Home » Posts tagged with » america (Page 66)

Standard & Poor’s downgrade of America’s credit rating represents a new factor in America’s creditworthiness—”political insanity,” writes Edmund Andrews in the National Journal . Indeed, Andrews notes that S&P explicitly cited politics in its downgrade: “The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking…

Continue reading …
Cokie Roberts on Downgrade: ‘The Problem That We Have Here is the Constitution’

ABC's Cokie Roberts said something on national television Sunday that made her colleague George Will shake his head on camera. During a “This Week” discussion about the recent credit rating downgrade by Standard and Poor's Roberts said, 'The problem that we have here is the Constitution of the United States of America which actually does require people to come together from different perspectives” (video follows with transcript and commentary): COKIE ROBERTS: This group of people in New York [Standard and Poor’s] is actually talking about more government rather than less government, Congressman. In fact, the reason they like France and Great Britain is because they’re parliamentary systems where the majority gets what it wants no matter what. And the problem that we have here is the Constitution of the United States of America which actually does require people to come together from different perspectives whether it's divided government or not. We have divided branches of government under any circumstance. Wow! In June, Time magazine's managing editor Richard Stengel wrote a cover story asking, “Does the Constitution Still Matter,” and now Roberts goes on national television blaming our credit rating downgrade on America's most sacred document. Somehow I doubt Roberts would be bemoaning the majority's inability to ram through any legislation it wanted if the Republicans controlled the White House as well as both chambers of Congress. Liberals like her only decry divided government when they're in control. But what shouldn't have missed the eyes of viewers was George Will shaking his head in the foreground as Roberts made this absurd comment. Fans of his surely know how he believes one of America's greatest strengths is indeed divided government. As it pertains to the current debt issue, something Will wrote in September 2008 was amazingly prescient: Divided government compels compromises that curb each party's excesses, especially both parties' proclivities for excessive spending when unconstrained by an institution controlled by the other party. William Niskanen , chairman of the libertarian Cato Institute, notes that in the past 50 years, “government spending has increased an average of only 1.73 percent annually during periods of divided government. This number more than triples, to 5.26 percent, for periods of unified government.” That bears repeating: “[I]n the past 50 years, 'government spending has increased an average of only 1.73 percent annually during periods of divided government. This number more than triples, to 5.26 percent, for periods of unified government.'” As such, if your real goal is reduced spending, the divided government Roberts so despises is actually the answer. It's certainly not surprising that she doesn't know this and Will does.

Continue reading …

Notorious hacker collectives AntiSec and Anonymous have hacked into 70-some law enforcement websites from around the United States, in what they say is retaliation for last month’s arrests of hackers around the world , reports the AP . The groups managed to snare “a massive amount of confidential information that is sure…

Continue reading …
Clarence Page: ‘Is The Tea Party Over?’

Want to know just how scared of the Tea Party America's media are? On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune's Clarence Page published a column entitled “Is The Tea Party Over?”: Has the tea party peaked? Republican lawmakers affiliated with the upstart anti-tax movement scored big in the nerve-racking debt-ceiling debacle, but the victory left enough hard feelings to feed the movement's ultimate defeat. So let's understand Page's thinking. The Tea Party nine months ago scored a huge victory assisting Republicans to the biggest midterm election landslide in decades. The following month, before any of these Tea Partiers had even been sworn into Congress, the President and his Party caved into their wishes by extending the Bush tax cuts. Last week, the President and his Party caved into Tea Party demands to not have tax increases as part of the debt ceiling agreement. And it is the Tea Party that is in danger of “ultimate defeat?” Let's hear more: Polls indicate growing numbers of the public think the teas have become part of the problem they came to Washington to cure. Fully 82 percent of Americans disapprove of Congress' performance in the hard-fought debt limit debate, according to a New York Times/CBS News poll. People love to hate Congress, even when they like their own congressman. But this was Congress' highest disapproval rating, the pollsters said, since they began asking the question in 1977. And public disapproval of the tea party doubled to 40 percent from 18 percent when that question was first asked in April 2010. So a New York Times/CBS News poll finds 40 percent disapprove of the Tea Party. Given how so-called “news” outlets like the Times and CBS have been mercilessly pounding on Tea Party members for over two years, is that surprising? Frankly, it's more shocking given the negative media coverage of this group that more Americans don't disapprove of it. But the only poll that really matters happens on Election Day, and the last one was quite good for the Tea Party. Page sees this as old news: Tea party freshmen faced a more conservative electorate in the 2010 midterms than the larger turnout that's expected in a presidential year. Yet they continue to push further right. Let the voters decide. That's a good point, for midterm elections are typically more participated in by conservatives than liberals with 2006 being a notable exception. As such, history would suggest at least a more moderate turnout next November. However, with the economy weakening, a credit rating downgrade, and monstrous budget deficits as far as the eye can see, it seems specious to project the public rising against the only movement preaching fiscal sanity. Page doesn't see it that way: Grass-roots movements are like bees, an old saying goes, they sting and then they die. The tea party, like the original Boston Tea Party, fits what the founders called a movement of the moment. Like others, the teas are likely to melt, at best, into one of the major parties. Maybe, but this might be wishful thinking. The reality is the Tea Party is the most powerful grassroots movement to hit America's shores in decades, and its real power and impact might yet to be fully felt. This seems especially likely given the trajectory of the economy, the debt, and which Party has basically been in control of government since the downturn happened and the deficit exploded. What Page ignored in his piece is that the nation made a huge turn to the left in 2006 and 2008 in the hopes that the imposition of non-Republican views would improve America. When the Democrats took over Congress in January 2007, unemployment was 4.4 percent. It is now 9.1 percent. The budget deficit created by the outgoing Republican Congress was only $161 billion. It is now $1.6 trillion. The total outstanding debt in January 2007 was $8.7 trillion. It is now $14.6 trillion. And, before the Democrats took control of everything, America's credit rating was AAA. It is now AA+. If Page thinks Americans are going to look at what's happened in the past four years and blame it all on the Tea Party I've got some swampland in Florida I'd like to show him.

Continue reading …
Tony Blankley Sarcastically Says to Rude and Dismissive Al Sharpton ‘You Are a Very Polite Gentleman’

MSNBC's Al Sharpton on Friday was being tremendously rude and dismissive to his guest the always well-mannered Tony Blankley. So discourteous was Sharpton that at the end of the discussion, Blankley sarcastically said, “You are a very polite gentleman” (video follows with transcript and commentary): AL SHARPTON, HOST: What is the plan of the Tea Party to create jobs? TONY BLANKLEY: Look, the Tea Party has two policies they are trying to get. They want to reduce the debt and they want to reduce the size of government. SHARPTON: How do you produce jobs? BLANKLEY: Let me at least finish a couple of sentences. The fundamental problem and the reason why the public is so alienated that the entire political class obviously doesn’t have an answer to these problems, and we are getting more and more scared everyday. And the Tea Party is one voice. They are representing a lot of populist sentiments. You’ve got progressives on the other side having another voice. Nobody is coming up with a convincing policy prescription. That’s why the country is so scared. SHARPTON: Oh, I got it. So I ask you and Joe was quiet and I was quiet, what is the Tea Party’s plan and you just spent the minute telling me about how nobody had a plan. So, I guess the answer is: the Tea Party has no plan. BLANKLEY: I told you — SHARPTON: It reminds me of James Brown my mentor. James Brown used to say, it's like a dog knife, Tony — it just can’t cut it. You’re talking loud and saying nothing. BLANKLEY: You are a very polite gentleman. How pathetic. Is this really what MSNBC is striving for in the 6PM time slot opposite Fox News's highly acclaimed “Special Report?” On Thursday, Report trounced MSNBC Live attaining four times the viewership in the all important demographic aged 25-54. It appears that I'm not the only one in America that thinks this show with the perilously biased Sharpton as host is totally unwatchable.

Continue reading …
Tony Blankley Sarcastically Says to Rude and Dismissive Al Sharpton ‘You Are a Very Polite Gentleman’

MSNBC's Al Sharpton on Friday was being tremendously rude and dismissive to his guest the always well-mannered Tony Blankley. So discourteous was Sharpton that at the end of the discussion, Blankley sarcastically said, “You are a very polite gentleman” (video follows with transcript and commentary): AL SHARPTON, HOST: What is the plan of the Tea Party to create jobs? TONY BLANKLEY: Look, the Tea Party has two policies they are trying to get. They want to reduce the debt and they want to reduce the size of government. SHARPTON: How do you produce jobs? BLANKLEY: Let me at least finish a couple of sentences. The fundamental problem and the reason why the public is so alienated that the entire political class obviously doesn’t have an answer to these problems, and we are getting more and more scared everyday. And the Tea Party is one voice. They are representing a lot of populist sentiments. You’ve got progressives on the other side having another voice. Nobody is coming up with a convincing policy prescription. That’s why the country is so scared. SHARPTON: Oh, I got it. So I ask you and Joe was quiet and I was quiet, what is the Tea Party’s plan and you just spent the minute telling me about how nobody had a plan. So, I guess the answer is: the Tea Party has no plan. BLANKLEY: I told you — SHARPTON: It reminds me of James Brown my mentor. James Brown used to say, it's like a dog knife, Tony — it just can’t cut it. You’re talking loud and saying nothing. BLANKLEY: You are a very polite gentleman. How pathetic. Is this really what MSNBC is striving for in the 6PM time slot opposite Fox News's highly acclaimed “Special Report?” On Thursday, Report trounced MSNBC Live attaining four times the viewership in the all important demographic aged 25-54. It appears that I'm not the only one in America that thinks this show with the perilously biased Sharpton as host is totally unwatchable.

Continue reading …
Texas Drought Continues, Massive Strain On Electrical Grid Will Produce Rolling Blackouts. Can We Talk About Climate Change Now?

enlarge So will Texans still chant the right-wing “no such thing as global warming” mantra, or will they finally wise up and start demanding their officials do something to save what’s left of our ability to survive on the planet? Oh, and grow crops, too: Electricity officials in heatwave-hit Texas have warned of impending rolling blackouts from power shortages as the U.S. state struggles to cope with the relentless scorching temperatures. Texans have turned to air conditioners in huge numbers in a bid to beat one of the hottest summers on record in America’s second most populous state. But bosses for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) say the soaring power demand in the face of the brutal heatwave has left the state one power plant shut-down away from rolling blackouts. Temperatures in Texas are currently topping 100F (37.8C) and have been soaring for well over a month. Record highs have also been recorded this week in nearby states Oklahoma and Arkansas as the relentless heatwave spreads across southern America. In Forth Smith and Little Rock, Arkansas, the mercury hit 115F on Wednesday. ERCOT, which runs the power grid for most of Texas, cut power to some large industrial users after electricity demand hit three consecutive records this week alone. The grid operator now faces rolling blackouts similar to those which hit Texas during a bitter cold snap in February. In Dallas, Texas, a pensioner died from ‘heat-related’ causes after her air conditioning unit was stolen from her house. Power usage in ERCOT reached its highest level ever on Wednesday at 68,294 megawatts, almost four per cent over last year’s peak. The Texas grid faces at least one more day of extreme stress before temperatures cool slightly over the weekend.

Continue reading …
S&P’s Credibility Gap

Click here to view this media John Chambers, managing director of sovereign ratings at S&P was interviewed by CNN’s Anderson Cooper after the S&P lowered our credit rating . There were a lot of factors at work here when S&P decided to become a new unelected branch of U.S. government when they issued their downgrade even AFTER they admitted to making a $2 trillion mistake in their calculations. In other words they wanted to do this for months and no stinkin’ facts were going to stop them. You can see how Chambers tries to skirt the math error as if two trillion was trivial in this debate. The panel of pundits CNN used for the most part, except those who want to destroy our social safety nets, said that the world still views our bonds as the safest bet in the world. I do believe that if Republicans and tea party ideologues didn’t play politics with the debt ceiling, this probably wouldn’t have happened. There’s a reason why, before the tea party came into town, staunch conservatives never seriously screwed with it before (outside of a few dissents by members in Congress over raising it). In his many complaints it’s obvious that S&P blames mostly the GOP because of their behavior and for their love of Grover Norquist’s hostage-taking anti-revenues ideals. The firm’s conclusion “was pretty much motivated by all of the debate about the raising of the debt ceiling,” John Chambers, chairman of S&P’s sovereign ratings committee, said in an interview. “It involved a level of brinksmanship greater than what we had expected earlier in the year.” He also attacked our social safety nets, but as Duncan says : “Apparently we’re supposed to care about what some idiots at some corrupt organization think about anything.” The rating agencies helped cause the global financial meltdown in the first place since they rated so much junk AAA right before Rome burned down. Matt Taibbi has been writing about this for a long time. David Atkins recaps some of the reasons why the S&P has no real standing after their past actions. I have little to add on this front to what Digby and Paul Krugman have already said, but a few key points bear repeating: It was S&P that had Lehman Brothers rated AAA just a month before they went bankrupt. It was S&P that rated AIG’s credit default swaps as rock solid investments It was S&P that admitted to making a $2 trillion accounting error (remember, playing with numbers is their core business and reason for being) in advance of the downgrade of U.S. debt. A downgrade in U.S. debt means functionally that U.S. treasury bills are, in S&P’s oh-so-wise opinion, less trustworthy and a greater credit risk to investors. This comes only a day after investors fled the DOW and S&P500 into the safe and waiting hands of…you guessed it: U.S. Treasuries. The same treasuries that S&P suddenly finds a more dangerous buy. So what does that say about the stock market, and the S&P500? Perhaps S&P might wish to re-evaluate the credibility of its own market index. None of the other ratings agencies are taking the drastic step that S&P has. S&P is all alone in their move to downgrade U.S. credit. When all is said and done, U.S. treasuries are still the safest investment in the world, and it would take either an idiot or someone with a strong political agenda to contend otherwise. S&P’s credibility to make any sort of statements about anything at all is highly suspect. By all rights their failure to properly evaluate Lehman and AIG alone would mean that if the alleged free market were doing its job, all the ratings agencies would have gone out of business or been disbanded a long time ago. It is remarkable that anyone on the left, right or center pays any attention to anything they have to say, much less that an entire nation quakes in fear of their oracular pronouncements. The Wall St. Emperor was exposed as naked years ago, yet everyone still pretends that he’s clad in the finest raiments of wisdom. The fact is that S&P, for whatever reason—be it political, economic, corrupt or some combination thereof—has desperately wanted to downgrade U.S. debt for months. First came the clearly unfeasible demand that the U.S. cut $4 trillion in spending while eliminating all the Bush tax cuts, even on the middle class. Then came the austerity debt-ceiling bill, which was put in place over the top of a snookered public precisely to avoid a credit downgrade. Then came the threat to downgrade our credit anyway. Then came the admission of their $2 trillion accounting error in making the threat. And then came the downgrade in spite of it all. Let’s be clear: S&P was always going to make this move, no matter what we did. The austerity bill was thus an utterly pointless exercise to appease a ratings agency acting in bad faith. The President needs to be strong here and not give an inch to S&P or the GOP and govern like a Democrat. Look what trying to compromise with Republicans has accomplished for his presidency so far? It’s kind of shocking how the entire stock market is guided by confidence fairies and not actual numbers. Politicians and CNBC pundits are loath to give many straight answers concerning Wall Street since so much betting is involved and one wrong statement can cause a 1000 point drop in a matter of minutes simply because of fear. I’d say we’ll wait and say how the market responds to this power play by S&P. As Paul Krugman says: On one hand, there is a case to be made that the madness of the right has made America a fundamentally unsound nation. And yes, it is the madness of the right: if not for the extremism of anti-tax Republicans, we would have no trouble reaching an agreement that would ensure long-run solvency. On the other hand, it’s hard to think of anyone less qualified to pass judgment on America than the rating agencies. The people who rated sub-prime mortgage-backed securities are now declaring that they are the judges of fiscal policy? Really? Just to make it perfect, it turns out that S&P got the math wrong by $2 trillion, and after much discussion conceded the point — then went ahead with the downgrade. — In short, S&P is just making stuff up — and after the mortgage debacle, they really don’t have that right. So this is an outrage — not because America is A-OK, but because these people are in no position to pass judgment. Just expect the GOP to come out in force to use this downgrade as a way of trying to undo the New Deal and every major advancement progressive politics has produced for the betterment of our country.

Continue reading …
Yahoo: ‘America’s Credit Rating Was Intentionally Sabotaged By Congressional Republicans’

“[I]t's difficult to escape the conclusion that America's credit rating was intentionally sabotaged by Congressional Republicans.” So wrote Yahoo Finance economics editor Daniel Gross Friday evening: In downgrading the U.S.'s credit rating, S&P points out what has long been obvious: Washington's inability to come to an agreement on how to close the large fiscal gaps that have emerged since the recession began is troubling. Recent events have sapped the agency's confidence that the government can and will do what is necessary to align revenues with spending commitments. And it's difficult to escape the conclusion that America's credit rating was intentionally sabotaged by Congressional Republicans. And what's Gross's real beef with Republicans? If you guessed “No new taxes,” give yourself a cigar: It has long been obvious to all observers — to economists, to politicians, to anti-deficit groups, to the ratings agencies — that closing fiscal gaps will require tax increases, or the closure of big tax loopholes, or significant tax reform that will raise significantly larger sums of tax revenue than the system does now. Today, taxes as a percentage of GDP are at historic lows. Marginal rates on income and investments are at historic lows. Corporate tax receipts as a percentage of GDP are at historic lows. Perhaps taxes don't need to rise this year or next, but they do need to go up in the future. Otherwise, the math of deficit reduction simply doesn't work. “Otherwise, the math of deficit reduction simply doesn't work.” Bear in mind, this is Yahoo Finance's economics editor, who appears to not understand math. Since the Democrats took over Congress in 2007, spending has increased by $1.1 trillion or 41 percent. If we went back to the exact same outlays called for in that last budget approved by a Republican Congress, we'd actually have a $200 billion surplus in fiscal 2012 based on OMB's projected tax receipts for that year. If we adjusted 2007's spending for inflation, we'd only have a $43 billion deficit next year thereby totally avoiding S&P's downgrade without raising taxes one cent. How's that for simple math, Mr. Economics Editor? (H/T NB reader Rusty Arnold)

Continue reading …
Investors, Politicians Worried of Downgrade

The lowering of America’s sterling credit rating was the punctuation mark on a tumultuous week in financial markets. (Aug. 6)

Continue reading …