Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 185)
Husband, by arrangement

Should love come before marriage, or

Continue reading …
Sean Hannity Mangles Facts and Science About Radiation While Reporting False Alarms

Click here to view this media Sean Hannity’s lead tonight left viewers thinking Southern California is about to be a fallout zone, passengers returning from Japan to Chicago glow in the dark, and we should all have our potassium iodide pills at the ready. It’s classic Fox fearmongering, meant to scare little old ladies and stoke up the heroes in the shadows. He leads with this: The deadly radiation leaking into the atmosphere from Japan’s nuclear crisis isn’t just heading for the United States, it’s already here. Oh really? I checked the radiation monitors online and I couldn’t find any. But listen to Hannity’s grave drone as he reports the dire news: But first, DHS officials have confirmed that two flights departing Tokyo — one bound for Chicago, the other for Dallas — set off radiation alarms when they arrived in the US yesterday. Now in Dallas, tests indicated the presence of low radiation levels in travelers’ luggage, and in the aircraft’s cabin filtration system. No passengers were quarantined and the cabin was ultimately cleared. Of course, I’m sure no one heard that last sentence because they’re all thinking OMG the radiation is already HERE and we’re all dead men walking now. But he doesn’t stop there. After describing the Chicago flight and suggesting that passengers were triggering radiation detectors, he gives us this: Now this as the Golden State braces for a potentially dangerous radioactive plume coming from Japan . Now the United Nations projects that the plume will drift across the Pacific, hitting the Aleutian Islands first and then Southern California. That’ll be late tomorrow. Ok, assuming there is anyone out there who actually wants facts and who actually watched this nonsense from Hannity, here we go. First, as to the DHS reports, here’s the Chicago Tribune story , as posted at 12:55pm today, well ahead of Hannity’s breathless report: The Department of Homeland Security is screening passengers and cargo entering the United States from Japan for “even a blip of radiation,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Thursday. Customs and Border Protection said there have been reports of radiation being detected from some cargo arriving from Japan at several airports. Those airports include Chicago, Dallas and Seattle. Radiation has not been detected in passengers or luggage. And none of the reported incidents involved dangerous or harmful amounts of radiation. The agency handles more than half a million radiation alarms a year, though many are related to medical procedures. Hardly the same as his report, which says they “detected radiation”. Now let’s talk about that “radioactive plume” heading right for my front yard. And let’s talk about Hannity’s report that makes it sound like it’s an absolutely-for-sure-it’s-gonna-happen-any-minute kind of thing. From the New York Times, who originated the report yesterday: A United Nations forecast of the possible movement of the radioactive plume coming from crippled Japanese reactors shows it churning across the Pacific, and touching the Aleutian Islands on Thursday before hitting Southern California late Friday. What odds do you give a weather report? A United Nations forecast of possible movement is not the same thing as it’s definitely going to happen, brace yourselves, go indoors, lock the doors and windows and put wet towels over your face moment. It’s just not. My problem with reporting like this is that it’s “War of the Worlds” hysterical reporting. If a radioactive plume is heading to California, there’s not a darn thing I can do about it. It’s not like the Japanese intentionally unleashed this after they caused a 9.0 earthquake and a 30-foot tsunami, for heavens’ sake. There’s also no way to “brace” for such a thing. So how about some real facts around what MIGHT come our way and what to do? Here’s an excellent, science-based FAQ from UC Berkeley that might help allay fears: Q: There are reports of a plume of radiation headed for the United States that is expected to hit California on Friday. What is the danger to people on the West Coast? The short answer is, essentially none. There is no such thing as zero risk, but the risk from the radiation from Japan is orders of magnitude from being dangerous, by any definition. To put it into perspective, I live in the hills above the stadium, which is at a higher elevation than the campus and gets more radiation from cosmic rays. The difference between the radiation I receive in my office down on campus and what I receive at my house is many times more than you’d get from this plume. Most of the human-caused radiation we receive these days actually comes from medical procedures, but there are also radiation risks from living at higher elevations, or taking a plane flight. We will be able measure whatever radiation gets here, no question. The nuclear engineering department has monitors on its roof to measure the radiation. But just because you can measure it doesn’t mean it’s dangerous. Even after the Chernobyl accident, which released a million times more radiation than has been released in Japan and produced a plume that went all over the planet, there was absolutely no risk to people in the United States. The pictures on the Web showing a very dangerous-looking plume coming across the Pacific Ocean is a wonderful testament to our ability to measure things, but the radiation we measure is not a risk of any consequence. The only thing I’m bracing for tomorrow is the rain coming in over the weekend which will screw up my plans to go mountain bike riding. But for Hannity, maybe the world could end. Just for him?

Continue reading …
Marsha Blackburn Defends Defunding NPR and Helping the GOP to Assure the Public is as Uninformed as Possible

Click here to view this media Rep. Marsha Blackburn took to the House floor this Thursday during the debate over NPR’s government funding and she basically laid out their game plan for rural areas that are going to be harmed by these cuts — let them start over with new programming instead of airing NPR’s content. Anyone else think that content that will be replaced by anything other than the equivalent of Fox “News” and right wing talk? And she also took a shot at NPR’s listeners who are apparently all rich, latte drinking snobby liberals who should be able to afford to keep the network on the air on their own… unless of course you consider those rural areas that are going to be hit the hardest by these cuts. House Republicans continually cited the discredited tapes from James O’Keefe as a reason to cut off funding for the network during the debate and also pretended that this was done out of some deep concern for our budget deficit woes, even though they haven’t expressed similar concerns for busting the budget with illegal invasions that weren’t even put on the books or tax cuts for the rich. Blackburn’s assertion that they did this because they have one iota of concern for the budget deficit is laughable. As the Democrats continually pointed out during the House floor debate, this was done purely for ideological reasons and nothing else. They want our public fed a steady stream of right wing propaganda and dumbed down with as little access to news that isn’t influenced by their agenda as possible, and this is just one more step in assuring that happens. I’d say that Blackburn and her ilk should be ashamed of themselves for this, but they’ve long ago proven that they just have no shame.

Continue reading …
NPR’s Liasson Omits Critics of ‘Comprehensive’ Immigration Reform

On Friday's Morning Edition, NPR's Mara Liasson conspicuously excluded conservatives who are opposed to “comprehensive” immigration reform proposals, such as those forwarded by former President George W. Bush, during a report on Utah's new and “milder” immigration law. Liasson emphasized the state's ” conservative politics ,” but couldn't find any conservatives who opposed the law. Host Renee Montagne introduced the correspondent's report by highlighting how ” Arizona's tough immigration law has received extensive coverage, and there's been a lot of talk about similar measures in other states. Yet, one of Arizona's neighbors, also known for its conservative politics , has taken a very different approach.” Liasson set up her report by underscoring Utah's conservative credentials: “If you were to choose a state that would allow illegal immigrants to come out of the shadows, work and drive without fear of deportation, you probably wouldn't pick Utah.” The first sound bite in the report, which came from Alfonso Aguilar of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, backed up the NPR reporter's line: ” We have to understand, Utah is one of the most conservative states in the country .” Liasson continued that Aguilar, who worked under former President Bush as the head of the U.S. Office of Citizenship, ” says the new Utah law shows Republicans can find a middle course .” She followed this with a second clip from the Hispanic proponent of the law. Liasson noted that “the governor of Utah signed a package of immigration bills. One is an enforcement law, milder than Arizona's, but still opposed by liberal immigration advocates . Another is a guest worker law, that's opposed by some conservatives as amnesty .” But instead of tracking down such a conservative, she turned to the legislator who wrote that law, Utah State Representative Bill Wright, who “says he was just trying to deal with reality.” After playing a clip from the Republican politician, Liasson noted that “Wright's new Utah guest permit law says that if you pay a fine, have no criminal record, and are working, you can stay in Utah. This has thrilled immigration reform advocates, like Frank Sharry .” The correspondent didn't give Sharry's left-of-center political affiliation at any point during her report, despite playing two sound bites from him. It shouldn't be surprising that Liasson chose to omit tough conservative voices on the immigration issue, given her network's record of liberal bias. The full transcript of Mara Liasson's report from Friday's Morning Edition: RENEE MONTAGNE: Arizona's tough immigration law has received extensive coverage, and there's been a lot of talk about similar measures in other states. Yet, one of Arizona's neighbors, also known for its conservative politics, has taken a very different approach. NPR's national political correspondent Mara Liasson reports. MARA LIASSON: If you were to choose a state that would allow illegal immigrants to come out of the shadows, work and drive without fear of deportation, you probably wouldn't pick Utah. ALFONSO AGUILAR: And we have to understand, Utah is one of the most conservative states in the country. LIASSON: Alfonso Aguilar runs the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles. He says the new Utah law shows Republicans can find a middle course. AGUILAR: The governor's Republican, the House and Senate are dominated by Republicans, and they saw what happened in Arizona. They passed an enforcement-only law. It has driven away investment, business, workers that the Arizona economy needs. So they [the Utah government] wanted to deal with enforcement, but balance it with measures that are more business-friendly, and that's exactly what they did. LIASSON: Last Wednesday, the governor of Utah signed a package of immigration bills. One is an enforcement law, milder than Arizona's, but still opposed by liberal immigration advocates. Another is a guest worker law, that's opposed by some conservatives as amnesty. But State Representative Bill Wright, who wrote the law, says he was just trying to deal with reality. There are 11 million illegal immigrants in America, and they are not going to be deported. UTAH STATE REPRESENTATIVE BILL WRIGHT: I'm of the opinion we really don't have the ability as a society to remove that large a portion of a segment from our society. A lot of these people are intertwined in our society. They have financial obligations. They have bank notes. They've bought houses. They contribute. They have jobs. So it is- let's operate on this premise. LIASSON: Wright's new Utah guest permit law says that if you pay a fine, have no criminal record, and are working, you can stay in Utah. This has thrilled immigration reform advocates, like Frank Sharry. FRANK SHARRY, FOUNDER, AMERICA'S VOICE: The Utah legislation is a very rough draft of what we call comprehensive immigration reform at the national level. It combines enforcement and a program to make those here legal. Frankly, what you have is, in a ruby-red state, some legislators and the governor and the Mormon Church and a conservative think tank leading the way towards a more enlightened approach on immigration. LIASSON: Sharry's referring to the Utah Compact, a group convened with the governor's blessing, to come up with an alternative to the Arizona approach. Alfonso Aguilar hopes it will have an impact on the stalled immigration debate in Washington. AGUILAR: We need a federal solution. Hopefully, this will pressure the government, the federal government, to do something. LIASSON: Now, along comes Utah, asking the federal government to do something very soon. As Bill Wright explains, Utah needs the Obama administration to give it a waiver, so it can enact a guest worker law. WRIGHT: Up to this point, the federal government has proved that they're null and void of any ideas. Because of the political environment there, they have not been able to accomplish it. We're asking them, take a look at this. We want some action. We want something done. LIASSON: The last attempt at national immigration reform died in the Senate in December, and although the debate in Washington seems hopelessly polarized, there are Republicans who fear they can't win a presidential election if their party continues to be seen as anti-Hispanic, and President Obama may fear he can't face Hispanic voters in 2012 without trying again to fulfill his promise to pass immigration reform. So, says Frank Sharry, how the administration responds to Utah's request for a waiver will be an important test. SHARRY: At the end of the day, a fifty-state patchwork of policies isn't the solution. But in order to really change this debate, and show that there's a more sensible way to approach it, the Obama administration would be very wise to engage with the conservatives from Utah who want to move forward on this. LIASSON: The White House has been planning to make another push for immigration legislation sometime in the next couple of months. Utah's new guest worker law could force the President to speed up his timetable. Mara Liasson, NPR News, Washington. — Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. You can follow him on Twitter here .

Continue reading …
CBS Finally Covers NPR Scandal…On 4 A.M. News Program

Following the March 8 release of an undercover sting video of NPR executive Ron Schiller calling Tea Party members “racist,” CBS initially gave no coverage to the ensuing scandal and resignations of him and NPR President Vivian Schiller. However, it turns out that the controversy was covered by a CBS News broadcast, the barely-watched 4 A.M. Morning News. On Thursday's CBS Evening News, anchor Katie Couric did a news brief on House Republicans voting to de-fund NPR: “Republicans say NPR does well enough to fund itself, but Democrats say a cutoff of federal money would cripple some 600 public radio stations.” She failed to make any mention of the scandal that preceded the vote. On the March 10 CBS Morning News at 4 A.M. ET, anchor Betty Nguyen did only a slightly longer news brief on the release of the sting video: 4:11AM ET

Continue reading …
CBS Finally Covers NPR Scandal…On 4 A.M. News Program

Following the March 8 release of an undercover sting video of NPR executive Ron Schiller calling Tea Party members “racist,” CBS initially gave no coverage to the ensuing scandal and resignations of him and NPR President Vivian Schiller. However, it turns out that the controversy was covered by a CBS News broadcast, the barely-watched 4 A.M. Morning News. On Thursday's CBS Evening News, anchor Katie Couric did a news brief on House Republicans voting to de-fund NPR: “Republicans say NPR does well enough to fund itself, but Democrats say a cutoff of federal money would cripple some 600 public radio stations.” She failed to make any mention of the scandal that preceded the vote. On the March 10 CBS Morning News at 4 A.M. ET, anchor Betty Nguyen did only a slightly longer news brief on the release of the sting video: 4:11AM ET

Continue reading …
River plunge father guilty of murder

Christopher Grady, who tried to kill six-year-old son in same incident, faces life sentence A father is facing a life sentence after being convicted of murdering his five-year-old daughter by deliberately driving his car into a freezing river with her inside. Christopher Grady, 42, was also found guilty of attempting to murder his son, then six, who was also in the car. Birmingham crown court heard that Grady drove to the house of his estranged partner, Kim Smith, in Evesham, Worcestershire, in February last year, telling her: “You’ve got 10 seconds to say goodbye to your kids, and then they are dead.” With his daughter, Gabrielle, and son, Ryan, inside the Vauxhall Vectra, Grady circled a field before driving at speed into the river Avon. Two police officers pulled Ryan from the water but Gabrielle was trapped inside the vehicle for two hours. She died in hospital three days later. The jury took five hours to deliver an 11-1 majority verdict that he intended to kill his children. The judge, Mr Justice Lindblom, adjourned sentencing until next week but told Grady that he faced a mandatory life sentence. The court heard that Grady, who had regular access to his children following the breakdown of his seven-year relationship with Smith, faced personal and financial difficulties and had been evicted from his flat. West Mercia police were contacted six times about Grady’s behaviour before the murder. However, an investigation overseen by the Independent Police Complaints Commission ruled that officers could not have prevented the tragedy. Smith, reading a brief statement on the steps of the court, said: “Although Christopher Grady is facing a deserved jail term, this does not take away the fact that myself and my family were robbed of our Gabby just over one year ago and that will stay. We are still living with the loss and devastation. “What must also not be forgotten is what my son Ryan also went through on that day – not only the trauma of the events but that he also lost his sister, who was also his best friend.” Asked about the morning of the murder, Smith said: “Horrifying, the worst experience ever, absolutely shook to the core. He said, ‘Be outside, you have 10 seconds to say ta-ra to the children, the kids’.” Grady’s mother, Valerie Hubbarb, said: “Unfortunately there are no winners in this case. We are all losers, as our darling Gabby is no longer with us.” The officer in charge of the case, Superintendent Steve Cullen, praised the two officers who rescued Ryan, adding: “I would like to mention the force’s admiration for Gabby and Ryan’s mum, Kim, and the rest of their family for the dignity and strength they have shown.” Crime Peter Walker guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

On Friday, The Washington Post clearly displayed its bias in favor of liberal NPR with two supportive editorials (including one from a “conservative”) and a slanted news story on Thursday's House vote on NPR. That story, by Felicia Sonmez , had a 6-to-4 tilt in quotes toward NPR advocates — if you don't consider Republicans NPR advocates. Sonmez only found NPR lovers among the Republicans to quote, and left out all the arguments about high salaries and liberal elitism and bias. In fact, the word “liberal” doesn't appear in the article: Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier (R-Calif.) said he appreciated some of NPR’s programming but added that “half the American people have never even heard of, much less even listened to, NPR.” Rep. Rich Nugent (R-Fla.) argued that those watching the House debate on Thursday were likely watching it on C-SPAN, which doesn’t receive federal funding. “A lot of us like NPR,” he said, later adding: “We’re not trying to harm NPR. We’re actually trying to liberate them from federal tax dollars.”

Continue reading …
How to Boost Your Retirement Confidence

According to a new national survey, just 13 percent of Americans feel “very confident” they will have a comfortable retirement. That’s a record low. At the same time, a record 27 percent of Americans report they are “not at all confident” in being able to save their way toward a comfortable retirement. That’s two sides of the same troubling coin. What should be a life stage that we look forward to has become a major source of anxiety instead. I hear it in your voices and see it in your faces when you talk to me. Your fears about being able to retire comfortably and with dignity are weighing you down. It’s hard to enjoy the present when you’re worried about the future. That’s no way to live. I have no quick or easy fix to offer, but I do have a way forward. Stand In Your Truth You probably think your retirement hinges on a multitude of financial decisions — choosing the right asset allocation for your 401(k); figuring out if you should convert to a Roth IRA; deciding whether to pay off the mortgage before retirement or focus on saving more. Those are indeed all vitally important issues to navigate. But even more crucial to putting you on a more confident path is the singular act of standing in your truth — that is, taking a fresh accounting of where you are at today, and where you want to be 20, or 30 or 40 years from now. Sound simple? Well, not based on my experience. When I ask people how much they have saved for retirement in their 401(k), they typically start by saying, “Well, before the crash…” Or when I ask someone what their house is worth, the response I get is something along the lines of, “Well, we paid…” or, “Back in 2007 it was worth…” I didn’t ask what you had in the past. I asked what you have today. It is only when you are willing to take a clear-eyed look at where you stand today that you can build a more secure future. Live Below Your Means But Within Your Needs The single most common lament I hear when it comes to retirement is, “I wish I could save for retirement, but I just don’t have the money left over at the end of the month to invest.” My reply: If you can’t afford to save while you have a paycheck coming in, how are you going to be able to pay the bills when you retire? Don’t expect Social Security to do the heavy lifting for you; the current average retirement benefit is less than $1,200 a month. If retirement comfort is what you’re after, Social Security should be seen as a complement to your personal savings, not a total solution. And to generate those savings, you need to find a way to live below your means, so you in fact have some money each month that can be saved for your future. If that seems impossible, I think you are still a few steps short of standing in your truth. Take Care Of Your Kids By Taking Care Of Your Retirement Needs There is simply no bigger gift you can give your kids than the assurance that you will in fact be financially secure when you retire. If you’re currently in a position where you are helping out your parents, or are worried about their security, I imagine this is abundantly clear. But are you doing your very best to make sure your own kids will not have the same worries and responsibilities? This is never my most popular advice, but it is in fact my most important: Make saving for your retirement your priority. If that means your child attends public school rather than private so you can focus on your 401(k) and IRAs rather than tuitions, that’s the honest move to make. If that means your child attends a less expensive college because you don’t save as much in a 529 plan, or your child has to rely on federal Stafford loans and financial aid, so be it. An affordable college education is one that does not derail the parents’ retirement savings. Find The Pleasure In Saving If all that sounds like drudgery, I think you’re missing a great opportunity to shed layers of financial anxiety. There is no question that saving more today means spending less today. There’s no way around that simple fact. But rather than see this as an exercise in denying yourself spending pleasures, what if you managed to find an equal pleasure in saving? After all, it is the saving you can manage today that will put a comfortable retirement well within your reach. *** Suze Orman’s new book, “The Money Class: Learn to Create Your New American Dream” (Spiegel & Grau), includes more than 100 pages of detailed strategies to boost your retirement confidence. Learn more about Suze at www.SuzeOrman.com.

Continue reading …

5 Dead In Plane Crash At Long Beach Airport In CA 5 dead in plane crash at Long Beach airport in CA watch 5 dead in plane crash at Long Beach airport in CA long beach airport – kripes.com WASHINGTON – The House Thursday decisively rejected a resolution directing the president to withdraw long beach airport . forces from Afghanistan this year, but the vote also showed a deep divide in the president’s own party on the war … Long Beach Airport | Events Trend A fourth victim has been identified in the crash of twin-engine plane to Long Beach airport last week that killed five people and left another in critical condition. The accident occurred at 10:30 am the plane took off from Long Beach … Plane blows up at Long Beach Airport | OFW News On Web Moments after its takeoff Wednesday, a twin-engine plane owned by Carde Equipment Sales LLC en route to Salt Lake City blasted in a ball of flames at the Long Beach Airport in Long Beach, California, 10 miles to the south of Los Angeles … Long Beach Airport Beechcraft King Air Plane Crash | Today's Headlines A Beechcraft King Air plane crashed at Long Beach Airport on Wednesday. According to the report, five of the six passengers were killed. The lone survivor is seriously injured. The group were on their way to ski in Park City, … Long Beach Airport | US Breaking News New York (TheStreet) – “Airport to Long Beach” is the search going net after killing five men and one was seriously injured in a plane crash in L…

Continue reading …