Click here to view this media via WMFY, Greensboro. Instead of Bank of America foreclosing on some Florida homeowner, the homeowners had sheriff’s deputies foreclose on the bank. It started five months ago when Bank of America filed foreclosure papers on the home of a couple, who didn’t owe a dime on their home. The couple said they paid cash for the house. The case went to court and the homeowners were able to prove they didn’t owe Bank of America anything on the house. In fact, it was proven that the couple never even had a mortgage bill to pay. We’ve heard this story a thousand times before, haven’t we? So, how did it end with bank being foreclosed on? After more than 5 months of the judge’s ruling, the bank still hadn’t paid the legal fees, and the homeowner’s attorney did exactly what the bank tried to do to the homeowners. He seized the bank’s assets. “They’ve ignored our calls, ignored our letters, legally this is the next step to get my clients compensated, ” attorney Todd Allen told CBS. Sheriff’s deputies, movers, and the Nyergers’ attorney went to the bank and foreclosed on it. The attorney gave instructions to to remove desks, computers, copiers, filing cabinets and any cash in the teller’s drawers. After about an hour of being locked out of the bank, the bank manager handed the attorney a check for the legal fees. “As a foreclosure defense attorney this is sweet justice” says Allen. Sweet indeed.
Continue reading …Congressman Joe Walsh (R-IL), sponsor of the House Balanced Budget Amendment bill, is drawing a line in the sand and refusing to raise the debt limit. He has sent out another video message to Obama evincing his unequivocal rejection of Tim Geithner’s fallacious fear-mongering . As some members of leadership go wobbly on the Balanced Budget Amendment, we must remind them why they obtained their leadership… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Red State Discovery Date : 03/06/2011 16:14 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Article by WN.com Correspondent Dallas Darling. When Congressman Allen West, Republican from Florida, reacted strongly against a bipartisan amendment to end the trillion dollar war in Afghanistan by declaring anti-war colleagues should “get shot” to understand the true threat of the Taliban, it showed how representation can sometimes turn into repression. Sadly, it also revealed a tyrannical past of how other anti-war members of Congress, starting with Jeanette Rankin, have been repeatedly bullied and even threatened. Elected to the House of Representatives in 1916, Rankin was the first woman to serve in Congress. She believed in true representation, in that, she wanted to characterize to…
Continue reading …This post has been updated. A work trip for two men on Wednesday afternoon didn’t go as planned when the tornado in Springfield, Massachusetts crossed Interstate 91, leaving a trail of debris and the two stunned bystanders at a loss for words. The description for the video calls this the “worst work trip ever,” and, judging by the video, they might not be that far off. “That was an adrenaline rush, man,” one of the men says nervously when it’s all over. Watch the video below and let us know what you think. Warning — video contains explicit language. At least four people died in tornadoes in Massachusetts on Wednesday.
Continue reading …Elisabeth Hasselbeck says Sarah Palin is “manipulating” the media away from giving attention to Mitt Romney. On Thursday’s “The View,” Hasslebeck argued that although the country is facing major economic problems — something she claims is Romney’s strength — Palin’s bus tour is dominating the headlines about the Republican presidential contenders. “If I had termites in my house, I’d get someone in there who could deal with it,” Hasselbeck said. “Mitt Romney, right now, his specialty is the economy. I’d have him in there. Here’s why we’re not hearing it: because Sarah Palin’s on a bus, and right now she’s manipulating, in terms of media attention.” WATCH: if(typeof AOLVP_cfg===’undefined’)AOLVP_cfg=[];AOLVP_cfg.push({id:’AOLVP_973032409001′,’codever’:0.1, ‘autoload’:true, ‘autoplay’:false, ‘playerid’:’61371448001′, ‘videoid’:’973032409001′, ‘width’:512, ‘height’:288, ‘stillurl’:’http://pdl.stream.aol.com/pdlext/aol/brightcove/aolmaster/1612833736/1612833736_972948952001_ari-origin29-arc-524-1307033347959.jpg?pubId=1612833736′, ‘playertype’:’inline’,’videotitle’:’Elisabeth blames Palin for Romney’s lack of support 06/02/11 – TV Replay’,’videodesc’:’ABC’,’videolink’:’#’}); Hasselbeck, of course, once campaigned alongside Palin when she was on the presidential ticket in 2008. But this isn’t the first instance of the “View” co-host coming out against Palin. Shortly after Gabrielle Giffords was shot in Tucson, Hasselbeck condemned Palin’s notorious “crosshairs” ad, calling it “despicable.”
Continue reading …Ellen Barkin signing autographs in person Ellen Barkin’s Cougarific Hookup Charlie Rose – The Normal Heart 06/01/11 hellojayveegams says: RT @AndersonCooper : Just watched ellen barkin on @piersmorgan . She is so cool and her play #thenormalheart is amazingly powerful
Continue reading …If there’s one thing both parties seem to have in common, it’s that they can always come together to support another endless war . Their favorite motto? Si vis pacem, para bellum (If you want peace, prepare for war.) Bipartisanship! President Obama could get a second chance to sell Congress on the military operation in Libya, thanks to some last-minute help from an unlikely ally: House Speaker John A. Boehner. On Thursday, with some liberals and conservatives trying to get Congress to force a withdrawal from Libya, Boehner (R-Ohio) offered an alternative. He introduced a resolution that would give Obama 14 more days to make his case. Boehner’s resolution would vent congressional anger, stating that “the president has not sought, and Congress has not provided, authorization” for the operation. It also contains a threat that Congress might cut off funding if Obama defies Congress. But the resolution stops short of demanding that the operation stop and doesn’t declare that Congress officially disapproves of it. On Wednesday, Republican leaders had to abruptly shelve a proposal from one of Congress’s perennial outliers — Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio) — that would have demanded Obama withdraw forces from the Libya campaign within 15 days. The bill turned out to have much broader support than expected. Boehner’s resolution was intended as a less-drastic way to express congressional unhappiness. In a meeting with fellow Republicans on Thursday afternoon, Boehner said of Kucinich’s bill that it would be wrong to abruptly pull out of a NATO-led operation .
Continue reading …enlarge Credit: http://aroundtheworldblog.blogspot.com I’ve written about Delta Airlines’ anti-union positions earlier: Anti-union campaign goes to Washington — helped by airlines like Delta From mcjoan of Dkos: The House will vote on the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization and the provision in it which would essentially codify vote fraud in organizing elections. A recap: last year the the National Mediation Board that oversees those elections ruled that the railroad and airline industries would have to end their practice of counting non-votes in these elections as no votes. Previously, any eligible worker who chose not to vote was automatically counted as a no. Which would be fraud in any other election in the United State. The industries, and most House Republicans, want the rule back. Fast forward. The anti-union push is building, in part fueled by one particular airline’s zeal to kill fairness in the workplace . I’m at the point that I will never fly Delta again. I think you should consider it too. Air travel is no day in the park and many people want to book a flight and be done with it, but there comes a time when even if it causes us more inconvenience, we have to do the right thing…. read on Since I wrote this, Delta has only upped the ante and become the Scott Walker in the skies airline: Around The World Blog: Delta has been the #1 worst U.S. airline every year in a row since the founding of this blog– and that’s just based on their service. Turns out, though, there’s more to Delta’s unsuitability as a reliable travel partner than how badly the management runs their operations. As yesterday’s Wall Street Journal pointed out, the airline is a bastion of right-wing anti-worker extremism . No wonder their employees always seem so down in the dumps and resentful! The National Mediation Board is now investigating charges by flight attendants that Delta, the only non-Union U.S. airline, illegally interfered in unionization elections by pressuring employees to vote against the unions. As Joe Sudbay observed at AmericaBlog yesterday, “Delta is like the Scott Walker of airlines. It wants to be known as anti-worker.” We can probably expect even more skullduggery from Delta in the coming weeks as they double down in their anti-union jihad. They’ve been a lead driver in pushing Republican extremists in the House to rescind fair election rules for air/rail workers for elections conducted under the National Mediation Board. For progressives who care about keeping elections fair, giving workers the choice whether or not they want to join a union, and supporting companies who operate under basic standards of decency, there are a number of reasons for progressives to be outraged about Delta Airlines: • Open advocacy against fair American elections: Delta issued a press release commending the news that Darrell Issa’s deranged Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will investigate the NMB’s 2010 decision to conduct union elections for air/rail workers the same as all other types of American elections . Mike Campbell, Delta’s executive vice president of H.R. and Labor Relations said, “This investigation is an important victory for Delta people because it will finally allow the facts to speak for themselves.” Unfortunately for Delta, the facts aren’t on their side– there’s no reason to conduct NMB elections differently from every other form of election, union or non-union, in the nation. If congressional and Senate elections were conducted under such rules, in which non-participating eligible voters were counted as having voted, then zero Members of Congress would have won their last election. • Bumping paying customers…so Delta employees can lobby: Delta is so committed to its anti-union ideology that it offered its employees the chance to travel to Washington to lobby against fair union elections under a provision that may bump paying customers. Talking Points Memo reported that the group No Way AFA, “a coalition of Delta employees who want to deliberalize union rights,” came to Washington the week of the House vote on the FAA Reauthorization bill to lobby against fair election standards… and potentially bumping paying Delta customers in the process. According to the article, “A Delta spokesperson said No Way AFA operates separately from the company itself, but that the company “allow[s] employees to travel positive space to D.C. when supporting legislative efforts that the company supports.” According to TPM, this means that “the “positive space” fly-in could squeeze out seating space for regular travelers.” • Free upgrades and lining the pockets of policymaker friends: An investigative journalism piece in Georgia recently found that leading Republican lawmakers in Georgia’s state legislature received free upgrades from Delta to platinum status, valued at approximately $10,000 to $15,000 per year. Valued as campaign contributions, the piece noted that Delta low-balled the reported value of the platinum upgrades in state ethics records. Unsurprisingly, Delta has a long history of being generous to lawmakers like Rep. John Mica, who have voted the right way in Delta’s eyes by seeking to return NMB union elections to the old, undemocratic rules. I’ve long been going out of my way to look for alternatives to flying on Delta just because of the lousy service and their refusal to let people use frequent flier miles, but now I can see there are even more reasons to avoid the worst airline in the skies. If you’re not like Stuart Varney of Fox News and disapprove of Gov. Scott Walker’s union-busting tactics in Wisconsin, you should take a stand against Delta Airlines. Just fly anyone else.
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — In a meeting with House Democrats on Thursday, President Obama stressed that his administration would draw a firm line on taxes and revenues both in the deficit- and debt-reduction debates and in the buildup to the 2012 elections. According to multiple meeting attendees, the president reiterated on several occasions that a deal to raise the country’s debt ceiling would include revenue increases, even as Republican lawmakers insist that such a deal should be restricted to spending cuts and entitlement reforms. “I’ve been very clear about revenues as a part of a balanced package, and I will continue to be,” said Obama. Underscoring his commitment, Obama noted taxes would be a defining area of contrast with Republicans on the campaign trail. He insisted that he would not compromise again on his position that the tax rates for the top earners be raised to pre-Bush levels. “‘Whatever we agree on, we are still going to have plenty to argue about in 2012,’” a senior administration official said, paraphrasing the president. “‘I’ve said I’m not going to renew the tax cuts for the top two percent. We might agree on tax reform or simplification, but on the upper-income tax cuts we are just going to have to agree to disagree.’” Two House Democrat attendees confirmed the substance of those remarks. One of those lawmakers, who agreed to speak about the event on condition of anonymity, said that members were “worried that the Obama Administration would cave [in debt ceiling negotiations] because Republicans were willing to default on our debt if they don’t get what they want.” The President responded by saying it was vital to have revenues as part of the mix, stressing that a budget can’t be balanced on non-defense discretionary spending or the “backs of the most vulnerable.” Obama added, according to the member, that, “he would not support extending the Bush tax cuts for the top two percent again no matter what hostages Republicans took.” That line in the sand was greeted warmly by attendees, many of whom were disillusioned with the administration’s decision to cut a deal with congressional Republicans in December 2010 that allowed all of the Bush tax cuts to continue. The politics now are notably different. As pressure has mounted for lawmakers to make major cuts, both to discretionary spending and entitlement programs, Democrats have turned to raising revenues as a partial budget substitute. As a Democratic source briefed on Thursday’s meeting relayed, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was adamant that the party not cut Medicare benefits. A recent upset victory in New York’s 26th district has seemingly provided the party with the type of template to win the tax-and-spend debate. At the Thursday White House meeting, newly-minted member of Congress Kathy Hochul (D-N.Y.) received an enthusiastic welcome. Addressing both the caucus and the president, she explained how she won the office not just by defending Medicare, but by speaking out about tax equity. “She talked about how she had been attacked on taxes but won anyway,” said the senior administration official. “She said she would talk to small business owners about the fact that they pay a higher rate than General Electric.” The tone of the more than hour-long discussion, the official said, was positive, with the president ending the affair by referring to the party as a “family.” Other attendees, however, said that the discussion was not without its points of friction. As The Huffington Post’s Michael McAuliff reported, Obama largely rebuffed requests from congressional Democrats to be more forceful in deficit and debt discussions with Republicans, noting that the office he holds requires a more delicate touch: “He was a little testy with the [Rep. Henry] Waxman question. Essentially, Mr. Waxman was urging him to fight more,” one legislator said. “The president reminded folks that he’s the president sitting in that chair and he knows how to negotiate.” Obama also told the assembled Democrats not to count on more fiery rhetoric from the Oval Office. “He said, ‘There’s a difference between me and a member of Congress,’” another lawmaker said, paraphrasing the president as saying: “When I say something the markets react, all of society reacts, other countries react. I’ve got to be careful with what I say. I can’t just say it for brinkmanship. I’ve got to say it in a way so that I get what I want said, but I don’t upset markets and so on.” “He said it like this,” the Democrat elaborated: “‘When Eric Cantor says something, Eric Cantor says something. When I say something, markets and countries and people react in a way where it could cause us more problems than we have now.’”
Continue reading …Government claims attack on presidential compound was ‘attempted coup’ as fighting intensifies in Sana’a Yemen’s embattled president survived an apparent attempt to kill him on Friday as fighting intensified in Sana’a amidst warnings that the country is sliding inexorably into all-out war. Ali Abdullah Saleh, who has ruled Yemen for 32 years, emerged defiant from his compound in the capital after it was attacked: shells or a missile hit a mosque inside, killing three guards and a cleric and lightly injuring him and two other senior government figures. The incident fuelled growing anxieties that the Arab uprisings, which have have brought dramatic changes to Egypt and Tunisia, is turning Yemen — already the Arab world’s poorest country — into something far more volatile and dangerous. The government was quick to accuse Saleh’s bitter rival, Hamid al-Ahmar of the opposition Islah party, of launching the attack, and government forces immediately shelled his mansion in Sana’a. “The al-Ahmars have committed a great crime, and crossed a red line,” said Tareq al-Shami, a government spokesman. “This was an attempted coup, and the government will take all necessary measures.” Sadeq al-Ahmar, head of the powerful Hashid tribal federation, blamed Saleh himself for the shelling, saying it was carried out to help justify the government’s escalation of streetfighting in the capital. Saleh, who was treated at a military hospital, was reported to be preparing to give a press conference later. Claims of his death were first reported by an oppostion TV station and made headlines around the world before being denied. Abdul Ghani al-Iryani, a Yemeni political analyst, told al-Jazeera it was “quite reasonable to assume” that Ahmar’s fighters were behind the palace attack. “[The tribesmen] probably wanted him to know that [Saleh] can no longer attack them with impunity, and that they can reach him as he can reach them,” Iryani said. Other regional analysts say the chances for a democratic or peaceful transition of power in Yemen are slim. It was a violent end to a violent week. On Thursday government jets strafed roads and villages north of Sana’a as thousands of tribesmen tried to enter the capital to fight Saleh loyalists. Residents described an atmosphere of fear and alarm at food shortages and rising prices. Saleh has reneged on a deal brokered by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states under which he would step down in return for an amnesty to be followed by free elections. The US, which has leaned on the Yemeni leader in its fight against al-Qaida, has increased pressure for Saleh to go, blaming the bloodshed on his backpedalling from the agreement. Britain and the EU are also pushing hard for him to implement it. The latest violence is likely to persuade neighbouring Saudi Arabia, which has strong ties with the Yemeni tribes, to strongly press Saleh to step aside, and so avert disaster in a country where half of the 23 million people owns a gun. The attack on the president came after Friday prayers, with heavy artillery repeatedly striking the presidential compound and shaking nearby buildings. The streets were deserted after many residents fled the city for the safety of nearby villages. “People there were happy to hear that he [the president] had been killed, but then the government denied that,” said Ibrahim Mothana, 22, a student. “It means we will experience an escalation and it will probably be more violent.” Another resident told the Guardian: “The streets are empty. I managed to go out yesterday to buy some food but the prices are going up daily. In the street where I live all the families have gone back to their villages and just left a family member to stay behind to look after the house. There must be more than 100,000 in total who have left the city.” The US emphasised the need for an orderly and peaceful transfer of power. “Violence cannot resolve the issues that confront Yemen, and today’s events cannot be a justification for a new round of fighting,” a White House spokesman said. President Barack Obama’s counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, spent two days this week trying to peruade the Saudis and the UAE to boost efforts to help bring an end to Yemen’s violence. On Thursday, the official Yemeni news agency said the government was, again, willing to endorse the Gulf-brokered transition agreement. Yemen Middle East Ian Black guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …