Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 483)
Apple is world’s most valuable brand

Apple catapults to the summit of top 100 global brands with an 84% increase in its estimated value to $153bn (£93bn) The launch of the iPad helped Apple topple rival technology company Google in 2010 to become the world’s most powerful brand, according to a survey. WPP-owned research company Millward Brown puts Apple at number one in its annual top 100 global brand power list, Brandz, up from third place in 2009, with an 84% increase in its estimated value to $153bn (£93bn). Apple ended Google’s four year run at the top of the global brand power list, in a year when social media darling Facebook also made its debut in the top 100. However, the fallout of the Deepwater Horizon disaster dogged BP, which was one of the biggest fallers, down 30 places to 64th with a 27% drop in its brand value to $12bn. “It is really the iPad that has driven [Apple's growing brand value], although the iPhone has continued to do magnificently too, and the development of apps,” said Peter Walshe, global director of the Brandz report. Millward Brown’s report, which balances brand power with financial performance, shrugged off the potential impact of Apple chief executive Steve Jobs’ medical leave, instead focusing on the seemingly endless production line of must-have products Apple churns out. Walshe added that on measures examined within the report such as “desirability”, Apple scores in the top 10 in the world and on a “buzz” scale – taking in mentions on blogs, message boards and tweets – it comes fourth behind Google, Facebook and Microsoft. Facebook made it onto the Millward Brown list for the first time – this is the sixth year the report has been published – having been held back in previous years by poor evidence of financial clout. The social networking service, which has attracted a valuation of $70bn and is expected to float next year, was ranked 35th with a 246% increase year-on-year in its estimated brand value from $5.5bn to $19bn. “Facebook had a staggering year,” said Walshe. “Time will tell if the financial part of the estimate is stable or not.” The most valuable brand in the UK was once again telecoms company Vodafone, which ranks 12th on the global list, with a value almost flat year-on-year at $43bn. Toyota, which was hammered in the 2009 Brandz report, with its brand value plummeting 28% after the mass recall of faulty cars, bounced back to be the most valuable car marque, up 11% to $24bn in 27th place. Amazon also moved up a place to 14th to pass Walmart, down two spots to 15th, and become the highest ranked retailer on the list. Amazon increased by 37% in brand value last year to $37bn. Chinese search engine Baidu rocketed 46 places to 29th with a 141% increase in brand value to $22bn. Top fallers included Nokia, which has embarked on a restructuring programme after failing to keep step with rivals Apple and Google, down 38 places to 81st with a brand value of $10.7bn, down 28% year-on-year. Nintendo dropped 47 places to 79th with a 37% fall in brand value to $11bn. TOP 10 Most Valuable Global Brands 1. Apple $153bn 2. Google $111bn 3. IBM $100bn 4. McDonald’s $81bn 5. Microsoft $78bn 6. Coca Cola $73bn 7. AT&T $70bn 8. Marlboro $67bn 9. China Mobile $57bn 10. GE $50bn Apple Nokia Facebook BP Google Toyota Automotive industry Mobile phones Mark Sweney guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Key changes to NHS plans agreed

Deputy PM tells Andrew Marr show that GPs should not be forced to sign up to new commissioning consortiums David Cameron and Nick Clegg have agreed changes to the government’s NHS reforms, allowing the deputy prime minister to launch a ferocious attack on Sunday on the original plans as a “disruptive revolution”. As the Royal College of GPs calls for a radical overhaul of plans to hand 60% of the NHS budget to new GP-led consortiums, Tory sources indicated that the Cameron-Clegg negotiations have left Andrew Lansley an isolated figure in the government’s “listening exercise”. Lansley, the embattled health secretary, who is still resisting some of their demands, has been left briefing colleagues that Clegg has embarked on a U-turn after declaring in January that “funnily enough” the NHS reforms were in the Liberal Democrats’ general election manifesto. Clegg gave a taste of the areas of agreement with Cameron on Sunday when he told The Andrew Marr Show that GPs should not be forced to sign up to the new commissioning consortiums and that a 2013 deadline for the changes should be relaxed. The deputy prime minister said: “A lot of people have said to me – and I basically think they’re right – they’re saying you’re going too fast, you’re trying to meet artificial deadlines, you’re forcing GPs to take on commissioning roles when they might not want to or aren’t able to. I basically think they’re right. “I think what we should now do is – which is a change – is an evolutionary approach that only happens […] where people are willing and able to take on these new changes. If not, we shouldn’t be forcing the pace according to artificial deadlines in a calendar.” In a sign of his confidence that real changes will be introduced, Clegg said the health and social care bill, which he praised on the same programme in January as an example of the fusion of Tory-Lib Dem thinking, was deeply flawed. “As far as government legislation is concerned, no bill is better than a bad one, and I want to get this right,” he said. “Getting these changes right, protecting the NHS rather than undermining it, is now my number one priority. “I’m not going to ask Liberal Democrat MPs and Liberal Democrat peers to proceed with legislation on something as precious and cherished, particularly for Liberal Democrats, as the NHS unless I personally am satisfied that what these changes do is an evolutionary change in the NHS, not a disruptive revolution.” The Liberal Democrats hailed the deputy prime minister’s tough language as a sign of a new assertive relationship with the Tories after the drubbing in the elections last week. Clegg himself heralded this new approach when he said the Lib Dems would act as a “moderating influence” on the Tories. He added: “Where we are dealing with new things – the NHS is a prominent example – we need to bring our particular influence to bear in a very clear manner.” Lord Oakeshott , a close ally of the business secretary, Vince Cable, went even further. He said: “Andrew Lansley is like a mad professor sitting in a secret laboratory mixing up his own magic potion. It has not been through Nice [the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence]. “We will have to give it a test to see if it is fit to be let loose on the patient.” But senior Tories, who were irritated with the tone of Clegg’s language, said that most of the policy changes highlighted by the Lib Dem leader had been agreed with Cameron. In a sign that Cameron and Clegg, rather than Lansley, are driving the negotiations, one source said the health secretary has given ground in opening up the GP-led consortiums, though he is still holding out on the role for consultants. “Andrew Lansley is there on all areas apart from two points,” the source said. “So we have to work out what substantive areas he will be agreeing.” Lansley is indicating to colleagues that he may still be prepared for a fight. He is pointing out that Clegg fully endorsed the health and social care bill in an appearance on the Andrew Marr Show on 23 January shortly before every Lib Dem MP present at Westminster, except John Pugh, endorsed the bill at its second reading in the Commons. Asked by Marr whether the reforms were in the manifesto, Clegg said: “Actually funnily enough it was. Indeed it was…We certainly said we were going to get rid of Primary Care Trusts. We said we were going to get rid of strategic health authorities.”The prospect of a showdown between Lansley and Downing Street came as GP leaders warned that the reforms would wreck the NHS. In a strongly-worded submission, the Royal College of GPs highlights key “risks” inherent in the bill, which seeks to force healthcare providers to compete. It warns that: • Intensifying competition in the NHS will lead to the service breaking up, drive up costs, damage patient are and less integration of services. • Family doctors and hospitals could start charging patients for certain services as the bill hands the health secretary’s longstanding power to impose fees to the planned new groupings or consortiums of GPs. • The NHS’s mission since its creation in 1948 to provide healthcare to everyone, irrespective of need or ability to pay, could disappear as the Bill removes the health secretary’s historic duty of ensuring the provision of a comprehensive national health service. • The NHS should be “the preferred provider” of NHS services and deeply controversial plans to let “any willing provider” treat patients – including private firms – should be dropped. NHS Health Nick Clegg David Cameron Andrew Lansley Health policy Public services policy GPs Doctors Liberal Democrats Conservatives Liberal-Conservative coalition Nicholas Watt Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Court to define miscarriage of justice

Millions of pounds in compensation for people wrongfully convicted hinges on decision by nine judges Britain’s most senior judges will decide this week whether hundreds of people whose wrongful convictions have been quashed by the court of appeal are truly innocent. In a landmark ruling, the supreme court will define the meaning of a miscarriage of justice and decide when individuals are entitled to official compensation. Millions of pounds in compensation are at stake in a case triggered by government refusal over the last five years to pay financial redress to victims of miscarriages of justice, many of whom have spent years in prison for crimes they did not commit. Andrew Adams, 41, who spent 14 years in jail after being wrongly convicted of murder, is the lead appellant in the case, which lawyers say is the most important constitutional decision to be made by the supreme court to date. His murder conviction was quashed in January 2007 on the grounds that his defence team did not use crucial evidence available to it. A year later he was refused compensation by the Home Office, a decision he has been fighting ever since. Other appellants are Barry George, who was refused official compensation after being acquitted at a retrial of the murder of the BBC presenter Jill Dando, and two men whose convictions for membership of the IRA and murder at the Diplock courts in Northern Ireland have been quashed. The ruling, on Wednesday, will have reverberations throughout the legal world and will determine whether compensation should be paid in several high-profile miscarriage of justice cases, including that of Sîon Jenkins, whose conviction for killing his foster daughter, Billie-Jo Jenkins, was overturned after juries failed to reach verdicts in two retrials. Lawyers for Adams told all nine supreme court judges that it was unlawful of the justice secretary to refuse in January 2008 to award Adams statutory compensation as a victim of a miscarriage of justice. Daniel Machover, who represents Adams, said: “We hope that the ruling will outline definitively what a miscarriage of justice is. It is a fact that a person is entitled to a presumption of innocence if they have their conviction overturned on the basis of a new or newly discovered fact. “The question is whether that presumption of innocence is enough to say, this is therefore a miscarriage of justice and everyone who has suffered a miscarriage of justice is entitled to compensation. That is what we are arguing: that the presumption of innocence equals the right to compensation.” The case focuses on the Gogovernment’s refusal to pay compensation to individuals who have applied since 2006, when changes were made to the system. Lawyers have told the supreme court that the government is wrongly adopting a narrow definition of miscarriage of justice which requires claimants to prove clear innocence in order to receive compensation. Schedules suggest up to 200 individuals could be affected. On average, around 40 individuals who have had convictions quashed or been acquitted at retrials have applied for official compensation each year since 2006. In the past year, only one out of 37 who applied was awarded the money. Nick Baird, for Barry George, said: “This will be the most important constitutional decision handed down by the supreme court. What the Ministry of Justice says is that for there to be a miscarriage of justice the person convicted and acquitted needs subsequent to that to prove their innocence in order to be entitled to compensation. “We say, how do you do that? How do you prove a negative? It is contrary to everything that I have learnt is embodied in the criminal justice system.” George spent eight years in prison after being wrongfully convicted of Dando’s murder in April 1999. He won his second appeal and the court ordered a retrial, at which he was acquitted. The Ministry of Justice has continued to argue that a miscarriage of justice occurs only where someone is eventually found to be “clearly innocent”. “This is an ongoing legal matter,” an MoJ spokeswoman said. “We will not be making any comment until the judgment is given.” UK supreme court UK criminal justice Jill Dando murder Crime Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
How do I choose my Twitter photo?

But that shouldn’t stop us discussing Kate’s wardrobe (in 140 characters or less) I have recently been lured in by the siren call of Twitter. How do I choose my photo for it? And is it acceptable to change my photo occasionally? Brian, London “The siren call”, you say, Brian? To those of us who have, amazingly, managed to resist the temptation to share our every passing thought about what’s happening on the telly with thousands of “followers”, and be bombarded by the thoughts of thousands of others doing the same, it is indeed a siren call, albeit not a Greek temptress siren but a screeching ambulance one that makes me want to put my hands over my ears and run in the opposite direction. Well, de gustibus non est disputandum , as I never say (because my taste is always right and everyone who disagrees is wrong): if you’re determined to be a twit, then I cannot stop you. But you raise an interesting point with the photo and you’re quite right that it is a tricky decision, mainly because no one seems certain what Twitter is for: is it a means of spreading news? Encouraging political revolution? Telling the world what you think about the death of Osama bin Laden? Ascertaining what Paris Hilton thinks about the death of Osama bin Laden? Self-promotion? One-liners about Kate Middleton’s wedding dress? Starting feuds with other people in your industry purely for procrastination purposes? Yes, yes, and five more times, yes. But the myriad of purposes requires not just a careful calibration of tones, but a very special photo. After all, a photo that suits, say, a disquisition on the naffness of Eurovision does not, perhaps, work so well when one is proclaiming the generation-changing nature of Bin Laden’s death (in 140 characters or less.) And no, you cannot hide behind what I guess is called the Twitter egg: that merely looks like you can’t be bothered and don’t care about the needs, expectations and entertainment of your followers. So somehow, you must find the perfect photo that suits all moods and proclamations. As if that wasn’t pressure enough, you’d better make sure that when you do choose a picture that it is the perfect one because you cannot change it. A change of photo suggests vanity and a deliberate attempt to change one’s image that is somehow forgivable on Facebook but not on Twitter. Twitter, you see, is supposed to be above such things, as you’d expect of a medium used to start revolutions (and express opinions on Kate Middleton’s dress). So you need to find the perfect photo, one that expresses wit, solemnity, intelligence, thunderous anger and awe-inspiring insider knowledge; a mash-up, if you will, of Christopher Hitchens, Paul Krugman, Stephen Colbert, David Remnick and Dorothy Parker, but also one that makes you look, you know, young and hot. And if you’re finding this stressful, wait until you realise that your devastatingly witty observation about David Cameron’s face hasn’t been retweeted once. Really, isn’t life hard enough? So we’ve all seen the wedding dress. Do we still have to care about how Kate Middleton dresses? Sarah, by email Oh my stars, yes. Now more than ever! But as with the Twitter, no one quite seems to know why because no one knows what the royal family is for (and, one might add, were one feeling particularly sarcastic, perhaps this in turn suggests that the confusion comes from the fact that the royal family and Twitter alike are not for anything at all. But let’s not start the week on the grumpy note we know it will end on). Even before Cinderella married Prince Charming, one writer hilariously came over all Dowager Countess of Grantham, despite writing for the most downmarket tabloid ever produced and she huffed and puffed like the big bad wolf over Kate’s shocking gumption in buying clothes from the – gasp – high street! “Staggeringly normal, mind-bogglingly cheap and disappointingly pedestrian,” sniffed the scribe, which is funny because that middle term is just what some of us think of the jibes thrown by this tabloid at la Middleton. And yet, insanely, Kate, somehow failed to follow this writer’s advice and continued to wear high-street clothes even after the wedding, prompting one American fashion blog to headline the photo, “Kate Middleton Steps Out in an $89 Polyester Zara Dress the Day After the Wedding.” The story itself was (sort of) positive, the superfluous reference to polyester was not. And so, in order to help the duchess, I have the perfect outfit that she should wear to satisfy one and all of her subjects: a Disney princess costume, which is just how princesses are supposed to dress. They appear to be only £20, true, but only Kate gets to have all of her dreams come true. Fashion Kate Middleton Twitter Internet Blogging Hadley Freeman guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
The pain of playing Shylock

What’s it like to play Shakespeare’s most controversial character? As a new RSC production opens, Patrick Stewart, Antony Sher and other former Shylocks reveal all Patrick Stewart Bristol Old Vic, 1963; Royal Shakespeare Company, 1978-9; stars in new RSC production Each time I come to Shylock , I come with a different perspective. The last time I played him, it was as a very brutal and angry man, a man not overly sensitive to the world around him, to his daughter, to Antonio. This time, I have found an individual who is more open and sensitive, still vengeful and angry but with seemingly more

Continue reading …
Nato units left 61 migrants to die of hunger and thirst

Exclusive: Boat trying to reach Lampedusa was left to drift in Mediterranean for 16 days, despite alarm being raised Dozens of African migrants were left to die in the Mediterranean after a number of European and Nato military units apparently ignored their cries for help, the Guardian has learned. A boat carrying 72 passengers, including several women, young children and political refugees, ran into trouble in late March after leaving Tripoli for the Italian island of Lampedusa. Despite alarms being raised with the Italian coastguard and the boat making contact with a military helicopter and a Nato warship, no rescue effort was attempted. All but 11 of those on board died from thirst and hunger after their vessel was left to drift in open waters for 16 days. “Every morning we would wake up and find more bodies, which we would leave for 24 hours and then throw overboard,” said Abu Kurke, one of only nine survivors. “By the final days, we didn’t know ourselves … everyone was either praying, or dying.” International maritime law compels all vessels, including military units, to answer distress calls from nearby boats and to offer help where possible. Refugee rights campaigners have demanded an investigation into the deaths, while the UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency, has called for stricter co-operation among commercial and military vessels in the Mediterranean in an effort to save human lives. “The Mediterranean cannot become the wild west,” said spokeswoman Laura Boldrini. “Those who do not rescue people at sea cannot remain unpunished.” Her words were echoed by Father Moses Zerai, an Eritrean priest in Rome who runs the refugee rights organisation Habeshia, and who was one of the last people to be in communication with the migrant boat before its satellite phone ran out of battery. “There was an abdication of responsibility which led to the deaths of over 60 people, including children,” he claimed. “That constitutes a crime, and that crime cannot go unpunished just because the victims were African migrants and not tourists on a cruise liner.” This year’s political turmoil and military conflict in north Africa have fuelled a sharp rise in the number of people attempting to reach Europe by sea, with up to 30,000 migrants believed to have made the journey across the Mediterranean over the past four months. Large numbers have died en route; last month more than 800 migrants of different nationalities who left on boats from Libya never made it to European shores and are presumed dead. Underlining the dangers, on SundaySunday more than 400 migrants were involved in a dramatic rescue when their boat hit rocks on Lampedusa. The pope, meanwhile, in an address to more than 300,000 worshippers, called on Italians to welcome immigrants fleeing to their shores. The Guardian’s investigation into the case of the boat of 72 migrants which set sail from Tripoli on 25 March established that it carried 47 Ethiopians, seven Nigerians, seven Eritreans, six Ghanaians and five Sudanese migrants. Twenty were women and two were small children, one of whom was just one year old. The boat’s Ghanaian captain was aiming for the Italian island of Lampedusa, 180 miles north-west of the Libyan capital, but after 18 hours at sea the small vessel began running into trouble and losing fuel. Using witness testimony from survivors and other individuals who were in contact with the passengers during its doomed voyage, the Guardian has pieced together what happened next. The account paints a harrowing picture of a group of desperate migrants condemned to death by a combination of bad luck, bureaucracy and the apparent indifference of European military forces who had the opportunity to attempt a rescue. The migrants used the boat’s satellite phone to call Zerai in Rome, who in turn contacted the Italian coastguard. The boat’s location was narrowed down to about 60 miles off Tripoli, and coastguard officials assured Zerai that the alarm had been raised and all relevant authorities had been alerted to the situation. Soon a military helicopter marked with the word “army” appeared above the boat. The pilots, who were wearing military uniforms, lowered bottles of water and packets of biscuits and gestured to passengers that they should hold their position until a rescue boat came to help. The helicopter flew off, but no rescue boat arrived. No country has yet admitted sending the helicopter that made contact with the migrants. A spokesman for the Italian coastguard said: “We advised Malta that the vessel was heading towards their search and rescue zone, and we issued an alert telling vessels to look out for the boat, obliging them to attempt a rescue.” The Maltese authorities denied they had had any involvement with the boat. After several hours of waiting, it became apparent to those on board that help was not on the way. The vessel had only 20 litres of fuel left, but the captain told passengers that Lampedusa was close enough for him to make it there unaided. It was a fatal mistake. By 27 March, the boat had lost its way, run out of fuel and was drifting with the currents. “We’d finished the oil, we’d finished the food and water, we’d finished everything,” said Kurke, a 24-year-old migrant who was fleeing ethnic conflict in his homeland, the Oromia region of Ethiopia. “We were drifting in the sea, and the weather was very dangerous.” At some point on 29 or 30 March the boat was carried near to a Nato aircraft carrier – so close that it would have been impossible to be missed. According to survivors, two jets took off from the ship and flew low over the boat while the migrants stood on deck holding the two starving babies aloft. But from that point on, no help was forthcoming. Unable to manoeuvre any closer to the aircraft carrier, the migrants’ boat drifted away. Shorn of supplies, fuel or means of contacting the outside world, they began succumbing one by one to thirst and starvation. The Guardian has made extensive inquiries to ascertain the identity of the Nato aircraft carrier, and has concluded that it is likely to have been the French ship Charles de Gaulle, which was operating in the Mediterranean on those dates. French naval authorities initially denied the carrier was in the region at that time. After being shown news reports which indicated this was untrue, a spokesperson declined to comment. A spokesman for Nato, which is co-ordinating military action in Libya, said it had not logged any distress signals from the boat and had no records of the incident. “Nato units are fully aware of their responsibilities with regard to the international maritime law regarding safety of life at sea,” said an official. “Nato ships will answer all distress calls at sea and always provide help when necessary. Saving lives is a priority for any Nato ships.” For most of the migrants, the failure of the Nato ship to mount any rescue attempt proved fatal. Over the next 10 days, almost everyone on board died. “We saved one bottle of water from the helicopter for the two babies, and kept feeding them even after their parents had passed,” said Kurke, who survived by drinking his own urine and eating two tubes of toothpaste. “But after two days, the babies passed too, because they were so small.” On 10 April, the boat washed up on a beach near the Libyan town of Zlitan near Misrata. Of the 72 migrants who had embarked at Tripoli, only 11 were still alive, and one of those died almost immediately on reaching land. Another survivor died shortly afterwards in prison, after Gaddafi’s forces arrested the migrants and detained them for four days. Despite the trauma of their last attempt, the migrants – who are hiding out in the house of an Ethiopian in the Libyan capital – are willing to tackle the Mediterranean again if it means reaching Europe and gaining asylum. “These are people living an unimaginable existence, fleeing political, religious and ethnic persecution,” said Zerai. “We must have justice for them, for those that died alongside them, and for the families who have lost their loved ones.” Additional reporting by John Hooper and Tom Kington in Rome, and Kim Willsher in Paris Refugees Libya Nato Middle East Jack Shenker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I was tempted to use Palin’s new world dictionary , but resisted the urge in the headline. I also thought Condi was going to give longer interviews so I wondered if the Bin Laden PDB that she ignored would have been brought up, but it wasn’t. BEN-VENISTE: Isn’t it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB? RICE: I believe the title was, “Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.” On the flip side Condi, why have you forsaken RushBo? Doesn’t she know the consequences of never agreeing with the voice of the GOP? Fareed Zakaria’s GPS: ZAKARIA: We’re hearing some Republicans, people like Rush Limbaugh say Obama really doesn’t deserve much credit for this. You know – the operation was a routine operation. You’ve been in the White House, do you think that the President at key moments had to make difficult calls, whether to use a drone, whether to use special operations? RICE: I’ve been in the White House, and I’ve seen a president make difficult decisions. And there were difficult decisions in this. What that – what President Obama has done, indeed it was a – it was a brave decision. Now it is absolutely the case that the United States of America has been fighting this war for at least ten years, and really a bit longer. And so this is a victory across presidencies. It’s a – it’s a victory for having learned more how to fight the counter terrorism fight. But there’s no doubt that as President Bush had to make some very, very hard calls that frankly helped to set this up, President Obama had to make some very difficult calls to bring it to conclusion. She’ll always defend her old boss, but defying Limbaugh’s will could cause her incredible grief. Not only did she say it was a difficult decision, but that it was brave. Most Republicans that take on Rush always go on his show and back track what they say. Limbaugh does his best of trying to claim Bin Laden was no big deal at all and the media is building him up suddenly. And it’s not only Limbaugh acting as a Dead Ender, the entire right wing megaphone has it’s freak on They even went as far as claiming Obama removed the American flag at the Ground Zero tribute. One problem. It isn’t true. Multiple photos show that the flag was on full display when Obama arrived at Ground Zero. Tapper’s tweet was posted at 6:30 pm — hours after the President had left. In all likelihood, Tapper was saying that the flag was being removed before his live shot for ABC World News when he made his tweet.

Continue reading …
More Bad News For Libs… American Public Not Fooled By Media – Remember Obama’s Antiwar Far Left Past (Video)

Bad news for libs. An informed public is the worst thing for the socialists in the White House. And, obviously Americans are going around the state-run media to seek out the truth that the media hides from the people. In … Continue reading → Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Gateway Pundit Discovery Date : 08/05/2011 00:29 Number of articles : 2

Continue reading …
Protest planned over disability cuts

Protest organised by hundreds of disabled people’s groups to culminate with lobby of MPs Thousands of disabled people and their families and supporters will converge on Westminster this week to protest against government cuts and their impact on key benefits such as the disability living allowance and the employment and support allowance . Afterwards they will lobby MPs as the welfare reform bill reaches a critical stage in the House of Commons. Wednesday’s protest, dubbed the Hardest Hit march, is being coordinated by hundreds of disabled people’s organisations and charities and groups including Scope , Leonard Cheshire Disability , Mencap , the RNIB and Sense . Organisers say that disabled people will be hit disproportionately hard by the cuts, which, they estimate, could result in families losing £9bn of support over the next four years. Jaspal Dhani, chief executive of the United Kingdom Disabled People’s Council , said the cuts would have an adverse effect on disabled people’s rights and their ability to live independently. “We believe that disabled people stand to lose most from these cuts,” he said. “We hope to show both the government and the community at large just how fearful disabled people are about the impact the cuts will have. It’s about taking direct action because it seems government ministers are simply not listening.” Dhani said the cuts would result in disabled people being institutionalised and treated unfairly as local authorities try to save money by cutting funding to the bodies that support them. Rebecca Rennison, co-chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium ‘s policy group, agreed that disabled people were likely to feel the cuts far more keenly than the rest of the population. “They’re experiencing the same cuts as everyone else and then experiencing additional ones, so it’s cuts on top of cuts,” she said. “The disability living allowance (DLA) is vital to people’s independence. They are taking away the mobility component that pays for things like taxis and allows people to get out of their homes. The impact will be devastating and people are saying enough’s enough. That’s why people from all over the country are coming to London to make their views known.” The rally will begin on Victoria Embankment on Wednesday morning and move to Westminster. Protesters will then lobby MPs in Westminster Hall and Methodist Central Hall. between 13.30 and 17.30. Disability Welfare London Karen McVeigh Sam Jones guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libyan woman ‘raped by troops’ flees

Iman al-Obeidi has reportedly been given refuge in Tunis after escaping with help of defecting military officer Iman al-Obeidi, the Libyan woman who claimed she was raped by Muammar Gaddafi’s soldiers, has reportedly fled to Tunisia with the help of a defecting military officer. Obeidi, who drew worldwide attention when she burst into a Tripoli hotel to describe to foreign journalists her alleged ordeal at the hands of 15 men, has been given refuge in Tunis by western officials. Obeidi told CNN she had entered Tunisia with a refugee document and was considering her next move. She claimed her court case against the soldiers – who she said had seized her at a checkpoint near Tripoli – had barely progressed. After passing numerous checkpoints disguised in a veil that hid her face except one eye, Obeidi passed the Dehebi crossing on Thursday without trouble. Obeidi’s story of being brutalised by 15 drunken men over two days – some of whom she claims were close to Gaddafi’s inner circle – has become a rallying call for revolution. Her ordeal has been seized upon by members of the revolutionary council in Benghazi. She was dragged away from reporters at the Rixos hotel on 26 March after she started angrily detailing her alleged attack. Government officials promptly labelled Obeidi a prostitute and suggested she may have been a provocateur sent by rebels from eastern Libya, from where part of her family reportedly hails. It is rare in Libyan society for a woman to go public with a claim of rape, which is widely seen as dishonouring the victim and her family, rather than the attacker. Obeidi was initially jailed, but was freed under an order from Gaddafi’s son Saadi, and had since been with her family in Tripoli. The vicious standoff between Gaddafi loyalists in west Libya and western-backed rebels in the east shows little sign of ending. Nato jets have been largely absent from the skies since Wednesday. Several regime targets were hit over the weekend in the western mountains, where rebels maintain their only anti-government foothold in the west of the country. In Tripoli, some queues for fuel stretch for several miles. Bread too is in drastically short supply with bakers fled to their native Egypt when fighting erupted in mid-February yet to return. The economic siege of the capital is clearly taking a toll, with many stores in the old city remaining closed and almost all construction sites having ground to a halt. Libya Middle East Arab and Middle East unrest Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …