Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 197)
Hannity: Newt’s Gotcha Question Shows Double Standard

Click here to view this media Debates are fun, but post-debate spins are even more fun especially with Sean Hannity’s tiny pea-brain memory. During last night’s debate, Chris Wallace asked Newt about his campaign staff quitting en masse. Newt was not very happy about the question. Wallace pointed out to Gingrich that, in June, he suffered a huge staff exodus. “How do you respond to people who say that your campaign has been a mess so far?” he asked. Gingrich was highly displeased by the question, and he turned on Wallace. “I took seriously Bret’s injunction to put aside the talking points,” he said, referring to a request Wallace’s co-host Bret Baier had made at the outset of the debate. “And I wish you would put aside the gotcha questions…I’d love to see the rest of tonight’s debate asking us about what we would do to lead America…instead of playing Mickey Mouse games.” [h/t Huffington Post ] And of course, Sean Hannity was appropriately concerned for poor Newt, but evidently that concern obliterated his short-term memory. HANNITY: You know, I don’t mind hard questions. I think they’re important. As I was watching tonight’s debate, you know what ran through my mind? In all the time that President Obama ran, he didn’t experience one of these moments that I can really think of. So the double standard is clear. Sean, Sean, Sean. Obviously you can’t really think of these moments because you don’t think. Or pay attention. So let’s take a walk down memory lane to April 15, 2008 and the debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in Philadelphia. And let me refresh your memory, courtesy of the divine Ms. Heather who made this wonderful mashup at the time. Click here to view this media [h/t Heather] Here are just a few of the questions directed to then-Senator Obama. You should watch the whole mashup for the full impact. It’s five full minutes of fail. Five full minutes of fail in ONE debate. Do you think Rev. Wright loves America as much as you do? Voters don’t believe you’re honest or trustworthy. Are you? Why don’t you wear a flag pin? It was so bad everyone forgot the debate and just went full-tilt after ABC. Here on Crooks and Liars, we had Steve Benen’s roundup of journalists’ horror, and Nicole Belle pointed out that George Stephanopoulis got debate tips and marching orders from — wait for it — Sean Hannity . Seems Sean gave George a few question suggestions on his radio show earlier that day. Like these: 1) Ask Obama about his relationship with Ayers and WeatherUnderground and Axelrod’s comments, “They’re friendly” 2) Ask Obama why he attended the Million Man March There’s a double standard, all right. Hannity’s.

Continue reading …
Hannity: Newt’s Gotcha Question Shows Double Standard

Click here to view this media Debates are fun, but post-debate spins are even more fun especially with Sean Hannity’s tiny pea-brain memory. During last night’s debate, Chris Wallace asked Newt about his campaign staff quitting en masse. Newt was not very happy about the question. Wallace pointed out to Gingrich that, in June, he suffered a huge staff exodus. “How do you respond to people who say that your campaign has been a mess so far?” he asked. Gingrich was highly displeased by the question, and he turned on Wallace. “I took seriously Bret’s injunction to put aside the talking points,” he said, referring to a request Wallace’s co-host Bret Baier had made at the outset of the debate. “And I wish you would put aside the gotcha questions…I’d love to see the rest of tonight’s debate asking us about what we would do to lead America…instead of playing Mickey Mouse games.” [h/t Huffington Post ] And of course, Sean Hannity was appropriately concerned for poor Newt, but evidently that concern obliterated his short-term memory. HANNITY: You know, I don’t mind hard questions. I think they’re important. As I was watching tonight’s debate, you know what ran through my mind? In all the time that President Obama ran, he didn’t experience one of these moments that I can really think of. So the double standard is clear. Sean, Sean, Sean. Obviously you can’t really think of these moments because you don’t think. Or pay attention. So let’s take a walk down memory lane to April 15, 2008 and the debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in Philadelphia. And let me refresh your memory, courtesy of the divine Ms. Heather who made this wonderful mashup at the time. Click here to view this media [h/t Heather] Here are just a few of the questions directed to then-Senator Obama. You should watch the whole mashup for the full impact. It’s five full minutes of fail. Five full minutes of fail in ONE debate. Do you think Rev. Wright loves America as much as you do? Voters don’t believe you’re honest or trustworthy. Are you? Why don’t you wear a flag pin? It was so bad everyone forgot the debate and just went full-tilt after ABC. Here on Crooks and Liars, we had Steve Benen’s roundup of journalists’ horror, and Nicole Belle pointed out that George Stephanopoulis got debate tips and marching orders from — wait for it — Sean Hannity . Seems Sean gave George a few question suggestions on his radio show earlier that day. Like these: 1) Ask Obama about his relationship with Ayers and WeatherUnderground and Axelrod’s comments, “They’re friendly” 2) Ask Obama why he attended the Million Man March There’s a double standard, all right. Hannity’s.

Continue reading …
News of the World: police watchdog investigates Milly Dowler leak

Surrey police officer alleged to have given information to tabloid about investigation into teenager’s murder The police watchdog is investigating an allegation that a Surrey police officer gave information about the Milly Dowler murder investigation to the News of the World. On Friday the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said it was investigating the claim following a voluntary referral from the force about an allegation that an officer gave information to the newspaper in relation to the investigation into Dowler’s murder in 2002. “An IPCC deputy senior investigator has been over at Surrey police this morning to get more information about the case and will be writing to the Dowler family, via their solicitors at their request, this afternoon and offering to meet to give them more detail,” the commission said. “Until then, it would not be appropriate for us to make any further detail public.” The Guardian understands that the allegations relate to the early stages of the investigation into Dowler’s disappearance. It is thought a Surrey police officer met a female journalist from the News of the World at a social event in London and told her details about the leads officers who were working on the case were following. It is not thought he was paid for that information. Sources claimed the officer in question was publicly admonished in front of colleagues when the paper subsequently published the information in a story, taken off the case and then disciplined. The Dowler family’s solicitor, Mark Lewis, said he had not been told how long the IPCC investigation will take. “They need to look at their own information about who the officer was, what he said and what he gave out,” he told the BBC News channel, referring to the information passed voluntarily to the commission by Surrey police. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook . News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Milly Dowler Crime Police James Robinson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Chinese bullet trains recalled in wake of fatal crash

Train speeds reduced and new rail projects blocked as critics fear high-speed service is rife with problems A Chinese bullet train manufacturer has recalled 54 trains, in the latest sign that the government has launched an overhaul of the beleaguered high-speed rail network in the wake of last month’s fatal crash. The hugely ambitious project was a matter of national prestige – evidence that China could build not only faster but, said officials, better than anyone else. But the disaster at Wenzhou in Zhejiang province killed 40 people and sparked an outpouring of public fury which focused not just on the safety of the line but also on the authorities’ handling of events, with accusations that they were seeking to cover up problems. Many saw it as emblematic of the dangers of China’s accelerated development. The recall is not directly linked to the collision, which involved trains made by a rival firm. The recalled trains are from the Beijing-Shanghai line, which launched on 1 July to mark the 90th anniversary of the Communist party – but has suffered repeated delays. But the announcement comes days after officials imposed a moratorium on new rail projects and the rail minister announced a reduction in train speeds. Experts believe it is part of a wider overhaul of the powerful railways ministry, which began when the minister – who championed the aggressive roll-out of high-speed rail – was ousted in February. He is expected to face corruption charges. State-owned China North Locomotive and Rolling Stock Ltd said the recall applied to model CRH380BL trains used on the Beijing-Shanghai line. Spokesman Tan Xiaofeng said experts will examine whether sensors are halting trains unnecessarily because they are faulty or too sensitive – for example being set off when a door is ajar or a passenger smokes in a toilet. “When problems occur, we don’t wish to hide them,” he said. “We put life before everything else.” He said the line had suffered “frequent quality problems” due to components from American, European and domestic suppliers. Earlier this week, the company announced a temporary halt to production of the trains. Zhao Jian of Beijing Jiaotong University, a prominent critic of the expansion programme, said the recall and the cutting of train speeds would help rebuild confidence. “I think the public will be less worried, at least less worried than if the speed was not slowed down,” he said. “In my eyes, this is the state council correcting the “great leap” by the last leadership of the ministry of railways … This is definitely a major step”. But he said there were a series of problems to be exposed, such as “debt, technical safety and the fact that high-speed rail will not ease China’s transportation difficulties and isn’t suitable for China’s economy”. Zhao said he believed the concerns about high-speed rail would ensure drastic reforms, with authorities likely to merge the ministry of railways into a transport super-ministry – as they tried to do several years ago, only to be thwarted by the rail ministry. Ren Xianfang, senior China economist for IHS Global Insight, said the Wenzhou disaster had convinced officials to “rectify the excesses” of its system. Ren likened the impact of the crash to the way that Fukushima had turned the Japanese public against nuclear power, adding: “It is quite clear now that stepping on the brake is the only viable policy option.” The days after the crash saw an extraordinary spate of bold reporting from Chinese media, who challenged the official response before they were reined in. China has the world’s largest high-speed train network, rolled out at a frenetic pace. But critics argued even before the crash that the focus should be on expanding freight and lower-cost services that ordinary citizens could afford, rather than on prestigious high-tech projects. Safety concerns were also raised. Sun Zhang, a professor at the railway and urban mass transit research institute of Tongji University, told China Daily that he supported the idea of cutting train speeds, saying China should take time to test the system and gain experience. He said it took Japan almost half a century to increase the speed of its Shinkansen bullet train from 210 kilometres an hour [130mph] to 300kph. “So it’s impressive, and at the same time a bit worrisome, that China managed to achieve speeds of 350 kilometres an hour in just seven years,” he added. Officials initially blamed the July crash on faulty signals equipment, but a senior investigator told the Beijing Times on Friday that the crash also exposed management failings and could have been avoided. “There were serious flaws in the system design that led to an equipment failure,” said Luo Lin, the minister of China’s state administration of work safety. “At the same time, this exposed problems in emergency response and safety management after the failure occurred. “This was a major accident involving culpability that could have been totally avoided,” he said. Additional research by Han Cheng China Rail transport Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
UPDATE: Dougherty Sister ‘Deserved To Get Shot,’ Mother Devastated After Children Captured (VIDEO)

PUEBLO, Colo. (AP) — A woman caught with her two brothers after a nationwide manhunt told Colorado authorities she “deserved to get shot,” according to an arrest affidavit. Lee Grace Dougherty, 29, Dylan Dougherty Stanley, 26, and Ryan Edward Dougherty, 21, are being held in Pueblo County, Colo., on bonds of $1.25 million each. The three made their first court appearance Thursday in Pueblo, Colo., appearing by video from jail. They face charges of attempted murder of a peace officer and assault on a peace officer. The charges stem from allegations that they shot at authorities in Colorado. Lee Dougherty was shot in the leg by Walsenburg, Colo., Police Chief James Chamblerlain after she pointed a machine gun at him, according to the affidavit. The document says she later told police, “I deserved to get shot.” Their mother, Barbara Bell of East Palatka, Fla., spoke briefly Thursday to The Associated Press but declined to discuss their ordeal, saying she didn’t think it would help them in the long run. “Thank God they’re not tried by the media,” she said. “They’re tried in a court of law and their story will come out at that time.” Bell hung up the phone shortly after a reporter called, saying she needed to keep the line open for concerned family members to reach her. “I’m devastated and I’m trying to be strong for other family members,” Bell said. “Throughout all of this, I think everybody just wanted it to stop. And now it’s over.” Her children – Lee Grace Dougherty, 29, Dylan Dougherty Stanley, 26, and Ryan Edward Dougherty, 21, – face four Colorado state charges each of first-degree assault on a peace officer. They were scheduled for a first appearance in court Thursday in Pueblo, Colo. Authorities said the trio will appear by video from the jail, and won’t be transported to the courtroom. The siblings also have no-bond warrants in Georgia and Florida on charges they shot at a police officer in Florida and robbed a bank in Georgia. “These three have a big legal mess in front of them and at some point they’ll face charges in all those jurisdictions,” FBI Special Agent Phil Niedringhaus said. After images of the trio were broadcast on television, someone tipped Colorado state troopers and the Pueblo County sheriff around 9 a.m. Wednesday that the suspects might be at a campground south of Colorado Springs, Colo. A Pueblo County sheriff’s detective spotted the car near an interstate highway that day, followed it discreetly until state troopers joined him, and the chase was on. AK-47 rounds were fired at the four patrol cars during the pursuit south on the interstate, where speeds exceeded 100 mph, said Lt. Col. Anthony Padilla of the Colorado State Patrol. In Walsenburg, Colo., troopers deployed spiked stop strips across the interstate. A tire was punctured on the Subaru the siblings were driving, sending it rolling and crashing into a guardrail. Lee Dougherty was shot in the leg after she pointed a gun at a police officer near the car, authorities said, adding that she was trying to escape on foot. Another one of the suspects was apprehended after a brief foot chase. Three highway workers reportedly helped track and capture that sibling. Dave Dallaguardia told ABC’s “Good Morning America” Thursday that he followed Ryan Dougherty in his truck even after the fugitive had motioned at him as if he had a gun. Dallaguardia said he had no idea he was chasing one of the Dougherty siblings and his wife later scolded him for pursuing him. He said he and his co-workers came from small, blue-collar towns. “If you need to lend a hand, you lend a hand and help people out,” Dallaguardia said. Lee Dougherty was treated at a Walsenburg hospital for a gunshot wound and her brothers received treatment for injuries suffered in the crash. They were later transferred to Pueblo County Jail. The trio reportedly had bought camping gear and were hiding out in the remote San Isabel National Forest in southern Colorado. PHOTOS: Dougherty Siblings

Continue reading …
Michele Bachmann Once Again Lies About Debt-Ceiling In Debate

Click here to view this media Michele Bachmann lies. That’s no surprise. But in this case, her lie is so insidious and stupid that it just has to be debunked. When asked about the debt-ceiling, she said she wouldn’t have raised it because Congress had an opportunity to cut spending and ducked it. Of course, she doesn’t say that the debt-ceiling relates to debt already authorized by Congress, the funds have been appropriated, and whether she voted for those appropriations for that or not, it’s what they’ve done. A refusal to honor that debt and invite default (either on payments to the debt or promised spending) is the dishonorable claim of a deadbeat. But wait, there’s more. Bachmann once again refers to the $2 trillion-dollar “blank check.” Maybe it’s just me, but blank checks usually don’t have amounts on them, right? Now we get to the real lie. Here it is: BACHMANN: I think we just heard from Standard & Poor’s. When they dropped our credit rating what they said is we don’t have an ability to repay our debt. That’s what the final word was from them . I was proved right in my position. We should not have raised the debt ceiling and instead, we should have cut government spending, which was not done and then we needed to get our spending priorities in order. That’s a pants-on-fire moment for Bachmann. Here is a direct quote from a Standard & Poor’s conference call yesterday: Finally, there is the political analysis, which is an important element of our sovereign criteria, and you have to remember of course that with sovereigns, unlike most issuers, the question is not only of ability to pay but also willingness to pay. It’s quite an important one because no one can force a sovereign to pay its debt, cannot force a sovereign into bankruptcy. So we have to look at the willingness and that’s done primarily by analyzing the politics. You look here at how important, from a policy perspective, paying the nation’s debts are, and also how much pro-active and effective and stable policy-making is there to ensure fiscal sustainability over the long term. So we think that this also has deteriorated, in recent years compared to other AAA countries, and that was why we moved to a negative outlook in April. Both fiscal and the political realities. And as we watched the fiscal debate going on intensely for many months this year and we noticed how little progress was being made in terms of bridging the gap between the two sides — one very focused on revenue measures to address the deficit issue and the other very focused on expenditures and not very much common ground between them — we noticed that there was not much moving together despite many months of debate. And in addition to this, we also had serious questions being raised about the debt ceiling and yes we’ve raised the debt ceiling many times in the past 50 years but we believe that the debate that was had this year was even more contentious and unproductive than previous ones. And the fact is, you know, we had a large proportion of not just anyone, but elected officials who seemed to be seriously advocating that paying US government debt in full and on time was less important than other domestic priorities that they advocated. That’s something that you don’t see happen in AAA countries. As a result of that and as a result of the continued what we view as very slow progress in addressing both the medium term and the longer term fiscal issues we view the politics in the U.S. as moving away from what we expect in a AAA country. So let’s review here. The prime factor that’s different now from the last ratings cycle is that we have batsh*t crazy politicians like Michele Bachmann casting doubt on our WILL to pay. Not our ability. Our WILL. And it all started when Bush took office and gave away the tax cut store, screwed up the plan to be deficit-free by 2012, and put a couple of wars on the credit card. Yes. Michele Bachmann lied. And this one was a whopper the size of Moby Dick, because it’s people like her who are the reason we can’t have nice things.

Continue reading …
French economy stagnates as consumers cut spending

European stock markets fall as Eurostat data shows French GDP was flat in the second quarter The French economy failed to grow in the last quarter as households across the country cut their spending, in the latest sign that Europe’s economy is stumbling. Data released by Eurostat, the region’s statistics body, on Friday showed that French GDP was stagnant between April and June. Economists had expected the economy to grow by around 0.3%. The disappointing data helped to send stock markets across Europe lower at the start of trading, with the FTSE 100 falling 40 points to 5122. France’s CAC 40 was down 1.9% at 3030.48. Household consumption in France fell by 0.7% compared with the first three months of 2011, increasing the pressure on president Nicolas Sarkozy to convince financial markets that he can meet his fiscal targets. Sarkozy has promised to release revised plans to cut France’s budget deficit within days. Finance minister François Baroin said the French government had no plans to change its targets for GDP growth on the back of one quarter’s data. He also pointed out that France’s economy had grown by 0.9% in the first three months of 2011. “For this year we are in line [with targets],” Baroin told French radio. In contrast, the UK economy grew by 0.5% in the first quarter of 2011, and 0.2% in the second. Baroin also insisted that France’s banks were among the safest in the world, just hours after regulators banned traders from ‘short-selling’ certain financial stocks in France, Italy, Spain and Belgium . Despite this move, shares in Société Générale and BNP Paribas fell by more than 3% in early trading. France has also denied that its AAA credit rating is at risk. Global economy Europe Europe Global recession Economics France Financial crisis Graeme Wearden guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
China recalls bullet trains in safety scare

Public anger as China’s rail industry suffers fresh blow only weeks after 40 killed in high-speed crash China’s second-biggest trainmaker is to recall 54 bullet trains used on the new showcase Beijing-Shanghai line for safety reasons, dealing a fresh blow to the nation’s rail system. The recall of the trains by China CNR Corp Ltd comes three weeks after 40 people were killed in a high-speed rail crash, which triggered public fury , unusually bold media coverage and a freeze on approvals for new railway projects . China’s high-speed rail drive was until recently held up by senior government officials as a symbol of the nation’s technological prowess. Now it has become a political albatross, drawing scorn from many citizens already frustrated with the hulking railways ministry. China’s fast-growing microblog websites have served to amplify public anger , and the recall drew more catcalls on the popular Weibo site. “Wasn’t this locomotive the most advanced type, and put into use only after many tests? So how come the problems were discovered after they were put into operation? What a miracle,” wrote one Weibo user. “Can we also recall the Ministry of Railways?,” asked another. Officials blamed July’s crash first on a lightning strike and then on faulty signals technology. But on Friday Chinese media quoted a senior investigator as saying the crash also exposed management failings and could have been avoided. “There were serious flaws in the system design that led to an equipment failure,” said Luo Lin, the minister of China’s State Administration of Work Safety, who is leading the investigation. “At the same time, this exposed problems in emergency response and safety management after the failure occurred,” the Beijing Times cited Luo as saying. “This was a major accident involving culpability that could have been totally avoided,” he said. Industry analyst Lu Zhou said the recalls added to signs that China’s high-speed railway boom faced bleak times. “The government is putting a sudden brake on China’s high-speed railway story, and we must wait for the bad days to pass over,” said Lu, an analyst with Everbright Securities in Shanghai. “A Great Leap Forward-style movement in China’s high-speed railway is changing abruptly to a period of silence, and that could last a few years,” he said. The Great Leap Forward was Mao Zedong’s disastrous effort in the late 1950s to catapult China into communist prosperity. But China could not afford to curtail train investment in the longer-term, said Luo. “After all, China’s railway system can’t go back to the old days of shabby green cars.” China Rail transport Rail travel guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Rush Limbaugh: ‘The Chris Matthewses and the Media Are Very Close to the Rioters in London in Terms of Anger, Disappointment’

As NewsBusters reported , MSNBC's Chris Matthews on Wednesday took some poorly-researched cheap shots at conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh responded Thursday explaining that this is borne of frustration over the failure of Barack Obama noting, “The Chris Matthewses and the media are very close to the rioters in London in terms of anger, disappointment” (video follows with transcript and commentary): RUSH LIMBAUGH: Snerdley, I think it's a sign of effectiveness. Snerdley is all upset because last night on MSNBC Chris Matthews… (sigh) You know, I don't know if he's lost his mind and it would be insensitive to mock him and make fun of him until he goes through some rigorous therapy. I'm not a psychiatrist; I'm a radio guy. LIMBAUGH: There's an unsettledness out there, a disquietedness, a general sense of panic. This is not how it's supposed to be. You know what? The Chris Matthewses and the media are very close to the rioters in London in terms of anger, disappointment. This is not how it was supposed to be! We were supposed to have utopia. This was a new kind of politician, and the politics of old was supposed to vanish, and there really wasn't supposed to be any more opposition to a president. Everybody was supposed to sign up, and there was gonna be this massive, nationwide love affair — worldwide love affair — not only for Obama, but for our country again. We were supposed to have an economic rebound. None of this was supposed to happen, and they have no choice but than to look at themselves when trying to explain why all this has happened. They have held near supermajorities for much of the last four years in the House of Representatives, then in the Senate, and now they add the White House to it. Every day they wake up and look out over the country, and they see the consequences of what they believe, and in those rare moments where the reality permeates and they admit the truth to themselves, they realize it's their policies that have done all this. As it was pointed out the other day, these people all have 401(k)s as well. They all have retirement accounts, and they've all got kids, and they've all got futures to be concerned about — and, you know, at some point they start saying, is my kids' future worth supporting this guy? Now, they not ever gonna voice that, so when these moments of panic and disquiet set in, you go out — just like the rioters in London — and you attack who you think is responsible for foiling all this, and it's clear that in the case of many on the left Obama would have been a stunning, overwhelming, resounding success…if it weren't for me. So now I become the focal point of blame, I become the target. LIMBAUGH: You have to say: Where was the staff? Did they bother in the commercial break to say, “You know, Chris, that didn't happen?” But, you know, of all the shortcomings at MSNBC, not seeking help for the troubled Chris Matthews, that's about as low as they can get. Clearly he's in need of serious assistance over there. Not surprisingly, Limbaugh was spot on. The reality is that folks like Matthews and his colleagues abdicated their journalistic responsibilities in 2007 and 2008 by assisting a presidential candidate into the White House rather than vetting and thoroughly analyzing him for their readers and viewers. Their expectation was this “messiah” would solve all that ailed the nation, the world would be a better place, and their media malpractice would be vindicated and therefore forgiven. Years later with the country still facing stubbornly high unemployment and a possible double-dip recession in the wake of the nation's first ever credit rating downgrade, these same folks are frustrated by all they see. Of course, when in front of the camera or a keyboard, they're still largely blaming all our troubles on George W. Bush and the Tea Party. But privately, they know this isn't the case, and they're concerned their dreams of a socialist utopia in the United States are fading away. So they're angry just like the rioters in London. Unfortunately, they're not mad enough – or at least not yet – to jump off the Obama bandwagon, fully admit their mistakes as well as his shortcomings, and tell the American people that this man isn't and never was qualified to be President of the United States. Quite the contrary, they will for the next roughly fifteen months attack every Republican candidate as they do all in their power to get the current White House resident four more years. This raises a question: Which is worse – the so-called journalist that blindly supports an individual out of hope that he represents something truly special or the media shill that continues to do so after he's realized the object of his affection has no clothes? Video courtesy Daily Rushbo.

Continue reading …

To quote Lawrence O’Donnell from his show back in February , Wayne LaPierre is “Washington’s lobbyist in favor of murderers’ rights, always to use the gun of their choice.” There is no better summary of a man who ensures his $1.27 million salary every year by being a paid serial liar in defense of arms dealers, which groups such as the Violence Policy Center have made clear again and again . So it should be no surprise that when faced with the rights of Americans to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, or those of Mexican Drug Cartels, he comes down squarely on the side of the latter, as pointed out by Media Matters : Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the National Rifle Association (NRA), has been on a media blitz trying to defend an NRA lawsuit that attempts to block an executive rule aimed at keeping guns out of the hands of cartels and criminals. The new rule would require gun stores along the border with Mexico to report to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) when a person purchases multiple long guns, such as the cartel favorite AK-47. ATF agent and Fast and Furious whistleblower Peter Forcelli, whom the NRA has previously cited as an expert on tactics, disagrees with LaPierre. Forcelli told Political Correction that the “vast majority of ATF agents support the reporting requirement, because they know how it works.” Of course it works. It is common sense that it would work, except manufacturing doubt–from the oil companies to the tobacco pushers to the gun runners–is what these guys do. Common sense and science are their enemies. They might save a few lives, but then LaPierre might only make $1.1 million per annum. Follow me on Twitter: @cliffschecter

Continue reading …