one-time-only holiday honoring Utah gun-maker John Moses Browning, a bill that would designate the handgun as a state symbol was endorsed by a state House committee on the way to becoming Utah law. “It’s an implement of freedom that has defended America for 100 years,” bill sponsor Rep. Carl Wimmer (R-Herriman) said. “This firearm is Utah.” Some see the bill an insensitive considering a recent mass shooting in the neighboring state of Arizona that left six dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in the hospital. “Semiautomatic pistols are the weapons of choice for those who are committing massacres,” Steven Gunn, a board member of the Gun Violence Prevention Center of Utah, told the committee. “Is this the time to adopt as a symbol of the state the same kind of weapon used to kill all these people?” Only two state representatives, Jennifer Seelig (D-Salt Lake City) and Marie Poulson (D-Cottonwood Heights), opposed the bill, which was approved 9-2. “I think a lot of people think this is a big waste of time,” Seelig told MSNBC Monday. “Particularly since we are facing some economic challenges in this state.” “If we want to honor an historical figure that’s great. Let’s do this another way than going through some official designation of a state symbol. A state symbol is supposed to be something that unifies the population in the state, and guns certainly are a divisive type of unit, and it’s polarizing,” she added. “We do not need that.” “The state bird, the beehive, they’re fun and engaging,” Rep. Carol Spackman Moss (D-Salt Lake City) told The Standard-Examiner . “Students will be coloring and drawing pictures and answering quizzes about guns and that seems inappropriate to me.” If Utah does adopt the handgun as a state symbol, the state will join the likes of the nation of Mozambique, which features an AK-47 on their official flag.
Continue reading …In this 60 Minutes interview, Steve Kroft was no Stephen Colbert. (The Business Insider said, “Steve Kroft came across like a severe scolding parent, who needs help programming the VCR.”) Julian Assange came across as the knowledgeable one : Kroft: One bank, Bank of America, had its stock go down three to five percent based on a rumor, maybe it’s a rumor, maybe you know more about it, that you had the contents of a five gigabyte hard drive belonging to one of its executives. Do you have a five gigabyte hard drive? Assange: I won’t make any comment in relation to that upcoming publication. Kroft: You’re certainly not denying it. Assange: You know, there’ll be a process of elimination if we denied some and admitted others. Kroft: So it might not be Bank of America and you’re just gonna let them squirm until you get ready to… Assange: I think it’s great. We have all these banks squirming, thinking maybe it’s them. Kroft: You seem to enjoy stirring things up. Assange: When you see abusive organizations suffer the consequences as a result of their abuse, and you see victims elevated, it’s, yes, that’s a very pleasurable activity to be involved in. Kroft: I mean you see yourself as a check on the power of the United States and other big countries in the world. And in the process of doing that, you have now become powerful yourself. Who is the check on you? Assange: It is our sources who choose to provide us with information or not, depending on how they see our actions. It is our donors who choose to give us money or not. This organization cannot survive for even a few months without the ongoing support of the public.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Egyptian journalist Mona Eltahawy joined The Dylan Ratigan Show for his daily rant to explain why America should support the protests in Egypt.
Continue reading …This is one of those situations, is it not, where you read 20 things and you think good point, fair point, hadn’t thought of that, interesting way to look at it, and at the end of it all your head is kind of spinning. Through it all, though, the one thing I’m suspicious of is heavy moral throwdowns by pundits. Obama must do this or that. X or Y or Z proves the absolute hypocrisy of America, or whomever. Nonsense. Nobody writing those kinds of things knows what’s going on inside. Granted, what’s going on outside is important: America should send the right signals to the protestors and the rest of the world. But presumably, there’s lots going on that none of us knows about. It would be my guess that especially after today, with those massive protests, Washington is telling Cairo privately that violent repression is out of the question and will produce severe consequences. I would hope that Obama makes another statement, a few ticks stronger than his last one, in the next couple of days. Meanwhile, these paragraphs from today’s NYT story about Washington sizing up ElBaradei as a potential leader of Egypt rang all too true: But now, the biggest questions for the Obama administration are Mr. ElBaradei’s views on issues related to Israel, Egypt and the United States. For instance, both the United States and Israel have counted on the Egyptians to enforce their part of the blockade of Gaza, which is controlled by the militant Islamist group Hamas. But in an interview last June with the London-based Al Quds Al-Arabi, Mr. ElBaradei called the Gaza blockade “a brand of shame on the forehead of every Arab, every Egyptian and every human being.” He called on his government, and on Israel, to end the blockade, which Israeli and Egyptian officials argue is needed to ensure security. Ah. Now we’re learning something important here. The Times goes on to detail the deep distrust of ElBaradei among neocons. Cirincione, fyi, is a good guy: Joseph Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund and a friend of Mr. ElBaradei, said Monday that Mr. ElBaradei wanted Israel to join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Israel, along with India and Pakistan, is not a signatory. One senior Obama administration official said that it was not lost on the administration that Mr. ElBaradei’s contentious relations with the Bush administration helped explain why he was now being viewed by some as a credible face of the opposition in Egypt. “Ironically, the fact that ElBaradei crossed swords with the Bush administration on Iraq and Iran helps him in Egypt, and God forbid we should do anything to make it seem like we like him,” said Philip D. Zelikow, former counselor at the State Department during the Bush years. For all of his tangles with the Bush administration, Mr. ElBaradei, an international bureaucrat well known in diplomatic circles, is someone whom the United States can work with, Mr. Zelikow said. However, he allowed, “Some people in the administration had a jaundiced view of his work.” Among them was John Bolton, the former Bush administration United States ambassador to the United Nations, who routinely clashed with Mr. ElBaradei on Iran. “He is a political dilettante who is excessively pro-Iran,” he complained. Meanwhile, at The Nation, Ari Berman notes : ElBaradei’s emergence has angered pro-Mubarak neoconservatives, such as Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vide president of the Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, which is closely aligned with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. “There is a myth being created that ElBaradei is a human rights activist,” Hoenlein told an Orthodox Jewish website on Sunday. “He is a stooge of Iran, and I don’t use the term lightly. When he was the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, for which he got a Nobel Peace Prize, he fronted for them, he distorted the reports.” So this is what’s going on, probably. The administration is feeling some heat from these kinds of sources. Ultimately, Obama and Clinton do not, I would expect and hope, agree with Bolton and Hoenlein. And ultimately, I would expect and hope, ultimately meaning pretty soon, they will embrace Mubarak’s ouster more publicly. But these are complicated things. I know that this thread is now going to be full of indignant fulmination against Israel. That’s not my intent. My intent is to show that there are a lot of factors in play here. I want to be clear that I obviously do not think the administration should sit on its hands here for Israel’s sake; what’s going on in Tahrir Square is inspiring and quite clearly deserves the support, issued in the right way at the right time, by the United States of America. Rather, I am saying that the US, given its role in the world, has to weigh things more carefully than any other country in the world does before it speaks and acts. I think we’ll do the right thing, but the right thing must be done at the right time in this case. Obama administration US foreign policy Egypt Israel Michael Tomasky guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …