Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 223)
Fukushima radiation reaches lethal levels

Discovery at crippled plant a fresh reminder of risks faced by workers battling to contain nuclear accident Pockets of lethal levels of radiation have been detected at Japan’s crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in a fresh reminder of the risks faced by workers battling to contain the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl. Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) reported on Monday that radiation exceeding 10 sieverts (10,000 millisieverts) per hour was found at the bottom of a ventilation stack standing between two reactors. On Tuesday Tepco said it found another spot on the ventilation stack itself where radiation exceeded 10 sieverts per hour, a level that could lead to incapacitation or death after just a short period of exposure. The company used equipment to measure radiation from a distance and was unable to ascertain the exact level because the device’s maximum reading is 10 sieverts per hour. While Tepco said the readings would not hinder its goal of stabilising the Fukushima reactors by January, experts warned that worker safety could be at risk if the operator prioritised hitting the deadline over radiation risks. “Radiation leakage at the plant may have been contained or slowed but it has not been sealed off completely. The utility is likely to continue finding these spots of high radiation,” said Kenji Sumita, a professor at Osaka University who specialises in nuclear engineering. “Considering this, recovery work at the plant should not be rushed to meet schedules and goals as that could put workers in harm’s way. We are past the immediate crisis phase and some delays should be permissible.” Workers at Daiichi are only allowed to be exposed to 250 millisieverts of radiation a year. Tepco, which provides power to Tokyo and neighbouring areas, said it had not detected a sharp rise in overall radiation levels at the compound. “The high dose was discovered in an area that doesn’t hamper recovery efforts at the plant,” Tepco spokesman Junichi Matsumoto told reporters on Tuesday. Although it is still investigating the matter, Tepco said the spots of high radiation could stem from debris left behind by emergency venting conducted days after the 11 March earthquake and tsunami that crippled the plant. Japan disaster Japan Nuclear power Energy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Barclays profits fall, hit by £1bn PPI bill

• Barclays profits down 33% to £2.6bn • 3,000 jobs to go this year • £2.3bn of profit came from Barclays Capital • Bob Diamond calls for regulatory clarity Barclays is preparing to cut 3,000 jobs during 2011, its chief executive admitted on Tuesday, as the bank suffered a 33% slump in first-half profits, dented by a £1bn provision for customers mis-sold payment protection insurance . The £2.6bn of pre-tax profits was slightly higher than the City had been expecting and continued to be driven by Barclays Capital, the investment bank. Bob Diamond, who took the helm at the start of the year to replace John Varley , said that the headcount had fallen 1,400 so far this year and that job cuts would accelerate in the second part of the year. He indicated that around 3,000 cuts were likely across the 155,000-strong workforce. HSBC on Monday admitted that it expected to make 30,000 job cuts over the next three years . Even though profits at BarCap are down from £3.4bn a year ago as a result of the turmoil in the financial markets caused by the eurozone and the US debt crisis, the division still generated £2.3bn of the total £2.6bn of profits. Diamond called for clarity on the wave of new regulations that the banking industry is braced for once Britain’s Independent Commission on Banking reports on 12 September. “A final regulatory outcome will provide a clearer backdrop against which we can judge how much we continue to invest in our business and in the broader promotion of economic growth, versus how much we retain in higher levels of capital, or distribute to shareholders by way of a dividend. Our current dividend policy in the meantime must remain conservative though we are mindful of the importance of progressive, and affordable, increases,” Diamond said. “We look forward to certainty post-12 September.” Shares in Barclays rose more than 2% in early trading, up 4.25p to 221.5p. The profits were helped by a 41% fall in the impairment charge and other credit provisions to £1.8bn but knocked by a previously announced £1bn provision for compensating customers mis-sold payment protection insurance. “It has clearly been a very difficult operating environment,” said Diamond. The chief executive has embarked on a cost-cutting programme to help the bank generate a return on equity of 13% by 2013. The former head of BarCap, he is edging towards that goal, reaching 9.1% in the first half from 6.9% a year earlier. The first-half figures showed that the Barclays Corporate arm will be hit by a £47m loss because of a £64m charge taken in anticipation of the sale of its Russian business . The bank also said it was meeting its targets under the Project Merlin deal with the government over lending to small businesses. “We are meeting our Project Merlin commitments and have extended £20bn of new lending to businesses in the UK in the first half. We are on track to lend at least £40bn for the year,” Diamond said. He added: “Our capital, liquidity and funding position is rock solid. We look forward to the finalisation of new banking regulations over the coming months. This will help us balance requirements to hold more capital and liquidity on the one hand, with the desire of shareholders for us to distribute higher dividends and with business demand for us to help support economic growth, on the other,” he said. The bank is paying a 1p dividend for the second quarter, as expected, taking the half year dividend to 2p. Barclays had reported first half profits of £3.9bn a year ago . Some £3.4bn of the total was generated by BarCap, which reported a trebling in profits over the period. It stressed that its crucial core Tier 1 ratio – a measure of its financial strength – has now doubled from 5.6% since the end of 2008 to 11%. Barclays Banking Project Merlin Bob Diamond Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Today Tucson congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) cast her first vote since she was critically injured in a January shooting. You'll recall that in the weeks that followed, the media bemoaned the incivility — supposedly predominantly conservative in nature — of the political debate which had allegedly created a climate of hate. But there appears to to be no firestorm over how, just last week, Arizona Daily Star cartoonist David Fitzsimmons fantasized about President Obama sending a SEAL team to assassinate Tea Party-friendly House Republicans. See the political cartoon below the page break or find it linked here:

Continue reading …
HOUSE passes Debt Ceiling Bill 269-161. Gabby Giffords Returns!

Click here to view this media So it looks like the debt ceiling kabuki is over. The only good news I see is that Gabby Giffords returned to Congress today and voted. The House of Representatives on Monday passed the landmark compromise to raise the debt ceiling and sharply cut spending, drawing a solid majority of the Republicans, along with a about half of the Democrats, to push through a package that was ultimately described by many as an unpalatable necessity. Passage came after weeks of brinksmanship and backroom dealing that left few satisfied in the more liberal or conservative wings of the House, but drew just enough from each party to put a compromise over the top in time, assuming the Senate goes along, to avert what might have become a calamitous default on the nation’s debt. The tally, which had mounted excruciatingly slowly until the final seconds, was 269-161. Then, to growing applause, Representative Gabrielle Giffords, Democrat of Arizona, who was recovering from an attack several months ago, cast her vote, and as if a dam had burst the votes poured in… read on

Continue reading …
Charities fight for survival as funding slashed across country

Anti-cuts campaign False Economy obtained data from 265 freedom-of-information responses from local councils More than 2,000 charities are being forced to close services and sack staff as local authorities slash their funding, or in some cases completely withdraw it, according to research published on Tuesday. The study – based on 265 freedom-of-information responses from local councils across England and obtained by the union-backed anti-cuts campaign False Economy – reveals the scale of the impact that cuts are having on the charitable sector. Birmingham city council has cut funding to the largest number of charities, with more than 190 organisations losing out, followed by the cross-council organisation London Councils, which has cut funding to 174 groups. Many charities will see their funding cut by half while others will lose entire budgets. The hardest hit include children’s and young-people charities, with more than 380 organisations hit. Another 150 disability, 142 elderly and more than 110 adult care charities are also affected. The research immediately raised questions about the role of charities as a cornerstone of the government’s ‘big society’. Brendan Barber, the general secretary of the TUC which sponsors False Economy, said: “The big society is looking more and more like a big con … These deep cuts to voluntary groups across the UK show that government claims that charities can replace direct services currently provided by central or local government are false.” False Economy says its survey shows more than £110m this year will disappear from charities’ bottom line although this analysis, the first attempt to map the extent of the cuts in England, does not include major cities such as Leeds and Manchester as well as some large shire counties such as Hampshire or Tory flagship boroughs like Westminster. These councils refused to hand over data on the grounds it would take too long to extract the information. The final figure is also likely to be far higher given that some large authorities have not yet finalised where the cuts will hit, and only charities or voluntary groups receiving a funding cut of at least 5% are listed in the research. The calculation includes cuts to charity’s grants and where they occur some increases to budgets. Acevo, the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, which represents 2,000 charity leaders in Britain, has warned previously that the sector could lose £750m this year alone if “central and local government passed on cuts proportionately”. Another £250m would be lost because of VAT increases and reductions in tax breaks. Peter Kyle, deputy director of Acevo, said that if ministers’ pledges of extra funding, outlined in last month’s public services white paper, were to materialise then there would be another £2bn for charities – enough to fill the gap left by the estimated £1bn shaved from their local government grants. “But charities are instead going to the wall because of the cuts and you cannot magic them back into existence again. It’s short-sighted and mindless.” Experts also questioned whether the charitable sector could cover for the sharp drop in funding for local government. Tony Travers of the London School of Economics pointed out that local authorities last year had to bear more than £4bn in cuts – amounting to an 8% drop in real terms: “Ministers have created a much bigger challenge in hoping to expand the voluntary and NGO sector in the name of the big society with the size of such cuts.” The government blamed councils for “being short sighted in their approach [and] failing to recognise the importance of the sector”. A spokesperson for the Department for Communities & Local Government said: “In their approach to budget setting, the best councils are showing that they understand that a strong, thriving voluntary sector is more important now than ever and could be the key to providing high quality, good value services to their residents. But this is not the case everywhere.” Sir Merrick Cockell, chairman of the Local Government Association, defended its decisions to cut budgets in a time of austerity. “The severity of cuts to council budgets means savings are having to be made across the board, and unfortunately funding to charities, voluntary organisations and community groups is not exempt.” Decisions to reduce financial support to the voluntary sector will never be taken lightly and local authorities have rightly carried out full and frank consultations before reducing funding to groups.”ENDS Charities Voluntary sector Volunteering Local government Economic policy TUC Trade unions Randeep Ramesh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

I post this to show you how disgusting and dishonest right wing media is. We’ve had plenty of posts on the debt ceiling debate spelling out our frustrations, but at least we’re honest about what is being said and how we feel. I’ve covered Hannity since 2004 because I always thought it is important for us to monitor what bile is being spewed onto our airwaves. Remember, it was never covered as extensively before C&L came along with Media Matters so there was never any push back on all the lies. We’ve had an definitive impact, but I have to admit I just can’t watch Hannity anymore. There’s a limit to my RWNM stamina. Lo and behold I dared to step back into that cauldron of lies and I tell you, I’ll leave him to others on our site. Hannity is so vile that around the 3:42 mark of this video, Juan Williams calls him “myopic” and a “‘liar.” Even Juan Williams couldn’t contain himself any longer and he’s getting paid by Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes. Williams: “You Are So Myopic. … You Are Not Honest”

Continue reading …
Greece begins €50bn privatisation drive

Greek officials begin appointing advisers for fire-sale of state assets intended to raise €50bn by 2015 The starting gun for one of the biggest fire-sales in western history was fired as Greek officials began appointing advisers for the country’s ambitious privatisation drive. “Our target is clear, and it is to generate €1.7bn from privatisations by the end of September and €5bn by the end of the year,” said the finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos. After securing a second aid package to prop up an economy now dependent on international handouts to pay public wages and pensions, Athens has moved with record speed to divest itself of state assets ranging from prime real estate to loss-making companies. By any measure it is a gargantuan task. At stake is Greece’s €350bn debt, which before the EU and IMF agreed to bailout the country again was predicted to peak at 172% of GDP next year. The socialist government says it aims to raise €50bn through the campaign by 2015. Enough, it is hoped, to not only make a dent in the debt but send a convincing message to the markets that have pummelled Athens since the onset of the crisis 18 months ago. The prime minister, George Papandreou, has cancelled his summer holidays to accelerate the dismantling of a sector that his father Andreas – Greece’s fiery socialist premier in the 1980s – did much to foster. International lenders have warned that if there no progress with privatisations they will withhold the next tranche of aid in September. “In more ways than one Papandreou is paying for the sins of his father,” said Nikos Dimou, author of the bestselling book The Misfortune of Being Greek. “It was Andreas, after all, who did more than anyone else to run Greece into debt.” The appearance of For Sale and For Rent signs on everything from former Olympic venues to island locales, casinos, marinas and airports, has been met with unexpected acceptance by Greeks long weaned on state largesse. A growing majority appears to agree it is the only way of arresting soaring unemployment by attracting foreign investment. Experts estimate Athens could own around €300bn worth of state property, almost as much as the total Greek debt. “There has definitely been a shift in mood,” said Stefanos Manos, a former national economy minister in a centre-right government. “But that could easily change. It is very clear that the government is only doing this under great duress from [our] international creditors,” he said. “With timetables being so pressing, I worry that the whole process is very ill-prepared. If it there is not enough transparency we may end up like Russia, where only a cast of oligarchs end up benefiting.” With the privatisation drive now seen as crucial to reviving economic growth, the government has actively courted countries with big sovereign wealth funds to invest in Greece. Last week Europe’s paymaster, Germany, signalled it was interested in snapping up assets in the energy and tourism sectors. At home tycoons who control large sectors of the media have also started jockeying for position in what one commentator called the “beginning of a civil war” to buy stakes in state companies. “It is going to be a minefield for the government,” said political analyst Giorgos Kyrtsos. “The troika [of lenders] are not well-versed in Greek reality. The programme is overly ambitious.” After years of resisting privatisations, the breakneck speed at which Athens has agreed to conduct the sales – nearly one every 15 days – has raised fears that state jewels will be sold at rock-bottom prices. “In a buyer’s market our biggest concern is that this entire process will only serve to benefit the forces of capitalism and do nothing to create development,” said Yiannis Panagopoulos, president of the Confederation of Greek Workers, the country’s biggest labour grouping. “We will strongly oppose the sale of any sector in which the government has a strategic interest … there will be huge resistance if it tries to sell the electricity company, the water board, our post office or ports, sectors that are vital to developing this country.” Greece Europe European debt crisis Global economy Economics Helena Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
MSNBC’s Alter and Bashir Agree: ‘We’d Be in a Depression Now if There Had Been a Balanced Budget Amendment in 2009′

On Monday's “Martin Bashir,” MSNBC analyst Jonathan Alter proclaimed that America would “be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009.” Bashir, concurring with the former Newsweek editor, added, “Indeed.” Reacting to Rep. John Boehner's (R-Ohio) press conference about the debt-ceiling deal , Alter and Bashir mocked the speaker's suggestion that a balanced budget amendment is needed to “handcuff” Congress. [Video will be posted soon] “Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression,” groused Alter, a former Newsweek editor. “By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts to try to end that near depression.” Alter's implicit assumption that President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus package was successful belies a 9.2 percent unemployment rate, an anemic housing market, and public opinion polls showing Americans think the country has been, and continues to be, on the wrong track . Not only that, but a balanced budget amendment does not preclude the possibility of injecting stimulus in times of economic distress, but rather, it forces Congress to prioritize spending to live within its means. It's not surprising that Alter would employ hyperbolic language to denigrate Republican proposals. After all, Alter told MSNBC's Cenk Uygur in April that in supporting the Ryan plan, the GOP voted to ” throw granny into the snow .” A transcript of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Martin Bashir August 1, 2011 3:45 p.m. Eastern LUKE RUSSERT, NBC congressional correspondent: The most interesting thing that he said though, was when he spoke at length about a balanced budget amendment. MARTIN BASHIR: Indeed. RUSSERT: That is a direct attempt to cater to the Tea Party part of his conference, essentially saying hey look, I know this is the framework of your Cut, Cap, and Balance that we tried to pass a couple weeks ago. The idea of this balanced budget amendment, saying this is the best chance I've had for it in the 20 years I've been here to try and garner support for it, that is trying to say to these Tea Party folks, hey come on board. If we extend this plan, albeit it's not perfect, but we'll have a great opportunity to try to pass a balanced budget amendment down the line. BASHIR: Indeed. Speaker Boehner actually said we would never have gotten into this mess in the first place had we had a balanced budget amendment. (Laughter) RUSSERT: Correct. That's the code word for the Tea Party, this balanced budget amendment. BASHIR: Jonathan Alter, you were laughing at that. JONATHAN ALTER: Yeah, I mean, I'm laughing at that because let's say we'd had a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in early 2009 when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs a month and headed for another Great Depression. By Speaker Boehner's terms, we wouldn't have had any government efforts – BASHIR: Stimulus, nothing. ALTER: To try to end that near depression. Does he really think the country would have been better off if the Congress had been handcuffed and unable to take any measures to fight a coming depression? I think we'd be in a depression now if there had been a balanced budget amendment in 2009. BASHIR: Indeed. Jonathan Alter, Luke Russert, and Joy Ann Reid, thanks so much for joining us. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Continue reading …
How should journalists talk to survivors of the attacks in Norway? | Helen Pidd

They are still too shocked to speak. I kept my distance but should I even be in their town? ‘I spoke to Roald this morning, and he is sorry, but he can’t talk to you,” said Arne Nysted, the deputy mayor of Bardu, a small town a few hundred kilometres north of the Arctic Circle, when I turned up there on Thursday. “He thought he was doing the right thing by agreeing to talk to Norwegian TV and didn’t realise that by speaking out, he would not be asked to do just one interview but very many, from newspapers and television from all over the world. Now he needs peace.” In Norway, most people’s landlines – and even mobiles – are listed in the phone book. So it was easy for reporters to directly contact Roald Linaker, the army chaplain at Bardu’s military base, to ask him to discuss his son Gunnar, the 23-year-old “calm, big teddy bear with lots of humour and lots of love”, who was one of 69 people murdered by Anders Behring Breivik on Utøya island on 22 July . That afternoon, Roald had received a phone call from his son. “Dad, Dad, someone is shooting,” said Gunnar. Unlike many of the other young people at the Labour party’s annual youth summer camp, Gunnar knew exactly what a gun sounded like. Living so close to Norway’s largest garrison, he could even tell the difference between a weapon being fired manually and on automatic. Many of his friends on Utøya thought they were hearing fireworks when Breivik unleashed his first few rounds. Gunnar knew differently. Later, his 17-year-old sister Hanne said he saved the lives of her and others by shielding them from Breivik’s bullets and telling them to run. He paid the ultimate price. Journalists, wherever possible, piece together a story from primary sources – people who were there when something happened. But what to do when the witnesses won’t talk to you? After I arrived, a nurse on Bardu’s crisis team had gently asked me not to approach Hanne or the three other young women from the town who had survived the atrocities. “It is too soon,” she said. “I hope you understand that.” Roald had asked for privacy. The parents of Anders Kristiansen, the 18-year-old local boy who had not been seen since the attack, were down in Oslo, waiting for police to confirm the grim news. When reporting a death, I have a few self-imposed rules. If I am specifically told to leave the families alone, I won’t go near them. If the police liaison officer hasn’t issued a warning, I will take a deep breath and knock on the parents’ door once, telling myself that sometimes people want to talk about those they have lost. It doesn’t feel good. If they say they don’t want to talk, I won’t return. Sometimes I put a sympathy card through their letterbox with my phone number so that they can call me later “if you feel able”. They very rarely do. I had decided to make the 1,500km plane journey from Oslo to Bardu late on Wednesday night. The idea was to go to a small community that had suffered disproportionately in relation to its population. Bardu, a municipality in the huge Arctic county of Troms, has just under 4,000 people scattered within its tree-covered borders. Of the seven young people it sent to Utøya, two returned in body bags, two came back with limbs in plaster and three with memories that will haunt them for the rest of their lives. Of course I wanted to talk to the survivors. I wasn’t the only one. Sitting on a picnic table by the town’s makeshift shrine under a surprisingly brutal Arctic sun, I met another journalist who had been hanging around for days in the hope of speaking to one of the girls Breivik failed to kill. If he couldn’t speak to a victim, there was no story, he said. It would be a waste of time and money. As we sat there, a car pulled up and out hobbled a young woman with one foot and arm in bandages: it was one of the survivors. I recognised her from a newspaper picture taken before she went to the island – Anders Kristiansen, smiling a huge grin, had his arm slung across her shoulder. Now, another young man put his arm around her, supporting her as she hopped a few metres to the town’s millennium memorial, which had become a shrine to the dead. She lay flowers and I stayed put. On Thursday evening, I couldn’t sleep. I’d stayed up late writing my dispatch for Saturday’s paper without speaking to a victim or the families of the dead, relying instead on testimony from the town’s priest, the deputy mayor and friends of those never to return. At 1am it was still light outside, so I left my hotel and got in my hire car, passing the Bible verse the owner had written on the whiteboard outside: Psalm 23, The Lord Is My Shepherd. Had I wasted the Guardian’s time and money? Should I have knocked on those doors, I wondered, as I drove past the Beware of Elk sign towards the Ice Peak mountains. I thought of the time I went to Pontardawe the day a young couple from a small village had been murdered on their honeymoon in Antigua. Of driving through Cumbria, trying to find people who saw Derrick Bird kill 12 people in June 2010. Of being on an estate in Bradford, asking the neighbours of a woman who worked as a prostitute how they felt after her remains had been fished out of a nearby river. Should I have been there? Should I be here? I didn’t have an answer. Norway Anders Behring Breivik Helen Pidd guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Jim Devine freed from jail after 4 months

Former Labour MP jailed for 16 months for expenses fraud in March is released after serving a quarter of his sentence Jim Devine, the former Labour MP jailed for 16 months in March for expenses fraud has been released after serving a quarter of his sentence. Devine was freed early, from Standford Hill Prison in Kent, under the home detention scheme. He will remain tagged and spend the last eight months of his sentence on probation. Devine, who had been MP for Livingston, was found guilty of a gross breach of trust for claiming over £8,000 in parliamentary expenses, some for cleaning and stationery. The trial judge Mr Justice Saunders said Devine had been “lying in significant parts of the evidence he gave”. But critics saidhis release would do little for confidence in the criminal justice system. Emma Boon, from The TaxPayers’ Alliance, said the early release “makes his sentence look like a hollow gesture and will do nothing to help restore public faith in parliament”. Devine, a former psychiatric nurse and union organiser, has since been declared bankrupt. He is the third former MP jailed over the parliamentary expenses scandal to be released, following Eric Illsley and David Chaytor. A fourth former MP, Elliot Morley, a one-time climate change minister, remains in prison, along with Conservative peers Lord Taylor and Lord Hanningfield. Illsley, 56, who was jailed for 12 months in February after pleading guilty to £14,000 in expenses fraud, was released in May after three months behind bars. Chaytor, 61, served four-and-a-half months of his 18-month sentence after falsely claiming over £22,000 of taxpayers’ money. Devine was election agent to Robin Cook, the former foreign secretary and one of the Labour party’s leading thinkers. Devine was best man at Cook’s wedding to second wife Gaynor and he then went on to succeed him as MP for Livingston when the Cook died from a heart attack in August 2005. Devine used his maiden speech in the Commons to pay tribute to the Labour politician as “the outstanding parliamentarian of his generation” and admitted he had “big shoes to fill”. Devine had told his Southwark crown court trial that he was acting on advice given with a “nod and a wink” by a fellow MP in a House of Commons bar but his defence was rejected by the jury. MPs’ expenses Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …