Partial preliminary figures show high turnout and favour eliminating restrictions on political rights and civil liberties Partial referendum results from a third of Egypt’s provinces yesterday showed a massive turnout and a vote overwhelmingly in favour of constitutional changes to eliminate restrictions on political rights and civil liberties . According to results issued by judges at polling centres, 11 out of 29 provinces showed between 65% and 90% of voters were in favour of the changes. Opponents feared the referendum’s passage would allow the Muslim Brotherhood to win out over Egypt’s dozens of new political parties in the forthcoming presidential and parliamentary vote. The partial preliminary results also showed 70% turnout at many polling centres, a massive showing after decades of political apathy in response to repression. Millions of Egyptians voted freely on Saturday for the first time in more than half a century, having waited for hours to cast their ballots on the package of constitutional changes. Young people traded mobile phone pictures of ink-stained fingers that proved they had voted. Others called relatives to boast of casting the first vote of their lives. In the well-off Cairo neighborhood of Maadi, a man hoisted his elderly father on his shoulder and carried him to a polling station. The first test of Egypt’s transition to democracy offered ominous hints of widening sectarian division, however. Many were drawn to the polls in a massive, last-minute effort by the Muslim Brotherhood after the widely despised National Democratic Party (NDP) of former president Hosni Mubarak, who was ousted last month in a national popular uprising. Critics say that would allow the Brotherhood and NDP to easily beat the dozens of political groups born out of the anti-Mubarak uprising, dividing power between former regime loyalists and supporters of a fundamentalist state – a nightmare scenario for both western powers and many inside Egypt. Among those most fearful of the Brotherhood’s rising power are Egypt’s estimated 8 million Coptic Christians, whose leaders rallied the faithful to vote against the changes. The NDP is blamed for corruption and fraud that marred every election during Mubarak’s 29-year rule, and its members have been accused of attempting to disrupt Egypt’s transition to democracy for fear of losing further power. The constitutional amendments were drawn up by a panel of military-appointed legal scholars and were intended to bring just enough change to the current constitution – which was adopted in 1971 and suspended by the military after it came to power – to ensure that forthcoming presidential and parliamentary elections are free and fair. In an interview with Egyptian newspaper El-Shorouk, a top member of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces said that the council will issue ‘a constitutional declaration’ just after the announcement of the final vote to lay down next steps. He said that if the results were in favor of change, then a timetable will be set for parliament and presidential elections. If the majority voted against, the armed forces might remain in power for up to two years. Voters were asked to vote yes or no for the whole package of nine changes, which would also impose presidential term limits and curtail 30-year-old emergency laws that give police near-unlimited powers. Of the 10 provinces, 90% of voters in Fayoum were in favor of the constitutional changes, while 60% of el-Wadi el-Gedid voted against. On Saturday, reform campaigner Mohamed ElBaradei and a group of his supporters were pelted with rocks, bottles and cans outside a polling center at Cairo’s Mokattam district in an attack he blamed on followers of the old regime. The day was otherwise almost entirely peaceful. Hundreds of Egyptians formed lines outside polling centers before they opened. They snaked along the streets in Cairo and other cities, with men and women standing in separate lines as is customary in the conservative and mainly Muslim nation. Saturday’s vote was by far the most free since the military seized power in a 1952 coup, toppling the monarchy and ending decades of a multi-party system that functioned while Britain was Egypt’s colonial master. Only men with military backgrounds have ruled Egypt since. While Mubarak’s departure has left Egyptians euphoric about their newfound freedoms, many are also worried about the potential for social tensions and instability. Christian-Muslim clashes this month left at least 13 killed and more than 100 wounded in the worst sectarian clashes in years. On 1 January, a suicide bomber blew himself up outside a church in the Mediterranean port city of Alexandria, killing at least 22 worshippers and wounding scores. A few days later, a policeman shot dead an elderly Christian man on a train. The Brotherhood, which has strongly campaigned for the adoption of the changes, advocates the installment of an Islamic government in Egypt. The ambivalence of its position on what role women and minority Christians play under their hoped-for Islamic government – such as whether they would be permitted to run for president or be judges – worry large segments of society. In the province of Luxor, thousands of Muslim Brotherhood supporters and Salafis, zealous adherents to practices from Islam’s early days, held separate demonstrations in the city center to campaign for votes in favour of reform. Churches handed out leaflets to worshippers calling on them to vote against reform. To the north in the province of Assiut, home to one of the country’s largest Christian communities, priests organised buses to ferry worshippers from churches to polling centers to cast their no votes. Islamists using loudspeakers in pick-up trucks roaming Assiut’s streets were calling on voters to vote in favour of reform. The attack on ElBaradei, the former head of the UN nuclear watchdog agency, forced him to flee without casting his ballot. The crowd smashed his car windows and shouted: “You traitor– we don’t want you”. ElBaradei supporters at the scene retaliated by chanting: “We want you”. The Nobel laureate later tweeted that “organised thugs” were to blame for the attack. In a second Twitter posting, he said Mubarak regime figures were seeking to undermine the revolution. More than half of Egypt’s 80 million people are eligible to vote. Egypt Middle East Muslim Brotherhood guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …George Osborne’s reform of taxation could create new system of winners and losers, tax experts warn Government plans to merge national insurance and income tax expected in this week’s budget could be “politically explosive” and create a new system of winners and losers, tax experts have warned. The chancellor, George Osborne, will signal his intention to reform the two taxes as part of a drive to simplify taxation for business by reducing bureaucracy and cutting costs when he unveils his budget for growth on Wednesday. Reform will be trumpeted by Osborne as a way for people to see more clearly how much they are being taxed. Mike Warburton, tax director at Grant Thornton, the accountancy firm, said: “The plan is a good one in principle as it can’t be right that people’s earnings are subjected to two different taxes. But the issue is politically charged because an amalgamation of the two taxes would mean basic rate taxpayers would see their income tax jump from the current rate of 20% to 32%, to take account of the 12% NI rate that comes into force on 5 April. Psychologically, that could be difficult to swallow, so changes would have to be very carefully explained.” Higher rate taxpayers would see their rate jump from 40% to 52%. Over the years, Conservative and Labour governments have increased national insurance to avoid being accused of raising personal taxes. Warburton said the reality was “there is no separate national insurance pot that goes towards paying unemployment benefits or the state pension; NI is all part of general taxation”. He said that merging income tax and NI could create winners, such as stay-at-home mothers, whose state pension would no longer be linked to how much NI they pay. But losers could be pensioners or individuals who do not work, whose savings would be taxed at a new, higher rate of income tax. It could also hit people who pay the full amount into their pension over their working lives, as they would no longer qualify for an “enhanced’ state pension. Trade unions have warned that tax shakeups for workers must be carefully scrutinised as reform could be used as a way to increase tax receipts. Chris Sanger, head of tax policy at Ernst & Young, said reforming the system could be “politically sensitive” as employee taxation would be more visible and people would have a clearer idea of their tax bill. But he supported the idea as it would cut costs and paperwork for businesses. “It is pointless to have two separate employee taxes with two different sets of rules and regulations. Many millions of pounds could be saved and the government are absolutely right to look into it.” Sanger said employer NI contributions could be scrapped and replaced by an additional payroll tax. Experts point out there is no way that employer NI could be scaled down as the ration of pensioners to people of working age is forecast to jump from 25% to 43% over the next three decades. In a report on small business tax commissioned by the chancellor last July, the Office of Tax Simplification called for an end to the parallel systems of NI and income tax. “The overwhelming conclusion is that genuine and long-lasting simplification can only be brought about through structural change to the entire UK tax system,” the report said. Income tax George Osborne Budget National insurance Tax Richard Wachman guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: Courtesy of Huffington Post (Jerry Moran/Stuart Smith oilspillaction.com) While the media is busy assuring their audiences that we still need nuclear energy despite catastrophic accidents potential, environmentalists would like you to remember we still have issues in the Gulf of Mexico from another one of our short-sighted energy policies . The Coast Guard is investigating reports of a potentially large oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico not far from the Deepwater Horizon site. According to a knowledgeable source, the slick was sighted by a helicopter pilot on Friday and is about 100 miles long. A fishing boat captain said he went through the slick yesterday and it was strong enough to make his eyes burn. According to the Times Picayune, the Coast Guard has confirmed they are investigating a potentially large 100 mile slick about 30 miles offshore. They are going to a site near the Matterhorn well site about 20 miles north of the BP Deepwater Horizon site, according to the paper. The Matterhorn field includes includes a deepwater drilling platform owned by W&T Technology . It was acquired last year from TotalFinaElf E&P. I’m sure that the GOP will insist that this has nothing to do with the Deepwater Horizon site and is strictly a coincidence. And of course, by no means should this force us to reassess the wisdom of deep water drilling. To which, you can be sure, the administration will shrug and acquiesce. Because why should we worry about a fragile eco-system and search for alternative fuel sources (thereby adding jobs and strengthening the economy) when we can instead live in the back pocket of Big Oil?
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Glenn Beck summarizes the terrible news that Socialists are now demonstrating in Chicago, the camera pans to a sign calling for the US to open their f*&king borders at about 8 seconds in. Accidental or on purpose? Of course, he behaves as though it’s a complete accident, facepalming and saying “Oops, don’t show that to my audience!” In my opinion, it was entirely intentional to drive home his theory to his fearful doddering audience that Socialists are crude, profane, anti-American idiots. I included the rest of the clip here, because the next part is just bizarre. Evidently in Beck’s world, electric power and heat are privileges. His reasoning for this seems to be related to the fact that there was no electric power or heat in the United States when it was formed. Um…ok. I use Beck as a bellwether for the next wave of conservative lunacy, and more is coming. As usual, the targets are those least able to defend themselves — the poor. Beck kicks off the meme with this: Not good. They’re ready for revolution, and they’re ready for revolution now. It’s not good. In Detroit, the Committee Against Utility Shutoffs has staged a protest. The Committee is a branch of the Socialist Equality Party and they are saying now utilities are also a social right. I’m not sure exactly how that works because — [stutters] — except for the last 150 years we didn’t have any power at all, so how is that a universal right? I guess Glenn wants us to go back to huntin’ bear and dressing in bearskin, eh? As utility companies are increasingly privatized and/or run by private concerns, rates go up. As rates go up, those least able to afford them are shut off. Programs like LIHEAP are stretched beyond their capacity as it is, and speculators continue to drive prices up, shutting more and more people out of their ability to pay. Watch for it to become the next big target. First they come for the jobs. Then they hit the pensions, home equity and savings. Finally, they shut off the lights. And Glenn Beck laughs.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Glenn Beck summarizes the terrible news that Socialists are now demonstrating in Chicago, the camera pans to a sign calling for the US to open their f*&king borders at about 8 seconds in. Accidental or on purpose? Of course, he behaves as though it’s a complete accident, facepalming and saying “Oops, don’t show that to my audience!” In my opinion, it was entirely intentional to drive home his theory to his fearful doddering audience that Socialists are crude, profane, anti-American idiots. I included the rest of the clip here, because the next part is just bizarre. Evidently in Beck’s world, electric power and heat are privileges. His reasoning for this seems to be related to the fact that there was no electric power or heat in the United States when it was formed. Um…ok. I use Beck as a bellwether for the next wave of conservative lunacy, and more is coming. As usual, the targets are those least able to defend themselves — the poor. Beck kicks off the meme with this: Not good. They’re ready for revolution, and they’re ready for revolution now. It’s not good. In Detroit, the Committee Against Utility Shutoffs has staged a protest. The Committee is a branch of the Socialist Equality Party and they are saying now utilities are also a social right. I’m not sure exactly how that works because — [stutters] — except for the last 150 years we didn’t have any power at all, so how is that a universal right? I guess Glenn wants us to go back to huntin’ bear and dressing in bearskin, eh? As utility companies are increasingly privatized and/or run by private concerns, rates go up. As rates go up, those least able to afford them are shut off. Programs like LIHEAP are stretched beyond their capacity as it is, and speculators continue to drive prices up, shutting more and more people out of their ability to pay. Watch for it to become the next big target. First they come for the jobs. Then they hit the pensions, home equity and savings. Finally, they shut off the lights. And Glenn Beck laughs.
Continue reading …Feral German child who was kept as a pet in George I’s court had Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, research into portrait suggests The condition that affected Peter the Wild Boy, a feral child found abandoned in a German forest and kept as a pet at the courts of George I and II, has been identified more than 200 years after his death. Peter’s charming smile, seen in his portrait painted in the 1720s by William Kent on the king’s grand staircase at Kensington Palace, was the vital clue. Lucy Worsley, the historian at Historic Royal Palaces who has been researching Peter’s strange life, suspected from contemporary accounts that he was autistic. She showed the portrait and gave the description of his physical characteristics and odd habits to Phil Beale, professor of genetics at the Institute of Child Health. Beale ran the symptoms through his database of chromosomal disorders, and came up with a diagnosis of Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, which was identified in 1978, centuries after Peter’s death. Its most distinctive effect is clearly shown in Peter’s portrait, his curvy Cupid’s bow lips. Other Pitt-Hopkins symptoms shared by Peter included short stature, coarse hair – the portrait shows him with a thick, curly mop – drooping eyelids and thick lips. He was also said to have two fingers fused together, which may have been clubbed fingers, also sometimes a symptom. His mental development would also have been affected. Together his symptoms explain to Worsley – who will discuss the discovery on the BBC Radio 4 Making History programme on Tuesday – how he ended up alone and naked in a forest. “Certainly this was enough to explain why he was abandoned by his family, and once captured in the forest like a wild animal, why he was thrown into the local house of correction with the vagrants and thieves,” said Worsley. “He was actually quite lucky that King George I heard about him, and summoned him to court, even though there he was treated like a performing dog rather than a damaged little boy.” Worsley uncovered Peter’s history while researching the courtiers and royal servants who appear in Kent’s wall painting at Kensington Palace for her book Courtiers, published last year. The last piece of the puzzle has been solved now. Worsley says she has been fascinated by Peter, who capered like Shakespeare’s Puck in the solemn and etiquette stifled court. The servants had difficulty persuading him to walk instead of scuttling about on hands and knees, to sleep in a bed and to wear his green suit and red socks – he was terrified when he first saw a man taking off stockings, believing he was peeling off his skin. George I gave Peter to his daughter-in-law Caroline, who was interested in science and philosophy, at a time when debate was raging about nature versus nurture, rational intelligence and the soul. He lived on at court when she became Queen. Although he was treated kindly by his guardian, the Scottish doctor John Arbuthnot – by his side in the painting – he never learned to speak more than his name, and he wore a brass collar like a slave or a dog so he could be restored to his “owners” if he wandered off. When he first came to England he was a media sensation in Georgian London, the subject of newspaper articles, poems and ballads – often satirising the extravagance and tortuous etiquette of the court. One mockingly described him as “The Most Wonderful Wonder that ever appeared to the Wonder of the British Nation”. When Jonathan Swift – suspected as co-author of the wonder pamphlet – was called to meet Caroline, he commented that since she was interested in a wild German boy, she also wanted to meet a wild Irish cleric. Peter long outlived his royal patrons, and after Caroline’s death in 1737 was sent to live on a farm in Hertfordshire owned by a retired courtier, where he lived into his 70s on a pension of £35 a year. He was buried in the churchyard of St Mary’s at Northchurch near Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire. His simple gravestone reads: “Peter the Wild Boy 1785″. Worsley said: “He was a famous figure in Georgian times and he hasn’t been forgotten today, people still lay flowers on his grave. “It’s hugely satisfying to winkle another secret out of the painting, which I’ve been obsessed with for some years now.” Painting Monarchy Germany Radio 4 Genetics Maev Kennedy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Hip-hop star sustained wound to his hand while campaigning for one of the contenders in Sunday’s presidential vote Hip-hop star Wyclef Jean has received a gunshot wound to the hand while campaigning for a fellow performer who is running for president in Haiti . The shooting happened in the Delmas area near the capital of Port-au-Prince on Saturday night, said Joe Mignon, senior programme director for Jean’s Yele Foundation. Jean was treated at a hospital and later released, Mignon said. Jean, a native of Haiti who rocketed to fame as a member of the hip-hop trio the Fugees, is in his home country to support fellow musician and friend Michel “Sweet Micky” Martelly, who is contesting a run-off vote taking place on Sunday against former first lady Mirlande Manigat. Last week, Jean participated in a Martelly campaign concert in Port-au-Prince. “We are happy that Wyclef is okay but we continue to pray for him and for a peaceful and fair election today in Haiti,” said the Rev Al Sharpton, who has worked with Jean on educational issues and bringing aid to Haiti after the devastating January 2010 earthquake. Rosemond said: “It is clear that enemies of progressive change in Haiti are behind the shooting of Wyclef – those that don’t want to accept that a monumental change is inevitable for the betterment of the Haitian people. This incident will not deter those of us that see the election as crucial to the country’s future.” Haiti Wyclef Jean guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Bill Maher in the middle of last year's crisis in the Gulf of Mexico wrongly stated on national television that Brazil had gotten off of oil 30 years ago. With great irony, President Obama announced Saturday that he wants America to become a major purchaser of – wait for it! – Brazilian oil drilled offshore: Traders are also concerned about protests and tensions in a number of other oil-producing nations in the region. Mr Obama spoke of the US's desire to secure more of its oil from Brazil in future after talks with his counterpart, President Dilma Rousseff, in Brasilia at the start of a two-day visit to Latin America's biggest country. “I have told her that the United States wants to be a major customer, which can be a win-win for both our countries,” he said. Brazil possesses some of the world's biggest offshore oil reserves in the pre-salt area off its south-east coast. “Brazil possesses some of the world's biggest offshore oil reserves.” Got that, Bill? Yet, that's not the only media irony involving this announcement. When Obama suspended drilling in the Gulf as a result of the BP spill, oil-hating media cheered like they had won the Super Bowl. The President has since proposed offshore drilling limits that Republicans are fighting against. If offshore drilling is such an awful thing for the environment, shouldn't it be awful everywhere? With this in mind, it's going to be very interesting to see how Obama's Brazilian proposal gets covered, particularly given recent right-wing calls for more American domestic drilling. With oil firmly over $100 a barrel, and gasoline quickly heading to $4 a gallon, citizens are waiting for a coherent energy policy from Washington that addresses this issue. This became crucial after last week's news that inflation grew more in February than in any single month since 1974. Now add in continued strife in the Middle East as well as Saturday's military action in Libya, and oil prices aren't coming down any time soon. Lest we not forget the renewed No Nukes calls predictably coming from the Left and their media minions in response to the nuclear crisis in Japan. This leaves Obama in the precarious position of having to formulate an energy policy on multiple fronts as our nation stuggles to stay afloat in an economy that could easily slip back into recession if the right decisions aren't made. As this is all happening less than ten months before the first presidential primaries and caucuses, one has to wonder how his fans in the press are going to report energy moves by Obama that could be economically sound but not “environmentally” so. Again, consider this announcement out of Brazil. Although increasing oil imports from that region reduces our dependence on Middle East crude, it most certainly won't fly well with environmentalists opposed to all offshore drilling. More importantly, how does the White House stick to proposed limits in our own waters as we purchase oil from Brazil's? Assuming that happens, how do the Obama-loving media rationalize that hypocrisy to prevent voters from seeing through it? In the end, this announcement out of Brazil has created a lot of work not just for the administration but also so-called journalists that desperately want Obama to get reelected. Sure is going to be fun watching this tap dance. (H/T Weasel Zippers )
Continue reading …Entertainer Michel Martelly and ex-first lady Mirlande Manigat vie for post as UN says voting has improved since first-round chaos Voting in Haiti’s presidential run-off started slowly in some places, with foreign donors hoping the poll would produce the stability needed to rebuild the earthquake-crippled nation. In the wrecked capital Port-au-Prince, several polling stations were unable to open on time because materials such as ink to mark voters’ fingers and labels to mark the urns had not arrived, witnesses said. Arguments also broke out over which officials and party representatives should be there. As groups of Haitians waited to vote, polling officials scrambled to get the stations ready. Blue-helmeted Brazilian UN troops guarded voting centres with Haitian police, and white UN armoured vehicles rumbled through the streets, many still strewn with debris left from last year’s earthquake. The election presents Haiti’s 4.7 million voters with a choice between a political newcomer, energetic entertainer and singer Michel Martelly, 50, and former first lady Mirlande Manigat, 70, a law professor and opposition matriarch. The run-off followed a chaotic first round vote on 28 November that dissolved quickly into fraud allegations and unrest. The United Nations, which is supporting the election, says voting improvements should better ensure a clear, credible outcome for the run-off in one of the world’s poorest and most disaster-prone states. “I need a president to change the situation of the country,” said Adeline Hyppolite, 50, a small trader, who cast her ballot in the Petionville district of the capital. “We are hoping for a better life … but only God knows. We hope we’ll find the change we’re looking for,” she added, saying her husband had been disabled in the earthquake. The Caribbean state desperately needs a capable leadership and government to steer a post-quake reconstruction that requires billions of dollars of foreign assistance. “This is the first time in Haitian history that they will have a run-off election, a second round, so I think the product of this election will be a legitimate one that will have the support of the majority of the Haitian people and that alone is already an asset for the next government,” Edmond Mulet, the UN’s top official in Haiti, told Reuters. UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon and other international leaders appealed for a calm, transparent vote. Weighing on many Haitians’ minds as they cast their ballots will be the reappearance of a political heavyweight, former president Jean-Bertrand Aristide, who arrived back from exile on Friday . The return of the charismatic leftwing populist and former Catholic priest who still commands a big following in Haiti was opposed by the United States and United Nations as potentially disruptive to the polls. But Aristide is not a candidate and aides have said he will stay out of politics. Although Aristide, who was driven into exile by a 2004 rebellion, has not clearly endorsed any candidate, many voters have been trying to interpret who he favours in what is expected to be a close-fought run-off. Nevertheless, recent opinion polls have shown Martelly slightly ahead of Manigat. With banners welcoming Aristide, the slogans of the rival candidates were plastered on walls. Martelly’s ” tet kale ” slogan, a Creole play on words that refers to his shaven head and also means “all the way” to convey his promise of forceful change, contrasts with Manigat’s more homely ” banm manman’m ” (give me Mummy) slogan that seeks to bolster her image of experience and responsibility. Reflecting ex-president Aristide’s enduring image as a champion of the poor, many Haitians said that if he were on the ballot they would vote for him. Under Haiti’s election law, the Provisional Electoral Council is due to announce preliminary results from the run-off on 31 March, with final results being confirmed on 16 April. Mulet acknowledged this long wait for results ran the risk of rival camps stirring up supporters with noisy claims of victory or fraud – such claims in the first round triggered street protests. But he was confident UN forces supporting Haiti’s police could control the situation. Haiti United Nations Ban Ki-moon guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Watch Michael Palin’s New Europe: War and Peace Full Movie Online Part 1 of 15 Watch Michael Palin’s New Europe: Baltic Summer Movie Online – HD Watch Michael Palin’s New Europe: From Pole to Pole Full Movie Online part 1 Palin Flops in India | FrumForum With due respect to aficionados of the emerging India-US alliance, it is difficult to see how New Delhi qualifies as an appropriate destination for a potential. Sarah Palin Warns Of China's Rise While In India NEW DELHI — U.S. politician Sarah Palin stressed the importance of America’s ties with India, saying they were based on the shared values of freedom and free-market capitalism, while sounding a warning note on China’s rise during a … Sarah Palin Explains 2008 Loss, Blames “The Media… I'm Kidding … ABC News’ Mary Bruce Reports: While speculation continues to mount that Sarah Palin could enter the 2012 presidential race, today at an appearance in India the former vice-presidential candidate reflected on the 2008 race. Palin , in India, Still Mum About Her Presidential Intentions … Speaking in India, Sarah Palin says that “it is time for a woman to become president,” but she said she wasn’t ready to announce her political intentions for 2012. Bill Maher | Sarah Palin is a 'dumb twat' | The Daily Caller … ‘Real Time’ host employs pejorative from yesteryear to attack the former Alaska governor. President says: Palin 's low-profile adviser has high impact. http://bit.ly/eISHHr
Continue reading …