The heads of his fellow 2012 GOP Clown Car occupants are probably spinning as Mitt Romney again cannot decide whether the President has destroyed the economy. Today he’s at it again. As Think Progress noted, in a tweet , ” 4 days after saying Obama didn’t make the recession worse, Romney says Obama made the recession worse .” Watch it: Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Pam’s House Blend Discovery Date : 05/07/2011 00:00 Number of articles : 2
Continue reading …This is a story about redistricting, local politics, and a lazy local newspaper. By now you have probably seen the ads here and elsewhere about what an incredibly dangerous man Elton Gallegly is, particularly since he is the chairman of the House Immigration Committee. An entrenched Republican, Gallegly courts the local Tea Party while stoking anti-immigrant hate wherever he goes. You may also have heard that Gallegly is in danger of being redistricted out of office . California’s redistricting plans are being drawn by citizens. It is bipartisan and the commission has drafted a plan that ends the incessant gerrymandering that allows people like Elton Gallegly to be elected over and over again. But. There’s always a but. This area is a weird blend of hardcore racist types and a younger, more hip demographic. The redistricting plans are actually quite sensible, splitting Simi Valley away from the coastal cities and including them in a district that extends into Los Angeles County. Yes, that Simi Valley, the conservative bedroom community where people who work in the Valley live so they don’t have to live in the Valley. Turns out, Simi Valley folks don’t care for this plan . Not only don’t they like it, they made their feelings known loudly, clearly, and obnoxiously about a week ago. David Atkins wrote this for Calitics : Finally, as to the character of the local Republicans and conservatives, it was clear once again that the GOP has a massive demographic problem. The vast majority of those who gave conservative testimony at the commission were white and over the age of 65, while those on the left-hand side skewed somewhat younger and considerably browner. The refrains included a panoply of coded racial resentments (“culture”, “lifestyle” “our interests” and “our heritage” being among them) expressing outrage, as the Ventura County Star’s Timm Herdt aptly notes, at being associated with Los Angeles, Oxnard or other dreaded areas where (gasp!) brown people might congregate: David Atkins is one of the finest progressive activists we have in this county. He makes it his business to actually get out and do something instead of talking about it. And he attended that meeting. Not only did he attend that meeting, he sent out some live tweets about it in real time. As you might imagine, he wasn’t shy about calling out the old white Republican demographic for what they were: bigoted , selfish racists . Of course, this is nothing new when it comes to racists “> the abuse this commission has been taking from the tea party and its minions. It’s not new, this “not in my backyard” attitude. In 2005 and again in 2008 I stood against an effort to break off the local high school from the Oxnard Union High School District, which was initiated by east county residents in Camarillo who didn’t want their kids going to school with the kids whose parents pick the strawberries they had for breakfast that morning. Fortunately, both efforts failed, but I’m certain they’ll be revived again. David Atkins spoke the truth about Republicans in this area. And now he’s being hounded and harassed, Breitbart-style. You know that style. It’s the one where they attack you and amplify it, hoping that at some point you’ll just get so sick of the hounding you’ll give up. David isn’t giving up , despite the best efforts of Ventura County Star’s Republican thug blogger’s efforts to make him. Of course, this follows the Star putting a story on their front page about the local Democrats distancing themselves from Atkins’ remarks. Because in this county, we cannot actually call these xenophobic folks on Social Security and Medicare who always vote for do-nothing thug Republicans the bigots that they are. Atkins: But on a larger note, this incident has become about taking a stand. Not just taking a stand against racism, but taking a stand against trollery and Breitbartism . The usual rabid wingnut commenters at the Star have made intimations about calling my company’s client list and otherwise harrassing me in my personal life, and are trying to force me out of the Democratic Central Committee to make an example of me and stop me from doing my work here. Ingemunson and his friends and allies have a gameplan–one that they have seen work in the past with ACORN, Van Jones, and Shirley Sherrod: gin up faux outrage, try to get a scalp, and assume that Democrats and the left will panic and “make the problem go away” rather than stand up to the bullies and fight for what’s right. In this case, we’re not going to give them the satisfaction. We’re going to continue to defend the rights of those who are not traditionally paid attention to in our County, to have their voices heard without fear of intimidation or discrimination. And, outside of the misguided few Lieberman-loving centrists and Proposition 8 supporters who have opposed and tried to poison the well locally against my and my allies’ reform efforts from the beginning, most of us are ready to stand and fight for what we know is right. All politics is local. And this one’s in my back yard, and the thugs are attacking someone who is working hard to make this county (and country) better. So yeah, David. You bet we’ll get your back. No worries.
Continue reading …The former prime minister once blamed Prince Charles for ‘screwing’ his government, Alastair Campbell’s diaries claim Tony Blair has launched a staunch defence of the Prince of Wales after the former prime minister was quoted as saying the heir to the throne was guilty of “screwing” his government. In a letter to the Guardian, Blair confirms that he voiced critical remarks of the prince in private after his former communications chief Alastair Campbell chronicled their differences in his diaries. But Blair, who was quoted as describing the prince’s decision to boycott a banquet in honour of the former Chinese president in 1999 as “silly”, said he found their discussions “immensely helpful”. He writes: “A prime minister may sound off from time to time, especially when sensitive discussions with members of the royal family leak into the papers, in the middle of some high-profile issue. “However, I want to make it clear that I always found my discussions and correspondence with Prince Charles immensely helpful. I thought he had a perfect right to raise questions and did so in a way that was both informative and insightful. So I welcomed his contributions, and have no doubt he will continue to raise issues with the new government as he is entitled and indeed it is his job to do, and that they will also find it helpful.” The Guardian published extracts from Campbell’s diaries over the weekend. These revealed that Blair believed the prince publicly interfered in government policy in a manner that occasionally stepped over constitutional boundaries. Campbell wrote that Blair became particularly frustrated when the prince made “deeply unhelpful” interventions during the foot-and-mouth crisis in 2001. Campbell wrote on 16 March 2001: “TB … said he knew exactly what he was doing. He also asked whether Charles had ever considered help when 6,000 jobs were lost at Corus [the steel manufacturer]. He said this was all about screwing us and trying to get up the message that we weren’t generous enough to the farmers.” Tony Blair Prince Charles Alastair Campbell Nicholas Watt guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Military sources ‘baffled’ about events surrounding disappearance of soldier, despite Taliban capture claims The British soldier who went missing on Monday was stationed at a new base in the Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand province, which recently came under sustained attack by insurgents. He had been on sentry duty at Checkpoint Salaang on Sunday night and early Monday, and had just finished his shift. It would most likely have been quiet at that time, but still warm: in Helmand at this time of year, the temperature rarely falls below 25C. His colleagues from 4th Battalion the Royal Regiment of Scotland, and those from the Afghan army who are also at the heavily fortified compound had expected him to return to quarters. Instead he appears to have left the base on his own. Within hours stories were circulating about what happened to him next. The Taliban claimed he had been captured by insurgents and killed in a skirmish as Nato forces tried to rescue him. Another report said he had been seen walking to the nearby Nahr-e Bughra canal, perhaps to go for a swim. Without having complete clarity themselves, military officials in London were as certain as they could be that these stories were untrue. But his disappearance was considered serious enough for David Cameron to cancel a trip to the British base at Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand, and for the full might of Nato forces – surveillance planes, helicopters and hundreds of extra troops – to flood into the area to seek him. Sources in London said they were baffled by what had happened and were still trying to establish what had encouraged the soldier to leave his post without telling colleagues. Just days ago, a patrol of Royal Marines from 45 Commando came under attack from insurgents hiding just 300 metres from the base, so security would have been at its highest level. “He had been on ‘Stag’ [sentry duty] at a small vehicle checkpoint and had just finished his shift,” said one source. “And then, for whatever reason, he walked off. Instead of going back into the base where the other soldiers were, he headed out of the base – and that was the last that was seen of him. “We are trying to work out exactly what has happened. There was no battle or fight or anything like that as far as we know.” The Ministry of Defence was told that the soldier was seen heading down the road away from the checkpoint by Afghan soldiers, who then reported him missing. As the search got under way, the International Security and Assistance Force (Isaf) issued a brief notice stating that a soldier had “been listed as duty status whereabouts unknown in southern Afghanistan. There is an active search effort in progress.” Reporters travelling with the prime minister were told too, as the entourage was diverted – at Cameron’s request – away from Helmand to the capital, Kabul. The Taliban were quick to claim responsibility for the soldier’s disappearance. Speaking to the Guardian, Qari Yousuf Ahmadi, a Taliban spokesman, gave one detailed account. “Yesterday afternoon … our mujahideen ambushed some soldiers and captured a British soldier. At 8pm, the foreign forces operation began to rescue him and continued until 3am. “During that operation, the British soldier was killed, along with four to six other foreigners. Now the foreigners are saying that he was alone. But he was not alone. “They are not brave enough to come even two steps out of their base alone. His body was left in the battlefield. I don’t know where it is now.” Ahmadi said he did not know how the soldier was killed. The MoD said this account was not true. “There are always claims of responsibility for incidents,” said one Whitehall official. “But we can only work with what we know. And all we know is that he has gone. “At the moment, we cannot even be absolutely sure he is in the hands of the Taliban. There are criminal gangs operating in this area too. A huge search operation is under way. That has to be our focus right now.” The reports from Afghanistan also prompted the defence secretary, Liam Fox, to address MPs. “I recognise there will be many questions, but speculation on an issue of this nature is unhelpful. I would urge restraint from colleagues and the media and assure the house the United Kingdom and Isaf are taking all necessary and appropriate action.” Two hours after that statement, officials confirmed that the soldier’s body had been found and he had become the 375th British serviceman to die on duty in Afghanistan. If the insurgents have claimed another victim, it will serve as a chilling reminder that the fighting in Afghanistan is far from over and the Taliban – despite the pounding they took over the winter months – are still capable and resilient. Isaf commanders repeatedly warned that insurgents would seek publicity over the summer months with high-profile international targets, and so far they have been proved right. Last week suicide bombers attacked the Intercontinental hotel in Kabul and before that targeted a hospital in Logar. Two months ago the Taliban orchestrated an audacious escape from Kandahar prison. Monday’s incident comes during a particularly difficult time for UK forces in Afghanistan. Eight British soldiers have died on duty in the past five weeks as the Taliban seeks to reassert itself in areas where it had apparently lost control. Commanders have also been at odds with their political masters over whether British and American forces are being pulled out of the country too soon. This latest episode could not have been timed better from the insurgents’ point of view. In just over a fortnight the “transition” process – Nato forces handing over control of parts of the country to the Afghan army and police – is due to begin. The safest districts are to be in the first tranche of transition, and those currently under British control are included in this first wave. The improvement in security at Lashkar Gah is often cited as a British success story and the district is scheduled to be transferred to the Afghan authorities on 21 July. Adopting the counterinsurgency doctrine that has become synonymous with US general David Petraeus, British commanders have taken a high-profile role in the city, spending time with locals and working with Afghan police and army officers to keep the peace. But even here there has been trouble. In May the Taliban attacked a number of Afghan checkpoints – one rocket exploded near a police station and killed the daughter of a police commander. The compound of the governor, Gulab Mangal, was also hit. The military would argue that the security situation is better, and there is some evidence to back the claim. In May 2010 British troops in Helmand had “contact” with insurgents 160 times in four weeks (15 in the first week of May, 30 in the second, 50 in the third and 65 in the fourth). In May 2011 the total was 96 “contacts” (11, 10, 45, 30). If the established pattern continues, the figures for June are likely to be higher. But military officials know that impressions count and if insurgents appear able to target British troops, local people will question whether they are ready to put their security in the hands of the less experienced Afghans. The total number of security incidents across the country may not reassure Afghans either, with the number of incidents barely changing year on year, despite the best efforts of the American “surge”. Commanders argued that this lack of improvement was predictable as the Taliban attempted to regain lost influence and territory. They have also insisted the surge should only be judged after two full years. But this is a luxury they no longer have. Barack Obama has ordered all 30,000 extra US soldiers sent to Afghanistan last year back home by autumn 2012. Cameron, meanwhile, is expected to announce that the British will withdraw another 500 troops next year, in addition to the 450 leaving this year. Nato countries now have a blueprint to get out of the country and an end goal – by December 2014 they will be in Afghanistan for training and overseeing purposes only, not for fighting. The entire process is predicated on the belief that Afghanistan will be comparatively stable by then, with their security forces able to take over. But those are two very big assumptions in a country where Nato has learned not to assume anything. Additional reporting by Saeed Shah in Islamabad Military Afghanistan Nick Hopkins Saeed Shah guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sir George Young announces reaction to controversial legal ruling that time spent on police bail counted towards the 96-hour limit of pre-charge detention Emergency legislation to reverse a controversial legal ruling on police bail will go through all stages in the Commons on Thursday. The leader of the House, Sir George Young, said peers would then consider the police detention and bail bill early next week. The move to rush through new laws comes after ministers told MPs that waiting for the results of an appeal to the supreme court would take too long. The initial ruling, made by a district judge and backed by a judicial review at the high court, means officers can no longer bail suspects for more than four days without either charging or releasing them. Young’s announcement came as three supreme court justices were considering an application from Greater Manchester police (GMP) to stay the judgment pending a full appeal at the same court on 25 July. The row started when district judge Jonathan Finestein, sitting at Salford magistrates court, refused a routine application from GMP for a warrant of further detention of murder suspect Paul Hookway on 5 April. High court judge Mr Justice McCombe confirmed the ruling in a judicial review on 19 May, which meant time spent on police bail counted towards the maximum 96-hour limit of pre-charge detention. For the past 25 years, police and the courts have only counted the time spent being questioned or in police custody towards the limit, with many suspects being released on bail for months before being called back for further interviews. The shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, claimed it had led to police failing to arrest domestic violence suspects who breached bail conditions, leaving alleged victims vulnerable. The Home Office has been criticised for not acting sooner to reverse the ruling but the home secretary, Theresa May, told police chiefs: “There is a clear need to act fast to make sure we put things right for the police.” Policing minister Nick Herbert announced that emergency legislation would be used an hour after receiving legal advice from the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), she said. “There is no question that I will always give the police the tools and powers they need to catch criminals, investigate crimes and protect the public,” May said. Herbert admitted last week that officials were told of the oral judgment in May, but its full impact only became clear when the written judgment was handed down on 17 June and ministers were alerted on 24 June. Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire police, highlighted the problems the ruling caused his officers last week, saying they were left “running round like headless chickens … wondering what this means to the nature of justice”. About 85,200 people are on bail in England and Wales at any one time and the common practice in most major inquiries of releasing suspects on bail and calling them back for questioning weeks later was “pretty much a dead duck” after the ruling, police chiefs said. UK criminal justice George Young Police Crime Theresa May UK supreme court Yvette Cooper guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …• Deleted voicemails gave family false hope • Hacking interfered with police hunt • Family lawyer: actions ‘heinous and despicable’ The News of the World illegally targeted the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler and her family in March 2002, interfering with police inquiries into her disappearance, an investigation by the Guardian has established. Scotland Yard are investigating the episode, which is likely to put new pressure on the then editor of the paper, Rebekah Brooks, now Rupert Murdoch’s chief executive in the UK; and the then deputy editor, Andy Coulson, who resigned in January as the prime minister’s media adviser. Milly’s family lawyer this afternoon issued a statement in which he described the News of the World’s activities as “heinous” and “despicable”. Milly Dowler, then aged 13, disappeared on her way home in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey on 21 March 2002. Detectives from Scotland Yard’s new inquiry into the phone hacking, Operation Weeting, are believed to have found evidence of the targeting of the Dowlers in a collection of 11,000 pages of notes kept by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator jailed for phone hacking on behalf of the News of the World. During the last four weeks the Met officers have approached Surrey police and taken formal statements from some of those involved in the original inquiry, who were concerned about how News of the World journalists intercepted – and deleted – the voicemail messages of Milly Dowler. The messages were deleted by journalists in the first few days after Milly’s disappearance so as to free up space for more messages. As a result friends and relatives of Milly concluded wrongly that she might still be alive. Police feared evidence may have been destroyed. The Guardian investigation has shown that, within a very short time of Milly vanishing News of the World journalists reacted by engaging in what was then standard practice in their newsroom – they hired private investigators to get them a story. Their first step was simple, albeit illegal. Paperwork seen by the Guardian reveals that they paid a Hampshire private investigator, Steve Whittamore, to obtain home addresses and, where necessary, ex-directory phone numbers for any families called Dowler in the Walton area. The three addresses which Whittamore found could be obtained lawfully, using the electoral register. The two ex-directory numbers, however, were “blagged” illegally from British Telecom’s confidential records by one of Whittamore’s associates, John Gunning, who works from a base in Wiltshire. One of the ex-directory numbers was attributed by Whittamore to Milly’s family home. Then, with the help of their own full-time private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, the News of the World started illegally intercepting mobile phone messages. Scotland Yard are now investigating evidence that they hacked direct into the voicemail of the missing girl’s own phone. As her friends and parents called and left messages imploring Milly to get in touch with them, the News of the World were listening and recording their every private word. But the journalists at the News of the World then encountered a problem. Milly’s voicemail box filled up and would accept no more messages. Apparently thirsty for more information from more voicemails, the News of the World intervened – and deleted the messages which had been left in the first few days after her disappearance. According to one source, this had a devastating effect: when her friends and family called again and discovered that her voicemail had been cleared, they concluded that this must have been done by Milly herself and, therefore, that she must still be alive. But she was not. The interference created false hope and extra agony for those who were misled by it. The Dowler family then granted an exclusive interview to the News of the World in which they talked about their hope, quite unaware that it had been falsely kindled by the newspaper’s own intervention. Sally Dowler told them: “If Milly walked through the door, I don’t think we’d be able to speak. We’d just weep tears of joy and give her a great big hug.” The deletion of the messages also caused difficulties for the police. It confused the picture at a time when they had few real leads to pursue. It also potentially destroyed valuable evidence. According to one senior source familiar with the Surrey police investigation: “It can happen with abduction murders that the perpetrator will leave messages, asking the missing person to get in touch, as part of their efforts at concealment. We need those messages as evidence. Anybody who destroys that evidence is seriously interfering with the course of a police investigation.” The newspaper made little effort to conceal the hacking from its readers. On 14 April 2002, they published a story about a woman who was allegedly pretending to be Milly Dowler and who had applied for a job with a recruitment agency: “It is thought the hoaxer even gave the agency Milly’s real mobile phone number … The agency used the number to contact Milly when a job vacancy arose and left a message on her voicemail … It was on March 27, six days after Milly went missing, that the employment agency appears to have phoned her mobile.” The newspaper also made no effort to conceal their activity from Surrey police. After they had hacked the message from the recruitment agency on Milly’s phone, they informed police about it. It was Surrey detectives who established that the call was not intended for Milly Dowler. At the time Surrey police suspected that phones belonging to detectives and to Milly’s parents also were being targeted. One of those who was involved in the original inquiry said: “We’d arrange landline calls. We didn’t trust our mobiles.” However, they took no action against the News of the World, partly because their main focus was to find the missing schoolgirl and partly because this was only one example of tabloid misbehaviour. As one source close to the inquiry put it: “There was a hell of a lot of dirty stuff going on.” In a statement today, the family’s lawyer, Mark Lewis of Taylor Hampton, said the Dowlers were distressed at the revelation: “It is distress heaped upon tragedy to learn that the News of the World had no humanity at such a terrible time. The fact that they were prepared to act in such a heinous way that could have jeopardised the police investigation and give them false hope is despicable.” During the last four weeks, officers from Scotland Yard’s new inquiry into the phone-hacking, Operation Weeting, have approached Surrey police and taken formal statements from some of those who were involved in the original inquiry. Two earlier Yard inquiries had failed to investigate the relevant notes in Mulcaire’s logs. The News of the World’s investigation was part of a long-running campaign against paedophiles championed by the then editor, Rebekah Brooks. Labour MP Tom Watson last week told the House of Commons that four months after Milly Dowler’s disappearance, the News of the World had targeted one of the parents of the two 10-year-old Soham girls, Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells, who were abducted and murdered on 4 August 2002. The behaviour of tabloid newspapers became an issue in the trial of Levi Bellfield, who last month was jailed for the rest of his life for murdering Milly Dowler. A second charge, that he had attempted to abduct another Surrey schoolgirl, Rachel Cowles, had to be left on the file after premature publicity by tabloids were held to have made it impossible for the jury to reach a fair verdict. The tabloids, however, focused their anger on Bellfield’s defence lawyer, complaining that the questioning had caused unnecessary pain to Milly Dowler’s parents. Surrey police referred all questions on the subject to Scotland Yard, who said they could not discuss it. Milly Dowler Phone hacking News of the World Newspapers & magazines National newspapers Newspapers Crime Rebekah Brooks Privacy & the media Privacy Andy Coulson News Corporation News International Nick Davies Amelia Hill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, says reforms ‘run risk of compromising safety of citizens for reasons of expediency’ One of Britain’s top police officers has warned that the government’s police reform programme, combined with spending cuts, risks compromising public safety. Sir Hugh Orde, the president of the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), warned that if the introduction of elected police commissioners, the creation of a national crime agency and other changes were mismanaged they risked undermining the historic British tradition of policing. Orde told the Acpo summer conference meeting in Harrogate, North Yorkshire on Monday that the “service of last resort” faced a period of “changes to accountability, changes to central structures and changes to pay and conditions, which, if mismanaged, could threaten the impartial model of policing that has existed for 180 years and is revered around the world”. He said: “We understand the government’s determination to deliver a substantial programme of reforms across the public sector, but we cannot afford to get policing wrong and, unless greater clarity emerges in the very near future, I fear we run the risk of compromising the safety of citizens for reasons of expediency.” He said the public sector was facing its most challenging times in living memory: “In short, we have a change programme that, at one end, will produce some of the most radical changes to police governance since 1829 and, at the other, will without question reduce police and staff numbers and pay.” Orde earlier told the BBC that concerns centred on the “loose ends where we lack clarity”. He explained that at the same time that police pay reforms were being negotiated, the national police improvement agency, which delivers all the IT and police training, was being dismantled and a national crime agency was being proposed but not even draft legislation had yet been produced. “So bring that all together and add a new accountability structure currently making its way through the House of Lords and what you see is a very confused policing landscape that needs to be cleared up before we can move on.” The home secretary, Theresa May, is due to address the Acpo conference later and is expected to defend the government’s police reform programme and drive to find savings in the police service. The £11bn annual Whitehall grant to police forces is due to be cut by 20% by 2014-15. However, Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, said May would be deeply unwise not to heed such a serious warning from one of Britain’s top police officers. She said: “David Cameron and Theresa May are taking big risks on law and order. Hugh Orde is right to point out that the home secretary is reducing police numbers and police powers but increasing the risk of politicisation. “This endangers the centuries-old tradition of impartiality as well as the effectiveness of the police and it is communities that will pay the price.” Police Public services policy Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The Puerto Rican singer talks about his struggle with his sexuality, his happiness at having finally come out and the ‘very erotic’ show he is bringing to London Ricky Martin would like to make one thing completely clear. The show he is bringing to London this month is “erotic”, he says, leaning towards me. “Very erotic,” he lowers his voice meaningfully. There’ll be fetish play, whips, chains, nudity (on film), he tells me, and an onstage orgy involving him and his eight dancers. He predicts the 18,000-strong audience will want to join in. And it’s this that worries me. When I go to his Madrid show the next day, the temperature outside is 33C. Inside, in a stadium heaving with heavily perfumed women and heavily muscled men, the temperature is anyone’s guess. When the fiftysomething woman beside me stands up, howling, at Martin’s first appearance, a slug of her sweat hits me, and I suck my teeth nervously. It’s a bacterial breeding ground, I think. When this orgy gets under way, veruccas will be spreading like wildfire. But I needn’t worry. The show is less erotic, more exuberant. Martin bounds around the stage like a huge, horny chipmunk, thrusting, hopping and swaying through the daffy charms of Shake Your Bon-Bon and She Bangs . There is a sweetness about him, a yearning for approval, that recalls his boyband childhood, and his enormous success in the late 1990s; when he sings the lyric “I wanna be your lover” and mimes holding a massive phallus, eyes astonished, then beseeching, it calls to mind nothing so much as a child proffering a large frog. The crowd screams when he opens his shirt, they punch the air to his 1998 football anthem La Copa de la Vida , and lose it when he sings his recent Spanish language release Más . As the gig ends, Martin gazes out at the audience, sweaty with joy. These are ecstatic times for him. Last year, after more than a decade of rumours and sniping about his sexuality, Martin announced online that he was “a fortunate homosexual man” ; he followed this statement with his autobiography, Me, in which he described his sheer pride and relief at coming out. For this, his first UK newspaper interview since the announcement, we meet in a hotel suite in Madrid, and he is warm and open, all hugs, as are his entourage of family and lifelong friends. When I ask whether he still feels as euphoric as he did while writing the book, he sprawls on the couch, and starts running his hands wildly over his chest. He is the most physically expansive person I’ve ever interviewed. “I feel liberated ,” he laughs. “I feel in touch with myself.” Then he sits up, suddenly serious. “I feel protected. I don’t feel alone. Because sometimes when you’re quiet about yourself, you feel all alone. And all of a sudden you come out and you have this amazing community, the LGBT community, and LGBT-friendly people, who are giving you nothing but love. And if I focus on this, I get tears in my eyes, because, oh my God, I wish everyone that was struggling right now could feel what I’m feeling as I’m talking to you. It’s just love coming from every fucking direction!” This is particularly poignant for Martin because of the years spent dodging questions and insinuations. The most notable incident was when Barbara Walters, the veteran US journalist, interviewed him for an Oscars special in 2000, and badgered him to address the rumours . (She has since said those questions were “inappropriate”, the one regret in her three decades of Oscar interviews.) He replied that “sexuality and homosexuality should not be a problem for anybody” and refused to say much more; back then, he was terrified of what would happen if he came out, the possible rejection. “I hated it when people tried to force me out when I wasn’t ready,” he says. “It was very painful, and it actually pushed me away from doing so.” The salacious tone of the coverage only made him more convinced that people would react badly when he did. At 39, it’s clear he’s spent much of his life trying to understand and control his sexuality. “If I had spent a quarter of the time that I spent manipulating my sexuality in front of a piano instead, I would be the most gifted piano player of my lifetime,” he says. “What people were expecting from me was not who I was, and I forced myself to believe that what they wanted could be my truth, my reality, and I went after it hardcore. What I’m trying to say is this: I don’t think I was lying . . . I would have my flings [with men], and I would think, OK, maybe I’m bisexual, but then, no – because I can be with a girl, and it feels amazing.” In his book, Me, he seems genuinely smitten when he writes about his female lovers. He writes of one that “she hated her breasts, but they made me crazy. I loved looking at her body; it was like a painting that I could describe to the last detail. Her legs and the little toes on her feet lit me up. I wanted to devour them – and I always did.” And so these feelings made him think, “I’m not gay,” he says. “And you would watch TV, and you would see this caricature of someone who’s in the LGBT community and you’d say, ‘Well, I’m definitely not that.’ And then you start convincing yourself, or trying to prove to yourself, that you’re not gay. If you add to that the amount of success I was having,” he pounds his fist against his palm, “I’m singing La Vida Loca and enjoying it and being successful and accepted , and I thought, let’s keep pushing towards this, because who’s not seduced by acceptance?” Martin’s early life, particularly his years in the boy band Menudo , would probably have confused any gay child. He grew up in Puerto Rico, the only child of psychologist Enrique Martin and accountant Nereida Morales; his parents split up when he was two, and both had children with other partners, but doted on him. At just three or four, he realised he had an attraction “to my friends, to the same sex – I felt something really magnetic about boys. And then I thought, no, I’m not supposed to be feeling this.’ But it was very powerful.” He was Catholic, believed in the church’s teachings, and loved being an altar boy. “I thought, I’m supposed to like girls, because that’s what the church says, and that’s what my priest told me . . . Unfortunately, according to my faith, what I was feeling was evil, and I struggled.” He always wanted to be in the spotlight, and at nine he started appearing in TV commercials; by 10, in the early 80s, he wanted nothing more than to join Menudo. The band had released their first album in 1977, and had a distinctive structure – when members hit their 16th birthday they would be replaced by someone new. At his first couple of auditions he was too short. But when he was 12, he was accepted, and early the next morning was on his way to the band’s base in Orlando, Florida, to start a new life. His job, from now on, was to be appealing to girls. In his autobiography, Martin says Menudo cost him his childhood, but he equivocates slightly now. “A child is a child, no matter what,” he says. “But I became a rock’n’roll star slash sex symbol at a very young age. I was thinking: what do I have to do to get the attention of the girls? It was my job to move my hips, because then they scream, and that meant I was successful, like the rest of the guys. Was I ready for that? I don’t know. But that’s what I was supposed to go through, according to my karma.” (Martin no longer follows a specific religion – he has a T-shirt that reads “God is too big to fit in one religion” – but he refers to his spiritual beliefs passionately and often. His autobiography begins with a quote from Gandhi, and is sprinkled liberally with references to yoga and swamis, which can be hard to take seriously. At one point in our interview he says: “Buddhism has a very beautiful teaching that says the worst thing you can do to your soul is to tell someone their faith is wrong.” His eyes widen with awe. “And when I heard that I was like: ‘Oooh! That’s a tweet!’”) He says he was 13 “when this obsession with being accepted kicked in. You needed to say yes, because if you said yes, the girls liked you, the girls screamed, and the media would talk about you. I was travelling all over the world, and I had girls following me, private jets, private suites. You would look out of the window and you would have thousands of people . . .” He throws his arms in the air, mimes screaming wildly. The media called it Menuditis. Sounds painful, I say. “Like meningitis!” he laughs. Martin was in the band for five years, and then went to live in New York, where he spent a lot of time sitting on park benches, exhausted and reflective. But he was soon appearing in a musical in Mexico, then a soap opera, and at 18 he signed a contract with Sony Music and began making Spanish language albums. He played a singing bartender on the US soap General Hospital, and by the late 1990s he had an enormous hit with World Cup anthem La Copa de la Vida (The Cup of Life). It reached No1 in more than 60 countries. This led to a star-making performance at the 1999 Grammy Awards, a duet with Madonna, and the release of his first English-language album, Ricky Martin. The standout track, Livin’ La Vida Loca, dominated the summer of 1999 – it was an ear-worm of a song about a wild, superstitious young woman who encourages people to take their clothes off and go dancing in the rain. He was everywhere. The album sold almost 17m copies worldwide, his personal appearances brought Oxford Circus to a halt, it was rumoured his trousers had to be triple-stitched to keep his pelvis-thrusting performances in check and he was the subject of countless drooling interviews about his sex symbol status. He seemed unstoppable, but the pressure of work, and the media attention surrounding his sexuality, started to feel oppressive. So in the early 2000s, he cancelled a concert in Buenos Aires, and went home. “I didn’t like who I was,” he writes in Me. “I moped around my house and had very little sense of humour.” He describes a friend telling him he was screwed up. He responded by throwing a glass against the wall. Was he depressed? “A doctor never told me that,” he says, “so it was not diagnosed. But a lot of people around me were like: ‘Oh my God, we lost him . . .’ But rather than depression, I think it was a touch of rebellion, you know? It was the first time in 10 years that I was relaxing in my house, waking up when I wanted, watching movies until the sun came out, going to a club if I wanted to. It was the first time in my life I was not dealing with a schedule.” Martin continued to record – Spanish-language albums, and the English-language album, Life, which came out in 2005. But his thoughts were turning to family. He wanted children. And so he said: “OK, what are my options? Am I going to adopt? I just sat in front of the computer, doing research, until I found surrogacy, and I was like: ‘Woah! This looks really interesting.’ I interviewed so many people that were part of this beautiful world, and I decided this was going to be my way.” When he told his mother, “she was like ‘surr-o-ga-what? This is like a movie of the future, Rick.’ And I replied, ‘Well, Mom, we’re part of the future.’” He found an egg donor, and another woman to carry the baby, but it was a closed surrogacy – neither woman knew then, or now, that Martin was the father. In August 2008 his twin boys, Matteo and Valentino, were born. He was determined to look after them without help, until his mother said: “‘You’re like a zombie.’ And I’m like, ‘No, I’m noooooooot’” – he pretends to fall asleep, mid-speech – “because I wanted to do it all.” He makes a loud snoring noise, and drops his head again. “And that’s when I said, ‘OK.’” I ask whether he wants more kids, and he says he’d like “a daddy’s girl”. He’s going to be living in New York next year, playing Che Guevara in Evita on Broadway, and he plans to start the whole process again. “I’ll be steady in New York, and then, after I do the play, the baby [will be] born, and I’m going to be able to spend time with her.” It was having his kids that gave Martin the final push to come out; he told Oprah Winfrey last year that he didn’t want his family “to be based on lies”. Still, when it came to announcing the news, he was seriously nervous. “When I pressed send, I was really scared,” he says. “I went to my room, and I was holding my pillow, and three minutes later I called a very good friend and said: ‘Tell me what they’re saying.’ And she’s on the other line, crying: ‘You don’t understand the amount of love you’re receiving.’” He’s been in a relationship for almost four years now, and says that he can’t believe it. “That was not in my plans – not part of the schedule! His name is Carlos, and he’s an amazing human being. He works with the other side of the brain, because he’s a financial adviser, a stockbroker.” Does he think they’ll get married? “It’s funny because, you know, we never talked about it, but now the question is coming up [in interviews] all the time. The other day we were reading a magazine and,” he mimes them looking at each other, “we were like: ‘You’re cool with this, right? No pressure?’ And I’m like: ‘I’m cool, everything is cool.’ Not yet. Whenever it’s time. I would love the option to marry in my land, my island [Puerto Rico], but unfortunately it’s not an option for us yet, which I think is ridiculous. But it’s part of a very beautiful process that’s happening around the world little by little. Hopefully I will see it, and my kids will see it.” Martin’s career will probably never return to its late-90s peak, but it is healthy: he is about to release a new greatest hits collection in the UK, is on a tour that will last until the end of the year and he has 3 million followers on Twitter. Until now, much of his success seems to have been driven by the need to avoid asking himself difficult questions, to keep moving and pushing ahead. Is he still as hungry as ever? “My priorities are different,” he says quietly. “My priorities are: I need to be good; I need to be well within for my children to be well within; and then the creative process flows, organically and smoothly. I’m not looking to experience what I went through in the Livin’ La Vida Loca days again. Now I just get really turned on by the audience.” He pauses significantly. “Really turned on.” Ricky Martin’s Greatest Hits is out now. He plays the HMV Apollo Hammersmith on 12 July. Ricky Martin Gay rights Kira Cochrane guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Via Pension Pulse . It was a gorgeous day in Montreal so I spent the afternoon swimming and tanning while listening to my tunes. But I did manage to hook up with a buddy of mine who flew in to close the sale of his house and visit friends. My buddy is smart and extensive operational experience across manufacturing and the financial industry, most recently managing a major infrastructure project in… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : zero hedge Discovery Date : 20/05/2011 15:02 Number of articles : 7
Continue reading …Feminist reaction against country’s ‘misogynist reflexes’ continues as poll shows voters split on political comeback France is divided over Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s possible return to public life, with 49% of voters saying they would like to see him back on the political scene. But even his allies concede that he would be returning to a country that is much changed. The feminist uproar against machismo, sexism, harassment and what one commentator called the “misogynist reflexes” of France sparked by Strauss-Kahn’s arrest in May shows no signs of abating. In the seven weeks since the Socialist presidential hopeful was charged with attempted rape and sexual assault, French society has undergone massive soul-searching in its attitudes to women. It was not the DSK case itself that sparked feminist street demonstrations but comments by the French elite, perceived as belittling both rape and women. Caroline de Haas, head of the group Osez le Feminisme , said: “The DSK affair showed that women were fed up with inequalities and machismo of French society.” That anger will continue, she warned. More than 40 feminist groups on Sunday held the biggest conference on women’s rights in a decade, with 600 activists present. Some said interest in the feminist cause had been boosted by the DSK affair, which had sparked a surge in calls to rape counsellors in France. Others hoped that doubts over the credibility of the New York maid in the case would not put off other women from reporting rape. According to a poll for Le Parisien newspaper, 60% of leftwing sympathisers want a political comeback by Strauss-Kahn, the Socialist once tipped to beat Nicolas Sarkozy and win the 2012 presidential election. Pollsters are now expected to dissect whether, regardless of the outcome of the case, his popularity among Frenchwomen will have fallen steeply, as some commentators predict. Although free from house arrest, Strauss-Kahn still faces charges of attempted rape and sexual assault. Both sides accept a sexual encounter took place in his New York hotel suite on 14 May – his lawyers say it was consensual, the hotel maid’s lawyers say it was a brutal sex attack. Stéphane Rozès, head of the political consultants CAP, said whether Strauss-Kahn could return would depend on whether he was cleared of all charges and specifically “what explanation is given by the judge”. He said France had been “traumatised” by the case, but one clear change in French life had been a new confidence among women to speak out about sexism and allegations of sex crimes. He said perception of Strauss-Kahn’s political competence had not changed among voters but his perceived “presidential standing” had been dented among both women and men. However, France would not now begin judging politicians “based on their private lives”, he argued, unless their behaviour was criminal. But Le Monde on Sunday showed some taboos had been broken, running a portrait of Strauss-Kahn with personal details that would have been unthinkable two months ago: former advisers and MPs dissected his philandering, womanising and what the paper called a “fatality of temperament”, “taste for pleasure and risk” and a confidence he wouldn’t get caught that verged on “amorality”. The paper detailed how when an adviser warned him about a 2003 story about involvement in an orgy at a swingers’ club he replied: “You’re just jealous.” In April, he had told reporters from Libération: “Yes, I like women, so what?” The paper said very few of his advisers dared warn against his thrill-seeking. Chantal Jouanno, the sports minister who admitted that French politics was so sexist that she dare not wear a skirt in parliament, told Europe 1 radio: “He hasn’t presented a very positive image, between his taste for luxury and other subjects.” The attitude towards alleged sex crimes in French politics seems to have been transformed. Last week saw parliamentary immunity lifted from Georges Tron, the former civil service minister whom President Nicolas Sarkozy forced to resign over sex assault allegations not long after Strauss-Kahn’s arrest. Tron has now been charged with rape and sexual assault relating to allegations that he attacked women who worked for him in his role as mayor in Draveil, south of Paris, for Sarkozy’s UMP. The women said they were emboldened to come forward after the Strauss-Kahn affair. Tron denies the accusations. “Without the psychodrama of New York, would Tron’s accusers have spoken out? And would Nicolas Sarkozy and [the prime minister] François Fillon have ejected a personality who had become a nuisance?” asked the political writer Bruno Dive in Sud Ouest. This week the Socialist party will decide whether to expel the senator Jacques Mahéas, who was convicted of sexual harassment last year. Socialist politician Pierre Moscovici said that Strauss-Kahn was not yet considering a political future in France but was trying to restore his honour after “worldwide humiliation”. Dominique Strauss-Kahn France Europe Feminism Women Gender Angelique Chrisafis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …