• Hit F5 or use the auto-refresh tool for the latest updates • Send your hot soccer chat to scott.murray@guardian.co.uk • It’s a No Premier League zone here. But not here! 7 min: Stoke haven’t put a thing together up front yet. I’m not sure they’ll be too bothered about that, the team look happy enough to find their feet, while snapping repeatedly at Manchester City’s heels. “I wonder: will Man City have the Sheiks here today?” asks Mark Judd. “I’ll get my coat.” And there ends the stand-up boom. 5 min: Manchester City enjoying the lion’s share of the possession. Tevez tucks inside from the left and takes this final’s first shot in anger, sending a very decent effort from the edge of the area sailing towards the right-hand side of the goal. It’s at a good height for the keeper, though, and Sorensen palms confidently out. The ball’s hacked clear. “All this talk of how the FA Cup has lost it’s shine, ruined by money, blah-der-dee-blah – you English are just spoiled with an embarrassment of riches, yearning for the past and not seeing how fantastic it is that you can’t throw a rock without hitting a fantastic football match,” opines Linda Howard. “There. I said it.” 3 min: Manchester City earn the first corner down the left. The ball’s swung into the box towards Richards at the near post, but the defender fails to connect properly. 2 min: All at bit scrappy at the moment, both on pitch and off. Both sets of fans suddenly sound a bit nervous, and the volume’s dropped dramatically. You can’t blame them. They’ll get their gamefaces on again soon. “Here in Scotland we don’t even get the FA Cup final live on telly, being saddled with a Kevin Costner movie instead,” reports poor Ryan Dunne. “Given that people play excessive TV coverage for the decline in the FA Cup’s prestige, will this mean a resurgence in its popularity north of the border?” 3pm, a traditional kick-off time for the FA Cup final which the suits in charge would be STUPID BASTARDS to change : Tony Pulis has changed out of his fancy suit, and is now sporting his usual tracksuit-and-cap ned combo. And we’re off! Stoke set the ball rolling, Walters bombing down the inside-right channel and into the box, but Hart is out quickly to pluck the long ball the striker’s chasing from the air. 2.58pm: Shakety hands, swappity pennants. 2.55pm: The teams wait in the tunnel, Manchester City zipped up in their retro tracksuit tops, Stoke City in their red-and-white-striped shirts, a sign maybe that they’re not planning to fanny about. Like anybody expects Tony Pulis’s Stoke City to fanny about. And then, with spectacular jets of fire blasting at them from pitchside, and wild cheering rolling down from the stands, the teams take to the pitch. It is on! 2.50pm: Time for the traditional FA Cup final hymn: Nice to abide with him, to abide with him, nice. And tonight’s the night the darkness deepens. 2.45pm: The atmosphere at Wembley is fantastic. Half of the stadium a sea of powder blue, the other bathed in red and white. There are a lot of flags floating around. These are two sets of fans who are really grabbing the opportunity to enjoy themselves with both hands, and are squeezing every drop out of it. Of course, for one of them it won’t last, with bitter misery awaiting, but at the moment that’s not the point. 2.30pm: “Has anyone named Rory ever won a trophy?” wonders Tony Campisi. Of course, if we’re looking for ridiculous omens, it’s not good news for Mr Delap and pals, 2011 not having been the best of years so far for Rories chasing glory . I don’t know why I keep talking about these preposterous omens. Oh yes, that’s right: it’s because I’ve got nothing else to say. Don’t worry, teams are out soon. 2.15pm: In the Premier League (and yes I know I said I wouldn’t mention it) Blackpool are currently leading Bolton Wanderers 4-3. It’s a facsimile scoreline of arguably the greatest FA Cup final of them all, the 1953 Matthews final. Could this be a sign that we’re in for a classic today? Well, no, obviously it has no bearing on events whatsoever. But to hell with logic! Could this be a sign that we’re in for a classic today? All signs point to yes! Matthew Etherington starts for Stoke City: Sorensen, Wilkinson, Shawcross, Huth, Wilson, Pennant, Whelan, Delap, Etherington, Walters, Jones. Carlos Tevez starts for Manchester City: Hart, Richards, Kolarov, Kompany, Lescott, De Jong, Barry, Yaya, Silva, Balotelli, Tevez. Today’s final promises to be: A cracker, as both teams are desperate to end their major trophy drought. Not for them the snooty attitude of the big clubs. It’s the FA Cup Final! Stoke City’s previous FA Cup finals: None; this is their first. Before this season’s romp to the final, their roll of honour in the competition amounted to three semi-final defeats: to Derby County in 1899, and to Arsenal in 1971 and 1972. The 1971 run was perhaps their most famous: only a last-minute Peter Storey penalty denied them a place at Wembley, they lost the replay, but beat Everton 3-2 in a third/fourth place play-off in front of a whopping Selhurst Park crowd of 5,031. Manchester City’s previous FA Cup finals: There have been eight of them. City beat Bolton Wanderers in 1904, Portsmouth in 1934, Birmingham City in 1956, and Leicester City in 1969. They lost to Bolton in 1926, Everton in 1933, Newcastle in 1955, and Tottenham Hotspur in 1981. Anyway, one thing that remains traditional (for now at least) is the kick-off time: 3pm. But a new snook to tradition appears to have been cocked this year, with the match being played on the same day as regular league fixtures. This shouldn’t cause too much heartache to traditionalists, however: back in the pre-war era, it used to happen all the time. When Manchester City were getting spanked 3-0 by Dixie Dean’s Everton in 1933, for example, in the first-ever cup final to feature numbered shirts (Everton wore 1-11, City 12-22), the First Division classifieds read: Arsenal 2-2 Huddersfield Town Birmingham City 0-4 Leicester City Blackburn Rovers 0-5 Aston Villa Blackpool 2-2 Wolverhampton Wanderers Derby County 3-2 Newcastle United Leeds United 0-1 Middlesbrough Sheffield Wednesday 2-0 Bolton Wanderers Sunderland 0-3 Portsmouth West Bromwich Albion 2-1 Liverpool Man City fans may like to note that, in the Second Division, Manchester United lost 3-2 away at Lincoln City. Stoke’s rivals Port Vale won 4-1 at home to Plymouth Argyle. I’ve gone well off piste here already. Welcome to the 130th FA Cup final, contested at Wembley Stadium between Manchester City and Stoke City. Now, don’t listen to the haters talking the big match down. It’s the Cup Final. The Cup Final!!! THE CUP FINAL. No matter what indignities the clowns at the FA have visited upon this event over the years – the abolition of replays, the imposition of penalty shoot-outs, exclusive terrestrial transmission rights for ITV – the old trophy’s lustre lingers on. And there’s the proof, in that burning you’re feeling right now, wishing for all the world that your team was competing today. FA Cup Manchester City Stoke City Scott Murray guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …In Annia Ciezaldo’s April 1st article in the “New York Times Magazine,” she asks, “Does the Mediterranean Diet even exist?” She suggests that since half of Spain, Portugal and Italy’s populations are overweight — with Lebanon rapidly following suit — then, contrary to popular belief, the Mediterranean people now have the worst diets in Europe. She states that the Greeks “are the fattest: about 75 percent of the Greek population is overweight.” From Ciezaldo’s perspective, the Mediterranean Diet research, which spanned over 50 years, was in fact — flawed. Research on the health benefits of the Mediterranean Diet has been well-documented and includes the Harvard School of Public Health and many esteemed medical researchers. Among them are Ancel Keys and Paul Dudley White, who later became Dwight D. Eisenhower’s cardiologist. Shortly after World War II, Keys and his colleagues set out to examine whether or not the Mediterranean dietary and lifestyle patterns were directly connected to improved health outcomes identified in Crete, Greece and southern Italy during the 1960s. These outcomes recorded the lowest rates of chronic disease in the world, and the life expectancy of adults in these regions was among the highest. This was particularly remarkable given the limited amount of medical care and services that were available to this population and the poverty these regions experienced. Keys then began the long running Seven Countries Study and monitored the lifestyle and dietary habits of 12,700 middle-aged men in the U.S., Finland, the Netherlands, and then Yugoslavia, Italy, Japan and Greece.When the data was examined, the people who were the healthiest ate a diet where fruits and vegetables, grains, beans and fish were the basis of daily meals and valued vigorous physical activity and high social interaction. At the top of the list were the residents of Crete. Scientists have intensely studied the eating and lifestyle patterns characteristic of the Mediterranean Diet for more than half a century. And with dozens of research studies, the evidence is that this way of eating and living results in an across-the-board reduction of chronic disease and increased longevity. This evidence confirmed that certain Mediterranean lifestyles and dietary patterns were connected with good health. As a result, in the 1990s, Old Ways, an internationally respected nonprofit organization, joined in partnership with the Harvard School of Public Health to provide global education and information on this important disease-preventing evidence. What the article has apparently overlooked is that the Mediterranean Diet is not just about what people eat. It is about the values, habits, relationships, quality of how food is grown and the quantity of how food consumed by these particular groups — not just how or what they eat. A point that is often missed by the media is that health is not isolated to one’s diet. The whole health of an individual is about the physical, emotional, nutritional, environmental and even spiritual components that create our overall state of health. Our dietary choices and habits can be seen as a metaphor of what the overall or whole picture of that individual’s health is expressing. We eat how we think, feel, work and behave, all of which are influenced by our environment, values, age, financial and education levels and even by our gender. Beyond just nutritional health, the Mediterranean Diet promotes a way of living that includes the following components, which could explain the positive health benefits. Intense physical activity that includes work and all its forms of movement; farming, building, planting, gardening, dancing, sports, house work, child care or any activity that provides a non-sedentary daily routine. Consuming many types and varieties of food in moderation as a form of nourishment — both physically and socially, as well as sharing with others. Meals are a part of the social and family fabric and are not taken alone. Time spent eating is relaxing, nourishing and pleasurable. Foods choices often include fruits, vegetables, whole grain bread and other cereals, potatoes, beans, nuts and seeds. Olive oil is an important monounsaturated fat source in the diet. Dairy products, fish and poultry are consumed in low to modest amounts, and little red meat is eaten. Eggs are consumed zero to four times a week. Wine, a component of social family sharing and bonding, is a dietary staple this is consumed in low to moderate amounts. Is it any surprise that Europeans, who now have McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken, electronic messaging that is replacing relationships and high credit card debt (none of which were there when the Seven Countries Study began), are becoming as obese and unhealthy as Americans are? What is missing from many “nutrition books of the week” is the organic, common sense understanding that the food we eat is just part of a multi-faceted set of choices we make in how we choose to live and behave. Many of these choices are based on our personal and collective social values. I was recently asked, in a conversation with an advisor to the U.S. Surgeon General, what I thought was the solution to health care cost reduction. I stated and firmly believe that until we as a nation return to the values we embraced and lived by up until the mid-1980s, a time when the “The Lifestyles of The Rich and Famous” became the national obsession, we will remain a nation of countless individuals who feel in many ways marginalized from contributing our skills and talents — who are hungry to be seen, heard and valued. This lack of belonging leads to poor nutrition and behavior choices, which serve in our efforts to self-sooth and self-medicate, as the world we inhabit continues on its trajectory of financial and societal misdirection. Yes, the Mediterranean Diet does exist, but the values that make it a healthy way of life are rapidly fading.
Continue reading …Last year, MSNBC and other so-called “news” outlets mercilessly attacked Kentucky Senatorial candidate Rand Paul for giving an honest libertarian answer to Rachel Maddow concerning the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On Friday's “Hardball,” Chris Matthews tried the same tactic on Paul's father Ron, but the elder Texas Congressman was ready for the question and ended up making the host look rather silly for asking it (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Let me ask you. The `64 civil rights bill — REPRESENTATIVE RON PAUL (R-TEXAS): Total — total — MATTHEWS: The `64 civil rights bill, do you think an employer, a guy who runs his shop down in Texas or anywhere has a right to say, if you`re black, you don`t come in my store? Readers are reminded that last May, Matthews' colleague Rachel Maddow asked a similar question during her interview with Paul's son Rand. When he gave an honest, libertarian answer, the media pounced on him as a racist. This of course included MSNBC which did segment after segment attacking Rand leading him to tell a Louisville radio station, “I need to be very careful about going on certain networks that seem to have a bias.” Clearly aware of what this pathetic excuse for a “news” network did to his son last year, Ron was ready, willing, and able to parry the blow: PAUL: Well, I believe — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: That was the right under — that was the libertarian right before `64. Was it the better society? PAUL: I believe — I believe that property rights should be protected. Your — your right to be on TV is protected by property rights, because somebody owns that station. I can`t walk into your station. So, right of freedom of speech is protected by property. The right of your church is protected by property. So, people should honor and protect it. This gimmick, Chris, it`s just — it`s off the wall when you, I`m for property rights and states` rights; therefore, I`m a racist. I mean, that`s just outlandish. MATTHEWS: No. I`m just asking you — (CROSSTALK) PAUL: Wait. Wait, Chris. Wait, Chris. People who — let`s say that law was there, and you could do that. Who`s going to do it? What idiot would do that? What idiot would do that? MATTHEWS: Everybody was in the South. I saw the white — I saw the “white only” signs driving through the South in college. Of course they did it. You remember them doing it. PAUL: Oh, yes, yes. Yes, but I also know that the Jim Crow laws were illegal, and we got rid of them under that same law. And that`s all good. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Right. Well, you would have voted against that law. PAUL: Pardon me? MATTHEWS: You would have voted against that law. You wouldn`t have voted for the `64 civil rights bill. PAUL: Yes, but not in — I wouldn`t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws. (CROSSTALK) See where this is going? As NewsBusters has been reporting for months, MSNBC's goal is to make every Republican presidential candidate look racist. With 9 percent unemployment, $4 gasoline, rising food costs and plummeting housing prices, Barack Obama's cheerleaders know they're going to have to get the public's attention off the economy for him to get reelected. The answer: make every contender a racist, and the man that gets a thrill up his leg at the mere mention of the name “Obama” is more than willing to do his part: MATTHEWS: But you would have voted for the — you know you — oh, come on. Honestly, Congressman, you were not for the `64 civil rights bill. PAUL: Because — because of the property rights element, not because it got rid of the Jim Crow law. MATTHEWS: Right. The guy who owns a bar says, no blacks allowed, you say that`s fine. PAUL: No, Chris, you`re demagoguing it now. You know that isn`t what I`m saying. MATTHEWS: No, I`m asking a question. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Well, what`s the answer? What`s your answer? (CROSSTALK) PAUL: You know, segregation was created by government laws. Slavery was created by government laws. Segregation — MATTHEWS: Oh. PAUL: Let me go. Let me — segregation in the military by government laws. So, what we want to do, as libertarians, is repeal all of those laws and honor and respect people with — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: OK. Look, I have seen this. (CROSSTALK) PAUL: But for you to imply — for you to imply that a property rights` person is endorsing that stuff, you don`t understand that there would be zero signs up today saying something like that. And, if they did, they would be an idiot and they would out of business. So, I think you`re just getting overboard in order to try to turn it around and — MATTHEWS: No, I`m not. I`m asking it. I`m talking about facts. PAUL: — try to accuse somebody of being a racist. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: I`m not calling anybody a racist. I`m saying the laws are racist. (CROSSTALK) PAUL: Yes. That`s what you`re implying. That`s what you`re implying, Chris. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: I once knew a laundromat when I was in the Peace Corps training in Louisiana, in Baker, Louisiana. A laundromat had this sign on it in glaze, “whites only” on the laundromat, just to use the laundromat machines. This was a local shop saying no blacks allowed. You say that should be legal. PAUL: That`s — that`s ancient history. That`s ancient history. That`s over and done with. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Because it`s been outlawed. PAUL: Segregation on buses and all was done by law. So it was a culture. That`s over and done with, Chris. Why do you want to go back to ancient days and ancient history? It`s past. MATTHEWS: Because you want to come back — (CROSSTALK) PAUL: It`s past. And nobody is advocating it. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You`re running for president — because you`re running for president as a libertarian. Believe me, we don`t need laws to protect people. PAUL: Well, look, you are concocting and you`re reading much more into it, and you`re trying to imply certain beliefs that I don`t have. And I think you`re wrong. I think you`re wrong. MATTHEWS: No. I think you`re a libertarian. I think you`re a total libertarian. I think you`re a total libertarian. I think that is what is appealing about you. And I think people like you. PAUL: And you`re doing it deliberately. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You know why they like you? They want to live in a simpler society. (CROSSTALK) PAUL: The comparison to being a total libertarian is believing in liberty vs. being a totalitarian. (LAUGHTER) PAUL: So, if you want the opposite, just look around. That`s what we have. We have a totalitarian world. That`s what most of history has been about, totalitarianism, dictatorship. MATTHEWS: I know. PAUL: We have only had a small taste of freedom of choice and the principle of private property — MATTHEWS: OK. PAUL: — and contract rights. And we`re blowing it. MATTHEWS: OK. PAUL: So, this — this whole thing that we`re going to give up on that, what we`re doing is trying to emphasize that something good and wonderful comes from freedom — MATTHEWS: Right. OK. PAUL: — and freedom of choice, and that we should not say this, that — that liberty is disgusting, as you imply, and totalitarian should be the way we run our country. MATTHEWS: No, I`m not. I`m asking — you`re answering your own questions. PAUL: I think that`s absurd. I may not support many of Paul's views, but I sure like the way he handled this Obama-loving sycophant! Bravo, Ron! Bravo!
Continue reading …• Hit F5 or auto-refresh for the latest news • Email rob.smyth@guardian.co.uk • Follow the latest scores in the Premier League 45 min Lovely play from United. Rooney and Hernandez almost reprised the Yorke/Cole classic in Barcelona , with Rooney dummying, then picking up the ball from Hernandez before trying to play a first-time return pass. Hernandez was blocked off, but the ball came to Nani 20 yards out. He swept his shot miles over the bar. 44 min Rooney tries a cute chip from just outside the box on the right, but he overhits it and it drifts a few yards over. 43 min Nani plays a good one-two with Rooney, and Givet comes across to make a good interception. Moments later, Olsson’s excellent defensive header stops Nani’s cross reaching Valencia. Excellent defending. “Any word on how well Blackburn are defending?” honks Damian Wims. 42 min “De La Soul? Tetris?” sniffs Linda Howard. “Your age is showing.” Pass me the Werthers Original. 41 min Some more diabolical faffing from Kuszczak, who spends ages over a backpass, gawping at the ball like a moron. Hoilett charges towards him, and Kuszczak’s panicky clearance deflects off Hoilett before going out for a goalkick. It could have gone anywhere. Moments later, Evans’ cross-shot from a rtght angle on the left is pushed away Robinson. It was a fairly comfortable save. 40 min Nani, put through on goal, is wrongly flagged offside. That’s a big call. He shoots wide anyway; some Blackburn fans call for a card, but that’s only a yellow-card offence against Barcelona. 39 min A fine break from Blackburn almost brings a second goal. Salgado, 97, winces forward and drills a clever angled cross, beyond the far post and over the head of Fabio. Olsson, arriving late, thrashes a volley wide of the near post from a tight angle. He might have had time to control it first. 38 min “From my memory of Michael Stewart, if he is still approaching life in the same unique style, he’s probably starting a fight in an empty room at this very moment,” says Jon Millard. 37 min Nzonzi leaves his foot in on Fabio and is booked. 36 min ” Any chance you can link to this ?” says Alex Netherton. Why the flip not. 35 min Giggs’s low cross from the right finds Hernandez on the edge of the box, and he drives a shot on the turn with his left foot that is creeping in the bottom corner when Robinson dives to his right to palm it away for a corner. That was an excellent effort, out of nothing really. 33 min I’m a bit of a stuck record, but Blackburn have defended so well thus far. Apart from that Nani header, United haven’t really created anything of note. That said, it’s a hell of a strain mentally to keep this up for 90 minutes. It’s like a 90-minute game of Tetris. 32 min More excellent defending from Samba, who was left one on one with Rooney and blocked him off on the edge of the area. 31 min It’s not a great surprise to see United struggling a wee bit. They have won only five or their 18 away games this season, potentially the lowest total by a championship-winning side since 1977. 30 min A wonderful cross from Emerton, curved from deep on the right, is expertly headed clear by the backpedalling Ferdinand. 28 min “My biggest regret of the Ferguson era is that Paul Rachubka never made it as first choice keeper as I had a rather nifty song for the stretford end based on Kate Bush’s Babushka,” says Niall Murphy. “Oh well. I am still hoping that Have You Heard About The Berb (The Berb is the word) finds a greater audience than my increasingly pissed off friends.” I was looking at some of the lesser-known players who have been part of United’s title campaigns yesterday: Rachubka, Colin McKee, Craig Lawton (an unused sub at QPR in 1992-93 I think), Bojan Djordjic, Michael Stewart. I wonder what they’re all doing now. 27 min After a few minutes of Blackburn pressure, the game has reverted to its early pattern: United passing and moving, Blackburn diligently putting out fires all across the field. They have defended really well. 25 min “So… with Samba & Nelson being the most undervalued centre half pairing in the league, is Phil Jones of similar quality?” says Adam Hirst. “Will they still have a good pair if Samba joins Arsenal in the summer?” I haven’t seen much of him, but apparently he is extremely good and a cert to play for England sooner rather than later. 22 min The ball was very nearly out of play in the build up to the goal, but the assistant referee got the decision right. It was identical to the Gomes/Chelsea incident, in terms of how much of the ball was on the line and how much was over (around nine-tenths). GOAL! Blackburn 1-0 Manchester United (Emerton 20) That volcanic heat you can feel is coming from newspaper editors all round the country, whose plans for tomorrow’s papers might be going up in smoke. Hoilett played the ball wide to Olsson, who clipped over an excellent cross to the far post. Evans was flat-footed and Emerton, 10 yards out, swept it sweetly past Kusczak on the half-volley with his weaker left foot. 19 min A bad mistake from Kuszczak almost gives Blackburn a goal. He faffed around with Carrick’s bobbling backpass, and for a moment he thought about picking it up. Roberts was on him, and Kuszczak tried to dribble past him, and in the end it needed the covering Ferdinand to boot the ball clear. Moments later, Jermaine Jones is booked for a foul in midfield. 18 min Samba has a goal disallowed for a push on Vidic. Everybody had stopped playing, so it’s nowhere near as dramatic as it sounds. 17 min “I see Sir Alex is up on a charge again,” says Gary Naylor. “Any chance of that keeping him in the stands when the trophy is awarded? Harsh, but it would seem right somehow.” He’s been charged for saying exactly the same thing as Carlo Ancelotti and Harry Redknapp, who haven’t been charged. I’m sure it all has nothing to do with David Bernstein becoming the FA chairman. 16 min United have had 74 per cent of the possession so far, which is three times as much as they’ll have at Wembley in a fortnight. 14 min “Whilst even I think it churlish to quibble too much about SAF’s achievements, his titles have coincided with the structural advantages that accrue to the CL teams who are, literally and metaphorically, in a different league to the rest,” says Gary Naylor. “Finding a way to beat the same few challengers is more straightforward than dealing with the barbarians that massed at the gates of the top dogs of the past, the attacks coming thick and fast from all quarters from one season to the next.” That’s true up to a point, but that only applies to the last decade or so, and the Glazers have taken away many of those advantages. 13 min It’s still all United. Giggs plays a neat one-two with Rooney and then tries a through ball to Hernandez. The accomplished Samba comes across to clear. 10 min Olsson earns Blackburn’s first corner down the left. It’s headed clear by Nani, but Hoilett picks the loose ball up and runs between Giggs and Nani on the left of the box. His cut-back deflects off Ferdinand and comes to Samba, who shanks it over the bar from 12 yards. It was an awkward chance, because it bounced higher than he expected, but he probably should have scored. 9 min “Thanks for the tip re: Daniel Harris’ On The Road.,” says Kim Taylor. “For those who may be interested, Nemanja Vidic’s biography is rubbish… but it has some lovely pictures (sigh!).” Daniel’s book, I’m sad to report, doesn’t have any pictures of him in his lovely flip-flops. 8 min Hernandez wins United’s first corner off Phil Jones. It’s taken by Giggs and headed clear by Phil Jones. Giggs picks up the loose ball and stabs a dangerous cross from the right of the box that Samba boots clear. Blackburn are being under a helluva lot of pressure, and 15 seconds later Nani drags a shot wide of the near post from the edge of the box. 7 min It’s still all United, but Blackburn have defended pretty well apart from that one moment when Nani hit the bar. Salgado exemplifies that with a superb tackle on Nani. 5 min “Afternoon Rob,” says Chris Hunt. “Speaking of medals, Gary Neville will get one won’t he? Reckon he’ll pop out of the Sky box to go and fizz some champers round later?” The viewers would love him even more if he did. But no, he won’t, as he only played three games. (And should have been sent off in two of them.) 4 min Nani hits the bar! This was a real reversal of roles: Rooney drifted to the right and curved over a beautiful, Nani-like cross, and Nani got between Samba and Phil Jones to thump a header against the bar from seven yards. He probably should have scored. 3 min United have started like the home side, as you would expect, with some crisp, high-tempo passing. The away fans are in fine voice, almost certainly fuelled by industrial quantities of booze for breakfast. 2 min “Is Owen going to get a medal if he played so little?” says Mateusz. “I remember a couple years back there was a discussion whether Kuszczak would be getting it because he played in less than 10 games I believe. Do the 239 minutes spread out over 10 games? And does Bebe get one too?” Owen will; he has played 10 games, nine as sub. Bebe won’t, although the two low-flying aircraft he demolished with his crosses against Wolves count as a memento of sorts. 1 min “MUFC 19-18 YSB” says a flag in the crowd. United, in red, kick off from right to left. Blackburn are in their usual blue and white. Pic of the day that has nothing to do with this game Neil Shipperley, after . More players should let themselves go like this. More people should. Indulge yourself. It’s not a rehearsal. Team news Blackburn make two changes, with Michel Salgado and Phil Jones replacing Morten Gamst Pedersen and Mame Biram Diouf. For United, Edwin Van der Sar and Park Ji-sung have been given the day off, while Jonny Evans is preferred to Patrice Evra at left back. It may be that Evra has not fully recovered from his thigh injury, or that Sir Alex Ferguson wants more height to deal with Blackburn’s set pieces. Blackburn (4-1-3-1-1) Robinson; Salgado, Samba, Phil Jones, Givet; Jermaine Jones; Emerton, Nzonzi, Olsson; Hoilett; Roberts. Subs: Bunn, Dunn, Kalinic, Pedersen, Andrews, Santa Cruz, Mwaruwari. Man Utd (4-4-1-1) Kuszczak; Fabio Da Silva, Ferdinand, Vidic, Evans; Valencia, Carrick, Giggs, Nani; Rooney; Hernandez. Subs: Amos, Evra, Owen, Anderson, Berbatov, Smalling, Scholes. Referee Phil Dowd (Staffordshire)AQS Plug department If you’re a fan of Manchester United and/or high-class modern writing, you really should read Daniel Harris’s On The Road , which was shortlisted at the British Sports Book Awards. It’s the best United book I’ve read in years. On 22 November 1986 , Sir Alex Ferguson’s first programme notes as Manchester United manager were published ahead of the match against QPR. “A man is very fortunate if he gets the chance to manage Manchester United in his lifetime,” he wrote, “and I can assure you I have no intention of wasting my opportunity.” We are, it is safe to say without even the teensiest fear of contradiction, assured. Preamble II Sir Alex Ferguson? Bloody hell. If Manchester United draw at Blackburn today, he will win his 12th title and United’s 19th, putting them ahead of Liverpool for the first time in their history. You can argue until you’re blue in the face and purple in the nose about whether he knocked Liverpool off their perch – in reality it was a combination of George Graham, Kenny Dalglish and Graeme Souness – but the fact he has kept them and almost everyone else off that perch for the next 20 years is a mind-blowing achievement. And now he is on the cusp of the magic number. De La Soul didn’t know what they were talking about; in half of Manchester, at least, 19 is the magic number. This, more than any other, feels like Ferguson’s title rather than United’s. His Glazerphilia may be pretty unpleasant, but as a football manager he takes some beating. To win the league with this squad is a minor miracle. Some of us have made complete tools of ourselves by writing him off at various points over the last five years; yet again, the old man has bent the world to his will. Today is not all about Ferguson and United, though. Blackburn need points if they are to avoid relegation, which some would see as an appropriate punishment for the ludicrous decision to sack Sam Allardyce. Their last game is at Wolves next week, and Blackburn are so hopeless away from home – just 12 points in 18 games – that this might almost be their best chance of picking up the point they need to reach 40. United don’t win very often at Ewood Park; they have done so just twice in the league since 1998. Then again, they don’t need to win today. Nor do Blackburn. If this was a Serie A match I’d be putting my imaginary life savings on the draw. Preamble Today is an iconic day for one of the all-time greats of British football. Yes, Michael Owen is on the brink of his first title winners’ medal. It’s deserved reward for a man who has never scored 20 league goals in a season, and who has played 239 whole minutes in 2010-11, scoring one goal in the process. Hang on, let’s try that one again… Premier League Manchester United Blackburn Rovers Rob Smyth guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Eye-for-an-eye punishment of Majid Movahedi put on hold despite calls by his disfigured victim, Ameneh Bahrami, for retribution Iran has postponed blinding a man with acid following an international outcry over the retributive punishment imposed after he was found guilty of doing the same to a woman who refused to marry him. In a literal application of the sharia law of an eye for an eye, Majid Movahedi was scheduled to be rendered unconscious in Tehran’s judiciary hospital today while his victim, Ameneh Bahrami, dropped acid in both his eyes. But Iran’s semi-official ISNA news agency reported that officials had postponed the sentence on Friday night and not indicated when the punishment might be carried out in future. Bahrami, who had asked for an eye-for-an-eye retribution in a criminal court in Tehran, was not informed of the postponement. In a highly publicised dossier in November 2008 the court ordered qisas (retribution) on Movahedi after he admitted throwing a jar of acid in his victim’s face while she was returning home from work in 2004. Bahrami, who was left blind and disfigured by the attack, told the court in 2008: “He was holding a red container in his hand. He looked into my eyes for a second and threw the contents of the red container into my face.” Movahedi was required to pay compensation. Bahrami refused to accept the “blood money” and told the court: “Inflict the same life on him that he inflicted on me.” Iranian officials have endorsed the sentence in the hope of halting an increase in the rate of acid attacks. But human rights activists have warned against an “inhumane” sentence. “It is unbelievable that the Iranian authorities would consider implementing such a punishment,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, deputy director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme. “Regardless of how horrific the crime suffered by Ameneh Bahrami, being blinded with acid is a cruel and inhuman punishment amounting to torture and the Iranian authorities have a responsibility under international law to ensure it does not go ahead.” Since the attack Bahrami has undergone 17 operations, including an unsuccessful attempt to reconstruct her face in Spain. Her injuries led to the loss of one eye and although she recovered 40% of her sight in the remaining eye an infection in 2007 left her totally blind. Bahrami has consistently demanded retribution for her injuries and has insisted that the punishment be carried out. Iran Middle East Amnesty International Saeed Kamali Dehghan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …We could feed you a line about the final frontier or exploring strange new worlds, but we’ll just give it to you straight: the X-Prize Foundation has teamed up with Qualcomm to design the Tricorder X-Prize, a $10 million competition designed to boldly go where no contest has gone before. Sorry, we couldn’t help ourselves. The most recent addition to the ambitious X-Prize stable is aimed at producing a mobile medical device, similar to those used on Star Trek, that can “diagnose patients better than or equal to a panel of board certified physicians.” Said device would allow regular folks to “quickly and effectively assess health conditions, determine if they need professional help,” and then decide on a plan of action. The Tricorder X-Prize competition is still in the planning stages and should be ready to launch sometime in 2012. Full PR after the break. Continue reading X-Prize reveals plans for tricorder competition, suspiciously lacking Nimoy endorsement X-Prize reveals plans for tricorder competition, suspiciously lacking Nimoy endorsement originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 13 May 2011 09:59:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Government’s duty of care towards service personnel and their families will become legally binding for the first time The military covenant is to be recognised in law, legally binding the government to a duty of care for members of the armed forces and their families, a defence minister has said. A government statement is expected on Monday but it is unclear whether the covenant will include specific pledges. The defence minister Andrew Robathan, who is steering the legisation through the House of Commons, told the Daily Telegraph : “We are putting the military covenant on a statutory basis for the first time.” David Cameron, the prime minister, had been accused of backing away from a pledge to give the armed forces “a new military covenant that’s written into the law of the land”. The covenant is an agreement under which the state pledges a duty of care toward its military personnel in return for the sacrifices they make. At present it is not legally binding. Prior to forming government, David Cameron set up a review that he suggested would set out commitments on issues such as compensation, care for injured troops and the education of children of service personnel. But when the government published the Armed Forces Bill, which is now going through Parliament, it only required the defence secretary to issue a report on the state of the covenant. The Royal British Legion described the legisation as “pretty depressing”. Concerns over the government’s legal liability are thought to have prompted the formulation in the bill. Its passage has now been delayed. The Conservative backbencher Philip Hollobone has tabled an amendment creating formal recognition of the covenant. The Telegraph said the law would not enshrine specific pledges about individual public services but concentrate on broader principles – such as that no one should be disadvantaged because of their military service, and also that special treatment could sometimes be justified. The shadow defence secretary, Jim Murphy, said: “The prime minister appears to have finally done the right thing. If true, this is a retreat from a inevitable defeat in parliament in the face of real anger from forces families and MPs. “We will now wait to hear the detail and will want to ensure that the principles of the covenant are being properly set out in law.” At Commons question time this month Cameron denied watering down his commitment. “I do not believe for a minute that that is what is being done. What is going to happen is that we are going to clearly reference the covenant in law and then the covenant will be published and debated in this house every year,” he told MPs. “It is vital that we are able to update and improve it every year, because our military personnel face so many changing circumstances.” A government spokesman said: “Discussions are ongoing and it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.” The covenant was codified in 2000 but not made law. It states soldiers will be called upon to make sacrifices, including the ultimate sacrifice of laying down their lives. In return they and their families can expect fair treatment and to be sustained and rewarded. Officially it only applies to the army. But its core principles are taken to also cover members of the air force and navy. Military Defence policy David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …On the May 13 Fox & Friends , MRC President and NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell came abaord to recap the 2011 Media Research Center Gala and DisHonors Awards dinner held on May 7 in Washington, D.C. Anchor Brian Kilmeade started off by showing the ” Quote of the Year ,” which was “won” by MSNBC's Ed Schultz for ranting that Republicans “want to see you dead” and “make money off your dead corpse.” [For the full Fox & Friends segment, watch the video embedded after the page break or listen to MP3 audio here ]
Continue reading …On the May 13 Fox & Friends , MRC President and NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell came abaord to recap the 2011 Media Research Center Gala and DisHonors Awards dinner held on May 7 in Washington, D.C. Anchor Brian Kilmeade started off by showing the ” Quote of the Year ,” which was “won” by MSNBC's Ed Schultz for ranting that Republicans “want to see you dead” and “make money off your dead corpse.” [For the full Fox & Friends segment, watch the video embedded after the page break or listen to MP3 audio here ]
Continue reading …