Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 418)
Huckabee: It’s ‘Amazing to Me That Kids Are That Ignorant of Their History’ – So Here’s How I Make it Worse

Click here to view this media No, Huckabee didn’t actually say that, but he may as well have. Mike Huckabee is so concerned with the fact that most American children don’t know enough about their country’s history that he’s ready to step in there and do what he can go fill that gap, by making it worse of course. This isn’t a new story but it’s disgusting to see Van Susteren giving him another plug for this garbage on her show last night. Mike Huckabee Fixes American History : Don’t worry, American youth: Mike Huckabee has fixed American history. No longer will you suffer under what Huckabee calls “the ‘blame America first’ attitude prevalent in today’s teaching.” Late Wednesday, Huckabee announced LearnOurHistory.com , a sort of BMG Music Club for what he calls “unbiased” historical lessons for kids. For around $15 each, the company will send you a new animated tale of American history each month, told through the eyes of a gang of time traveling kids. The first video (available for just $9.95, with a gift bag full of goodies)? “The Reagan Revolution.” Naturally. In this 90-second preview of the video, one sees a tale of an America in 1970s decay, where unemployed muggers in “DISCO” tanktops threatened anyone they could find with knives. Then came a man that could restore hope to the land: Ronald Reagan. Read on… It wasn’t long ago that Huckabee was also promoting David Barton’s dangerous revisionist history at the “Rediscover God In America” conference I posted on here — Huckabee Says He Wants Americans To Be Indoctrinated At Gunpoint by David Barton . I guess someone’s got to make up for Beck eventually leaving the air at Fox. Transcript below the fold. VAN SUSTEREN: All right, well, let me just turn quickly you have a learn our history. It’s a program you have. What is that? HUCKABEE: Greta, you know, if you tell an 8-year-old, Hey, I’d like to teach about American history, they’ll probably say to you, Why don’t you just set my hair on fire? But if you tell an 8-year-old, Hey, would you like to watch some cartoons, they’ll say, Oh, yeah. If the cartoons teach them that America is a good country and teaches them some wonderful things about America’s history, that’s Learn Our History is all about. It’s really a program for kids ages 7 and up to teach them American history in a language and in a format that makes sense to kids. Now, the thing that I find interesting, 91 percent of liberals who were shown the videos said they not only learned something, they would buy them for their kids. What I find interesting is that we’ve got a real serious history deficit in the country. Do you realize that only 25 percent of high school seniors in America surveyed even know that George Washington was the first president? That’s amazing to me that kids are that ignorant of their history of this great country. So Learn Our History is about helping them to learn it beyond the classroom in an entertaining and fun way. And I hope that people will take a look at the videos for their kids at Learnourhistory.com. VAN SUSTEREN: Yeah and it’s probably great for adults, too. I probably could use some refresher myself. Thank you, Governor. HUCKABEE: Thank you, Greta.

Continue reading …
Huckabee: It’s ‘Amazing to Me That Kids Are That Ignorant of Their History’ – So Here’s How I Make it Worse

Click here to view this media No, Huckabee didn’t actually say that, but he may as well have. Mike Huckabee is so concerned with the fact that most American children don’t know enough about their country’s history that he’s ready to step in there and do what he can go fill that gap, by making it worse of course. This isn’t a new story but it’s disgusting to see Van Susteren giving him another plug for this garbage on her show last night. Mike Huckabee Fixes American History : Don’t worry, American youth: Mike Huckabee has fixed American history. No longer will you suffer under what Huckabee calls “the ‘blame America first’ attitude prevalent in today’s teaching.” Late Wednesday, Huckabee announced LearnOurHistory.com , a sort of BMG Music Club for what he calls “unbiased” historical lessons for kids. For around $15 each, the company will send you a new animated tale of American history each month, told through the eyes of a gang of time traveling kids. The first video (available for just $9.95, with a gift bag full of goodies)? “The Reagan Revolution.” Naturally. In this 90-second preview of the video, one sees a tale of an America in 1970s decay, where unemployed muggers in “DISCO” tanktops threatened anyone they could find with knives. Then came a man that could restore hope to the land: Ronald Reagan. Read on… It wasn’t long ago that Huckabee was also promoting David Barton’s dangerous revisionist history at the “Rediscover God In America” conference I posted on here — Huckabee Says He Wants Americans To Be Indoctrinated At Gunpoint by David Barton . I guess someone’s got to make up for Beck eventually leaving the air at Fox. Transcript below the fold. VAN SUSTEREN: All right, well, let me just turn quickly you have a learn our history. It’s a program you have. What is that? HUCKABEE: Greta, you know, if you tell an 8-year-old, Hey, I’d like to teach about American history, they’ll probably say to you, Why don’t you just set my hair on fire? But if you tell an 8-year-old, Hey, would you like to watch some cartoons, they’ll say, Oh, yeah. If the cartoons teach them that America is a good country and teaches them some wonderful things about America’s history, that’s Learn Our History is all about. It’s really a program for kids ages 7 and up to teach them American history in a language and in a format that makes sense to kids. Now, the thing that I find interesting, 91 percent of liberals who were shown the videos said they not only learned something, they would buy them for their kids. What I find interesting is that we’ve got a real serious history deficit in the country. Do you realize that only 25 percent of high school seniors in America surveyed even know that George Washington was the first president? That’s amazing to me that kids are that ignorant of their history of this great country. So Learn Our History is about helping them to learn it beyond the classroom in an entertaining and fun way. And I hope that people will take a look at the videos for their kids at Learnourhistory.com. VAN SUSTEREN: Yeah and it’s probably great for adults, too. I probably could use some refresher myself. Thank you, Governor. HUCKABEE: Thank you, Greta.

Continue reading …
Candice Crawford

Mental Health Minute: Mark Nation Mental Health Minute: Martha Haynie, Orange County Comptroller Mental Health Minute: Teresa Jacobs GreHanse says: Tony Romo, Cowboys quarterback and Jessica Simpson's ex, getting married to Candice Crawford Saturday http://bit.ly/j8pTC5

Continue reading …
David Cameron defends aid spending at G8 summit

PM launches passionate defence of Britain’s commitment to international aid and calls on other leaders to fulfil their pledges David Cameron made a scathing attack on his fellow leaders over aid to Africa at the end of their G8 summit, saying they were seen by the public as a bunch of men in suits, more interested in a good lunch than keeping their promises to the world’s poorest. He also issued a broadside against readers of the Daily Mail, reminding them that Britain’s aid budget was intended to save the lives of women in childbirth and to spare people in Africa from malaria. In a polemic issued midway through his G8 press conference at Deauville in France, he even argued it would have been better for Afghanistan if a fraction of the money now spent there by the UK military had earlier instead been spent on aid. His emotional defence of his spending priorities was made in response to a Daily Mail article (below, right) which had claimed that a report showing Britain spends more on aid than its G8 partners, was damning. The prime minister has been under growing pressure from Conservative backbenchers, as well as the defence secretary, Liam Fox, to reduce the growing aid budget in face of the recession, but clearly believes he will not shift on his promise to raise it to reach the target of 0.7% of British GDP by 2015. In a passionate defence of his stance, he said: “I think what people back home think about these summits is that a bunch of people in suits get together, make some promises, particularly to the world’s poorest; then they go in and have a big lunch, and forget about the promises. I am not prepared to do that. These are things that matter.” He recalled that he had thought it right that the world’s politicians at the G8 summit in 2005 made public pledges to help the world’s poorest. But he pointed out that they failed to match those promises of a $50bn increase in aid, falling short by $19bn in real terms, a point he had insisted was in the communique. His officials said that twice in private G8 sessions he raised the inability of world leaders to match their promises; the chief culprits are Germany and Italy. He went on: “If we are going to get across to the poorest people in the world that we care about their plight, and we want them to join one world with the rest of us, then we have got to make promises and keep promises. Of course it is difficult when we are having to make difficult decisions at home, but I don’t think 0.7 % of our gross national income is too high a price to pay for trying to save lives.” He then directly addressed Daily Mail readers: “If you are not convinced it is not right to vaccinate children against diarrhoea, to try and stop preventable diseases, and to try and save mothers in childbirth, if that does not do it for you, what about this argument? “That these countries that are broken, like Somalia and Afghanistan, if we don’t invest in them before they get like that, we end up with the problems; we end up paying the price with the terrorism, the crime and the mass migration, and the environmental devastation. “If we [had] spent a fraction of what we are paying now in Afghanistan on military equipment, into that country as aid and development when it had a chance perhaps of finding its own future, would that have not been a better decision? I know this is a controversial argument, but it’s an argument that can be won.” He went on: “Most people in this country want Britain to stand for something in the world, and to be something in the world and to punch above our weight. That did not just require military and diplomats, but also having a substantial aid budget to help at times of hurricanes, tsunamis or earthquakes. “I remember as a young politician watching the 2005 Gleneagles summit, and that Live 8 concert [events at 10 G8 locations and broadcast worldwide], and thinking it was right those world leaders made their pledges so publicly. I think when you make a promise to the poorest people in the world, you should keep it. And I am proud that Britain is doing that.” Development G8 David Cameron G8 Aid Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
WikiLeaks accused Bradley Manning ‘should never have been sent to Iraq’

Guardian exclusive: Soldier held over US intelligence leak was known to be mentally fragile and unsuited to army life The American soldier at the centre of the WikiLeaks revelations was so mentally fragile before his deployment to Iraq that he wet himself, threw chairs around, shouted at his commanding officers and was regularly brought in for psychiatric evaluations, according to an investigative film produced by the Guardian . Bradley Manning, who was detained a year ago on Sunday in connection with the biggest security leak in US military history, was a “mess of a child” who should never have been put through a tour of duty in Iraq, according to an officer from the Fort Leonard Wood military base in Missouri, where Manning trained in 2007. The officer’s words reinforce a leaked confidential military report that reveals that other senior officers thought he was unfit to go to Iraq. “He was harassed so much that he once pissed in his sweatpants,” the officer said. “I escorted Manning a couple of times to his ‘psych’ evaluations after his outbursts. They never should have trapped him in and recycled him in [to Iraq]. Never. Not that mess of a child I saw with my own two eyes. No one has mentioned the army’s failure here – and the discharge unit who agreed to send him out there,” said the officer, who asked not to be identified because of the hostility towards Manning in the military. “I live in an area where I would be persecuted if I said anything against the army or helped Manning,” the officer said. Despite several violent outbursts and a diagnosis of adjustment disorder, a condition that meant he was showing difficulty adjusting to military life, Manning was eventually sent to Iraq, where it is alleged he illegally downloaded thousands of sensitive military and diplomatic documents and passed them on to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks. In Iraq, Manning retained his security clearance to work as an intelligence specialist. Two months after his arrival, the bolt was removed from his rifle because he was thought to be a danger, his lawyer, David Coombs, has confirmed. A Guardian investigation focusing on soldiers who worked with Manning in Iraq has also discovered there was virtually no computer and intelligence security at Manning’s station in Iraq, Forward Operating Base Hammer. According to eyewitnesses, the security was so lax that many of the 300 soldiers on the base had access to the computer room where Manning worked, and passwords to access the intelligence computers were stuck on “sticky notes” on the laptop screens. Rank and file soldiers would watch grisly “kill mission” footage as a kind of entertainment on computers with access to the sensitive network of US diplomatic and military communications known as SIPRNet. Jacob Sullivan, 28, of Phoenix, Arizona, a former chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear specialist, was stationed at FOB Hammer in Manning’s unit. “A lot of different people worked from that building and in pretty much every room there was a SIPRNet computer attached to a private soldier or a specialist,” Sullivan said “On the computers that I saw there was a [sticky label] either on the computer or next to the computer with the information to log on. I was never given permission to log on so I never used it but there were a lot of people who did.” He added: “If you saw a laptop with a red wire coming out of it, you knew it was a SIPRNet. I would be there by myself and the laptops [would] be sitting there with passwords. Everyone would write their passwords down on sticky notes and set it by their computer. [There] wasn’t a lot of security going on so no wonder something like this transpired.” Manning is facing multiple charges of downloading and passing on sensitive information. No one else at the base has been charged. Manning denies all the charges. If convicted he could face up to 55 years in jail. The US Defence Security Service is also investigating why Manning, who had been sent for psychiatric counselling before he was deployed to Iraq, was not screened more fully before he was allowed to work in intelligence. Eyewitness accounts by soldiers who served with him there and friends in the US who spoke to the Guardian paint a picture of an increasingly unstable and at times violent man. One soldier who served with him describes him “blowing up and punching this chick in the face”. Additional reporting by Daniel Fisher Bradley Manning WikiLeaks US military United States Maggie O’Kane Chavala Madlena Guy Grandjean guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
WikiLeaks accused Bradley Manning ‘should never have been sent to Iraq’

Guardian exclusive: Soldier held over US intelligence leak was known to be mentally fragile and unsuited to army life The American soldier at the centre of the WikiLeaks revelations was so mentally fragile before his deployment to Iraq that he wet himself, threw chairs around, shouted at his commanding officers and was regularly brought in for psychiatric evaluations, according to an investigative film produced by the Guardian . Bradley Manning, who was detained a year ago on Sunday in connection with the biggest security leak in US military history, was a “mess of a child” who should never have been put through a tour of duty in Iraq, according to an officer from the Fort Leonard Wood military base in Missouri, where Manning trained in 2007. The officer’s words reinforce a leaked confidential military report that reveals that other senior officers thought he was unfit to go to Iraq. “He was harassed so much that he once pissed in his sweatpants,” the officer said. “I escorted Manning a couple of times to his ‘psych’ evaluations after his outbursts. They never should have trapped him in and recycled him in [to Iraq]. Never. Not that mess of a child I saw with my own two eyes. No one has mentioned the army’s failure here – and the discharge unit who agreed to send him out there,” said the officer, who asked not to be identified because of the hostility towards Manning in the military. “I live in an area where I would be persecuted if I said anything against the army or helped Manning,” the officer said. Despite several violent outbursts and a diagnosis of adjustment disorder, a condition that meant he was showing difficulty adjusting to military life, Manning was eventually sent to Iraq, where it is alleged he illegally downloaded thousands of sensitive military and diplomatic documents and passed them on to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks. In Iraq, Manning retained his security clearance to work as an intelligence specialist. Two months after his arrival, the bolt was removed from his rifle because he was thought to be a danger, his lawyer, David Coombs, has confirmed. A Guardian investigation focusing on soldiers who worked with Manning in Iraq has also discovered there was virtually no computer and intelligence security at Manning’s station in Iraq, Forward Operating Base Hammer. According to eyewitnesses, the security was so lax that many of the 300 soldiers on the base had access to the computer room where Manning worked, and passwords to access the intelligence computers were stuck on “sticky notes” on the laptop screens. Rank and file soldiers would watch grisly “kill mission” footage as a kind of entertainment on computers with access to the sensitive network of US diplomatic and military communications known as SIPRNet. Jacob Sullivan, 28, of Phoenix, Arizona, a former chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear specialist, was stationed at FOB Hammer in Manning’s unit. “A lot of different people worked from that building and in pretty much every room there was a SIPRNet computer attached to a private soldier or a specialist,” Sullivan said “On the computers that I saw there was a [sticky label] either on the computer or next to the computer with the information to log on. I was never given permission to log on so I never used it but there were a lot of people who did.” He added: “If you saw a laptop with a red wire coming out of it, you knew it was a SIPRNet. I would be there by myself and the laptops [would] be sitting there with passwords. Everyone would write their passwords down on sticky notes and set it by their computer. [There] wasn’t a lot of security going on so no wonder something like this transpired.” Manning is facing multiple charges of downloading and passing on sensitive information. No one else at the base has been charged. Manning denies all the charges. If convicted he could face up to 55 years in jail. The US Defence Security Service is also investigating why Manning, who had been sent for psychiatric counselling before he was deployed to Iraq, was not screened more fully before he was allowed to work in intelligence. Eyewitness accounts by soldiers who served with him there and friends in the US who spoke to the Guardian paint a picture of an increasingly unstable and at times violent man. One soldier who served with him describes him “blowing up and punching this chick in the face”. Additional reporting by Daniel Fisher Bradley Manning WikiLeaks US military United States Maggie O’Kane Chavala Madlena Guy Grandjean guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bachmann’s Iowa Debacle

Click here to view this media I heard it was bad. I didn’t know it was this frigging bad. Video by ABC5, Des Moines . Story by The Iowa Republican (from the website, “news for Republicans by Republicans”). “ This is a disaster ,” said one prominent Polk County Republican. An elected official called it “ an embarrassment ”. The embarrassing disaster was the result of Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann’s last minute cancellation of her appearance at the Polk County GOP’s Robb Kelley Dinner. Bachmann’s absence turned what should have been a very successful fundraiser into a black eye for herself, her presidential aspirations and the county party. Over 300 Republicans paid $75 per ticket to meet and listen to Bachmann. Media from around the country, and even as far away as Norway, descended on Des Moines to cover the event. Extra security was arranged. Speculation rose that she might announce a bid for the presidency at the event. Bachmann squashed that rumor the day before. Then, two hours before the event was scheduled to start, she informed Polk County GOP officials she would not be able to attend. The scheduling conflict arose because of a House vote on extending the Patriot Act. Backup plans were made for her to use a private jet. In the end, nothing worked and Bachmann was unable to make it. Instead, she appeared on choppy and blurry Skype-style video. Local Republicans were extremely displeased. “It’s awful,” said activist Becky Irvin. “ She just shot herself in the foot. She dissed Iowa. You don’t diss Iowa .” The Patriot Act extensions passed easily, 250-153. Bachmann’s presence was not vital. However, some attendees gave her the benefit of the doubt. “I don’t like it, but I understand,” said John Kline. A sucky video didn’t help matters. The Minnesota congresswoman’s speech-by-video only made matters worse. Bachmann made the mistake of name-dropping Donald Trump during her talk. “Donald Trump was right, we are getting our tail kicked by China,” she said. Last week, Trump cancelled his scheduled appearance at a Republican Party of Iowa fundraiser. Bachmann was clearly ignorant or tone deaf to that controversy. She apparently was not ignorant of the fact that people were bored by watching her speak on a poor quality video, because Bachmann apologized for being “longwinded”. She then opened it up for questions, but by that point, a significant portion of the crowd had seen enough. Several dozen attendees got up and left. Bachmann then answered two questions, taking several minutes responding to each. “I found myself zoning out and didn’t really follow it,” said one Polk County central committee member and event volunteer. Kevin Hall delivers the final coup de grâce : comparing Bachmann’s fundraiser disaster to the stink left by Newt Gingrich’s roll-out. Nothing about Michelle Bachmann seemed presidential Thursday night. Many people thought Newt Gingrich sunk his campaign in the week after his presidential announcement. Bachmann might have dealt a fatal blow to her campaign before she announces.

Continue reading …
Rolling Thunder spokesman slams Palin bus tour as a ‘big distraction’

Click here to view this media h/t: Heather Sarah Palin is kicking off her One Nation bus tour this weekend at the Rolling Thunder motorcycle rally in Washington, D.C. Rolling Thunder spokesman Ted Shpak said Friday that the former Republican vice presidential candidate was a “big distraction” from their mission of trying to bring awareness to prisoner of war/missing in action issues. “She wasn’t invited,” he told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. “We don’t endorse nobody. We have our program after our run down at the Lincoln Memorial and she’s not invited to speak. We’re not endorsing her.” “I know it’s an open event,” Mitchell noted. “She can get on the back of a Harley but you’re not exactly going to have her bus as part of your event.” “Absolutely not. We’re here for a reason and in a way this is been taking away from the reason we’re here,” Shpak explained. “It’s a big distraction.”

Continue reading …
Ed Miliband marries Justine Thornton – after leaving it late

Couple tie the knot on a day the wind and a whiff of Tory disapproval couldn’t spoil In the end it was all rather sweet. Even the photographers, as tough a bunch of brigands to be found this side of Corsica, found themselves slightly impressed as the definitely happy couple delivered the ritual kiss for their benefit, then traipsed back up the windswept drive hand-in-hand. On a blustery day in Middle England, all high hedges, tall, waving grasses and the pungent stink of manure, it had been a long wait for the snappers, though not as long as for the new Mrs Miliband and her two sons. Back in London, Dan and Sam now face a lifetime of stigma in advanced Labour circles: parents who are married (to each other). The wedding of Ed Miliband, 41, to Justine Thornton, 40, has been like no other among senior British politicians except Gordon Brown and Edward Heath, who both left it late, too late in Ted’s case. Most ambitious young thrusters marry quietly and have kids before they become important. Ed and Justine did it the other way around. As a result, their modest nuptial at Langar Hall on the outskirts of the Nottinghamshire village of Langar – close to where Mrs M grew up – has been dissected, bitched about and mocked more than most, even by Lily Allen who turns out to be tying her own knot with builder Sam Cooper, next month, the sentimentalist! Did it mean the Labour leader was selling out (some Labour activists are gagging to be betrayed) by embracing a form of bourgeois domesticity advocated by David Cameron? Did Ed’s failure to drag Justine to the altar earlier in their six-year tryst mean he was a commitment phobe? Or (more likely) a disorganised workaholic? Was he doing it for the pollsters – or was this the real deal? Long before local registrar Hazel Tait had done the deed – neither promised to obey, but then, nor does the Labour party – this was a wedding that had launched a thousand columns. Would the environmental lawyer be keeping her maiden name at work? Yes. And would her Alice Temperley dress be as good as Kate Middleton’s? Different, but stylish in its own, Regency high-waisted way. After all, the bride was once a child actor. Driving past the media huddle outside the gates,– TV cameras are not easy to miss in sleepy Langar – one Tory suggested a new, if not original, line of attack. Pointing at the nearby spire he called “There’s a church over there if they want to do it properly.” Too late for that, but they did it properly in their own low-key way. Fifty guests, all family and close friends, only one MP (apparently Ed’s brother, David, is a budding politician too); only two speeches – bride and groom – during a wedding breakfast of asparagus, lamb and pavlova. The couple later returned to London for a party with friends – and will fly off for a five-day European honeymoon today. No, they will not be Facebooking their whereabouts for the Daily Beast to stalk them, but Milibandologists know their man is too progressive to ignore the web entirely on such a happy day. “Thanks for all the good wishes. Really looking forward to the day. Feel like the luckiest guy in the world to be marrying Justine,” he tweeted. Taciturn Clem Attlee could have done it in 140 characters, but probably not Ed’s fellow-atheist, Neil Kinnock, who married his Glenys in a chapel to please their parents. As might be expected in the fox hunting-and-Stilton countryside of the Vale of Belvoir, Langar Hall turns out to have Tory connections: Ken Clarke, whose sacking the groom recently demanded, is the local MP and the Earls Howe (the current one is junior health minister ) are also Langar-linked. Imogen Skirving, who runs the hall (she was born there), is an ex-Tory councillor with an eye to publicity. Her hotel’s honeymoon four-poster rents at £195 a night, but has a single rate of £140 for marriages which don’t survive the reception. This was not the case on Friday. “It went absolutely smoothly, one of the happiest, easiest weddings we have ever done,” Skirving reported as hacks and snappers – kept at safe distance, like feudal retainers – awaited the promised delivery of the couple. Langar itself seemed unmoved. Two policemen were seen patrolling on foot. Members of the nearby Keyworth and District Cycling Association – most of pensionable age – briefly stopped pedaling to observe that the Labour leader had not exactly married with reckless haste. “You probably won’t have our vote,” biker Tony Fletcher shouted.” Probably definitely.” Dave Bishop, the Nottingham exhibitionist and campaigner, who stands at byelections, turned up to wish the Milibands well and – quite incidentally – advertise the Militant Elvis Anti-Tesco Popular Front under whose banner he got 322 votes (a personal best) in this month’s council elections. Dave was dressed as Elvis. But not even this could distract the media posse from the long wait or the whiff of manure, nature’s revenge on city-dwellers. Politics never smells so rank in the Westminster village! At 12.52, two small, distant figures could be seen walking down the long avenue of limes from Lungar Hall. One was wearing a high-waisted cream dress. It is a long time since DH Lawrence spun his fantasies in these parts. In a working Nottinghamshire village on a Friday in 2011 such an apparition could hardly be Connie Chatterly and Mellors. It had to be – and it was – the happy couple. As the westerly got into its stride they looked freezing, but were clearly bent on going, if not the extra mile for the hacks, then at least the extra 300 yards. Awkward, ungracious even, he may occasionally have been about love, in a Prince Charles sort of way, but yesterday they glowed. “She’s looking radiant” and “she’s lovely” called the snappers along with “kiss, kiss” and – just in case – “and again, sir, please.” “How is it going so far?” asked the Guardian. “Very well, great,” said the groom. Everyone seemed to mean it. As they walked back to the reception, Ayesha Hazarika, the leader’s spokesman, briefed us on what lovely things the pair were about to say about each other in their speeches. They hadn’t actually said it yet, but hey, this procedure is normal in politics, if not in Langar. It was all under embargo, of course, just in case they changed their minds. On this evidence, they won’t. Ed Miliband Labour Weddings Marriage Michael White guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Twitter buys UK’s TweetDeck for £25m

TweetDeck acquisition puts Britain’s web entrepreneurs on map, along with Shoreditch’s ‘Silicon Roundabout’ It was once famed for its art scene and residents with daft haircuts. But the area around Old Street, on the fringes of the City of London, has emerged as a magnet for internet startups to rival those in the US, earning it the nickname Silicon Roundabout after its famously unlovely traffic system. Iain Dodsworth, a 36-year-old Sheffield-educated computer programmer, this week became the poster boy for the area when he sold his three-year-old firm , TweetDeck, to social network company Twitter in a deal thought to be worth about $40m (£25m) – making the once-unemployed developer an overnight millionaire. The big-money deal is the clearest sign yet that the firms clustered in the area are capable of attracting talent that could match those of California’s Silicon Valley, the heartland of technology firms such as Facebook and Google. “It feels like a really big win for London,” says Dodsworth. “It feels like there’s something meaningful there. It’s quite a big deal that we were even bought in the first place. We are now Twitter, and we happen to be in London – it’s significant that Twitter understands the benefit of having something outside of San Francisco.” The term Silicon Roundabout was – in typically British self-deprecating style – coined two years ago as a riposte to accusations that London could never foster an environment to rival San Francisco. While the Old Street landmark does not host offices for Apple or Yahoo – and its gritty urban surrounds compare unfavourably with the rolling Californian landscape – Silicon Valley tech titans are increasingly looking to Shoreditch for their next acquisition. “We weren’t bought for £2.50 – we have shown that it’s not just a little acquisition and I think that’s quite meaningful,” Dodsworth says, the confetti still fresh around his desk from Wednesday’s announcement. “[The deal shows that] if a company is looking at acquiring smaller companies, they don’t just have to look at the US. Perhaps if we were just around the corner in Silicon Valley they’d have just snapped up the team, moved them in and that’s it.” Like many of east London’s digital firms, Dodsworth shares a large open-plan office with about a dozen other small internet companies, including SoundCloud and MobileRoadie . The office erupted with champagne and confetti when the deal was announced, and newspaper clippings – “Twitter buys TweetDeck”, “TweetDeck tycoon: I’ll stay at Silicon Roundabout” – are proudly displayed across their shiny Apple computers. The effect of “seeing this success rather than reading about it on [technology news site] TechCrunch” is something not to be underestimated – and is an integral part of Silicon Valley’s history of achievement, says Dodsworth. Richard Moross, founder of digital printing business Moo.com , moved his company to Shoreditch five years ago – long before what he calls its “ridiculous” new name was coined. The office space he leases to TweetDeck and others has a waiting list of more than 20 companies. “The reason why the Silicon Valley success story rolls on is because the people in those companies have success, share success, other people see it, they start new companies and the thing snowballs,” he says. “By having people in the same area – the same physical location – that is like an amplifying device. It’s a successful formula, and that’s why people want to move here.” Similar clusters of technology firms have sprung up outside London. Cambridge has Silicon Fen, home to a number of hi-tech outfits including chipmaker Arm Holdings and semiconductor manufacturer Cambridge Silicon Radio (CSR). The predictably named Silicon Glen is the triangle stretching from Glasgow to Edinburgh and Dundee that includes multinationals such as IBM, Semtech and National Semiconductor. However, web-based startups and aspirant social networks have tended to gravitate towards east London. The capital, and its resurgent tech scene, has a natural allure for twentysomething founders touting unproven business models – no doubt bolstered by the sky-high valuations being attached to US rivals such as LinkedIn and Zynga . And just as California’s techies shifted from military technology to transistors, computers and eventually the internet, so too is Shoreditch, still a heartland for traditional printing, changing its spots. To work in the same vicinity as TweetDeck inspires Nick Casey, the founder of the yet-to-launch sports social network Squadify . “Two desks over there’s a serial entrepreneur who has had multiple startups and gone through the whole funding process. To chat with these people over a cup of tea or a beer is gold dust – you can’t find that stuff on the internet.” Casey and fellow co-founder Andy Davey occupy a £275-a-month desk at TechHub, an expansive workspace-cum-common room just yards from Old Street roundabout. Only 11 months old, TechHub has already won sponsorship from Google. Instead of renting garage space from a friend of a friend – as Sergey Brin and Larry Page did 13 years ago when setting up Google – fledgling companies can get space at cheap rates and on flexible contracts. Just don’t ask TechHub co-founder Elizabeth Varley whether she’s attempting to recreate the famous San Francisco scene. “The holy grail of Silicon Valley – that it’s more a state of mind than a place – is true. It’s about the way you work and the approach you take,” she says. “What we did was to look at some of the success factors over there and see what we could do better – connecting people, connecting VCs [venture capitalists] with startups, large tech companies with startups – that’s something [the UK] hasn’t been particularly good at. While we’re a workspace, that’s just a basic need – the most important thing is the community of different elements of the startup ecosystem that help those young companies flourish.” Like the offices run by Moross, TechHub is full to bursting with fresh-faced entrepreneurs “sick of doing the Starbucks shuffle”, as Varley puts it. A new “entrepreneur visa” for foreign businesspeople who want to invest in the UK, unveiled as part of the government’s plans to create an “East London Tech City” in November, means the roundabout’s summer party – which has grown from 200 revellers to 1,000 in three years – could soon be overrun by digital aspirants. But for now the UK’s leading entrepreneurs are staying sober. Varley says: “Silicon Valley has had 60 years of investment in silicon and chips … It has two amazing universities, and it’s had a lot going on in the past, which means it has been able to spawn this internet boom over there – it hasn’t happened overnight. “Sometimes it takes a little more, but we’re on the way.” UK’s network success stories • TweetDeck Built by Iain Dodsworth while he was unemployed and looking for a way to organise his Twitter feeds, TweetDeck has been downloaded by more than 20

Continue reading …