The annual inflation rate is at its highest since October 2008, according to the Office for National Statistics Inflation in Britain jumped to its highest level in two-and-a-half years last month, owing to soaring travel costs around Easter and higher duty on alcohol and tobacco. The annual increase in the consumer prices index to 4.5%, from 4% in March, wrongfooted the City and intensifies the dilemma for the Bank of England over how much longer it can keep interest rates low to support the flagging economy. It means governor Mervyn King will have to write another letter to the chancellor, George Osborne, to explain why inflation is so far above the Bank’s 2% target. Consumer prices rose 1% in April from March, taking the annual inflation rate to the highest since October 2008, according to the Office for National Statistics. City economists had only expected a small rise to 4.2%. “Although inflation was expected to jump back up, the magnitude of the increase is surprising. However, the ONS has said the timing of Easter had a significant impact on the data, so we would interpret them with an element of caution,” said Hetal Mehta, UK economist at Daiwa Capital Markets. However, Mehta does not expect the Bank to raise rates in response to high inflation until early next year. “While inflation still remains well over the Bank’s target – and is likely to rise even further in the next couple of months as higher commodity prices feed through – the current inflationary forces are largely temporary in nature, and a marked fall in January next year is expected once the VAT increase falls out of the calculations. As such, we still think the Bank will look through the short-term spike.” “Core” inflation, which strips out volatile items such as food and fuel, rose to 3.7%, the highest on record. Inflation has been above the Bank’s target since the end of 2009 and the central bank warned in its latest projections last week that it could hit 5% later this year, although it believes that most of the factors pushing up prices are temporary. The ONS travel costs rose because of the unusually late timing of Easter this year. In previous years, some of this was reversed the following month. The annual retail prices inflation (RPI) rate, which includes more housing costs and is the benchmark for pensions and many wage deals, eased to 5.2% from 5.3% in March. Inflation Economics Bank of England Julia Kollewe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn swaps luxury hotel suites for spell in tough prison often featured in crime dramas The IMF chief, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a man accustomed to luxury hotel suites and first-class travel, will make his home for now at New York City’s notorious Rikers Island jail. Strauss-Kahn was transferred from a detention centre attached to the Manhattan criminal court to Rikers Island on Monday, and held in protective custody in a 3 metre by 4 metre (11ft by 13ft) cell, a spokesman for the New York City department of correction said. A judge earlier on Monday denied Strauss-Kahn bail on charges he attempted to rape a hotel maid and set his next court date for Friday. Both Rikers and the courthouse detention centre, known as “the tombs,” are harsh, loud and dangerous. “It’s crowded and the food is terrible. And one of the dangerous things is famous people are preyed upon,” said Gerald Lefcourt, a well-known defence lawyer, referring to both places. “There are really heavy-duty prison bars and gates that make a lot of clanging sounds every time they are open and closed,” Lefcourt said. Defence lawyers said they were considering whether to appeal the bail ruling. Should the judge reaffirm the denial of bail, Strauss-Kahn could be held at Rikers throughout any trial. Strauss-Kahn checked into Rikers Island’s west facility, the smallest of the 10 jails in the complex and designed to care for inmates with communicable diseases, the spokesman said. Although Strauss-Kahn is healthy, the design allows him to be separated from any inmates who might seek fame by attacking someone famous. He is one of 25 to 30 inmates in the facility but will be kept from other inmates when he leaves his cell to stretch his legs, watch television in the common room or exercise. “This is not about isolating the inmate from any human contact, this is about preventing the inmate from being victimised or harmed in some way as a result of his high profile,” said the spokesman. Lights go out at 11pm. He is allowed three visitors a week aside from his lawyer and he will be given one hour a day for exercise. Strauss-Kahn was issued bedding and a standard toiletry kit of a drinking cup, soap, shampoo and toothpaste, the spokesman said. The Rikers complex, which is on an island in the East River near LaGuardia airport, is well-known to viewers of television and film crime dramas as the place where criminal suspects are sent pending trial or to serve short jail sentences. The island can be reached via a bridge from the borough of Queens. Dating to the 1930s, Rikers holds about 11,000 inmates on any given day. Dominique Strauss-Kahn IMF France New York United States Europe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Irish army forced to make safe a viable bomb found on bus near Dublin on eve of historic royal visit A bomb has been found near Dublin as the Queen is due to arrive in Ireland for a historic visit that has been hailed as an “extraordinary moment” in the country’s history. The Irish army was forced to make safe a viable improvised explosive device found on a bus in County Kildare late on Monday night. The discovery threatens to overshadow the Queen’s four-day visit, the first by a British monarch to the Republic of Ireland, although the Foreign Office has said she will still travel to Dublin on Tuesday. An unprecedented security operation, costing about €30m (£26.2m), is in place to safeguard the Queen and Prince Phillip. It includes land, air and sea patrols and a “ring of steel” around the centre of the Irish capital, where the main thoroughfare, O’Connell Street, has been closed to traffic. The bomb was discovered in the luggage compartment of the vehicle at a bus stop on the outskirts of Maynooth. An engineering unit from the Irish Defence Forces arrived at 11.10pm after receiving a request from the Garda Siochana. An Irish military spokesman said a controlled explosion was carried out close to a hotel and the scene was declared safe at 1.55am. The remains of the device were handed over to the Gardai for investigation. The army is currently dealing with a bus alert on the LUAS tram line in Dublin. The bomb discovery comes after a dissident republican terror alert brought parts of London to a standstill on Monday. Some opposition to the royal visit has been voiced as dissident republican violence rises. But both the British and Irish governments say they hope the official trip will hasten a new and better relationship between the people of Ireland and Britain, built on equality and mutual respect. The prime minister, David Cameron, will join the Queen on Wednesday for part of her trip, highlighting the importance of the visit, and the foreign secretary, William Hague, will accompany the royals throughout their stay, as part of normal practice. The Irish president, Mary McAleese, interviewed by state broadcaster RTÉ for a documentary to be screened on Tuesday night, said: “I think it is an extraordinary moment in Irish history. A phenomenal sign and signal of the success of the peace process and absolutely the right moment for us to welcome on to Irish soil Her Majesty the Queen, the head of state of our immediate next-door neighbours, the people with whom we are forging a new future, a future very, very different from the past, on very different terms from the past and I think that visit will send the message that we are, both jurisdictions, determined to make the future a much, much better place.” The Irish taoiseach, Enda Kenny, has said the Queen will receive a warm welcome from the Irish people, who would have opportunities to meet her. The royal tour will take in Dublin and the counties of Cork, Kildare and Tipperary. In Dublin, the Queen will visit several politically and historically significant sites, such as Croke Park, the scene of a massacre by British troops, and the Garden of Remembrance, which honours those who fought for Irish freedom. She will also be guest of honour at events at Trinity College, the National War Memorial Gardens in Islandbridge, and the Guinness storehouse. Cork and Cashel are also on the agenda, along with a private visit to Coolmore, an international thoroughbred racehorse stud in Tipperary. The Queen’s grandfather George V was the last reigning monarch to visit the republic in 1911 when it was still part of Britain. The bitterness caused by the partition of the island a decade later and the use of the British army in Northern Ireland strained relations for much of the 20th century. But the success of the peace process has eased tensions and a visit by the monarch is seen by many as cementing a closer relationship. The Sinn Féin president, Gerry Adams, stressed his party was still against the royal visit and would host celebrations of republicanism in each city the Queen visits. He described the tour as premature and insensitive. Anti-war campaigners and left-wing republican group Éirígí, which has one council seat, are planning a series of protests. The start of the visit falls on the anniversary of atrocities which claimed the greatest loss of life in a single day of the Troubles. Thirty-four men, women and children, including an unborn baby, were killed in no-warning explosions in Dublin and Monaghan on 17 May 1974. The victims’ families and survivors of a series of bombs have written an open letter to the Queen to mark her arrival in Ireland and will hold their annual wreath-laying ceremony a few hundred metres from where the Queen will commemorate Irish rebels in the Garden of Remembrance. Justice for the Forgotten has appealed to the monarch to urge Cameron to open secret files which were withheld by the British government during an inquiry. Ireland The Queen Global terrorism UK security and terrorism Monarchy Europe Adam Gabbatt Henry McDonald guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Don Lemon Comes Out: CNN Anchor Reveals He's Gay In New Book CNN Anchor: I’m Gay . Like. 5K. TV Squad: ABC Cancels ‘Brothers & Sisters,’ ‘V,’ ‘Off the Map,’ ‘No Ordinary Family’ & More, Renews ‘Happy Endings,’ ‘Body of Proof’. Like. 4K. Moviefone Blog: Moviefone Mash: Wedding Mishaps (VIDEO) … CNN Anchor: I'm Gay – ArticlesInbox CNN anchor Don Lemon has come out. In a new book, ‘Transparent,’ Lemon talks about his life and his sexuality, and he revealed that he is gay in an interview… Cali Swag District's M-Bone Dead: “Teach Me How To Dougie” Rapper … WoW!! CNN Anchor: I’m Gay . CNN anchor Don Lemon has come out. In a new book, “Transparent,” Lemon talks about his life and his sexuality,… [more]. WoW!! CNN Anchor: I’m Gay . Chelsea Handler Admits She Dated 50 Cent … Keith Boykin: Thank You, Don Lemon MOST DISCUSSED RIGHT NOW. 2RgnQXLokElFimSGDV8i8a43pip0bdKP iJKomeBLqmM3QvAVQ0trgKQA9zRBn5c9. 1 of 2. CNN Anchor: I’m Gay · Media Matters Calls On Orbitz To Stop Advertising On Fox Over LGBT Issues. HOT ON FACEBOOK … WoW!! CNN Anchor: I'm Gay « The Jamking Show CNN Anchor: I’m Gay . CNN anchor Don Lemon has come out. In a new book, “Transparent,” Lemon talks about his life and his sexuality, and he revealed that he is gay in an interview with the New York Times. In a tweet on Sunday night, … simply_raven says: CNN Anchor: I'm Gay http://pulsene.ws/1D4HZ #thankyouforhonesty
Continue reading …enlarge Henry Morgenthau and his former boss. Real-estate lobbies were wreaking havoc then too. Click here to view this media On this day in 1946 if you were listening to the radio you would probably be hearing an address by former Treasury Secretary under FDR Henry Morgenthau on the state of housing in Post-War America and where the returning Veteran stood in all of it. Then as now, Real Estate prices were grossly inflated and there seemed to be little in the way of a remedy for it. Measures were introduced such as the Veteran’s Emergency Housing Bill to provide a ceiling for prices in an attempt to curb runaway prices. But, as always, lobbies in Washington were powerful and belligerent and the crisis only deepened. Henry Morgenthau: “Wyatt’s (Wilson Wyatt, author of Veteran’s Emergency House Bill) proposal was simply this; suppose a man owns a house, he would be permitted to sell it once at any price he could get for it. But if the house is again put up for sale after that, that same price would be considered the ceiling so long as the emergency lasts. In other words, if he got $10,000 dollars for the house, $10,000 would thereafter be considered the ceiling price. This would have done nothing, of course to roll the real estate prices back from their present dangerously inflated levels. Mr. Wyatt was just trying to work out a compromise. But the Real Estate lobbies wouldn’t hold still, even for that. They know perfectly well that millions of dollars of Black Market money, a lot of it in the form of $1,000 bills is being poured into real estate speculation. Evidently they are unwilling to put an end to it. As far as the Real Estate lobbies are concerned, Real Estate prices can go on rising till kingdom come. Even if the average American and the Veteran are reduced to living in cellers.” In trying to remedy a situation that had spiraled out of control, Morgenthau, on behalf of the Truman administration sought to ease the anxieties and express some sort of solution to the problem. This radio address, given on May 16th 1946 was part of a weekly series of addresses Morgenthau gave on Post-War problems. . . .and I left in the Gallo Wine commercial as a reminder.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Steve Benen summed up this statement from Mitch McConnell yesterday on CNN’s State of the Union — McConnell thinks midterms settled tax debate : The Republican line on taxes isn’t exactly a mystery: shrinking the deficit is important, but not as important as making sure there are no tax increases on anyone at any time by any amount. That tax cuts are the driving factor behind the massive budget shortfalls over the next decade (and beyond) is apparently unimportant. How do GOP leaders defend this? Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) tried out this line on CNN’s “State of the Union” yesterday. CROWLEY: And I think I can get a yes or no from you on this. No tax increases will you accept at all in either the short, the medium or the long term, and that includes close tax loopholes? MCCONNELL: Well, there aren’t going to be any tax increases. You know, that was settled by last November’s election. The president knows that. I’m trying to think of a dumber line on fiscal policy. Nothing comes to mind. The usual Republican position — tax increases necessarily undercut the economy — is absurd enough. But McConnell didn’t even rely on the old canard, choosing instead to make an electoral/policy argument. Americans elected a Democratic president, a Democratic Senate, and a Republican House. Ergo, any and all tax increases are off the table. Read on… These guys really are a broken record on the tax issue. What’s disgusting is they’re willing to destroy the country’s economy with their rigid ideology, no matter what their constituents think.
Continue reading …Experts film previously unknown group on hidden cameras – but loss of habitat and threat from poachers cloud newfound hope Deep in the jungle, armed forest rangers trek through the palms on a mission to confirm some rare good news: the discovery of a wild tiger population in an area of Thap Lan national park previously written off by wildlife experts. Working with foreign conservationists, the rangers have been gathering evidence from camera traps over the past two years that suggests this single national park in Thailand may have more tigers than China. Thap Lan, with its spectacular forests of saw-bladed plan palms, is an oasis of biodiversity amid expanding human development. Elephants, clouded leopards, spotted linsang, boar and deer thrive below the canopy, which is filled with the song of myna, lapwings, laughing thrushes and other exotic birds. Locals have long insisted that tigers also prowl in this area. Camera traps, triggered by heat and movement, have been left strapped to trees for a month. Some have been destroyed by wild elephants or infested by nesting ants, but the memory cards inside have yielded a trove of images of bears, leopards, itinerant monks, as well as tigers and – worryingly – armed poachers. More than half the park has still to be checked, but rangers have already confirmed eight tigers. This is not yet enough to be classified as a sustainable population, but park managers are optimistic more animals will be found. “I’m very happy as this is beyond expectations,” said Thap Lan’s superintendent, Taywin Meesat. “There are areas deeper inside where we haven’t placed camera traps yet. Given the results so far, there could be 20 to 50 tigers here.” The conservation group that provided much of the training and equipment for the operation said the results showed a gap in understanding and the need to invest more in research and protection. Tim Redford of Freedland, a Bangkok-based group that helps rangers in south-east Asia, said: “This place was supposed to be devoid of tigers. But we did a course here and were surprised to find signs of tigers. The more we looked, the more we found. That led me to believe the forest must have tigers throughout and there is a big gap in our knowledge of where they live.” He called for further studies across countries where other small populations may have been missed. The difficulty of measuring tiger numbers was evident when India increased its estimate by 10% compared with a survey in 2008. The discovery comes amid a fresh global push to reverse a precipitous decline in the numbers of wild tigers, down 97% compared with a century ago. At the St Petersburg tiger summit last year, participants, including the World Bank, NGOs and range states, pledged $329m (£200m) to help double the predators’ numbers in the wild from the current level of about 3,200. But the new hope in Thap Lan is mixed with old fears. Thailand is thought to be home to between 250 and 300 wild tigers, but they are vulnerable. The biggest threat is a loss of habitat. Although nominally protected, Thailand’s national parks are being encroached upon by human development, particularly monoculture plantations, roads and second homes for Bangkok’s rich. Many locals also subsidise their incomes by poaching and illegally logging aloe and tropical hardwood. Park managers and police are worried that poachers and illegal traders would target the tigers once news gets out about their numbers in the area. Rangers mount night patrols and public education campaigns to halt these activities. It can be dangerous work. A Thap Lan ranger was killed in a gun battle with poachers three years ago. In Cambodia, forest protectors have been murdered in hand grenade attacks. The stakes are high. According to conservationists and police, poachers are paid 7,000 to 15,000 baht – £150 to £300 – per kg for a tiger carcass. Middlemen then sell the animals on for about 10 times that amount, mostly to customers in China and Vietnam, where the animal’s bones and penis are used in tonics and aphrodisiacs. Yet penalties for wildlife offences remain absurdly low, with fines ranging from 500 to 40,000 baht. Thailand has much to protect. The country is home to some of the most biodiverse tropical forests in south-east Asia. Just two hours from Bangkok, the Guardian’s car almost ran over a King Cobra, which expressed its indignation by rearing up angrily and flickering its tongue. Despite this ecological wealth, wildlife crime was a low priority for law enforcement authorities for many years. But there are signs that attitudes may be changing. Thai customs officials have made several high-profile arrests in the past two years, including that of a woman who attempted to smuggle a live baby tiger cub through Bangkok airport in a case full of stuffed animal toys. A sting operation last week apprehended a United Arab Emirates citizen whose belongings concealed two leopards, two panthers, an Asiatic black bear and two macaque monkeys . More impressive still was an undercover operation by the Thai police this year that exposed a large tiger-trading syndicate. Its ringleader, a woman known as “J”, remains at large, partly because her husband is a police officer, but investigators said they were closing in. “I believe she may have been selling 100 tigers per year for 10 years,” said Colonel Kittipong Khawsamang, deputy head of the wildlife crime division as he leafed through police photographs of tiger carcasses kept on ice. “We know she is a big trader and have been collecting evidence, but we don’t yet have enough for a prosecution.” Khawsamang said recent raids have shown Thailand has become a hub of the tiger trade, due to its location between other range nations in south-east Asia and China, the main market. The business is also supplied by Thailand’s many tiger farms, some of which claim to operate as zoos while covertly breeding animals for sale. The most notorious is the Sri Racha zoo near Pattaya, which police have raided on several occasions, confiscating hundreds of animals. Tourists still flock to watch the farm-bred tigers jump through flaming hoops, suckle at pigs and walk around on their hind legs to the music of the Can-Can and laughter from the audience. Police and conservationists believe “zoos” encourage poaching both as a source of breeding stock and by sustaining the market for tiger products. General Misakawan Buara, commander of Thailand’s natural resources and environmental crime division, said: “The problem is, we can only check permits and the inventory, but we can’t check which tigers and going in and out because we are police, not animal experts. We need more DNA checks, implanted chips or a tagging system so we can verify the origins of tigers.”That – like training and equipping rangers – is not cheap. But little of the money pledged at St Petersberg summit is evident yet at the grass roots, where the budgets for rangers and wildlife police are unchanged “Tiger conservation at the top and the bottom are two different worlds. The people who are high paid researchers and biologists jet-set around the world,” said Freeland’s Redford. “The rangers are paid almost nothing. They get $50 to $200 a month to go out and face armed poachers. We need to give them every support we can if we expect to keep tigers into the future. “There is not a shortage of money, we just have to get it focused in the right places.” Tiger number There are believed to be about 3,200 tigers left in the wild and more than 13,000 in captivity – half
Continue reading …Experts film previously unknown group on hidden cameras – but loss of habitat and threat from poachers cloud newfound hope Deep in the jungle, armed forest rangers trek through the palms on a mission to confirm some rare good news: the discovery of a wild tiger population in an area of Thap Lan national park previously written off by wildlife experts. Working with foreign conservationists, the rangers have been gathering evidence from camera traps over the past two years that suggests this single national park in Thailand may have more tigers than China. Thap Lan, with its spectacular forests of saw-bladed plan palms, is an oasis of biodiversity amid expanding human development. Elephants, clouded leopards, spotted linsang, boar and deer thrive below the canopy, which is filled with the song of myna, lapwings, laughing thrushes and other exotic birds. Locals have long insisted that tigers also prowl in this area. Camera traps, triggered by heat and movement, have been left strapped to trees for a month. Some have been destroyed by wild elephants or infested by nesting ants, but the memory cards inside have yielded a trove of images of bears, leopards, itinerant monks, as well as tigers and – worryingly – armed poachers. More than half the park has still to be checked, but rangers have already confirmed eight tigers. This is not yet enough to be classified as a sustainable population, but park managers are optimistic more animals will be found. “I’m very happy as this is beyond expectations,” said Thap Lan’s superintendent, Taywin Meesat. “There are areas deeper inside where we haven’t placed camera traps yet. Given the results so far, there could be 20 to 50 tigers here.” The conservation group that provided much of the training and equipment for the operation said the results showed a gap in understanding and the need to invest more in research and protection. Tim Redford of Freedland, a Bangkok-based group that helps rangers in south-east Asia, said: “This place was supposed to be devoid of tigers. But we did a course here and were surprised to find signs of tigers. The more we looked, the more we found. That led me to believe the forest must have tigers throughout and there is a big gap in our knowledge of where they live.” He called for further studies across countries where other small populations may have been missed. The difficulty of measuring tiger numbers was evident when India increased its estimate by 10% compared with a survey in 2008. The discovery comes amid a fresh global push to reverse a precipitous decline in the numbers of wild tigers, down 97% compared with a century ago. At the St Petersburg tiger summit last year, participants, including the World Bank, NGOs and range states, pledged $329m (£200m) to help double the predators’ numbers in the wild from the current level of about 3,200. But the new hope in Thap Lan is mixed with old fears. Thailand is thought to be home to between 250 and 300 wild tigers, but they are vulnerable. The biggest threat is a loss of habitat. Although nominally protected, Thailand’s national parks are being encroached upon by human development, particularly monoculture plantations, roads and second homes for Bangkok’s rich. Many locals also subsidise their incomes by poaching and illegally logging aloe and tropical hardwood. Park managers and police are worried that poachers and illegal traders would target the tigers once news gets out about their numbers in the area. Rangers mount night patrols and public education campaigns to halt these activities. It can be dangerous work. A Thap Lan ranger was killed in a gun battle with poachers three years ago. In Cambodia, forest protectors have been murdered in hand grenade attacks. The stakes are high. According to conservationists and police, poachers are paid 7,000 to 15,000 baht – £150 to £300 – per kg for a tiger carcass. Middlemen then sell the animals on for about 10 times that amount, mostly to customers in China and Vietnam, where the animal’s bones and penis are used in tonics and aphrodisiacs. Yet penalties for wildlife offences remain absurdly low, with fines ranging from 500 to 40,000 baht. Thailand has much to protect. The country is home to some of the most biodiverse tropical forests in south-east Asia. Just two hours from Bangkok, the Guardian’s car almost ran over a King Cobra, which expressed its indignation by rearing up angrily and flickering its tongue. Despite this ecological wealth, wildlife crime was a low priority for law enforcement authorities for many years. But there are signs that attitudes may be changing. Thai customs officials have made several high-profile arrests in the past two years, including that of a woman who attempted to smuggle a live baby tiger cub through Bangkok airport in a case full of stuffed animal toys. A sting operation last week apprehended a United Arab Emirates citizen whose belongings concealed two leopards, two panthers, an Asiatic black bear and two macaque monkeys . More impressive still was an undercover operation by the Thai police this year that exposed a large tiger-trading syndicate. Its ringleader, a woman known as “J”, remains at large, partly because her husband is a police officer, but investigators said they were closing in. “I believe she may have been selling 100 tigers per year for 10 years,” said Colonel Kittipong Khawsamang, deputy head of the wildlife crime division as he leafed through police photographs of tiger carcasses kept on ice. “We know she is a big trader and have been collecting evidence, but we don’t yet have enough for a prosecution.” Khawsamang said recent raids have shown Thailand has become a hub of the tiger trade, due to its location between other range nations in south-east Asia and China, the main market. The business is also supplied by Thailand’s many tiger farms, some of which claim to operate as zoos while covertly breeding animals for sale. The most notorious is the Sri Racha zoo near Pattaya, which police have raided on several occasions, confiscating hundreds of animals. Tourists still flock to watch the farm-bred tigers jump through flaming hoops, suckle at pigs and walk around on their hind legs to the music of the Can-Can and laughter from the audience. Police and conservationists believe “zoos” encourage poaching both as a source of breeding stock and by sustaining the market for tiger products. General Misakawan Buara, commander of Thailand’s natural resources and environmental crime division, said: “The problem is, we can only check permits and the inventory, but we can’t check which tigers and going in and out because we are police, not animal experts. We need more DNA checks, implanted chips or a tagging system so we can verify the origins of tigers.”That – like training and equipping rangers – is not cheap. But little of the money pledged at St Petersberg summit is evident yet at the grass roots, where the budgets for rangers and wildlife police are unchanged “Tiger conservation at the top and the bottom are two different worlds. The people who are high paid researchers and biologists jet-set around the world,” said Freeland’s Redford. “The rangers are paid almost nothing. They get $50 to $200 a month to go out and face armed poachers. We need to give them every support we can if we expect to keep tigers into the future. “There is not a shortage of money, we just have to get it focused in the right places.” Tiger number There are believed to be about 3,200 tigers left in the wild and more than 13,000 in captivity – half
Continue reading …‘Threat to one is a threat to all’ treaty cited in White House report – but open net versus privacy analysis omits WikiLeaks The US has given the broadest hint yet that a cyber-attack on one Nato country will be regarded as an attack on all. It is a potentially dangerous development, as cyber-attacks are increasingly common, with the Pentagon reporting millions of probes a day and actions by more than 100 foreign intelligence agencies. In 2007, Estonia was almost crippled by a cyber-attack thought to originate in Russia. At the time, Estonia, a member of Nato, said it did not know if the alliance covered cyber-attacks, and the US, Britain and others danced round the issue. The development is contained in a report by the Obama administration, International Strategy for Cyberspace, in which the US for the first time sets out a strategy for dealing with the expansion of the internet and what it describes as “arbitrary and malicious disruption”. It notes the growing threats by individual hackers, companies and hostile states, and offers broad proposals on how to tackle these. It suggests that existing US treaties such as the one that set up Nato, which requires an attack on one member state to be treated as an attack on all, also cover cyber-attacks. But it stops short of saying so categorically. “All states possess an inherent right to self-defence, and we recognise that certain hostile acts conducted through cyberspace could compel actions under the commitments we have with our military treaty partners,” it says. The thrust of the report is on how to reconcile the US championing of internet freedom in places such as China and Iran with protection of privacy in the US. The report is thin on how to achieve this. The Obama administration sets out a broad objective: “The US will work internationally to promote an open, inter-operable, secure, and reliable information and communications infrastructure that supports international trade and commerce, strengthens international security, and fosters free expression and innovation.” But the report continues: “The world must collectively recognise the challenges posed by malevolent actors’ entry into cyberspace, and update and strengthen our national and international policies accordingly. Activities undertaken in cyberspace have consequences for our lives in physical space, and we must work towards building the rule of law, to prevent the risks of logging on from outweighing its benefits.” At present, international law largely does not cover the internet, nor do international treaties. But WikiLeaks, though responsible for the biggest security breach in US history, is not mentioned and was not raised by any of the speakers at the launch of the report, including secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Instead, she spoke of a need for consensus: “There is no one-size-fits-all, straightforward route to this goal. We have to build a global consensus about a shared vision for cyberspace.” But what Clinton, who has underscored the centrality of internet freedom to US foreign policy, did highlight was the internet’s role in grassroots mobilisation and attempts by governments to stop this: “While the internet offers new ways for people to exercise their political rights, it also, as we have seen very clearly in the last months, gives governments new tools for clamping down on dissent.” Commerce secretary, Gary Locke, nominated as next US ambassador to China, said he intended to keep pressing “to advance these goals and the broader set of cyberspace issues with our Chinese counterparts”. WikiLeaks was able to obtain a quarter of a million secret US state department files last year, published in the Guardian and other papers. Such a breach would not have been possible without the internet. The report wants states to work together to give better protection. “When cybersecurity incidents demand government action, officials can detect those threats early and share data in real-time to mitigate the spread of malware or minimise the impact of a major disruption – all while preserving the broader free flow of information. When a crime is committed internationally, law enforcement agencies are able to collaborate to safeguard and share evidence and bring individuals to justice,” the report says. While condemning cyber-attacks, at the same time the US, along with Israel, is widely believed to have been responsible for the Stuxnet virus that Iran claims disrupted its nuclear programme. The administration last week sent proposals to Congress to put pressure on companies to improve security. The US funds schemes to develop new technologies and train activists to evade government controls. But activists accuse it of hypocrisy for insisting the internet must also have “rule of law”: a signal that unauthorised breaches such as WikiLeaks will not be tolerated. Internet United States Nato US politics Hillary Clinton Obama administration WikiLeaks Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …‘Threat to one is a threat to all’ treaty cited in White House report – but open net versus privacy analysis omits WikiLeaks The US has given the broadest hint yet that a cyber-attack on one Nato country will be regarded as an attack on all. It is a potentially dangerous development, as cyber-attacks are increasingly common, with the Pentagon reporting millions of probes a day and actions by more than 100 foreign intelligence agencies. In 2007, Estonia was almost crippled by a cyber-attack thought to originate in Russia. At the time, Estonia, a member of Nato, said it did not know if the alliance covered cyber-attacks, and the US, Britain and others danced round the issue. The development is contained in a report by the Obama administration, International Strategy for Cyberspace, in which the US for the first time sets out a strategy for dealing with the expansion of the internet and what it describes as “arbitrary and malicious disruption”. It notes the growing threats by individual hackers, companies and hostile states, and offers broad proposals on how to tackle these. It suggests that existing US treaties such as the one that set up Nato, which requires an attack on one member state to be treated as an attack on all, also cover cyber-attacks. But it stops short of saying so categorically. “All states possess an inherent right to self-defence, and we recognise that certain hostile acts conducted through cyberspace could compel actions under the commitments we have with our military treaty partners,” it says. The thrust of the report is on how to reconcile the US championing of internet freedom in places such as China and Iran with protection of privacy in the US. The report is thin on how to achieve this. The Obama administration sets out a broad objective: “The US will work internationally to promote an open, inter-operable, secure, and reliable information and communications infrastructure that supports international trade and commerce, strengthens international security, and fosters free expression and innovation.” But the report continues: “The world must collectively recognise the challenges posed by malevolent actors’ entry into cyberspace, and update and strengthen our national and international policies accordingly. Activities undertaken in cyberspace have consequences for our lives in physical space, and we must work towards building the rule of law, to prevent the risks of logging on from outweighing its benefits.” At present, international law largely does not cover the internet, nor do international treaties. But WikiLeaks, though responsible for the biggest security breach in US history, is not mentioned and was not raised by any of the speakers at the launch of the report, including secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Instead, she spoke of a need for consensus: “There is no one-size-fits-all, straightforward route to this goal. We have to build a global consensus about a shared vision for cyberspace.” But what Clinton, who has underscored the centrality of internet freedom to US foreign policy, did highlight was the internet’s role in grassroots mobilisation and attempts by governments to stop this: “While the internet offers new ways for people to exercise their political rights, it also, as we have seen very clearly in the last months, gives governments new tools for clamping down on dissent.” Commerce secretary, Gary Locke, nominated as next US ambassador to China, said he intended to keep pressing “to advance these goals and the broader set of cyberspace issues with our Chinese counterparts”. WikiLeaks was able to obtain a quarter of a million secret US state department files last year, published in the Guardian and other papers. Such a breach would not have been possible without the internet. The report wants states to work together to give better protection. “When cybersecurity incidents demand government action, officials can detect those threats early and share data in real-time to mitigate the spread of malware or minimise the impact of a major disruption – all while preserving the broader free flow of information. When a crime is committed internationally, law enforcement agencies are able to collaborate to safeguard and share evidence and bring individuals to justice,” the report says. While condemning cyber-attacks, at the same time the US, along with Israel, is widely believed to have been responsible for the Stuxnet virus that Iran claims disrupted its nuclear programme. The administration last week sent proposals to Congress to put pressure on companies to improve security. The US funds schemes to develop new technologies and train activists to evade government controls. But activists accuse it of hypocrisy for insisting the internet must also have “rule of law”: a signal that unauthorised breaches such as WikiLeaks will not be tolerated. Internet United States Nato US politics Hillary Clinton Obama administration WikiLeaks Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …