Click here to view this media Bill O’Reilly really took it personally when Stephen Colbert made fun of O’Reilly’s bizarre column claiming that Jesus really wouldn’t have helped the poor at Christmas time — or at least worried about their unemployment checks. So O’Reilly earlier this week featured an opening segment responding haplessly to Colbert, attempting a serious theological argument with a comedian — and miserably failing: But Judeo-Christian tradition does not require blind largesse. We are not mandated to buy people gin or cocaine, or pay someone’s bills if they refuse to work. If you want to do that, you can in a free society. But to force the responsible to pay for the irresponsible is immoral in my opinion. The U.S. government makes no distinction when it comes to entitlements. The feds do not drug test or regulate the behavior of those on the dole. And there is no question that the feds waste billions of dollars every year, money taken from hardworking people. Americans are the most generous people on Earth, but our government does not have a right to seize anyone’s assets in pursuit of an impossible social nirvana. And I do believe that Jesus would agree. The best part came when he invited on Ann Coulter to back him up. Coulter tossed out her usual turdlike bon mots: “Liberals think sending a check to the IRS constitutes charity” was about as cogent as she got — while claiming that good Christian Republicans are “actually giving to poor people.” Hey, I dunno about you, but when I think of Christian charity and kindness, Ann Coulter is the first person to spring to mind. That is, as someone in deep need of it. Grade: Massive FAIL.
Continue reading …It’s been quite the year for Haiti. With election turmoil, a cholera epidemic and manifest misery almost a year after one of the most destructive earthquakes of recent times, Haiti still awaits reconstruction of its country and many of the aid dollars promised to help it recover. —JCL Reuters: Maritza Monfort is singing along to a Christmas carol in Creole on the radio, but the Haitian mother of two is struggling to lift her spirits. “I sing to ease my pain. If I think too much, I’ll die,” said Monfort, 38, one of over a million Haitians made homeless by a January earthquake that plunged the poor, French-speaking Caribbean nation into the most calamitous year of its history. With a raging cholera epidemic and election turmoil heaping more death and hardship on top of the quake devastation, Haitians are facing an exceptionally bleak Christmas and New Year marked by the prospect of more suffering and uncertainty. Read more Related Entries December 23, 2010 Christmas Stocking December 23, 2010 Holiday Foreclosures
Continue reading …State officials say that federal nose-counters overlooked 1.5 million California residents in the 2010 census, a mistake that could ultimately cost the state billions of dollars in federal money over the next 10 years and even a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. —JCL Los Angeles Times: California officials estimate that the U.S. Census Bureau failed to count 1.5 million of the state’s residents, a discrepancy that if true could cost the state billions of dollars in federal aid over the next decade and perhaps an increase in its representation in Congress. On Tuesday, the Census Bureau released national and state population figures that declared California to have 37.3 million residents, 10% more than in 2000. That growth — based on mailed-in surveys and door-to-door interviews by census takers — roughly mirrored the nation’s, but meant that for the first time since California became a state in 1850 it did not grow enough to add another member to its congressional delegation. But according to the state Department of Finance, the state’s population was 38.8 million on July 1. That figure is drawn from birth and death statistics, school-enrollment data, driver’s license address changes, tax returns and Medicare enrollment, a set of data points that provides a “more refined” picture of the population, according to H.D. Palmer, a finance department spokesman. Read more Related Entries December 23, 2010 Christmas Stocking December 23, 2010 Holiday Foreclosures
Continue reading …Holiday procrastinators packed stores Friday morning, grabbing those last few presents, snagging gift cards and the finishing touches for Christmas dinner. For stores, this 11th-hour dash caps the best holiday season since 2007. (Dec. 24)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Vice President Joe Biden suggested Friday that it’s just a matter of time before same-sex marriage is legal in all US states. “I think the country is evolving,” Biden told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “I think there’s an inevitability for a national consensus on gay marriage.” Same-sex marriage is one issue where the president and the vice president don’t seem to agree. Obama has long supported civil unions but not marriage equality. “This is the president’s policy, but it is evolving,” Biden said. Earlier this week, Obama signed into law a measure that repeals the military’s ban on gays and lesbians serving openly. At a press conference following the signing event, ABC’s Jake Tapper gave the president a chance to explain whether his views on gay marriage had changed in light of the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Is it intellectually consistent to say that gay and lesbians should be able to fight and die for this country, but they should not be able to marry the people they love?” Tapper asked . “My feelings about this are constantly evolving,” Obama replied. “I struggle with this. I have friends, I have people who work for me who are in powerful, strong, long-lasting gay or lesbian unions and they are extraordinary people. And this is something that means a lot to them and they care deeply about.” “At this point, what I’ve said is that my baseline is a strong civil union that provides them the protections and the legal rights that married couples have and I think that’s the right thing to do,” he added. “But I recognize that from their perspective it is not enough. I think we are going to continue to debate and I personally am going to continue to wrestle with going forward,” Obama said. “It’s good to hear his views are not solidly where they have been, but he’s still not there on marriage,” Brian Moulton, chief legislative counsel of the Human Rights Campaign, told The Washington Post .
Continue reading …Though politically vague and without immediate action, the Environment Protection Agency has announced it will put some regulative pressure on power plants and oil refineries to limit greenhouse gas emissions by the end of 2012. —JCL The New York Times: The Environmental Protection Agency announced a timetable on Thursday for issuing rules limiting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and oil refineries, signaling a resolve to press ahead on such regulation even as it faces stiffening opposition in Congress. The agency said it would propose performance standards for new and refurbished power plants next July, with final rules to be issued in May 2012. Proposed emissions standards for new oil refineries will be published next December, it said, with the final rules due in November 2012; rules for existing plants would come later. But the E.P.A. was vague on how stringent the rules would be and how deep a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions would result. Read more Related Entries December 24, 2010 Award Recognizes Uncompromising Change Makers December 23, 2010 Good News for the Places Where the Wild Things Are
Continue reading …The folks at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) have lovingly referred to their latest contribution to the world of science as the “poor man’s X-FEL.” An X-FEL, or X-ray Free-electron Laser, is like a super strong video microscope that converts electrons to X-rays to observe high-speed molecular movement. TU/e’s super laser alternative depends solely on a very specific bunching of electrons to do the same thing, allowing for a much smaller (it fits on a tabletop), much cheaper setup. With an estimated cost of half a million euro, the laser is hardly cheap, but it’s far more affordable than the competition: Stanford ‘s X-FEL runs hundreds of millions of dollars, and measures a whole kilometer. TU/e researchers admit that their laser can’t do everything that an X-FEL can, but, hey, you get what you pay for. Up next for TU/e? In vitro pork products. Yummy. Dutch scientists develop half million euro, ‘affordable’ super laser originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:58:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …Like a metaphorical piece of Swiss cheese, U.S. sanction policy is allegedly riddled with loopholes. A former Treasury official claims licenses to trade with blacklisted countries like Iran have been distributed to the tune of billions of dollars of profits, all at the behest of lobbying groups. Officials are worried about damaging U.S. “integrity” with such loopholes. —JCL The BBC: US sanctions tend to be riddled with exceptions that are neither humanitarian nor democracy-related, a former US sanctions official has said. Stuart Eizenstat, a deputy treasury secretary in the Clinton era, told the BBC World Service that such loopholes were created by lobbying groups. A New York Times report found evidence of US firms trading legally with blacklisted countries such as Iran. Read more Related Entries December 24, 2010 Award Recognizes Uncompromising Change Makers December 23, 2010 Good News for the Places Where the Wild Things Are
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Stuart Varney, a FOX News pro-business a-hole, was on during Megyn Kelly’s show yesterday and was all giddy because Republicans in the House passed a new rule which will make it tougher to pass legislation to raise the debt ceiling, House Republicans set to release their recommended rules changes Wednesday will change the names of several committees and repeal a rule making it more difficult to raise the debt ceiling. They will also require that all bills be posted online three days before a vote. {} The draft rules would repeal the “Gephardt Rule” that allows the House to raise the debt limit automatically when a conference report on the budget is approved. If the rule is repealed, a separate vote on raising the debt ceiling must be held. The Republicans will play chicken with Obama over the debt ceiling and of course the budget, which will come up, I believe, in March. How will the President handle these fights? Dan Pfeiffer says Obama will fight. Pfeiffer described 2011 as a “year with compromise and confrontation,” and on spending issues, he at least talked the language of confrontation. “The President is willing to draw tough lines in the sand… we’re not going to let the Republicans take the country in the wrong direction. You can’t make the car go faster by taking out the engine,” he concluded, referring to spending cuts. The President echoed some of these sentiments in his press conference yesterday , saying “I expect we’ll have a robust debate about this when we return from the holidays — a debate that will have to answer an increasingly urgent question — and that is how do we cut spending that we don’t need while making investments that we do need — investments in education, research and development, innovation, and the things that are essential to grow our economy over the long run, create jobs, and compete with every other nation in the world.” He’s made a distinction between “programs we don’t need” and programs that deserve investment, so the question becomes what programs does the President have in mind that are no longer necessary. As I said, Varney was very pleased that Republicans passed the new rule so they can hold hostage the government, which they hope will allow them to cut as much spending as they inhumanly can from the federal government. Varney makes the case that if Republicans don’t get what they want, they will at least threaten to shut down the government, which includes Medicare, Social Security and those screwed-up wars. Varney: There’s a new sheriff in town, it’s called the Republican Party that now runs the House of Representatives and they’re going to introduce new rules which will make it much more difficult-time consuming to raise that debt ceiling. You know it used to be automatic. That’s gone. Kelly: And if Republicans do freeze the debt ceiling it would mean the immediate succession of more than 40% of all federal government activities including Social Security, military operations in Afghan and Iraq, Homeland security, medicare, unemployment insurance. This would threaten the safety and economic security of all Americans. Why is he wrong? Varney: (Gleefuly) Oh, he’s not wrong. What we’ve done here is to raise the possibility of that happening if the Republicans don’t get their way on spending. It’s a political contest with the Republicans and the Democrats and President Obama. Who is going to win? What’s the price the Republicans will extract from raising the debt ceiling, what’s the price? They want to cut spending…The economist is right, You shut the government down and that’s a very serious thing. They will try to ram down spending cuts of all kinds to justify anything that the President will need when it comes to the purse strings. And Mitch McConnell already said ” just wait till next year ” which means that the GOP must rule or else. Doesn’t sound like Republicans want to be too bipartisan to me. Don’t look for the media to be offended if the government is shut down with some extra crispy obstructionism. They’ll salivate for it and hope it happens. Will the Obama administration finally call their bluff? The debt ceiling is now just a move on the game board for Republicans. The President should make them either shut down the government if they do indeed try to get him to cut spending on anything. Protecting Social Security will be one of my main goals in 2011.
Continue reading …