3# Guerilla Art Tactics : Funky Fresh, De Realiest ft Dvc How to Get best Dazzle DVC 100 Quality without any problems Dazzle DVC 100 Quality Test (HD) Blackhawks score first DVC win of season | News Online Like their cross-town rivals, the Tigers plunged into their second round of DVC play the first week of May. They started the week 2-4 in conference, and now fin. Vega vs DVC p10 | Android Support | Android-Support.com | Support … Hello there! I have bought a tablet, its name is DVC P10 (I wanted to place a link but it is impossible for me, as I am new in the forum, but if… | Android-Support.com | Support,Reviews, News, Applications, Games and New Releases| Dvc : Pinnacle Platinum Dazzle Capture Card Setup Xbox 360 PS3 Wii … About $29.99) www.amazon.com Here is a tutorial I have put together on how to setup a Pinnacle Platinum 170 DVC Capture Card setup for the Xbox 360. If you have any questions feel free to message me or email me at wepeeler@aol.com … Latest Dvc News | GTrends WW South wins DVC title Wheaton Warrenville South’s Collin Fedor could testify to the emotion of running with the DuPage Valley Conference boys track and. West Aurora Takes Third At DVC Boys Track Meet – Chicago Sun-Times … By Rob Wollenzien For Sun-Times Media May 13, 2011 11:26PM West Aurora’s George Malina inverts on his way to the pole vaul title Friday in the DuPage Valley Conference meet at Naperville Central. | Mary Beth Nolan~For Sun-Times Media … MelanieMorales7 says: West Aurora takes third at DVC boys track meet http://bit.ly/kWWsR4
Continue reading …So the New York Times is reporting that the results of a Senate Ethics Committee investigation may leave Ensign liable for charges of obstructing an FEC investigation, violating federal lobbying bans, and making unlawful payments to the husband of the aide with whom he was having an affair. But as Mark Howard at News Corpse points out, it looks like Fox News was also part of the widespread coverup: However, any investigation of this matter needs to include possible interference on the part of Fox News and Glenn Beck-wannabe, Megyn Kelly . There is evidence that Kelly, who received a letter from Doug Hampton revealing Ensign’s infidelity, warned Ensign that the news was about to come out rather than reporting on it. As I wrote on June 19, 2009 : “Fox News knew of Ensign’s infidelity five days before Ensign came forward. They got the information from the husband of Ensign’s mistress. That’s a pretty good source, especially when he asserts that he had corroborating evidence.” First Fox denied having received any letter. Then they admitted that they had received the letter a day before the news broke. Then a FedEx receipt revealed that they had received the letter three days earlier. And Fox broadcast no stories about the Ensign affair during any of that time, or even for several days after. When Ensign came forward to confess his sins, he told the press that he was doing so because the story was about to come out in the media. So the question is: did he learn that from Megyn Kelly? The evidence strongly suggests that Kelly tipped Ensign off and set the stage for his announcement . Then she and Fox kept the story quiet in the days that followed. That is not the behavior of a “news” network. It is the behavior of an accomplice.
Continue reading …So the New York Times is reporting that the results of a Senate Ethics Committee investigation may leave Ensign liable for charges of obstructing an FEC investigation, violating federal lobbying bans, and making unlawful payments to the husband of the aide with whom he was having an affair. But as Mark Howard at News Corpse points out, it looks like Fox News was also part of the widespread coverup: However, any investigation of this matter needs to include possible interference on the part of Fox News and Glenn Beck-wannabe, Megyn Kelly . There is evidence that Kelly, who received a letter from Doug Hampton revealing Ensign’s infidelity, warned Ensign that the news was about to come out rather than reporting on it. As I wrote on June 19, 2009 : “Fox News knew of Ensign’s infidelity five days before Ensign came forward. They got the information from the husband of Ensign’s mistress. That’s a pretty good source, especially when he asserts that he had corroborating evidence.” First Fox denied having received any letter. Then they admitted that they had received the letter a day before the news broke. Then a FedEx receipt revealed that they had received the letter three days earlier. And Fox broadcast no stories about the Ensign affair during any of that time, or even for several days after. When Ensign came forward to confess his sins, he told the press that he was doing so because the story was about to come out in the media. So the question is: did he learn that from Megyn Kelly? The evidence strongly suggests that Kelly tipped Ensign off and set the stage for his announcement . Then she and Fox kept the story quiet in the days that followed. That is not the behavior of a “news” network. It is the behavior of an accomplice.
Continue reading …Cambridge beats arch rival Oxford to take first place in the Guardian ranking of UK universities Cambridge has taken the top spot in this year’s Guardian University Guide league table, breaking its arch rival Oxford’s six-year stint as the UK’s leading institution. Oxford has come second and St Andrews third, while the London School of Economics has climbed four places from last year to take fourth place. University College London, Warwick, Lancaster, Durham, Loughborough and Imperial College make up the top 10. The University Guide, published in full on the Guardian website on Tuesday, is based on data for full-time undergraduates at UK universities. The league table goes live on the website at midnight tonight. Our analysis shows that universities with low rankings are almost as likely to be planning to charge maximum tuition fees of £9,000 in autumn 2012 as those with high rankings. London Metropolitan University, which comes bottom of the Guardian tables, intends to charge between £4,500 and £9,000 for its degrees. Salford, Liverpool John Moores, Manchester Metropolitan and the University of East London – all of which rank in the bottom 20 – want to charge £9,000 for at least some of their courses. The government’s access watchdog, the Office for Fair Access, is looking at the fees each university in England wants to charge and will announce in July whether it approves. All the English universities in our top 20 intend to charge £9,000 fees, apart from London School of Economics, which has not yet decided . The first university that proposes to charge less than £9,000 for all of its courses is Sunderland, which is ranked 48th. There are a total of 120 institutions in the tables: 38 in the top half intend to charge £9,000 for at least some of their courses, while 18 in the bottom half propose to do the same. Universities are ranked according to how much they spend per student; their student/staff ratio; the career prospects of their graduates; what grades applicants need; a value-added score that compares the academic achievements of first-years and their final degree results; and how content final-year students are with their courses, based on the annual National Student Survey. Birmingham City University has fallen most since last year – 24 places, from 66th to 90th – while Middlesex is the biggest climber, reaching 75th place this year compared with 112th last year. Durham has risen from 17th place to eighth. While the oldest universities dominate the top positions in the tables, the newest have improved their rankings since last year. Winchester has leapt from 96th place to 69th. The tables, compiled by an independent consultancy firm, Intelligent Metrix, are weightedin favour of the National Student Survey. As part of the survey, final-year students are asked to score their universities for overall satisfaction, feedback and contact hours. Other league tables concentrate more on research ratings. The Guardian publishes an overall ranking table, separate tables to show which universities are best – and worst – for each subject and another table for specialist institutions. The more a university spends on each student, the more likely it is to have a high ranking and the more satisfied its students seem. However, our judges took into account that some universities do not teach expensive courses, such as engineering, and so their spending is lower. There is huge variation in how much universities spend per student, with an average of £3,428 in 2009-10 (a fall from the £3,495 the year before). At Oxford, average spend per student fell to £11,232 in 2009-10 from £11,410 the year before. The university spends substantially more than other institutions. Cambridge spent £8,612 in 2009-10, a rise from £8,118 the year before. St Mary’s University College in west London and Leeds Trinity University College spent among the lowest of all institutions per student. The tables show that Cambridge has overtaken Oxford in philosophy, law, politics, theology, maths, classics, anthropology and modern languages. However, Oxford overtook Cambridge in psychology and also came top in chemistry, business and management, and art and design. Loughborough is best for sports science, while King’s College London is top for dentistry. University College London topped the table for English, while Trinity Laban Conservatoire excelled for drama and dance. Northumbria has shot up the table for modern languages, from 48th last year to third this year. Universities with high rankings tend to have fewer dropouts, and fewer students per academic. The top 20 institutions have a drop-out rate after the first year of just 4%, compared with almost 12% for the bottom 20. There are 14.2 students per academic among the top 20, but 21.5 among the bottom 20. The smallest institutions tend to be ranked closer to the bottom. Professor David Tidmarsh, vice-chancellor of Birmingham City University, says he expects his university’s fall in position to be temporary: “It is caused by student number growth, which has now been curbed, and student satisfaction scores, which we expect to improve significantly as a consequence both of increased investment and of the way in which we are engaging students as partners in their learning experience.” He says the university is investing £180m in new buildings, facilities and equipment. Swansea Metropolitan, Wolverhampton and Liverpool Hope did not allow the Guardian to use their data. Meanwhile, the government has cut the number of places universities can offer on teacher training courses. Cambridge University, which comes top of our table for education courses, will have 49 fewer places on its teacher training course this September, an 11% cut. Altogether, almost 4,000 fewer places will be available on teacher training programmes. A spokesman from the Department for Education says pupil numbers are falling sharply in secondary schools and so the need for new teachers has gone down. • The Guardian University Guide 2012 league table of universities goes live at midnight tonight. Watch out for it on the front of the Guardian website. Subject tables and the table of specialist institutions will be available from Tuesday morning. University guide Higher education University of Cambridge Tuition fees Students Jessica Shepherd guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media [H/t Heather] 60 Minutes’ Byron Pitt had a superb segment last night on the sovereign citizens movement, springboarding from the tragic case of Jerry and Joe Kane, two sovereign citizens who mowed down a couple of West Memphis, Arkansas, police officers before themselves being killed. It was actually a well assembled and insightful piece of reporting, including the analysis provided by J.J. McNabb, who is unquestionably one of the leading experts on the movement from the outside. And while they let movement guru Alfred Adask run off at the mouth, in the end his own radicalism and complete lack of any connection to reality were made self-evident by his own words. The only question is: Will Peter King finally listen and hold a congressional hearing on right-wing-extremist domestic terrorism, too? The story particularly featured the work of Bob Paudert, the police chief in West Memphis father of one of the two slain officers. We’ve discussed Paudert’s work previously (more here ). He’s been adamant that the information that could have saved his officers that day hadn’t been disseminated to them because it was being bottled up. Why is that happening? Well, as we noted then, we need look no further than the right-wing shriekosphere, which has done everything it can to demonize factual reportage of the actual threat of domestic terrorist activity from right-wing extremists: , The incident was yet another reminder that one of the most significant ongoing threats to law enforcement officers in this country comes from right-wing extremists of the Patriot/”sovereign citizen” variety — people who take Republicans’ government-bashing rhetoric to its illogical extreme and declare themselves free of federal laws and functionally laws unto themselves. There are constant reminders of this threat — from the Hutaree Militia to the Richard Poplawskis out there. Of course, we all were witness to the right-wing shrieking over that Department of Homeland Security bulletin warning police officers around the country about the nature of this resurgent threat. That’s because conservatives are more concerned about whitewashing away these embarrassments than they are with the lives of police officers. They like to use dead cops as props to attack liberals while loudly arguing, as Glenn Beck did a couple years ago, that even paying attention to such right-wing threats is a smear of mainstream conservatives. Ironically, Glenn Beck was nattering at length on his Fox News show this week claiming that left-wing extremists are about to start killing police officers en masse, which is why they need to destroy their unions. Right. The unfortunate reality is that federal officials are almost certainly not sharing this vital intelligence with police officers because, whenever they do, they’re viciously and loudly attacked by right-wing pundits for allegedly smearing mainstream conservatives. Amazingly, no one in the mainstream media seems to have yet cottoned to the fact that this really is a near-outright confession of complicity . Indeed, domestic terrorism is sharply increasing in the past two years, as evidenced by the 22 incidents and counting we’ve documented involving right-wing extremists committing acts of violence against “liberals” and government targets. But because right-wing talkers only want to discuss terrorism as a “Muslim” phenomenon , we’re getting a badly skewed understanding of the nature of terrorism. Here’s that map — and many of these indeed involve crimes committed by self-described “sovereign citizens”: Click on map to see interactive version.
Continue reading …The President’s secret meetings with Fareed Zakaria – the same reporter who openly used a CNN network broadcast to promote Obama in 2008 – show a clear and disturbing double standard at CNN. For decades, the liberal media have repeatedly condemned conservatives in the media who communicated privately with Republican presidents. They furiously attacked George Will in 1980 when he advised candidate Ronald Reagan, and trounced on Roger Ailes when he sent President Bush a note about the new war on terror in the wake of September 11th.
Continue reading …Imogen Thomas fails to overturn gagging order surrounding unnamed Premier League footballer The Big Brother star who on Monday failed to overturn a high court gagging order brought by a Premier League footballer denied accusations that she attempted to blackmail the player. Imogen Thomas, 28, denies attempting to solicit £100,000, a signed football shirt, and matchday tickets from the high-profile footballer in order not to speak out about their alleged six-month affair. Mr Justice Eady on Monday refused a joint bid by Thomas and the Sun newspaper to overturn the high-profile footballer’s privacy injunction — before setting out his reasons for doing so in an eight-page judgment. Eady said there was “ample reason not to trust” Thomas, and said the evidence before the court on 14 April “appeared strongly to suggest that the claimant [the anonymous footballer] was being blackmailed”. He later records that she denies asking the footballer for money and that he has come to no conclusion on the allegation. The footballer accused Thomas of repeatedly demanding £50,000 from the footballer in March. He agreed to meet her “in a hotel where he was staying” in April. There he gave her “a signed football shirt” but said he was not prepared to give her “the sum of £50,000″. She asked to see him again shortly afterwards to which “he agreed with reluctance” and provided her with some football tickets. Although the position was “by no means clear” Mr Justice Eady said he believed that evidence “appeared to suggest” that the reality TV star arranged two hotel meetings with the player apparently “in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists”. The player claimed that on 13 April, he texted Thomas to say that he might be willing to offer her some money after all. At this point, Thomas is accused of attempting to solicit £100,000 from the player. “The evidence before the court at that point, therefore, appeared strongly to suggest that the claimant was being blackmailed (although that is not how he put it himself),” Eady said on Monday. “I hasten to add, as is obvious, that I cannot come to any final conclusion about it at this stage. I have to make an assessment of the situation on the limited (and untested) evidence as it now stands.” However, Eady added: “I now wish to make it clear that, shortly before this judgment was handed down, Mr Price [David Price QC, Thomas's lawyer] stated on his client’s behalf that she denies either causing the publication in the Sun on 14 April or asking the claimant for money.” Eady ruled the footballer, who brought the privacy injunction last month, is “entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy”, and that there has been “no countervailing argument” to suggest that the rights of Thomas and the Sun to freedom of expression should prevail. He added that there was “no suggestion of any legitimate public interest in publishing” the story. In a ruling likely to have far-reaching consequences for similar so-called “kiss and tell” stories, Eady ruled that “as in so many kiss and tell cases … the answer is not far to seek”. The Sun, he said, had not even argued that the story was in the public interest. Eady added: “The majority of cases over the last few years … would appear to be of the so-called ‘kiss and tell’ variety and they not infrequently involve blackmailing threats. Blackmail is, of course, a crime and in that context the courts have long afforded anonymity to those targeted as a matter of public policy. This has not hitherto been questioned.” Thomas was in court for the ruling on Monday. In a statement on behalf of Thomas by her lawyer, the Big Brother star said she was “stunned” with how she was portrayed in the ruling. In a statement released just after the hearing, she said: “What’s more I can’t even defend myself because I have been gagged. If this is the way privacy injunctions are supposed to work there is something seriously wrong with the law.” • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . Media law Privacy & the media The Sun News International National newspapers Newspapers Newspaper formats Superinjunctions Premier League Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Former Big Brother contestant and the Sun fail to overturn injunction taken out by Premier League footballer • Read the judgment in full Imogen Thomas, the former Big Brother contestant whose relationship with a married Premier League footballer was made the subject of a court gagging order, has failed in a joint bid with the Sun to overturn the injunction. Thomas said on Monday she was “stunned” following the high court judgment by Mr Justice Eady and claimed there was “something seriously wrong with the law”. “Yet again my name and reputation have been trashed while the man I had a relationship with is able to hide,” said Thomas, speaking outside the high court. “What’s more I can’t even defend myself because I have been gagged. If this is the way privacy injunctions are supposed to work there is something seriously wrong with the law. “I have read the judgment and I am stunned by how I am portrayed.” Thomas was speaking after Eady explained why he made an order banning journalists from reporting the identity of a footballer involved in a relationship with the reality television contestant. He also issued a written account of his reasons for making the order after listening to arguments from lawyers representing the footballer, Thomas and the Sun newspaper at a private hearing.
Continue reading …Chinese authorities allow wife, Lu Qing, to visit artist and activist who had not been seen since arrest at Beijing airport on 3 April Detained artist Ai Weiwei seems to be in good physical health but mentally conflicted and tense, his wife has said after seeing him for the first time in six weeks. Lu Qing said she was taken to see her husband for about 20 minutes on Sunday afternoon, the first contact friends and relatives have had with the 53-year-old Chinese artist and activist since officials stopped him at Beijing airport on 3 April. It is not clear where he is being held and the people who arranged the visit did not show her identification, she added. “I could see redness in his eyes. It was obvious that without freedom to express himself he was not behaving naturally even with me, someone from his family,” Lu told Associated Press. “He seemed conflicted, contained, his face was tense.” The couple sat across the table from each other and their visit was supervised by two people, one “who seemed to be in charge of Ai”, and another who took notes. “We could not talk about the economic charges or other stuff, mainly about the family and health,” Lu said. “We were careful, we knew that the deal could be broken at any moment, so we were careful.” Ai was not handcuffed, was wearing his own clothes rather than a uniform, and retained his beard. He said he had his blood pressure checked several times a day and had received medication he needed for diabetes. He was able to exercise by walking and said he was eating and sleeping well. “The fact that Lu Qing could see him was already a very merciful act by the authorities,” his mother, Gao Ying, said, adding that Ai did not discuss his charge beyond saying he “did not understand it”. She added: “The rumours that we’ve heard about him being tortured have been too much for us to take, but now seeing is believing. His condition is good.” Gao said her son had been particularly concerned about her health. “Of course [Lu] had to tell him that I’m doing well and not that I’m at home crying everyday … He was very moved and tears welled up in his eyes,” she added. Ai’s sister Gao Ge said: “Now that we’ve seen that his health is OK, of course we are a bit less anxious, but that’s not to say we want him to stay where he is … We really want this case to be dealt with as soon as possible and for the government to follow proper procedures in keeping with Chinese law.” Liu Xiaoyuan, a lawyer who has said he is willing to represent the artist if necessary, said Ai was not in a jail or a detention centre, but that neither Lu nor Ai were sure where he was being held. He said police had still not informed Ai’s family of detention and that he suspected the artist was being held under residential surveillance. Joshua Rosenzweig of the Dui Hua foundation, which supports political prisoners, said the law did not spell out whether police should notify family members of the measure because normally it would be carried out at an individual’s home. Residential surveillance orders last around six months. In comparison, police must inform relatives of detention within 24 hours, unless it would impede the investigation, and report to prosecutors on the case within a month. “[Residential surveillance] is supposed to be less punitive but the way it is being carried out – if it is – is really turning things on its head. It is much more advantageous to police. There are very few limits on their ability to interrogate you,” added Rosenzweig. Ai’s case comes amid a broader crackdown on lawyers, dissidents and activists in recent months. His friend Wen Tao, 38, driver and cousin Zhang Jinsong, also known as Xiao Pang, 43, accountant Hu Mingfen, 55, and colleague Liu Zhenggang, 49, all remain missing. Officials have said Ai is under investigation for suspected economic crimes. Last week, the vice-foreign minister, Fu Ying, said it was “very condescending for the Europeans to come in to tell China that some people are beyond the law” . But relatives believe his detention is retaliation for his social and political activism. Gao Ying told CBS recently: “I think in reality, he was taken because he was protecting the rights of ordinary citizens and speaking for them … I think … he offended people in power and they hate him, so now they are looking for an opportunity to take him down.” Ai Weiwei China Human rights Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Prime minister says challenges of ageing population and need to save £20bn in NHS spending over next four years mean status quo not an option David Cameron has warned that the NHS will face a funding crisis unless major reforms are introduced at the end of the government’s “listening exercise”. In a speech to NHS staff at Ealing Hospital in London, the prime minister attempted to reassure the medical profession by professing his love for the NHS. But he said the twin challenges of an ageing population and the need to save £20bn in NHS spending over the next four years, identified by the previous government, meant the status quo was not an option. Cameron, who said the government would respond to the findings of Steve Field’s “listening exercise” by the end of next month, outlined some of the key changes to the health and social care bill, including: • New GP-led consortia, which will replace primary care trusts, will have a wider membership. Hospital doctors will be more closely involved. • Competition will not be introduced to the NHS “for its own sake”. • There will be no cherry-picking of NHS services by private companies. • The NHS will look reasonably similar after the changes, and will not become a “space age institution”. Cameron wanted to use the speech to show that changes will be introduced to the social care bill and also to reassure Conservative MPs – who raised concerns at a meeting of the 1922 committee last week – that he is not being forced to change tack under pressure from the Liberal Democrats. The prime minister told that meeting he, and not the Lib Dem leader and deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, had decided to pause the bill. Cameron also commended Field, who was present for the speech, for his independence of thought after he raised concerns about the original health reforms. Field praised the prime minister for sanctioning a “real listening exercise”. NHS Health GPs Doctors David Cameron Conservatives Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats Liberal-Conservative coalition Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …