Peers describe David Cameron’s intervention in case – after Kate McCann’s open letter to Sun – as PR exercise Two peers who are members of police watchdogs warned that the independence of the Metropolitan police was under threat after the prime minister brought in Scotland Yard to review the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Insiders at the Yard played down any suggestions that their role could quickly lead to any breakthrough in the case, saying that the review, which will cost millions of pounds, could take months or even years. Labour’s Lord Harris, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, accused David Cameron of bowing to Rupert Murdoch’s empire, referring to Cameron’s decision to call in Scotland Yard after Kate McCann wrote an open letter in the Sun asking for his help. Lord Bradshaw, the Liberal Democrat peer and vice-chairman of Thames Valley Police Authority, added his voice to the criticism, describing the prime minister’s intervention as a PR exercise. “I am mightily worried about the politicisation of the police force. What appears on the face of it to be fairly innocuous orders – it’s a fairly short step from there to telling the police they have got to investigate this rather than that,” Bradshaw said. Harris said: “This … is entirely predictable in terms of the ‘pulling power’ of News International on Government policy … However, his [Cameron's] intervention drives a coach and horses through the draft protocol issued by the Home Office designed to preserve the operational independence of the police.” Writing on his blog , the peer added: “I can imagine that the senior leadership of the Metropolitan police are not exactly happy about this. It again embroils their officers in a high-profile investigation, where the chances of success are unclear, and which will divert limited investigative resources away from other matters.” In a statement Scotland Yard denied it had been ordered to review the abduction. It said that the commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, received a request which he considered and decided on balance that it was the best course to take. Kerry Needham, the mother of Ben Needham, the British toddler who was abducted on Crete 20 years ago, said: “I am pleased for the McCann family and look forward to the government offering the same support to all the families with children missing abroad.” If the Yard is given access to all the Portuguese documentation the first task will be to have it translated. As part of the review the Met’s team – likely to be led by a detective chief inspector within the homicide command – will also examine files held by Leicestershire police, the McCanns’ home force, who gave some help to the Portuguese officers. There is also documentation from a number of private investigators hired by the McCanns over the last four years. Although there was irritation among senior figures at Scotland Yard at being bounced into an inquiry, one source predicted that it would be quickly overtaken by a desire to do the best job possible. “It was political. But at the end of the day a child is missing.” The Met has a copy of a review into Madeleine’s disappearance completed by Jim Gamble, when he was head of Ceop, the child exploitation and online protection centre. It is understood to recommend that Scotland Yard be brought in to work with the Portuguese police on a review, but his report has been sitting on the home secretary’s desk for more than a year until this week with no action taken. Scotland Yard released the letter to Sir Paul from Theresa May on Thursday. In it the home secretary says diplomatic contact has been made with the Portuguese police, who have indicated they would co-operate with Scotland Yard. But she made clear it would be down to the Yard to negotiate the details. The McCanns repeated their thanks to Cameron, saying the Met’s involvement was a positive step. Madeleine McCann David Cameron Metropolitan police Police The Sun Sandra Laville guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Trainee Pakistan soldiers killed after graduation party • Two suicide bombers launch separate attacks within minutes When Osama bin Laden’s Pakistani supporters strike back, this is what it looks like: twisted metal, scattered suitcases and body parts; blood and savagery. The Taliban said the vicious double suicide bombing in Shabqadar, a trading town on the edge of the tribal belt in Charsadda district in north-western Pakistan, claimed the first part of the blood price they had promised to extract for the American killing of Bin Laden on 2 May. It was conducted with ruthless efficiency. Abid Khan, 24, cowered in his sweetshop when he heard the first blast and then, eight minutes later, a second. Rushing to the scene, he found some 200 trainee soldiers strewn on the road among mangled vans and a pile of bags. “It was very bad,” he said in slow, precise English. “Some people had no hand. Some people had no foot. Some heads were far away [from] the people.” He repeated himself. “It was very bad.” The dead and injured had been among 800 trainee soldiers partying just hours earlier with songs and music, having graduated into the ranks of the Frontier Corps, a poorly equipped paramilitary force drawn from the tribes of north-western Pakistan. They had just completed a six-month training course at the FC’s main training academy in Shabqadar – a British-era base with sweeping lawns and tree-lined drives – and came from districts that read like a roll-call of Taliban battlegrounds: Waziristan, Swat, Kohat, Lakki Marwat. But they barely made it out of the gate. As the young cadets left the base at 6am, clambering into buses and piling their luggage on top, a suicide bomber approached on foot then exploded his payload. More trainees rushed out to help the wounded. But eight minutes later a second bomber turned up, on a motorbike, exploding a vicious hail of ballbearings that sliced through shops, buses and flesh. By evening the death toll had reached 80, of whom 66 were FC recruits, with another 120 injured. The toll, as ever, was expected to rise. US officials are hoping to leverage outrage over Bin Laden to gain concessions from the Pakistani army. They want the military to push into Waziristan, to sever relations with militant groups such as the Haqqani network, and to arrest high-level fugitives thought to be still inside Pakistan, mostly notably Bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar. Perhaps underscoring the drive, a CIA drone fired a missile at a car in North Waziristan, killing three people in the third such attack since Bin Laden’s death. The US embassy in Islamabad did not comment, but it did issue a statement condemning the Shabqadar attack as the work of the “true enemy of the people of Pakistan”. It’s still unclear whether the army, a past master at managing the tricky US relationship, will accede to any or all of Washington’s demands. But it is sensitive to an unprecedented wave of criticism in Islamabad, where the top brass made a rare address to parliament. The army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, the chief of Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), General Ahmad Shuja Pasha, and at least three other top generals fielded questions from parliamentarians late into the evening in a session that was closed to the public. But some details leaked out – most intriguingly a claim by the country’s air chief that Shamsi airbase in Balochistan, used by the CIA to carry out drone attacks, is actually under the jurisdiction of the United Arab Emirates. But in Shabqadar, just a two-hour drive away, the repercussions of Bin Laden’s death — what one local termed the “Osama drama” – had a very real impact. The town centre was deserted, shuttered by police as the authorities cleaned up the blast site. A dozen Hiace mini-vans, crushed like tin cans, clustered outside the gates of the base. Blood-soaked rags littered the pavement. A policemen emerged from the wreckage with a fistful of ballbearings. “We are not afraid of the situation,” he said, a little unsteadily. “Everything is for Allah.” Hundreds of tiny holes pitted the shopfront behind him. A few provincial ministers came up from Peshawar, 30 miles to the south, offering soundbites for the cameras then departing in a whirl of flashing lights, horns and armoured cars. The scene was a reminder that, behind the spy games and hushed diplomatic shuffle, it is ordinary Pakistanis who have paid the price for their country’s part in the fight against militancy. Some 30,000 Pakistanis have died violently in the past decade, including 9,000 from the armed forces, according to official figures – 10 times the death toll in the US on 9/11. Commando instructor Gul Zaman, a burly man with a stone face, stood outside the crumbled barriers of the FC base, mourning his students. “They were all just young boys,” he said quietly. “Not one was over 25 years old.” A Taliban spokesman said the atrocity was the first revenge for the “martyrdom” of Bin Laden. “There will be more,” Ehsanullah Ehsan told Reuters. But senior police officials believe the bombing was more connected to the war in nearby Mohmand tribal agency, which starts just three miles from Shabqadar. Pakistan’s army has been fighting the Pakistani Taliban there for more than two years, as part of a series of rolling battles across the tribal belt. The fight is vicious. In December a Taliban suicide bomber killed at least 50 people at a public meeting; this week they assassinated one pro-government militiaman and kidnapped another. On Thursday a stray shell landed on a house in Mohmand, killing one person and wounding a woman and two children. People in Shabqadar can hear the artillery. But the suicide bombings were also a challenge to Pakistani politicians who want to spurn western assistance. A half-shredded poster at the blast site carried the image of Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician who once advocated talks with the Taliban. His supporters, including many women, protested outside parliament as the generals spoke, carrying posters that read “What are you hiding?” The message echoed widespread skepticism among Pakistanis who, despite the blasts, continue to believe in astonishing numbers that the death of Bin Laden was concocted. “It was all just a drama. Osama wasn’t really there,” said taxi driver Hakimullah Jan in Shabqadar. “The Pakistani army and the Americans are just players in this Osama drama.” Caught between army hawks, a disbelieving public and an angry America, others simply feel beleaguered, as if their country has nowhere to turn. “So we are doomed if we side with militants and doomed if we don’t,” tweeted @ghamidiview, a follower of the moderate Islamic scholar Javed Ghamidi. As evening fell in Shabqadar, a small group of staff emerged from the base, which was still shuttered, to gather up the luggage in the street. One by one, they unrolled the dead soldiers’ belongings – bundles of bedding wrapped round piles of neatly folded, military jumpers. Then they quietly rolled them up again, and carried them back into the base. Pakistan Taliban Afghanistan Global terrorism al-Qaida Osama bin Laden Declan Walsh guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Governments claims video shows attack by Nato killed11 imams and 45 wounded Muslim holy men The Libyan government has shown video of what it claims to be an attack on a guest house in the city of Al-Brega in eastern Libya where dozens of Islamic imams or sheikhs were staying as part of a peace march to the east. The gruesome images showed 11 dead imams and 45 wounded Muslim holy men – five of them in a coma – according to Libyan government officials speaking in the courtyard of a Tripoli mosque where Islamic elders and Christian Coptic priests had gathered to condemn the attack. The carnage was allegedly caused by a Nato strike in the early hours of Friday. Government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim said: “We will never accept from Nato that this was an accident. This barbaric, inhumane attack took place in the early hours. “The imams had travelled to call for brothers in the east of the country to join them in peace. “They were staying in a small guest house in the city of Brega to rest before moving on to Ajdabiya, and then hopefully Benghazi. “Is this legal under any Security Council resolution, to kill people while they sleep just awhile before they were praying for peace?” Nato was due to respond to the claim this evening at a press conference in Brussels, but did not take the opportunity to make a statement about the bombing. Muammar Gaddafi has meanwhile said in an audio recording, broadcast on state television, that he was in a place where Nato cannot reach and kill him. “I am telling the coward crusaders that I am at a place you cannot reach and kill me,” he said in the recording broadcast on al-Jamahiriya television. Nato bombed Gaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziyah compound in Tripoli on Thursday. Earlier, the Libyan government strongly rejected a claim by Italian foreign minister Franco Frattini that Gaddafi was injured in a recent strike and is no longer in the capital. Muammar Gaddafi Libya Middle East Africa Martin Chulov guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I just have to ask, now that it looks like there’s going to be a criminal investigation against John Ensign after the Senate ethics committee released their findings this week: When is that same panel going to investigate Tom Coburn further and take some action against him and his part in covering up the crimes committed by John Ensign? Here’s the entire segment from Maddow’s show where she laid out the entire scandal better than I’ve seen anyone else in our corporate media do with all of the ugly details explained fully. If you’ve got almost twenty minutes to spare and want to know what our press has largely been ignoring for the last couple of years that should have had Ensign thrown out of the Senate some time ago IMO, Rachel did a great job of explaining it here. And here’s more from the HuffPo on Coburn’s role in the cover-up — Tom Coburn Helped Cover Up John Ensign Affair: Senate Ethics Report : Sen. Tom Coburn played a more active role than previously known in the negotiations between ex-Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) and his former aide, Doug Hampton. The extent of the Oklahoma Republican’s involvement is made clear in a report released Thursday by the Senate Ethics Committee that accuses the former senator of serious criminal violations . Coburn, a friend of Ensign’s who confronted him about the adultery, became involved as an intermediary in negotiations between Ensign and Doug Hampton. The former aide sought money from Ensign in spring 2009. Coburn negotiated the payment to Doug Hampton down from $8 million to about $2.8 million, according to the report. The Oklahoma Republican’s involvement in the cover-up of the affair could lead to uncomfortable questions for the senator and his party going forward. While Ensign left the Senate hastily last week, Coburn remains an active figure. Coburn denied that he served as a negotiator when he testified for the report, but acknowledged he spoke to Hampton’s attorney, Albregts, in May 2009. The Oklahoma Republican told the Ethics Committee that he was simply planning to pass along information to Ensign. I’m sure he just thought it was the “good Christian thing to do” for his friend. Nothing to see here folks, so just move along now. This hypocrite needs to be investigated just like his buddy Ensign was, but given it took them almost two years to even go after Ensign and the Senate ethics committee’s track record, I don’t hold out much hope they’ll hold Coburn accountable. And don’t even get me started on the DOJ that was going to give Ensign a pass before this happened and the ethics panel referred the case back to them. Apparently the rule of law in this country only applies if you’re a working-class stiff who’s not politically connected.
Continue reading …Mamata Banerjee wins crushing victory over communists in West Bengal, while Jayalalithaa triumphs in Tamil Nadu Mamata Banerjee spent Friday morning listening to classical music while finishing an oil painting. By the evening she was in charge of state with a population of 90 million, after winning a crushing victory over the Indian Communist party and putting an end to three decades of leftwing rule in West Bengal. Her victory came as results from a string of state elections across India consolidated female politicians in some of the country’s most prominent positions. In the vast southern state of Tamil Nadu, Jayalalithaa, a former movie star who goes by one name, swept aside the incumbent government in an acrimonious fight fuelled by corruption allegations. Ramachandra Guha, a political historian and analyst, said the results were unprecedented. “You don’t want to go too far as huge problems of gender inequality, foeticide, oppression and discrimination against women remain in India but it is still exceptional to have so many very powerful women at one time,” Guha said. Sonia Gandhi, the president of the Congress party, remains the most influential single politician in the country. Other prominent female politicians include Sheila Dikshit, the chief minister of the capital, Delhi, and Mayawati, who runs the vast state of Uttar Pradesh. The president of India, a largely ceremonial position, is also a woman, Pratibha Patil. The victory of Banerjee’s All India Trinamool Congress had been widely predicted. The Communist party in West Bengal has seen its once powerful support base weakened by corruption, poor administration, a series of land protests and a failure to bring any serious economic growth. Vinod Mehta, editor of Outlook news magazine, said the party had lost power because of “more than three decades of misgovernment and dogma”. Banerjee said hers was a victory “of hapless people who have faced exploitation, violence and discrimination”. But some analysts have reservations about her ability to deal with the problems facing West Bengal, where poverty in many areas is equal to that in sub-Saharan Africa. Elsewhere in India, about 142 million people’s votes were counted in four states and one city, Puducherry. More than 800 counting stations were set up, protected by nearly 20,000 security personnel. In the southern coastal state of Kerala, communists also lost – though by a slim margin – to the Congress party, who lead a governing coalition at national level. But in Tamil Nadu, the governing party’s local allies were ousted in what is seen as a win for anti-corruption campaigners. The DMK party was deeply implicated in the biggest graft scandal to hit India for decades: the allegedly fraudulent sale of telecoms licences which has been calculated to have cost the nation £25bn . Jayalalithaa won despite allegations that her opponents handed out free televisions, laptops, saris and other gifts including cash in return for support, and her victory was seen as a reflection of growing outrage over political graft. “It’s a hugely important development. It shows that concern about corruption is not just confined to the urban educated elite as many of the politicians have been saying,” said Mehta, of Outlook. “It’s very good news for democracy in India.” But it is Banerjee, a law and history graduate from a lower-middle-class family who wears a traditional sari with bathroom slippers and lives with her mother, who is the main focus of attention. In a country where politics is increasingly dominated by dynasties, she is an outsider. Banerjee, whose austere lifestyle is in stark contrast with that of some of India’s senior politicians, said on Friday that gender was not an issue. “It is not me, it is the people of Bengal. That I am a woman is not the issue. Without my sisters I cannot do my job but not without my brothers too,” she told the NDTV television channel. India Women Gender Jason Burke guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Labour calls for austerity programme to be eased as eurozone giants report rapid growth Fresh fears have been raised about the health of Britain’s moribund economy after the twin giants of the eurozone – Germany and France – posted rapid growth in the first three months of the year. Prompting fresh calls from Labour for an easing of the government’s austerity programme, figures showed that Germany, Europe’s biggest economy, expanded by 1.5% between January and March and has recovered all the ground lost in the global slump of 2008-9. France grew by an unexpectedly strong 1%. Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, said the data was in sharp contrast to the UK, where the economy has gone sideways over the past six months and where national output is still 4% lower than before the recession. A weather-affected 0.5% drop in gross domestic product in the final three months of 2010 was followed by a similar bounce back in early 2011. Balls said the UK’s growth record was the third weakest in the European Union, with only Greece and Portugal – both in deep financial crisis – doing worse. “These figures expose how, since George Osborne’s spending review and VAT rise, Britain’s economy has gone from the fast lane to the slow lane,” Balls said. “As our economy has flatlined, countries like France, Belgium, the Netherlands and even Spain have overtaken us while Germany is powering ahead. “We’ve gone from the top end of the economic growth league table to being stuck at the bottom just above Greece and Portugal. These figures show the huge risks George Osborne is taking.” The Treasury said the government was being forced to tackle the problems inherited from Labour. “It’s good news that our biggest export markets are growing. It also underlines how much further into the danger zone the UK was 12 months ago. The government is having to deal with a deficit four times bigger than Germany’s,” a spokesman said. “Our housing bust was second only to Spain’s. But despite this, UK homeowners and small businesses are benefiting from the same low interest rates as in Germany and France. That’s because the world has confidence in the tough decisions the government is taking.” Analysts said that Germany, which is enjoying an investment boom as well as exporting heavily to China, was entering a new “wirtschaftswunder” – miracle economy – not seen in the decades after the second world war. Using one of Osborne’s favourite quotes, a Treasury source said: “Germany shows what you can do if you fix the roof while the sun is shining.” ING’s Carsten Brzeski, of ING, a Dutch banking, insurance and asset management group, said: “By now, even the last sceptics should have come to the conclusion that the German recovery is more than just a ‘statistical effect’. In fact, with its sound fundamentals, the economy is heading towards a second wirtschaftswunder.” Financial markets were also surprised by the performance of France, which has been less successful than Germany in seizing the export opportunities provided by fast-growing economies such as China. With some of the smaller monetary union nations such as Austria and the Netherlands also posting strong growth, the eurozone overall expanded by 0.8% in the first quarter of 2011. Howard Archer, chief economist at IHS Global Insight, said: “This is almost certainly as good as it gets for the eurozone and growth seems likely to moderate over the coming months. Nevertheless, there now looks a very decent chance that eurozone GDP growth will reach 2% in 2011 for the first time since 2007. “And the GDP growth rate of 0.8% quarter-on-quarter makes the UK’s 0.5% expansion look even more paltry.” Economic policy Europe Germany France Ed Balls Labour Economic growth (GDP) Economics Larry Elliott guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Retribution granted to woman who had acid thrown in her face by man she refused to marry In a literal application of the sharia law of an eye for an eye, Iran is ready for the first time to blind a man with acid, after he was found guilty of doing the same to a woman who refused to marry him. Majid Movahedi, 30, is scheduled to be rendered unconscious in Tehran’s judiciary hospital at noon on Saturday while Ameneh Bahrami, his victim, drops acid in both his eyes, her lawyer said. Bahrami who had asked for an eye for an eye retribution in the court, was disfigured and blinded by Movahedi in 2004 when he threw a jar of acid in her face while she was returning home from work. “He was holding a red container in his hand. He looked into my eyes for a second and threw the contents of the red container into my face,” she told the court in 2008. According to Iranian media, Bahrami’s lawyer, Ali Sarafi, has said: “A very good sentence has been given and an appropriate method has been adopted so that the convict will be blinded by few drops of acids in eyes after he is rendered unconscious.” In a highly publicised dossier in November 2008, a criminal court in Tehran ordered qisas (retribution) on Movahedi after he admitted throwing acid at Bahrami, and entitled her to blind him with acid. He was also required to pay compensation to the victim. Bahrami refused to accept the “blood money” and told the court: “Inflict the same life on him that he inflicted on me.” Iranian officials have endorsed the the sentence in the hope of halting an increase in the rate of acid attacks. But human rights activists have warned against an “inhumane” sentence. The British Foreign Office urged Iran to halt the sentence. “The attack on Ameneh Bahrami in 2004 was a horrific crime,” a spokesman said. “However, we are deeply concerned by reports that Majid Movahedi’s sentence of being blinded by having acid dripped into his eyes may be carried out. “The FCO calls on the Iranian authorities to commute this inhumane punishment to an appropriate sentence in line with Iran’s international obligations and to cease the practice of corporal punishment for crimes.” Iranian media have reported that Movahedi will be blinded in both eyes but Bahrami, in an interview in 2009, said that the man would be blinded only in one eye because “each man is worth two women” under Iranian law. “The person who did this deserves to go through the same suffering. Only this way will he understand my pain … my intention is to ask for the application of the law not just for revenge but also so that no other woman will have to go through this. It is to set an example,” Bahrami was quoted by the Spanish newspaper ABC as saying. Bahrami, who has an electronics degree and worked in a medical engineering company before the attack, moved to Spain with the help of the Iranian government where she has undergone a series of unsuccessful operations. She briefly recovered half vision in her right eye in 2007 but an infection blinded her again. Bahrami has recently published a book in Germany, Eye for an Eye, based on her personal life and her suffering since she was blinded. In recent months, human rights organisations have expressed alarm over the unprecedented increase of capital punishment in Iran, which last year executed more people than any other country apart from China. Iran Middle East Human rights Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I guess the Compressional Republicans are feeling pretty good right now about their brinksmanship in the debt ceiling debate. At this snapshot of time, their extreme hard line message is resonating with majority of Americans , who do not seem to have a detailed understanding about the stakes of not raising the ceiling. No wonder Senator Mitch McConnell is out there blustering – insisting that Democrats must agree to “significant changes” in Medicare in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. The easy way to expose these guys to American public is to force them to caught up their plans in public instead of letting them hide behind their childish soundbites. Jed pointed out how McConnell and his crazy band of Congressional Republicans are bluffing : Obviously, Republicans are bluffing. Their financial backers would be furious if they refused to raise the debt ceiling and touched of a global economic crisis. So Democrats shouldn’t take the GOP threats of economic terror too seriously. Steve Benen lays out the options for both sides in light of McConnell’s predictable GOP hooliganism “strategy”: That leaves Republican leaders with two choices to get what they want. Option #1: the GOP can agree to some tax increases and Pentagon cuts as part of a grand bargain with Democrats. Option #2: the GOP can threaten to destroy the economy, on purpose, unless Democrats give in to Republican demands on entitlements. Guess which one the GOP prefers? Neither McConnell nor Boehner have been willing to speak publicly about exactly what’s on the GOP’s ransom note, but that’s part of the game, too — they’re keeping things vague so they can wait and see how far Democrats will go to fill in the blanks. With that in mind, the White House is also effectively left with two options. Option #1: tell Republicans there will be no deal and when the economy crashes, it will be their fault. Option #2: tell the GOP negotiations can proceed after Republican leaders start adding details to their own ransom note . Aahaa. There is a reason I highlighted that second option. Follow me after the split. Even the Politico, which is basically a house organ for the Congressional GOP, noted that Boehner is ” dodging specifics on debt limit cuts “: What does Speaker John Boehner want out of the debt ceiling vote? It’s now unclear, as Boehner is avoiding any specifics, dodging questions three days after calling for “trillions” in cuts. Here’s a snapshot: In a Thursday briefing with the Capitol Hill press corps, Boehner said he didn’t “want to tie myself down” on budget process reforms, refused to “lock myself into” a time frame for the trillions of dollars in savings he’s seeking. He declined to respond to whether tax increases and offsetting the debt limit hike are completely non-negotiable bargaining positions. Now is the time for Democrats to put all out pressure and make Boehner and McConnell cough up the details on their planned cuts. Make them caught up the details on how they envision gutting medicare and other programs, and hang those around their necks. We have already seen how these guys can get easily flustered if you put a little pressure on them and force them to deal with facts . Democrats need to keep pushing them to cough up their plans on how they want to cut the deficit. Make them spell out the details on their plan to gut medicare. Now is the perfect time to turn that heat up even more.
Continue reading …Internet users suspect government is interfering with method they have been using to tunnel under the ‘Great Firewall’ Chinese internet users suspect that their government is interfering with the method they have been using to tunnel under the “Great Firewall” to prevent them connecting with the outside world. Sites such as search engine Google and news site MSN have become difficult to access, they say. And a number of universities and businesses have begun warning their users not to try to evade the firewall. Since 6 May, a number of users says that internet connections via China Telecom, the largest telephone company, and China Unicom have become “unstable”, with intermittent access when trying to access sites in foreign countries using a “virtual private network” (VPN) – a preferred method of evading the blocks put up by China’s censors to external sites. Even Apple’s app store has been put off-limits by the new blocks, according to reports. The disruption has mainly affected corporate connections such as universities while home connections that use standard broadband systems have been unaffected, according to the prominent Chinese technology blogger William Long . Normally traffic flowing over VPN connections is secure because it is encrypted, meaning that the Chinese authorities were unable to detect what content was flowing back and forth over it. A VPN connection from a location inside China to a site outside China would effectively give the same access as if the user were outside China. Sites including Twitter and Facebook are blocked in China; by using a VPN linked to an outside “proxy” which acts a conduit for links to other sites, a China-based internet user could access either site directly from their computer without the authorities being able to monitor them. But this month that appears to have changed. According to Global Voices Advocacy , a pressure group that defends free speech online, the disruption follows new systems put in place in the “Great Firewall” – in fact monitoring software on the routers that direct internet traffic within and across China’s borders. The new software appears to be able to detect large amounts of connections being made to overseas internet locations. The problem has become so bad that some universities and businesses have told their users not to try to use VPNs, and only to visit “work-related” sites; to do otherwise could lead to “trouble” for the company and the users involved. China’s approach to internet connectivity has been a bone of contention between it and the international community for years. Google dithered over the fact that it would have to censor its search results in order to function inside the country; in January 2010 it withdrew from China’s mainland over allegations of state-sponsored hacking of its Gmail service . The US secretary of state Hilary Clinton has criticised the use of the Great Firewall, and earlier this week the US said it would provide $30m of funding to break web censorship in repressive regimes, and added that China had a “deplorable” human rights record and that it was a “fool’s errand” to try to hold off democratic changes such as those sweeping the Middle East. Internet China Charles Arthur guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Mitt Romney gave a speech yesterday praising his own health care plan in MA and then denounced it at the same time and then promised to abolish HCR if he’s elected as the next President. It’s been pretty entertaining watching Romney come up with idiotic excuses why he’s against Obama’s health care since parts are so similar to his own. He’s flip flopped so many times on a host of issues that hard core Tea Party activists like Katrina Pierson of Texas wants nothing to do with his candidacy and said as much to Tamryn Hall on MSNBC’s NewsNation. Hall: Is he trying to reinvent the past? Pierson: It seems that he’s trying to reinvent the past, but the reality of the situation is that Romney’s sequel is that I apologized instead of no apology simply because now he’s a walking hypocrite . Hall: So basically you do not see him as a person I assume from those words should run for President to represent the Republicans against President Obama? Pierson: No, absolutely not. The base of this movement, the conservative base the tea party movement, they’re 100% against any type of government health care, RomneyCare, ObamaCare, it’s all the same to us. He has not once apologized for what he did and he will not admit that he was wrong … She also said that the Republican party should be aware that they won’t come out and vote for him in 2012 and they should listen to the base. Most Republican insiders believe Romney is their best hope for the upcoming election since the current field looks like they are contestants from a 1970′s game show . Slate: In 2008, the so-called authenticity problem dogged him over his switchback positions on social issues such as abortion. Now it’s health care. Where does the Mitt Romney who signed health care reform in Massachusetts with an individual mandate end, and where does the one denouncing President Obama’s health care reform with an individual mandate begin? — Substantively, Romney was also confusing. When Romney makes the case for what worked in Massachusetts, the uninitiated are likely to wonder why such a success shouldn’t be a national model—like the one President Obama signed. Democratic spokesman Brad Woodhouse joked in a tweet to his colleague Hari Sevugan “Romney is making a great case for national health reform. Book him on cable tonight? As for Romney’s speech, Ezra Klein shares some thoughts: So Romney is also saying that it’s un-American for the federal government to pass and impose an individual mandate. A violation of the 10th Amendment, don’cha know. His problem, of course, is that he didn’t mention the 10th Amendment when he, like so many other Republicans , was praising, passing and selling both state-based and national individual mandates in the 1990s and early-aughts. So how exactly is he going to sum this up for the Republican primary? “The individual mandate is great policy, but as president, I pledge to oppose it”? “I believe in states’ rights first and a functional health-insurance market second”? As for the rest of the speech, it was vague and contradictory in the same places as his op-ed, so my analysis from yesterday holds up. Vote for me because I’ll repeal something I believe and passed, but I only passed it because I used my constituents as lab rats like Doctor Moreau did to test it out on my state. I’d never do that to other subjects. Are you confused? So are Republican voters.
Continue reading …