Home » Posts tagged with » house (Page 113)
The Republican Job Creators Myth

enlarge Credit: Eric Cantor, Congressional Joint Economic Committee On Thursday, John Boehner and the House Republican leadership team unveiled their ” Plan for America’s Job Creators .” As he repeatedly made clear before the Economic Club of New York and again on CBS Face the Nation , Boehner’s “job creators” are the top two percent of income earners whose Bush tax cuts President Obama has proposed ending. And that presents a bit of problem for the Republicans. After all, George W. Bush’s tax breaks for the wealthy sadly coincided with the worst period of job creation of any president since Herbert Hoover. Which means the GOP plan for America’s job creators is just another tax cut windfall for the gilded class . Earlier this month, Speaker Boehner warned that “The mere threat of tax hikes causes uncertainty for job creators — uncertainty that results in less risk-taking and fewer jobs.” As he told Harry Smith of CBS two weeks ago: “The top one percent of wage earners in the United States…pay forty percent of the income taxes…The people he’s {President Obama] is talking about taxing are the very people that we expect to reinvest in our economy.” If so, those expectations were sadly unmet under George W. Bush. After all, the last time the top tax rate was 39.6% during the Clinton administration, the United States enjoyed rising incomes, 23 million new jobs and budget surpluses. Under Bush? Not so much. On January 9, 2009, the Republican-friendly Wall Street Journal summed it up with an article titled simply, ” Bush on Jobs: the Worst Track Record on Record .” (The Journal’s interactive table quantifies his staggering failure relative to every post-World War II president.) The dismal 3 million jobs created under President Bush didn’t merely pale in comparison to the 23 million produced during Bill Clinton’s tenure. In September 2009, the Congressional Joint Economic Committee charted Bush’s job creation disaster (above), the worst since Hoover. That dismal performance prompted David Leonhardt of the New York Times to ask last fall, “Why should we believe that extending the Bush tax cuts will provide a big lift to growth?” His answer was unambiguous: Those tax cuts passed in 2001 amid big promises about what they would do for the economy. What followed? The decade with the slowest average annual growth since World War II. Amazingly, that statement is true even if you forget about the Great Recession and simply look at 2001-7… Is there good evidence the tax cuts persuaded more people to join the work force (because they would be able to keep more of their income)? Not really. The labor-force participation rate fell in the years after 2001 and has never again approached its record in the year 2000. Is there evidence that the tax cuts led to a lot of entrepreneurship and innovation? Again, no. The rate at which start-up businesses created jobs fell during the past decade. It’s no wonder Leonhardt followed his first question with another. “I mean this as a serious question, not a rhetorical one,” he asked, “Given this history, why should we believe that the Bush tax cuts were pro-growth?” Or as Mark Shields asked and answered in April: “Do tax cuts help ‘job creators’ or ‘robber barons’?” Just days after the Washington Post documented that George W. Bush presided over the worst eight-year economic performance in the modern American presidency, the New York Times in January 2009 featured an analysis comparing presidential performance going back to Eisenhower. As the Times showed, George W. Bush, the first MBA president, was a historic failure when it came to expanding GDP, producing jobs and even fueling stock market growth. Apparently, America’s job creators can create a lot more jobs when their taxes are higher – even much higher – than they are today. The epic failures of the Bush tax cuts for America’s supposed job creators hardly end there. The U.S. poverty rate began rising in 2005 , well before the onset of the December 2007 Bush recession. As David Cay Johnston document, average household income fell after the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, dropping to about $58,500 in 2008 from $61,500 in 2000. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) found that the Bush tax cuts accounted for almost half of the mushrooming deficits during his tenure , and, if made permanent, over the next 10 years would contribute more to the U.S. budget deficit than the Obama stimulus, the TARP program, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and revenue lost to the recession put together . As the data show, the Bush tax cuts provided a massive payday for the wealthy , helping fuel record income inequality . Despite that record failure, House Republicans want to give the job creators who don’t create jobs another jaw-dropping tax cut. As Ezra Klein , Paul Krugman and Steve Benen among others noted, the “Plan for America’s Job Creators” is simply a repackaging of years of previous proposals and GOP bromides. (As Klein pointed out, the 10 page document “looks like the staffer in charge forgot the assignment was due on Thursday rather than Friday, and so cranked the font up to 24 and began dumping clip art to pad out the plan.”) At the center of it is the same plan from the Ryan House budget passed in April to cut the top individual and corporate tax rates to 25%. The price tag for the Republican proposal is a jaw-dropping $4.2 trillion. And as Matthew Yglesias explained, earlier analyses of similar proposals in Ryan’s Roadmap reveal that working Americans would have to pick up the tab left unpaid by upper-income households: This is an important element of Ryan’s original “roadmap” plan that’s never gotten the attention it deserves. But according to a Center for Tax Justice analysis (PDF), even though Ryan features large aggregate tax cuts, ninety percent of Americans would actually pay higher taxes under his plan. In other words, it wasn’t just cuts in middle class benefits in order to cut taxes on the rich. It was cuts in middle class benefits and middle class tax hikes in order to cut taxes on the rich. It’ll be interesting to see if the House Republicans formally introduce such a plan and if so how many people will vote for it. If this all sounds hauntingly familiar, it should. When it comes to using the tax code to line the pockets of the wealthiest people in America, House Republicans simply want the next decade to look like the last one. That is, gargantuan tax cuts for America’s so-called “job creators”; no jobs for Americans. (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …
Ratko Mladic Arrested: Inside The Raid That Nabbed The Suspected War Criminal

BELGRADE, Serbia — The old man, hobbled by pain, couldn’t coax himself to sleep. He got out of bed just before dawn, pulled on a blue baseball cap and headed for a walk in the garden. Maybe some fresh air would clear his head. At the same time, four jeeps carrying about 20 masked men in black fatigues rolled quietly into the remote northern Serbian village of Lazarevo, hoping to surprise a quarry that had eluded them for 16 years. They pulled up to four houses simultaneously – all owned by relatives of one of the world’s most wanted men. Four of the men jumped over a fence and burst into one of the houses as the frail man moved toward the door. They grabbed him and pushed him roughly to the floor. “Identify yourself!” one shouted. The old man managed a whisper: “I’m Ratko Mladic.” An excruciating manhunt had ended quietly as the sun rose over the Serbian fields. The account, provided to The Associated Press by three Serbian police officials on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, was the most detailed to date of the operation that captured the man charged with orchestrating atrocities in the Bosnian war, including Europe’s worst massacre since World War II. Mladic, the officials said, moved to the largely Bosnian Serb village of Lazarevo about two years ago, figuring he would be safe with his relatives. Earlier in his life as a fugitive he was brazen enough to be seen at fancy restaurants and drinking clubs in Belgrade, Serbia’s capital, but here he lived an anonymous, low-key lifestyle. Age and declining health helped make him inconspicuous. The slow, unsteady 69-year-old who appeared in court Friday bore little resemblance to the robust, uniformed figure strutting in front of the cameras during the Bosnian war. Police said they had no tip that Mladic was hiding out in Lazarevo, and no specific information about the house where he was found, other than it was owned by a relative. The officers, who have been searching for Mladic across Serbia for years, had never been to Lazarevo. They came at 5 a.m. Thursday, when most of the village’s 2,000 residents were still asleep. The streets were virtually empty when the jeeps rolled in. Police said Mladic was awake in the yellow brick house he rarely left because his body ached from a variety of ailments. He was headed for a walk when the masked officers surprised him. “Good work,” Mladic told them, according to Serbian police chief Ivica Dacic. “You found the one you were looking for.” The three police officials said Mladic was carrying two loaded pistols. “Don’t do something funny,” an officer told him, and Mladic dutifully handed over the weapons. The officers pushed Mladic into one of the 4x4s and raced away, the jeep’s heavy tires sending fine dust into the air. He was taken to Belgrade. He could be extradited as early as Monday to The Hague in the Netherlands, where the U.N. war crimes tribunal has been waiting for him since 1995. Mladic was the top commander of the Bosnian Serb army during Bosnia’s 1992-95 war, which left more than 100,000 people dead and drove another 1.8 million from their homes. He is charged with international war crimes in a campaign to purge the region of non-Serbs that included the slaughter of 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica. Though Mladic had evaded capture since 1995, Dacic said the ex-general did not have a large support network. “Mladic lived alone with his relatives, without any financial means,” the chief told reporters Friday. “The stories that he had a major ring of security and many helpers turned out not to be true.” A $10 million (7 million euro) reward had been offered for Mladic’s arrest, but Serbian officials said no one will pick it up because police were not acting on a tip when they arrested him. Mladic was taken to court on Thursday and Friday, when a judge ruled he was fit enough to be extradited. His attorney is appealing, saying he’s too ill to leave Serbia. The Serbian health ministry said in a statement that a team of prison doctors described Mladic’s health as stable following checkups. It also said Health Minister Zoran Stankovic, a former friend of Mladic’s, visited him in his cell Friday. Mladic is taking a lot of medicine, but “responds very rationally to everything that is going on,” deputy war crimes prosecutor Bruno Vekaric said. A tribunal spokeswoman said from The Hague that it is capable of dealing with any health problems. Mladic addressed people in court by name and talked a lot, a judicial official told the AP on condition of anonymity. The official said Mladic also refused to take off his blue ball cap. “His body is weak, but his eyes are the blue-steel eyes of a young man,” the official said. Mladic asked for fresh strawberries to be brought to his cell, along with novels by Russian master Leo Tolstoy and a television set, the judicial official said. The strawberries were provided; it wasn’t immediately clear if he had also been given the books and the TV. And the official said Mladic was denied his request to visit the Belgrade grave of his daughter Ana, who killed herself in 1994 with her father’s favorite pistol. Mladic is seeking at least one more thing, Vekaric said: his military pension, which has been frozen because of his indictment. ___ Associated Press writer Jovana Gec contributed to this report.

Continue reading …

Cranberry

No Comment
Cranberry

Top 5 Body Butters! Cranberry bugz play Cranberry bugz play flavainyourear says: @JeromeGrant had it with ice me and cranberry don't mix 'like two dicks and no bitch' #biggie

Continue reading …

So Grover Norquist wrote a letter to one of Pennsylvania’s Republican state senators: When is a fee a tax? When Grover Norquist says so. The Inquirer reported last week that anti-tax guru Norquist was the wizard behind the Oz-like fiscal contortions of the GOP-controlled state legislature, which has refused to consider raising revenue of any kind in the face of a massive debt. It was Norquist and his D.C.-based group, Americans for Tax Reform, who advanced the “no tax” pledge signed by hundreds of elected officials, including Gov. Corbett and 34 members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly. The state House – in keeping with Corbett’s “no way, no how” to new taxes – has buried any proposals to place a levy on Marcellus Shale natural gas extraction. But this month Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati (R., Jefferson) bit the bullet and offered up a shale gas “impact fee” with proceeds funneled to affected areas. Over in the governor’s office, Corbett remains unwavering in his campaign-era hard line over tax increases, but in recent months has shown some hint of openness – if not support – of the prospect of an “impact fee. ” Until now. Because Grover – arbiter of all things fiscal throughout the land – said so. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette today reports that Norquist sent a letter to Sen. Mary Jo White (R., Venango) whose committee would have to consider the shale fee pronouncing it, in fact, a tax. “Make no mistake, this proposal is a tax increase based on any honest and objective analysis,” Norquist wrote. “As such, a vote in favor of Senate Bill 1100 also represents a violation of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a commitment which Gov. Corbett and 34 members of the legislature have made to their constituents to impose any and all efforts to raise taxes.” I wonder who voted for this guy. Oh, that’s right: NOBODY. He’s just the guy with all the corporate cash who can target you and take you down. So the politicians will do anything, no matter how immoral or unpopular, if Grover tells them to do it. But let’s look at the logical consequences of Grover’s famous strong-arm tactics. Because of Grover Norquist, the man who’s vowed to drown government in a bathtub, the lives of disabled Pennsylvanians are at risk. Via RIck Smith: “If disabled people are going to die without services, we’re going to do it publicly.” Those are the words of disabled activity Cassie Holdworth-James from Philadelphia who spoke to me today during ADAPT’s occupation of our capital. Watch her video. Yesterday 30 disabled citizens rolled into their capitol in Harrisburg, PA asking to meet with their governor Tom Corbett. They were ignored. In fact, they were worse than ignored. The Corbett squad saw fit to put 25 uniformed and undercover security people standing all around these citizens whose only crime was to ask their governor hear their concerns. Check out the pictures and video of them here. A wheelchair-bound spokeswoman said she believed the governor and his Republican allies’ budget is going to cost people like her their lives, and, that she was not going to die in private. She was going to die in public for everyone to see what the budget cuts did . These 30 brave activist have started down a path that we must all follow in order to protect the most vulnerable and needy in our society. Budgets have been called a moral document that shows ones priorities. This budget shows the Republican priorities, but it is not moral .For those of you outside Pennsylvania, we need to learn from these people who already are up against huge odds.

Continue reading …
Bachmann’s Iowa Debacle

Click here to view this media I heard it was bad. I didn’t know it was this frigging bad. Video by ABC5, Des Moines . Story by The Iowa Republican (from the website, “news for Republicans by Republicans”). “ This is a disaster ,” said one prominent Polk County Republican. An elected official called it “ an embarrassment ”. The embarrassing disaster was the result of Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann’s last minute cancellation of her appearance at the Polk County GOP’s Robb Kelley Dinner. Bachmann’s absence turned what should have been a very successful fundraiser into a black eye for herself, her presidential aspirations and the county party. Over 300 Republicans paid $75 per ticket to meet and listen to Bachmann. Media from around the country, and even as far away as Norway, descended on Des Moines to cover the event. Extra security was arranged. Speculation rose that she might announce a bid for the presidency at the event. Bachmann squashed that rumor the day before. Then, two hours before the event was scheduled to start, she informed Polk County GOP officials she would not be able to attend. The scheduling conflict arose because of a House vote on extending the Patriot Act. Backup plans were made for her to use a private jet. In the end, nothing worked and Bachmann was unable to make it. Instead, she appeared on choppy and blurry Skype-style video. Local Republicans were extremely displeased. “It’s awful,” said activist Becky Irvin. “ She just shot herself in the foot. She dissed Iowa. You don’t diss Iowa .” The Patriot Act extensions passed easily, 250-153. Bachmann’s presence was not vital. However, some attendees gave her the benefit of the doubt. “I don’t like it, but I understand,” said John Kline. A sucky video didn’t help matters. The Minnesota congresswoman’s speech-by-video only made matters worse. Bachmann made the mistake of name-dropping Donald Trump during her talk. “Donald Trump was right, we are getting our tail kicked by China,” she said. Last week, Trump cancelled his scheduled appearance at a Republican Party of Iowa fundraiser. Bachmann was clearly ignorant or tone deaf to that controversy. She apparently was not ignorant of the fact that people were bored by watching her speak on a poor quality video, because Bachmann apologized for being “longwinded”. She then opened it up for questions, but by that point, a significant portion of the crowd had seen enough. Several dozen attendees got up and left. Bachmann then answered two questions, taking several minutes responding to each. “I found myself zoning out and didn’t really follow it,” said one Polk County central committee member and event volunteer. Kevin Hall delivers the final coup de grâce : comparing Bachmann’s fundraiser disaster to the stink left by Newt Gingrich’s roll-out. Nothing about Michelle Bachmann seemed presidential Thursday night. Many people thought Newt Gingrich sunk his campaign in the week after his presidential announcement. Bachmann might have dealt a fatal blow to her campaign before she announces.

Continue reading …
Margo Dydek Dead: Former WNBA Player Dies At 37

BRISBANE, Australia — Former WNBA player Margo Dydek has died after suffering a heart attack a week ago and being placed in a medically induced coma. She was 37. Cathy Roberts, the operations manager for the Northside Wizards in the Queensland Basketball League, where Dydek was head coach, told The Associated Press that Dydek died early Friday. The Poland-born Dydek, who was pregnant with her third child, suffered the heart attack on May 19 and collapsed at her home in Brisbane. Roberts said that Dydek was at an early stage in her pregnancy and that her unborn child had also died. Dydek was the No. 1 pick in the 1998 WNBA draft by the Utah Starzz. She also played for San Antonio, Connecticut and Los Angeles. The 7-foot-2 Dydek was once said to be the tallest active professional female basketball player in the world. She held the record for most blocks in a WNBA career, with 877 in 323 games, and led the league in blocks nine times, from 1998 to 2003 and again from 2005-07. On August 27, 2008, Dydek signed with the Los Angeles Sparks following time away from basketball due to the birth of her first son in April 2008. An entry on Dydek’s Facebook page says she was born on April 28, 1974, in Warsaw, Poland, to a 6-foot-7 father and a 6-3 mother. She had two sisters, and her elder sister Kashka used to play for the Colorado Explosion of the now defunct ABL, and in Poland. Tina Thompson, a former teammate of Dydek’s on the Sparks, said on the WNBA’s Twitter feed: “My condolences to the family of Margo Dydek, may she rest in peace!” The Brisbane-based Wizards posted a statement on their website Friday. “Always in our hearts – Margo,” it said. “With great sadness we acknowledge the passing of … Margo Dydek. Margo suffered a heart attack just over a week ago and passed away Friday 27th May, peacefully and surrounded by her family. “You were a much-loved member of our community and we will miss you greatly. Our hearts go out to your family, David and your beautiful boys xx.” She is survived by her husband, David, and two sons, David, 3, and Alex, seven months.

Continue reading …
Patriot Act Extension Signed By Obama

JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press WASHINGTON — Minutes before a midnight deadline, President Barack Obama signed into law a four-year extension of post-Sept. 11 powers to search records and conduct roving wiretaps in pursuit of terrorists. “It’s an important tool for us to continue dealing with an ongoing terrorist threat,” Obama said Friday after a meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy. With Obama in France, the White House said the president used an autopen machine that holds a pen and signs his actual signature. It is only used with proper authorization of the president. Congress sent the bill to the president with only hours to go on Thursday before the provisions expired at midnight. Votes taken in rapid succession in the Senate and House came after lawmakers rejected attempts to temper the law enforcement powers to ensure that individual liberties are not abused. The Senate voted 72-23 for the legislation to renew three terrorism-fighting authorities. The House passed the measure 250-153 on an evening vote. A short-term expiration would not have interrupted ongoing operations but would have barred the government from seeking warrants for new investigations. Congress bumped up against the deadline mainly because of the stubborn resistance from a single senator, Republican freshman Rand Paul of Kentucky, who saw the terrorist-hunting powers as an abuse of privacy rights. Paul held up the final vote for several days while he demanded a chance to change the bill to diminish the government’s ability to monitor individual actions. The measure would add four years to the legal life of roving wiretaps, authorized for a person rather than a communications line or device; court-ordered searches of business records; and surveillance of non-American “lone wolf” suspects without confirmed ties to terrorist groups. The roving wiretaps and access to business records are small parts of the USA Patriot Act enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. But unlike most of the act, which is permanent law, those provisions must be renewed periodically because of concerns that they could be used to violate privacy rights. The same applies to the “lone wolf” provision, which was part of a 2004 intelligence law. Paul argued that in the rush to meet the terrorist threat in 2001 Congress enacted a Patriot Act that tramples on individual liberties. He had some backing from liberal Democrats and civil liberties groups who have long contended the law gives the government authority to spy on innocent citizens. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said he voted for the act in 2001 “while ground zero was still burning.” But “I soon realized it gave too much power to government without enough judicial and congressional oversight.” Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said the provision on collecting business records can expose law-abiding citizens to government scrutiny. “If we cannot limit investigations to terrorism or other nefarious activities, where do they end?” he asked. “The Patriot Act has been used improperly again and again by law enforcement to invade Americans’ privacy and violate their constitutional rights,” said Laura W. Murphy, director of the ACLU Washington legislative office. Still, coming just a month after intelligence and military forces tracked down and killed Osama bin Laden, there was little appetite for tampering with the terrorism-fighting tools. These tools, said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, “have kept us safe for nearly a decade and Americans today should be relieved and reassured to know that these programs will continue.” Intelligence officials have denied improper use of surveillance tools, and this week both FBI Director Robert Mueller and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper sent letters to congressional leaders warning of serious national security consequences if the provisions were allowed to lapse. The Obama administration says that without the three authorities the FBI might not be able to obtain information on terrorist plotting inside the U.S. and that a terrorist who communicates using different cell phones and email accounts could escape timely surveillance. “When the clock strikes midnight tomorrow, we would be giving terrorists the opportunity to plot attacks against our country, undetected,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday. In unusually personal criticism of a fellow senator, he warned that Paul, by blocking swift passage of the bill, “is threatening to take away the best tools we have for stopping them.” The nation itself is divided over the Patriot Act, as reflected in a Pew Research Center poll last February, before the killing of bin Laden, that found that 34 percent felt the law “goes too far and poses a threat to civil liberties. Some 42 percent considered it “a necessary tool that helps the government find terrorists.” That was a slight turnaround from 2004 when 39 percent thought it went too far and 33 percent said it was necessary. Paul, after complaining that Reid’s remarks were “personally insulting,” asked whether the nation “should have some rules that say before they come into your house, before they go into your banking records, that a judge should be asked for permission, that there should be judicial review? Do we want a lawless land?” Paul agreed to let the bill go forward after he was given a vote on two amendments to rein in government surveillance powers. Both were soundly defeated. The more controversial, an amendment that would have restricted powers to obtain gun records in terrorist investigations, was defeated 85-10 after lawmakers received a letter from the National Rifle Association stating that it was not taking a position on the measure. According to a senior Justice Department national security official testifying to Congress last March, the government has sought roving wiretap authority in about 20 cases a year between 2001 and 2010 and has sought warrants for business records less than 40 times a year, on average. The government has yet to use the lone wolf authority. But the ACLU also points out that court approvals for business record access jumped from 21 in 2009 to 96 last year, and the organization contends the Patriot Act has blurred the line between investigations of actual terrorists and those not suspected of doing anything wrong. Two Democratic critics of the Patriot Act, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Udall of Colorado, on Thursday extracted a promise from Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that she would hold hearings with intelligence and law enforcement officials on how the law is being carried out. Wyden says that while there are numerous interpretations of how the Patriot Act works, the official government interpretation of the law remains classified. “A significant gap has developed now between what the public thinks the law says and what the government secretly claims it says,” Wyden said. Former ACLU head discusses The Patriot Act ___ Associated Press writers Laurie Kellman and Pete Yost contributed to this report.

Continue reading …
The Jobs Gap: The Deficit That Matters Most

enlarge Credit: Washington Post While all eyes remain fixed on the Republican debt ceiling hostage drama in Washington, the deficit that really matters has all but disappeared from the American political debate. Even as Vice President Biden confidently predicted his bipartisan group of budget negotiators would slash $1 trillion in spending , forecasters are once again downgrading their estimates for second quarter economic growth . All of which means that with 9% unemployment and record-low labor force participation, the jobs deficit should be job number one for both political parties . With first-time jobless claims edging back up and first quarter growth lowered to 1.8% , Macroeconomic Advisors dropping their Q2 GDP growth forecast from 3.2% to 2.8%. That prompted Paul Krugman was quick to join Brad Delong in sounding the alarm. It’s “time to panic,” Delong warned, adding that real second quarter GDP growth “looks slow enough to put no upward pressure at all on the employment-to-population ratio.” Krugman, who ominously cautioned last year about “Third Depression” in the form of prolonged economic weakness, lamented that: As Brad says, these estimates now suggest that we have now gone through a year and a half of “recovery” that has failed to make any progress toward closing the gap between what the economy should be producing and what it’s actually producing. That output gap, the Washington Post showed using a helpful interactive graphic last fall, explains “why it doesn’t feel like a recovery.” While U.S. GDP has now surpassed its pre-Bush recession level , the $900 billion divide between the amount the United States can produce and what it is actually producing “explains why we feel so miserable more than a year into what is technically classified as an economic recovery.” Worse still, as the Post charted at the time, at current rates of population and productivity growth, the economy would have to expand at an average of 3% a year to reduce unemployment to 5% by 2020 . Right now, that’s just not happening. While the recession officially ended in 2009, the current recovery is proceeding at a much more sluggish rate than usual. The result, as the thoroughly depressing chart which follows from the St. Louis Fed shows, is persistent joblessness hovering around 9%. Just as frightening, employment as percentage of U.S. population has nose-dived. (As the New York Times noted earlier this month, “men currently have their lowest labor force participation rate since the Labor Department began keeping track since 1948.” For months, House Speaker John Boehner has insisted that “getting Americans back to work has been and will continue to be the number-one priority for our new majority.” Of course, that promise wasn’t just belied by Boehner’s choices instead to fast-track draconian new anti-abortion legislation or his April declaration that repealing the Obama health care law was “our No. 1 priority.” As the data show, the GOP has successfully transformed Americans’ focus onto another issue altogether: the budget deficit. “Reagan,” Vice President Dick Cheney famously declared in 2002, “proved deficits don’t matter.” Unless, that is, a Democrat is in the White House . After all, while Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and George W. Bush doubled it again , each Republican was rewarded with a second term in office. But as the Gallup polling data show, concern over the federal deficit hasn’t been this high since Democratic budget balancer Bill Clinton was in office. All of which suggest the Republicans’ born-again disdain for deficits ranks among the greatest – and most successful – political double-standards in recent memory. The triumph of the GOP messaging machine is reflected in an April Washington Post/Pew Research poll. In just the four months since the Republican majority took control of the House, the percentage of Americans believing the budget deficit is a major problem which must be addressed now catapulted from 70% to 81%. But even more revealing is an April Gallup survey which showed the deficit (17%) rivaling the unemployment (19%) and the overall state of the economy (26%). And as it turns out, those cyclical swings in budget angst reflect the complete victory of the conservative deficit narrative. The Republicans’ misdirection on debt and deficits is reflecting in myriad other ways as well. Despite having voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush (as well as for the Bush tax cuts the unfunded wars in Iraq and Afghanistan responsible for most of the nation’s debt over the next decade), GOP leaders have bamboozled Americans by a 48% to 35% margin that raising the debt limit would be worse than the cataclysm of a U.S. default . And as the National Journal revealed last week, the shift from jobs to deficits in American political discourse is reflected in media coverage as well: Major U.S. newspapers have increasingly shifted their attention away from coverage of unemployment in recent months while greatly intensifying their focus on the deficit, a National Journal analysis shows. The analysis — based on a measure of how often the words “unemployment” and “deficit” appear in major publications — portrays a dramatically shifting landscape of coverage over the past two years, as the debate over how to fix the federal deficit has risen to prominence and the question of how to handle still-high unemployment has faded from the media’s consciousness… Mentions of unemployment have been dwindling since they spiked to 154 in the month ending August 15, 2010; over the month ending Sunday, there were 63. Deficit mentions, meanwhile, surged up to 261 in the month ending December 15, 2010, when the leaders of President Obama’s deficit commission released their final report. Mentions of the deficit remained higher after the commission’s work wrapped up and as House Republicans and then the White House unveiled dueling proposals. In the month ending Sunday, there were 201 mentions. Writing in the Washington Post last month, Eugene Robinson fretted over “the word most politicians ignore: Jobs.” What is it, he asked, “about the word ‘jobs’ that our nation’s leaders fail to understand?” Sadly, Republicans won’t do anything about jobs and have made sure that Democrats can’t. Despite GOP claims to the contrary, the Obama stimulus worked. (By last June, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the Obama stimulus program had saved or created up to 3.3 million jobs, lowered the unemployment rate by as much as 1.8% and boosted GDP by 4.5%. For his part, former John McCain adviser Mark Zandi in August concluded that the combined federal interventions beginning in the fall of 2008 prevented the Great Recession from becoming Depression 2.0. ) But as Paul Krugman predicted before and Ezra Klein explained after, the underfunding of and overly optimistic unemployment predictions for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act when it was being crafted ensured the perception of failure, thus guaranteeing there would not be a second. So much the simplest way to trim the budget deficit cited by the New York Times’ David Leonhardt : cultivate growth . In March, former Obama administration economic adviser Christina Romer called the lack of action on job creation “shameful.” ‘I frankly don’t understand why policy makers aren’t more worried about the suffering of real families. I think there are tools we have tools…that we can use, and I think it’s shameful that we’re not using them….If I have a complaint about policy these days, it’s that we’re not doing enough. That goes all the way up to the Federal Reserve, [which] could be taking more aggressive action. It goes to the Congress and the Administration – there are fiscal policy actions they could be taking.” Reacting to the latest GDP downgrades and the implication for the American jobs deficit, a panicked Brad Delong suggested what some of those actions might be. It is, he said, “time for pulling more spending from the future forward into the present, and pushing more taxes from the present back into the future.” Writing in the New Yorks Times, David Leonhardt asked, “The economy is wavering; does Washington notice?” Sadly, the answer appears to be no. Unfortunately for the millions of unemployed, Republicans have intimidated Democrats and conned the American people into believing the budget deficit is the only one that matters. (An earlier version of this piece appeared at Perrspectives .)

Continue reading …

Patriot Act

No Comment
Patriot Act

Sen. Rand Paul: “I Rise In Response to a Scurrilous Accusation” Senator Kyl’s office (AR) informs that patriot act has passed with no amendmants Senator Reid cheering Democrats in December 2005 that they “killed the Patriot Act”. InfoWarhorseCom says: Rand Paul's Fight to End Patriot Act Gaining Votes: http://tinyurl.com/3vmjnlv

Continue reading …

Movie Times

No Comment
Movie Times

Best Buy Garmin nuvi 1690 4.3-Inch AIESEC July National Conference 2011 – Pre-Conference Promo Fast Five Movie Times Bitesized_KB says: @shecallmedaddy_ I'm bout to look at movie times

Continue reading …