David Cameron says it ‘simply isn’t acceptable’ for mothers to be left to bring up children on their own Fathers who abandon their families should be “stigmatised” by society in the same way as drink-drivers, David Cameron has said. The prime minister said “runaway dads” should be made to feel the “full force of shame” for their actions. In an article for the Sunday Telegraph to mark Father’s Day, he said it “simply isn’t acceptable” for mothers to be left to bring up children on their own. Cameron indicated his determination to introduce tax breaks for married couples – a Tory general election pledge that appeared to have been dropped by the coalition in the face of Liberal Democrat opposition. “I want us to recognise marriage in the tax system so as a country we show we value commitment,” he wrote. Before the election, Nick Clegg described Tory proposals to introduce a tax cut of at least £150 for married couples as ” patronising drivel that belong in the Edwardian age “. Cameron issued a strong defence of traditional family life, describing it as the “cornerstone of our society”, and called for a new drive to “bring fathers back into the lives of all our children”. Even when parents were separated, he said, fathers had a duty to support their children “financially and emotionally” – spending time with them at weekends, attending nativity plays and taking an interest in their education. Where men were unwilling to face up to their family obligations, Cameron said, it was up to the rest of society to make clear that such behaviour was unacceptable. “It’s high time runaway dads were stigmatised, and the full force of shame was heaped upon them,” he said. “They should be looked at like drink-drivers, people who are beyond the pale. “They need the message rammed home to them, from every part of our culture, that what they’re doing is wrong – that leaving single mothers, who do a heroic job against all odds, to fend for themselves simply isn’t acceptable.” Cameron described how he had learned his values from his own father, Ian Cameron, who died last year aged 77. “From my father, I learned about responsibility. Seeing him get up before the crack of dawn to go and do a hard day’s work and not come back until late at night had a profound impact on me,” he said. David Cameron Conservatives Parents and parenting Family Father’s Day Children guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …In announcing that he will resign from Congress on Thursday, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) was heckled as he addressed the media at a press conference in his New York district. “I’m here again today to apologize for the mistakes I have made and the embarrassment I have caused,” said the embattled lawmaker, who had become embroiled in an online sexual controversy. “Today I am announcing my resignation from Congress.” Cheers from some in attendance could be heard as Weiner announced he was stepping down from his post. My Fox NY relays what happened next as the New York Democrat continued making his remarks: One man continued to heckle Weiner, making it hard to hear his speech. The man yelled “bye-bye pervert” and asked him about the size of his penis. Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife and a close adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, did not appear alongside her husband at the press conference. Click here for a timeline chronicling the controversy leading up to Weiner’s resignation. Click here for a rundown on the various women who have been linked or involved in the scandal. WATCH: if(typeof AOLVP_cfg===’undefined’)AOLVP_cfg=[];AOLVP_cfg.push({id:’AOLVP_997168140001′,’codever’:0.1, ‘autoload’:false, ‘autoplay’:false, ‘playerid’:’61371448001′, ‘videoid’:’997168140001′, ‘width’:480, ‘height’:270, ‘stillurl’:’http://pdl.stream.aol.com/pdlext/aol/brightcove/aolmaster/1612833736/1612833736_997134352001_ari-origin29-arc-105-1308250807646.jpg?pubId=1612833736′, ‘playertype’:’inline’,’videotitle’:’Anthony Weiner gets heckled at resignation – 06/16/11′,’videodesc’:’MSNBC’,’videolink’:’#’});
Continue reading …Anti-corruption campaigner Antonio Di Pietro believes last week’s referendum defeat could spell the beginning of the end for Berlusconi After one of the worst weeks of Silvio Berlusconi’s political career, the former magistrate who has spent the 15 years denouncing the prime minister’s behaviour is pretty pleased with himself. As a magistrate in the early 1990s, Antonio Di Pietro famously battled corruption in Italy’s “clean hands” investigation, which led to the meltdown of the country’s main political parties. It was also Di Pietro who called for the referendum which defeated Berlusconi’s plans to build nuclear power plants and privatise the water supply. The setback, following disastrous local election results, prompted even close allies to wonder if the media mogul had reached the end of his political shelf life. Di Pietro is jubilant. “Right now is the moment to rebuild Italy,” he told the Observer , “and we must find an alternative to Silvio Berlusconi, whether he likes it or not.” Berlusconi’s poll numbers have tumbled from 40% to 29% in the wake of his trials for bribery and alleged payment to a teenage runaway for sex. Two weeks before the Di Pietro-inspired referendum, Berlusconi’s party, Il Popolo della Libertà (The People of Freedom), lost control of Milan – the prime minister’s heartland – when a former Communist won the local mayoral election. The push for the referendum was buoyed by support from web campaigns and Facebook, which proliferated despite the limited coverage of the vote on Italy’s state-controlled TV networks. Di Pietro senses belated vindication. The rough-and-ready former magistrate’s run-ins with Berlusconi over the past 15 years are the stuff of legend. The magistrate emerged from the “clean hands” probe as one of Italy’s most popular men, prompting Berlusconi to offer him a job as interior minister after the media mogul was first elected prime minister in 1994. According to Marco Travaglio, an Italian journalist who has documented Berlusconi’s tangles with the law, Berlusconi took Di Pietro’s rejection badly. “Di Pietro turned him down then,” he said, “and again in 1995, prompting the entourage of Berlusconi to cook up a series of false dossiers revealing alleged corruption, which kept Di Pietro tied up in the courts during the mid-90s proving his innocence. The mud-slinging machine that Berlusconi has used against his ex-wife and others was honed on Di Pietro.” “Berlusconi discovered I wasn’t for sale and henceforth tried to convince Italians that I was a criminal,” said Di Pietro. The feud has never stopped. Di Pietro, who founded his own political party, Italy of Values, has described Berlusconi as the “rapist of democracy” and “an arrogant little dictator” who entered politics to escape justice. Berlusconi has in turn claimed the former magistrate “put innocent people in prison, ruining their lives and their families” during the “clean hands” campaign. According to Di Pietro, it is largely down to Berlusconi that Italy’s fraud and corruption problems are almost as bad now as they were in the early 1990s. Tax evasion amounts to the equivalent of 16% of gross domestic product, while the country’s mafia clans boast revenues of around €135bn (£120bn). “Berlusconi introduced the idea that you can do what you want,” Di Pietro said. “Today the first thought of anyone with a title, from mayor down to parking attendant, is: who can I cheat?” Asked if Italy is suffering from an honesty deficit, Di Pietro said: “Yes, but this is because people see politicians paying less for their crimes and are encouraged to try to scam everyone else.” The tide is finally turning, he argues. Apart from defeating the government’s plans for nuclear power and water privatisation, the referendum also overturned Berlusconi’s law allowing ministers to use official business as an excuse to delay trials they are involved in. “Before, Berlusconi was saying ‘I can do whatever I like’. Well, he can’t say that any more,” said Di Pietro. The stinging defeat, he said, would make Berlusconi think twice about his next reported measure – a law to shorten trials which would be likely to “time out” those he is already involved in: “If he tries that, we could be looking at a real revolt in Italy.” Silvio Berlusconi Italy Tom Kington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Congresswoman will come under scrutiny about hardline politics. But will she be able to reach beyond her Tea Party base? Mary Cecconi is the only Democrat to have beaten Michele Bachmann, the rising star of the Republican right, in a popular election. “It’s my claim to fame!” she laughs. Her victory came in a race in 1999 for a seat on the school board of Stillwater, Minnesota, a tiny, picturesque river town on the banks of the Mississippi. Bachmann – then known locally as a conservative education activist – had unexpectedly run as part of a slate of rightwing Republicans. The move politicised what had previously been a non-partisan affair. It failed. Cecconi, the incumbent, held her position. It was a minuscule electoral footnote yet it saw the political birth of a woman who just 12 years later is running for president and electrifying the radical right wing of the party. Bachmann, who announced her White House run last week, and then shone in the first major Republican debate, is eclipsing Sarah Palin as the new darling of the Tea Party. She is an evangelical whose husband runs a controversial Christian counselling service. She is a Minnesota congresswoman who has vowed to repeal healthcare reform and lambasts Barack Obama as a socialist. Like Palin, she makes political capital of her role as a mother to a large family: five children of her own and more than 20 foster kids. She is also a glamorous woman in a party that is frequently dominated by older white men. Yet her remarkable story began with that Stillwater race and Cecconi, now head of a parental lobbying group for schools in Minnesota, is not the only person to remember it. Joan Beaver, a now retired Stillwater high school teacher, recalled the election as heralding a shift in the town away from smalltown moderate Republicanism towards more extreme rightwing thought. “The town changed,” she said, noting that the shift occurred after the development of suburban housing estates and an influx of wealthy newcomers. Bachmann was part of the influx. She was born in Iowa, although the family moved to Minnesota when she was young. After a divorce, her mother remarried and Bachmann spent her childhood in a family of working-class Democrats. The real change came during adolescence, when at 16 she became “born again”. She went on to study law at the religious Oral Roberts University, which taught a biblical worldview alongside its legal classes. By the time Bachmann and her husband, Marcus, arrived in Stillwater with their burgeoning family they were staunch members of the religious right. She home-schooled her own children, but by law had to enrol her foster children into local public schools. It was that experience – she saw the state curriculum as too liberal and politically correct – that led to her becoming involved in educational activism, and ultimately politics. Still, to Beaver it seems strange to see the Bachmann she knew from Stillwater school politics striding across the American political stage with officially declared ambitions to capture the Oval Office and become the most powerful woman in the world. “She has more perseverance and staying power than anyone expected,” Beaver said. Many on the American left see Bachmann’s presidential ambitions as little more than a joke: the punchline to a gag about how far right the Republican party has drifted. She is mocked and lampooned by those who expect her to fail. But not all of her opponents in Stillwater are joining in that ridicule. Cecconi is certainly not. She recalls going to an education meeting only two days after beating Bachmann in 1999. Bachmann was supposed to be playing second fiddle to a speech by education campaigner Michael Chapman. But instead she had become the main attraction: “She was amazing. She held the room in her hand.” A year later Bachmann would run for – and win – a state senate seat. Shortly after that she would run for the US Congress in the sprawling district of which Stillwater is a part. She would emerge victorious from that, too. Now she is running for the White House. Cecconi has a warning for those mocking her: “She has got as far as she has by people underestimating her. I am not going to underestimate her.” Even Bachmann’s admirers, however, sometimes confess that her passionate style of ultra-rightwing politics has its drawbacks. “It is very attractive to some folks, and she certainly does not hesitate to say what she thinks. But that can upset others,” said Edwin Cain, a Stillwater-based lobbyist who has worked frequently with Bachmann. Indeed, it is not hard to find Bachmann critics, even among Republican supporters in the town. Though she makes her home here – in a million-dollar house on an upmarket estate near the golf course – this is not automatically Bachmann territory. The town is prosperous and thrives on a tourist economy; Main Street is packed with bistros and bars and represents a slice of urban city life with a hint of liberal values. Preston Norris, who works in a bar, voted for Bachmann for Congress but will not do so for the presidency. “She has some views that are just too much for that office,” he said bluntly. It is not hard to see what those views are. Bachmann’s criticism of homosexuality is open and brutal. She has led the charge against gay marriage, even at the cost of a once-close relationship with a lesbian stepsister. In 2004 Bachmann said of gay people: “It’s a very sad life. It’s part of Satan, I think, to say that this is gay. It’s anything but gay.” She is on record as viewing homosexuality as a “disorder” or a “sexual dysfunction” and is a staunchly anti-abortion Christian conservative. She believes Obama is “the final leap to socialism” in America, and has accused him of wanting to set up youth indoctrination camps for teenagers. She has called for investigations into fellow congressional politicians to see if they are “anti-American”. She once claimed to know of a plan to give up half of Iraq to Iran. She is against raising America’s debt ceiling for running up its deficit, and wants to repeal healthcare reform in its entirety. She is a firm sceptic on the dangers of global warming. She once introduced a resolution seeking to prevent the dollar being replaced by a foreign currency, despite the fact that such a move is already illegal. She has called the Environmental Protection Agency a “job-killing” organisation. Such extremism can lead to some very odd ideological bedfellows. Away from Stillwater, in the rural hinterland of Bachmann’s vast congressional district, she is more popular. Here, in a landscape of deeply religious small towns and rolling farms, Bachmann’s support is solid. In Buffalo, a small community beside a lake of the same name, one Bachmann supporter was delighted she was running. “I think it’s great! She can win and I have found the president very disappointing,” said one elderly woman who declined to give her name. Asked what was most disappointing about Obama, the woman said: “He has not been honest about being a Muslim.” Such beliefs are unusual, but not exactly unknown in these parts. Not far from Buffalo lies the town of Annandale, which acts as the base for a rightwing Christian ministry called You Can Run But You Cannot Hide. Led by the drummer of nu-metal band Junkyard Prophet, Bradlee Dean, the ministry has made its name by denying Obama’s Christianity and also promoting slurs against gay people, accusing them of child abuse and even once suggesting they be executed. Yet Bachmann herself has headlined a fundraising gala for Dean and his ministry. That sort of thing has so far passed under the radar of most American media, but seasoned Bachmann-watchers, such as Stillwater writer Karl Bremer, whose Ripple in Stillwater blog has chronicled Bachmann’s career, believe that will not last for long now: “She has to soften her image. But her image is already on the table. She is in the big leagues now. It is not just a little congressional race.” Bremer believes Bachmann’s politics and career are about to get the sort of scrutiny they have long deserved. Indeed, he has already chronicled much of it on his blog. “She has got plenty of skeletons in her closet,” he said. One of those skeletons could be her relationship with Frank Vennes, a man who served time in jail for cocaine distribution and money-laundering after being convicted in 1987. After his release, and apparently after finding God while in prison, Vennes became a friend of Bachmann and a big campaign donor for her elections. However, Vennes has recently been indicted on charges stemming from a Ponzi scheme and could end up behind bars again. That is a juicy story. As are Bachmann’s links to the mysterious “Bobby Charles Thompson”, who disappeared after the collapse of his apparently fraudulent fundraising organisation, which had been portrayed as a navy veterans’ group. Arrest warrants have now been issued for Thompson, whose real identity is not known. But what is known is that Thompson’s group donated campaign funds to Bachmann. Then there is the issue of the Bachmann family farm in Wisconsin. The large rural property has been the recipient of considerable government largesse in the form of agricultural subsidies, despite the fact that Bachmann is a vociferous critic of government handouts. Yet Bremer’s blog has reported that the farm has reaped the Bachmanns about $154,000 of government cash since 2001. That is obviously not illegal but – given Bachmann’s virulent dislike of state welfare – it could make for some interesting headlines. Finally, there are bizarre incidents such as the one in 2005 when Bachmann accused two lesbians of trying to lock her in a lavatory and keep her prisoner. The women claimed they were just trying to talk to her about her anti-gay beliefs, but Bachmann went to the police. However, the authorities dismissed her claims. “Both women simply wanted to discuss certain issues further with Ms Bachmann,” wrote the county attorney, who declined to press the matter. To her supporters – and there are many of them – such incidents do not matter. They are either irrelevant or part of the media plot against her. “The media beat up on her. I don’t know why,” said Lee Bohlsen, chairwoman of the Republican party of Washington county, in which Stillwater lies. Bohlsen is an enthusiastic fan, praising Bachmann’s attention to detail and warm personality. “I definitely think she can win. She is unwavering and she has a very strong character,” she said. Indeed, there is no doubting Bachmann’s political talents. She ticks all the same boxes as Palin but has a more polished image, even more conservative credentials, and a family and religious outlook that makes Palin look positively liberal. She also has a prodigious, widely admired work ethic and a fierce sense of mission. “She is absolutely hard-driving and passionate, but that does not make her unpleasant to work with,” said Karen Effrem, a conservative education activist who has worked with her. “It makes her a dynamo. I’m pleased she is running.” Reconciling the liberal and conservative visions of Bachmann is impossible. Her detractors and supporters inhabit different worlds. But it has led to speculation that Bachmann might privately not believe all she says in public: that her ambition is simply to bask in the spotlight. Perhaps, like Palin, she may have more of an eye on realising her value on the lucrative TV talk show circuit than on winning a political race. Bremer is unsure of the theory and not keen to test it. “Does she believe what she says? Or is it just a road to success?” he said. “I don’t know the answer to that – but I do think she should be stopped.” Michele Bachmann US elections 2012 Sarah Palin Tea Party movement Barack Obama US politics United States Republicans Paul Harris guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Plans to link electricity grids offer the UK a chance to meet its clean energy targets – but threaten to blight Irish beauty spots Ireland’s unspoiled, windswept west coast could become the focus of a new wave of wind farm construction in the wake of a high-level diplomatic meeting to be held tomorrow in London. UK deputy prime minister Nick Clegg, Taoiseach Enda Kenny and other senior members of the British-Irish Council will gather to discuss a plan to expand electricity grid connections throughout the British Isles. In particular, they want to build new inter-connectors to link the electricity grids of Ireland and Britain in order to transmit power from new windfarms in Ireland to England. The aim of the plan, created by the British government, is to open up remote regions that could provide Britain with more power generated by wind farms, as well as by tide and wave plants, and so reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. “The west coast of Ireland has some of the fiercest winds in Europe,” said Charles Hendry, the UK energy minister, who will be attending the meeting. “They whip in off the Atlantic which makes it is an ideal location for wind farms. However, the Irish market for electricity is less than a tenth of that of Britain. That means that companies cannot afford to build wind farms in Ireland because there is no market for their power. We want to put that right.” The construction of wind farms in Ireland that would supply power to neighbouring countries could help to put the UK back on track in its use of clean, renewable energy. Britain has recently been criticised for falling short of its targets for constructing wind power plants and for cutting its carbon emissions. Importing clean power could help to resolve the problem. A link connecting the grids of Ireland and Britain is currently under construction and will stretch from Rush North Beach, Co Fingal, to Barkby Beach, north Wales. The Irish Sea Inter-Connector will cost £500m and have a capacity of 500 megawatts. However, under the scheme to be discussed tomorrow, other new links would also be built. This would open up a market for electricity for wind farms on the west coast of Ireland whose power could be transmitted under the Irish Sea. Developments like these would be controversial, however. Construction of wind turbines generates strong opposition and plans to build clusters in mainland Britain have been greeted with fury. Opponents say wind turbines rarely work to capacity; spoil some of the country’s most beautiful landscapes; and kill large numbers of wild birds. Supporters argue that wind farms help to reduce dependence on carbon-emitting fossil-fuel plants and are non-polluting. Nevertheless, the prospect of giant turbines peppering the wild, craggy coasts of the Dingle Peninsula, Kerry and Galway will provoke a furious response. Hendry rejected the idea that the turbines would be controversial in Ireland, however. “It will be up to the Irish government and the Irish people to decide if they want to build them. This is a voluntary programme and it could bring significant wealth to the country with very little downside.” The All Islands electricity plan is not confined to Ireland and Britain. The British-Irish Council meeting – which will also be attended by Alex Salmond, Scotland’s first minister, and leaders of local governments in Wales, Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man – will consider a number of proposals to modernise the British Isles’ electricity grid network. Some of these focus on existing sources, in particular onshore and offshore wind turbines, while others anticipate the construction of new forms of energy generation such as wave and tidal power. The islands of Islay and Orkney have already been targeted as promising sites for tidal plants. However, all sites suffer from the problem of remoteness, an issue targeted by the plan to be discussed tomorrow. “Some of the best resources for generating tidal power lie in waters off the Channel Islands,” said Hendry. “But as things stand at present, there is no way to get that power to mainland Britain. We need to look at building a new inter-connector with France, taking it from the new nuclear power station currently being built at Flamanville, via the Channel Islands, to the UK. When the tides are right at Jersey and Guernsey, we could take electricity from their wave generators, and when they are not providing power, take it from Flamanville.” Hendry added that earlier discussions with delegates indicated that the plan would be well received tomorrow. Once the various proposals had been discussed, detailed analysis would be carried out over the next 18 months with the aim of turning them into specific projections that could be launched in 2013. Wind power Renewable energy Ireland Energy Energy industry Robin McKie guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …ResPublica thinktank set up by Phillip Blond rails against ‘appalling experience’ of too many British children David Cameron’s “big society” project is failing children as parks, play schemes and community projects close across the country, a hard-hitting report by one of the prime minister’s favourite thinktanks has declared. A study by ResPublica – which was set up by Cameron’s intellectual soulmate, Phillip Blond – will raise fresh doubts about whether the government’s localism and “big society” agendas can succeed as public service cuts bite. Its publication comes amid rumours that Cameron’s most trusted strategist, Steve Hilton, one of the chief architects of the “big society” concept along with Blond, is growing frustrated with its lack of progress and with the government’s apparent stalling on public service reform as a result of pressure from the Liberal Democrats. Commenting on the report, Children and the Big Society , Blond said: “Our poor record on child welfare obscures the dark reality – the appalling experience that some children endure on a daily basis. Our research found a strong correlation between low levels of trust and poor environment and poor health, negligent parenting, child abuse and low achievement.” In another sign that pressure is mounting on the government over children’s services, a nationwide network of campaigners battling to save Sure Start centres launches an attack on Cameron on Father’s Day in a letter in today’s Observer . Claiming that the prime minister has broken his pre-election promise to protect them and build on their success, campaign groups from across the country write: “His cuts mean some areas have 25% less than last year to spend on early years’ services, and the loss of the ringfenced funds [to local authorities] means councils don’t even have to spend that money on children. “As a result, the Sure Start network of centres is being hollowed out. The loss is greater than he may imagine… We simply ask David Cameron to keep his promise; to rethink his cuts, or at least reinstate the ringfence.” The ResPublica report will be formally launched this week by Andrew Stunell, the communities minister, in a move that confirms the coalition is taking its findings seriously. It criticises the closures of facilities for children, including parks, play schemes and community projects , suggesting that the government should protect them and give children the right to challenge decisions that affect them. The current economic climate was no excuse for failing to act. “It is possible to build connections between children and between families – it is easy and it does not cost extra,” says the report. Among its recommendations is a plan to pilot a number of large-scale, comprehensive community building projects to protect and help vulnerable children. Friends of Hilton have dismissed suggestions that he is on the brink of quitting Downing Street because of a lack of progress on the “big society” and public service reform, although he is said to be frustrated at the way the plan has failed to take off. A joint Daycare Trust/4Children survey on Sure Start children’s centres showed that 250 centres (7%) will close or are expected to close, affecting an estimated 60,000 families. Staff at 1,000 centres (28%) have been issued with “at risk of redundancy” notices. A Department for Education spokesman said local authorities had been given funds to provide facilities such as Sure Start centres and that, if they decided not to do so, they would be held accountable. “Local authorities have statutory duties to meet local need with sufficient childcare and children’s centres, and to support vulnerable children, young people and families. Councils … are accountable to the public for the decisions they make,” said the spokesman. “In a tough financial climate, we have given councils greater freedom over how they can spend taxpayers’ money, including the £2.2bn in early intervention grant in 2011-12 and 2012-13, to ensure it is spent on the services and support needed most in their area.” Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, said: “David Cameron should listen to mums and dads across the country who are desperately worried their local children’s centres are being axed because of the scale of the Sure Start cuts. “The prime minister promised to protect Sure Start, but he has cut the budget by 20%. He clearly doesn’t get how much Sure Start means to families across the country.” Public services policy David Cameron Public sector cuts Public finance Children Thinktanks Toby Helm guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Leading health experts say services cannot be sustained and the government must wield the axe – risking wrath from public Twenty hospitals must shut if the NHS is to improve its levels of care, according to leading health experts and government advisers. Fears are growing that the row over health secretary Andrew Lansley’s reforms has proved a distraction from the need to act quickly amid a financial crisis within the health service. Problems over the controversial Health and Social Care Bill appear far from over, with many peers determined to subject the revised legislation to thorough scrutiny in the Lords. However, writing for the Observer today , Professor Chris Ham, chief executive of the King’s Fund, an influential health thinktank, calls on the government to focus on drastic cuts to 10% of the country’s hospitals amid a squeeze on spending on the NHS. Ham writes: “The challenge of improving care by changing where services are provided is not new. What is different today is the financial pressures facing the NHS and the prospect that funding in England will not increase above the rate of inflation for at least four years. Several hospitals have large deficits and it is clear that existing services cannot be sustained either clinically or financially. Financial pressures are increasing by the day and will adversely affect quality unless ministers recognise the urgent need to change the way services are provided. “Up to 20 hospitals, around 10% of the total in England, may not be financially sustainable and will have to be merged or taken over. Many others face financial or clinical challenges that require changes to the services they provide.” A source close to the government said Sir David Nicholson, chief executive of the NHS, was aware that 20 of his hospitals needed to close or merge. “It has been a storm brewing, but everyone knows it has to be done,” the source added. “The problem – and the government knows it – is that people will link the reform bill with these closures. But this needs to happen.” Professor Steve Field, who headed the government’s NHS reforms “listening exercise”, also backed Ham, although he conceded that the cuts would provoke a furious backlash, particularly in London, which is set to be disproportionately hit. “It’s time we grasped the nettle of reconfiguration,” Field said. “Unless we tackle this, we won’t be able to meet the demands of the ageing population. It’s difficult and unpopular, but if we do it we can produce better, safer services for patients and will ultimately save lives. “The NHS’s future will inevitably mean more care being delivered outside of hospitals, which means that over time we will need fewer hospitals than we have today, particularly in the bigger cities, and especially in London, where it’s been a problem for many years that a lot of hospitals all try to do the same thing, which results in some surgeons doing too few cases.” The leader of Britain’s hospital doctors also backed calls for change. Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said concentrating certain types of care into a smaller number of sites benefited patients because those hospitals end up with bigger teams of specialists and find it much easier to have a fully staffed rota. “People want a hospital at the end of the road, just as they want a library, swimming pool or post office nearby. But it’s not possible,” he said. Dr Jennifer Dixon, director of the Nuffield Trust health thinktank and a member of the Downing Street “kitchen cabinet”, which is advising on the future of the NHS, added that growing financial pressures upon it – which include flat budgets until 2015 and an ongoing £20bn savings drive – meant hospitals are at risk of going bust: “A number of hospitals – in the ballpark of 20 to 30 – are simply not financially viable in their current form now and would be effectively bankrupt unless they can change their models of care.” NHS Health Health policy Thinktanks Andrew Lansley Public services policy Denis Campbell Daniel Boffey Toby Helm guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Bill Maher threw potential GOP presidential candidate and current Governor of Texas Rick Perry under the bus and ran over him a few times during his New Rules segment on Real Time With Bill Maher this week. MAHER: And finally New Rule, if you think the Republican presidential candidates can’t possibly get any lamer, then you haven’t met the new Republican flavor of the month, Rick Perry. If you’re not familiar with Rick, he took over as governor of Texas from George W. Bush, who’s now referred to as “the smart one.” Rick carries a gun even when he’s jogging. He wears cowboy boots with a suit, and the boots say, “come and take it”, which sounds kind of gay to me. And he threw such a tantrum when Obama won, he actually talked about Texas succeeding from the union, because that’s what America needs; a President of the United States who’s not really sold on the whole “United States” concept. Now, last week, Rick Perry announced that he rented out a 70,000 seat football stadium in Houston, for something called the response, which sounds like a home pregnancy test, but actually is to quote the governor “a Christian prayer service to provide spiritual solutions to the many challenges we face as a nation.” Or as stadium employees are calling it, batshit day. I guess the idea is to get together in a big group and pray all at once. That way the signal is stronger and god doesn’t lose you when he’s going through a canyon. But here on planet reality, may I point out that there is no such thing as spiritual solutions to national problems. If that’s where we are as a country, if our official government policy is “yee haw… Jesus take the wheel!” then we’re dead already. On his JesusPalooza web site, Perry writes, there is hope for America. It lies in heaven and we will find it on our knees. He also says some beyond our power to solve. What?! I thought we were the can do people. And if Perry thinks only god can solve our problems, why is he even in government? Why doesn’t he just stay at home and light a bunch of candles like Sissy Spacek’s mom in Carrie? Here’s an opposing view. Not only are our problems NOT beyond our power to solve, they’re actually fairly easy to solve. You have a giant budget deficit, like Perry has in Texas, raise taxes. Federal tax revenues haven’t been this low since 1950 and THAT, plus two wars and a recession are the reason we have a huge deficit. It’s not because god is angry over the gay kissing on Glee. It doesn’t require prayer to solve it, it requires a calculator. Politicians like to say, “We need new ideas.” Bullshit. “New ideas” is just a secular version of spiritual solutions, someone who’s going to magically fix everything. What new idea is going to solve our health care crisis, a magic pill that makes obese children crap out gold bricks? We don’t need new ideas. We need the balls to implement the ideas we already know work, cut corporate welfare, slash the defense budget, tax the rich, support the strong unions that created a middle class in the first place, build infrastructure and take the profit out of health care. By the way, Rick Perry isn’t just talking when he says he has spiritual solutions. Back in April when faced with a devastating drought, Rick did what any solutions oriented, 21st century civil servant would do. He proclaimed a day of prayer for rain, because we’re ancient Mayans now. Here’s what Texas looked like back in April with the drought in red. And here’s the Eden it is here today. If the words of Sister Mary Ignatius, god answers all your prayers and sometimes the answer is no.
Continue reading …As NewsBusters has been reporting since Monday's Republican presidential debate, MSNBC's Chris Matthews is suddenly a big fan of Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's (R-Minn.). On Saturday's “Fox News Watch,” syndicated columnist Cal Thomas said, “Chris Matthews praises her, which is sort of like getting a civil rights affirmation from David Duke” (video follows with transcript and commentary): JON SCOTT, HOST: That's new Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann striking a cord at a Republican debate earlier this week. Cal, she got some pretty good reviews from the mainstream press, and yet many of those same members of the press were trying to tear her down before the debate. CAL THOMAS: Right, the Left likes to build up people in order to tear them down. One of my favorite lines on this was that she exceeded expectations. Well, who set the expectations? The media did. And then, she got endorsed. Your time is coming. It's actually passed, but we're keeping you here anymore. ALAN COLMES: You would know. THOMAS: Yes, I would. Yes, actually. Chris Matthews praises her, which is sort of like getting a civil rights affirmation from David Duke. COLMES: Let’s attack the liberal media. Oh, come on, it's getting old, will you please? THOMAS: Like you are. COLMES: You’re still older. THOMAS: That’s true, but I’m better. Indeed you are, Cal. Indeed you are. Readers are advised Thomas was given the Media Research Center's “William F. Buckley Jr. Award for Media Excellence” at the MRC’s annual Gala on May 7.
Continue reading …Newsweek's Evan Thomas on Friday tried to float the typical media meme that neither Party is doing anything to solve our nation's budget crisis. Unfortunately for him, fellow “Inside Washington” panelist Charles Krauthammer accurately noted that the Republicans have offered a proposal to cut $6.6 trillion in the next ten years, “but the Democrats have done nothing except to demagogue the plan and to destroy it” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: But look, Evan is saying the politicians are not offering anything, and that’s not true. The Democrats aren’t offering anything. The President has given us a $1.5 trillion deficit. He hasn’t done anything on entitlements. The Republicans have stepped up and offered a plan. You can have a critique of it. EVAN THOMAS, NEWSWEEK: Here’s a critique.. KRAUTHAMMER: The Medicare plan is essentially what was recommended by a Democratic commission in 1999 headed by Alice Rivlin. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: Not quite. KRAUTHAMMER: Not exactly radical right-wing stuff as Gingrich himself would say. THOMAS: It is completely unrealistic to think that you’re going to deal with this problem without tax increases. Completely Mars, other universe… KRAUTHAMMER: The Democrats have not offered… THOMAS: Republicans are absolutely determined not to raise taxes. KRAUTHAMMER: You said the politicians are not looking at the problem of debt. The Republicans have offered to cut $6.6 trillion. Now, in the end, it would obviously have to be a deal in which taxes are included, but the Democrats have done nothing except to demagogue the plan and to destroy it, leaving us with what? With the Bush, with the Obama administration budget which was defeated 97-0 in the Senate because it is so embarrassing. THOMAS: So you’re admitted, you’re saying here the Republicans are going to face up to reality and raise taxes? KRAUTHAMMER: The Republicans are opening the debate by saying we start by cutting completely out of control spending way above… THOMAS: But you endorse, Charles, you are endorsing higher taxes? KRAUTHAMMER: Of course I am endorsing higher taxes. I’ve done it in print for years, and I’ve done it a month ago. The problem is you start with spending because we are historically much higher than we were for the last 50 years. We’re at 25 percent of GDP. The historic average is 19. You have to start there. In the end, of course you’re going to have tax reform, which will include the raising of revenue. It really is a darned shame the Obama-loving media can't be honest about this issue. America is facing likely its worst fiscal crisis in its history requiring bold action by political leaders. Instead of assisting the process by accurately reporting the goings on, so-called journalists have opted to take sides and present the Democrat argument at every turn. As Krauthammer accurately noted, there are currently only two plans on the table and the one offered by the President got absolutely zero votes in the Senate. For their part, Democrats in both chambers not only voted against Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) bill, they have also opted not to offer a plan of their own having actually not proposed a budget now for over two years. That our media choose to not castigate Democrats for this disgraceful abdication of their responsibility is deplorable. Much like Thomas, their goal is just to get taxes raised. But as Krauthammer correctly pointed out, the first step in this process has to be reining in spending. Once that is accomplished, tax reform should follow to simplify the current code while likely increasing total revenues much as Reagan accomplished in his second term. If the press continue to push exclusively for tax hikes, the Democrats will never feel they need to come to the spending reduction table thereby preventing any chance for serious budget discussions. Ironically, so-called journalists often question where the adult is in these negotiations. Maybe they should be asking that of themselves, for as long as they act like children, the Party they support will be similarly able to do so.
Continue reading …