Click here to view this media It’s not everyday you see a would-be Republican nominee for the highest office in the land find inspiration in the music from a children’s cartoon and tell America about it. Ok, well Herman Cain didn’t exactly do that, saying instead he was quoting “a poet”. No Matter. I was so impressed I had to have a little fun with this surreal image. Via NYMag : One of the weirdest moments of last night’s Republican debate probably slipped completely under the radar for most viewers. This moment occurred in Herman Cain’s closing statement, when the former pizza-chain CEO recited a favorite inspirational quote: “A poet once said, ‘life can be a challenge, life can seem impossible, but it’s never easy when there’s so much on the line.’” Nothing strange about that on the surface, until you Google the quote and you realize that these words of wisdom were uttered not by a poet, but by disco queen Donna Summer in her song “The Power of One.” Even more bizarre, this isn’t even one of Summer’s classic hits — she recorded it just over a decade ago as the theme song for Pokémon: The Movie 2000 . enlarge
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Conservative MSNBC host Joe Scarborough Thursday tore into the base of the Republican Party in Iowa for pushing Michele Bachmann, someone who is “never going to get close winning the presidential nomination.” “Michele Bachmann’s first answer was, I wish the federal government had defaulted,” Scarborough recalled Bachmann saying during Thursday night’s Republican debate. “Had defaulted! A week after Americans lost — some of them perhaps lost half of their pensions. Lost half of their 401ks. When trillions of dollars went down the drain with Americans suffering, she said that and got applause.” “If anybody thinks that guys like my dad are going to be voting that way… they are out of their mind and they are too stupid not only to prognosticate, they are too stupid to run Slurpee machines in Des Moines… Michele Bachmann is a joke. She is a joke. Her answer is a joke. Her candidacy is a joke… Iowa, if you let her win, you prove your irrelevance once again.”
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Republican presidential candidates are having a tough time on the “Soapbox” at the Iowa State Fair this week. A flustered Mitt Romney told an angry crowd Thursday that he wouldn’t raise taxes on big companies because ” corporations are people .” Tim Pawlenty took to the very same stage Friday where a gay man named Gabe confronted him about his stand against marriage equality. “I want to address one concern of mine and this is you have not had the courage to stand for me and my friends,” Gabe told Pawlenty. “As a member of the GLBT community, you have not stood for us and that is really hard for me. As someone who supports the [anti-gay] National Organization for Marriage, someone that stands for the definition of marriage between one man and one woman, I thought our country was about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone. No exceptions. So, Tim Pawlenty, I want to know, when will you stand up for me?” “That is what I want to know from you today because you are discriminating against me and it hurts. It really does.” “I understand we have a difference of opinion on this issue,” Pawlenty replied. “The relationship between a man and a woman in a traditional marriage is important to our country, our society, our culture. I think it should remain elevated, not just in our words but under our laws. And that’s why I have supported laws — in fact, have authored laws — to maintain marriage as between a man and woman.” “I support that you have your moral values,” Gabe said, not backing down. “But that is something that is hurting my future and how I get to live my life. And that is something that someone that talks about government getting out of your lives, why does government get involved in our marriages?” “We’re just going to have a respectful disagreement,” the candidate said. “Do you think I’m a second class citizen?” Gabe asked. “We’re just going to have a respectful disagreement, sir,” Pawlenty repeated.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media A planned protest of Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) fizzled Thursday after officials reportedly cut cell phone services at some stations. BART spokesman Linton Johnson told a KTVU reporter, who had noticed the disruption, that the public relations department had suggested that phone service be shut down. Another BART spokesman, Jim Allison, reportedly admitted that the tactic had been “part of a larger strategy.” But Allison later claimed that he had been mistaken and phone service was not blocked. “I haven’t been able to find another incident in which this has happened,” criminologist Casey Jordan told CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux Friday. “I think perhaps it is unprecedented, and yet that’s how these legal issues come to light and get debated. Whether it’s legal or not it hasn’t been tested in the courts. Public safety exceptions to or encroachments on our personal freedoms do happen.” “A lot of people are wondering, what happened to freedom of speech, assembly without government interference that’s protected by the First Amendment?” Malveaux asked. “They didn’t try to shut down the protest. They simply turned off the cell service so it couldn’t become viral,” Jordan explained. “It really is just a cost/benefit analysis of where your freedom of speech begins to threaten the public safety.” The group No Justice, No BART had called for the protest following a string of killings by BART police. “We are fighting for justice for Charles Hill, Oscar Grant, Fred Collins, Bruce Seward, Jerrold Hall, Robert Greer, and all victims of BART police violence and murder,” the group said. “We demand that BART disband its murderous, inept, corrupt police department.” Cross posted at Raw Story
Continue reading …Reporter Ethan Bronner brought a typical liberal issue to the forefront on Friday’s front page: “Protests Force Israel to Confront Wealth Gap.” Tent-city protesters have “shaken” Israel with their call for fairly distributed wealth. Bronner never identified the protesters as left-leaning in any way. They were merely championing a cause with “strong populist resonance.” These large protests are a story, but no one in this article really questioned the protesters or suggested this was a very political campaign against prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Eugene Kandel, Netanyahu’s chief economic adviser, was interviewed, and he stressed agreement with the notion that “large and leveraged business groups can slow growth, cause instability, and hinder competition.” Daniel Doron, director of the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress, defined as a “pro-market research organization,” sounded like a liberal American Democrat. He complained that privatized Israeli assets being abused: “Today, the whole Israeli economy is built on rapacious elites fleecing consumers.” That sounds more like Bill Moyers than “pro-market” Milton Friedman. Bronner channeled the protester demands: The “tycoons,” as they are known even in Hebrew, are suddenly facing enraged scrutiny as middle-class families complain that a country once viewed as an example of intimate equality today has one of the largest gaps between rich and poor in the industrialized world. The tent-city protesters, who have shifted the public discourse by demanding affordable housing and other essential goods, issued a document this week calling for a new socioeconomic agenda. Topping their goals: “minimizing social inequalities.” In an earlier story on the protests, on July 31 , Bronner was more forthcoming that the protests were “a possible opening for the defeated left.” Bronner’s new story underlined that while some believe the income gap has gotten short media shrift, other outlets have thrown it at Netanyahu: Guy Rolnik, editor of The Marker, a financial daily owned by Haaretz that has attacked concentration of wealth, said the issue had gotten short shrift in the media because of who owned the companies and fears of losing advertising. Often newspapers seem to be the tools of moguls battling one another as well as certain political figures. A television journalist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicacy of the matter, said his station would probably not do a program on wealth concentration to avoid upsetting the station's owners. But many of the moguls are somewhat to Mr. Netanyahu's left on foreign policy, and their newspapers can be merciless on him. Other newspapers accuse the prime minister of being in bed with the rich. Still others say his focus on the tycoons is an attempt to draw attention away from the cost of settlements and his failed peace policies. That sounds a bit more like America, where wealthy liberal newspaper owners often rail against maldistribution of wealth from the left.
Continue reading …Charles Krauthammer on Friday evening exposed a classic liberal media hypocrisy concerning the differing bar used to determine truthfulness in politicians depending on their political leaning. When “Inside Washington” panelist Nina Totenberg (NPR) asked if Republican presidential candidates might not have been totally honest Thursday evening when they all said they wouldn't accept a budget that incorporated ten dollars worth of spending cuts for every dollar raised in taxes, Krauthammer smartly responded, “Obama in the end said he wouldn’t sign a bill that didn’t increase taxes. In the end, he did. Was he lying?” (video follows with transcript and commentary): COLBY KING, WASHINGTON POST: But I found most telling, the thing I found most telling in the debate was a question that was raised by Bret Baier the moderator. GORDON PETERSON, HOST: Good moderator. KING: Excellent moderator. As a matter of fact I thought the panel was very good except for a couple of questions. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: Hmm hmm. KING: When he asked about a deal, “Would you accept a deal when you get ten, you know, for every ten dollars, ten cuts you get one tax increase?” To a person, they all said they would reject such a deal. That tells you about where the Republican field is. It’s, it’s Tea Party locked in. ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: Exactly, they all joined the Tea Party at that moment. KING: Yeah. PETERSON: Ten to one. No? CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah, well, I would do it. [Laughter] PETERSON: You’re not running. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: And I think that was the problem for the Republican Party in this debate. I mean, you know, Romney definitely by staying above the fray was the, as you sad, adult in the room. But when you sort of, any Party gets defined by these debates somewhat, and if you, if the Party looks whacky, which that answer makes it look, it’s not good for the Party. KRAUTHAMMER: On, come on, don’t be silly. The Republican, if you’re a Republican nominee, and you’re running in Iowa, the first caucus, of course you’re going to take a hard line… TOTENBERG: What, you’re going to lie? KRAUTHAMMER: …you take a hard line on taxes. Obama in the end said he wouldn’t sign a bill that didn’t increase taxes. In the end, he did. Was he lying? Exactly. It really has been amazing to watch media members like Totenberg completely forgive Obama all the promises he's broken. From extending the Bush tax cuts, to leaving Gitmo open, continuing renditions, and most recently raising the debt ceiling without tax hikes, the current White House resident has gone back on more pledges in a shorter period of time than virtually any president in recent memory. When a Republican does this – for example, George H.W. Bush with his no new taxes campaign promise – he is thoroughly excoriated by the press even if they support his new position. But Obama can promise the American people anything he wants and break such assurances with the full knowledge that his faithful supporters in the media will either ignore his transgression or cover it up. Must be nice.
Continue reading …Charles Krauthammer on Friday evening exposed a classic liberal media hypocrisy concerning the differing bar used to determine truthfulness in politicians depending on their political leaning. When “Inside Washington” panelist Nina Totenberg (NPR) asked if Republican presidential candidates might not have been totally honest Thursday evening when they all said they wouldn't accept a budget that incorporated ten dollars worth of spending cuts for every dollar raised in taxes, Krauthammer smartly responded, “Obama in the end said he wouldn’t sign a bill that didn’t increase taxes. In the end, he did. Was he lying?” (video follows with transcript and commentary): COLBY KING, WASHINGTON POST: But I found most telling, the thing I found most telling in the debate was a question that was raised by Bret Baier the moderator. GORDON PETERSON, HOST: Good moderator. KING: Excellent moderator. As a matter of fact I thought the panel was very good except for a couple of questions. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: Hmm hmm. KING: When he asked about a deal, “Would you accept a deal when you get ten, you know, for every ten dollars, ten cuts you get one tax increase?” To a person, they all said they would reject such a deal. That tells you about where the Republican field is. It’s, it’s Tea Party locked in. ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: Exactly, they all joined the Tea Party at that moment. KING: Yeah. PETERSON: Ten to one. No? CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Yeah, well, I would do it. [Laughter] PETERSON: You’re not running. NINA TOTENBERG, NPR: And I think that was the problem for the Republican Party in this debate. I mean, you know, Romney definitely by staying above the fray was the, as you sad, adult in the room. But when you sort of, any Party gets defined by these debates somewhat, and if you, if the Party looks whacky, which that answer makes it look, it’s not good for the Party. KRAUTHAMMER: On, come on, don’t be silly. The Republican, if you’re a Republican nominee, and you’re running in Iowa, the first caucus, of course you’re going to take a hard line… TOTENBERG: What, you’re going to lie? KRAUTHAMMER: …you take a hard line on taxes. Obama in the end said he wouldn’t sign a bill that didn’t increase taxes. In the end, he did. Was he lying? Exactly. It really has been amazing to watch media members like Totenberg completely forgive Obama all the promises he's broken. From extending the Bush tax cuts, to leaving Gitmo open, continuing renditions, and most recently raising the debt ceiling without tax hikes, the current White House resident has gone back on more pledges in a shorter period of time than virtually any president in recent memory. When a Republican does this – for example, George H.W. Bush with his no new taxes campaign promise – he is thoroughly excoriated by the press even if they support his new position. But Obama can promise the American people anything he wants and break such assurances with the full knowledge that his faithful supporters in the media will either ignore his transgression or cover it up. Must be nice.
Continue reading …Hey, listen, do you smell something? That’s the sight of a reader meetup coming over the horizon, fast! As we told you a few weeks back , we’re having a bit of a party on Thursday, August 25th at Guastavino’s , which is located at 59th Street in New York City . Things will kick off at 6:30pm that night and run until 10:30pm. It’s an all-ages event, but we can only manage 1,000 people in there at a time, and it’s first-come first-served, so don’t be late. We’ll have more Engadget editors on hand than you can shake a Bluetooth keyboard at, along with good friends from Joystiq and TUAW plus gadgets, giveaways and maybe some surprises. If you’re a member of the media who would like to attend, an exhibitor who wants to show something off to the fans, or a sponsor who wants to be a part of the insanity, please e-mail us at meetup at engadget dot com . Everybody else, sit tight until then, and get ready to party! The NYC Engadget Reader Meetup is less than two weeks away! originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:11:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Mitt Romney defended his record at Bain Capital and claimed that “overall, in those hundred businesses we invested in, tens of thousands of jobs — net/net — were created. Romney also pushed back at criticisms of his record on job creation while Governor of Massachusetts. There’s an extensive article at Bloomberg on Romney’s record at Bain which would beg to differ with that assumption — Romney as Job Creator Clashes with Bain Record of Job Cuts . From the article, it seems one of his former directors made that same claim, but supplied no numbers to back it up. Preserved Jobs Geoffrey Rehnert, a former managing director at Bain who worked for the firm until 1999, said that while Bain was focused on making money, its strategy was to create businesses that created jobs. Rehnert, who is now co-chief executive officer with Wolpow at Audax, said he’s “certain that Bain Capital was a net creator of jobs by a wide margin,” while he had no data to support that. At a minimum, Wolpow said, Bain helped preserve jobs that otherwise might have been lost. Bain and the campaign didn’t respond to requests for job creation estimates. A Bloomberg News review of several Bain deals during Romney’s tenure showed that workers in some firms had indications their jobs might be in jeopardy soon after Bain moved into management. In other cases, pink slips arrived after Bain and its investors had collected their profits and left debts behind. Interviews with former employees and executives at Bain and companies it controlled, along with a review of Bain’s activities described in public documents and news accounts, paint a picture of an operation that wasn’t focused on expanding employment. Instead, Bain’s mission, like most private equity firms, was to generate gains for its investors. Think Progress has more on Romney’s record on job creation while he was Governor — Romney Gives Obama A Failing Grade, But Massachusetts Ranked 47th In Job Growth While He Was Governor : Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is focusing the early part of his presidential campaign on the economy, slamming Obama’s performance while touting himself as an experienced job creator. But while he assigns Obama a failing grade on his job performance thus far, reports from his time as governor show that Romney’s record as a job creator isn’t as strong as he would like voters to think. Massachusetts, which Romney governed from 2003-2007, ranked 47th among the 50 states in job creation numbers during his tenure. What Romney leaves out of his stump speech, however, is just how bad his state’s job creation statistics were during his four years as governor. Different job creation studies rank Massachusetts in the bottom four states during Romney’s administration. A study by the independent think tank MassINC ranked the state 49th in job creation from 2001-2007, ahead of only Michigan. And according to the U.S. Department of Labor, Massachusetts ranked 47th, ahead of only Michigan, Ohio, and Louisiana. Michigan and Ohio, both located in the Rust Belt, faced heavy job losses due to the flight of manufacturing jobs from the Midwest. Louisiana, meanwhile, lost hundreds of thousands of jobs in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. During Romney’s period as governor, Massachusetts’ job growth was just 0.9 percent , well behind other high-wage, high-skill economies in New York (2.7), California (4.7), and North Carolina (7.6). The national average, meanwhile, was better than 5 percent.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media It may not be clear which candidate won the Republican presidential candidate in Iowa Thursday, but Fox News host Chris Wallace might be the obvious loser. Wallace found himself being booed by a crowd that didn’t appreciate the relatively tough questions he posed to Newt Gingrich. “Speaker Gingrich, one of the ways we judge a candidate is the campaign they run,” Wallace explained. “In June, your entire staff resigned along with your staff here in Iowa. They said you were undisciplined in campaigning and fundraising. Last report you were a million dollars in debt. How do you respond to people who say that your campaign has been a mess so far?” “I wish you would put aside the gotcha questions,” Gingrich shot back as the audience booed Wallace. “I would love to see the rest of tonight’s debate asking us what we would do to lead an America whose president has failed to lead, instead of playing Mickey Mouse games.”
Continue reading …