Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 419)
Phone hacking: police warn Mail journalists of voicemail interceptions

Mail on Sunday and Daily Mail may have been targeted by News of the World investigator Glenn Mulcaire Six journalists who worked for the Mail on Sunday and its sister title the Daily Mail are set to be shown evidence by Scotland Yard which suggests their voicemail messages were intercepted by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who worked at the News of the World. The fact that journalists from rival titles, several of whom are still employed by the Mail titles’ owner Associated Newspapers, are being warned by the Met they were being targeted by Mulcaire signals that Operation Weeting, the Met’s phone hacking investigation which began in January, is about to enter a dramatic phase. It follows news that Dennis Rice, a Fleet Street veteran who works for the Mail on Sunday as a freelance, is suing the News of the World’s owner News Group for alleged breach of privacy, joining public figures who have already launched civil actions action against the title at the high court. The four remaining Mail on Sunday journalists also have separate appointments scheduled with the Met, along with a Daily Mail reporter. The Guardian understands that several of them are preparing to follow Rice’s example by bringing their own legal proceedings against News Group. The latest development could threaten the uneasy Fleet Street alliance between tabloid titles, which have been slow to report revelations about the true extent of phone hacking because they fear it will damage public perception of their trade. Rival titles are also reluctant to cover the story because the majority have also used private investigators in the past. A 2007 report by the information commissioner titled, What Price Privacy, found that the Daily Mail commissioned another private investigator, Steve Whittamore, on more occasions than any other newspaper. The same report found that 31 titles used Whittamore, including the Guardian’s sister title the Observer, which is also published by Guardian Media Group. Rice, who was investigations editor at the Mail on Sunday in 2005 and 2006, is thought to have been shocked by the evidence he was shown by the Met prior to launching his action. It is believed to include recordings Mulcaire made of messages left on Rice’s mobile phone, including several from friends and families. News Group has conceded that Mulcaire was acting on the instructions of News of the World journalists in some cases, but it is contesting other claims. It is understood that detectives warned the Mail on Sunday’s owner Associated Newspapers in 2006 to improve its security systems. The fact that a group of journalists at the Mail titles are apparently intent on discovering whether they were hacked by Mulcaire makes it more likely that the tactics employed by sections of Fleet Street in their search for stories will be exposed. Journalists frequently attempted to land exclusives by using underhand methods, including trying to access news lists held by competitors. But it now appears that some of them may have been habitually hacking into one another’s voicemail message in the hope of obtaining stories, leads and contacts. The original police inquiry, which led to Mulcaire being jailed in 2007, also discovered evidence that he has successfully intercepted voicemail messages belonging to Rebekah Brooks, who was editor of the Sun when Mulcaire was working exclusively for its Sunday stablemate. The current investigation is believed to have found evidence that another former Sun editor, Kelvin Mackenzie, also had his phone hacked. News International declined to comment. Phone hacking Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Mail on Sunday Associated Newspapers Daily Mail & General Trust News of the World James Robinson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ratko Mladic ruled fit for extradition to face Bosnia war crimes tribunal

Defence insists Bosnian Serb general is ill but court approves transfer to The Hague and officials say he is in robust form Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb general charged with orchestrating the murder of tens of thousands of Balkan Muslims, has been ruled fit for extradition to face international justice after the capture that ended his 16 years as a fugitive. Brought before a special Belgrade court a day after being arrested in a dawn raid on a country cottage north-east of the Serbian capital, Mladic dismissed the 15 counts of genocide and war crimes against him, while his lawyer and family insisted he was too ill to be extradited for trial at the UN war crimes tribunal in the Hague. They asked for him to be hospitalised in Belgrade and treated by a team of Russian doctors. Following a medical examination, however, the Belgrade judge ruled that the 69-year-old was fit to be transferred to the Yugoslav tribunal in The Hague. The judge gave Mladic three days to appeal. Bruno Vekaric, a Serbian war crimes prosecutor, said the extradition could be completed within a week. A panel of judges is expected to hear the appeal on Monday before the Serbian justice minister decides whether to put Mladic on a flight to the Netherlands. Doctors, family, lawyers and a Serbian government minister went on Friday to the detention unit where Mladic. They talked to the genocide suspect, who is said to have been in robust form when questioned on Thursday. Brusquely rejecting the charges against him, he turned on Vekaric, made rude remarks about his beard and refused to sign a statement. Mladic was put on suicide watch and had medicines and his spectacles taken away. “Are you frightened I’m going to kill myself? Mladic won’t do Mladic,” he told his guards, according to the Belgrade newspaper Blic quoting court sources. His son, Darko Mladic, said after visiting the suspect twice on Friday: “His stand is that he’s not guilty of what he’s being accused of. “He has received a medical examination and is under medical observation, but we think that’s not enough because of his condition. From what we saw his state of health is worrying. We are demanding that he be transferred to hospital and we want a team of doctors from Russia.” His son added that the doctors had evidence of two strokes. The court spokesman, Maja Kovacevic, agreed Mladic was ill but said he was capable of understanding the proceedings and was fit to go to The Hague, where medical treatment would be available. As details began to emerge of the operation to seize Mladic, questions were being asked about why the Serbian authorities, under intense international pressure, had taken so long to locate him. Ivica Dacic, the Serbian interior minister, said Mladic had been living for years in the small Vojvodina village of Lazarevo, north-east of Belgrade. Dacic said that when a special police unit seized Mladic early on Thursday and asked him to identify himself, he replied: “Congratulations, you’ve found who you are looking for.” On Friday in the Serbian half of Bosnia, protests at the arrest began to multiply. Posters of Mladic with the slogan “Serbs arise” appeared across Banja Luka, the Bosnian Serb capital, and demonstrations were announced in Pale and Han Pijesak, the wartime political and military headquarters of Mladic and Radovan Karadzic, also being tried on genocide charges. The Mladic arrest is seen as a coup for Serbia’s President Boris Tadic, who pressed the European Union to reward him by naming a date for starting talks on Serbia’s membership. But in what is seen as a missed opportunity, Tadic is boycotting a summit of east European leaders with Barack Obama because the president of Kosovo, which Belgrade refuses to recognise as independent, will be there. Ratko Mladic Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina War crimes Europe United Nations Ian Traynor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
G8 summit: Gaddafi isolated as Russia joins demand for Libyan leader to go

Nations united over Libya as Cameron says pressure on Libyan regime beginning to tell – but rift remains over Syria Colonel Gaddafi has beenleft diplomatically deserted after Russia, his sole international interlocutor joined the rest of the G8 rich nations in declaring the Libyan leader had lost all legitimacy and had to go. But continuing differences between Russia and the west prevented agreement on how to pressurise the Syrian regime to end its oppression; a planned reference to take the issue to the UN security council was removed from the G8 communique. On Libya, David Cameron claimed there would be no attempt to reach a compromise deal saying the only message to the Libyan leader was that he had to give up power. Cameron, who held a council of war with Barack Obama and Nicholas Sarkozy on Thursday night, claimed the war against Gaddafi was entering a second phase and the pressure on the regime was beginning to tell. There had been suggestions the Russians would act as some kind of mediator in trying to secure a peace deal with Gaddafi, but Cameron said the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, had not made this suggestion in the discussions he had had with them. Cameron said: “The most important thing is to send the same message down the pipe when one of these offers appears and the message is that Gaddafi has to go. All sorts of things can happen after that. All offers of mediation should be met with that pretty clear response.” He said the Tripoli regime was beginning to feel the heat, revealing: “There is a whole string of contacts taking place, of phone calls and faxes coming out saying ‘how do we get out of this, what do we about this?’ to which I say there is one clear response: Gaddafi has to go.” Sarkozy revealed he had been discussing a joint visit with Cameron to the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, but Cameron’s aides played down the prospect of an imminent trip. Sarkozy also highlighted the terms of the communique saying: “There is unanimous support for this objective and the terms used against Gaddafi are particularly clear and hard and accepted by all the G8 countries including Russia.” In unusually simple language for a G8 communique, the leaders of the industrialised west said: “Gaddafi and the Libyan government have failed to fulfil their responsibility to protect the Libyan population and have lost all legitimacy. He has no future in a free, democratic Libya. He must go. “We welcome the work of the international criminal court in investigating crimes in Libya and note the chief prosecutor’s request on 16 May for three arrest warrants.” The Russians said they would send a delegation to Benghazi, but would not accept Gaddafi into exile. The communique was less clear, Cameron conceded, on Syria, admitting that the Arab world was divided as to whether President Assad might yet take the fork in the road towards reconciliation. Sarkozy was more blunt: “The situation is perfectly unacceptable and the attitude of the powers in the country is shocking. We have done everything we can to bring Syria into the international community. We have tried to help, to advise, to understand … sadly the leaders are going firmly backwards and we have withdrawn our confidence and criticised what has to be criticised.” The shift in the communique language to a vaguer threat of “further measures” appeared to be driven by Russia, which has a security council veto and has been upset by the way in which the west has interpreted its right to bomb Gaddafi following an earlier UN resolution giving Nato all necessary powers to protect civilians. “There are no grounds to consider this issue [Syria] in the UN security council,” Russia’s deputy foreign minister, Sergei Ryabkov, told reporters. He said a draft resolution circulated to the 15-nation council on Wednesday by Britain, France, Germany and Portugal was “untimely and damaging”, adding: “We will not even read the text.” The draft resolution could also face a Chinese veto. The language on Libya by contrast at the G8 will be seen as a victory for Sarkozy, suggesting he managed to persuade a reluctant Russian delegation to bury their doubts about the scale of the military offensive, including the decision by the French and British to provide ground attack helicopters for use by Nato. In other parts of the communique the language on Libya is less robust, stating: “We are committed to supporting a political transition that reflects the will of the Libyan people. We recall our strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and national unity of Libya.” Elsewhere in the communique, the leaders of the biggest industrialised countries also claim “the world economy is recovering”, even if more needs to be done to reduce global imbalances and deficits. G8 Muammar Gaddafi Libya Syria France Middle East Dmitry Medvedev Africa Foreign policy David Cameron Nato Europe Patrick Wintour Kim Willsher guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
The Jobs Gap: The Deficit That Matters Most

enlarge Credit: Washington Post While all eyes remain fixed on the Republican debt ceiling hostage drama in Washington, the deficit that really matters has all but disappeared from the American political debate. Even as Vice President Biden confidently predicted his bipartisan group of budget negotiators would slash $1 trillion in spending , forecasters are once again downgrading their estimates for second quarter economic growth . All of which means that with 9% unemployment and record-low labor force participation, the jobs deficit should be job number one for both political parties . With first-time jobless claims edging back up and first quarter growth lowered to 1.8% , Macroeconomic Advisors dropping their Q2 GDP growth forecast from 3.2% to 2.8%. That prompted Paul Krugman was quick to join Brad Delong in sounding the alarm. It’s “time to panic,” Delong warned, adding that real second quarter GDP growth “looks slow enough to put no upward pressure at all on the employment-to-population ratio.” Krugman, who ominously cautioned last year about “Third Depression” in the form of prolonged economic weakness, lamented that: As Brad says, these estimates now suggest that we have now gone through a year and a half of “recovery” that has failed to make any progress toward closing the gap between what the economy should be producing and what it’s actually producing. That output gap, the Washington Post showed using a helpful interactive graphic last fall, explains “why it doesn’t feel like a recovery.” While U.S. GDP has now surpassed its pre-Bush recession level , the $900 billion divide between the amount the United States can produce and what it is actually producing “explains why we feel so miserable more than a year into what is technically classified as an economic recovery.” Worse still, as the Post charted at the time, at current rates of population and productivity growth, the economy would have to expand at an average of 3% a year to reduce unemployment to 5% by 2020 . Right now, that’s just not happening. While the recession officially ended in 2009, the current recovery is proceeding at a much more sluggish rate than usual. The result, as the thoroughly depressing chart which follows from the St. Louis Fed shows, is persistent joblessness hovering around 9%. Just as frightening, employment as percentage of U.S. population has nose-dived. (As the New York Times noted earlier this month, “men currently have their lowest labor force participation rate since the Labor Department began keeping track since 1948.” For months, House Speaker John Boehner has insisted that “getting Americans back to work has been and will continue to be the number-one priority for our new majority.” Of course, that promise wasn’t just belied by Boehner’s choices instead to fast-track draconian new anti-abortion legislation or his April declaration that repealing the Obama health care law was “our No. 1 priority.” As the data show, the GOP has successfully transformed Americans’ focus onto another issue altogether: the budget deficit. “Reagan,” Vice President Dick Cheney famously declared in 2002, “proved deficits don’t matter.” Unless, that is, a Democrat is in the White House . After all, while Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and George W. Bush doubled it again , each Republican was rewarded with a second term in office. But as the Gallup polling data show, concern over the federal deficit hasn’t been this high since Democratic budget balancer Bill Clinton was in office. All of which suggest the Republicans’ born-again disdain for deficits ranks among the greatest – and most successful – political double-standards in recent memory. The triumph of the GOP messaging machine is reflected in an April Washington Post/Pew Research poll. In just the four months since the Republican majority took control of the House, the percentage of Americans believing the budget deficit is a major problem which must be addressed now catapulted from 70% to 81%. But even more revealing is an April Gallup survey which showed the deficit (17%) rivaling the unemployment (19%) and the overall state of the economy (26%). And as it turns out, those cyclical swings in budget angst reflect the complete victory of the conservative deficit narrative. The Republicans’ misdirection on debt and deficits is reflecting in myriad other ways as well. Despite having voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush (as well as for the Bush tax cuts the unfunded wars in Iraq and Afghanistan responsible for most of the nation’s debt over the next decade), GOP leaders have bamboozled Americans by a 48% to 35% margin that raising the debt limit would be worse than the cataclysm of a U.S. default . And as the National Journal revealed last week, the shift from jobs to deficits in American political discourse is reflected in media coverage as well: Major U.S. newspapers have increasingly shifted their attention away from coverage of unemployment in recent months while greatly intensifying their focus on the deficit, a National Journal analysis shows. The analysis — based on a measure of how often the words “unemployment” and “deficit” appear in major publications — portrays a dramatically shifting landscape of coverage over the past two years, as the debate over how to fix the federal deficit has risen to prominence and the question of how to handle still-high unemployment has faded from the media’s consciousness… Mentions of unemployment have been dwindling since they spiked to 154 in the month ending August 15, 2010; over the month ending Sunday, there were 63. Deficit mentions, meanwhile, surged up to 261 in the month ending December 15, 2010, when the leaders of President Obama’s deficit commission released their final report. Mentions of the deficit remained higher after the commission’s work wrapped up and as House Republicans and then the White House unveiled dueling proposals. In the month ending Sunday, there were 201 mentions. Writing in the Washington Post last month, Eugene Robinson fretted over “the word most politicians ignore: Jobs.” What is it, he asked, “about the word ‘jobs’ that our nation’s leaders fail to understand?” Sadly, Republicans won’t do anything about jobs and have made sure that Democrats can’t. Despite GOP claims to the contrary, the Obama stimulus worked. (By last June, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the Obama stimulus program had saved or created up to 3.3 million jobs, lowered the unemployment rate by as much as 1.8% and boosted GDP by 4.5%. For his part, former John McCain adviser Mark Zandi in August concluded that the combined federal interventions beginning in the fall of 2008 prevented the Great Recession from becoming Depression 2.0. ) But as Paul Krugman predicted before and Ezra Klein explained after, the underfunding of and overly optimistic unemployment predictions for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act when it was being crafted ensured the perception of failure, thus guaranteeing there would not be a second. So much the simplest way to trim the budget deficit cited by the New York Times’ David Leonhardt : cultivate growth . In March, former Obama administration economic adviser Christina Romer called the lack of action on job creation “shameful.” ‘I frankly don’t understand why policy makers aren’t more worried about the suffering of real families. I think there are tools we have tools…that we can use, and I think it’s shameful that we’re not using them….If I have a complaint about policy these days, it’s that we’re not doing enough. That goes all the way up to the Federal Reserve, [which] could be taking more aggressive action. It goes to the Congress and the Administration – there are fiscal policy actions they could be taking.” Reacting to the latest GDP downgrades and the implication for the American jobs deficit, a panicked Brad Delong suggested what some of those actions might be. It is, he said, “time for pulling more spending from the future forward into the present, and pushing more taxes from the present back into the future.” Writing in the New Yorks Times, David Leonhardt asked, “The economy is wavering; does Washington notice?” Sadly, the answer appears to be no. Unfortunately for the millions of unemployed, Republicans have intimidated Democrats and conned the American people into believing the budget deficit is the only one that matters. (An earlier version of this piece appeared at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …
Andrew Breitbart channels Glenn Beck: Jesse Lee is doing George Soros’ bidding for the White House

Click here to view this media The Fox freakout over the White House’s new rapid-response media team headed by Jesse Lee picked up a head of steam last night on Sean Hannity’s show, when Andrew Breitbart came on and sounded like his nemesis, Glenn Beck, for a bit, as he debated the token liberal, Democratis strategist Steve Murphy. All that was missing was the chalkboard: BREITBART: Jesse Lee was at the forefront of the antiwar blogging movement, a point in time in which the same media that is out there saying that you can’t criticize the president, Barack Obama, were out there saying ‘dissent is patriotic’ and so Jesse was protected by the media . Now he wants to go after Fox News, AM talk radio, Andrew Breitbart, and what he’s doing is adding an extra protective layer to George Soros — all the media that he’s buying, and now Media Matters, which is a — MURPHY: This is the Hannity show, not Beck. BREITBART: This is a $15 million a year operation to try and shut up dissent. This is exactly what they do in totalitarian leftist nations like Venezuela. They try to shut people up. At this point, Murphy thankfully jumped in and pointed out that Breitbart was being absurd — this was a standard political media operation, only with more sophisticated media technology to work with. But Breitbart was intent mainly on smearing Jesse Lee: BREITBART: He’s a hit artist. MURPHY: So are you! Bretibart didn’t really have much of a response to that one. He knew it was true.

Continue reading …

Murray Waas broke a story yesterday about the John Ensign scandal in Reuters which Nicole wrote about here. I’ve been pushing for the media to force Sen. Tom Coburn to explain his actions in the matter, since he was in the middle of the whole thing as some sort of a go-0between. Well, he finally commented after Waas broke some news on Ensign: The Senate Ethics committee report portrayed Ensign as intermediary in negotiating a potential seven figure payment from Ensign to his former campaign treasurer, Cindy Hampton, who he had the affair with, and her husband, Doug Hampton, who was Ensign’s closest friend and administrative assistant. The Senate Ethics committee quoted several people who gave sworn testimony in the case. Coburn said today that they were lying. Regarding the Senate Ethics Committee report’s conclusions , Coburn said: “That’s a totally inaccurate characterization of what happened. What the story you hear is not an accurate reflection of what happened.” Ensign made the comments during an interview for C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers,” which will air Sunday. Coburn told C-SPAN that he never negotiated on Ensign’s behalf, but instead simply passed information along from the Hamptons and their attorney and Ensign. He also said that he was proud of what he had done and would do “exactly” the same thing all over again: “We put two families back together with multiple children — both marriages are stable right now,” Coburn said. “I’m proud of what I did and the way I did it. There’s nothing unethical about what I did.” In fact, the Hamptons have said they are divorcing, and Cyndy Hampton recently filed for bankruptcy. It is unclear why Coburn broke his long silence at this point in time and provided C-SPAN with his most extensive remarks on the entire matter since disclosure of the affair. One likely reason is that instead of the story fading, Coburn’s role might face renewed further press scrutiny if and when the Justice Department reopens its probe of Ensign. Coburn has previously said that he was a witness about his role before the Senate Ethics Committee, but has never commented as to whether he was asked for information by the Justice Department. How exactly did he put two families back together again? Does he believe divorce and bankruptcy is “mending the fences?’ Will the media finally force Coburn to answer publicly for his involvement in this scandal?

Continue reading …
Spanish protesters clash with police over clean-up

Violence breaks out around Barcelona’s Plaça de Catalunya, the first trouble after 12 days of protests Protesters who have camped out in Spanish squares for the past 12 days clashed with police for the first time on Friday after authorities dismantled a camp in the centre of Barcelona. Police and clean-up trucks moved into the Plaça de Catalunya, with about 200 protesters being corralled peacefully in the centre of the square. Protesters were told they were not being evicted and would be allowed back, but municipal workers took away tents, mattresses, tarpaulins, computers and materials used to build the camp. Trouble erupted when thousands of supporters arrived and blocked access roads. Police cleared routes out of the square by using batons, reportedly injuring 99 people and arresting two. Video footage filmed in the square shows bloodied demonstrators being beaten by police. Protesters said police also used pepper spray and rubber bullets. The Catalan regional government said it ordered police into the square only so it could be cleaned. Authorities were reportedly concerned that the camp might be a focus for violence on Saturday night when crowds of people are expected to take to Barcelona’s streets if the city’s football team wins the Champions League final against Manchester United. Demonstrators were allowed into the square after the clean-up and immediately started to rebuild the camp. A peaceful demonstration against the police action has been called for this evening in Barcelona, Madrid and dozens more cities where protesters are camped out in squares. The clean-up came after authorities came under increased pressure from shop owners and local officials to remove the camps throughout Spain, but protesters said they would stay in place until Sunday at the earliest. Spain Europe Protest Giles Tremlett guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
In jail: Zimbabwe police sergeant who dared to use Robert Mugabe’s loo

Alois Mabhunu may face a year in prison for insulting the president after being caught short at trade fair When the call of nature comes, it cannot always be denied. Few have answered it in such an unfortunate fashion as Alois Mabhunu. While on duty at a trade fair the Zimbabwean police sergeant simply could not hold on and allegedly dashed to the nearest toilet – disastrously, as it transpired, a toilet specially reserved for President Robert Mugabe. Mabhunu’s relief was thus shortlived. He was arrested and has languished in jail for two weeks on suspicion of invading the presidential privy. The incident happened at the annual Zimbabwe international trade fair (ZITF) in the western city of Bulawayo, according to local radio station VOP . Under the headline “Never Use Toilet Reserved For President!” VOP’s website reported that Mabhunu was on duty at the ZITF grounds during its official opening by Mugabe and Jean-Louis Ekra, the president of Afreximbank. “Mabhunu, due to the call of nature, rushed to the toilets reserved for Mugabe and his guest Ekra, but was stopped by other officers guarding the toilets,” VOP said. “Under intense pressure from the call of nature, the officer forced his way in and managed to relieve himself. He was arrested the following day on 7 May after a report was made to Mugabe’s security men and to senior police officers in the city.” Mabhunu, a murder detective, is in police detention at barracks on the outskirts of Bulawayo. The legality of the case against him was challenged by Beatrice Mtetwa, one of Zimbabwe’s leading human rights lawyers. “There has to be a law saying the toilet is the president’s, but this was a public one,” she said. “They will have had to issue a proclamation in the government gazette specifying it. I bet they didn’t do that.” Mugabe’s personal space – and reputation as father of the independent nation – are fiercely protected. Several motorists are said to have been assaulted by his security personnel for not giving way to the presidential motorcade. Douglas Mwonzora, a leading member of the Movement for Democratic Change, was standing in court in March waiting for a magistrate to arrive when he looked at a portrait of Mugabe and said: “How are you, father? How is your health?” There was mirth in the courtroom but police subsequently charged Mwonzora with insulting the president, an offence punishable by up to a year in prison. Another man will go on trial next month charged with posting an offensive message on Facebook. Vikas Mavhudzi allegedly wrote on prime minister Morgan Tsvangirai’s “wall”: “What happened in Egypt is sending shockwaves to all dictators around the world. No weapon but unity of purpose. Worth emulating, hey.” Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe Africa David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Former RBS boss’s colleague loses Daily Mail contempt bid

Woman alleged to have had affair with Sir Fred Goodwin fails to persuade high court Daily Mail ‘deliberately flouted’ injunction Lawyers acting for the woman alleged to have had an affair with the former bank boss Sir Fred Goodwin have failed in an attempt to launch contempt of court proceedings against the Daily Mail. The high court declined on Friday to refer the Associated Newspapers title to the attorney general, Dominic Grieve, over an article it published last week. Hugh Tomlinson QC, acting on behalf of the woman involved, accused the Daily Mail of “deliberately flouting” Goodwin’s privacy injunction with a profile of the woman, which they claimed allowed people to identify her easily and therefore breach the court order. The online version of the article was taken down. The woman, an ex-colleague of the former Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive, could now decide to refer the Daily Mail to the attorney general. Handing down judgment at the high court in London, Mr Justice Tugendhat said: “The reason that I decline to make the reference is that, in my judgment, it would not assist the attorney general. “The lady is free to refer the matter to the attorney general herself, and the attorney general is free to act of his own motion. “This case has received extensive coverage in many newspapers and other news media and has been the subject of public judgements.” The article was published last Friday, hours after Mr Justice Tugendhat partially lifted Goodwin’s injunction so that he could be named. However, it banned reporting of details of the alleged relationship and the name of the woman, said to be a former “senior colleague” of Goodwin. Lawyers for the Daily Mail said there had been no “deliberate intention” to flout or frustrate the court order and argued that a report in the newspaper had not breached it. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook Media law Sir Fred Goodwin Banking Royal Bank of Scotland Superinjunctions Privacy & the media Privacy Daily Mail Newspapers National newspapers Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
US-Pakistan relations ‘at turning point’ after killing of Bin Laden, warns Clinton

Islamabad must take decisive steps against terrorism, says secretary of state after meeting President Asif Ali Zardari The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, has said that relations between the US and Pakistan have reached a turning point after the killing of Osama bin Laden and that Pakistan must make “decisive steps” to fight terrorism. Clinton made the remarks on Friday after meeting Pakistan’s civilian and military leaders on a brief trip to Islamabad to repair relations, which have been badly frayed by the US raid on 2 May that killed the al-Qaida leader. The Pakistanis were angry that they had not been told of the raid in advance, while the location of Bin Laden’s hideout, in an army town not far from the capital, raised US suspicions that members of the security services must have known his whereabouts. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, who was also in Pakistan, was blunt. “I think we all realise the challenges under which this relationship now labours,” he told reporters. “We had very candid discussions, the kind of discussion two friends should be able to have at times like this.” Clinton and Mullen are the highest-ranking US representatives to confer with Pakistan’s leaders since the raid, which splintered already fragile support in both countries for the agenda of co-operation that officials of both countries say they want. Part of the meeting between Clinton and President Asif Ali Zardari briefly witnessed by reporters was stiff and awkward, with no smiles among the US delegation. Clinton said relations “had reached a turning point” but she thought Pakistan knew the stakes involved. She said it was “up to the government of Pakistan to take decisive steps in the days ahead” against militants, but did not give any details. Clinton also pointed to the reality facing the United States as it contemplates how to deal with Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nexus for extremism and terrorism in a strategically vital region. The US relies on Pakistan for transit and supply routes for the war in Afghanistan and will need its help if Afghanistan is to broker a peace deal with Taliban militants that can end the war. The country is believed to have influence over several Afghan insurgent commanders. Clinton acknowledged this, saying that “for reconciliation to succeed Pakistan must be part of this process”. The US visit comes a day after a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber detonated a pickup truck loaded with explosives near several government offices in north-west Pakistan, killing at least 32 people. Thursday’s blast was the latest in a series of attacks to hit the country since the Bin Laden raid. Pakistan United States Osama bin Laden al-Qaida Global terrorism guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …