Muammar Gaddafi must be stopped from looking for revenge, claims lord chancellor Kenneth Clarke has ratcheted up government pressure to depose Colonel Gaddafi by warning that the Libyan leader could stage a Lockerbie-style attack in revenge for Britain’s role in the enforcement of the UN resolution if he is left in power. The lord chancellor told the Guardian: “We do have one particular interest in the Maghreb [the western region of North Africa], which is Lockerbie. “The British people have reason to remember the curse of Gaddafi – Gaddafi back in power, the old Gaddafi looking for revenge, we have a real interest in preventing that.” Clarke says in the interview that the UN resolution does not support regime change, adding that he would regard occupation as madness. But his remarks suggest British ministers recognise they now have a direct security interest in Gaddafi’s removal in light of Libya’s involvement in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing which killed 259 people on Pan Am flight 103 and 11 on the ground in the Scottish town. The justice secretary is also extremely frank in admitting the UK government has little idea how long the conflict will take or how it will be resolved. He says: “I am not in the Foreign Office, fortunately, so I am not too worried by my remarks. But I am still not totally convinced anyone knows where we are going now”. His remarks came as a Guardian ICM poll shows a majority of the public oppose British involvement in the military action in Libya: 42% oppose it, compared with 36% who support it. Asked about the purpose of British involvement, 80% support protecting civilians from attack by Gaddafi and 42% said the intervention should help Libyan rebels depose Gaddafi. Clarke himself contends that “the British people will support us for as long as it takes, so long they think we are protecting innocent civilians, many of whom seem to share our values against an evil dictator”. Clarke, who was an opponent of the Iraq war and a critic of “havering” over Bosnia, said the UN resolution on Libya “represented a significant event in the evolution of the world order”. Speaking as the cabinet’s senior lawyer, he said: “What we seem to have almost established in the international law is the humanitarian basis which can, in exceptional cases, justify intervention by the international community.” He admitted victory would be hard to define: “ou cannot answer what is the destination, what it is going to be the moment when you can see the mission is accomplished. It is a little uncertain, but that would have been a dreadful reason for doing nothing.” He added that no expert or pundit had foreseen the democratic uprising in Libya: “I don’t think any of them saw it coming. I don’t think any of them knew why it started or what started it. He said: “We have already achieved a great deal by stopping the imminent invasion of Benghazi in the nick of time. We would have seen a lot of innocent people, some of them inspired by the best motives, being killed and a quite lunatic regime back in power, acting as an inspiration to others who want to imitate him. So we have already achieved something.” He admitted there was a risk that Libya could divide: “There has never been any love lost between Tripoli and Benghazi. I don’t think at the moment, even on the ground in Libya, the average person who is shooting at the other side is quite clear where this is going to wind up.”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media ( Meeting with Robert F. Kennedy, 1968 – Chavez on day 25 of Hunger Strike ) Note: This is a re-post from 2009 in case you missed it the first time around. G.S We often think the situation with Migrant workers is something that’s happen in the past few years. It’s been going on for decades. One of the great voices in the labor movement and champion of migrant workers rights was Cesar Chavez. His endless campaign of organizing for better working conditions and a fair wage for long hours was a lifelong struggle for him, which was often met by overwhelming resistance. But in the end, progress had been made – not perfect, but a solid foundation. His is certainly a legacy that has lived on, long past his death in 1993. Here is an interview, part of the Educational Television Networks nightly news program Newsfront, hosted by Mitchell Kraus on May 17, 1968. Chavez is joined by Junior Senator Harrison A.Williams (D-New Jersey) and Chairman of the Senate Sub-committee on Migratory Labor.
Continue reading …Nightline's Yunji de Nies on Thursday offered a laudatory segment on the sex columnist Dan Savage. She has previouisly fawned on Twitter that the writer/activist was “hilarious.” De Nies offered almost no mention of the outrageous statements Savage has made, including referring to Antonin Scalia as a “c–ksucker” and once asserting, “F–k John McCain.” The only hint about the radical nature of Savage came when de Nies explained, “Savage doesn't hide his politics. He famously went after Republican Rick Santorum after the former senator compared homosexuality to bestiality. Savage responded by calling on his fan base to redefine the word Santorum online.” Instead of pressing the syndicated gay columnist about his remarks, she blandly wondered, “Have you had a chance to talk to [Santorum] personally?…Do you have any interest in engaging with him on this?” Amazingly, de Nies didn't even ask Savage about his now infamous 2000 Salon column where he recounted an attempt to “give [then-presidential candidate] Gary Bauer the flu”: Naked, feverish and higher than a kite on codeine aspirin, I called the Bauer campaign and volunteered. My plan? Get close enough to Bauer to give him the flu, which, if I am successful, will lay him flat just before the New Hampshire primary. … I went from doorknob to doorknob. They were filthy, no doubt, but there wasn’t time to find a rag to spit on. My immune system wasn’t all it should be — I was in the grip of the worst flu I had ever had — but I was on a mission. If for some reason I didn’t manage to get a pen from my mouth to Gary’s hands, I wanted to seed his office with germs, get as many of his people sick as I could, and hopefully one of them would infect the candidate.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Michigan voted to extend unemployment initially, but has now become the first state to cut the number of weeks a person can have unemployment benefits from twenty six weeks to twenty starting in 2012. Michigan Lawmakers Pass Controversial Compromise On Unemployment Extension State lawmakers in Michigan passed last-minute legislation to preserve 20 weeks of federal unemployment insurance for the long-term jobless on Wednesday, averting an abrupt cutoff for 35,000 Michiganders in April. But in a deal preserving the benefits, lawmakers sharply reduced aid for future layoff victims. Democrats in MI are calling for Gov. Rick Snyder to veto the new bill: Democrats say the move will simply hurt workers. “This bill does nothing to create jobs or move Michigan forward,” said Whitmer, who along with Hammel and other state Democrats are asking Snyder to veto the legislation and send it back to lawmakers to pass a bill that includes only the needed technical change. “Thirty states have already passed the technical change to their state’s unemployment program without attaching reforms,” Levin said, adding that Michigan would be the first state to shrink unemployment benefits. “This is leading Michigan backwards,” he added. If Snyder signs the bill, Michigan workers would be eligible for only 20 weeks of benefits as opposed to 26, affecting thousands of workers. In 2010, more than 171,000 people in Michigan exhausted 20 weeks of benefits, according to Levin. Levin added that if the bill is signed into law, not only will Michigan workers lose eligibility for six weeks of state-paid benefits, but they would also lose eligibility for 16 weeks of federal benefits if the program is extended into 2012. “Let’s discuss this in a more reasonable way,” Hammel said. “We all want to help business, but let’s not take resources away from workers.” So that’s where we are. Gov. Snyder has already said he’s going to sign the bill, so a veto is out. Then we cut to FOX News’ Stuart Varney, the newest FNC republican, free market shill to get his own show on FOX Business. He’s very happy over these cuts because now as he sees it, austerity is here and it will hurt . (rough transcript) Q: Since the 50′s you could get twenty six weeks, now in Michigan… Varney: That was the standard for fifty years, five full decades, the standard has been you will get six months, twenty six weeks of state funded unemployment benefits and now that standard has been cracked. Michigan is going to twenty weeks and I gotta tell you, Florida is considering moving it down to twelve weeks. That would be a big crack in the established standard. It’s all a response to the fact that you can’t afford it. These state funded .. in that state, all of them have run out of money. — Q: What happens, will it force people to take jobs perhaps that they wouldn’t have taken otherwise? Varney: Well, there’s always that consideration, but let’s look at the big picture. This is austerity. This is in cuts and services and benefits across the board. It’s happening in state after state after state. Austerity is beginning to hit home now. The real story is how will the voters respond to this? We don’t know this, but austerity is here. It bites, it hurts and it’s happening now. Notice how jacked up Varney is about the idea that “AUSTERITY IS HERE!”? There’s not a word in the world that can turn on a conservative economy hack like the word austerity can because that means cuts to the working class. And not just minor ones. Notice that Stuart highlighted that austerity will bite and hurt . There’s a good little Fox News zombie when they need one. Workers supply the carcass that business vultures pick clean to line their pockets with cash and when an opportunity presents itself, they strike. Varney is one of the head scavengers on TV for FOX. Vultures like Varney share this distinctive character trait: Vultures seldom attack healthy animals, but may kill the wounded or sick. Workers are suffering right now because of free market thinkers like Varney, but the masters of business should never have to share the sacrifice. Only the sick and wounded. enlarge Credit: Michigan Labor Market Michigan Unemployment Rate Michigan has over a 10 percent unemployment rate so where are the lowly jobs that they might be forced to take?
Continue reading …Libya govt claims 100 dead in raids as NATO takes on no-fly zone power NATO Takes Charge On Libya-Indiaecho.com NATO takes over Libya no-fly zone LIBYA: NATO will oversee the no-fly zone, coalition strikes the … AFP – NATO countries have concluded a difficult compromise on Thursday that Libya will see them take over from the coalition to impose an air exclusio… Anche tu puoi creare un blog gratis su Libero Blog. LIBYA: NATO to enforce no-fly zone Iwannago.co LIBYA: NATO to enforce no-fly zone. Posted 2 mins ago. NATO said it will enforce a no-fly zone in Libya, but drew the line at assuming control of UN-backed military operations to protect civilians from loyalist forces driving to quash… … Libya: Nato Takes Over Amid More Airstrikes – Sky News | JK … Libya: Nato Takes Over Amid More Airstrikes Sky News Western warplanes continue to bombard targets deep inside Libya – as Nato agreed to take over enforcement of the no-fly zone over the country. To view this content you need Flash and … The 4th Media » YUGOSLAVIA VERSUS LIBYA: NATO's War of Aggression … YUGOSLAVIA VERSUS LIBYA: NATO’s War of Aggression against Yugoslavia. Post Categories: Opinion > Michel Chossudovsky. Share: By Kiyul Chung | 16:00 BeiJing Time,Friday, March 25, 2011. 0 views. Comments(0) … Libya: Nato to control no-fly zone after France gives way to … Climbdown by Sarkozy ends infighting among western allies• Nato secretary-general contradicts western officialsWestern allies and Turkey have secured a. _NSF says: #nsf Gaddafi's forces hit with Tomahawks, air strikes – WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The coalition enforcing a no-fly zone… http://ow.ly/1bVzQl
Continue reading …Director to curate four night season at Cornish festival with Brunel viaduct providing backdrop to outdoor screenings Even legendary Hollywood director Martin Scorsese has never had a set like this to play with – a giant screen by a river under the stars, with a backdrop of trains rumbling across a towering viaduct designed by Isambard Kingdom Brunel. Scorsese, who is curating The Director’s Cut, a unique four-night film season at the Port Eliot Festival in Cornwall this June, clearly agonised over an opening film that would live up to the grandeur of the setting in 4,000 acres of Humphry Repton -designed parkland. Trains and clouds of steam were obviously essential ingredients, and he considered both Shanghai Express (1932), with the luminous Marlene Dietrich and Anna May Wong, or Hitchcock’s thriller The Lady Vanishes (1938). His final choice may surprise devotees of Raging Bull or Gangs of New York: his opener is Murder on the Orient Express (1974), the version directed by one of his heroes, Sidney Lumet, starring Albert Finney as Agatha Christie’s cranky Belgian detective, Hercule Poirot, which he regards as a classic. He has paired it with Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (1959), which ends with one of the deathless cinema metaphors when Cary Grant, having battled the baddies on the face of Mount Rushmore, pulls his new wife to him on a train, and the scene cuts to the train itself speeding into a tunnel. It was a considerable coup for one of the summer’s most eclectic festivals to persuade Scorsese to take a break from editing his first 3D film, The Invention of Hugo Cabret, filmed at Shepperton and starring Jude Law and Sir Ben Kingsley, to programme four themed double bills. Port Eliot, at St Germans, began as a small books event in 2003 and now includes music, food, fashion, art, a flower show and comedy. This year will also include John Cooper Clarke presenting a masterclass on writing limericks. All Scorsese’s film choices are vintage. He is a passionate film historian and has worked with the British Film Institute (BFI) to secure the prints for his season. Heather Stewart, creative director of the BFI, said his season matches its mission of getting archive film out to new and broad audiences. She said: “The interaction of these forms and the mix in such an inspiring setting will be a great experience for the festivalgoers and artists alike.” On successive nights Scorsese has chosen films which appear on many lists of the greatest of all time, including Luchino Visconti’s The Leopard (1963), matched with Jean Renoir’s The River (1951) for his literary adaptations night. Michael Powell’s ravishing ballet movie, The Red Shoes (1948), starring the glorious Moira Shearer, which is apparently his favourite film, is matched with All About Eve (1950) for his musical theme. He has not chosen any of his own films, but that gap will be filled by discussions of his work chaired by the film writer Tom Shone. “Getting Scorsese to do something for this tiny corner of Cornwall is truly fantastic,” Cathy St Germans, co-founder of the festival, said. “We did it the way we got Sarah Waters to come here and many others – we wrote him a nice proper letter, and he said yes.” Scorsese has yet to visit the beautiful estate and the house which claims to be the oldest continuously inhabited in the country, the home for centuries of the St Germans family, but will be pleased to discover he can come by train. When a 19th century earl allowed the railway to cross his lands, the payback was one of the prettiest railway stations in the country, right at his gate, and unlike many quaint vintage stations, still in daily use. “He hasn’t said he’s not coming, so we very much hope he will – if he does we know he will just fall in love with the place as everyone does.” The contact with Scorsese came through his long-term colleague, the British costume designer Sandy Powell, who was nominated for an Oscar for her astounding costumes for Gangs of New York, and won one for The Aviator. She came first to the festival as a visitor, and returned last year as a performer, presenting a show-and-tell session which included her Oscar statuette – at the special request of Lord St Germans. The festival organisers are working hard to create an environment which lives up to Scorsese’s vision: the Paradiso will have a cocktail bar in an Airstream campervan, some seats in cardboard Cadillacs designed by the Ballet Rambert designer Michael Howells, and will also be serving hot chocolate and providing blankets and umbrellas just in case. “The idea of a cinema by the river came last year when I was lying on the grass one night at last year’s festival. It felt like the first time I’d lain down in days – and I thought what I’d really like now is to watch a lovely movie, right here, without having to move,” Cathy St Germans said. The Director’s Cut: Michael Scorsese’s Open Air Film Festival Trains Murder on the Orient Express/North by Northwest Books The Leopard/The River Noir The Narrow Margin/Human Desire Musicals The Red Shoes/All About Eve Martin Scorsese Film industry Sidney Lumet Festivals Maev Kennedy guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Troops reportedly open fire on anti-regime demonstrators as protests spread from Syria’s south to Damascus and Aleppo Demonstrations in the Syrian capital, Damascus, and elsewhere were met with force as security forces struggled to contain unrest that had begun in the southern city of Deraa a week ago. Thousands once again joined funeral processions in Deraa on Friday, chanting: “Deraa people are hungry, we want freedom.” Hundreds took to the streets in the cities of Homs, Hama, Tel and Latakia and in towns surrounding Deraa, with smaller protests in the major cities of Damascus and Aleppo, which are more firmly under the watch of security forces. Troops reportedly opened fire in some cases. Protests in the capital are rare and not tolerated by the Ba’athist regime. A witness told the Guardian that efforts at protests in Damascus were broken up by plain-clothed agents using batons. By nightfall, a counter-demonstration had been mounted near the historic Umayyad mosque in the heart of the capital. Brief clashes were reported between anti-regime demonstrators and loyalists. A large rally then began in support of President Bashar al-Assad. Hundreds drove around the capital beeping horns and waving flags, whilst posters of the president were put up in the city. The violence in Syria came after the government had pledged on Thursday to look into reforms. But activists using the Syrian Revolution Facebook page had called for a day of solidarity with Deraa, where according to unofficial reports at least 44 have been killed in the past week. In the past, many young Syrians had been willing to overlook corruption, a lack of freedom and the slow pace of reforms in return for what they have seen as dignified leadership brought about by Assad’s anti-Western foreign policy. He has also had a youthful appeal. Both appear to now be wearing thin. “Regimes become really weak when their image turns to brutality. The killings in Deraa have done that,” said Ziad Malki, an activist living in exile in Switzerland. “The Syrian people want more now.” Others agreed that a turning point had been reached. “Syrians [normally] never come out to protests. This shows how the killings, the worthless reforms announced yesterday and the government propaganda is insulting and is only making us angrier,” said a 32-year-old man. The protests and revolts across the Arab world continued elsewhere in Jordan, Bahrain and Yemen. In Amman, one person was killed and more than 100 wounded when pro-government loyalists attacked a weekly pro-reform vigil in the heart of the Jordanian capital. The clashes were broken up by riot police. The violence was the first of its kind in Jordan in more than two months of protests which have seen the king sack his cabinet and pledge reforms. Islamic Action Front leader Hamza Mansour, whose party leads Jordan’s nascent opposition, said one of its members, Khairi Jamil Saeed, 26, was killed by being beaten by police. “This is an atrocious crime and we blame it on prime minister Marouf al-Bakhit and his cabinet,” Mansour told the Associated Press. “The prime minister and the cabinet must resign.” In Yemen, President Ali Abdullah Saleh said that he was willing to relinquish power but not unconditionally. “We are prepared to give up power but only to good, capable hands, not to malicious forces who conspire against the homeland,” said Saleh after calling on young people leading protests against him to establish a political party and deliver a roadmap for Yemen’s future. Striking a defiant pose, Saleh attacked those he claims are “conspiring against him”, calling them Houthis – an armed clan demanding autonomy in north Yemen – and drug dealers. A few miles away, anti-government protesters staged their biggest pro-democracy rally since unrest broke out five months ago, in what they called the Friday of Departure. Tens of thousands knelt in neat rows for a mass prayer ceremony as a weeping imam demanded: “Why do you kill us Ali? Why?” A week ago, 53 protesters were killed at the spot by plain-clothed government loyalists firing from the roofs of nearby houses. In the Bahrain capital, Manama, riot police fired teargas at demonstrators who defied a ban on public gatherings and staged a rally in the Shia suburb of Duraz. At least 20 people have been killed in a two-month uprising led by a disaffected Shia majority against the Gulf island’s Sunni rulers. Katherine Marsh is a pseudonym for a journalist living in Damascus Syria Yemen Middle East Protest Tom Finn Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Question Time host warns that people could ‘come to regret’ the advent of the electoral TV debates They were greeted as the most important innovation in television coverage of a general election for a generation. But David Dimbleby, the host of BBC1′s flagship political programme Question Time, has questioned whether the hugely popular TV party leader debates were a good thing after all. Dimbleby, who hosted the BBC’s edition of the live head-to-heads between Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg last year, used an awards ceremony on Friday to warn that people could “come to regret” the advent of the TV debates, which look set to become a permanent fixture of the UK political landscape. “The debates certainly were an innovation. They will change the way electoral campaigns are conducted, not necessarily entirely for the better,” said Dimbleby in a video message to the Broadcasting Press Guild awards in central London , where the party leader debates won the innovation prize. “In one way they are odd because we don’t have a presidential system in Britain. We have a parliamentary system. We don’t elect prime ministers, we elect parliaments and MPs; we have after all got a coalition now,” he added. “And looking back on it we introduced the debates as the three men who want to be prime minister. What are we going to do at the next election? Maybe say the two men who want to be prime minister and the one man who wants to be deputy prime minister.” Dimbleby said he also had “doubts on another score”. “I would hate it if these debates stop people taking part in the kind of thing we do on Question Time. During the campaign the party leaders come in, face the voters and make their case and face fierce criticism from them,” he added. “So as an innovation we have to be a bit cautious. It was fun to do – I was lucky to be third on, actually all I had to do was try and remember the next person to speak which wasn’t always that easy. “But that said it’s a big innovation, a big change, an exciting event and I am really grateful for this prize. I just hope it’s not one of those things that you could come to regret what you wish for.” But his concerns were batted away by Sky News’s political editor Adam Boulton. “All the research shows they engage people and engage young people in the political process,” said Boulton after the awards at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. “I don’t think they distort the political process and I hope they are going to happen again,” he added. “Obviously everyone has their own views. I think we would all like to experiment and innovate with the formats and do slightly different things. All that depends on having the confidence of the parties to do it.” Boulton said Dimbleby had “covered the political process for god knows how long, he obviously has some thoughts on the impact [of the debates] on the political process… It’s an interesting question given his age and all that whether he is going to be around for the next election anyway.” Dimbleby’s views did not appear to be shared either by the BBC’s head of political programmes and analysis, Sue Inglish, who commented at the end of the Question Time presenter’s recorded message: “That’s very David, is it not?” Inglish said it had been a “great honour” to be involved in organising the debates, which she said had been watched by nearly 22 million people, describing the combined audience as “quite extraordinary”. The first ever UK televised leaders’ debate, broadcast on ITV1 on 15 April last year, was watched by an average audience of 9.4 million viewers, a 37% share of the audience beating both Coronation Street and EastEnders . The second, broadcast across Sky News, the BBC News channel and Sky 3, had a combined audience of 4.1 million on 22 April , while the third – broadcast on BBC1 and hosted by Dimbleby – drew 8.4 million viewers . The debates were only made possible following prolonged negotiations between broadcasters and political parties which resulted in a 76-point pact on the format they would take place . Dimbleby has also recently expressed concern at changes to BBC1′s Question Time , which will move from London to a new base in Glasgow. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook David Dimbleby Television industry John Plunkett guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …A brief guide to key facts everyone should know about Syria 1. Greater Syria: Syria was the name once applied to most of the territory on the eastern side of the Mediterranean Sea and in the seventh century it became the seat of the Umayyad caliphate . The smaller modern state of Syria – adjoining Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon – began as a French mandate when the Ottoman empire was broken up after the first world war. It became independent in 1946. Its capital, Damascus, is one of the world’s oldest continuously inhabited cities. 2. Order of the Ba’ath: The Ba’ath party , which has dominated Syrian politics since seizing power in 1963, was founded in 1947 as a pan-Arab nationalist and socialist “renaissance” movement. Its slogan is “unity, freedom, socialism”. Under President Hafez al-Assad (1971–2000), the Ba’athists consolidated central government and brought a measure of stability to the country – though at a high cost in terms of repression. 3. President Bashar: Bashar al-Assad was in London, pursuing a career in ophthalmology when his elder brother, Basil – heir apparent to the presidency – died in a car crash in 1994. Bashar was recalled to be groomed for power. When his father died in 2000, Bashar was made head of the army and leader of the Ba’ath party. But at 34, he was too young to become president under the Syrian constitution. The age qualification was hastily revised and he was “elected” president in a referendum. His wife, Asma Akhras , was born in Britain to Syrian parents. She formerly worked as an investment banker at JP Morgan. 4. The occupied Golan: The Golan Heights, a mountainous and strategically import area bordering the Sea of Galilee, was captured by Israel during the 1967 war. Part of it was handed back after the 1973 war, but the return of the remaining territory has been one of the Syrian regime’s principal goals ever since. There is a spot on the ceasefire line known as Shouting Valley where Syrians use megaphones to hail their relatives on the other side. 5. The Hama massacre: In 1982 Syrian forces launched a brutal assault on the city of Hama to quell an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood, killing thousands. Memories of the event, which is rarely mentioned publicly in Syria, continue to cast a long shadow over political opposition to the regime. 6. Elegant lines: Syria has some of the world’s most beautiful railway stations. 7. Syria and Lebanon: Lebanon was separated from Syria under the French mandate, since it was largely a Christian enclave, and became officially independent in 1943. From Damascus, Lebanon still tends to be viewed as part of Syria’s traditional sphere of influence. Syria used its military to stabilise Lebanon after the 1975-91 civil war but also meddled extensively in Lebanese politics. Protests and diplomatic pressure after the assassination of former prime minister Rafik Hariri in 2005 forced Syria (which was widely blamed for the attack) to withdraw its troops. However, Syrian influence continues, with Lebanese politics divided into the pro-Syrian “March 8″ camp and the “March 14″ camp backed by Saudi Arabia and the US. 8. Hooray for the president: During public speeches in Syria, it is customary to applaud each time the name of President Assad is mentioned. 9. Religion and the Alawites: The Alawites are a secretive religious sect usually regarded as an offshoot of Shia Islam. In Syria they are a tiny minority but, through the president’s family and others in senior positions, they are dominant within the regime. About 74% of Syria’s inhabitants are Sunni Muslims; Shia Muslims (including the Alawites and Ismailis) account for 13%, various Christian groups 10%, and Druze 3%. Jewish communities have existed in Syria for centuries but today their number is extremely small – probably no more than a few dozen people. 10. Crony capitalism: Despite its socialist origins, the Syrian regime is plagued by corruption and crony capitalism – especially involving relatives of the president. A particular target of protesters is Rami Makhlouf, Assad’s cousin, who was sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2008 on the grounds that he “improperly benefits from and aids the public corruption of Syrian regime officials”. 11. Kurdish aspirations: Syria has a marginalised Kurdish minority who are thought to number about 1.75 million – roughly 10% of the total population – and the regime has made persistent efforts over the years to Arabise them. Many of the Kurds, meanwhile, aspire to have their own independent state including other Kurds from Turkey, Iraq and Iran. Kurdish discontent flares up from time to time, though the regime generally denies that Syria has problems relating to ethnicity. 12. Road to Damascus: It was on the road to Damascus , according to the Bible, that St Paul was dazzled by a heavenly light and converted to Christianity. He later escaped arrest in the city by being lowered from a window in a basket . 13. Cold steel: Swords made from Damascus steel have been much prized over the centuries. According to written sources , blades were prepared by heating and then cooling them rapidly – sometimes by plunging them into the urine of red-headed boys or into the body of a muscular slave. 14. Shia pilgrims: Syria is a popular destination for Shia pilgrims from Iran. In Damascus, many visit the shrine of Sayidda Zeinab (granddaughter of the prophet Muhammad and daughter of Ali, the fourth caliph). Historical and religious ties are part of the background to Syria’s current relationship with Iran, though both countries see themselves as stalwart opponents of American and Israeli influence in the region. 15. Syria and Hezbollah: Syria (along with Iran) supports the armed Lebanese Shia movement, Hezbollah . Besides providing a means to wield influence in Lebanon, this gives Syria an important bargaining chip in any future negotiations with Israel. 16. Political suicide: The disgraced former prime minister Mahmoud Zuabi allegedly shot himself in 2000 when police arrived to arrest him on corruption charges. Five years later, the interior minister Ghazi Kanaan also apparently shot himself in mysterious circumstances. 17. Silken threads: Damascus was once a major centre for weaving and trading in textiles. Damask – using an ancient technique for weaving patterns into cloth – derives its name from the city. 18. Crusader territory: Parts of Syria were conquered by the Crusaders. The 11th century Crusader fortress Krak des Chevaliers – still remarkably well preserved – is now a major tourist attraction. 19. The Argentinian connection: About 1.3m Argentinians are of Syrian or Lebanese origin, many of them having settled there during the 19th century. The parents of former Argentinian president Carlos Menem came from the Syrian village of Yabrud. 20. Assault in Deraa: Deraa, the centre of the 2011 uprising, is where TE Lawrence (“Lawrence of Arabia”) was captured during the first world war while reconnoitring in disguise and, according to his account, was severely beaten and sexually abused by the Turkish governor. The incident affected Lawrence deeply and is said to have awakened his masochistic tendencies which later resulted in him paying military colleagues to beat him. Syria Middle East Brian Whitaker guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …National Association of Head Teachers says academies agenda means education secretary is ignoring bigger picture Headteachers have accused the education secretary of being driven by an ideological agenda after it emerged that almost half the schools he has visited since taking power are – or have applied to become – academies. A list obtained from the Department for Education reveals that 10 of the 27 schools Michael Gove has visited since he became education secretary are academies. A further two have had government approval to become academies and three are considering applying to switch status. Across the country, just 3% of primary and secondaries – 638 schools – are, or have applied to become, academies. Gove has said he wants academy status – when schools opt out of local authority control – to be “the norm” because this will drive up standards. Gove also appears to have concentrated his visits on schools that are already performing well. Thirteen of the 27 schools and two colleges that Gove has been to were rated outstanding at their last full inspection. This, again, does not represent the true picture of what is happening across the country. Ofsted, the schools inspectorate, says just 13% of schools and 6% of colleges are deemed outstanding. None of the visits were to the 8% of schools and 4% of colleges that inspectors have said are inadequate. Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said Gove should be reminded that he is education secretary “for all schools, not just those who are following the government’s agenda. Really great leaders go and seek the views of people who will challenge and disagree with them,” he said. “It’s really important that Gove tests out his ideas in schools that aren’t going to just say what he wants to hear. This list of schools is trended in favour of academies and the most confident schools, who have been rated outstanding.” In addition, more than half the visits – 16 out of 29 – were to schools and colleges in London. Headteachers have been at pains to remind ministers that London has a different set of educational problems from other parts of the country and should not be viewed as representative of England. None of the schools Gove has visited select on academic ability, but several are faith schools. Most of the secondary schools he has visited are in poor neighbourhoods. Some 11 of the 17 secondaries have a higher than average proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals, an important indicator of deprivation. Headteachers said the number of visits to schools was “reasonable” and they were happy Gove’s office had chosen schools and colleges in poor neighbourhoods. But they warned that the education secretary appeared to be driven by an ideological agenda rather than by knowledge of what goes on in schools and colleges. Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said Gove should be visiting more schools outside London because the capital had a “specific educational context that isn’t repeated elsewhere”. “Certainly a lot of the schools on this list support government policy,” he said. Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said Gove should have visited more schools that were against becoming academies. “He is embarking on the biggest dismantling of state education we have ever known – he needs to hear why many schools want to remain attached to their local authority, rather than go it alone.” One headteacher, who did not want to be named and had had a visit from Gove in the last few months, said Gove “does not have the fullest understanding of the state educational landscape”. “This is possibly due to the types of experiences he has encountered in his education.” All the headteachers the Guardian spoke to whose schools had been visited by Gove said he had been passionate about education and had been generous with his time. Patricia Sowter, headteacher of Cuckoo Hall, a primary academy in north London, said the visit had given her staff and pupils a “tremendous morale boost in an area of London that is often ignored”. All the visits were as secretary of state and do not include those made as a local MP. Michael Gove Academies Schools Faith schools Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …