Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 137)
Plane crashes off Chilean coast

Rescuers are searching for wreckage among the Juan Fernandez islands, 500 miles from the country’s Pacific coast A Chilean air force plane with 21 people aboard, including a popular local television host, crashed in the Juan Fernandez islands off the country’s Pacific coast, authorities said. Juan Fernandez’s mayor, Leopoldo Gonzalez, said the plane tried without success to land at the islands’ airport, which is 515 miles from Chile’s coast. “The accident must be accepted as a fact,” Gonzalez said in an interview with Television Nacional de Chile. Rescue boats were searching for the wreckage of the plane but so far they have only found some equipment, the mayor said. Defence minister Andres Allamand said searchers faced “particularly adverse” conditions, adding that the plane’s status was still listed as missing. Felipe Camiroaga, one of Chile’s most popular television presenters, was on the flight, Gonzalez said. Camiroaga, 44, worked for the state TV channel’s Good Morning Everyone programme, and was travelling to the islands for a story on the reconstruction following the 27 February magnitude-8.8 earthquake and tsunami that wiped out its main town. Also on board was businessman Felipe Cubillos, who had been working on post-earthquake reconstruction efforts. The Chilean air force plane took off from the capital, Santiago, at 2pm local time and lost contact with air control almost four hours later, according to a statement from aviation authorities. Chile Plane crashes Air transport guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Brian Paddick picked by Liberal Democrats for London mayoral race

2012 race will be rematch between Boris Johnson, Ken Livingstone and former Met deputy assistant commissioner London’s mayoral election next year will be a rematch between Boris Johnson, Ken Livingstone and Brian Paddick, after the former Scotland Yard deputy assistant commissioner was selected as the Liberal Democrats’ candidate for the second time. Paddick, who came third in the 2008 mayoral election when Johnson ousted Livingstone after two terms, was declared the winner after a four-horse race in which the former MP Lembit Opik was eliminated in the first round. Opik lost the safe Lib Dem seat of Montgomeryshire in the 2010 general election. On Friday, in an election run on the single transferrable vote, he secured just 252 votes, coming fourth behind London councillor Brian Haley, with 316. Paddick narrowly won on second preference votes (1,567), with Mike Tuffrey, a member of the London assembly, close behind on 1,476. About 6,000 London party members were eligible to vote. Paddick, who had said he was undecided about standing when he put in his nomination papers in June, has pledged to fight for a “fair deal” for Londoners, to protect local community policing and to hold down bus fares. He thanked Liberal Democrat members “who placed their trust and confidence in me to be their candidate for mayor of London – I won’t let you down”. Opik, who had previously claimed that “forces within the party” were trying to prevent him standing, conceded defeat before the final result was announced. He told the Evening Standard: “I stood because I felt the Lib Dems desperately need to reach out beyond their traditional voters. Boris and Ken are celebrity politicians. I fear the party doesn’t grasp the implication of this.” He was not quitting. “I’ll be back,” he said. Some in the party are resigned to next year’s election being a Johnson-Livingstone rematch, and see the mayoral election as a way of boosting the party’s profile for the London assembly elections taking place at the same time. Currently it holds just three seats out of 25. Nick Clegg, the Lib Dem leader and deputy prime minister, said Paddick provided Londoners with a “real, credible alternative” to Johnson and Livingstone. “Brian’s experience is exactly what London needs right now. Whether dealing with the aftermath of the riots or phone hacking and corruption in the Metropolitan police, Brian has shown in recent weeks that he has the authority and leadership London needs.”The phone hacking scandal that rocked News International, the Metropolitan police and the political establishment is likely to surface in the 2012 contest. Paddick, whose phone was hacked by the now defunct News of the World, is among a group of public figures who have sought permission for a judicial review of the Met’s handling of the phone hacking scandal. Johnson, the incumbent mayor who declared his intention to seek a second term a year ago, came under fire over the summer for having dismissed reports that News of the World’s use of phone hacking was more widespread than first thought as “codswallop” – a claim that turned out to be wide of the mark. Livingstone, who was the first to declare his intention to stand again, was mayor when the original police investigation was conducted in 2006. Paddick, who retired from the police in 2007 after 30 years of service, told the Evening Standard on Friday that reformed gang members should go into school to warn children of the dangers of getting involved in violent crime, after the recent riots in the capital raised fears about violent young people. London politics Brian Paddick Boris Johnson Liberal Democrats Ken Livingstone London Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Storm Lee could unleash torrential rains and floods in Gulf coast states

Mississippi and Louisiana declare state of emergency, and New Orleans put on alert as tropical storm gathers strength Mississippi declared a state of emergency in seven counties on Friday as it prepares for tropical storm Lee. The storm has formed in the waters off Louisiana and is expected to unleash torrential rains along the Gulf coast over the Labor Day weekend. Some areas could receive up to 20 inches of rainfall. Louisiana has also declared a state of emergency, expecting flash flooding. In New Orleans, mayor Mitch Landrieu has taken similar measures for the city. The US national weather service has warned of “torrential tropical rains” for several days. The US army corps of engineers in New Orleans is monitoring developments but does not plan on closing any flood control structures yet, a spokesman said. Tropical storm warnings are in effect from Mississippi to Texas, including New Orleans, and flash flood warnings have been extended along the Alabama coast into the Florida Panhandle. The storm has halved the normal oil production from the Gulf of Mexico. The federal energy agency said it has evacuated 169 of the 617 manned production platforms and 16 of the 62 drilling rigs. The storm is also tantalisingly close to Texas but not close enough to alleviate the state’s worst drought since the 1950s. Lee is the 12th named storm of the Atlantic hurricane season. Storm watchers were also monitoring hurricane Katia, spinning in open waters 705 miles (1,134kms) east of the Leeward Islands and moving west-northwest at 14mph. It regained hurricane strength with maximum sustained winds of 75mph on Friday. The storm is expected to grow in strength but it is too early to say it will hit the US. There was also a slow-moving low pressure system about 450 miles south of Halifax, Nova Scotia, that could turn into a tropical cyclone in the next two days. The new storm warnings come days after the US east coast was hit by hurricane Irene, which caused major damage from North Carolina to New England. Natural disasters and extreme weather United States Louisiana Mississippi Hurricane Irene guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Obama backs down on tighter smog regulations

Environmental groups dismayed as president – under pressure from GOP – delays enacting stricter standards until 2013 Barack Obama has bowed to pressure from Republicans in Congress to postpone plans to introduce tighter controls over smog-producing companies. The decision provoked expressions of dismay among environmental groups campaigning for cleaner air. The retreat will add to the growing perception among voters that Obama is a weak president, reluctant to stand up to the Republicans. Obama had insisted he was intent on pushing ahead with tougher rules to force businesses to reduce concentrations of ground-level ozone. But Republicans argued it would increase the burden on businesses at a time when they are struggling and could lead to job losses. The Republican House majority leader, Eric Cantor, had described the proposed regulations as “job-killers”. It is another victory for the Republicans, who only control the House of Representatives but have managed to dictate much of the political agenda in the Democratic-controlled White House and Senate. Republicans, who return to Congress from holiday next week, paralysed Washington in the weeks running up to the summer break by threatening to vote against raising the country’s debt ceiling, forcing Obama to concede substantial spending cuts. The Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, hailed Obama’s latest climbdown on Friday. “The president took a step today that highlights the devastating impact on jobs that has been created by this administration’s regulatory overreach. This action alone will prevent more job losses than any speech the president has given,” McConnell said. One of McConnell’s Senate colleagues, John Barrasso, echoed him: “Job creators scored a major victory today in the fight against Washington’s red tape.” Democrats in Congress saw it as a setback. Ed Markey, a Democratic congressman on the House natural resources committee, said: “I am disappointed that the president chose to further delay important clean-air protections that would have helped to prevent respiratory and cardiac disease in thousands of Americans.”Obama had promised to replace weak air-control standards introduced by George W Bush. In a statement, Obama said on Friday the changes would have to be delayed until 2013, after the White House election in November next year. He cited the impact on business as the reason for the delay. Obama insisted he remained committed to the environment. “At the same time, I have continued to underscore the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty, particularly as our economy continues to recover,” he said. His decision overrules the advice of the federal government’s Environmental Protection Agency, a body treated with derision by Republicans, who see it as an embodiment of “big government”. In his statement, Obama told the head of the EPA, Lisa Jackson, to withdraw the proposal to tighten standards. The EPA’s independent panel of advisers earlier this year unanimously agreed that public health would benefit from the introduction of higher standards. Jackson had said the changes would have helped prevent as many as 12,000 premature deaths a year and save $100bn (£61.6bn) in health costs. The new rules would have forced companies to reduce emissions of certain chemicals that help create smog. Dow Chemical said the changes would cost as much as $90bn. Earthjustice, which has launched legal actions aimed at tackling smog-producers, expressed disappointment. Martin Hayden, the group’s vice-president, said: “The Obama administration knows the heavy cost of smog pollution but has made the terrible decision to leave outdated, weak standards in place, leaving thousands of Americans who suffer from lung and breathing problems at the mercy of this dirty air.” Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters, said: “The Obama administration is caving to big polluters at the expense of protecting the air we breathe. This is a huge win for corporate polluters and huge loss for public health.” US domestic policy Barack Obama Pollution Obama administration Activism Republicans Democrats United States US politics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

Click here to view this media My buddy, comedian John Fugelsang, is filling in for Stephanie Miller while she’s on vacation. Friday morning, Fugelsang had on your favorite Crooks and Liars managing editor (favorite or at least in the top three*), yours truly. It was an all out riot. I’ll be calling in a bunch next week too. So tune in! Also, yes, Fugelsang is married – so stop asking. *Crooks and Liars has had only three managing editors.

Continue reading …
China’s village of the bachelors: no wives in sight in remote settlement

Surplus of males caused by preference for sons means poor subsistence farmers have no chance of finding a mate He wants a wife, of course. But ask what kind of woman he seeks and Duan Biansheng looks perplexed. “I don’t have any requirements at all,” said the 35-year-old farmer. “I would be satisfied with just a wife.” His prospects of finding one, he added, are “almost zero”. There are dozens of single men in Banzhushan village, perched high on a remote mountain peak in central Hunan province – and not one unattached woman of marriageable age. Tens of millions of men across China face a future as bachelors. They are a source of pity, not envy, in a country where having children is central to life. Duan worries about growing old with no one to care for him. He chafes at the unhelpful pressure to wed from his parents and neighbours. The worst thing of all is the loneliness. This is the perverse outcome of the country’s longstanding preference for sons, and its sudden modernisation. Traditionally, the family line is passed via men. When a woman marries, she joins her husband’s family. Having a boy is a cultural and a pragmatic choice: you expect him to continue your lineage and support you in old age. The result has long been a surplus of men, because of female infanticide or excess female deaths through neglect. But in the last 20 years, the problem has exploded thanks to the spread of prenatal scans. Sex-selective abortion is illegal, but is clearly widely practised. The normal human birth ratio is 106 males for every 100 females. In China, that has risen to 118 boys. That means 30 to 50 million men will fail to find wives over the next two decades, according to Prof Li Shuzhuo of the institute for population and development studies at Xi’an Jiaotong University. It is equivalent to every male in the UK dying a bachelor. Experts have warned that these unmarried “bare branches” pose a threat to social stability. Some suggest that excess men leads to more crime and sexual violence; officials have warned of increased women trafficking. Already, women are kidnapped and sold as wives, as villagers in Banzhushan acknowledge. Other commentators say that while some women are at greater risk, many will benefit from better treatment due to their scarcity. “We can find no evidence, as yet, for a destabilising influence,” said Prof Therese Hesketh of the UCL’s institute of global health, who has co-authored a paper on the impact of the imbalance. Crime is not higher in high sex ratio areas, but it may be too early [to see the effects]. Women want to marry men with money or prospects. “This is not about men oppressing women – maybe the reverse. The situation is good for women.” Poverty is as much to blame for “bachelor villages” as the skewed sex ratio. Women can improve their status by “marrying up”; men are rarely able to do so. Girls born in poor areas leave and outsiders stay away. “Even though there are girls from this village, and we grew up together, they know they can have a better life outside,” said Duan. In late summer, Banzhushan – “chestnut bamboo mountain” – is mesmerisingly beautiful. Large brown butterflies flutter among the tallow trees as you gaze down into deep valleys. But it is simply too remote to be a good home, even to its 300 residents. They struggle to grow enough potatoes, maize and rice to feed themselves. Selling wood helps, but incomes are just 300-400 yuan (£30-40) a year, compared with 5,900 yuan for the average rural resident. Pieces of plastic and cardboard flap across the glass-free windows of tatty brick houses. In winter, thick snows can cut off the village for two weeks at a time. Conditions here are far better than 20 years ago. The long, steep path to the village has been bulldozed into a road and there is electricity, mobile phone and TV coverage. The government has even built a two-storey community centre, shining white amid the pines and bamboo. But these developments have worsened the predicament for bachelors. It is easier to learn about the outside world and easier to move away, and local improvements have been far outpaced by the rapid changes elsewhere. “Thirty or 40 years ago, girls from the valley were willing to marry up here,” said Jin Shixiu, 54. “Everyone was poor and hungry. Transport was bad everywhere. Now the roads down there are better but up here, it’s still the same. Some guys even met women outside, but when they came and saw our houses and how poor we are, they just went away.” Jin longs for a grandchild – “everyone else is holding theirs” – but says she does not dare to hope for one. She encouraged her two sons to move to Shenzhen in search of money and wives but her eldest, now 32, is still single. Even when men become migrant workers, they lack the education to find decent jobs, said the village’s party secretary, Jin Yisong. “It is still very hard to help these men find wives. I really don’t know how to do it,” he said. Duan’s eldest brother took the rare step of marrying into another village, moving away to join his bride’s family. The next eldest brother is working as a migrant labourer, but at 40 has yet to find a wife. His sister married a man from a richer, lower-lying area. Only Duan is left to look after his parents. “Even if I could persuade them to move down, we wouldn’t have money to build a house or land to grow crops,” he said. “After they pass away I will be too old to get married. I don’t think there’s any hope for me.” But he does not blame himself, he said. There is little he can do. “Even though there’s pressure, and people gossip behind my back, I don’t see it as really aimed at me. There are tens of us in this situation.” Home is where the heart is It is a truth universally acknowledged in China that a single man must be in want of a house. “Everyone complains that the pressure is huge,” said economist Zhang Xiaobo. “If you ask people what the important indicators are in the marriage market, 75% say owning a house is the most important factor.” Zhang and co-author Shang-Jin Wei, of Columbia University, believe China’s skewed sex ratio is pushing up property prices and leading to “competitive saving” as the parents of boys vie to buy better property. Zhang, of the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, cites the example of a farmer in Guizhou province who was selling his blood to pay for a large new house. It was, thought the man, the only chance of finding his son a bride. “It is totally wasteful. Almost all the young men or women go out as migrant workers,” said Zhang. “They build a two-storey or three-storey house, but the second floor can be totally unfurnished. “It is in a remote mountainous area which in a few decades will probably be a national park. “And there’s no property market in rural villages because land is communally owned. “That was when I realised how strong an impact there was.” said Zhang. A controversial new decision from the country’s top court – giving the spouse who buys a house before marriage the right to keep it after divorce – may help change attitudes. Zhang said that in cities like Beijing, a growing number of couples pool resources anyway: prices are too high for one set of parents to cover the cost. Additional research by Han Cheng China Population Marriage Poverty Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
China’s village of the bachelors: no wives in sight in remote settlement

Surplus of males caused by preference for sons means poor subsistence farmers have no chance of finding a mate He wants a wife, of course. But ask what kind of woman he seeks and Duan Biansheng looks perplexed. “I don’t have any requirements at all,” said the 35-year-old farmer. “I would be satisfied with just a wife.” His prospects of finding one, he added, are “almost zero”. There are dozens of single men in Banzhushan village, perched high on a remote mountain peak in central Hunan province – and not one unattached woman of marriageable age. Tens of millions of men across China face a future as bachelors. They are a source of pity, not envy, in a country where having children is central to life. Duan worries about growing old with no one to care for him. He chafes at the unhelpful pressure to wed from his parents and neighbours. The worst thing of all is the loneliness. This is the perverse outcome of the country’s longstanding preference for sons, and its sudden modernisation. Traditionally, the family line is passed via men. When a woman marries, she joins her husband’s family. Having a boy is a cultural and a pragmatic choice: you expect him to continue your lineage and support you in old age. The result has long been a surplus of men, because of female infanticide or excess female deaths through neglect. But in the last 20 years, the problem has exploded thanks to the spread of prenatal scans. Sex-selective abortion is illegal, but is clearly widely practised. The normal human birth ratio is 106 males for every 100 females. In China, that has risen to 118 boys. That means 30 to 50 million men will fail to find wives over the next two decades, according to Prof Li Shuzhuo of the institute for population and development studies at Xi’an Jiaotong University. It is equivalent to every male in the UK dying a bachelor. Experts have warned that these unmarried “bare branches” pose a threat to social stability. Some suggest that excess men leads to more crime and sexual violence; officials have warned of increased women trafficking. Already, women are kidnapped and sold as wives, as villagers in Banzhushan acknowledge. Other commentators say that while some women are at greater risk, many will benefit from better treatment due to their scarcity. “We can find no evidence, as yet, for a destabilising influence,” said Prof Therese Hesketh of the UCL’s institute of global health, who has co-authored a paper on the impact of the imbalance. Crime is not higher in high sex ratio areas, but it may be too early [to see the effects]. Women want to marry men with money or prospects. “This is not about men oppressing women – maybe the reverse. The situation is good for women.” Poverty is as much to blame for “bachelor villages” as the skewed sex ratio. Women can improve their status by “marrying up”; men are rarely able to do so. Girls born in poor areas leave and outsiders stay away. “Even though there are girls from this village, and we grew up together, they know they can have a better life outside,” said Duan. In late summer, Banzhushan – “chestnut bamboo mountain” – is mesmerisingly beautiful. Large brown butterflies flutter among the tallow trees as you gaze down into deep valleys. But it is simply too remote to be a good home, even to its 300 residents. They struggle to grow enough potatoes, maize and rice to feed themselves. Selling wood helps, but incomes are just 300-400 yuan (£30-40) a year, compared with 5,900 yuan for the average rural resident. Pieces of plastic and cardboard flap across the glass-free windows of tatty brick houses. In winter, thick snows can cut off the village for two weeks at a time. Conditions here are far better than 20 years ago. The long, steep path to the village has been bulldozed into a road and there is electricity, mobile phone and TV coverage. The government has even built a two-storey community centre, shining white amid the pines and bamboo. But these developments have worsened the predicament for bachelors. It is easier to learn about the outside world and easier to move away, and local improvements have been far outpaced by the rapid changes elsewhere. “Thirty or 40 years ago, girls from the valley were willing to marry up here,” said Jin Shixiu, 54. “Everyone was poor and hungry. Transport was bad everywhere. Now the roads down there are better but up here, it’s still the same. Some guys even met women outside, but when they came and saw our houses and how poor we are, they just went away.” Jin longs for a grandchild – “everyone else is holding theirs” – but says she does not dare to hope for one. She encouraged her two sons to move to Shenzhen in search of money and wives but her eldest, now 32, is still single. Even when men become migrant workers, they lack the education to find decent jobs, said the village’s party secretary, Jin Yisong. “It is still very hard to help these men find wives. I really don’t know how to do it,” he said. Duan’s eldest brother took the rare step of marrying into another village, moving away to join his bride’s family. The next eldest brother is working as a migrant labourer, but at 40 has yet to find a wife. His sister married a man from a richer, lower-lying area. Only Duan is left to look after his parents. “Even if I could persuade them to move down, we wouldn’t have money to build a house or land to grow crops,” he said. “After they pass away I will be too old to get married. I don’t think there’s any hope for me.” But he does not blame himself, he said. There is little he can do. “Even though there’s pressure, and people gossip behind my back, I don’t see it as really aimed at me. There are tens of us in this situation.” Home is where the heart is It is a truth universally acknowledged in China that a single man must be in want of a house. “Everyone complains that the pressure is huge,” said economist Zhang Xiaobo. “If you ask people what the important indicators are in the marriage market, 75% say owning a house is the most important factor.” Zhang and co-author Shang-Jin Wei, of Columbia University, believe China’s skewed sex ratio is pushing up property prices and leading to “competitive saving” as the parents of boys vie to buy better property. Zhang, of the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington, cites the example of a farmer in Guizhou province who was selling his blood to pay for a large new house. It was, thought the man, the only chance of finding his son a bride. “It is totally wasteful. Almost all the young men or women go out as migrant workers,” said Zhang. “They build a two-storey or three-storey house, but the second floor can be totally unfurnished. “It is in a remote mountainous area which in a few decades will probably be a national park. “And there’s no property market in rural villages because land is communally owned. “That was when I realised how strong an impact there was.” said Zhang. A controversial new decision from the country’s top court – giving the spouse who buys a house before marriage the right to keep it after divorce – may help change attitudes. Zhang said that in cities like Beijing, a growing number of couples pool resources anyway: prices are too high for one set of parents to cover the cost. Additional research by Han Cheng China Population Marriage Poverty Tania Branigan guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libya: Gaddafi’s army of mercenaries face backlash

Many black Africans have been arrested and accused of fighting for dictator, but claim they were press-ganged Earlier this year, as revolution and siege ground Tripoli to a halt, Mehdi Hassan knew where to look for work. He would drive his taxi to a roundabout in the south-west of the capital and wait for foreigners who had arrived with the name of a destination, but had no idea how to get there. “The cigarette factory,” he said. “That’s all they had to say.” Hassan drove each of the men – there were around six over a three-week period – to a warehouse behind the giant, government-run tobacco plant in western Tripoli. The site was well known: an industrial plant, protected by military guards, which had become a cash cow for the Gaddafi regime. “I was always told to go round here,” he said as he retraced the route this week, down a long straight road inside the factory’s high wall. “There were soldiers along the way and they pointed me towards that white building. Only one of the men I took there told me why he had come. The others couldn’t speak Arabic. He said I am here to fight for Gaddafi.” The building, like almost every other government facility in town had been ransacked and abandoned. Three huge sacks of rice sat amid broken glass, an empty weapons crate and strewn green uniforms. A sign on the wall said: “God, Muammar and Libya only.” But there was little else left to prove this place was what many in town believe it to have been – a processing centre for mercenaries, who threw in their lot with a dictator. Mehdi and other drivers around Tripoli are adamant. “It was very clear what it was,” he said of the scene he saw in March. “They weren’t even trying to hide it. There were around 100 men there and all of them were African. The Libyan soldiers were trying to speak to them in English.” In the 13 days since Gaddafi’s security forces were ousted, finding out how – and by whom – this totalitarian state was held together for so long has become an obsession for Tripoli’s brutalised residents as well as the city’s new guard, which rode into town seeking vengeance as much as a new beginning. What began early last week as a series of security sweeps to uncover the remnants of Gaddafi’s loyalists has edged towards a larger and more troubling persecution. It is not a good time to be a sub-Saharan African here. It is an especially poor time to be black and in hospital with a gunshot wound. A tour of the capital’s overworked hospitals over the past fortnight revealed sizable numbers of such men in beds alongside soldiers from Gaddafi’s ousted army. How they got there is an issue of much conjecture. “I swear by God I was walking in the street when I was shot,” said a Senegalese man, Ali Senegal, in Mitiga hospital. A bullet had entered the right side of his neck and shattered his jaw. A Gaddafi soldier in a bed opposite spoke up. “You were a sniper and you know you were,” he said. Senegal looked horrified and alone. Even if he was telling the truth, there is little chance that he will be believed. In the next room, a second man from Niger had just been brought in from a triage centre with a gaping wound to his right leg. “I am a mechanic,” he said angrily. “I have been working in Abu Selim for three years.” Both men had the misfortune to be injured in a battle that raged on 26 August in the staunchly loyalist neighbourhood just south of Gaddafi’s Bab al-Azazia compound. In the eyes of the doctors treating them, they had no good reason for being in Abu Selim. But at least here, the men can expect to be fed, given water and have their wounds tended to. The street outside is not proving as kind. Across Tripoli, thousands of black Africans no longer enjoy the status bestowed on them under Gaddafi, when hundreds of thousands were welcomed over the past 25 years and given work permits or citizenship. At least several thousand have been detained in the past fortnight on suspicion of being mercenaries. Many thousands more have fled or are in the process of doing so. Yet more still remain holed up in small groups in Tripoli neighbourhoods too frightened to venture out. At Mitiga hospital two badly wounded men, one a Tuareg tribesman and another from Chad, walked gingerly into the emergency ward, wincing with every step. They had been staying together in a private home, not willing to seek help for fear of what might happen to them. “We were in the wrong place at the wrong time,” said the Tuareg man. “Help us.” Hundreds of thousands of Africans fled Libya to their home countries, mainly Chad, Mali, Niger, Sudan and Somalia in the early days of the revolution in late-February and March. Yet there is evidence that as they left, small numbers of men from the same countries were travelling in the other direction. Late last week at Abu Selim hospital, Dr Sami, a trauma surgeon, walked the Guardian around the grounds. Every blood-caked trolley from inside the building had been wheeled outside into the scorching sunlight because the hospital was being disinfected in an effort to cleanse the stain and scent of death caused by so many bodies. Sami took us to a hut near the hospital entrance, where cleaners had kept a memento – a wallet-sized card issued to a man from Chad. On one side it said in Arabic and English: “Carry this with you at all times and you will be safe.” On the other side it said: “I am here to protect the king of kings.” Sami said: “This is what was given to the mercenaries. There were dozens like this. We had many, many of them in this hospital in the past few days. Most couldn’t speak Arabic, or English. They would just point at their injuries. They didn’t want to be admitted even if they were in agonising pain. Most of the bodies we had here were black Africans. And most of them were not claimed by anyone.” In a second hospital, Shara Zaweya, in the centre of town, Dr Ghassem Barouni has also been treating suspected African fighters. He held up a necklace of one man – a Tuareg tribesman – who claimed to hold Libyan nationality and said: “He believed this was going to protect him from bullets. He was still very loyal to Gaddafi, even after all this death. “It is 200% true that there were mercenaries here fighting for Gaddafi,” he said. “Many of them came just for that purpose. But there are others who have been here for a long time. They were allowed to work here and they were given benefits. But there was a price to pay for that. When the time came they were expected to fight.” Sami’s account has been supported by interviews with many other officials over the past week who suggest an unknown number of non-military men took up arms to support Gaddafi in the dying days of his regime. Some were compelled to do so. Others apparently volunteered. In a police station in Tripoli, where 34 alleged soldiers of fortune are being held, Abdalla Beid, 31, from Niger, said he had been living in Libya for seven years and working as a cleaner. He claimed he was recently deceived into joining Gaddafi’s army with the promise of a job as a security guard for 400 dinars a month. “A Libyan man came to Sabha and said there is a job in Tripoli providing security for a house but he needs five people,” he said. “He took us to Tripoli and put us in a house. Then he said, ‘This job is not a security job. Now we are fighting for Libya. We need people to fight the rats.’ “He tried to give us guns. He tried to force us to do the job. He said, ‘I brought you here to do this job and you have to do it, whether you like the job or not.’ I tried to refuse. He said, ‘If you refuse, I will kill you.’ One man, who was from Chad, agreed to fight but the rest of us refused. He locked us in a room for six days. Then he drove us outside and, on the same day, I was caught.” The desperate and savage last days of Gaddafi’s 42 years in power are rapidly recasting Libya’s historical association with Africa and lay bare the often cynical relationship Gaddafi had with the people he championed. In the wake of the regime has come resentment and a current of racism that Libya’s new leaders have vowed will not become entrenched. “Some people chose to fight,” said Winston Emerson Adango, who is trying to leave Libya to return to Niger. “But people like me just want to live.” Libya Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest Muammar Gaddafi Martin Chulov David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Libya: Gaddafi’s army of mercenaries face backlash

Many black Africans have been arrested and accused of fighting for dictator, but claim they were press-ganged Earlier this year, as revolution and siege ground Tripoli to a halt, Mehdi Hassan knew where to look for work. He would drive his taxi to a roundabout in the south-west of the capital and wait for foreigners who had arrived with the name of a destination, but had no idea how to get there. “The cigarette factory,” he said. “That’s all they had to say.” Hassan drove each of the men – there were around six over a three-week period – to a warehouse behind the giant, government-run tobacco plant in western Tripoli. The site was well known: an industrial plant, protected by military guards, which had become a cash cow for the Gaddafi regime. “I was always told to go round here,” he said as he retraced the route this week, down a long straight road inside the factory’s high wall. “There were soldiers along the way and they pointed me towards that white building. Only one of the men I took there told me why he had come. The others couldn’t speak Arabic. He said I am here to fight for Gaddafi.” The building, like almost every other government facility in town had been ransacked and abandoned. Three huge sacks of rice sat amid broken glass, an empty weapons crate and strewn green uniforms. A sign on the wall said: “God, Muammar and Libya only.” But there was little else left to prove this place was what many in town believe it to have been – a processing centre for mercenaries, who threw in their lot with a dictator. Mehdi and other drivers around Tripoli are adamant. “It was very clear what it was,” he said of the scene he saw in March. “They weren’t even trying to hide it. There were around 100 men there and all of them were African. The Libyan soldiers were trying to speak to them in English.” In the 13 days since Gaddafi’s security forces were ousted, finding out how – and by whom – this totalitarian state was held together for so long has become an obsession for Tripoli’s brutalised residents as well as the city’s new guard, which rode into town seeking vengeance as much as a new beginning. What began early last week as a series of security sweeps to uncover the remnants of Gaddafi’s loyalists has edged towards a larger and more troubling persecution. It is not a good time to be a sub-Saharan African here. It is an especially poor time to be black and in hospital with a gunshot wound. A tour of the capital’s overworked hospitals over the past fortnight revealed sizable numbers of such men in beds alongside soldiers from Gaddafi’s ousted army. How they got there is an issue of much conjecture. “I swear by God I was walking in the street when I was shot,” said a Senegalese man, Ali Senegal, in Mitiga hospital. A bullet had entered the right side of his neck and shattered his jaw. A Gaddafi soldier in a bed opposite spoke up. “You were a sniper and you know you were,” he said. Senegal looked horrified and alone. Even if he was telling the truth, there is little chance that he will be believed. In the next room, a second man from Niger had just been brought in from a triage centre with a gaping wound to his right leg. “I am a mechanic,” he said angrily. “I have been working in Abu Selim for three years.” Both men had the misfortune to be injured in a battle that raged on 26 August in the staunchly loyalist neighbourhood just south of Gaddafi’s Bab al-Azazia compound. In the eyes of the doctors treating them, they had no good reason for being in Abu Selim. But at least here, the men can expect to be fed, given water and have their wounds tended to. The street outside is not proving as kind. Across Tripoli, thousands of black Africans no longer enjoy the status bestowed on them under Gaddafi, when hundreds of thousands were welcomed over the past 25 years and given work permits or citizenship. At least several thousand have been detained in the past fortnight on suspicion of being mercenaries. Many thousands more have fled or are in the process of doing so. Yet more still remain holed up in small groups in Tripoli neighbourhoods too frightened to venture out. At Mitiga hospital two badly wounded men, one a Tuareg tribesman and another from Chad, walked gingerly into the emergency ward, wincing with every step. They had been staying together in a private home, not willing to seek help for fear of what might happen to them. “We were in the wrong place at the wrong time,” said the Tuareg man. “Help us.” Hundreds of thousands of Africans fled Libya to their home countries, mainly Chad, Mali, Niger, Sudan and Somalia in the early days of the revolution in late-February and March. Yet there is evidence that as they left, small numbers of men from the same countries were travelling in the other direction. Late last week at Abu Selim hospital, Dr Sami, a trauma surgeon, walked the Guardian around the grounds. Every blood-caked trolley from inside the building had been wheeled outside into the scorching sunlight because the hospital was being disinfected in an effort to cleanse the stain and scent of death caused by so many bodies. Sami took us to a hut near the hospital entrance, where cleaners had kept a memento – a wallet-sized card issued to a man from Chad. On one side it said in Arabic and English: “Carry this with you at all times and you will be safe.” On the other side it said: “I am here to protect the king of kings.” Sami said: “This is what was given to the mercenaries. There were dozens like this. We had many, many of them in this hospital in the past few days. Most couldn’t speak Arabic, or English. They would just point at their injuries. They didn’t want to be admitted even if they were in agonising pain. Most of the bodies we had here were black Africans. And most of them were not claimed by anyone.” In a second hospital, Shara Zaweya, in the centre of town, Dr Ghassem Barouni has also been treating suspected African fighters. He held up a necklace of one man – a Tuareg tribesman – who claimed to hold Libyan nationality and said: “He believed this was going to protect him from bullets. He was still very loyal to Gaddafi, even after all this death. “It is 200% true that there were mercenaries here fighting for Gaddafi,” he said. “Many of them came just for that purpose. But there are others who have been here for a long time. They were allowed to work here and they were given benefits. But there was a price to pay for that. When the time came they were expected to fight.” Sami’s account has been supported by interviews with many other officials over the past week who suggest an unknown number of non-military men took up arms to support Gaddafi in the dying days of his regime. Some were compelled to do so. Others apparently volunteered. In a police station in Tripoli, where 34 alleged soldiers of fortune are being held, Abdalla Beid, 31, from Niger, said he had been living in Libya for seven years and working as a cleaner. He claimed he was recently deceived into joining Gaddafi’s army with the promise of a job as a security guard for 400 dinars a month. “A Libyan man came to Sabha and said there is a job in Tripoli providing security for a house but he needs five people,” he said. “He took us to Tripoli and put us in a house. Then he said, ‘This job is not a security job. Now we are fighting for Libya. We need people to fight the rats.’ “He tried to give us guns. He tried to force us to do the job. He said, ‘I brought you here to do this job and you have to do it, whether you like the job or not.’ I tried to refuse. He said, ‘If you refuse, I will kill you.’ One man, who was from Chad, agreed to fight but the rest of us refused. He locked us in a room for six days. Then he drove us outside and, on the same day, I was caught.” The desperate and savage last days of Gaddafi’s 42 years in power are rapidly recasting Libya’s historical association with Africa and lay bare the often cynical relationship Gaddafi had with the people he championed. In the wake of the regime has come resentment and a current of racism that Libya’s new leaders have vowed will not become entrenched. “Some people chose to fight,” said Winston Emerson Adango, who is trying to leave Libya to return to Niger. “But people like me just want to live.” Libya Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest Muammar Gaddafi Martin Chulov David Smith guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Anti-abortion bid in disarray as critics rally

MPs back compromise amendment as Nadine Dorries comes under pressure to reveal allies The campaign to toughen Britain’s abortion laws was losing momentum as Tory MPs on Friday backed a rival amendment and questions emerged about links to Christian counselling services that might benefit from the proposed reform. Legislation initially proposed by Nadine Dorries and Frank Field would strip abortion providers such as Marie Stopes of their counselling role and hand it over to “independent” organisations not linked to abortion clinics. But Dorries confirmed to the Guardian that the organisations supporting her campaign include a “crisis pregnancy centre” (CPC) – a type of advisory service often linked to religious anti-abortion activists. Dorries is coming under pressure to reveal how her allies are funded. One of the most vocal public supporters of the Right to Know campaign backing the Dorries amendment to the healthcare bill is the lobby group Christian Concern, which is linked to a wealthy US evangelical organisation, the Alliance Defence Fund. Meanwhile, political support has been ebbing away since fellow Tory MP Louise Mensch tabled a compromise amendment, which would allow women to choose whether they received counselling from faith-backed pregnancy centres or existing charities such as the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. The public health minister, Anne Milton, took the unprecedented step of emailing all MPs to set out the government’s voting decision. Although emphasising that the vote on the amendment would be free, she wrote: “On the issue of preventing abortion services from offering counselling, we disagree with the [Dorries] amendment. If pressed to a vote, my ministerial colleagues in the Department of Health and I will vote against the amendments. This is because the amendments exclude existing abortion services from offering counselling.” Conservative MPs were shocked by the letter, saying its statement of the government’s preferred view was “unheard of” ahead of a free vote and reflected the state of coalition relations, with the Liberal Democrats “running the show”. Dorries insisted she would go ahead with her amendment to the bill, despite its waning parliamentary support. Dorries and Field want to offer women the option of independent counselling, delivered by an organisation other than the abortion provider. Dorries said she did not want it to be a religious organisation, but “one of the 36,000 BACP [British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy] professional counsellors across the country who are prohibited at present from working with pregnant women”. However, healthcare organisations and pro-choice campaigners are concerned the gap would be filled from the ranks of the hundreds of CPCs, which are often overseen by religious anti-abortion groups. Dorries confirmed that her campaign was being advised by Dr Peter Saunders of the Christian Medical Fellowship, a lobby group which says that more than 4,000 doctors are members, and “a number” of other organisations, including “one that runs crisis pregnancy centres”, but she refused to either name them or describe their role. The Dorries-Field amendment is expected to be selected by the Speaker when parliament returns from recess, and one of the first items on the parliamentary agenda is the health and social care bill on Tuesday and Wednesday. The prime minister, David Cameron, was at first said to be sympathetic to Dorries’s view that women should be offered independent advice, but he became persuaded by the view of campaigners that the planned amendment would prevent abortion providers such as Marie Stopes from giving counselling. The Department of Health has instead announced a consultation on the range of counsellors, and Lib Dems said they would be seeking to influence this. Despite Cameron withdrawing his support, on Friday Dorries insisted she would push ahead but did not appear to be gathering the support of her colleagues. Two Conservative MPs said they would be likely to support the Dorries-Field amendment, if selected by the Speaker, but they said the numbers voting in its favour would be low. However, they suggested the mood on the backbenches would be grim on account of No 10 conducting what they called a “secret whipping operation”, letting it be known that the prime minister would vote against Dorries’s amendment thereby piling pressure on his backbenchers to follow his lead and vote it down. Mensch’s amendment seeks to find a compromise by increasing the range of bodies offering advice but not ruling out Marie Stopes. She proposes giving women considering an abortion the choice of getting independent counselling on the NHS. Mensch’s amendment would allow a woman to choose a referral to any counselling service, including Marie Stopes and British Pregnancy Advisory Service – the two providers explicitly ruled out by the Dorries-Field amendment. Mensch had wanted her proposal to mean that any BACP-accredited counsellor who is an abortion provider, is a faith group or is ideological would be labelled as such, allowing women to make an informed decision, but she was unable to include that. Instead, she intends to lobby the Department of Health on this point. A Liberal Democrat MP, Julian Huppert, tabled an amendment seeking to strengthen the status quo. It read: “All organisations offering information or advice in relation to unplanned pregnancy choices must follow current evidence-based guidance produced by a professional medical organisation specified by the secretary of state.” Crisis pregnancy centres are independent of the NHS and offer counselling on pregnancy choices, and sometimes free testing and other services. Some are independently run, as charities, often with church backing, while others are part of more established networks, such as that run by Life, a charity opposed to abortion in all circumstances. The largest network – more than 100 CPCs – is run by CareConfidential. Neither Dorries nor Field, nor the Right to Know campaign – which was set up to lobby for support for the amendment – will reveal the details of who is involved with Right to Know and who has funded it. It has paid for a poll of MPs carried out by the private pollsters ComRes as part of a lobbying operation. MPs who are opposing the amendment have called on Dorries to reveal the full sources of the backing for the campaign. Luciana Berger, the Labour and Cooperative MP for Liverpool Wavertree, said: “It’s only right that people know where the resources have come from in advance of the vote.” Abortion Conservatives Health policy Health Women Public services policy Ben Quinn Polly Curtis Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …