Home » Posts tagged with » media (Page 120)
Barack Obama’s jobs speech faces Republican boycott

Multibillion-dollar jobs plan faces stiff opposition from Republicans who are already branding it a re-election gimmick Republicans have signalled their opposition to Barack Obama’s multibillion dollar jobs plan, even before he was due to unveil it in a crucial speech to a joint session of Congress. Republican members of Congress said on Thursday morning that, based on leaks to the media, there was nothing new in the speech, which would be just a rehash of proposals Obama has put forward since his days on the campaign trail in 2008. Some Republican members even announced publicly they intend to boycott the speech, a rare snub for a sitting president. The Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, dismissed Obama’s jobs plans as retreads. “What is surprising is the president’s apparent determination to apply the same government-driven policies that have already been tried and failed,” he said in a speech to the Senate. ‘”The definition of insanity, as Albert Einstein once famously put it, is to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different result. Frankly, I can’t think of a better description of anyone who thinks the solution to this problem is another stimulus. The first stimulus didn’t do it. Why would another one?” He added: “This isn’t a jobs plan. It’s a re-election plan.” Obama’s proposals, which will cost at least $300bn, include about $100bn in spending on construction of roads, bridges and other huge infrastructure projects as well as extra cash for states to prevent teachers, police and others being laid off. He is also proposing an extension of a payroll tax cut due to expire at the end of the year, an extension of unemployment benefit, and more training and subsidies for the long-term unemployed. The jobs plan is part of Obama’s attempt to reverse a rapid drop in the polls because of the 9.1% unemployment rate, up from the 7.8% when he took office in January 2009. A Gallup poll this week gave the president an approval rating of only 42%, perilously low for a president seeking re-election next year. Even though speeches by a president to a joint session of Congress are relatively rare, such is the polarisation in Washington that many Republicans said they intended to boycott it rather than participate in what they see as an election gimmick. The Republican Speaker, John Boehner, at a press conference in Congress on Thursday, urged his House colleagues not to mount a boycott, saying it would be disrespectful of the president. But Republican congressman Joe Walsh said speeches by the president at joint sessions of Congress should be saved for special occasions. It was time for action, not speeches. “You can’t lead this country by speeches,” Walsh said in an interview with CNN. The unhappiness of many Republicans is shared on the other side, with Democrats regarding Obama’s proposals as too timid and seeking a much more ambitious stimulus package. Fourteen million Americans are out of work, according to official figures . Almost all of Obama’s plans require congressional approval and he is to send the proposals to the Hill next week, setting up a third major clash with Republicans this year. A standoff between Republicans and the White House before the summer recess over the debt crisis left Washington paralysed for weeks, while earlier this year Republicans threatened to close down the federal government. House Republicans, reluctant to be cast as the villains, were in public unwilling to dismiss Obama’s plans out of hand. Boehner, at the press conference, said: “I’m hopeful that after the president gives his speech that we’ll be able to sit down, in a bipartisan way, and find common ground that will help improve our economy, and improve the job picture for the American people.” But behind the scenes, House Republicans, who voted against Obama’s first stimulus package and see little reason to vote for a second, were sceptical. A Republican congressional source said that if the president had been genuine about seeking a bipartisan approach he would have consulted them beforehand. The source said Boehner had written to the White House asking for a meeting this week but had not received a reply. If, as the White House expects, the Republicans boycott his speech, Obama is planning to go out on the road in the months ahead portraying his opponents as obstructionist. The president is to hold the first of a series of meetings on jobs in Richmond, Virginia, on Friday. Barack Obama Republicans US economy US elections 2012 United States Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Texas Show Down at GOP Debate: During a Commercial Perry Wags Finger in Paul’s Face

enlarge At last night’s debate, it seems there was a bit of a mostly-verbal confrontation between Ron Paul and Rick Perry during a commercial break, which the Ron Paul people are in full-throated protest over. Via Mediaite : According to Paul fansite RonPaul.com , here’s how it went down: During a commercial break at Wednesday’s Republican debate, Rick Perry and Ron Paul continued their spirited exchange on stage. Suddenly, Perry grabbed Ron Paul’s forearm while aggressively pointing his index finger towards the Congressman’s face. Alerted by Perry’s menacing gestures, Ron Paul’s bodyguard (front left) was standing by, ready to protect the Congressman. While it looks like it may have been a heated verbal exchange, I think it may be a tiny bit of hyperbole to call it “menacing.” Whatever happened in that moment, rest assured there was no space between the media and the candidates, and if anything had happened that was remotely interesting, someone would have heard it. I know this because I had hoped to be able to stay in the main debate room just a bit longer than five minutes, and try and capture some of those off-camera moments. It would have been simple enough to do, had I been allowed to stay, but alas, I didn’t have the right credentials and there were more cameras, reporters and other people in that room who did have them than you could shake a Texas-sized stick at. Nevertheless, I was able to capture some of my own “caption this” images in the time I was there. I was in the main debate room for about five minutes when the candidates came out to the stage and were introduced. First Cain and Huntsman, then Paul, Perry and Romney. I caught this rather interesting picture of the three of them together. enlarge Credit: Karoli Doesn’t Perry look like he just ate raw meat for dinner? All snarly and ready to go, he was. Romney looked a little surprised he was standing there, and I guess Ron Paul was looking down for his bodyguard? Or maybe he was just talking to someone down in front. Here’s John Huntsman and Herman Cain, looking reverent: enlarge Credit: Karoli There was a long pause — and I DO mean long — before Michele Bachmann made her entrance. She seems to have a thing for making delayed entrances, and yesterday was no exception. But finally she came onstage, with Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum following behind. How about these two as a Republican ticket? enlarge Credit: Karoli Seems like Bachmann is a little more relaxed with Newt than she is with Romney. She has just a little bit of a gritted-teeth-wildeyed-fiery stare in this one. enlarge Credit: Karoli In all of these pictures, some of the candidates seem to be missing something. That’s right. A FLAG PIN . Who are these unpatriotic pretenders who think they can get away with showing up at the shrine of Republican politics without a flag pin? How dare Rick Perry wear a pin that puts the Texas star on TOP of the American flag? I’ll bet those flag pin slackers don’t say the pledge of allegiance, either. When will the mainstream media ask them about it? When will we know the truth?

Continue reading …
Texas Show Down at GOP Debate: During a Commercial Perry Wags Finger in Paul’s Face

enlarge At last night’s debate, it seems there was a bit of a mostly-verbal confrontation between Ron Paul and Rick Perry during a commercial break, which the Ron Paul people are in full-throated protest over. Via Mediaite : According to Paul fansite RonPaul.com , here’s how it went down: During a commercial break at Wednesday’s Republican debate, Rick Perry and Ron Paul continued their spirited exchange on stage. Suddenly, Perry grabbed Ron Paul’s forearm while aggressively pointing his index finger towards the Congressman’s face. Alerted by Perry’s menacing gestures, Ron Paul’s bodyguard (front left) was standing by, ready to protect the Congressman. While it looks like it may have been a heated verbal exchange, I think it may be a tiny bit of hyperbole to call it “menacing.” Whatever happened in that moment, rest assured there was no space between the media and the candidates, and if anything had happened that was remotely interesting, someone would have heard it. I know this because I had hoped to be able to stay in the main debate room just a bit longer than five minutes, and try and capture some of those off-camera moments. It would have been simple enough to do, had I been allowed to stay, but alas, I didn’t have the right credentials and there were more cameras, reporters and other people in that room who did have them than you could shake a Texas-sized stick at. Nevertheless, I was able to capture some of my own “caption this” images in the time I was there. I was in the main debate room for about five minutes when the candidates came out to the stage and were introduced. First Cain and Huntsman, then Paul, Perry and Romney. I caught this rather interesting picture of the three of them together. enlarge Credit: Karoli Doesn’t Perry look like he just ate raw meat for dinner? All snarly and ready to go, he was. Romney looked a little surprised he was standing there, and I guess Ron Paul was looking down for his bodyguard? Or maybe he was just talking to someone down in front. Here’s John Huntsman and Herman Cain, looking reverent: enlarge Credit: Karoli There was a long pause — and I DO mean long — before Michele Bachmann made her entrance. She seems to have a thing for making delayed entrances, and yesterday was no exception. But finally she came onstage, with Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum following behind. How about these two as a Republican ticket? enlarge Credit: Karoli Seems like Bachmann is a little more relaxed with Newt than she is with Romney. She has just a little bit of a gritted-teeth-wildeyed-fiery stare in this one. enlarge Credit: Karoli In all of these pictures, some of the candidates seem to be missing something. That’s right. A FLAG PIN . Who are these unpatriotic pretenders who think they can get away with showing up at the shrine of Republican politics without a flag pin? How dare Rick Perry wear a pin that puts the Texas star on TOP of the American flag? I’ll bet those flag pin slackers don’t say the pledge of allegiance, either. When will the mainstream media ask them about it? When will we know the truth?

Continue reading …

If there is a standard liberal line on Ronald Reagan today, it is this bizarre notion that Reagan is so far left of the current Republican contenders that they'd rip him to pieces if he were alive. Today's case in point: Washington Post columnist/blogger Ezra Klein insists Reagan “would have been destroyed” on the stage last night, since he had such a deep pragmatic streak as president. Yes, that's the same president the media often portrayed during his two terms as an ultra-conservative nut. (Not so much Ezra Klein, who was born in 1984.) Klein wrote: There’s no doubt who won last night’s Republican presidential debate: Ronald Reagan. He even got a montage set to the Verve’s Bittersweet Symphony. But the funny thing is that if the actual Ronald Reagan had been on that stage defending his actual record , he would almost certainly have lost. In fact, he would have been destroyed. Klein trotted out the old line that Reagan raised taxes four times from 1982 to 1984, and his 1986 tax reform supposedly would have made Walter Mondale proud (so grumped old adviser William Niskanen). I want to be very clear: My point isn’t to suggest that Reagan was some closet liberal. This is still the president who signed one of the largest tax cuts in history. My point is to say Reagan was a conservative who was willing to compromise with reality. And that’s not something I heard a lot of on the stage last night. In this perfunctory exercise of How Wacky to the Right Are They?, Klein seemed unwilling to consider that perhaps a President Romney or Perry or Bachmann or Santorum would be more pragmatic once they sat down in the Oval and looked at the votes in Congress. After all, Barack Obama on the campaign trail in 2007 sounded a lot more radical than President Obama — especially on Iraq and the war on terror.

Continue reading …

If there is a standard liberal line on Ronald Reagan today, it is this bizarre notion that Reagan is so far left of the current Republican contenders that they'd rip him to pieces if he were alive. Today's case in point: Washington Post columnist/blogger Ezra Klein insists Reagan “would have been destroyed” on the stage last night, since he had such a deep pragmatic streak as president. Yes, that's the same president the media often portrayed during his two terms as an ultra-conservative nut. (Not so much Ezra Klein, who was born in 1984.) Klein wrote: There’s no doubt who won last night’s Republican presidential debate: Ronald Reagan. He even got a montage set to the Verve’s Bittersweet Symphony. But the funny thing is that if the actual Ronald Reagan had been on that stage defending his actual record , he would almost certainly have lost. In fact, he would have been destroyed. Klein trotted out the old line that Reagan raised taxes four times from 1982 to 1984, and his 1986 tax reform supposedly would have made Walter Mondale proud (so grumped old adviser William Niskanen). I want to be very clear: My point isn’t to suggest that Reagan was some closet liberal. This is still the president who signed one of the largest tax cuts in history. My point is to say Reagan was a conservative who was willing to compromise with reality. And that’s not something I heard a lot of on the stage last night. In this perfunctory exercise of How Wacky to the Right Are They?, Klein seemed unwilling to consider that perhaps a President Romney or Perry or Bachmann or Santorum would be more pragmatic once they sat down in the Oval and looked at the votes in Congress. After all, Barack Obama on the campaign trail in 2007 sounded a lot more radical than President Obama — especially on Iraq and the war on terror.

Continue reading …
More coordinated strike action planned over pension negotiations ‘charade’

PCS union leader Mark Serwotka gives warning after executive rules to stage second mass walkout Unions are preparing for a second mass walkout over public sector pension reforms, a union leader has warned. Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services union – which took part in coordinated strike action on 30 June alongside three education unions – laid out the prospect of further mass industrial unrest after the PCS executive ruled to take fresh strike action to force the government to “compromise” over the proposed reforms to pension schemes. Serwotka said he expected other unions to join a day of coordinated action “significantly” bigger than that in June, over pension negotiations which he described as nothing short of a “charade”. More than 10 unions could be involved in strikes in November, with industrial action continuing into 2012 if the dispute is not resolved, said Serwotka. The leader of the unaffiliated union said more targeted action on specific services was also likely, and warned of the possibility of a big impact if PCS members who issue passports and driving licences went on strike. Asked about the level of support across public sector unions for a national walkout, Serwotka said the magnitude of the one-day strike would become clear when the unions debate public sector pensions at the TUC congress in London next week. “We are moving towards a strike potentially involving millions,” he said. A number of other unions are threatening industrial action, including those representing firefighters, teachers and other civil servants. A meeting of union leaders will be held after the TUC congress to finalise details for a coordinated day of action. Serwotka said he expected the day of action to take place in mid to late November. Speaking ahead of a meeting on Thursday afternoon between union leaders and Francis Maude, the cabinet minister, and Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the Treasury, he described talks to date as “a farce with bells on”. “We are supposed to be in negotiations but to negotiate you should be prepared to compromise,” Serwotka told a press conference. “On plans to make people work longer, pay more and receive less they have not moved one jot.” He threw down the gauntlet to the government. “The government now has a choice. Either it can put its head in the sand and just sit back and do nothing while we are seeing bigger and bigger amounts of the public sector going on strike, or it can get down and negotiate. We’ve been clear all along in negotiations you have to compromise. We are prepared to do that, but they have not budged a single inch.” The cabinet office said was it committed to “genuine and meaningful dialogue” to achieve necessary reforms. “The government is committed to ongoing talks with the unions,” a spokesman said. “It is committed to keeping public service pensions among the best available but also recognises the need to address rising costs due to increased longevity. It is very disappointing that there has been another call for industrial action while these talks are ongoing. We hope the unions will recognise that rational discussion and open dialogue are more appropriate methods of reaching a solution that works to the benefit of all, rather than engaging in industrial action.” Serwotka said any actions will see unions gather around a mantra of “fair pensions for all”, in a nod to efforts to divide those working in the public and private sector over pension provision. He said the government’s attempt to “try to divide” by claiming that public sector workers had more generous pension schemes had only served to expose the “appalling level” of provision in the private sector. “The idea that in anyway the way forward is to put everybody at a lower level is completely wrong,” he said. “And therefore the petition we are working on with the unions is very clear: it’s about fair pensions for all, public and private.” And he insisted that any action taken by unions would register with wider public anger at government cuts. “The reason I think we got so much support on the 30th is that a lot of people recognised the arguments we made about pensions, but probably more than that, it’s because people welcome somebody is fighting back and standing up for what is going on. And in that sense, it’s fairly clear that this is about much more than pensions, because if we all lose our pensions, it follows the government will be even more emboldened to carry on with its austerity plan.” A lobby of parliament by seven education unions – including three who took action in June – over proposed reforms to the teachers’ pension scheme is due to take place on 26 October. Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said it would be the government’s “last chance” to “think again”. “Negotiations have so far made no progress,” she said. “There has still been no valuation of the teachers’ pension scheme, and the switch from RPI to CPI is already causing members to lose money. The lobby of parliament on 26 October by seven teachers’ unions is the last chance for the government to think again. If they do not do so further industrial action will be inevitable”. Trade unions Public sector pensions Public services policy Mark Serwotka Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
D Science Student Rick Perry Flunks Galileo Analogy

Click here to view this media This is great! Just keep this dude talking. We don’t even need Katie Couric – just put a mike in front of Texas Governor Rick Perry, and let him speak. If he were smarter he’d know how dumb he is – but he’s not. So he says things like he did at his first ever national debate, Wednesday night at the Reagan Library. This was after Jon Huntsman said, “Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I’m saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can’t run from science. We can’t run from mainstream conservative philosophy. We’ve got to win voters.” Yes. No applause from the L.L. Bean catalog audience. Silence on pro-science. A brave moment for Huntsman, fell flat (like the shape of the Earth). Then the question went to ” Crotch :” PERRY: Well, I do agree that there is — the science is — is not settled on this. The idea that we would put Americans’ economy at — at — at jeopardy based on scientific theory that’s not settled yet, to me, is just — is nonsense. I mean, it — I mean — and I tell somebody, I said, just because you have a group of scientists that have stood up and said here is the fact, Galileo got outvoted for a spell. Yes. Because zealot extremists doubted Galileo, the father of modern science (who, turns out, was right…and brilliant) – we should act like those zealot extremists?! What? Remember Perry’s Texas A&M transcripts are on the Internet . He got an AVERAGE D in science classes and C in history. But, like I said – if he were smarter – he’d be quieter. But he kept on digging: PERRY: But the fact is, to put America’s economic future in jeopardy, asking us to cut back in areas that would have monstrous economic impact on this country is not good economics and I will suggest to you is not necessarily good science. Find out what the science truly is before you start putting the American economy in jeopardy. HARRIS: Just to follow up quickly. Tell us how you’ve done that. Are there specific — specific scientists or specific theories that you’ve found especially compelling, as you… PERRY: Let me tell you what I find compelling, is what we’ve done in the state of Texas, using our ability to regulate our clean air. We cleaned up our air in the state of Texas, more than any other state in the nation during the decade. Nitrous oxide levels, down by 57 percent. Ozone levels down by 27 percent. Bonk. Texas has the worst pollution in the country . “Texas Soup” is Houston’s air. This sums it up for me. I tweeted this during the second half of the debate : BTW: I love Perry. He’s awesome. He’s like Palin without the charm, facts or brains. Love love love him. #reagandebate I mean it. Let’s give him the nomination already. But speaking of science and math (classes Perry should have dropped before getting a grade in them) – just to cleanse your pallet – I’d like to share what a reader sent me this morning. It’s his letter that was published in NYT : To the Editor: You do not study mathematics because it helps you build a bridge. You study mathematics because it is the poetry of the universe. Its beauty transcends mere things. JONATHAN DAVID FARLEY Orono, Me., Aug. 25, 2011 The writer is an associate professor of computer science at the University of Maine. Commie.

Continue reading …
Culture secretary criticises police questioning of Guardian reporter

Jeremy Hunt stresses difference between off-the-record briefings and payments to police revealed by phone-hacking investigation The culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has criticised the decision by police to question a Guardian journalist over alleged leaks from Scotland Yard’s phone-hacking inquiry. The cabinet minister told MPs: “There is an important difference between off-the-record briefing and the payment of money by or to the police in return for information. “Journalists must operate within the law, but, as the prime minister told the [parliamentary] liaison committee, as we go through this entire process we must be careful not to overreact in a way that would undermine the foundations of a free society.” Hunt was responding to a question by Tom Watson, the Labour MP for West Bromwich East, who said: “There is a world of difference between a journalist who bribes a police officer for information and a journalist who gets information from a police officer, freely given. The former corrodes our democracy, while the latter protects it.” Guardian journalist Amelia Hill, who part of the Guardian’s team reporting on the News of the World phone-hacking scandal, was questioned by police under caution several days ago in a move that has been condemned by the NUJ and media watchdog the Media Standards Trust. A 51-year-old detective was arrested last month in connection with alleged leaks from the Scotland Yard phone-hacking investigation. At the time there were reports that the officer had passed information to the Guardian. However, the newspaper said at the time it had “no comment to make on the sources of our journalism”. • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”. • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter at and Facebook . Phone hacking The Guardian Press freedom Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers James Robinson guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Soldier jailed indefinitely for raping three teenagers

Jonathan Haynes may be guilty of many more crimes, say police A soldier who raped three teenagers and tried to abduct two schoolgirls has been jailed indefinitely. Jonathan Haynes, 30, raped two of the teenagers after seizing them on the streets of a market town and attacked the third at a university hall of residence. Haynes, a lance corporal with the Royal Logistic Corps, tried to grab the two 14-year-old schoolgirls from a country lane. Haynes was given an indeterminate sentence for public protection and ordered to serve at least 11 years imprisonment – but was warned he may never be released. As he passed sentence, Judge Neil Ford QC, the recorder of Bristol, described Haynes as a “clever and cunning predator”. A jury was told that Haynes, who was based at a barracks near Chippenham in Wiltshire, meticulously planned his attacks. The first kidnap and rape happened in September 2009 in Chippenham as the 16-year-old victim made her way home from a night out. Just 13 days later he raped an 18-year-old student after forcing entry to halls of residence in Pontypridd, south Wales. The following February, he attempted to snatch the two schoolgirls late at night from a country lane near Chippenham. Weeks later Haynes kidnapped a 17-year-old girl off the streets of Chippenham and repeatedly raped her. Haynes did not realise that the hired car he was driving was fitted with a GPS tracking device. After his arrest, detectives were able to piece together his movements and establish that he had been cruising the streets of Chippenham during the early hours looking for victims, or “sharking”. One of his victims had the presence of mind to pull out some of her hair during her ordeal and push it down the car seat to prove she had been there. Haynes, of Northampton, was found guilty of rape, kidnap and attempted kidnap. Speaking after the hearing, Detective Chief Inspector Bob Hamlin, of Wiltshire police, said that there could be many more victims and that his team were examining other unsolved cases in the area. He said: “We are investigating more cases that are unsolved but it is hard to put a figure on just how many more offences this dangerous man could have committed. “He is one of the most evil men I’ve dealt with in 32 years of work. The horror the victims suffered can never be forgotten.” Crime Steven Morris guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Theresa May warns of gang disruption to London Olympics

Senior police and home secretary acknowledge that gangs in London’s East End may use Games as crime opportunity Senior Scotland Yard officers believe that gangs in London may seek to disrupt the Olympics. Theresa May, the home affairs secretary acknowledged there was a possibility that gangs prevalent in the London’s East End will use the Olympics as an opportunity for criminality. She said the team preparing the Olympics policing were now looking again to see what they could learn from the riots. A former police officer made the claim in private evidence to the home affairs select committee. The anonymous officer recently involved in Operation Trident, the Metropolitan police operation against black gun crime, has also disclosed he believed senior gang members known to the police have avoided arrest leaving younger opportunists to carry the can. May has portrayed the bulk of the rioting as the product of sheer criminality, but suggested ony 25% were juveniles, a lower figure than others have suggested. She also appeared to put a question mark over suggestions that as many as 75% of those that have been arrested will prove to have previous convictions, saying the numbers will shift, and prove to be different from area to area. “I’m absolutely clear that what underlay it was criminality”, she said. She conceded that it had been senior police officers who had decided to increase police numbers on the streets before a Cobra meeting on the Tuesday morning, and that she had not been instrumental in such a policy taken by the Metropolitan police management team on the Monday night. At one stage she gave the impression she was directing police operations, a suggestion the police deeply resented. But she revealed that on a conference call on Wednesday morning she did urge chief constables nationwide to follow the lead of the Metropolitan police to cancel all leave and to ask special constables to be put on standby. “I made it absolutely clear to chiefs up and down the country to follow the example of the Met.” Her criticism of police tactics was largely coded, saying: “The police were confronted by a situation that was unprecedented and activity was springing up far more quickly than they had seen before, and they were having to find ways to cope with that. They were trying to put in place what they believed that from their experience was policing that worked, but in the event on the Monday night it did not, they and they had to increase those numbers on the Tuesday. She also admitted that many people felt “those who were on the streets seemed to be in control of parts of the streets”. May said that investigating the involvement of gangs was likely to be completed by the end of October, but added that the level of gang involvement “possibly is not as high as the government first thought”. On current evidence it would seem that the majority of people involved were not individuals who have been involved in gangs, although obviously a number of people involved were involved in gangs. “But there is some evidence that obviously there was some gang activity taking place in terms of encouraging people to take part in these events and as we saw, some of that encouragement was being propagated on social media.” Asked if the riots were prompted by the shooting of Mark Duggan by police in Tottenham, north London, on 4 August May said: “I would be very cautious in saying that the shooting had the sort of direct link that we’re talking about.” Some people “chose to go out on the streets and damage buildings and cause disorder,” she said. “What initiated that is something that none of us can wholeheartedly say we know.” She also revealed she believed the number of riot-trained police has to be increased. Currently it is voluntary for police to undertake riot training. It also became clear that the issue of the funding of the cost of the riots has yet to be resolved with the Home Office likely to challenge the costs tabled by various police authorities. May also said she was still looking at the idea of extending curfew powers, but seemed to back off the idea of closing down all social media during riots, arguing it as much a good way for the police to disseminate information. May said an inquiry was underway as to why Duggan’s partner was told by the police to wait outside the Tottenham police station as she sought to find out what had happened to him. She has reportedly claimed she waited outside for four hours. Local police in Tottenham were frustrated that they were not asked to police the demonstration that followed Earlier, shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said that blaming a “feral underclass” was lazy and absolved those involved of responsibility for their actions. He said government cuts were undermining efforts to deal with young criminals – as gang intervention projects were reducing their services or being closed down – which was in turn restricting sentencing options open to judges where community punishments might be more suitable. He said he wanted the courts to have an explicit duty to consider making an order for young criminals to participate in a restorative justice course. Theresa May UK riots Crime London Police Metropolitan police Olympic Games 2012 Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …