Bank Of America Stock Falls 20 Percent After $10 Billion Lawsuit Bank of America stock tumbles on AIG suit – Aug. 8, 2011 Financial Report: Financial Shares Broadly Lower ClassWarfare123 says: Investors are losing confidence in Bank of America . http://fb.me/Ce9eS78W
Continue reading …Seems like America’s doors are still wide open to new musical immigrants, because Spotify’s stateside foray has just boosted its overall valuation to $1.1 billion. That’s based on its two most recent investment rounds, which racked up another $100 million from new and old investors who are clearly convinced that the streaming platform can carve out a niche between existing rivals like Rhapsody and new entrants like Google Music and iCloud . Meanwhile, AllThingsD are reporting figures from an unnamed source who says that the London-based company now has 1.4 million US subscribers, of which 175,000 are coughing up $10 per month for premium features like mobile access. If accurate, that equates to a conversion rate of 12.5-percent — not quite as high as the 15-percent it achieved in Zamunda Europe, but still impressive. Spotify reported to have 175,000 paid-up Americans, valued at $1.1 beeellion originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:22:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink
Continue reading …A few weeks ago, New York Times media columnist David Carr was mocking the Rupert Murdoch media empire on The Colbert Report as a “40 billion dollar big blob of media.” He kept up the anti-Fox News line in his Monday column titled “News Corp.’s Soft Power In the U.S.” Carr began by arguing many saw “in horror or amusement” that “the News Corporation regarded Britain’s legal and political institutions as its own private club. That could never happen in the United States, right?” Carr was implying heavily that it already has, insinuating that Rupert Murdoch has been soft-power-kissed by even the Clinton Justice Department, as in a 1997 acquisition of Heritage Media, a competitor in the in-store advertising business with Murdoch’s News America Marketing. The man in charge of antitrust enforcement then was Joel Klein, now a Murdoch adviser. In a passage with all the evidentiary value of a detective novel, Carr spins a mystery tale of a shocking merger approval (shocking even to participants). Clearly, Rupert was pulling strings like a puppet-master, even if the proof is more than a little bit lacking: None of this suggests that Mr. Klein cut some sort of a deal that resulted in a job 14 years later. But the speed of the antitrust decision surprised even the people involved in the takeover. One of the participants, who declined to be identified discussing private negotiations, said he thought the sale was effectively blocked before the surprising turnaround. “After that meeting with the San Francisco office, we all looked at each other and said, `This deal is not going to happen,' ” he said. My colleague Eric Lipton and I spent a few days trying to tease apart who made the actual decision to give the purchase the go-ahead – “It was as if a magic button had been pushed somewhere. We were all in shock,” said one of the same participants in the deal – but there is no paper trail. People who worked at the Justice Department back then either could not recollect how the decision was made or declined to share information if they knew. A spokeswoman for the News Corporation released this statement: “Joel didn't know Mr. Murdoch at the time of the Heritage Media transaction 14 years ago. A year later, the D.O.J. under his leadership challenged the PrimeStar transaction in which News Corporation had a major interest. Any suggested inference is ludicrous.” But when it comes to Murdoch, the Times is too partisan to avoid the ludicrous-inference story. Joel Klein’s approval was a disaster, Carr reported. Murdoch's ruthless thugs would descend on competitors with threats:
Continue reading …A 61 ans, elle tente de parcourir 168km à la nage 61-Jährige schwimmt von Kuba nach Florida American sets of on record Cuba-to-Florida swim meghanbartels says: Good luck to Diana Nyad , who swims way better than I do… http://t.co/sMhBwCF
Continue reading …Obama hits back at S&P’s downgrading of US credit rating and blames Tea Party Republicans for loss of AAA status Barack Obama has dismissed Standard and Poor’s downgrading of America’s credit rating and insisted the US remained an AAA country. In his first words since S&P’s decision on Friday evening, he sought to calm the markets, which had been tumbling since opening, saying America’s problems were solvable, providing there was the necessary political will. “This is the United States of America. No matter what some agency says, we will always be a triple A country,” he said. As well as seeking to reassure the markets, Obama also sought to protect his chances of re-election to the White House next year by blaming the decision on Tea Party Republicans. The downgrade, the first in American history, provides the Republicans with a powerful stick to with which beat him in the election campaign. Candidates seeking the party nomination to take on Obama pinned responsibility on the president, saying he had provided poor leadership and failed to take desperately-needed action to make even deeper debt cuts. A CNN poll showed 75% of those surveyed felt the economy was going badly – up 15% since May. Despite the Wall Street selloff, prompted by the ratings downgrade, international investors piled into US treasury bonds. By midday in New York, two-year US Treasuries were in such demand that their yields hit an all-time low of 0.24%. At the same time, 10-year Treasuries fell to 2.36%. Analysts said that – compared with the problems mounting in the eurozone – the US looked a safe haven. The VIX index – known as the “index of fear”, because it measures market confidence – jumped to levels not seen since the depths of the 2009 recession. Obama spoke from the White House while the markets were still open in the hope that he might have an influence – but they continued falling during and even after his statement. The president, blaming the Republicans, said the downgrade was not so much because of doubts about America’s ability to pay its debts but the month of wrangling in Washington over the debt ceiling rise. The question was a political one, not a financial one, he said. In a swipe at S&P, he noted that other credit agencies had not joined it in downgrading America. “It does not mean we don’t have a problem,” Obama said, citing the deadlock in Washington over the last month. He said the threat from the Republicans had upset the market, and that was a “legitimate concern”. But he claimed there was good news in that the problem could be fixed by balancing the budget and the new Congressional super-committee being set up to look at spending cuts and revenue raising could provide the answers. Good bipartisan proposals were out there, he said. “It is the lack of political will in Washington” that was the problem. He would put forward proposals of his own over the next few weeks. His statement is unlikely to create much confidence that there will be a bipartisan agreement. The president insisted there had to be tax raising measures, a move the Republicans say they will not even contemplate. Obama also said that any cuts in benefits, such as Medicare, would be “modest”, while Republicans are looking for deep cuts. Much of the political action this week will be in Iowa, the first state where the Republicans will hold their caucus early next year to choose a candidate to take on Obama. Most of the Republican hopefuls will be campaigning in the state this week ahead of a televised debate on Thursday and a straw poll on Saturday. However, the candidates lined up on Monday to blame Obama. The present Republican frontrunner, Mitt Romney, speaking in New Hampshire, another of the early states in the Republican nomination battle, said Obama was primarily responsible for the downgrade because he had failed to stimulate economic growth. He added that some of the blame could be placed on Democrats and Republicans in previous Congresses. “No, I don’t think it’s simply the president’s fault. I’m sure there are many people who share responsibility in Washington for the excessive spending over the last couple of decades,” Romney said. Democrats, most of them anonymous, also criticised Obama, saying his present troubles are a direct result of his failure to stand up to the Tea Party Republicans during the debt ceiling stand-off. There is unlikely to be much relief for Obama over the summer holidays. The political focus will shift to the composition of a new Congressional super-committee set up as part of the deal last week to draw up detailed plans for debt reduction. The committee is due to begin work in September and identify areas for spending cuts before the end of the year. The Obama administration expressed hope that the downgrade will put pressure on the bipartisan committee to reach a compromise. But Republicans, having fought two successful guerrilla campaigns this year so far in which they threatened to close down the federal government and force the US to default, are almost certain to renew hostilities over spending. Ha-Joon Chang, page 26 US economy Financial crisis Global recession United States Barack Obama Banking Stock markets Economics Ewen MacAskill guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …The credit downgrade must be having truly deleterious effects on New York-based reporters. At least one is hyping the merits of “freeganism,” which is just a politically correct euphemism for dumpster diving. “Amid S&P downgrades and widespread panic about financial markets, an anti-consumerism movement quietly marches on: Freeganism,” ABCNews.com's Reshma Kirpalani argued in an August 8 article:
Continue reading …The credit downgrade must be having truly deleterious effects on New York-based reporters. At least one is hyping the merits of “freeganism,” which is just a politically correct euphemism for dumpster diving. “Amid S&P downgrades and widespread panic about financial markets, an anti-consumerism movement quietly marches on: Freeganism,” ABCNews.com's Reshma Kirpalani argued in an August 8 article:
Continue reading …Click here to view this media While I do not agree with all of the points Fareed Zakaria made during this segment, like comparing protecting our social safety nets to the Republicans rigidity on tax increases and painting those as being somehow equivalent; especially if you’re talking about raising the retirement age on Social Security instead of raising the income cap to keep it solvent for the long term. That said, I was glad to see someone point out just how destructive the Republicans use of the filibuster has been as he did here. And I agree with his points on the need to do more spending on education and infrastructure to get our economy growing again. Transcript via CNN : ZAKARIA: We’ve downgraded ourselves. We’ve demonstrated to ourselves, the world, to global markets that our political system is broken and that we are incapable of implementing sensible public policy. The actual cut to the 2012 budget, which is the only budget over which this Congress has any control, is $21 billion out of a total of $3 trillion in expenditures. Everything else can and will be changed by future Congresses. What the deal does is once again kick tough choices down the road, this time to a Congressional supercommission that will have to come up with a larger plan to reduce our debt. And it does nothing to spur growth, and, without growth, the debt and the deficit will expand well above current projections. The manner in which the deal was produced has added poison to an already toxic atmosphere in Washington, making compromise even more difficult. Democrats now feel they need to mirror the Tea Party’s tactics because they worked and they are becoming unyielding on any cuts to entitlement programs like Medicare. Republicans, emboldened by the success of their bullying, have closed ranks more solidly around a no-tax agenda, which is great, but the only solution to America’s debt dilemma needs to involve both cuts to entitlement programs and higher tax revenues. Congress is more polarized than ever before, and that polarization has resulted in paralysis. More than two years into the Obama administration, hundreds of key positions in government remain vacant for lack of Senate confirmation. The Treasury Department, for example, had to handle the global financial crisis, recession, bank stress tests, the automaker bailouts, as well as its usual duties with about a dozen of its senior positions, almost its entire top management, vacant, nobody in there. Senate rules have been used, abused and twisted to allow constant delay and blockage. The filibuster, which was historically employed about once a decade, is now a routine procedure that allows the minority to thwart the will of the majority. In 2009, Senate Republicans filibustered a stunning 80 percent of major legislation. Given how the chamber is composed, two senators per state no matter how thinly populated those states, people representing just 10 percent of the country can block all legislation. Is that how a democracy should function? These dysfunctions come at a bad time. The United States faces intense pressures from an aging population, technological change, globalization, new competitors. We need smart policies in every field. We need to pare back spending in areas like health care and pensions, but we need to expand it in others like research and development, infrastructure and education in order to boost economic growth. In an age of budgetary limits, the money needs to be spent wisely and only on programs that are effective. But, in area after area – energy, immigration, infrastructure – government policy is suboptimal, a sad mixture of political payoffs, corruption and ideological positioning. Countries from Canada to Australia to Singapore are implementing smart policies, copying best practices from around the world. We bicker and remain paralyzed. If, as a result of these Congressional antics, interest rates on America’s debt rise by one percent – in other words, if the world asks for just a little bit more interest in order to lend us money – the budget deficit will rise by $1.3 trillion over 10 years. That would more than wipe out the entire 10 years of cuts proposed in the debt deal. That’s the system at work these days. For more on this, you can read my cover story in this week’s “Time” magazine or Time.com.
Continue reading …Moody’s may have already reaffirmed America’s AAA credit rating , but it released a statement today reiterating that that could still change. If the US doesn’t find more deficit reductions pronto, it could face a downgrade before 2013, the agency warned, according to Reuters . Analyst Steven Hass wrote that he’d like…
Continue reading …