Anyone who’s ever seen Jay Leno do one of his “Jaywalking” segments on NBC, locating average Americans and asking them factual questions on street corners, knows there are far too many Americans who know next to nothing about just about everything. They can’t name our first president, or don’t even know what the phrase “founding fathers” means. Ask them to name our current vice president and watch the brain waves flatline. Newsweek magazine recently announced its disgust after it offered the government’s official citizenship test (the one we require immigrants to pass before being naturalized) to 1,000 Americans. Thirty-eight percent of the sample failed. Newsweek worried in its headline: “The country's future is imperiled by our ignorance.” The magazine was careful enough to report that civic ignorance isn’t new. One study found the yearly shifts in civic knowledge since World War II have averaged out to “slightly under 1 percent.” But it worried that today’s interconnected world is “becoming more and more inhospitable to incurious know-nothings – like us.” It’s easy to get discouraged with the results. Sixty-five percent couldn't figure out that the Constitution was penned and adopted at the Constitutional Convention; 63 couldn’t identify how many justices were on the Supreme Court (nine); and 73 percent couldn’t identify that communism was what we opposed in the Cold War. Current national leaders aren’t so well known: 29 percent could not identify the current vice president (Joe Biden) and twice that percentage didn’t could identify the Speaker of the House (John Boehner). Let’s start with the positive angle here. It’s a terrific idea to examine whether native-born citizens can pass the citizenship test, and an astonishing embarrassment to learn how many can’t. Some public schools have used the citizenship test as a social-studies project in civic knowledge. A daring principal could make passage of the citizenship test a high-school graduation requirement. Promoting better civic and historical knowledge is an important cause.
Continue reading …Liberal Democrat leader to push for changes to health and social care bill Nick Clegg told a meeting of his MPs in Westminster on Tuesdayyesterday that he would now be “taking the lead” within government to rein in its programme of reform for the NHS. The Liberal Democrat leader said he was determined to ensure changes were made to the health and social care bill, the clearest sign that he will personally negotiate with the health secretary, Andrew Lansley. A senior party source said that the Lib Dem leader had decided to “front up” the issue with the Conservatives. Lansley’s reforms to the NHS – handing over a majority of the healthcare budget to GPs for commissioning, and scrapping primary care trusts – have been opposed by some Conservative MPs and the British Medical Association, and 10 days ago Lib Dems voted at their spring party conference to ensure modifications were made to the bill. Then it was suggested that even though the Lib Dems had registered their discontent, there was little their leader would be able to do within government. Now Clegg’s aides say he will push for alterations to the bill, including beefing up the governance and accountability while minimising the financial risk of the new GP consortiums, and having some limits on the types of new private providers that can come into the system. Clegg’s closest colleagues – his parliamentary adviser Norman Lamb and the chief secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander – have been newly charged with liasing with their backbench MPs and the wider party, to secure policy modifications. There is speculation that Clegg’s opposition to the bill would delay it until beyond the Easter recess as officials work behind the scenes to reformulate a bill to the tastes of the Lib Dems. However a source said Tuesday that it might not be necessary to delay the bill with changes being tabled in the House of Lords stage instead. Clegg addressed his MPs hours after Lansley went before the commons health select committee to explain the progress of the bill. He surprised some MPs when he admitted they were “still thinking through” what would happen should one of the newly empowered GP consortia go bust. Lansley said: “The responsibility lies with the NHS commissioning board. To identify and then intervene – they will have powers to take over responsibility or ask another hospital to take over.” But he said there was still a debate about what would be the “trigger” for the NHS commissioning board to step in. In an overture to those concerned about the reforms, and in a nod to the parliamentary push back from Clegg’s team, Lansley said there would be “opportunities to clarify, if not improve, the bill as it goes through parliament.” Lansley insisted that the bill was compatible with EU law and that he was supported by legal advice. But when pressed five times by Labour MP Valerie Vaz to publish the exact legal advice, he appeared to refuse. The level of confusion was such that the committee’s chair Stephen Dorrell asked for a note of clarification on the issues of competition. He also admitted that the government had not yet worked out the role of Monitor, the regulatory body that ensures fair play between GP consortia. The Tory MP for Totnes, and a GP, Sarah Wollaston suggested that without clear legislated restrictions the “public interest” of Monitor was “clearly open to interpretation”. Lansley committed to sending a written explanation on the regulatory body. Lansley said the current debate was turning on an incorrect sum and that the size of the budget being handed to GPs was not £80bn as has been accepted but £60bn, owing to elements within the budget being redirected to areas like public health and regional specialised services which will not be channelled through GP consortia. Nick Clegg NHS Health Andrew Lansley GPs Liberal Democrats Conservatives Liberal-Conservative coalition Allegra Stratton guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Despite rise in inflation and borrowing, chancellor to court medium earners in ‘steady-as-she-goes’ financial package George Osborne will seek to appeal to Britain’s “squeezed middle” when he announces help for first-time buyers, motorists and 25 million income tax payers in a budget designed to tighten the Treasury’s grip over public spending. Despite disappointing news for the public finances, the chancellor is expected to say that he has scope to raise the income tax personal allowance by £600 next year, fund a £250m shared equity scheme for new homes and defer the above-inflation increase in petrol duty due next month. But Osborne will balance tax giveaways with fresh tax-raising measures, a crackdown on tax avoidance and “special measures” for overspending Whitehall departments in what sources insisted would be a “steady-as-she-goes” package. The chancellor will outline a range of measures – including a shake-up of planning laws, deregulation of employment laws affecting small businesses, and the long-awaited plans for a green investment bank as the coalition government seeks to shift the focus of the economy from deficit reduction to boosting growth. Osborne will admit that the UK’s growth prospects for 2011 have worsened since last autumn, with the independent Office for Budget Responsibility likely to pencil in an increase of around 1.8% in gross domestic product this year against the 2.1% it forecast last November. But the chancellor will signal his determination not to let the government’s deficit reduction plans slip, with fresh controls designed to intensify pressure on ministers to rein in spending. Departments that fail to manage their budgets properly will be placed in special measures – akin to the Ofsted rating given to a failing school – with tough penalties. These could include fines for overspending or being forced to seek Treasury authorisation for larger spending decisions. City hopes that public borrowing for 2010-11 would come in £10bn below the £148bn forecast received a dent with news that the deficit in February topped £10bn – the highest for the month since modern records began in 1993. Meanwhile, inflation according to the consumer price index rose from 4% to a 28-month high of 4.4% last month, pushing up government spending on state benefits. Dearer food, fuel and clothing were the main factors behind last month’s jump in inflation, which is now more than double the government’s 2% target. The increase in the CPI measure of inflation was matched by a rise in the alternative yardstick of the cost of living, the retail prices index, which rose from 5.1% to 5.5% last month, its highest for 20 years. In a move that will please the Liberal Democrat wing of the coalition, Osborne will say that the income tax personal allowance, due to go up to £7,475 next month, will be raised by more than inflation from next year. The increase of around £600 – which comes on top of the £1,000 rise next month – will be worth an average of £45 a year for taxpayers earning up to £115,000 a year. The 550,000 taxpayers who earn more than £115,000 will lose £45 a year because they no longer have a personal allowance. Osborne will announce a joint scheme with the construction industry to help some of the potential first-time buyers currently frozen out of the housing market. First-time buyers with a household income of less than £60,000 a year who can put down a 5% deposit on a new home will be eligible for an equity loan worth up to 20% of the value of the property jointly funded by the government and housebuilders. The loan will be interest-free for five years and only be repayable when the house is sold. With most first-time buyers only able to secure mortgages worth 75% of a property’s value, Osborne is expected to say his scheme will give some young people the chance to meet the exacting loan standards demanded by lenders in the wake of the financial crisis, lead to the building of 10,000 new homes and protect 40,000 jobs in the construction industry. The year long cabinet battle over Britain’s ability to invest in the next generation of green infrastructure will be resolved when a green investment bank is established with access to up to £3bn of funds, and an ability to borrow from April 2015. Green groups will be disappointed about the deferral of borrowing powers, but pleased at the higher than expected interim funding. The battle over the bank was resolved on Sunday and the outcome reflects a wider political struggle to ensure plans in the budget to ease pressure on the squeezed middle, including freezing planned fuel duty rises, does not strip the coalition of its green credentials. Ministers admit the deferral of the bank’s borrowing powers to 2015-16 reflects Treasury determination to ensure net debt as a percentage of GDP is falling by 2015-16. But they also argue that decisions on the next big wave of green investment projects, including offshore wind farms, do not need to be made until after 2015. In a negotiating success for Chris Huhne, the energy secretary, the bank will be given access to £1bn of funds from 2012-13, as opposed to the earlier plan to wait until 2013-4. The bank will also be given access from 2012-13 to £775m from the asset sales from HS1, the superfast rail track between London and the Channel tunnel. In addition the bank will have access to £1bn from the sales from 2013-14 from Urenco, the company that makes enriched uranium from nuclear power. The government owns a third of Urenco jointly with the Dutch government and German energy companies RWE and E.On. The Treasury has given a guarantee that if the income from the sale of Urenco is not forthcoming, the green bank will have access to other funds. Budget 2011 George Osborne Conservatives Tax and spending Budget Property Family finances Motoring Borrowing & debt Inflation Larry Elliott Patrick Wintour Polly Curtis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Koopwoning: Molenschotsebaan 21, Molenschot Tanzania – World Water Day Koopwoning: Dr Ahaushof 6, Tilburg World Water Day: 8 Ways To Get Involved Around the world, over 1 billion people lack access to clean drinking water . Each year, World Water Day calls international attention to the plight of communities with inadequate access to water and sanitation. Minister Kaieda sorry for reportedly 'forcing' water -spraying … Industry minister Banri Kaieda apologized Tuesday over reports that he threatened to ”punish” fire fighters if they did not carry out an operation to spray water toward a quake-hit nuclear reactor building in Fukushima Prefecture. … 44 per cent Pakistanis drinking unsafe water as world observes … Islamabad, Mar 22: As many as 72 million Pakistanis out of a 180-million population do not have access to safe drinking water as the country observes World Water Day today. According to Environment Ministry sources, … Texas agency to vote on contaminated water wells | The Associated … Texas regulators are to decide whether they agree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s conclusion that a gas driller is responsible for contaminating water wells in North Texas. XE.com – Japan tests sea- water radiation levels near damaged … Japanese authorities began testing for radiation in sea- water off a badly damaged nuclear plant on Tuesday although officials stressed that elevated levels already detected were no cause for worry. mediumfan says: Helping people get safe water . Join me at http://bit.ly/gnaYVS #water2011
Continue reading …Angry Birds Rio Angry Birds Rio Video Angry Birds Rio Gameplay & Quick Look Angry Birds Rio hits the App Store | 9 to 5 Mac Angry Birds Rio … Send Tips. Please re-type the two CAPTCHA words. (X) Nevermind. 9to5mac.com · Industry Intel · Apple Inc · iOS Devices · Enterprise · Tips and Tricks · Apps · Toys · Reviews · Angry Birds Rio hits the App Store … Download Angry Birds Rio for iPhone, iPad and iPod touch Today! Download Angry Birds Rio for iPhone, iPad and iPod touch today. Angry Birds Rio has been released for iPhone and iPod touch whereas Angry Birds Rio HD has been released for the iPad. Angry Birds Rio for iPhone, iPad released! | TiPb The much anticipated sequel to Angry Birds, Angry Birds Rio is starting to hit the App Store! New Zealand got it first but it’ll keep rolling out over the. Angry Birds Rio Arrives On iOS, Android And Mac | Geeky Gadgets If you are an Angry Birds fan you will be pleased to know that Angry Birds Rio is now available on Android, Mac and iOS devices. The new game features the same slingshot action and mechanics as the original game but now takes you to Rio … Angry Birds Rio Released for iPhone and iPad | The iPhone and iPad … The sequel to Angry Birds that we were looking forward to, the Angry Birds Rio , has just been released on the App Store for iPhone and iPad users to. roneyb says: RT @IntoMobile : Amazon Appstore for Android opens its virtual doors; Offers Angry Birds Rio for free! http://t.co/wRzzDeN via @jesperrhode
Continue reading …Of the three morning shows, only ABC's Good Morning America on Tuesday highlighted anger and dismay on Capitol Hill that Barack Obama did not seek congressional approval for air strikes against Libya. Reporter Jake Tapper pointed out the “real disappointment” felt by “all the Republicans I spoke to and the liberal Democrats.” An ABC graphic asserted, “Obama faces critics on Libya.” Yet, although NBC's Today found time for the latest on Charlie Sheen's escapades, the program couldn't manage a full report on Barack Obama's decision bomb Libya. CBS's Early Show also failed to cover this aspect of the story. Tapper related, “There was a conference call over the weekend in which one Democrat, one liberal Democrat, read a quote from candidate Obama about the need to seek congressional approval before taking military action and the member of Congress said, 'I agree with candidate Obama.'” The exact quote from then-Senator Obama in 2007: The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. When George W. Bush was President, journalists were much more interested in congressional approval for conflicts such as Iraq. See a post by the MRC's Rich Noyes for more. A transcript of the March 22 GMA segment can be found below: ABC GRAPHIC: Obama Faces Critics on Libya ROBIN ROBERTS: Let's turn now to Jake Tapper at the White House where he's tracking the latest out of Libya. And, Jake, what is the situation right now with the coalition? JAKE TAPPER: Well, there have been a lot of reports about the coalition fraying, but the White House is pushing back on those reports. They're saying that the coalition is growing and that yesterday, for the first time, allies flew more missions over Libya than the U.S. did. Of course, even with that news, there are reports of the UAE hesitating before contributing any military, of Norway turning its pilots back because they weren't sure who was going to be in charge. So, it is still a work in progress, this coalition, Robin. ROBERTS: And back here at home is the U.S. Congress united in how to handle this, Jake? TAPPER: I was e-mailing all night with members of the House and Senate and there is some real disappointment. It seems to be, basically, all the Republicans I spoke to and the liberal Democrats. There was a conference call over the weekend in which one Democrat, one liberal Democrat, read a quote from candidate Obama about the need to seek congressional approval before taking military action and the member of Congress said, “I agree with candidate Obama.” But, the White House is saying they are consulting, but this was a very fast moving process and one senior White House official said, “Last week, some critics on Capitol Hill were complaining we were going to slow. Now they're complaining we're going to fast.” Robin? ROBERTS: They hear that. All right, Jake Tapper. — Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.
Continue reading …The Obama administration launched its air war against Moammar Qaddafi’s Libya after a vote of the UN Security Council, but without any congressional authorization — and apparently not even very much consultation with congressional leaders. A review of the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from Friday night through Monday night finds virtually no network interest in Obama’s bypassing of Congress — an attitude in stark contrast to their approach to the Bush administration during the run-up to the Iraq war in late 2002. (Video montage below jump.) With Libya, only the NBC Nightly News has even mentioned the controversy over the Obama administration’s decision to cut Congress out of the decision-making. On the March 20 Nightly News, White House correspondent Chuck Todd offered one sentence taking note of John Boehner’s objections in a laundry list of other congressional complaints: You've seen a lot of members of Congress go out today and the President's been criticized, both left and right, some because — arguing that he's taken too long. Speaker Boehner is upset that he hasn't done enough consultation with Congress. And, of course, some of the liberal members of the president's own party are upset that he's started yet another military campaign. Todd revisited the issue on Monday’s Nightly News, relaying the White House line that the real problem was that Obama was on foreign trip and could not easily meet one-on-one with members of Congress. “Yes, they [White House officials] were able to let them [congressional leaders] know on the Friday before they left what they were going to do,” Todd argued before admitting, “but there wasn’t real consultation.” On Monday’s World News, ABC’s Jake Tapper offered a story summarizing the White House response to several congressional criticisms, but not the lack of consultation/authorization. (Tapper did emphasize the lack of consultation question on Tuesday’s Good Morning America, however.) Eight years ago, MRC’s Geoff Dickens discovered in a review, the networks were deeply concerned over whether the Bush administration might launch military action against Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship without congressional approval (a much higher threshold than mere consultation). ABC’s Peter Jennings opened the August 29, 2002 World News Tonight by wondering, “ Could the President, would the President go ahead without Congressional approval? ” Three days later on CBS’s Face the Nation, fill-in host John Roberts hit Democratic moneyman Terry McAuliffe with the same question: “House Minority Leader Gephardt said last week that ‘It's got to come to a vote, some kind of a vote.’ Do you believe that the President needs to go to Congress? ” McAuliffe was emphatic: “ Well, I think the President should. I think he needs to get a mandate from the American public and from Congress. ” That same day, on ABC’s This Week (then co-hosted by Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts), ABC correspondent Claire Shipman made the same point during the roundtable: “ Obviously the White House will go to Congress. They would be crazy not to. “ Bush administration officials at the time made public statements indicating that congressional approval was not necessary, strictly speaking, because Saddam Hussein's regime was in violation of the 1991 resolutions that certified the first Iraq war. But both the media and congressional Democrats insisted that such a major new commitment of U.S. military resources needed its own approval, which was forthcoming in October 2002 (by lopsided votes in both the House and the Senate). In this case, the Obama administration seems to be resting its legal authorization solely on the United Nations, a point NBC’s Todd alluded to on Saturday’s Nightly News: “He’s [President Obama is] always going to want these multilateral coalitions; and not just a group of countries, but getting it legally, basically getting the legal justification from institutions like the United Nations and the Arab League, both of which we saw today.” It’s unclear if the United Nations, let alone the Arab League, can “legally” authorize any activity by the U.S. military. The President can certainly take pre-emptive action without immediate congressional approval to protect U.S. lives and interests, but Obama refused to harshly condemn the Qaddafi regime until U.S. citizens had been evacuated from Libya. A news story in today’s New York Times (page A12) does, however, include a graph noting candidate Obama’s rhetoric from 2007: “‘The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,’ Mr. Obama told the Boston Globe in 2007.’”
Continue reading …MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Philippine lawmakers impeached the country’s chief anti-corruption investigator Tuesday in a move that could clear the way to prosecute the country’s former president. Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez has been accused of failing to investigate allegations against former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, top generals and other officials for alleged graft in a nation long gripped by crushing poverty. After a lengthy debate, 212 lawmakers from the powerful House of Representatives voted to…
Continue reading …Dancing with the Stars Season 12 Episode 1 Dancing with the Stars Season 12 Episode 1 Week 1 part 3/5 Dancing with the Stars Season 12 Episode 1 Derek Rates DWTS Competitors on GMA! | Pure Derek Hough Tomorrow – set your DVRs!! From ABC’s Daily News Release: TUESDAY, MARCH 22 – Reality star Bethenny Frankel; GMA Contributor Elisabeth Hasselbeck reports on. Why is Derek Hough Absent From Dancing With The Stars Season 12 … Dancing With The Stars Season 12: Where Is Derek Hough ? Derek Hough Amazing | Paula Dancing With The Stars Season 12: Where Is Derek Hough ? Tomorrow – set your DVRs!! From ABC’s Daily News Release: TUESDAY. Dancer Derek Hough has been spotted arriving at Cheryl Cole’s house in a taxi, The Dancing With the Stars … X Factor: Cheryl Cole meets Derek Hough's family at a birthday … Derek Hough is said to have finally brought his girlfriend Cheryl Cole to meet his mum Marriann Nelson. The X Factor judge is thought to have attended Nelson’s 54th birthday party in LA’s Soho House, where she also met Derek’s stepdad … Derek Hough | Breaking News Today It was announced by Access Hollywood that Derek will not be returning to the 12th season of Dancing with the Stars on May 25, 2010 Season 11: Celebrity partner. VictorGriffin5 says: Derek Hough 's stepdad: Cheryl Cole didn't get The X Factor job in US http://bit.ly/hLKAZQ
Continue reading …