New York congressman says he is sorry for his conduct but insists he did not break any law and won’t resign A painfully embarrassing week for the New York Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner was brought to an excruciating denouement when he admitted that he had sent sexually suggestive photographs of himself over the internet, confessed to lying to cover it up but said that he was not resigning. In a half-hour press conference during which he at several times was fighting back tears, Weiner made a total and grovelling apology. After days in which he had at first claimed the photographs were hacked out of his computer and sent without his knowledge, he said he took responsibility for his “dumb” actions. “To be clear, the picture was of me, and I sent it. I’m deeply sorry for the pain this has caused my wife, and our family, my constituents, my friends, my supporters and my staff,” he said. Weiner said several times that he would not stand down from the New York district that he has represented for 13 years, saying he had broken no rules or laws. But the wheels of the Democratic party machine were quickly cranking into action against him. Nancy Pelosi, the leader of the minority Democratic group in the House of Representatives, called for an ethics committee investigation to investigate him – a move that will pile on the pressure on Weiner who was until recently seen as a rising star of the party. The congressman’s confession came after it became clear that his story could not hold. A few hours before he spoke, the conservative website that had first broken the story, BigGovernment.com, had come out with a new set of photographs showing Weiner in semi-clad postures that the site said had been sent to an unnamed woman last month. Andrew Breitbart, the founder of the website, hijacked Weiner’s press conference, taking to the stage before the congressman appeared to berate him and the media for accepting his lie that the photographs had been hacked. Weiner said that he had had inappropriate internet communications with six women, some of which had happened after he had married Huma Abedin, a close aide to the secretary of state Hillary Clinton. But he insisted the relationships had never been physical and he had never met any of the individuals involved. The first communication to be uncovered was a photograph of a man in his underwear sent from his Twitter feed to a 21-year-old woman. He said he had sent it as a joke, then tried to cover it up by claiming his account had been hacked. “I lied because I was ashamed at what I had done, and I didn’t want to get caught.” United States New York US politics Democrats Twitter Ed Pilkington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …CBS News has lately been running ads touting their new Evening News anchor Scott Pelley as bringing “the world class original reporting of 60 Minutes, now every weeknight.” If so, those who hoped CBS would finally shift towards a more fair-and-balanced approach to the news may again be disappointed. Last year, MRC news analysts reviewed “the world class reporting” on 60 Minutes and found a lopsided agenda that strongly favored liberals. In the previous five years, 60 Minutes aired 35 interviews with liberal leaders and celebrities, most of which (69%) were friendly and unchallenging. In contrast, only five of the 17 conservative segments (29 percent) were soft, a huge tilt both in the amount and the tone of CBS’s coverage. In a “ Profile in Bias ” report MRC put together earlier this spring, Pelley’s 60 Minutes segments were well-represented for his generous coverage of liberals, including Hillary Clinton (“star power”) and retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. Pelley also used his podium to make a case for universal health insurance and decried the horrible economy as seemingly taken from “the pages of the Great Depression” (that was during the Bush years, when unemployment was 5%, not during the Obama years). And, when one of his 60 Minutes pieces on global warming came under fire as being too one-sided, he disdained those who disagreed as akin to “Holocaust deniers,” grumbling to a reporter for CBSNews.com: “If I do an interview with Elie Wiesel, am I required as a journalist to find a Holocaust denier?” Here are a few of Pelley’s most notorious moments at CBS thus far (for the full package, visit www.MRC.org):
Continue reading …Journalists taken to see ‘bomb victim’ in Libyan hospital find out child was hurt in road accident The Libyan government’s attempts to show how Nato bombing is harming civilians backfired when a hospital worker revealed that a seven-month-old “air strike victim” had been injured in a car crash. Foreign journalists in Tripoli were taken by bus to a hospital on Sunday night to see the seven-month-old girl, Nasib, who lay unconscious. Media handlers claimed she had been hurt when a bomb exploded in a field near her house on the eastern edge of the capital a few hours earlier. But a member of the medical staff slipped a note written in English on hospital stationery to a reporter, which was seen by Reuters, that said: “This is a case of road traffic accident. This is the truth.” Journalists’ suspicions had already been raised during an earlier visit to the bombsite in the suburb of Tajura where the girl was said to have been injured. Talking to journalists, Mohamed Elounsi, the son of the owner of the field, described how a black and white dog and a dozen or so chickens and pigeons had been killed in the evening strike, but said nobody had been injured. Elounsi said: “I lost my birds, one dog and my cows nearly died.” Shockwaves from the blast destroyed a room in one house and shattered numerous windows, he said. “My message to Obama is, ‘Why do you send this [bomb] to my father’s farm.’” Residents gathered around the crater, measuring two metres by one metre, chanting pro-Muammar Gaddafi slogans. Initially, none of them mentioned any civilian casualties and there seemed little real anger. It was only shortly before the bus departed that one neighbour said his four-year-daughter suffered cuts when a glass door shattered. At the hospital, Gaddafi’s aides directed the media to Nasib, whose bandaged foot was hooked up to medical equipment. A man introduced as her uncle said she had been injured in the Tajura missile strike. A second man, presented as a neighbour and a member of the health ministry, ranted against Nato and shouted “God, Muammar, Libya, and that’s all”. This man, who gave his name as Emad, was mysteriously present once more when journalists were taken to another suburb at 1am on Monday. This time, a “bomb” had landed in a back garden at about midnight “while the family were having lunch”, according to a man presented as a spokesman for the family. The two metre-long bomb had fallen from the sky, he said, implying it came from a Nato jet. It had not exploded, however, and appeared less like an example of cutting-edge warfare than a remnant of the cold war. Closer inspection showed there was Russian writing on the bomb. That fact was put to Emad, who had since admitted he was a member of Gaddafi’s media team, while still insisting he was also a neighbour of the seven-month-old girl. Emad’s story of the midnight bomb suddenly changed: Nato must have struck a nearby military compound, triggering an explosion that caused this missile – a piece of Gaddafi’s own arsenal – to shoot off into a nearby garden. On Monday, during a visit to complex of state buildings that were bombed overnight, deputy foreign minister Khaled Kaim denied that the regime was deliberately trying to mislead the media. “We want to be as credible as much as possible. If there was a mistake it was not from the government.” He suggested that civilians angered by Nato’s campaign might have been to blame. The government says that 700 civilians have died in bombing raids, but have offered little evidence to support the claim. The majority of the airstrikes in Tripoli appear to have been so precise that life in the city has carried on largely as normal, with people out on the streets well into the night, when most of the bombing takes place. Kaim’s comments were the first by a senior government official on any topic since last Wednesday. He strongly criticised the bombing of the government buildings, which included the offices of the foreign affairs parliamentary committee and the attorney general, saying they had no link to the military. He also said that Gaddafi, who has not appeared in public or on television for a week, was in “very good” health, and in direct contact with the government. Libya Middle East Africa Arab and Middle East unrest Muammar Gaddafi Nato Xan Rice guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s inability to stem the foreclosure crisis ricocheted dramatically on Friday, as the Labor Department released unexpectedly low job-growth numbers that pushed the unemployment rate back over 9 percent. The jobs report comes on the heels of both a devastating report that found housing prices hit new lows in March and warnings from economists that the tumbling real estate market threatens to drag the economy back into recession. “The jobs numbers, they ain’t pretty, man,” economist Jared Bernstein told HuffPost. Bernstein left the Obama administration last month to join the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities, a highly respected left-of-center Washington think tank. “You don’t wanna make too much out of one month, but when that month reflects other trends in the economy, you want to take note.” “The bottom line is that the job market simply isn’t meeting the basic employment and income needs of working families,” he said. “This is an emergency,” said Preeti Vissa, community reinvestment director of the Greenlining Institute, a foreclosure relief advocacy group. “The ongoing foreclosure crisis is well on the way to dragging the whole economy into a double-dip recession if strong action isn’t taken immediately.” The connection between the foreclosure crisis and rampant unemployment is well known by economists and the administration. Diving home values and heavy debt burdens force cutbacks in both consumer spending and tax revenue for local governments. These reduced spending levels and lower government revenues force layoffs in both the public and private sector. And those layoffs, in turn, spur more foreclosures. A July 2010 report from the International Monetary Fund suggested that foreclosure problems added 1.25 points to the unemployment rate — or more than 10 percent. On Thursday, President Barack Obama warned House Democrats in a private meeting that the housing situation could drag down the entire economy. His stated concern about foreclosures, however, doesn’t match up with the administration’s public response. One House Democrat who was in the meeting complained that the president “said housing was the main thing dragging down the economy, with Geithner nodding solemnly like they’d done everything humanly possible for the last 27 months to fix the housing market.” Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) said Obama’s approach to the foreclosure crisis has been “an absolute failure” and predicted it will continue to drag down the economy unless he changes tack. “For the life of me, I can’t figure out why a community organizer who says he cares about families, who says he cares about communities, has just turned his back on one of the biggest problems in America,” said Cardoza, who co-chairs the Democratic Caucus Housing Stabilization Task Force. “The way they get defensive when you point out it’s been a failure just underscores to me they don’t have a clue about what to do.” Cardoza’s central California district has been hit hard by foreclosures. The three cities he represents — Modesto, Stockton and Merced — all rank in the top 10 cities with the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Three out of five homeowners in his district are “underwater,” owing more on their home loans than their houses are worth. “I don’t blame [the administration] for causing the housing crisis,” Cardoza said. “But at two-and-a-half years in office, if they can’t figure out something to do soon that turns us around, I guarantee you they will pay for this at the ballot box.” Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said Tuesday that he plans to renew his push on the administration in the coming weeks to put housing issues on the front burner. Specifically, he called for a better mortgage modification system and foreclosure intervention that includes third-party mediation. “Our economy cannot recover until our housing market recovers,” Merkley said in a statement. Republicans took shots at Obama for botching both the economic policy and the messaging. “There’s an old axiom in politics: under-promise, but over-deliver,” said a Senate GOP leadership aide. “He did the opposite.” For nearly a year, the Obama administration has been boasting to voters of economic improvement. The White House embarked on a PR blitz dubbed “Recovery Summer” last year and toured the country to spread the good news that jobs were finally coming back. Political strategists say that message is not convincing businesses, consumers or voters. The heavy losses sustained by congressional Democrats in the November 2010 elections were largely the result of the sagging economy. “They’ve gotta show that they’re gonna be on the side of the middle class in these hard times,” said Mike Lux, CEO of Progressive Strategies, a Democratic political consulting firm. “The only way an administration wins when they’re governing during hard times is by convincing people you’re still working for them in the middle of a very tough moment. I just don’t think there’s any way to convince people that the economy is good, because it ain’t.” That call for a new economic narrative from Obama reflects consistent polling results from Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, who urged Democrats on Thursday to alter their message to reflect “a real economy” outside Washington “that’s not changing.” “The indicators are all speaking together that something more needs to be done,” Bernstein told HuffPost. “I’m not sure there’s any magic to such a pivot other than to stand up and say something needs to be done.” Bernstein recently defended the administration’s inaction on housing, saying that it had been very difficult politically to provide relief to borrowers. In an early May interview with HuffPost, White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee cheered what appeared to be three consecutive months of stronger job growth. “It’s clearly a trend,” Goolsbee said. “We’ve had, in the last three months, an average gain of a quarter of a million private-sector jobs a month. That could not be more different than the three-quarters of a million jobs we were losing when the president took office.” But today’s numbers undermine confidence in the trend. The Labor Department revised prior months’ job gains so that the past three months — March, April and May — showed an average climb of just 160,000 jobs per month, only marginally better than the 152,000 increase seen in the prior three-month period. The administration’s claims of job market improvement have frequently been coupled with caveats. Even the triumphant Goolsbee warned last month that “we’ve got a long way to go” on the economy. But the administration has been unwavering in its claims that its signature foreclosure relief effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program, has been a success. Anti-foreclosure advocates have long bemoaned the program as overly reliant on the very Wall Street banks whose reckless lending helped spark the housing and financial mess. HAMP was also thoroughly criticized in several reports from the Congressional Oversight Panel for the bank bailout, and a new report from the Government Accountability Office indicated that over 75 percent of housing counselors have a negative view of HAMP. The program has only helped a small fraction of the 3 million to 4 million borrowers that President Obama claimed it would aid when the initiative was announced in February. Some homeowners have reported being stuck in limbo for more than a year. Advocates say several other plans could provide relief without creating “moral hazard” — a term economists use to describe a policy that could inadvertently encourage economically destructive behavior. By revising bankruptcy law to allow judges to write-off mortgage debt in bankruptcy, struggling homeowners could receive aid, provided they were willing to subject themselves to the financial hardships of filing for bankruptcy. Alternatively, economist Dean Baker, co-director of the progressive Center for Economic and Policy Research, has promoted a “right-to-rent” policy, in which borrowers on the brink of foreclosure would be given the right to rent their homes for up to five years. Since banks are reluctant to operate as landlords, Baker says the policy would encourage banks to offer meaningful loan modifications. Still, Bernstein added, the administration needs to resist the “cut spending craze,” which “threatens to make an already tough situation worse.” While congressional Republicans are unlikely to let up in their political assault on government spending, he noted that a bipartisan commission led by former Federal Reserve Vice Chairwoman Alice Rivlin and ex-Sen. Pete Dominici (R-N.M.) in Nov. 2010 proposed a payroll tax cut that could create jobs by putting more money in workers’ pockets. The Rivilin-Dominici plan recommended that the government lift all payroll taxes for both companies and employees for one year. This report has been updated to include comment from Cardoza, Merkley and the Senate GOP aide. Ryan Grim contributed to this report.
Continue reading …WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s inability to stem the foreclosure crisis ricocheted dramatically on Friday, as the Labor Department released unexpectedly low job-growth numbers that pushed the unemployment rate back over 9 percent. The jobs report comes on the heels of both a devastating report that found housing prices hit new lows in March and warnings from economists that the tumbling real estate market threatens to drag the economy back into recession. “The jobs numbers, they ain’t pretty, man,” economist Jared Bernstein told HuffPost. Bernstein left the Obama administration last month to join the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities, a highly respected left-of-center Washington think tank. “You don’t wanna make too much out of one month, but when that month reflects other trends in the economy, you want to take note.” “The bottom line is that the job market simply isn’t meeting the basic employment and income needs of working families,” he said. “This is an emergency,” said Preeti Vissa, community reinvestment director of the Greenlining Institute, a foreclosure relief advocacy group. “The ongoing foreclosure crisis is well on the way to dragging the whole economy into a double-dip recession if strong action isn’t taken immediately.” The connection between the foreclosure crisis and rampant unemployment is well known by economists and the administration. Diving home values and heavy debt burdens force cutbacks in both consumer spending and tax revenue for local governments. These reduced spending levels and lower government revenues force layoffs in both the public and private sector. And those layoffs, in turn, spur more foreclosures. A July 2010 report from the International Monetary Fund suggested that foreclosure problems added 1.25 points to the unemployment rate — or more than 10 percent. On Thursday, President Barack Obama warned House Democrats in a private meeting that the housing situation could drag down the entire economy. His stated concern about foreclosures, however, doesn’t match up with the administration’s public response. One House Democrat who was in the meeting complained that the president “said housing was the main thing dragging down the economy, with Geithner nodding solemnly like they’d done everything humanly possible for the last 27 months to fix the housing market.” Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) said Obama’s approach to the foreclosure crisis has been “an absolute failure” and predicted it will continue to drag down the economy unless he changes tack. “For the life of me, I can’t figure out why a community organizer who says he cares about families, who says he cares about communities, has just turned his back on one of the biggest problems in America,” said Cardoza, who co-chairs the Democratic Caucus Housing Stabilization Task Force. “The way they get defensive when you point out it’s been a failure just underscores to me they don’t have a clue about what to do.” Cardoza’s central California district has been hit hard by foreclosures. The three cities he represents — Modesto, Stockton and Merced — all rank in the top 10 cities with the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Three out of five homeowners in his district are “underwater,” owing more on their home loans than their houses are worth. “I don’t blame [the administration] for causing the housing crisis,” Cardoza said. “But at two-and-a-half years in office, if they can’t figure out something to do soon that turns us around, I guarantee you they will pay for this at the ballot box.” Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said Tuesday that he plans to renew his push on the administration in the coming weeks to put housing issues on the front burner. Specifically, he called for a better mortgage modification system and foreclosure intervention that includes third-party mediation. “Our economy cannot recover until our housing market recovers,” Merkley said in a statement. Republicans took shots at Obama for botching both the economic policy and the messaging. “There’s an old axiom in politics: under-promise, but over-deliver,” said a Senate GOP leadership aide. “He did the opposite.” For nearly a year, the Obama administration has been boasting to voters of economic improvement. The White House embarked on a PR blitz dubbed “Recovery Summer” last year and toured the country to spread the good news that jobs were finally coming back. Political strategists say that message is not convincing businesses, consumers or voters. The heavy losses sustained by congressional Democrats in the November 2010 elections were largely the result of the sagging economy. “They’ve gotta show that they’re gonna be on the side of the middle class in these hard times,” said Mike Lux, CEO of Progressive Strategies, a Democratic political consulting firm. “The only way an administration wins when they’re governing during hard times is by convincing people you’re still working for them in the middle of a very tough moment. I just don’t think there’s any way to convince people that the economy is good, because it ain’t.” That call for a new economic narrative from Obama reflects consistent polling results from Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, who urged Democrats on Thursday to alter their message to reflect “a real economy” outside Washington “that’s not changing.” “The indicators are all speaking together that something more needs to be done,” Bernstein told HuffPost. “I’m not sure there’s any magic to such a pivot other than to stand up and say something needs to be done.” Bernstein recently defended the administration’s inaction on housing, saying that it had been very difficult politically to provide relief to borrowers. In an early May interview with HuffPost, White House economic adviser Austan Goolsbee cheered what appeared to be three consecutive months of stronger job growth. “It’s clearly a trend,” Goolsbee said. “We’ve had, in the last three months, an average gain of a quarter of a million private-sector jobs a month. That could not be more different than the three-quarters of a million jobs we were losing when the president took office.” But today’s numbers undermine confidence in the trend. The Labor Department revised prior months’ job gains so that the past three months — March, April and May — showed an average climb of just 160,000 jobs per month, only marginally better than the 152,000 increase seen in the prior three-month period. The administration’s claims of job market improvement have frequently been coupled with caveats. Even the triumphant Goolsbee warned last month that “we’ve got a long way to go” on the economy. But the administration has been unwavering in its claims that its signature foreclosure relief effort, the Home Affordable Modification Program, has been a success. Anti-foreclosure advocates have long bemoaned the program as overly reliant on the very Wall Street banks whose reckless lending helped spark the housing and financial mess. HAMP was also thoroughly criticized in several reports from the Congressional Oversight Panel for the bank bailout, and a new report from the Government Accountability Office indicated that over 75 percent of housing counselors have a negative view of HAMP. The program has only helped a small fraction of the 3 million to 4 million borrowers that President Obama claimed it would aid when the initiative was announced in February. Some homeowners have reported being stuck in limbo for more than a year. Advocates say several other plans could provide relief without creating “moral hazard” — a term economists use to describe a policy that could inadvertently encourage economically destructive behavior. By revising bankruptcy law to allow judges to write-off mortgage debt in bankruptcy, struggling homeowners could receive aid, provided they were willing to subject themselves to the financial hardships of filing for bankruptcy. Alternatively, economist Dean Baker, co-director of the progressive Center for Economic and Policy Research, has promoted a “right-to-rent” policy, in which borrowers on the brink of foreclosure would be given the right to rent their homes for up to five years. Since banks are reluctant to operate as landlords, Baker says the policy would encourage banks to offer meaningful loan modifications. Still, Bernstein added, the administration needs to resist the “cut spending craze,” which “threatens to make an already tough situation worse.” While congressional Republicans are unlikely to let up in their political assault on government spending, he noted that a bipartisan commission led by former Federal Reserve Vice Chairwoman Alice Rivlin and ex-Sen. Pete Dominici (R-N.M.) in Nov. 2010 proposed a payroll tax cut that could create jobs by putting more money in workers’ pockets. The Rivilin-Dominici plan recommended that the government lift all payroll taxes for both companies and employees for one year. This report has been updated to include comment from Cardoza, Merkley and the Senate GOP aide. Ryan Grim contributed to this report.
Continue reading …Outgoing speaker arrested by anti-corruption agency on suspicion of fraud after four-hour standoff at his home in Abuja Nigeria’s anti-corruption agency has arrested one of the country’s leading politicians on suspicion of defrauding the country, an official said. Officers arrested outgoing speaker of the house of representatives, Dimeji Bankole, at his home in Abuja on Sunday, after he resisted arrest for more than four hours, said Femi Babafemi, a spokesman for the economic and financial crimes commission. Babafemi gave no additional details about the allegations facing Bankole, other than to say that he would be held “in custody to enable him to have sufficient time to answer questions on the numerous fraud allegations against him”. Bankole apparently refused several requests by officials to be interviewed. “An intelligence report … showed that the former speaker was planning to leave Abuja for Lagos on Sunday evening and thereafter flee the country through an illegal route,” a statement from Babafemi read. It was not immediately clear if Bankole had a lawyer. His spokesman, Idowu Bakare, previously issued a statement saying Bankole “never benefited” from his position, including taking a more than $66m (£40m) loan from United Bank for Africa PLC for his office. That was on top of his annual salary and money already budgeted for his office, which runs into the millions of dollars. Positions in Nigeria’s national assembly are highly lucrative, where even low-ranking members earn more than $1m in salaries and benefits, plus the ability to direct a swollen budget in a nation where billions in oil revenues routinely go missing. Bankole conceded defeat to an opposition party candidate in Nigeria’s April elections, one of a number of prominent politicians who lost their seats in the national assembly. Many pointed to Bankole’s defeat as a sign that Nigeria’s elections, typically marred by fraud and thuggery, had improved over the country’s 12 years as a democracy. However, ballot-box stuffing and violence dominated later polls, with more than 800 people dying in religious rioting after the presidential election. Nigeria, one of the top crude oil suppliers to the US, has a long history of corruption, with one officials once estimating the country has lost more than $380bn to corruption since gaining its independence from Britain in 1960. Corruption trickles down from corrupt politicians in Abuja to the lowest police officer shaking down bribes from motorists at one of the country’s many traffic checkpoints. Bankole’s detention is the highest profile case in many months for the economic and financial crimes commission, founded by former President Olusegun Obasanjo in 2003. While critics say Obasanjo used the agency to go after his opponents, officers did make major arrests under then-chief Nuhu Ribadu. After late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s administration forced Ribadu out of office in 2008, the agency largely fell quiet. A US diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks shows diplomats have questioned new agency leader Farida Waziri’s preparedness and willingness to take on the country’s powerful political elite. Waziri has been slow to prosecute many of the high-ranking politicians once under heavy scrutiny – even after Yar’Adua’s death last year. Nigeria Africa guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …BERLIN — Better check your Facebook settings before posting a party invitation online. A teenage girl in Germany who forgot to mark her birthday invitation as private on Facebook fled her own party when more than 1,500 guests showed up and around 100 police officers, some on horses, were needed to keep the crowd under control. Eleven people were temporarily detained, one police officer was injured, dozens of girls wearing flip-flops cut their feet on broken glass and firefighters had to extinguish two small fires at the 16th birthday party in Hamburg, police spokesman Mirko Streiber said Sunday. The birthday girl, identified only as Thessa, went into hiding, Streiber said, but “nonetheless the party was a hit.” Thessa had initially only wanted to ask some friends over to her home in Hamburg-Bramfeld when she posted her invitation on Facebook, but mistakenly she published it so that everyone on Facebook could see it. The invitation quickly went viral, and some 15,000 people confirmed online they would come to the party – without even knowing the girl, weekly paper Bild am Sonntag reported. When Thessa’s parents found out, they made their daughter cancel the party, informed police and hired a private security service to protect their home on Friday night. Despite public announcements in Hamburg that the party had been canceled, some 1,500 teenagers and young adults showed up on the street in front of Thessa’s home, Streiber told The Associated Press. “We had cordoned off the house, some 100 police were on the ground, four of them on horses – but that did not keep the kids from celebrating,” Streiber said. Some revelers held up signs asking “Where is Thessa?” others brought birthday presents and homemade cake, there was lots of alcohol and the crowd chanted again and again, “Thessa, celebrating a birthday is not a crime,” – in obvious relation to the massive police presence, Bild reported. The police officer was injured when he tried to keep a party reveler from breaking off the Mercedes-Benz logo of his patrol car. “It was sheer insanity but mostly peaceful,” Streiber summed up the night with a laugh. As for Thessa – she was nowhere to be seen. Police confirmed she “was not at home that night” and Bild reported that she celebrated quietly with her grandparents at an undisclosed location.
Continue reading …After months and months of telling viewers that deficit spending is the MOST important economic issue, the media has just realized that people aren’t buying it and that the jobless recovery is a better way to blame Obama. And to be sure, the Obama White House seems to be their own worst enemy, by not focusing on job stimulus and grabbing the framing away from the Republicans. Let’s be clear: Austan Goolsbee is partially right when he says that the jobs must come from the private sector. But what he leaves out is no company will simply hire people absent an increase of demand for whatever service or product they offer. Why cut into their profit margin unnecessarily like that? And demand doesn’t increase unless there are people looking to purchase those services (tellingly, one of those services that are seeing an increase in demand are for legal assistance for the rising number of divorces and bankruptcies people are going through). And people don’t demand additional goods and services if they are struggling financially–be it unemployed or underemployed. And hence, a vicious cycle: in order to get customers, we need to have a thriving middle class with low unemployment. But we won’t have that unless we get people working. And that’s where the government has to come in. By directing federal dollars towards infrastructure projects, the government hires companies, who must hire people, thus injecting much needed demand and money into the economy. But unfortunately, we’ve seen little movement from either the White House or Congress to invest federal dollars as such. No, where we are is still buying into the whole GOP framing, as demonstrated by US Chamber of Commerce’s Martin Regalia, insisting that deficit spending is the #2 priority behind extending the debt ceiling. See how the media still gives equal weight to the same talking points that have not done a single thing to improve the economy or employment rate? Even with Chrystia Freeland and Paul Krugman pointing out that this insistence that the government “get out of the way” and not suppress economic recovery with pesky regulations (presumably those few set to avoid another financial meltdown or ecological disaster), Regalia holds on to these GOP arguments and prevents any real discussion of solutions from happening. But then again, that may be *exactly* the GOP’s (and by extension, the Chamber of Commerce) intent : Fortunately for Republicans, our broken political system doesn’t function like most democracies, so they are relieved of this tough choice and direct accountability. Thanks to divided government, and more importantly the filibuster, even in the minority, Republicans still have sufficient power to hold basically everything hostage to demand spending cuts. They are able to win the cuts while forcing the Democrats who control the White House to share the political blame for unpopular moves. This strategy is on the verge of working out great for the Republicans again Republicans are about to push President Obama to reach a “compromise” on spending cuts so he will share the blame. Cuts that are not only likely to be unpopular, but as David Dayen points out, highly anti-stimulative . The CBO’s baseline assumptions are already very dark. CBO projects that the unemployment rate will gradually fall in the near term, to 9.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2011, 8.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, and 7.4 percent at the end of 2013. Only by 2016, in CBO’s forecast, does it reach 5.3 percent, close to the agency’s estimate of the natural rate of unemployment (the rate of unemployment arising from all sources except fluctuations in aggregate demand, which CBO now estimates to be 5.2 percent). These employment assumptions are based on basically consistent spending levels. If Republicans manage to push for immediate cuts, further reducing aggregate demand, the likely result is higher than projected unemployment in 2012. Slow growth and high unemployment is almost always devastating to incumbent presidents, which, in this case, would be a huge political win for Republicans. I can fully appreciate how the Republican Party’s seemingly bipolar behavior on deficits and spending cuts is such a smart policy and political win-win for the party. What I fail to understand is why Democrats are so willing to play into their rhetorical trap, or Democrats’ stubborn refusal to even consider changing the absurd rules that make this strategy possible. But it’s more than just political calculus, as Robert Reich points out : (T)here’s a third reason for Washington’s inaction [besides Republican political machinations and Democratic Party spin]. It’s not being talked about — which is itself evidence of the problem. The unemployed are politically invisible. They don’t make major campaign donations. They don’t lobby Congress. There’s no National Association of Unemployed People. Their ranks are filled with women who had been public employees, single mothers, minorities, young people trying to enter the labor force, and middle-aged men who have been out of work for longer than six months. You couldn’t find a collection of people with less political clout. And until such time that we can come together to make our collective voices heard, I don’t know that it will ever pierce through the insularity of the Beltway bubble.
Continue reading …As no clear frontrunner emerges in the Republican presidential nomination race, the liberal media are in a full-scale panic over the thought that the former governor of Alaska might eventually enter and challenge their beloved president in November 2012. On Sunday, “Face the Nation's” Bob Schieffer asked Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour with some incredulity, “Could you ever envision yourself supporting a ticket that had Sarah Palin at the top?” (video follows with transcript and commentary): BOB SCHIEFFER, HOST: Well, what about Sarah Palin? You say she– you don’t know what she’s going to do. If she did get in, could you ever envision yourself supporting a ticket that had Sarah Palin at the top? MISSISSIPPI GOVERNOR HALEY BARBOUR: If Barack Obama was the head of the other ticket, I could.There’s no question about that. I mean, we look at the Obama policies. He wants to raise taxes when raises taxes would hurt the economy. When in fact, what we need in our country is economic growth and job creation. He pays lip service to that but his policies hurt that. Obamacare makes it harder to hire people. How do you hire people, Bob, if you don’t know what your obligations and costs are going to be for health care. All this government spending, bigger government means a smaller economy. When government is sucking trillions of dollars out of the economy, there is no money on Main Street. I can tell you that. Wall Street may be doing all right but there’s no money on Main Street. That’s where the jobs come from. So policy after policy after policy makes it harder to create jobs and grow the economy in the Obama administration. What was particularly hypocritical about Schieffer's question was that in the following segment, while interviewing former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the host repeatedly challenged his guest about the awful state of the economy and that Obama's had almost two and a half years to fix it without any success. Irrespective of who the Republicans nominate, the fact of the matter is Obama has failed to solve the nation's economic woes and Americans are very displeased. A just-released Newsweek/Daily Beast poll perfectly illustrated this: By almost four to one, Americans say our economy is not delivering the jobs we need, 81 percent to 12 percent. And Obama isn't helping. 50 percent of respondents think the president has no real plan to balance the budget; 40 percent say he does. Over half (52 percent) say their personal economic situation makes them nervous. Forty eight percent say it makes them anxious, 44 percent say it makes them upset, and 30 percent say it makes them angry. These are serious headwinds for an incumbent president regardless of what opponent he'll face in seventeen months. Yet all the media want to talk about is Sarah Palin, someone who most political observers don't believe will ever enter the race. She's got to be laughing all the way to the bank.
Continue reading …