Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 221)
Chris Matthews Slams Matt Kibbe for His ‘Tea Party’ Being Incapable of Governing

Click here to view this media I think Chris Matthews has finally had a belly-full of these TeaBirchers who’ve been taking the government hostage trying to get their balanced budget jammed through the legislature or at least force all of them to vote on it. They’ve been claiming — as FreedomWorks’ Matt Kibbe did here — that it would be acceptable to take us past the August 3rd deadline on default. Matthews railed on Kibbe for pretending that would be in any way a responsible way for members of Congress to act and blasted Kibbe and the so-called “tea party” House members that are beholden to his group and others as incapable of governing. After watching the last few interviews Matthews has had with tea partiers, I think Matthews (like a lot of us) is genuinely angry and tired of these people’s games. Tried of them threatening to burn the whole place down if they don’t get their way. Sadly unlike his cohort Rachel Maddow, he still paints them as being remotely grass roots instead of pointing out who’s funding them as Rachel has . He also still allows his viewers the impression that this is some genuine third party movement instead of a Republican re-branding effort to try to distance themselves from George W. Bush.

Continue reading …
Frank Rich: Murdoch and O’Reilly are ‘Thugs’

Click here to view this media New York magazine writer Frank Rich explained Monday that Rupert Murdoch’s unethical business practices were not limited to Britain. “I think that we’re deluding ourselves if we think the whole Murdoch culture has not spread to America,” Rich told HLN’s Joy Behar. “We’re reading all this sort of exotic stuff about having British police on the payroll. Bernie Kerik was on the Murdoch payroll. He had a huge advance from Harper Collins. And you know, the piece I’ve written in New York that’s out today, I talk about the bullying things that they do. It’s not just about politics. It’s not just about Fox being right-wing. It’s about them going after people who are personal enemies, Bill O’Reilly having producers stalk people on the street.” “Liberals love to criticize Fox because it’s not fair and balanced and all that. They like to criticize the Post because it’s very right wing. Forget about the politics. This is about power and money, punishing enemies that they don’t like, for reasons that could be personal or business, not just political.” “They’re thugs,” Behar remarked. “Yes,” Rich agreed. “It’s thuggery. And I think this scandal is going to play out like Watergate for a couple of years.”

Continue reading …
Duncan Bannatyne drops £50k reward for ‘breaking arms’ of blackmailer

Dragons’ Den star calls in police and deletes tweets appearing to solicit violence after Russian threatens to harm daughter The Dragons’ Den star Duncan Bannatyne has been forced to delete tweets after offering a £50,000 reward for anyone who broke the arms of a man who used Twitter to threaten his daughter. Someone going by the name of Yuri Vasilyev tweeted Bannatyne three days ago, saying: “I’m looking for a £35,000 investment to stop us hurting your Hollie Bannatyne. We will bring hurt and pain into your life. We are watching her. She is very attractive. Want photos?” After revealing that police had been informed of the threat, Bannatyne told his 371,653 Twitter followers: “I offer £25,000 reward for the capture of the coward who calls himself @YuriVasilyev_ Double if his arms are broken first.” He added: “I am serious btw [by the way]. I think he is in Moscow.” Bannatyne’s strategy appears to echo the plot of the film Ransom , in which a millionaire, played by Mel Gibson, puts out a bounty on the criminals who have kidnapped his son. A number of Twitter users were quick to take Bannatyne to task for appearing to solicit violence. “Just read it thought it was a bit irresponsible of @DuncanBannatyne. Some nutter will take it seriously,” wrote one . Bannatyne replied: ” Good I want you to. ” Another user went further , asking: “You are seriously trying to pay someone, to break someone’s arms, on an incredibly public forum? Fair enough … Just to clarify, you 100% want everyone to know you are seriously doing this. Despite it being illegal?” The criticism appeared to bring about a change of heart, and Bannatyne deleted the offending tweets and amended his offer to ” £30,000 reward for info leading to his arrest “. However, he kept up the pressure, telling his followers he had tracked the alleged criminal to an internet cafe in Moscow. “@YuriVasilyev_ My people are getting closer to you every minute, run and hide you little coward in Moscow,” he tweeted . ” Go home to your mum and cry we are closing in on you little boy.” The saga was picked up across Twitter, leading parody – ” I offer £25 for the capture of my 3-year-old. Double if her toenails are clipped ” – and more serious points. Many users made comparisons with the Twitter joke trial in which Paul Chambers was convicted of “menace” for threatening to blow up Robin Hood airport in a humorous tweet. “I hope Bannatyne doesn’t threaten to blow Russian chap sky high if there’s any snow in Moscow. Then he’ll be in trouble,” wrote David Allen Green , the New Statesman’s legal correspondent who also represents Chambers. Bannatyne’s agent confirmed that the police had been informed. On Tuesday afternoon, Bannatyne released a statement saying: “My family is well protected but I take any threat to them very seriously and will do all I can to ensure the person or people involved are caught.” The entrepreneur, author and philanthropist made no mention of the deleted tweets. Dragons’ Den Twitter Internet Crime Sam Jones guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Moscow Olympics bear now caged in parked bus in St Petersburg

Katya, a bear which performed at Games, is kept in appalling conditions in car park along with other retired circus animals A 36-year-old bear which performed during the 1980 Moscow Olympics has been kept for the past two years in a rusty old bus on the outskirts of St Petersburg. Animal rights activists say the bear and other retired circus animals receive only minimal care in cramped and stinking cages. Katya the bear was a long-time star of the St Petersburg State Circus on Fontanka, where night after night it and another bear rode motorcycles around the ring. During the 1980 Games, the bears performed at a ceremony opening the football competition in St Petersburg, then called Leningrad. Katya also appeared in two films in the 1980s. Since its retirement in 2009, Katya and the painted bus on which it once toured with the circus have not left a car park near a busy road. The aging bear spends the hours jumping up and down in its cage and trying to crack the rusty metal railings with its chipped and yellowed teeth. Dozens of other retired circus animals also live in the cramped cages inside the bus and a minivan parked nearby. Some occasionally are taken out to accompany photographers to the centre of town to have their pictures taken with children and tourists. Others never get washed or examined by veterinarians, animal rights activists say. “They can’t move normally and start going crazy,” said Zoya Afanasyeva of the Vita animal rights group, as she stood by Katya’s sweltering bus on a hot summer day. “Apparently they are being taken care of, but not more often than once a day, and this care is perfunctory because the smell here in the parking lot is unbearable.” Klava the bear shares a small cage with Pasha the boar. Birds with atrophied muscles live next to cats that do not meow and stare straight ahead with pus-covered eyes. The circus director, Viktor Savrasov, said the animals are cared for and Katya’s fate would have been worse if her trainer had agreed to have the bear put to sleep. “Whatever happened, she did not leave her,” he said of retired trainer Natalya Arkhipova, who still visits to feed Katya. Animal rights activists have long urged Russia’s government to strengthen animal protection laws. Animal welfare Russia Animals Circus Europe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Stepping Hill nurse accused over patient deaths suspended for 18 months

Nursing council orders suspension of Rebecca Leighton to protect profession’s reputation after ‘very serious allegations’ A hospital nurse facing six charges over the unexplained deaths of patients has been suspended for 18 months by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). Rebecca Leighton, 27, who worked at Stepping Hill hospital in Hazel Grove, Stockport, was arrested last month. She is alleged to have contaminated intravenous saline solution with insulin. The NMC panel imposed the maximum 18-month interim suspension of her registration at a hearing in London on Tuesday. Neither Leighton, who has been remanded in custody, nor her solicitor attended the hearing. The panel said the contamination of intravenous fluids with insulin may have contributed to the deaths of several patients at Stepping Hill. Leighton faces six counts of causing damage with intent to endanger life or being reckless to whether life is endangered and one charge of theft of medicine. Panel chairman John Unsworth said: “The panel consider that these are very serious allegations which strike at the heart of the principle that patients should be able to trust nurses to safeguard their health and wellbeing and do nothing which would endanger their safety. “If the alleged behaviour was to be repeated there would be a real risk of significant harm to patients because of hypoglycaemia. For this reason the panel considers that some from of order is necessary for protection of the public.” An order was also judged to be in the public interest to prevent any further damage to the reputation of the nursing profession and to safeguard the public’s confidence in the NMC and the regulatory process. The 18-month order allows the criminal proceedings to be concluded and the NMC to carry out its own investigation into the allegations. On Monday, it emerged that hundreds of people are being interviewed as part of a wide-ranging investigation into the Stepping Hill deaths. Leighton appeared at Manchester crown court via videolink from prison. She spoke only to confirm her name. Police are investigating claims the insulin-tainted saline caused sudden and inexplicable drops in patients’ blood sugar levels. The inquiry into events at the hospital is likely to be lengthy and detailed, with hundreds of patient records being scrutinised. A provisional trial date has been set for 28 February next year and Leighton will appear before the court on 17 October for a plea and case management hearing. At Monday’s court hearing, Peter Wright, QC, prosecuting, said detectives were arranging to interview several hundred patients and staff. He said 600 exhibits are also being examined along with many documents recovered from the hospital, including patient records. This would take months. He added that toxicology and pathology results were still to be released. Wright was part of the prosecution team in the case of serial killer GP Harold Shipman 11 years ago. The Stepping Hill case centres on the suspicious deaths last month of Tracey Arden, 44, Arnold Lancaster, 71, Derek Weaver, 83, and Vera Pearson, 84. Crime Nursing Health Helen Carter guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Mitch McConnell Vows to Continue Holding Debt Ceiling Hostage in the Future

Click here to view this media He forgot to add, until we elect another Republican president. From Think Progress — Mitch McConnell Vows To Hold Debt Ceiling Hostage In The Future: ‘We’ll Be Doing It All Over’ : While a deal has been struck to raise the debt ceiling for now, many progressives have worried that the damaged has been already been done in that Republicans learned that “ raw extortion works and carries no political cost,” as the New York Times’ Paul Krugman wrote today. “Irresponsible brinksmanship” is now “ a proven effective negotiating tactic ,” ThinkProgress’s Matt Yglesias noted. This afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) confirmed this fear when he told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto that Republicans will hold the debt ceiling hostage in the future, saying this debate “set the template for the future”: MCCONNELL: It set the template for the future . In the future, Neil, no president — in the near future, maybe in the distant future — is going to be able to get the debt ceiling increased without a re-ignition of the same discussion of how do we cut spending and get America headed in the right direction. I expect the next president, whoever that is, is going to be asking us to raise the debt ceiling again in 2013, so we’ll be doing it all over . As they noted, progressives should be pushing to repeal the debt ceiling all together. And Dave Dayden reminded us today just who started this hostage taking in the first place — Blue Dog Democrats and Lieberman in the United States Senate back in 2009 — The Hidden History of the Debt Limit Hijack: Democrats Started It . As Dave noted, it was the usual suspects, ConservaDems along with some Republicans and “Independent” Joe Lieberman who used the debt ceiling to leverage getting that deficit commission set up: But before Tuesday’s hearing was over, Sens. Conrad, Gregg, Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) publicly vowed to vote against raising the debt ceiling if a budget reform commission bill doesn’t come along with it. I don’t know if it’s fair to say that Republicans would not have pulled this recent hostage taking if that had not happened a few years ago, but it certainly opened the door for it. Mitch McConnell later said in this same interview that if Republicans aren’t happy with this plan, they should be trying to get more Republicans elected so they can continue to completely dismantle all of our social safety nets. I think liberals had better take the same message. It’s ridiculous to think that anyone is going to mount a serious primary challenge to President Obama, but we sure as hell need to be forcing him to deal with some better congressional members and vote more of these ConservaDems and Blue Dogs out of office. As McConnell noted, the other side is never going to give up. If we throw up our hands up in disgust, we get what we deserve. We all need to be taking a page from Wisconsin right now, putting our collective anger to some good use. One way to do that is to go on over and support the Blue America PAC and help get some progressives elected to office in districts where they’re not getting much help from the DCCC or the DSCC. And one last note, McConnell vowed that when the members of this commission they’re going to set up are appointed, Republicans are going to make sure whoever they appoint to it will never agree to any tax increases. Is anyone surprised? I’m not. Time to start getting members of the Senate to vow to put a hold on or filibuster any bill that extends the Bush tax cuts again, no matter what hostage taking they resort to this time around.

Continue reading …
Vince Cable: government plans to block illegal filesharing sites unworkable

Business secretary to intervene in Digital Economy Act debate in speech and expected to overhaul restrictive rules on file copying Vince Cable, the business secretary, will say on Wednesday that government plans to block illegal filesharing websites under the controversial Digital Economy Act are in effect unworkable. Outlining the government’s response to the Hargreaves report on the future of UK copyright law, Cable is also expected to announce legislation to sweep away restrictive rules on file copying and parody works. In a speech at the British Library on Wednesday, the Liberal Democrat minister will outline the next steps for the introduction of the delayed Digital Economy Act. Cable will row back on one of the act’s most contentious measures – introducing legislation to block access to copyright-infringing websites – and instead say that the existing Copyrights, Design and Patents Act is powerful enough. That follows last week’s landmark high court ruling, which forced BT to cut off access to Newzbin2, a site found to be infringing copyright “on a grand scale”. Cable’s intervention comes as ministers struggle to implement anti-piracy measures outlined by the Digital Economy Act rushed through by the Labour party at the end of its time in office. The first cease-and-desist warning letters to be sent to Britons accused of illegal filesharing are now not due until the second half of 2012 – more than a year later than originally planned. A series of legal challenges have meant meant that cutting off the internet connections of serial pirates is unlikely to begin until 2013 at the earliest. Cable is also expected to announce a “scoping review” into the viability of a setting up a digital copyright exchange, one of the key proposals of the Hargreaves report published in May – in effect kicking the idea into the long grass. The rights exchange, which would effectively be a one-stop shop to make lawful use of copyrighted material easier, received “serious pushback” from media companies, according to one industry source. Film and music companies and broadcasters are understood to have raised a number of issues about the proposed exchange, including fears that it may contravene various European regulations by forcing all rights holders to participate. One industry source said that if it was a full “stock exchange” trading platform it may not be generate as much revenue as selling rights directly. The government is anticipated to legislate to sweep away many of the UK’s archaic intellectual property restrictions that make it technically illegal to transfer content from CDs or DVDs to other formats, such as iPods. The reforms will also make it legal for Britons to burn copies of music and video files for family members to use, and give legal protection to spoof works. Cable has previously said that private copying is carried out by millions of people who are “astonished” that it is technically illegal. He said: “We need to bring copyright into line with people’s expectations and update it for the modern digital world. This will free up innovative British businesses to develop new consumer technology and help boost economic growth.” The Lib Dem MP is expected to outline further changes to the DEA, including how costs are aportioned between rights holders and ISPs. The judicial review ruled in April that ISPs should not foot the bill of maintaining an appeals body . Ed Vaizey, the communications minister, is understood to have set a date of mid-September to get ISPs and rights holders to another roundtable meeting aimed at curbing infringing sites voluntarily. However, many rights holders are dismayed at the delays in implementing the Digital Economy Act. “What we would very much like is the government to get on drafting and writing the code that goes with the DEA and to fast-track the legal process so it doesn’t take hundreds of thousands of pounds and a long time to sort these things out,” said Lavinia Carey, director general of the British Video Association. Filesharing Internet Vince Cable Computing Digital Economy Act Piracy Digital media Mark Sweney Josh Halliday guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Sharon Shoesmith unfair dismissal ruling backed by supreme court

Baby P case judicial review application fails leaving sacked children’s services chief in line for £500,000 compensation The supreme court has rejected applications by the Department for Education and Haringey council to challenge a landmark ruling that Sharon Shoesmith was unfairly sacked following the death of Baby P. The appeal court concluded in May that Shoesmith’s dismissal by the former children’s secretary Ed Balls was “intrinsically unfair and unlawful” – a judgment that has now been upheld by the highest court in the land and leaves the former director of children’s services at Haringey council potentially in line for compensation of more than £500,000. The education department and the north London borough had sought permission to attempt to overturn the appeal court ruling, with the government arguing it must uphold the principle that ministers – and not the courts, through judicial review – should be responsible for their decisions. A spokesman for the supreme court said the applications for leave to appeal had been refused. The Department for Education saidit was “very disappointed to hear that permission for leave to appeal to the supreme court has not been granted. The government still believes it was right in principle for Sharon Shoesmith to be removed from her post as director of children’s services. “We believe that the supreme court should have heard this case as we believe there are questions of constitutional importance involved, beyond the specific question about whether Ed Balls should have had a meeting with Shoesmith before she was removed from her post.” Shoesmith, who earned £133,000 a year as an employee of Haringey council, is now liable for pay and pension contributions dating back to her dismissal in December 2008. Some estimates put the compensation and legal costs in the two-year case at more than £1m – a sum that would be paid by the council and the government. Shoesmith was sacked without compensation after Ofsted published a damning report into the death of 17-month-old Baby P – since named as Peter Connelly – exposing failings in her department. Balls moved swiftly to remove Shoesmith but her lawyers argued that she had been the victim of “a flagrant breach of natural justice” and that she was driven from her post by a media witch-hunt and political pressure. The appeal judges found that Balls and Haringey acted too hastily and were “procedurally unfair” because Shoesmith was not given a proper chance to put her case. They said politicians could not ignore elementary fairness when dealing with public servants at the centre of controversy, even when they felt they were acting legitimately in the public interest. Wednesday is the fourth anniversary of Baby Peter’s death. He died in Tottenham, north London, on 3 August 2007 at the hands of his mother, Tracey Connelly, her lover Steven Barker and their lodger, Barker’s brother Jason Owen. He had more than 50 injuries despite being on Haringey’s at-risk register and receiving 60 visits from social workers, police and health professionals over the final eight months of his life. A series of reviews identified missed opportunities when officials could have saved his life if they had acted properly on the warning signs. Shoesmith is believed to be backing a campaign to win back the jobs of four other social workers who were also dismissed. Baby P Child protection Children Randeep Ramesh guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Bill O’Reilly Blames Left for Entire Federal Debt

Click here to view this media Bill O’Reilly is trying to play the only adult in Republican politics so his analysis of the new Debt Ceiling bill is to forget eight years of George Bush, who’s policies took a federal surplus into his presidency and turned it into massive debt. He conveniently forgets about the Bush tax cuts, unpaid wars, unfunded Medicare Part D and blames out of control Liberal policies, regulations and government spending for causing all our economic problems. In his Talking Points Memo segment which guides his entire show, he only blames Liberals for our economic problems. No mention of the corruption of Wall Street that led to the TARP bailout born out of the mortgage meltdown crisis, except of course blaming that on Barney Frank. He does have a talent for making right wing propaganda seem almost believable to his flock. (Transcript wasn’t available at the time of the post) BillO does make the case that the government needs to raise revenues which Grover Norquist would disapprove of, but the way he goes about it is to propose the absurd flat tax scheme that shields the rich and calls for a regressive national sales tax that will only hurt 98% of the the American population. See, adding a tax on basic goods is throwing down more taxation on the working class of Americans that can ill afford it. And his defense of it was that since drug dealers weren’t paying any taxes we’d get them there to reduce the deficit . Insanity, I know. On the Flat Tax, which is class warfare that benefits the rich as usual—economist Holley Ulbrich writes: The attraction of simplicity hides a big change in the distribution of tax obligations among the poor, the middle class, and the rich. When think tanks like Cato and Heritage support changes that redistribute the tax burden in that way, they usually warn us of the evils of class warfare. But the proposed flat tax is, in fact, class warfare—yet another attempt to reduce the tax obligations of higher-income households in exchange for the unenforceable hope or promise that they might use the money to invest and create jobs, maybe even jobs in the United States. Two considerations should give us pause before jumping on the flat-tax bandwagon. The first is the disruptive effect of eliminating deductions, credits and exclusions that benefit the middle class as well as the rich and that play important roles in our lives—pension contributions, employer-provided healthcare, and deductions for mortgage interest, property taxes, and charitable contributions that support everything from soup kitchens to education to the arts. Second is the role of our mildly progressive federal income tax in offsetting regressive taxes elsewhere in the system. Second, there’s no concealing that the flat tax would radically redistribute the tax burden. Adam Smith, to whom economists always turn to for economic wisdom, observed, “It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.” The current U.S. tax system consists mainly of taxes on income (personal and corporate), payroll (Social Security), sales, and property. In 2007, these taxes provided 92 percent of federal income and 51 percent of state and local government income. Sales taxes are regressive—they take a higher share of low incomes than higher incomes. Robert McIntyre wrote about this shame in 1995 and it creepily applies to today. There is little or no disagreement among serious analysts that replacing the current, progressive income tax with a flat-rate tax would dramatically shift the tax burden away from the wealthy–and onto the middle class and the poor. You’ll notice that Bill O’Reilly bashes only Liberals in his screed. What a shock. A national sales tax will never happen, but I believe you’ll hear more talk coming from Republicans on the flat tax as the election nears because it’s an easy phrase to sell.

Continue reading …
China extends surveillance into supermarkets, cinemas and classrooms

Estimated 10m-plus surveillance cameras were installed in China last year, prompting human rights concerns Beijing police have ordered supermarkets and shopping malls to install high-definition security cameras, as China continues its huge expansion in monitoring technology. The country has added millions of surveillance cameras over the last five years, part of a broader increase in domestic security spending. In May, Shanghai announced that a team of 4,000 monitor its surveillance feeds to ensure round-the-clock coverage. The south-western municipality of Chongqing has announced plans to add 200,000 cameras by 2014 because “310,000 digital eyes are not enough”. Urumqi, which saw vicious ethnic violence in 2009, installed 17,000 high-definition, riot-proof cameras last year to ensure “seamless” surveillance. Fast-developing Inner Mongolia plans to have 400,000 units by 2012. In the city of Changsha, the Furong district alone reportedly has 40,000 – one for every 10 inhabitants. There are cameras on streets and in stores, in university classrooms and outside the doors of dissidents. In March, Beijing roused disquiet in the arts world when it mooted plans to spend 5.57m yuan on cameras to monitor performances in venues such as cinemas and theatres . China is hardly unique: Britain has arguably led the world in the use of surveillance cameras. But China has embraced them with particular enthusiasm. IMS Research, an electronics-focused consultancy, has predicted annual growth of more than 20% in China between last year and 2014, and less then 10% elsewhere. Bo Zhang, senior research analyst at IMS, believes that more than 10m cameras were installed in China in 2010. The company estimates that spending reached $680m last year, with the total market – including related systems – hitting a value of $1.7bn. Much of that is in the private sector, but Beijing’s initiative – targeting theft and food poisoning, say police – shows how officials are increasingly mandating companies to install cameras and link up private networks with official ones. Authorities are also investing heavily in new public projects. While some areas have gone much further than others, the national Safe City security plan aims to cover urban China with large networks. Internal security spending has soared to almost 625bn yuan this year, more than the country’s official military budget. Monitoring measures range from reinvigorating the neighbourhood committees that watch the comings and goings of residents to tightening internet controls. China’s domestic security chief has also called for the creation of an advanced database covering every citizen to improve “social management”. Linked to individuals’ identity cards, it would include details such as tax records and educational history. Nicholas Bequelin, Asia researcher for Human Rights Watch, said: “Whereas surveillance cameras are problematic even in democratic societies, there are important counterweights, such as independent courts, privacy statutes, rules about how long the information can be kept and through what legal procedures it can be accessed, as well as independent media and NGO watchdogs. “None of these safeguards exist in China, raising the very real prospect of an Orwellian society – one in which citizens are monitored in permanence, including in their private life.” Although much of the imagery may not be watched in real time, it can be stored for later retrieval. Officials are also seeking ways to automate the analysis of data. Using higher quality cameras paves the way for increasingly sophisticated analysis and linking of the information. Xue Junling, a project manager with Shenzhen Xinghuo Electronic Engineering, says facial recognition was already being used at key points such as big sports stadiums and border checkpoints, although some experts dispute its effectiveness. Many see nothing wrong with the rapid expansion in surveillance cameras, particularly given official claims for their success in cutting crime. Shanghai police said video monitoring helped them to catch 6,000 suspects last year. “If the purpose is for the public security of society, personal rights have to give way to public rights,” said Prof Fu Dingsheng, of the East China University of Political Science and Law, although he added that better safeguards were needed to ensure systems were not abused. Others say the expansion of monitoring is intended not just to cut crime but to systematically reduce the space for dissent. “When dissidents are released from prison or labour camp they often find the surveillance cameras are pointing directing into their homes. That’s something I have heard of a lot in the last couple of years,” said Wang Songlian, of the Chinese Human Rights Defenders Network. The artist Ai Weiwei, who was detained for two months this year, produced a marble sculpture titled Surveillance Camera, mimicking the machines posted outside his studio. The Shanghai rights lawyer Li Tiantian revealed that security officials sought to use footage to increase her isolation during a three-month detention. “They even forced my boyfriend and his brothers and sisters to watch a video that showed me walking into a hotel with other men,” she wrote on Twitter. Wang said state security used cameras to track individuals at sensitive times, but they probably also relied on them for deterrence. “I think the effect is more to intimidate activists – so they feel everything they do is under watch – rather than to gather evidence,” she said. China Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …