Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 88)
Strauss-Kahn case is ‘close to collapse’, say reports

The case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is in doubt following reports of major holes in the credibility of the woman who alleges the former head of the IMF attacked her in May The prosecution case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the leading international diplomat who has suffered a spectacular fall of grace having been accused of sexually assaulting a hotel maid, is close to collapse, according to the New York Times. The newspaper reports that significant problems have emerged with the case against the former head of the International Monetary Fund that could see the conditions of his house arrest in New York being relaxed with immediate effect. Based on interviews with two unnamed law enforcement officers, it says that “major holes” in the case will be admitted to a federal criminal court in Manhattan as early as Friday. At the centre of the dramatic turn in the case, the New York Times reports, is lack of confidence on the prosecution side in the witness’s testimony about what happened to her in Strauss-Kahn’s room at the Sofitel hotel in Manhattan on May 14. She alleged that he sexually assaulted her, and on the back of her account a major case was mounted by the New York district attorney. Lawyers in the defence team for Strauss-Kahn have suggested that they had evidence calling into question the veracity of the housekeeper’s account, but until now the nature of the doubts have not been revealed. The sexual nature of the encounter between the French politician and the maid has never been questioned by either side. But the New York Times report now suggests that police and prosecuting lawyers have concluded that the 32-year-old Guinean immigrant has lied repeatedly about the case. The newspaper says that police tape recorded a telephone conversation between the woman and a man in prison made on the day of the alleged rape in which the woman talked about the possible financial benefits that could come to her as a result of pursuing charges against Strauss-Kahn. The investigation has also found deposits made into her bank account totalling $100,000 over the last two years some of which came from the man, a convicted drug dealer. The startling development in the case is likely to raise numerous questions about what has happened to Strauss-Kahn and his future. He had been due to stand down from the post of managing director of the IMF, one of the most important roles in world finance, and the job has just been filled by the French finance minister, Christine Lagarde. But he was also, until his arrest in New York, a leading contender for the French presidency. His incendiary demise left a gaping hole in domestic French politics. The development will also play to the scepticism of the French public. When the allegations of a rape first surfaced, polls showed that 60% of French voters thought it was a political conspiracy against him. The news comes after weeks of speculation in which some legal experts had said the woman’s case has started to look shakey in recent weeks. Her original lawyer, Jeffrey Shapiro, and renowned civil rights lawyer, Norman Siegel, are no longer working with the woman and have declined to comment about the background to the decisons. Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsweek earlier this month that he believed the woman’s lawyers were working with Strauss-Kahn’s lawyers and looking to broker a deal. Dershowitz said: “Clearly the defendant wants to avoid trial and wants to see if he can work out a deal that’s acceptable to him. And my sense is that the victim would like a big payday. Why does she want to make a deal now? Why not wait until the conviction, and then sue? [Because] the defendant doesn’t have much money. All the money is his wife’s money. And if you win a suit-let’s assume she wins a $10 million judgment against him. She’s not going to collect it. He’ll go bankrupt. Whereas if she settles the case, the wife pays up. So the difference is between getting, say, a million right now from the wife, or $10 million from the husband which the lawyer has to spend the rest of his life chasing.” Making any such deal would threaten charges of obstruction of justice. The woman has no power to stop the criminal case being brought by New York district attorney Cyrus Vance and could be compelled to testify even if she decided no to co-operate, said Stuart Slotnick, a white collar crime expert with New York’s Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney. United States Dominique Strauss-Kahn France Europe IMF New York Ed Pilkington Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
President Obama’s remarks at WH event to observe LGBT Pride Month

Here’s video from the White House LGBT Pride Month reception. I’ve posted the transcript here . Slated to be there today (via emailed pool report): Administration Officials John Berry, Director of the US Office of Personnel Management Nancy Sutley, Chair, CEQ Brad Kiley, Director of the White House Office of Management and Administration Elected Officials Hon. Blake Oshiro, Majority Leader, Hawaii… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Pam’s House Blend Discovery Date : 30/06/2011 02:19 Number of articles : 5

Continue reading …
North Korean defector learns to live outside the world’s biggest prison

Rhee Kyeong-mi used to struggle to find enough food. Now she is finding it hard to adjust to abundance and choice in the South The AK Plaza in Suwon is like any other shopping mall in South Korea: a temple to consumer electronics, fashion and fast food. The Tea and Bakery on the top floor is decorated with a quirky selection of English words: passion, sleepiness, refreshment and comfort. On a recent summer day, a young couple at one table were absorbed in their smartphones, occasionally looking up to exchange smiles. At another table, two Buddhist nuns in grey robes were taking tea and chatting. And at a third, a young woman in a red gingham dress was sitting silently looking into her lap. The woman, Rhee Kyeong-mi, looked as though she ought to fit in perfectly with the buzzing, confident culture around her. The slim, fashionably dressed 21-year-old Korean was seemingly just like dozens of others spending a summer’s day shopping. Only her accent would betray her very different origins. Rhee (a pseudonym to protect her and her family) is a freshly arrived North Korean defector who only three months ago was struggling to survive in a labour camp. This was her first time in a shopping mall and she was somewhat overwhelmed. “It’s just too big, too fantastic,” she said in an awed whisper. Until now, she had spent almost every month of her 21 years focused on finding enough food to stay alive, and the abundance and choice around her were dizzying. Like most of the 23,000 North Koreans who have escaped to the South in the past two decades, Rhee spent three months in Hanawon, a resettlement centre about 20 kilometres from Sowun, where counsellors tried to help her adjust to the transition from one of the poorest, most repressive societies in the world to one of the richest, fastest growing countries in Asia. Hanawon teaches new arrivals how to go to the shops, how to run a bank account and how to understand the English words used increasingly in colloquial and commercial South Korean. But it is an also experiment with broader implications. Teams of psychologists and sociologists are watching to see how people such as Rhee get on because if North Korea collapses the South will have to help 24 million people adapt from a life spent in the world’s biggest prison. Rhee was born in 1990 in Musan in North Hamgyong province, near the border with China. Her father died when she was three, but she is not certain why. North Korea was in the grip of a famine which eventually killed 1-3 million people. People survived by circumventing the state farming system by any means possible. “When my mother was still alive, she went up into the mountains and found a piece of land where we could grow food without being seen,” Rhee said. “My mother and sister did the farming and I would walk three hours to the market and help sell what we had: corn, beans, grain, rabbits and chicken.” In 2005, when Rhee was 15, her mother died. “She hurt her foot farming and it got infected and there was no hospital care. So really she was killed by the lack of hospital services.” Rhee and her sister, Sang-mi, then 18, were left to fend for themselves. They kept their little plot of land going for two years, but could not grow as much food. Rhee was depressed and lonely without their mother and Sang-mi pined for her boyfriend, Choi Myung-chul, who had escaped into China in 2005, telling her he would come back for her in three months. Once on the other side, he found it was too dangerous to return. In 2007, the two sisters and two of Sang-mi’s friends decided to escape themselves, wading across the Yalu river that divides the north-eastern corner of North Korea from Manchuria. The Yalu is fast-flowing, treacherous and well-patrolled, but the four girls knew a spot where it was only waist-deep and deserted. They did not have much of a plan, however. Sang-mi hoped to find Choi, not knowing he had already set off on the long trek across the Gobi desert to Mongolia. China does not allow South Korean embassies on its territories to issue passports to North Korean escapees, no doubt to avoid the human flood that would ensue. An estimated 250,000 have simply settled in southern China. Those with more money and ambition head for South Korean missions in Mongolia and Thailand. The Mongolian route is not to be taken lightly. “It took three days to cross the desert, and sometimes we were up to our middles in snow. We ate snow to stay alive,” recalled Choi, now also in Suwon. Newly arrived in China, the four girls headed to relatives of one of Sang-mi’s friends, but they had no room and directed them to a Chinese man in Yanji city in Jilin province who they said would put them up. He did take them in and feed them, but at a price. His wooden house was divided into two. The man lived with his family on one side, and on the other North Korean girls sat at computers in front of webcams, performing for sex chatlines. “We had to pretend to be South Korean women to talk to South Korean men. We were trained to dress like South Korean women and told what to say. But we did it by typing in text. There was no sound, so the customers wouldn’t know we were from the North,” Rhee said. “We received meals, but no pay, and we couldn’t go outside. It was like a prison. There were four of us there for nearly a year. At one point, one of the girls escaped, but she came back on her own a month later. She knew no one there, and didn’t know the language.” After 11 months of incarceration, Sang-mi and one of the other girls ran away when one of their captor’s friends was left in charge. They persuaded him that they were allowed out for a break. Soon after they disappeared, the police knocked on the door. Whether there was a connection between the two events, Rhee does not know, or she is reluctant to speculate. She and the other remaining girl were deported to North Korea and imprisoned in a labour camp outside the city of Hoeryong. Judging from her description, it may have been North Korean’s infamous Camp 22, the biggest concentration camp in the country. “We were in huge wooden cabins in the mountains. There were about 1,000 women in our cabin and we were so squashed together we had to sleep with our legs interlocking,” she said. “Mostly there were people like me who had tried to escape and ordinary criminals. We had rice husks to eat and had to work cutting down trees and dragging the timber back with chains.” “When it got really cold in winter, five or six women would die every day and the other prisoners would have to carry the bodies out. I still dream about that.” Rhee believes she survived because she was excused the heaviest labour, on account of her youth and a congenital heart condition. Instead, she was allow to knit indoors in the winter. After 18 months in Hoeryong, with only a few days left of her sentence, Rhee had her first visitor — a man she had never met before. Sang-mi had reached South Korea and found Choi. He was able to borrow enough money to hire a Chinese “broker” to look for Rhee. The broker’s first move was to visit Hoeryong and bribe the guards to check if she was still alive. On the day of her release, another man was waiting at the gate to take her across the Tumen river, which marks that segment of the border with China. On the other side, a third broker was waiting to take Rhee on the next stage of her journey: a long boat ride westwards along the Tumen and then a three-day mountain trek into Thailand. Together with the air fare to Seoul, the whole package cost Choi $10,000. He still has $4,000 to pay off, but he has good prospects. He is studying management at the local university. Rhee is still living off her resettlement grant and looking for a job. She has no South Korean friends yet and finds their language, heavily studded with foreign words, hard to understand. But at least she has relatives nearby. Many North Korean escapees have to cope alone. “Everything is different here. It is almost impossible to adjust,” said Cho Myung-chul, a former Communist party ideologue who defected in 1994 and now runs an education centre run by the South Korean unification ministry. The centre is supposed to help prepare people for the eventual collapse of the North Korean regime and its absorption by the South – an event Cho views as inevitable, if not imminent. “These people have been made to idealise Kim Jong-il and the North Korean regime, and when they come here they suffer real psychological pain. They can’t get a job. They miss their family and friends and often feel like they drifting alone here. We give them money and education but we have to do more to rescue them from despair.” With its abundance of food, its freedom, and its strong economy South Korea should feel like a real paradise, but after a lifetime living in the cruel hoax of the “workers’ paradise” north of the demarcation line, the change can be traumatic. East Germans found it hard to adjust to the west but the income differential in Korea is up to 10 times greater. No one knows what will happen if and when 24 million have to make the leap. North Korea South Korea Julian Borger guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Emergency law to overturn court ruling on police bail

Police minister says legislation needed to resolve doubts over 80,000 suspects affected by judgment Emergency legislation is to be introduced to overturn a court ruling that has severely restricted police powers to detain suspects for questioning and plunged police bail laws into chaos. The police minister, Nick Herbert, told MPs the new law was needed because the status of 80,000 suspects currently bailed by police forces across England and Wales had been placed in doubt. Earlier on Thursday the Metropolitan police commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, warned of serious consequences of the court ruling, adding that there were currently 175 murder suspects out on bail in London. Ministers and police chiefs are in urgent talks over interim measures to deal with the situation in the next fortnight or so before the emergency legislation restores the situation. They have concerns about whether they have enough police cells to detain suspects and worry that they may have to drop cases completely. “In some cases it will mean that suspects who would normally be released on bail are detained for longer. It is likely that in most forces, there will not be enough capacity to detain everybody in police cells,” admitted Herbert. “In other cases, it risks impeding the police to such an extent that the investigation will have to be stopped because the detention time has run out. The judgment will also affect the ability of the police to enforce bail conditions.” The ruling by a district judge in Salford, which was upheld by the high court, overturned 25 years of an interpretation of the law under which suspects could be released on police bail and recalled for questioning weeks and even months later as long as the total time in detention was no more than 96 hours. The ruling means that forces are only allowed to hold suspects for up to 96 hours continuously before they have to either charge or release them. Any time spent out on bail must now be counted towards the 96 hours. Herbert, who was answering an urgent Commons question from Labour on the police crisis, told MPs that the home secretary, Theresa May, was in Madrid at a meeting of the G6 interior ministers. He told MPs that police believed the ruling would have a serious impact on their ability to investigate crime and with 80,000 suspects on police bail around the country they could not wait for an appeal to be heard by the supreme court. “That is why the Association of Chief Police Officers [Acpo] has today advised the home secretary that new legislation is needed. We agree with that assessment. So I can tell the house that we will urgently bring forward emergency legislation to overturn the ruling,” he said. “That emergency legislation will clarify the position and provide assurance that the police can continue to operate on the basis on which they have been operating for many years. We are also seeking urgent further advice on how to mitigate the practical problems caused by the court’s decision in this interim period.” It will take at least eight days for parliament to pass the necessary legislation but Herbert said the ruling had to be reversed because it had upset a careful balance which had stood for a quarter of a century, and that it impeded the police’s work. The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, pledged opposition support but demanded to know why it had taken six weeks since the high court upheld the original ruling on 19 May for ministers to act. Herbert claimed the written judgment had not been available to Home Office lawyers until 17 June. When the scale of the problem “became clear” ministers were informed on 24 June: “If any suspect is released on bail, the judgment means they are, in effect, still in police detention. This means that time spent on bail should count towards any maximum period of precharge detention. It causes us great concern.” Police Liberal-Conservative coalition Alan Travis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
WaPo’s Obama Presser Adjectives: ‘Tougher,’ ‘Combative,’ ‘Commanding,’ and ‘Rather Feisty’

The Washington Post's adjectives in Thursday's coverage of the Obama press conference signaled their approval. “Obama takes tougher tone on economy, foreign policy” was the headline at the top of Page One. Post reporters Peter Wallsten and Zachary Goldfarb led off with how Obama “belittled” congressional Republicans for taking vacations during debt-limit talks and contrasted their work effort with his young daughters. But his mission was to “reassert a commanding presence” on the issues. He was not “petulant” or “whiny,” he was “showing a combative side that Americans rarely see.” The front-page promo underneath hailed Dana Milbank's “Washington Sketch” full of praise. “The pugilist in chief: A press corps gathered to hear our regularly scheduled president meets a rather feisty gentleman instead.” Online, the headline was “Obama uses combative new tone to retake reins on economic, foreign policy issues”. Inside, on A4, the headline was “Obama asserts himself on top issues.” Wallsten and Goldfarb cooed: Throughout the news conference, he spoke with more vigor and specificity than he has at any point before about the potential dangers Americans face if Republicans don't agree by a

Continue reading …
Cornell Fraternity Sued for Allegedly Hazing a Student to Death

The Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity at Cornell University is being sued for $25 million by the mother of a student who was allegedly forced to drink so much alcohol that he died. According to the lawsuit, the student, George Desdunes, a 19-year-old sophomore and SAE member, was kidnapped by student pledging his house, tied up

Continue reading …
Tom Petty: Michele Bachmann Can’t Use My Song

If Michele Bachmann becomes the next President of the United States, it’s safe to say that Tom Petty won’t be playing the inauguration. When the newly minted Republican presidential candidate left the stage in Waterloo, Iowa, after making a nationally televised speech to announce her candidacy, Petty’s track “American Girl” could be heard playing her

Continue reading …
Barack Obama tells Republicans to take on sacred cows over borrowing talks

President warns of ‘significant consequences’ if Congress fails to permit more borrowing and US defaults on debts Barack Obama has warned of “significant consequences” for the US economy if stalled financial negotiations lead to Congress failing to permit more government borrowing and America defaults on its debts. The president, in a rare hour-long news conference, called on Republicans to “take on their sacred cows” – including tax breaks for “millionaires and billionaires, oil companies and corporate jet owners” – in reaching a deal on Congress legislating an increase in government borrowing from the present $14.3tn (£8.9tn) limit, without which the US may be unable to meet its obligations within weeks. Negotiations have been deadlocked over the insistence of the Democratic leadership that budget cuts must be accompanied by tax increases in order to reduce the debt. Republican congressional leaders say that the party did not win control of the House of Representatives in last November’s midterm elections on a platform of scaling back government only to increase taxes. Obama has said that if agreement is not reached by early August, then the US risks default – a blow to international confidence in the American economy – and seeing its credit rating downgraded, which would make borrowing more expensive. “August 2 is a very important date, and there is no reason why we can’t get this done now,” he said. “This is not a technical problem anymore. This is a matter of Congress going ahead and biting the bullet and making tough decisions because we know what the decisions are.” Obama said more than $1tn in cuts have already been agreed but that other areas of the budget, including defence spending – considered untouchable by some Republicans – must be scrutinised. He said that retaining tax breaks for the wealthy will be at the expense of programmes for the less privileged. “We’ve got to make some tough choices here,” he said. The president called on Republicans to put aside soundbite politics and act in the interests of the country. “A lot of people say a lot of things to satisfy their base or to get on cable news,” he said. “Hopefully, leaders at a certain point rise to the occasion and do the right thing for the American people. That is what I expect to happen this time. Call me naive, but my expectation is leaders are going to lead.” The president criticised the Republicans’ tactic of stepping back from negotiations when things don’t go their way and then blaming him for lack of leadership, saying it “is just not on the level”. Obama defended himself against charges that he has failed to show leadership. “I’ve already shown I’m prepared to make decisions that are very tough and will give my base of voters further reason to give me a hard time,” he said. The president also criticised a largely symbolic vote in Congress against US involvement in Libya. “We have engaged in a limited operation to help a lot of people against one of the worst tyrants in the world,” he said. “We should be sending out a unified message to this guy that he should step down and give his people a fair chance to live their lives without fear. And this suddenly becomes the cause celebre for folks in Congress? Come on.” Obama repeated his defence of military action in Libya without congressional approval, saying once again that he does not believe the limited American involvement reaches the scale of conflict defined by the War Powers Resolution. Asked if that law is constitutional, he sidestepped the issue by saying that it was not relevant to the Libya intervention. “I don’t have to get to the question,” he said. The president also sidestepped a question about whether he supports the legalisation of same-sex marriage, after the New York state legislature voted to do so last week. Obama said the New York decision is a “good thing” because it was the result of the democratic process. “What I’ve seen happen over the last several years and what happened in New York last week, I think, was a good thing,” he said. “I think that’s how things should work.” But he declined to endorse same-sex marriages when asked if he “personally” is in favour of legalising them. “I’m not going to make news on that today. Good try though,” he said. US politics US Government borrowing Barack Obama US economy Republicans Economics United States Chris McGreal guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Fox talkers dream up Latino votes for GOP by focusing on Obama immigration failures — but omit where Republicans really stand

Click here to view this media This discussion on Fox News.com Live the other day caught my attention, mainly because it featured a hopeful discussion by a Latino conservative, the Heritage Foundation’s Israel Ortega , who was insisting that Republicans stand a lot to gain in the coming election cycle if they bash President Obama for his manifest failures at passing not just meaningful immigration reform, but even a simple measure like the DREAM Act. Now, it’s certainly true that Obama has abjectly failed on that front. Latinos know it better than anyone. And there’s little doubt that pointing that out repeatedly to Latinos will help depress Latino turnout for his re-election. On the other hand, it’s hard to see — as Ellis Henican gently tried to point out to Ortega — how Republicans can stand to gain from pointing it out too loudly or too often: After all, it doesn’t take much to remind Latinos just why Obama couldn’t pass anything: Across-the-board Republican lockstep obstructionism, accompanied by a loud chorus of vicious right-wing Latino-bashing. I think the Anonymous Radicalized Marginal House Democrat (who is an actual House Democrat) put it about perfectly in his discussion awhile back with the Paranoid Self-Loathing GOP Lobbyist (who is an actual GOP lobbyist) on this very topic: PSLGOPL asked why “a filibuster proof Senate, bullet proof liberal Majority in the House and a President dedicated to Change” hasn’t done anything about “Comprehensive Immigration Reform, or better yet, just the DREAM Act.” ARMHD responded: “Easy: because desperate Republicans two years ago had to swap dog whistles for bull horns to reach their virulent nativist base voters, and now nativism has become a litmus test for Republicans. “Anti-immigrant groups were building blocks of the Tea Party. Tea Party Republicans foam at the mouth when they have to press one for English.They want to arrest and deport anyone buying Tecate beer with cash at WalMart. It’s the culture, stupid. “Republicans’ open bigotry toward Latinos will be more and more of an electoral problem for them, of course, but when their party was in shambles two years ago they weren’t thinking about the long run, they had to fire up their base right away, including their crazies…especially their crazies. So the people that Karl Rove tried to keep hidden because he was afraid they would completely creep out soccer moms are front and center. “The Tea Party has made cowards of Republican politicians who used to hold themselves out as courageous statesmen, or more likely, revealed them to be cowards. The sainted John McCain, who worked with Ted Kennedy on a ‘grand bargain’ on immigration, beat J.D. Hayworth by making a hard right turn. Remember the ‘danged fence’ ad? “Lindsey Graham will be practicing law with Bob Inglis unless he can get way right by 2014. Orrin Hatch and Dick Lugar are in deep trouble. Chuck Grassley is trying to explain that when he called for an ‘individual mandate’ for health care, he meant an individual mandate to prove citizenship in the emergency room. “What a bunch of wusses. “With every Republican opposing reform, whether from conviction or from cowardice, it only took one skittish Democrat to kill anything even in that brief window when Democrats had the 60 votes needed to defeat a filibuster, and Republicans filibustered everything. “The good news for Democrats is that the electorate will be browner and browner, Latinos see the anti-immigration rhetoric as thinly veiled appeals to bigotry against them, and Asians and other minority groups are watching it all and wondering whether Republicans really like them any better. So enjoy anti-immigration politics now, PSLGOP, anchor babies will be voting soon, and so will their friends.” Republicans may want to wish away all the ugly rhetoric and right-wing lawmaking directed at Latinos (see the new Alabama laws for the most recent example). Lots of moderate Republicans have tried to point this out too. But they know, too, that bigotry pays dividends — in the short run. That’s what they do it.

Continue reading …
There will be no public sympathy for strikes, says Vince Cable

Business secretary says he is optimistic public sector pension talks will succeed as 750,000 prepare to stage Thursday walkouts The business secretary, Vince Cable, has warned teachers, jobcentre workers and immigration officials who are preparing to take strike action on Thursday that there will be no public sympathy for walkouts. Cable – who warned recently that tougher strike laws could follow walkouts – said: “I don’t think the public will understand. “The public view would be that we are negotiating and are willing to negotiate, so why would people be out on strike until that process has run its course?” Up to 750,000 employees affiliated to the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, the National Union of Teachers, the University and College Union and the Public and Commercial Services Union are expected to stage Thursday walkouts over pension reforms. Cable said he was “optimistic” that pensions reform talks would succeed, saying: “Most trade unions are committed to negotiations. They asked for the talks and we are taking them seriously.” He added that a “relatively” small number unions would strike on Thursday, without the backing of resounding ballot turnouts. “They don’t have a very strong mandate,” he said. David Cameron confirmed during prime minister’s questions that MPs would be subject to the pension reforms and will have to increase the amount they pay every month along with most other public sector workers. At the moment, to qualify for the most generous accrual rates MPs pay 11.7% of their salaries. They are likely to have to increase this by five percentage points – the maximum increase the Treasury has indicated. On average, contributions will go up by 3.2 percentage points from next April, but those earning under £15,000 will be exempted and those earning less than £18,500 will be capped at a 1.5 percentage point increase. Higher earners, including MPs, will have to pay up to five percentage points more to offset the cost of protecting low earners. Cameron said: “In this house we are public sector workers as well, and we should be subject to exactly the same changes that we’re asking others to take on. “The increase in contributions should apply to the MPs system, even though it’s a system where we already pay in quite a lot. We’re saying [that] right across the board the increase in pension contributions is right to create a healthier long-term system.” And he added: “I don’t believe there is any case for industrial action tomorrow, not least because talks are still ongoing. It is only a minority of unions who have taken the decision to go ahead and strike. “What I want to see tomorrow is as many mums and dads as possible able to take their children to school. What I would say is this: what we are proposing is fair, it is fair to taxpayers but it is also fair to the public sector because we want to continue strong public sector pensions.” He also accused Labour of avoiding bringing up the issue of the strikes during because of the party’s financial relationship with the unions. “Twenty-six minutes into questions and not a squeak from the party opposition about strikes or pensions or the need for reform,” he said. “Because they are paid for by the unions, they can’t discuss the unions.” Vince Cable Trade unions David Cameron Liberal-Conservative coalition Public sector pensions Public services policy Public sector pay Schools Dan Milmo Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …