Delena/Love hurts Haley Reinhart – House Of The Rising Sun (BEST PERFORMANCE?) – American Idol 5/4/11 Show Review American Idol 2011 Top 5 performance Commentary – Now and Then New Nazareth Home director finds her calling | People News and … Jean Bowman wаѕ looking fοr more purposeful work whеn ѕhе learned Nazareth Home іn East Chicago. Bowman, formerly οf Chicago, wаѕ working іn thе corporate planet, volunteering аѕ a mentor fοr Lydia Home Association аnd hаd become a … The Inside Scoop: Girls lacrosse | Nazareth and Fenwick meet in … All proceeds from admission to Saturday, May 7′s girls lacrosse match between Nazareth and Fenwick will be given to Gilda’s Club of Chicago, a breast cancer charity that helps family affected by the disease. The Nazareth team has … Tuesday Roundup: Nazareth defeats Fenwick in softball | People … Nazareth earned a 6-1 win over Fenwick іn East Suburban Catholic Conference action. Sara Maslar-Donar, Miranda Hiemer, Cat Guide аnd Shannon Cawley аll hаd two hits a piece аt thе plate. Guide аlѕο pitched 7 innings οn thе mound аnd … New Nazareth Home director finds her calling | Hot News Headlines … Jean Bowman wаѕ looking fοr more purposeful work whеn ѕhе learned Nazareth Home іn East Chicago. Bowman, formerly οf Chicago, wаѕ effective іn thе corporate world, volunteering аѕ a mentor fοr Lydia Home Friendship аnd hаd become a … The History Of The Role Of Nazareth – Just another WordPress site … The History Of The Role Of Nazareth While Volume One Jesus of Nazareth by Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) gives the reader the findings of years of prayer and scholarship concerning public life of Jesus Christ – from baptism to … TVenVivo123 says: American Idol 05/04/2011 – Jacob Lusk “Love Hurts” Top 5 http://pi.pe/-bvt6zu #American #Idol #Idols #JacobLusk #LoveHurts # Nazareth
Continue reading …Slate's media reporter Jack Shafer has a great column up calling on the White House to release the apparently-gruesome photos of Osama bin Laden after he was shot and killed by Navy SEALs on Sunday. Suppressing the photos, Shafer claims, “infantilizes the nation and gives the White House unwarranted news control.” Check out a longer excerpt below the break. In a world where every form of splatter, dismemberment, and slaughter has found a home on the Web—a place in which tens, perhaps hundreds, of millions have watched blood bubble out of Neda Salehi Agha Sotan's face and pool on the asphalt beneath her head—it seems nuts that President Barack Obama has decided not to release the photos of Osama Bin Laden's bullet-dented cranium… Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the chairman of the House Intelligence panel, opposes making the photos public for similar reasons, saying he doesn't want the images to “make the job of our troops serving in places like Iraq and Afghanistan any harder than it already is. The risks of release outweigh the benefits.” Obama and Rogers' idea that news should be calibrated by the government to ease the job of the U.S. military makes for a First Amendment loophole you could drive a motorized regiment through. If al-Qaida and its supporters are more irate with the United States this week than they were last week, it's because U.S. commandos killed Bin Laden. Obama should never have marked him for death if tending the “sensitivities” of al-Qaida and its allies was U.S. policy. It's hard to imagine that a death photo of Bin Laden would elevate al-Qaida and its supporters to some fury that his killing didn't. Or, as @knifework tweeted this afternoon, “Who hasn't shot someone in the face, fed their corpse to the sharks, and then fretted over how their followers would feel about the photo?” Thoughts on Shafer's argument? On the White House's decision generally?
Continue reading …Rolling coverage as voters go to the polls in elections for local government, the devolved administrations and the AV referendum 1.56pm: Time for a lunchtime summary , which is going to be short because it has been a quiet morning: • The former home secretary David Blunkett, who is opposed to AV, has said that the £250m figure cited by the the no camp as the cost of replacing first past the post with the alternative vote has been “made up” . (see 10.35am ). Blunkett said he believed it would “undoubtedly cost more”, but put the figure at £90m. • A Guardian/ICM poll predicts a resounding victory for first past the post in the referendum . The survey, conducted before the referendum, on whether to introduce the alternative vote for elections to the Commons predicts a 68% no vote with only 32% for yes. A YouGov poll for the Sun suggests 60% support for the no campaign, a 20-point lead over those in favour. But a poll by Metro shows a swing the other way, with those polled backing AV by 47% to 43%. (see 8.55am ) • The three main party leaders have all cast their votes (see 11.50am ), ( 9.59am ) and ( 9.37am ). On other fronts: • The foreign secretary, William Hague, has ordered the expulsion of a further two Libyan diplomats from the Libyan embassy in London “on the basis that their activities were contrary to the interests of the UK” . Foreign ministers are meeting in Rome to discuss plans to fund the Libyan rebels. The US has pledged to provide $25m for “non-lethal” aid. • On Syria, Alistair Burt, the foreign office minister, told Sky news sanctions against senior individuals in the Syrian regime were being considered, but added that “it’s still not too late for Syria to turn back” . Hillary Clinton has given her backing to EU sanctions against Syria. Matt Weaver is liveblogging all the latest on Libya, Syria and the Middle East unrest. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2011/may/05/libya-syria-middle-east-unrest-live The liveblog will resume shortly. 1.06pm: Dear Salopred – yes, London is the only region without elections other than the AV referendum (the London borough elections were last year and the mayoral and London assembly elections will be in 2012). The Lane ward poll in Peckham mentioned by supermole is a byelection for a councillor who recently stood down . 12.39pm: The Political and Constitutional Reform committee has called Nick Clegg to give evidence next Thursday on political and constitutional reform in the aftermath of AV referendum result. Clegg leads on constitutional reform in his role as deputy prime minister, and the session is part of the general scrutiny of the government’s reform programme. A press notice from the select committee, chaired by the Labour MP Graham Allen (who, incidentally, is in the yes camp for a switch to AV) states: The session is likely to focus in particular on the government’s immediate priorities, including the aftermath of the result of the referendum on the alternative vote and reform of the House of Lords, as well as the workings of coalition government. Should be interesting. 12.29pm: The FT’s Jim Pickard blogs that, contrary to some people’s expectations, a number of senior Lib Dems will be at the referendum count on Friday. They will include the former party leaders Lord Ashdown and Charles Kennedy, and the deputy leader, Simon Hughes. The UK results will be announced at the Excel Centre, in Docklands, London. Counting officers in 440 local voting areas will begin counting votes at 4pm on Friday. They will feed their local totals into one of 12 regional hubs across the UK, and the chief counting officer (Jenny Watson, from the electoral commission) will announce the regional totals as and when they come in before the final UK-wide result is declared. 11.53am: Our Ireland correspondent, Henry McDonald, has sent us this: Voters in Northern Ireland will have three ballot papers to fill in today as the province goes to the polls for elections to the assembly and local district councils. They will get a white paper for their choice of assembly candidates and a brown one for the council elections. On both of these, Northern Irish voters will vote by proportional representation with 1 as their first preference candidate, 2 their second preferred choice and so on. A third, light grey paper will be handed to each voter for the UK-wide AV referendum on electoral reform, where the vote will be cast with a simple X beside yes or no. The assembly poll will elect 108 new members to Stormont, while 582 council seats are being contested. More than 1,200,000 people are registered to vote in Northern Ireland. Polling stations opened at 7am and close at 10pm. Meanwhile, a senior police officer in the province said there will be an increased security presence due to the continued threat from republican dissidents. Deputy Chief Constable Judith Gillespie said this was to ensure there was no interference in the electoral process. 11.50am: David Cameron arrived in the rain (it’s more like drizzle) earlier to cast his referendum vote at the Methodist Central Hall in Westminster before strolling off towards Downing Street, according to PA. The media tried to ask him about the impact the result may have on the coalition, but they did so in vain. 11.32am: My colleague Jon Dennis noticed the warning on his polling card, which said: “You cannot be issued with a ballot paper after 10pm, even if you are at the polling station before then.” You may remember the outcry at last year’s general election when many people were disenfranchised because they had still been in queues at 10pm. The Electoral Commission says it unsuccessfully lobbied the government to put a clause in the parliamentary voting system and constituencies bill, now an Act, to ensure those still in a queue by 10pm could still vote if they had a ballot paper in their hand at the deadline point (for example, polling staff could hand out the ballot papers down the queue). So they issued guidance to chief returning officers to print the advice that Jon noticed on his polling card. The Electoral Commission has power of direction over the referendum, as opposed to the local elections. So to ensure everyone gets their say in the national poll, they instructed chief counting officers to have more polling stations (with 2,500 voters allocated to each), which should reduce the queues. (The Electoral Commission recommends this quota of voters for each station as good practice for other elections too). The cost of the referendum has been put at £81m, similar to the cost of a general election. The electorate for the referendum is around 46 million, according to the electoral watchdog. This is based on the latest available figures for registered and eligible voters in Britain (December 2010). 10.35am: Back to one of the central claims made by the no campaign about what having AV would cost. (see 9.37am ) David Blunkett, a vocal proponent of retaining first past the post, has claimed that the £250m figure cited by the no camp has been made up, according to the Times (paywall) Blunkett is quoted as saying: We are in the middle of an election campaign. People in elections use made-up figures. I have never used the £250m figure. It [AV] would undoubtedly cost more, but I have used an extra £90m. 10.27am: I seem to have confused readers in my opening post (I have amended it so that readers don’t have to get to this post to get clarity). But for those who have already read this far, I referred to STV for Scotland elections, which is actually used for the locals, not the devolved elections. Thanks, babytiger , for pointing it out. The devolved elections in Scotland are based on the mixed-member proportional representation system, ie first past the post system by constituency, with an additional member top-up by region. 9.59am: Nick Clegg voted in the Stannington area of Sheffield just after 9am. He wished the “best of luck” to Liberal Democrat candidates standing for town hall election, and urged people to come out and vote yes in the referendum to to make politics “a bit better and a bit fairer”. Here are some lines, courtesy of Press Association: Asked about the reaction on the doorstep, he said: ‘Good. Lots of people have got, obviously, questions and some people have got objections to what the government is having to do. ‘But I think most people – the vast majority of people – accept that we’re having to do a difficult job in difficult circumstances and that we’re trying do it as fairly and compassionately and responsibly as possible.’ Ed Miliband has already voted in both the Doncaster council election and the AV referendum via a postal vote. But he accompanied his fiancee, Justine Thornton, to a polling station in north London to cast her vote. The couple spent about 10 minutes at Parliament Hill school, not far from their London home, where they greeted supporters before leaving on foot. 9.37am: David Cameron has taken a slot in the Conservative-supporting Sun to focus on the AV referendum . Three-quarters of the page is devoted to a graphic with Cameron on the left, and a sombre looking Winston Churchill on the right, with “vote no to save our democracy” emblazoned above and a standfirst that reads: “Do your duty today.” Cameron urges everyone to come out and vote to avoid Britain being landed with AV: Today is a big day for our country. The AV referendum is on and our democracy is on the line. Unless enough people get out and vote today, Britain is going to end up tomorrow with a new voting system that is unfair, unclear and unpopular around the world. I’ll let the last word go to Winston Churchill. Many years ago, he described AV as ‘the stupidest, the least scientific and the most unreal’ voting system. Among the five “important reasons” cited by Cameron for voting no is the oft-repeated claim by the no camp that AV would cost a fortune, wasting money that the prime minister said could be “far better spent in our schools and hospitals”. The referendum, agreed by both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, is costing an estimated £80m, whatever happens. But the rest of the £247m quoted by the no camp is based on the predicted need to buy counting machines and/or pay the fees of vote counters with more work to do. The energy secretary, Chris Huhne, has threatened legal action over this argument, saying Australia – which uses the system – didn’t need to bring in new machines. The former Labour home secretary David Blunkett chips in his support for retaining first past the post. He lays out his arguments before concluding: I don’t think people should vote on personalities to defeat a particular party or a particular leader. I think people should vote because they want to retain one person one equal vote. Ed Miliband has urged voters not to use their referendum vote to give Nick Clegg “a kicking” because of his role in coalition government, but Blunkett’s comment makes one wonder whether the Conservatives are worried that those disgruntled with them will be voting yes for the same reasons. We shall soon see. 9.36am: Still in the Mirror, the paper has seized on a comment made by the Labour leader’s older brother, David, who has apparently described David Cameron as the “Basil Fawlty” of British politics. The Labour-supporting Mirror has obliged with a mock-up of Cameron with Manuel, Fawlty’s unappreciated waiter in the vintage British comedy. 9.21am: Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, tells the Daily Mirror that the local and devolved elections are voters’ opportunity to put “maximum pressure” on the government. His campaigning pitch has been to urge voters to send a message to the coalition about their anger at introducing policies for it has “no mandate”, such as NHS reorganisation. Miliband, who has been out campaigning in favour of the alternative vote, has tried to put the focus on significant Labour gains at the local elections. The Labour leader, who is on the same side of the fence as the Lib Dems on the referendum, has nevertheless seized on tensions within cabinet on the issue. What I’m interested in is what people want, and top of the list of voters’ concerns are the NHS, tuition fees and the cuts. And they will be asking why the Lib Dems are so hot under the collar about AV but don’t seem so hot under the collar about all these other issues. I think there is coalition land, a parallel universe where they are having this argument. And then there is the public, who are in a different place who are saying they don’t like these unseemly rows, it’s a bad way to run a government, and what we like even less is some of the policies they are pursuing, and that’s what Thursday is all about. Miliband, who took a question-and-answer session at Northfleet School for Girls in Kent yesterday as well as rallying his party, added: There’s a real sense this government doesn’t understand people and doesn’t understand people’s lives. They don’t understand the impacts they are having. They are profoundly out of touch with families struggling to get by and who are losing their tax credits, with the people losing their jobs, and who aren’t seeing the private sector jobs being created and youth unemployment with one in five people out of work. And what are they doing about it? Very little. 8.55am: Good morning. Have you been out to vote yet? (assuming you’re eligible and registered). Polls opened at 7am and close at 10pm, for those of you who didn’t opt for postal voting. Elections for the Scottish parliament, the Welsh assembly and the Northern Ireland assembly are being held, as are polls for 279 English councils. There are also local authority elections in Northern Ireland, a UK parliamentary byelection in Leicester South and mayoral elections in Leicester, Mansfield, Middlesbrough, Torbay and Bedford. The fact that so many of the British electorate have polls going on in their backyard was the reason the Liberal Democrats wanted the referendum on whether to switch the electoral system for electing MPs to Westminster from first past the post to the alternative vote to be held today. The only region without local polls is London, raising fears that turnout in the capital for the referendum could be as low as 15%. The BBC has produced a useful timeline of events once polls close . In sum, while we can expect a few local election results before midnight (Sunderland always prides itself on being first to declare, whether it’s a general or local election), the counting process for elections is going to stretch beyond Friday because not everyone is going to start counting tonight and also because some counts take more time than others. The final Northern Ireland assembly election results are not expected to be known until late Saturday afternoon. But we will know the result of the poll everyone’s been talking about – the national referendum – by around 9-10pm tomorrow. The count, everywhere, will begin at 4pm tomorrow, thought turnout should be known by lunchtime. The issue that has caused so much tension in the coalition government and seen the Labour party split between the yes and no camps looks likely to be resolved in favour of the status quo, according to a Guardian/ICM poll . The survey predicts a 68% no vote, with just 32% for yes. A YouGov poll for the Sun suggests 60% support for the no campaign, a 20-point lead over those in favour. But a poll by Metro shows a swing the other way, with those polled backing AV by 47% to 43%. Alternative vote AV referendum Scottish elections 2011 Welsh elections 2011 Welsh Assembly Government Welsh politics Scottish politics Local elections Local elections 2011 Northern Ireland elections 2011 Northern Irish politics Elections 2011 Hélène Mulholland guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) pleaded with lawmakers Wednesday to support his anti-abortion legislation. “Someday I truly believe future generations of Americans will look back on us, especially policymakers, and wonder how and why such a rich and seemingly enlightened society, so blessed and endowed with the capacity to protect vulnerable human life could have insisted and instead aggressively promoted death to children and the exploitation of their moms,” he said in a speech on the House floor. “They will note with deep sadness, some of our politicians, while they talked about human rights, never lifted a finger to protect the most persecuted minority in the world: the child in the womb.” “Back and vote for H.R. 3, ‘The No Taxpayer Money for Abortion Act,’” he concluded.
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: NBC Americans against cutting Medicare benefits The above graphic is from a poll result via ABC/WashPost that appeared on Meet The Press — and it’s one that Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP, Gang of Six and President Obama should really take to heart. ABC News/Washington Post poll The poll, conducted for ABC News by Langer Research Associates , finds that 65 percent of Americans oppose changing Medicare to a system in which the government would give seniors vouchers with which to buy private insurance. Opposition was essentially the same in a Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard School of Public Health survey when the idea came up 15 years ago. — The language may matter, in that even most Republicans, 56 percent, oppose Medicare vouchers, as do more than seven in 10 Democrats. And opposition soars to 84 percent of all Americans, including nearly three-quarters of Republicans, if government payments failed to meet the full cost of seniors’ insurance coverage. — But 78 percent in this survey oppose cuts in Medicare in order to address the federal debt (indeed 65 percent “strongly” oppose it); 69 percent oppose cuts in Medicaid, the insurance program for the poor (52 percent strongly); and fewer, but still 56 percent, oppose cutting military spending. Far more popular is taxing people perceived as being most able to pay: Seventy-two percent support achieving debt-reduction by raising taxes on people with household incomes more than $250,000 a year. That again counters the GOP position, and works for Obama, who last week ruled out another extension of tax cuts for better-off Americans The Beltway media keep hammering the public with cries of “shared sacrifice” and “adult conversations” and the need to cut our safety-net programs, but ordinary Americans do not agree. And a fine thing is beginning to happen. Rep. Paul Ryan is turning into The Solitary Man: A nd he is looking increasingly solitary. Last week, House Speaker John Boehner said he was “not wedded” to the Ryan budget that his caucus passed with near unanimity. On Sunday, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) described the Ryan budget that she voted for as an “aspirational document.” “What I’m saying with that vote is that we have to make decision, we’re not saying every single decision in that bill — that aspirational document — will be the final result. What we are saying is that we have a conviction,” Bachmann said on “Fox News Sunday.” When Michele Bachmann thinks Ryan’s plan is only “aspirational” , well, as a wingnut, you got problems.
Continue reading …Rupert Murdoch’s company reports 24% drop in third quarter profits, though Fox News had highest ever operating profit Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp is prepared to walk away from its controversial bid for BSkyB if the price keeps rising, its chief operating officer said. News Corp has bid 770p a share for BSkyB but the broadcaster’s shares are now 849p. Chase Carey, chief operating officer, told analysts that BSkyB’s share price was “clearly troubling” and was “unrealistic” given the challenges he sees ahead for the broadcaster as Murdoch’s company posted its quarterly results. Carey’s comments came as News Corp, owner of Twentieth Century Fox and the Times newspaper, reported a 24% slump in its third quarter profits as the success of Avatar proved tough to match. News Corp reported a fall in net income to $639m (£387m), or 24 cents a share, from $839m, or 32 cents, a year earlier. Fox News reported its highest ever operating profit, but filmed-entertainment sales slid 36% to $1.55bn as the quarter’s movies didn’t measure up to Avatar, the biggest box-office movie of all time. Film earnings fell by half to $248m. In a statement, News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch said the third quarter figures had faced “challenging comparisons” thanks to the enormous success of Avatar a year ago. “Looking beyond our film business, I am delighted with the continued and significant operational momentum of our channels businesses,” he said. Murdoch said he was particularly pleased with News Corp’s results in television, a segment that “viewed by the market just one year ago as a challenged business, more than quadrupled its earnings contributions over the prior year quarter on the strength of the national advertising market, increased retransmission consent revenues, and the popularity of our programming.” Television revenues rose 23% thanks to a strengthening ad market and revenues for Super Bowl XLV and lower costs. Revenue declines for News Corp’s UK and Australian newspapers and the costs of launching iPad newspaper The Daily helped drag down publishing returns that reported an operating income of $36m, a $207m decrease compared with the $243m reported a year ago. Most of that decline, $125m, was due to the litigation costs at News’ Integrated Marketing Services. The slump in figures comes as News Corp fights off problems in its UK newspaper and satellite TV businesses. The company’s attempts to take full control of BSkyB have been hampered by scandal as well as demands for a higher price from shareholders. Last month News Corp issued an “unreserved apology” to eight victims of the phone hacking scandal that has dogged the firm’s UK newspaper division. “Past behaviour at the News of the World in relation to voicemail interception is a matter of genuine regret,” the company said in a statement. “It is now apparent that our previous inquiries failed to uncover important evidence and we acknowledge our actions then were not sufficiently robust.” Before the statement News had maintained the scandal was the work of a rogue reporter. But the position became untenable as Scotland Yard’s investigation gathered pace. The News of the World’s chief reporter, Neville Thurlbeck and Ian Edmondson, who was sacked as associate editor (news) in January, have both been quizzed by the Yard. Lord Prescott, former deputy prime minister and a hacking victim, is suing the Metropolitan police over their initial handling of the phone tap inquiry. Prescott and Labour MP Tom Watson have used parliamentary privilege to claim the new inquiry has now spread to The Sunday Times and The Sun. Prescott has said Murdoch’s takeover of BSkyB should be delayed until the phone-hacking inquiry is over. News Corporation Media business BSkyB BSkyB United States Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The company has written a letter to Congress saying the data theft came as it was defending itself against cyber-attacks Investigators found a file implicating the “hacktivist” group Anonymous in the security breach that led to the theft of the personal details of more than 100 million online gamers, electronics company Sony has told the US Congress. In a letter to Congress , Sony said the data theft came at the same time it was defending itself against a cyber-attack from members of Anonymous. Forensic experts found a file on one of the hacked systems, titled Anonymous, which contained a phrase – “We are legion” – that is sometimes used by the hackers’ collective, said Sony chairman Kazuo Hirai in the letter to members of the House of Representatives. “What is becoming more and more evident is that Sony has been the victim of a very carefully planned, very professional, highly sophisticated criminal cyber-attack designed to steal personal and credit card information for illegal purposes,” he told the House commerce committee, who have launched an inquiry into the matter. Hirai, chairman of the board of directors of Sony Computer Entertainment America, said Anonymous began denial-of-service attacks, which take servers down by overwhelming them with internet traffic, after the company took action against a hacker in a federal court in San Francisco. “Just weeks before, several Sony companies had been the target of a large-scale, coordinated denial-of-service attack by the group called Anonymous,” said Hirai. “The attacks were coordinated against Sony as a protest against Sony for exercising its rights in a civil action in the United States district court in San Francisco against a hacker.” But he said the mass data theft was launched separately and Sony was not sure whether the two cyber-attacks were co-ordinated. The company also admitted that it discovered a breach in its PlayStation video game network on 20 April but did not report the matter to US authorities for two days and only informed consumers on 26 April. “Throughout the process, Sony Network Entertainment America was very concerned that announcing partial or tentative information to consumers could cause confusion and lead them to take unnecessary actions if the information was not fully corroborated by forensic evidence,” Hirai wrote. On Tuesday the company admitted the names, email addresses and phone numbers of 25 million Sony Online Entertainment (SOE) customers were stolen in the attack, which also hit 77 million PlayStation Network gamers. Debit card records of 10,700 customers in Austria, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain were compromised in the attack. “The Sony matter is under active investigation. It involves personnel from the FBI and the justice department who are looking into the matter,” US attorney general Eric Holder said. “It is something we are taking extremely seriously.” Anonymous was born out of the influential internet messageboard 4chan, a forum popular with hackers and gamers, in 2003. The group’s name is a tribute to 4chan’s early days, when any posting to its forums where no name was given was ascribed to Anonymous. It came to public prominence in December after members briefly brought down MasterCard, Visa and PayPal after those companies cut off financial services to WikiLeaks. PlayStation Games Sony US Congress United States US politics David Batty guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Did you know that Republicans loved the health-care mandate all the time they criticized it? I mean, I understand it’s a Republican concept, but Paul Ryan’s love for it apparently is twice as much as President Obama’s. Steve Benen: Now, any serious person listening to the hysteria has to realize Republicans don’t actually mean any of this. Indeed, many of those characterizing the individual mandate as the death of the American experiment were endorsing the idea as recently as 2009 — during the debate over reform. But in case anyone thought to take the faux-outrage seriously, Simon Lazarus raises an important observation : the highly-touted House GOP budget plan, as shaped by Paul Ryan, includes a health care mandate, too. In fact, it includes more than one. The Ryan budget would reshape Americans’ access to health insurance mainly through two provisions, both of which pressure people to purchase private health insurance to an extent and through mechanisms that are materially indistinguishable from the supposedly toxic Obamacare mandate. One of these Ryan budget proposals — as yet little noticed by pundits or politicians — is almost an exact copy of its equivalent in the Affordable Care Act. Under both provisions, the result is the same: People who choose to carry health insurance have a lower tax bill than they would if they chose not to. In terms of their respective potential impact on individuals’ bank accounts and tax liability, the manner in which they affect individuals’ financial incentives, and hence the constraining effect on individuals’ financial choices to either buy or forgo health insurance, the two “mandate” provisions are identical. (Indeed, in most cases, the financial difference for the individual taxpayer made by the Republican tax credit would be greater — i.e., more “coercive” — than the ACA tax penalty.) In addition to cloning the ACA’s framework for coverage of adults under 65, the Ryan budget would also apply a similar approach to Americans currently covered by Medicare. Beginning in 2021, former Medicare-eligibles would receive a voucher they can apply to the purchase of private insurance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the vouchers would be worth approximately $6,000 for recipients age 65, and would be greater for older recipients, averaging $11,000 across the entire Medicare population. Of course, Americans would be required to continue to pay their annual Medicare tax throughout their working lives. Hence, the Republicans’ proposal to replace Medicare with partially subsidized private insurance also operates to “compel” people to pay for private health insurance policies. Moreover, this mandate is not even a pay-or-play option; Medicare taxes are mandatory, whether workers want to buy eligibility for old-age vouchers or not. Nearly every member of the House Republican caucus voted for this budget plan, and said nary a word about the freedom-crushing provision included by Paul Ryan. Howie Klein finds that Republican voters aren’t thrilled with Ryan’s budget proposal either: Even their own right-wing polling firm , that normally tells them whatever they want to hear, had bad news about Paul Ryan’s ultra-reactionary budget from hell, what he calls his “cause.” A plurality of voters still have no opinion about Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s long-term budget-cutting plan, but opposition has increased over the past several weeks. By a near two-to-one margin, they don’t like his proposal for tackling spiraling Medicare costs. And Ryan’s plan is also linked to how badly Wisconsin voters are feeling about the GOP: Zerban himself seemed buoyed by the results in La Crosse. When we contacted him this morning he also saw the Ryan effect setting in on Wisconsin Republicans: “We are seeing an incredible amount of opposition to the Ryan budget plan and Gov. Walker’s unprecedented power grab. Representative-elect Steve Doyle’s election last night confirms that. People all across Wisconsin are seeing the true colors of the GOP, and rejecting their mantra of reducing taxes for the wealthiest and balancing the budget on the backs of the hard working families of Wisconsin. The more people hear and look at Ryan’s un-bold plan to destroy prosperity, the more they hate it and the more it infects the entire GOP. Remember, they all voted for it.
Continue reading …Did you know that Republicans loved the health-care mandate all the time they criticized it? I mean, I understand it’s a Republican concept, but Paul Ryan’s love for it apparently is twice as much as President Obama’s. Steve Benen: Now, any serious person listening to the hysteria has to realize Republicans don’t actually mean any of this. Indeed, many of those characterizing the individual mandate as the death of the American experiment were endorsing the idea as recently as 2009 — during the debate over reform. But in case anyone thought to take the faux-outrage seriously, Simon Lazarus raises an important observation : the highly-touted House GOP budget plan, as shaped by Paul Ryan, includes a health care mandate, too. In fact, it includes more than one. The Ryan budget would reshape Americans’ access to health insurance mainly through two provisions, both of which pressure people to purchase private health insurance to an extent and through mechanisms that are materially indistinguishable from the supposedly toxic Obamacare mandate. One of these Ryan budget proposals — as yet little noticed by pundits or politicians — is almost an exact copy of its equivalent in the Affordable Care Act. Under both provisions, the result is the same: People who choose to carry health insurance have a lower tax bill than they would if they chose not to. In terms of their respective potential impact on individuals’ bank accounts and tax liability, the manner in which they affect individuals’ financial incentives, and hence the constraining effect on individuals’ financial choices to either buy or forgo health insurance, the two “mandate” provisions are identical. (Indeed, in most cases, the financial difference for the individual taxpayer made by the Republican tax credit would be greater — i.e., more “coercive” — than the ACA tax penalty.) In addition to cloning the ACA’s framework for coverage of adults under 65, the Ryan budget would also apply a similar approach to Americans currently covered by Medicare. Beginning in 2021, former Medicare-eligibles would receive a voucher they can apply to the purchase of private insurance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the vouchers would be worth approximately $6,000 for recipients age 65, and would be greater for older recipients, averaging $11,000 across the entire Medicare population. Of course, Americans would be required to continue to pay their annual Medicare tax throughout their working lives. Hence, the Republicans’ proposal to replace Medicare with partially subsidized private insurance also operates to “compel” people to pay for private health insurance policies. Moreover, this mandate is not even a pay-or-play option; Medicare taxes are mandatory, whether workers want to buy eligibility for old-age vouchers or not. Nearly every member of the House Republican caucus voted for this budget plan, and said nary a word about the freedom-crushing provision included by Paul Ryan. Howie Klein finds that Republican voters aren’t thrilled with Ryan’s budget proposal either: Even their own right-wing polling firm , that normally tells them whatever they want to hear, had bad news about Paul Ryan’s ultra-reactionary budget from hell, what he calls his “cause.” A plurality of voters still have no opinion about Republican Congressman Paul Ryan’s long-term budget-cutting plan, but opposition has increased over the past several weeks. By a near two-to-one margin, they don’t like his proposal for tackling spiraling Medicare costs. And Ryan’s plan is also linked to how badly Wisconsin voters are feeling about the GOP: Zerban himself seemed buoyed by the results in La Crosse. When we contacted him this morning he also saw the Ryan effect setting in on Wisconsin Republicans: “We are seeing an incredible amount of opposition to the Ryan budget plan and Gov. Walker’s unprecedented power grab. Representative-elect Steve Doyle’s election last night confirms that. People all across Wisconsin are seeing the true colors of the GOP, and rejecting their mantra of reducing taxes for the wealthiest and balancing the budget on the backs of the hard working families of Wisconsin. The more people hear and look at Ryan’s un-bold plan to destroy prosperity, the more they hate it and the more it infects the entire GOP. Remember, they all voted for it.
Continue reading …